375:
consciously incompetent acolytes who comingle with consciously competent and, even unconsciously competent journeymen. Whatever the degree of one's self-awareness or competence, it's important to get it right, to be fair and to hold back on any issue of doubt; hold oneself back, I mean. And if we find others giving us cues to hold back, we should check ourselves, not just carry on blasting away. Let's treat caution from others as a signal to reflect a little on whether we're sure that our opinion is REALLY an objective fact. What is objectivity anyway? WP, in my take, hinges on the subjectivity/objectivity problem. If everyone agrees on something, is it objectively true, or is it just a mass delusion and therefore infectious subjectivity!? But I digress a little here.
164:
108:
356:"Fair play" is what's needed from all parties. Knowledge should be used to inform and to share, accurately and without weasel words. If unintentional inaccuracies occur, then fine, the Wiki process clears them up and we all agree to that by participating; and because of the subjectivity/objectivity problem sometimes we are unaware of bias in our words, or that they would appear as weasel words.
26:
132:
50:
74:
200:- if an argument is getting hot, back off. Don't say anything with a hot head. You may change your mind later and live to regret what you said. You can always make a point more strongly, but back-pedalling is rarely a human trait. Save your best ammunition for later. Don't play all your cards at once. Keep your
367:
But what if
Knowledge has somehow acquired the status of some kind of authority? Can we be sure that it has or hasn't? And can we know who is going to read an article, and how much they will be influenced by it? And what effect that might have on their life and behavior? These questions are important
359:
The particular trouble is that in this case the perception of accuracy by each party is (apparently) divergent, and that the subject of disagreement is (ultimately) money, stuff that can produce the most powerful emotions. So in my opinion the solution is maybe not to argue about accuracy, but to try
323:
By its very nature, Knowledge will continue to evolve. So even if instanteneously we were to attain a perfect understanding and knowledge of
Knowledge, it would immediately begin to be imperfect thereafter. In reality, Knowledge is just too big and complex for any one of us to know everything there
187:
I mediate. My goal is to calm down heated arguments. I express no substantive opinions on debates I attempt to mediate. I like to learn about different perspectives, and watching arguments is the fastest way to do this. Perhaps my goal is unattainable, but I would like to help editors to overcome
374:
What's unique is that
Knowledge gives people who are inexperienced in the subtleties and complexities of editing and biography (of which there are many) equal standing with entries written by people who are deeply experienced in such pursuits. Unconsciously incompetent amateurs rub shoulders with
363:
The key "meta issue", as I see it, is that
Knowledge's status in the public psyche is unclear. Is it just a harmless bit of lightweight fun, that can have no significant consequences? In which case we could live with a little inaccuracy and perhaps good-natured promotion of agendas. Oh, and maybe
276:
Since the mind is associative, people will associate your good behaviour with respecting your perspective, even if it has been deleted or edit-warred out. Edit-warring is the fastest way to alienate not just other editors, but readers too. Try to build
204:
in check, even if you feel you are right, you have been wronged or your opponent is a "moron". This is not a religiously-inspired view, but one based on the pursuit of
Personal
299:
It's rare that an adversary not respond well. In the rare case that this does not work, invite other editors to contribute. Give thanks to your opponent for airing their view.
328:. Bear this in mind not just if you find yourself being challenged by a fellow Wikipedian, but also if you challenge a Wikipedian and get an answer you didn't expect. '
389:
I'd be interested for people's thoughts on this. If there is official WP policy on this topic, then please guide me. We're all learners here.
115:
171:
57:
285:. One of the greatest things that Knowledge exhorts us to achieve is to learn to work with anyone; this is a great
305:
If a call-to-order doesn't work, explain the mediation path you will take. Go gradually, first unofficially with
226:
A bit of humour goes a long way in defusing a situation, especially if it is not at the expense of your adversary.
306:
33:
378:
We should therefore adopt not just all the policies of NPOV, good faith and so forth, but also a policy of
314:
144:
332:
We can not just have such epiphanies ourselves, we can also watch and help others experience them too.
259:
310:
336:
I wrote the following contribution in my first foray into mediation; it serves pretty well as a
267:
326:
And it is therefore of paramount importance that we are ably to rely upon each-other's goodwill
232:
Knowledge is not about point-scoring or pushing agendas; and the best victories are bloodless.
371:
So what duty of care does an editor have, even unknowingly? I'll come to that in a moment.
384:
I will not write something about someone that I would not like to see written about myself
262:
so bear this in mind. Our subjectivity filters our take on reality more than we realise.
360:
and find some other guiding principle(s) and to agree which one(s) take(s) precendence.
236:
We do not (yet) know how the public psyche perceives
Knowledge - and maybe never will.
324:
is to know about how to be a good
Wikipedian. Therefore we all rely on each other.
217:
205:
87:
81:
382:
where an issue becomes contentious. As well as that, I have adopted a policy where
250:
196:
163:
368:
and the answer to them must surely be "we don't yet know - and maybe never will".
230:
Never write something about someone that you wouldn't want to read about yourself.
286:
254:
131:
107:
25:
271:
213:
337:
282:
294:
209:
278:
188:
their differences and collaborate to produce widely-endorsed articles.
49:
73:
224:
If you are involved in an edit-war, try to disengage and make light.
201:
191:
I have learned the value of these principles in particular:
441:
First to fall over when the atmosphere is less than perfect
403:
First to fall over when the atmosphere is less than perfect
342:
443:
Your sensibilities are shaken by the slightest defect
405:
Your sensibilities are shaken by the slightest defect
429:You pay your analyst to reach the same conclusions
242:. Treat Knowledge as powerful and authoritative,
447:You get so dizzy even walking in a straight line
433:You get so dizzy even walking in a straight line
427:Now if I tell you that you suffer from delusions
419:You get so dizzy even walking in a straight line
409:You get so dizzy even walking in a straight line
413:You say you want to spend the winter in firenza
445:You live your life like a canary in a coalmine
431:You live your life like a canary in a coalmine
417:You live your life like a canary in a coalmine
407:You live you life like a canary in a coalmine
260:Even logic itself can be considered empirical
8:
415:Youre so afraid to catch a dose of influenza
238:It's best therefore to exercise caution on
113:This user strives to maintain a policy of
31:This user was a volunteer mediator in the
399:"Canary in a Coalmine" - by The Police
330:That's the moment at which you learn.'
7:
158:
126:
102:
68:
44:
20:
14:
162:
130:
106:
72:
48:
24:
1:
347:CanaryInACoalmine's Manifesto
169:This user is a member of the
345:
85:policy advising against all
270:, the more favorably other
172:Knowledge Department of Fun
465:
353:
321:We are all learners here.
307:Knowledge:Mediation cabal
313:and, if all else fails,
119:on controversial issues.
266:The less you shout and
391:
303:Mediate incrementally.
79:This user maintains a
451:Canary in a coalmine
354:
315:Knowledge:Arbitration
281:rather than breeding
37:before it was closed.
437:Canary in a coalmine
423:Canary in a coalmine
240:contentious subjects
311:Knowledge:Mediation
274:will look upon you.
244:just in case it is
139:This user is proud
58:assumes good faith
395:
394:
220:for distinction).
184:
183:
179:
178:
155:
154:
123:
122:
95:
94:
65:
64:
41:
40:
456:
343:
293:Try to engender
166:
159:
147:
134:
127:
110:
103:
88:personal attacks
76:
69:
52:
45:
28:
21:
16:
15:
464:
463:
459:
458:
457:
455:
454:
453:
448:
446:
444:
442:
438:
434:
432:
430:
428:
424:
420:
418:
416:
414:
410:
408:
406:
404:
397:
388:
387:
377:
376:
373:
372:
370:
369:
366:
365:
362:
361:
358:
357:
186:
180:
156:
151:
145:
141:
124:
96:
66:
42:
34:Mediation Cabal
12:
11:
5:
462:
460:
393:
392:
380:self restraint
351:
350:
334:
333:
318:
300:
290:
263:
247:
233:
227:
221:
197:Self-restraint
182:
181:
177:
176:
167:
157:
153:
152:
137:
135:
125:
121:
120:
111:
101:
98:
97:
93:
92:
77:
67:
63:
62:
53:
43:
39:
38:
29:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
461:
452:
449:
439:
435:
425:
421:
411:
401:
400:
390:
385:
381:
352:
348:
344:
341:
339:
331:
327:
322:
319:
316:
312:
308:
304:
301:
298:
296:
291:
288:
284:
280:
275:
273:
269:
264:
261:
257:
256:
252:
248:
245:
241:
237:
234:
231:
228:
225:
222:
219:
218:Effectiveness
215:
211:
207:
206:Effectiveness
203:
199:
198:
194:
193:
192:
189:
174:
173:
168:
165:
161:
160:
150:
148:
140:
136:
133:
129:
128:
118:
117:
112:
109:
105:
104:
100:
99:
90:
89:
84:
83:
78:
75:
71:
70:
60:
59:
54:
51:
47:
46:
36:
35:
30:
27:
23:
22:
18:
17:
450:
440:
436:
426:
422:
412:
402:
398:
396:
383:
379:
355:
346:
335:
329:
325:
320:
309:; then with
302:
292:
265:
251:Subjectivity
249:
243:
239:
235:
229:
223:
195:
190:
185:
170:
142:
138:
114:
86:
80:
56:
32:
364:humor too!
272:Wikipedians
255:Objectivity
55:This user
287:life skill
214:Efficiency
146:Wikipedian
116:neutrality
338:Manifesto
283:hostility
295:Goodwill
268:edit-war
210:Efficacy
143:to be a
279:consent
253:versus
216:(see [[
82:strict
212:and
202:Ego
386:.
349:.
340::
258:-
208:,
317:.
297:.
289:.
246:.
175:.
149:.
91:.
61:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
