77:– Political parties which have or have had representation in national or regional assemblies should be regarded as notable. Election to tertiary level assemblies should be taken on merit, with reference to the other clauses. The fact that a party has fielded unsuccessful candidates is by itself not enough for that party to be deemed as notable, but having fielded a very large number of candidates (in constituency systems) or having attained a substantial portion of the vote (while failing to get any members elected) is sufficient.
248:
A party which is a formal ally of a party that meets the electoral clause is notable, although any article should contain enough material to avoid being merged into its founder/co-founder. This includes all parties that are formal and full members of international party federations or parties at the
140:
Political parties which have or have had representation in national or regional assemblies should be regarded as notable. Election to tertiary level assemblies should be taken on merit, with reference to the other clauses. The fact that a party has fielded unsuccessful candidates is by itself not
48:
and the now deleted Pride in
Paisley Party, it seems that Wiki does not have a firm and absolute policy on the notability of political groups and parties. Now, for the most part, in my opinion, any policy will not effect the Republican Party or the Labour Party or UMP or the Austrlian Labor
252:
In countries with fluctuating coalitions this clause could spread notability from one or two parties to all parties within the electoral system, thereby invalidating the purpose of setting criteria for notability. A similar problem could occur if this clause is combined with "The
Lineage
187:
which prove the party's importance. Parties with no electoral success can still be regarded as notable if they have 2 years of proven campaigning experience. This also includes notable pressure or para-military groups which claim to be political parties, but may not be electorally
105:
which prove the party's importance. Parties with no electoral success can still be regarded as notable if they have 2 years of proven campaigning experience. This also includes notable pressure or para-military groups which claim to be political parties, but may not be electorally
174:
Tighten the clause to avoid more than 1 generational leap of notability. Remove the clause entirely in favour of the philosophy that if the second party article cannot achieve notability on its own then it should merge with its notable relative.
170:
If being the child of a notable party makes a second party notable then being the child of the now-notable second party will make a third party notable. This could create a long chain of notable party articles based solely on the notability of 1
233:
The fact that a party has fielded unsuccessful candidates is by itself not enough for that party to be deemed as notable, but having fielded a substantial proportion of the candidates, or having attained a substantial proportion of the vote, is
141:
enough for that party to be deemed as notable, but having fielded a very large number of candidates (in constituency systems) or having attained a substantial portion of the vote (while failing to get any members elected) is sufficient.
52:
From the discussions already had, I would like to outline a Wiki policy on the notablity of parties. Luckily I think we escape the shortcode being WP:POLPOT but only just...Anyway, my "five golden rules" are as follows...
64:
Without prejudice to existing notability articles, Knowledge (XXG) editors should take heed of the following provisions/clauses when dealing with articles about political parties, or political "lists" where appropriate.
191:
The 2 year rule may be too open. A party that campaigns in a tertiary-level election 1 year then a secondary-level election the next would be considered notable even if they failed to get any votes
225:
Consider for inclusion in region/electoral-system specific notability criteria/Consider merging registration and campaigning causes together, creating reserached/referenced minor parties article
32:
101:– A party that has an indisputable, clear, and certain importance in a state's political, cultural or social history, is regarded as notable. This notability must be based upon an
183:
A party that has an indisputable, clear, and certain importance in a state's political, cultural or social history, is regarded as notable. This notability must be based upon an
144:
It is easier to elect candidates from small parties in some electoral systems compared to others. This clause would make some less significant parties notable in such systems
219:
The fact that a party has registered as a party is not enough for that party to be deemed as notable, unless that registration was difficult to obtain
203:
113:
116:, should be given a place within that person's article until such time as it satisfies other clauses in its own right.
206:, should be given a place within that person's article until such time as it satisfies other clauses in its own right
184:
102:
95:
is notable, although any article should contain enough material to avoid being merged into its "parent"/"child".
167:
is notable, although any article should contain enough material to avoid being merged into its "parent"/"child"
49:
Party...What we are dealing with here are the small, the protest votes, the newly formed groups and such like.
56:
I would love feedback and discussion on this subject, before I post the results over for wider "Peer review"
38:
37:
A number of editors will be invited to comment, and a tag will be placed above. You can join in at
45:
240:
Try to tighten the definition or leave the vague area as a subjective decision for editors
26:
17:
33:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Political_Parties...?
69:
Amendments will be made when felt appropriate following dicussion at the talk page
222:
What context is used to justify whether a registration was difficult to achieve?
256:
Consider for inclusion in region/electoral-system specific notability criteria
147:
Create different notability guidelines for different electoral systems/regions
112:– A party which is launched or helped launch by a person who meets the
202:
A party which is launched or helped launch by a person who meets the
60:
Draft proposal on
Notability of Political Party Articles
185:external, verifiable, published, reliable source
103:external, verifiable, published, reliable source
8:
237:"substantial proportion" is a little vague
31:This draft/sandbox article is taken from
204:wikipedia notability criteria for people
119:
114:wikipedia notability criteria for people
216:The Registration Insufficiency Clause
163:successor to a party which meets the
91:successor to a party which meets the
7:
209:No issues identified at this stage
24:
230:The Failure Insufficiency Clause
1:
273:
194:Tighten the 2 year rule.
44:Following such AfDs for
83:– A party which is the
39:User talk:Doktorbuk/pp
155:A party which is the
137:The Electoral Clause
75:The Electoral Clause
180:The Campaign Clause
132:Possible solutions
99:The Campaign Clause
152:The Lineage Clause
81:The Lineage Clause
46:Money Reform Party
260:
259:
199:The Person Clause
159:precursor of, or
110:The Person Clause
87:precursor of, or
264:
165:electoral clause
161:de jure/de facto
157:de jure/de facto
120:
93:electoral clause
89:de jure/de facto
85:de jure/de facto
272:
271:
267:
266:
265:
263:
262:
261:
245:Alliance Clause
43:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
270:
268:
258:
257:
254:
250:
249:European level
246:
242:
241:
238:
235:
231:
227:
226:
223:
220:
217:
213:
212:
210:
207:
200:
196:
195:
192:
189:
181:
177:
176:
172:
168:
153:
149:
148:
145:
142:
138:
134:
133:
130:
127:
124:
118:
117:
107:
96:
78:
27:User:Doktorbuk
23:
18:User:Doktorbuk
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
269:
255:
251:
247:
244:
243:
239:
236:
232:
229:
228:
224:
221:
218:
215:
214:
211:
208:
205:
201:
198:
197:
193:
190:
186:
182:
179:
178:
173:
169:
166:
162:
158:
154:
151:
150:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:
131:
128:
125:
122:
121:
115:
111:
108:
104:
100:
97:
94:
90:
86:
82:
79:
76:
73:
72:
71:
70:
66:
62:
61:
57:
54:
50:
47:
41:
40:
35:
34:
29:
28:
19:
164:
160:
156:
126:Description
109:
98:
92:
88:
84:
80:
74:
68:
67:
63:
59:
58:
55:
51:
42:
36:
30:
25:
234:sufficient
253:Clause"
188:active.
171:article
129:Issues
123:Clause
106:active.
16:<
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.