Knowledge

User talk:Amlaera

Source 📝

297:
pudgy little fellow with a woeful expression is running to his mother with his arms stretched up to her, as she stands with a wagging finger and an expression of perhaps bemused censure. The humor lies precisely in treating a couple of gods as if they're just a whining kid and his mom. It's a common misconception that ancient literature sounds like stiff and formal Victorian translations. Greek and Latin literature had as great a range of
482: 194: 84: 262:: the point of the tale is that Cupid is a child, and that he cries and runs to his mom, who laughs at him. It's meant in the original to be light and humorous, and to make fun of Cupid's self-centeredness and childlike cluelessness. By changing the language, you lose the point of the characterization. The tale is told in the tone of light erotic mockery often associated with 688: 413:
summarizing the tale in general, not one version; that is, the general treatment of it as reflected in various art works and little poems, which is what's needed here. I usually make it clear whose summary I'm using, but had pushed the Youens footnote later into the section. (Theocritus's treatment influences the later tradition, but strictly speaking is about
579:
Everyone except you is agreeing that it should be occluded on the talk page. And what, because I stopped editing for a while I am no longer allowed to make edits? And as you see, I didn't edit since the "Undue Weight - discuss" was added, I am fine with it being discussed. And please stop accusing me
397:
200 (sad face), but who's counting, right? :) On topic: I think I stumbled on to what the problem is. In the source you linked (Hugo Wolf And his MÜrike songs by Susan Youens), two poems/story's are told, one by Theocritus and one by Anacreon. The Anacreon one describes Eros as crying, and the other
135:
This bibliography has been on Knowledge for quite some time now, it is only since I have attempted to edit the page that I have had issues. To delete the page would in my opinion be harsh. Nobody has commented before on problems and clearly we need to sort it out, but I would ask that it not be
323:
was to revert vandalism (section blanking) a week ago. And as I said, "cries and runs to mommy" may be factually correct, but I still think it sounds too informal to be phrased that way in an encyclopedia. An analogy: In an article about suicide, I wouldn't write "kicked the bucket" or something
296:
You changed it twice, and I don't want to get in an edit war. "He cries and runs to his mother Venus" seems pretty straightforward: crying is crying ("crying" meaning "wailing" or "producing tears" is not the same as "complaining"), and running is running. Just as DĂźrer chose to illustrate it: a
412:
Yes, but people shouldn't have to take a stabbing in order to edit; that's exactly the kind of environment I would hope to discourage. I failed to watch my tone because I was unduly impatient about returning to the topic, for the very reason that I left it in an unsatisfactory state. Youens was
281:
I dont know what you mean with "keep changing", only changed once. I haven't read the original story, so I can't say the exact words they used, but "cries and run to mom" sounds very informal to me, not really what I'd expect from an old Greek tale, or from an encyclopedic summary. It may be
429:
article, and I look forward to doing that for at least some of them at some point. When I was working on Cupid, I was in a rush because it was around Valentine's Day and the article had languished in an execrable state for a long time. It was not a thorough job, and I got distracted by
671:
It is a very bad idea for someone who is involved in a dispute with an ongoing RfC to try to implement that RfC themselves without formal closure by an uninvolved administrator. In this particular case it is not clear at all that there is a consensus for your proposal at this
110:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
114:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
378:
hundred edits and no articles created. I'm sure you're only trying to be conscientious. I don't mean to discourage new editors! That would be quite contrary to my hopes for the future of Knowledge. Best wishes,
161: 107: 342:. It does not say anything about cupid crying. When you summarize a story you can't incorporate elements from other works i.e. a painting of the story. I'll go ahead and change it. 398:
does not. So it seems we are both at least partially right. Maybe the article should reflect this? I leave that up to you since you are clearly the more experienced editor.
236:
Thanks - It put a smile on my face :) I would have given you one for your increasingly (as the debate went on) insurmountable patience, but I don't know how to make one yet.
206:
I was considering making a Barnstar of Annoyingly Dogged Persistence for you instead - but I've been impressed with your reasoning, politeness and good humour during
207: 40: 542:
A zombie account is one that does not edit for an extended period and suddenly comes "back to life". There is no consensus on the talk page. You are at
54:, a forum on Knowledge for new editors to ask questions about editing Knowledge, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! - 96: 434:(where footnote 10, for instance, clarifies the sources used for the longer-than-usual plot summary). So my snippiness was entirely uncalled for. 699:
that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use
356:
This isn't a summary of Theocritus (the article says the tale was first told by him), it's a summary of the story as it was used in the
220: 125: 486: 160:, and that page is being considered for deletion. If you want to weigh in your opinion, the discussion is being held at 448:
Thank you for your explanation(s), I feel that we have reached a tranquil state of enlightenment a.k.a consensus.
599: 498: 360:, based on the secondary sources used to compile the article. Frankly, you don't know what you're talking about. 100: 157: 91: 75: 421:
and the billion Valentine greetings he spawned—which is what the articles focuses on, relegating the Roman
641: 563: 518: 595: 62: 137: 490: 418: 357: 141: 439: 384: 365: 310: 271: 51: 691:
Constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page
339: 700: 696: 625: 608:
No, of course I am not. Any admin can confirm that. Are you the same person as Evergreen Fir?
547: 502: 426: 298: 214: 119: 673: 431: 692: 494: 55: 425:
to a section.) Each of these sections on a "Cupid" theme could be easily expanded into a
180:
I would say yes, never seen it before. I don't really see what point your trying to make.
193: 708: 622: 481: 374:
Apologies if I sounded curt. I see that you're a fairly new editor with only a couple
543: 535: 435: 380: 361: 306: 267: 153: 609: 581: 449: 399: 343: 325: 283: 237: 211: 116: 324:
similar, because it would be bad taste and informal, even if it would be correct.
39: 646: 568: 523: 263: 704: 17: 687: 302: 173: 282:
factually correct, but I'd still prefer a re-phrasal of that sentence.
156:'s page. I moved the bibliography of all his books to a seperate page 393:
No worries, I can take a stabbing. Actually , my edits are just over
712: 676: 651: 617: 603: 589: 573: 528: 457: 443: 407: 388: 369: 351: 333: 314: 291: 275: 245: 225: 145: 130: 64: 319:
No, I only changed this one time. The only other time I've been at
320: 414: 108:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Zairi Bibliography
162:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Zairi Bibliography
594:
Are you the same person as that Delicious Maple fellah?
259: 89:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
95:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
546:on that page anyway. Consider this your warning. 703:for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. 210:, so I reckon this one is more appropriate... 8: 174:http://en.wikipedia.org/H._James_Harrington 417:in his Greek context, not the Cupid of 7: 258:I don't know why you keep changing 97:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 338:I have found a translation of the 25: 106:The article will be discussed at 686: 480: 192: 176:- is this page not promotional? 82: 38: 1: 652:06:05, 30 December 2014 (UTC) 618:05:57, 30 December 2014 (UTC) 604:05:48, 30 December 2014 (UTC) 590:05:41, 30 December 2014 (UTC) 574:05:33, 30 December 2014 (UTC) 529:03:57, 30 December 2014 (UTC) 713:23:15, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 677:23:10, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 674:User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 728: 92:Mohamed Zairi Bibliography 76:Mohamed Zairi Bibliography 36: 493:Knowledge, as you did at 191: 136:deleted at this time. ( 50:, you are invited to the 613: 585: 458:07:39, 31 May 2013 (UTC) 453: 444:18:39, 30 May 2013 (UTC) 408:14:34, 30 May 2013 (UTC) 403: 389:14:06, 30 May 2013 (UTC) 370:14:00, 30 May 2013 (UTC) 352:07:52, 30 May 2013 (UTC) 347: 334:06:31, 30 May 2013 (UTC) 329: 315:20:06, 29 May 2013 (UTC) 292:19:04, 29 May 2013 (UTC) 287: 276:15:27, 29 May 2013 (UTC) 246:08:31, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 241: 226:07:46, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 146:10:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC) 131:09:06, 15 May 2013 (UTC) 99:or whether it should be 65:22:59, 11 May 2013 (UTC) 682:Misleading edit summary 623:No, we're just lovers. 489:. If you continue to 208:our recent discussion 200:The Civility Barnstar 499:blocked from editing 580:and being hostile. 419:classical mythology 358:classical tradition 185:A barnstar for you! 487:disruptive editing 650: 572: 527: 485:Please stop your 231: 230: 152:This isn't about 71: 70: 16:(Redirected from 719: 690: 644: 638: 635: 632: 629: 566: 560: 557: 554: 551: 521: 515: 512: 509: 506: 484: 432:Cupid and Psyche 301:and register of 223: 217: 196: 189: 188: 128: 122: 86: 85: 60: 42: 35: 34: 21: 727: 726: 722: 721: 720: 718: 717: 716: 693:White supremacy 684: 669: 667:White Supremacy 636: 633: 630: 627: 596:Volunteer Marek 558: 555: 552: 549: 540: 513: 510: 507: 504: 495:White supremacy 478: 340:original Idylls 256: 221: 215: 187: 171: 126: 120: 87: 83: 80: 67: 56: 33: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 725: 723: 683: 680: 668: 665: 663: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 539: 532: 477: 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 460: 391: 336: 255: 252: 251: 250: 249: 248: 229: 228: 203: 202: 197: 186: 183: 182: 181: 170: 167: 166: 165: 81: 79: 74:Nomination of 72: 69: 68: 45: 43: 32: 29: 27: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 724: 715: 714: 710: 706: 702: 698: 694: 689: 681: 679: 678: 675: 666: 664: 653: 648: 643: 640: 639: 624: 621: 620: 619: 615: 611: 607: 606: 605: 601: 597: 593: 592: 591: 587: 583: 578: 577: 576: 575: 570: 565: 562: 561: 545: 537: 533: 531: 530: 525: 520: 517: 516: 500: 497:, you may be 496: 492: 488: 483: 476:December 2014 475: 459: 455: 451: 447: 446: 445: 441: 437: 433: 428: 424: 420: 416: 411: 410: 409: 405: 401: 396: 392: 390: 386: 382: 377: 373: 372: 371: 367: 363: 359: 355: 354: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 335: 331: 327: 322: 318: 317: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 295: 294: 293: 289: 285: 280: 279: 278: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 253: 247: 243: 239: 235: 234: 233: 232: 227: 224: 218: 213: 209: 205: 204: 201: 198: 195: 190: 184: 179: 178: 177: 175: 168: 163: 159: 155: 154:Mohamed Zairi 151: 150: 149: 147: 143: 139: 133: 132: 129: 123: 118: 112: 109: 104: 102: 98: 94: 93: 77: 73: 66: 63: 61: 59: 53: 49: 44: 41: 37: 30: 28: 19: 697:edit summary 685: 670: 662: 626: 548: 541: 503: 479: 422: 394: 375: 305:as English. 257: 199: 172: 134: 113: 105: 90: 88: 78:for deletion 57: 47: 26: 18:User:Amlaera 701:the sandbox 264:anacreontea 169:Promotional 534:Reply and 58:Camyoung54 705:Dave Dial 645:Please {{ 567:Please {{ 522:Please {{ 491:vandalize 138:Sara Dawe 436:Cynwolfe 381:Cynwolfe 376:thousand 362:Cynwolfe 307:Cynwolfe 268:Cynwolfe 52:Teahouse 31:Teahouse 695:has an 610:Amlaera 582:Amlaera 538:warning 450:Amlaera 427:spinoff 400:Amlaera 344:Amlaera 326:Amlaera 303:diction 284:Amlaera 238:Amlaera 212:Yunshui 117:Yunshui 101:deleted 48:Amlaera 46:Hello! 642:(talk) 564:(talk) 544:WP:3RR 536:WP:3RR 519:(talk) 423:Cupido 672:time. 321:Cupid 254:Cupid 709:talk 614:talk 600:talk 586:talk 454:talk 440:talk 415:Eros 404:talk 385:talk 366:talk 348:talk 330:talk 311:talk 299:tone 288:talk 272:talk 260:this 242:talk 158:here 142:talk 637:Fir 634:een 631:rgr 628:Eve 559:Fir 556:een 553:rgr 550:Eve 514:Fir 511:een 508:rgr 505:Eve 501:. 395:300 711:) 649:}} 647:re 616:) 602:) 588:) 571:}} 569:re 526:}} 524:re 456:) 442:) 406:) 387:) 368:) 350:) 332:) 313:) 290:) 274:) 266:. 244:) 148:) 144:) 103:. 707:( 612:( 598:( 584:( 452:( 438:( 402:( 383:( 364:( 346:( 328:( 309:( 286:( 270:( 240:( 222:水 219:‍ 216:雲 164:. 140:( 127:水 124:‍ 121:雲 20:)

Index

User:Amlaera
Teahouse logo
Teahouse
Camyoung54

22:59, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Mohamed Zairi Bibliography
Mohamed Zairi Bibliography
Knowledge's policies and guidelines
deleted
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Zairi Bibliography
Yunshui
雲
ć°´
09:06, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Sara Dawe
talk
10:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Mohamed Zairi
here
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Zairi Bibliography
http://en.wikipedia.org/H._James_Harrington

our recent discussion
Yunshui
雲
ć°´
07:46, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Amlaera
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑