877:", those blue links in an article that lead to some other related article. To make a wikilink, surround the term you want to link with doubled square brackets. A reasonable criterion for when to wikilink is: is this something that a reader of this article might want to learn more about? Something between one wikilink per paragraph and one or two wikilinks per sentence is a good idea. But don't link the basic words that everyone already understands, and don't link the same phrase more than once in close succession: we don't want the articles to be a sea of blue. Wikilinks are not a good substitute for having enough context within the actual text of an article: you'd think that, if someone doesn't understand a linked phrase, they'll go to the link to find out about it, but what happens more often is that they just give up. So it may be a good idea, when you wikilink a phrase, to also include a short description of the meaning of the phrase next to it.
1068:
1086:
276:
39:
504:. The main grounds for inclusion of a topic in Knowledge are that the topic is the subject of multiple published works that are independent of each other. By providing published sources about the topic, you can convince other Knowledge editors that it's an important enough topic to include in the encyclopedia, and forestall them from trying to delete your content.
133:. When you write about a topic, you learn about it yourself; you may well find the topics you write about useful later in your own research. Also, when you carefully survey a topic, you are likely to find out about what is not known as well as what is known, and this could help you find future research projects.
832:
does not have a title and should provide a useful summary of the whole article for someone who doesn't read any more than just that one section. Everything that's in the first section should be described in more detail in a later section. That is, the first section is closer to being an abstract than
557:
For articles about living people, the rules for citing are much stricter: articles without citations and controversial unsourced statements within an article are both subject to deletion. The threshold for how significant an academic should be to warrant having a
Knowledge article about them is, very
508:
Knowledge articles therefore tend to have a higher citation density than research articles and survey articles. In a research article, much of the content is likely to be original and unsourced, and even in a survey article, you would probably feel free to make up small unsourced derivations that are
90:
If you are a professional researcher, engineer, mathematician, scholar, graduate student, or other academic, you are very likely already familiar with writing survey articles and survey sections of research articles. Writing a
Knowledge article is almost the same, but there are a few differences that
979:
Several academic journals now provide a dual-publishing model where suitable academic review articles are published as a stable, indexed version of record, and also copied as a
Knowledge page. These generate a citeable version of the article for the author as well as providing peer-reviewed content
865:
Articles should be as non-technical as possible. That doesn't mean making things incorrect or leaving out important technical details. What it does mean is avoiding technical language when it is not necessary, providing brief nontechnical definitions for the technical terms you do use, spelling out
570:
Survey/review articles and textbooks usually make the best sources. Journal articles, research monographs, and edited volumes are also pretty good sources, but it is not safe to rely on a single journal article on a controversial topic (because the author may be on one side). Articles in newspapers
588:
If you have a choice between citing something to a textbook and to the original research paper it was published in, cite both: the research paper is an important part of the history of the subject, but the textbook will be better at convincing other editors that the subject is important, better at
147:
has started to take "broader impacts" more seriously on grant applications, and if you can make a convincing case that your
Knowledge editing activity is significant enough to count as a broader impact then that will probably improve your chances of getting funding. And getting more funding really
861:
use as much lowercase as possible: only the first word of the title, and proper names within the title, should be capitalized. The same is true for references to other concepts within the text of an article: write "minimum spanning tree", not "Minimum
Spanning Tree", and "Wagner's theorem", not
846:
The first sentence of an article should provide some context and provide a very brief definition of the article's subject. The title of the article should appear within that sentence, in boldface (surround it by tripled single-quote characters). A standard formula for a first sentence is "In ,
358:
The discussion pages for these projects are a good place to ask about the details of formatting articles for that discipline, for finding other editors to help fix problems you've found, and to find out about articles in need of work. For longer lists of projects that might be relevant to your
154:. This may or may not be a good reason, depending on what your advisor asked you to edit. Articles about a general subject area that you're starting to learn about in your own research, as a way of making a public contribution while helping you learn: good. Articles about your advisor (
921:
Don't feel compelled to include proofs of every mathematical statement. Knowledge relies on sources a lot more than it relies on proofs. Some proofs can be included, but only when they are useful for helping readers understand the subject rather than merely to verify that it's
623:
Knowledge is not as fussy about citation formats as an academic journal. Any functional format can be used. The main thing is just to make sure that everything has a source, and that the citation to the source is complete enough that others can figure out what it is.
524:– external publications that confirm what you've written. In very short articles, you may be able to get away with leaving all the sources for a separate reference section at the end; for longer articles, the text of the article should have inline
121:. You've probably already found some important topics that you know about from your research that are missing from Knowledge, or worse, described incorrectly. Who better than someone who knows about these topics professionally to repair the damage?
486:
are crucial in
Knowledge writing. In other kinds of academic writing, citations are used mainly to give proper credit for the origin of an idea. In Knowledge, citations can be used for this purpose, but more often they serve two other purposes:
127:. To write well on Knowledge, you have to pay more attention to matters of readability than you might when writing for your peers. Practicing your writing ability in this way is likely to cause your professional writing to improve.
926:
1260:
Azzam, Amin; Bresler, David; Leon, Armando; Maggio, Lauren; Whitaker, Evans; Heilman, James; Orlowitz, Jake; Swisher, Valerie; Rasberry, Lane; Otoide, Kingsley; Trotter, Fred; Ross, Will; McCue, Jack D. (2016),
496:. A reader with some level of lay knowledge (e.g., scientific literacy) but without your specialized training should be able to tell whether what you wrote is true by comparing it against the sources you cite.
913:
Mathematical formula formatting is, frankly, a big weak point of
Knowledge (and the internet), and one that it would take a long time to explain in detail. Fortunately, it's already been done elsewhere: see
757:
of all the editors who are interested in the subject (and by some complicated bureaucracy if that fails). So in particular, some of the changes you make are likely to be undone by other people, who may well
1377:
571:
and magazines about scientific results can also be good sources, but are better for establishing notability than for verifiability (the popular press often gets the science wrong). Try to avoid using
115:. As a researcher you are benefiting from a vast collection of survey articles written by the Knowledge community. Why not reciprocate and help improve the existing articles by sharing your knowledge?
1130:
797:
793:
602:
397:, and your level of knowledge will be apparent in your edits and discussions. Other editors will tend to respect your knowledge and writing skills more than your formal qualifications.
742:
by the door. Telling other editors that you have a Ph.D. in the subject isn't going to help. To win a dispute over the content of an article, you need to back up your opinion with
1666:
910:
at the bottom. If you create a new article, it should have categories too. Find articles on as closely related topics as you can find, and copy the category formatting from them.
102:
You already have other avenues for publishing your writing professionally, and plenty of demands on your time. Why should you take the extra time to write for
Knowledge as well?
143:). And in most cases the fact that you've contributed to an article is invisible to most readers, so it's also not going to do much for making you more famous. But recently the
703:
606:
463:. However, licenses prohibiting commercial use or derivative works are not compatible with Knowledge (Knowledge is used commercially, and is itself a derivative work).
1166:
929:, pseudocode is better than code. And if an article has one (code or pseudocode) implementation, that's enough; don't add a second one in your favorite other language.
867:
813:
528:
that refer to the list of references at the end. The trustworthiness of a
Knowledge article is based on the authority of the sources, not the authority of the author.
1472:
109:. Part of being an academic is communicating to the public, and Knowledge is a great way of writing about research in a way that can be found and read by the public.
1120:
866:
phrases rather than using acronyms, and providing plenty of context. Start slow and put the more technical parts off to as late as possible within the article. See
429:
28:
252:. Click the "Edit" tab, top right; if you are not logged in to an account, a popup will offer the choice. If you have logged in, you can set your editing mode at
828:(marked by putting the section title on a line by itself, with doubled equal signs on both sides of it) and sometimes subsections (tripled equal signs). The
1152:
1146:
294:
1233:
Masukume, G.; Kipersztok, L.; Das, D.; Shafee, T.; Laurent, M.; Heilman, J. (November 2016), "Medical journals and
Knowledge: a global health matter",
1136:
1038:
884:
plural ("we") is very popular in academic writing. It's not popular here. Fortunately it's almost always possible to reword your writing to avoid it.
464:
441:
540:
1262:
915:
816:. These Knowledge-internal best practices are a careful balance of compromises, and they generally do not match in every detail what is preferred
552:
352:
833:
it is to being an introduction. There should be a "References" section at the end, containing the references from the article (usually using the
1576:
532:
336:
943:
939:
27:
This is a guide for subject experts who have worked as a researcher, scholar, or academic. Experts without an academic background may prefer
1497:
Tsueng, Ginger; Good, Benjamin M.; Ping, Peipei; Golemis, Erica; Hanukoglu, Israel; Wijnen, Andre J. van; Su, Andrew I. (5 November 2016).
778:
695:
460:
817:
387:
589:
making the subject verifiable, and probably better at helping novices learn more about the subject. For more on selecting sources, see
166:
Do not go into Knowledge for the purpose of boosting its coverage of you as a person or of your research publications. It can be OK to
598:
769:
The peer review on Knowledge can be harsh. Your edits may be reverted by automated tools designed to rapidly remove large volumes of
893:
660:
340:
214:
55:
781:. Seek more constructive review from other editors. Remember that removed content can be put back with almost no effort (but avoid
576:
559:
360:
332:
283:
947:
1046:
472:
417:
344:
213:
If you intend to edit Knowledge more than once or twice, and especially if you ever intend to create new articles, there are
191:
789:
shows that, sadly, a lot of good would-be contributors disengage rather than discuss when their contributions are rejected.
1219:
348:
675:
437:
144:
47:
1355:
1332:
786:
535:) should have at least one footnote or other source, and in many cases every sentence will have its own source. The
1418:
1171:
996:
590:
1609:
1412:
Wodak, Shoshana J.; Mietchen, Daniel; Collings, Andrew M.; Russell, Robert B.; Bourne, Philip E. (29 March 2012).
140:
1661:
1125:
809:
652:
436:
may be ok (but usually you are required to state the source of the copied text in the edit summary). Copying or
1109:
907:
854:
774:
759:
746:, published material in journals, books, theses, newspapers, etc., that says what you want the article to say.
656:
618:
536:
222:
1029:
572:
492:
723:
328:
306:
174:, and it is almost never OK to create or edit an article about yourself. If you develop a reputation as a
753:
of an article and vet changes by others. Instead, disputes over the content of an article are handled by
1103:
1019:
719:
642:
383:
375:
364:
175:
139:. Actually, I don't think any tenure committee is going to care about your Knowledge contributions (but
1024:
973:
1427:
1180:
1114:
730:
the conflict is to discuss it on the article's discussion page. Knowledge stringently adheres to the
500:
421:
287:
94:
Welcome to Knowledge; we greatly appreciate your desire to help build and maintain the encyclopedia!
1067:
1085:
770:
594:
425:
317:
302:
253:
59:
1547:
1638:
1321:
957:
900:
782:
298:
226:
198:
167:
69:
1499:"Gene Wiki Reviews—Raising the quality and accessibility of information about the human genome"
558:
roughly, at the level one would expect of a full professor at a major research university; see
1631:
1529:
1454:
1294:
1250:
1207:
727:
691:
628:
405:
279:
264:
171:
1621:
1588:
1555:
1520:
1510:
1445:
1435:
1392:
1313:
1304:
Bond, Alexander L. (2011), "Why ornithologists should embrace and contribute to Knowledge",
1285:
1277:
1242:
1198:
1188:
1165:
Logan, Darren W.; Sandal, Massimo; Gardner, Paul P.; Manske, Magnus; Bateman, Alex (2010), "
1045:: they do not charge any fees. The peer reviewers are volunteers, and the costs paid by the
874:
837:
825:
731:
327:
One way to stay connected to the greater Knowledge community is through discipline-specific
313:
1473:"Continuing to Bridge the Journal-Knowledge Gap: Introducing Topic Pages for PLOS Genetics"
444:, if they appear in a publication that you don't own the copyright of, may not be allowed.
275:
155:
899:
Examples are good, but don't work them out step-by-step in the manner of a textbook — see
881:
260:
179:
820:. Here are some issues that are a little different from other kinds of academic writing.
1575:
Shafee, Thomas; Das, Diptanshu; Masukume, Gwinyai; Häggström, Mikael (15 January 2017).
1431:
1184:
1524:
1498:
1449:
1413:
1289:
1202:
1006:
961:
829:
510:
483:
401:
379:
202:
183:
159:
17:
1246:
1655:
1641:
1317:
1001:
969:
965:
889:
763:
754:
750:
739:
735:
632:
433:
394:
249:
237:
187:
1324:
54:
It explains concepts or processes used by the Knowledge community. It is not one of
1224:
953:
743:
525:
521:
514:
513:
but that are not important enough to write up as separate research articles. Don't
718:
You don't need permission to add or remove content from Knowledge; Knowledge uses
1440:
1281:
1193:
800:
and intelligent accommodation can avoid and resolve communications difficulties.
651:
It is rarely necessary to type in the full citation information. Entering only a
236:
word processor, such as Microsoft Word, you may be more comfortable with the new
1397:
1042:
1011:
636:
448:
1515:
321:
1634:
1626:
1593:
1560:
1532:
1457:
1297:
1253:
1210:
635:, citation information is always entered by pressing the "Cite" button; in
400:
When you create or make significant changes to an article, you may want to
1577:"WikiJournal of Medicine, the first Knowledge-integrated academic journal"
371:
218:
858:
468:
456:
885:
773:. The editors using these tools may not be willing to take the time to
699:
683:
459:
is allowed, even if they are not your own work. See, for instance, the
297:
from established members of the community. You can ask for help at the
241:
233:
707:
668:
960:
with "a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject", from a
749:
Unlike some other sites, Knowledge does not permit any one editor to
687:
679:
639:, citation information may additionally be entered manually, between
1378:"Knowledge-integrated publishing: a comparison of successful models"
698:
directly from Zotero into Knowledge, no typing required. If you use
305:. You can even find an experienced Knowledge editor to act as your
1133:– an editor's guide to research on the subject of Knowledge itself
452:
274:
531:
Ideally, every paragraph of a Knowledge article (outside of the
245:
843:
template to render inline references made in the article body).
33:
762:. You need to be prepared for this, and avoid getting into a
671:
can tidy your citations, as long as they are comprehensible.
1356:"Wikimania (Knowledge) has changed my life | petermr's blog"
1037:
Knowledge articles can be submitted to WikiJournals via the
1131:
Knowledge:What are these researchers doing in my Knowledge?
575:
lecture notes and web pages as sources (but do use them in
543:
give more guidance on what does and doesn't need a source.
232:
There are two ways to edit. If you generally write using a
726:. If you disagree with someone's edits, the proper way to
1414:"Topic Pages: PLoS Computational Biology Meets Knowledge"
1334:
Three Reasons Why Earth Scientists Should Edit Knowledge
808:
The general style of Knowledge articles is laid out in
77:
420:. As an academic you will probably find little new in
320:. There is a global annual academic conference called
664:
91:
it might be helpful to know about before you start.
1220:"Knowledge wants more contributions from academics"
794:
editors with high-functioning autism and Asperger's
1106:Finding expert help or people needing expert help
659:to the publication will usually be enough to let
225:also allows pseudonymous accounts, which you may
868:Knowledge:Make technical articles understandable
814:Knowledge:Make technical articles understandable
374:, you can make it easier for fellow editors who
1121:Help:Knowledge editing for non-academic experts
29:Help:Knowledge editing for non-academic experts
1610:"The aims and scope of WikiJournal of Science"
1263:"Why Medical Schools Should Embrace Knowledge"
708:make a markup citation from a doi or some URLs
667:complete your citation. Failing that, another
8:
1667:Knowledge essays about experts and expertise
964:. While Knowledge is not a place to publish
520:Everything in Knowledge should ideally have
461:Commons:User:Open Access Media Importer Bot
1153:Help:Knowledge editing for medical experts
1147:Knowledge:WikiProject Medicine/How to edit
983:
734:principle, so you will need to leave your
1625:
1592:
1559:
1523:
1514:
1448:
1439:
1396:
1288:
1201:
1192:
1137:Knowledge:WikiJournal article nominations
1049:, the same charity that funds Knowledge.
948:Wikiversity:Go unto Wikimedia, academics!
393:There is no formal way to verify account
351:, and more specialized projects such as
1117:– Tutorials for Visual Editor and Markup
722:. All editors must avoid back-and-forth
282:, academic and Knowledge editor, giving
201:, but they are expected to write from a
1347:
1149:is specifically for medical researchers
986:
916:Knowledge:Manual of Style (mathematics)
553:Knowledge:Biographies of living persons
479:Sourcing, verifiability, and notability
353:Knowledge:WikiProject Academic Journals
1167:Ten simple rules for editing Knowledge
974:do this on Knowledge's sister projects
337:Knowledge:WikiProject Computer Science
199:no opinions in their area of expertise
428:are often grounded in the need for a
7:
970:synthesis of the research literature
760:know less than you about the subject
710:, which can be used in any browser.
182:as an editor and your contributions
58:, and may reflect varying levels of
1546:Butler, Declan (16 December 2008).
1376:Shafee, Thomas (24 November 2017).
956:— each article is meant to provide
934:Knowledge-integrated scholarly work
640:
388:Category:Wikipedian anthropologists
244:environment such as LaTeX, or know
873:Knowledge makes extensive use of "
599:Knowledge:Reliable source examples
56:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
25:
704:Knowledge BibDesk Export Template
629:two short "Referencing" tutorials
422:Knowledge's concept of plagiarism
341:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
197:Experts are not expected to have
178:, you are likely to get yourself
1548:"Publish in Knowledge or perish"
1318:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2011.01135.x
1084:
1066:
560:Knowledge:Notability (academics)
447:Copying (with attribution) from
37:
1608:Editorial Board (1 June 2018).
792:Knowledge has a fair number of
694:, you can change a setting and
678:hold citation information in a
333:Knowledge:WikiProject Chemistry
944:WP:Journal to wiki publication
940:WP:Wiki to journal publication
541:scientific citation guidelines
467:of copyright materials may be
430:Knowledge-compatible copyright
345:Knowledge:WikiProject Medicine
312:Many cities have face-to-face
248:markup, you may prefer to use
227:prefer to using your real name
1:
1247:10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30254-6
1218:Corbyn, Zoe (29 March 2011),
896:third-person pronoun, though.
434:from other Knowledge articles
349:Knowledge:WikiProject Physics
259:For markup, there is a quick
1441:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002446
1282:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001381
1194:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000941
1043:diamond/platinum open-access
906:Every article has a list of
818:in any particular discipline
720:post-publication peer review
562:for more detailed guidance.
309:while you learn the basics.
307:Knowledge-editing supervisor
148:does look good on your vita.
1398:10.13140/rg.2.2.27470.77129
1331:Goldstein, Evan B. (2017),
812:. A more specific guide is
609:topics are also available.
537:general citation guidelines
263:. There are also extensive
261:cheatsheet of common markup
170:in certain situations, but
1683:
1516:10.1016/j.gene.2016.04.053
1471:Luk, Ann (12 April 2017).
1419:PLOS Computational Biology
1172:PLOS Computational Biology
997:PLOS Computational Biology
937:
706:. There is also a tool to
616:
591:Knowledge:Reliable sources
550:
331:. Larger projects include
293:As in academia, newcomers
223:Wikimedia's privacy policy
209:How to get started editing
137:It looks good on your vita
67:
26:
1126:Knowledge:Manual of Style
1030:WikiJournal of Humanities
927:articles about algorithms
824:Articles are broken into
810:Knowledge:Manual of Style
631:. In summary, when using
533:initial summary paragraph
475:is available to editors.
158:) or their own research:
152:Your advisor asked you to
1235:The Lancet Global Health
1110:Knowledge:Expert editors
1091:A short presentation on
1073:A short presentation on
732:"evidence, not eminence"
627:You can take one of the
619:Knowledge:Citing sources
451:articles licensed under
1581:WikiJournal of Medicine
1041:. The WikiJournals are
1020:WikiJournal of Medicine
980:for the encyclopedia.
696:drag-and-drop citations
465:Attributed short quotes
378:to find you, by adding
303:variety of other places
18:User:David Eppstein/4RS
1614:WikiJournal of Science
1561:10.1038/news.2008.1312
1025:WikiJournal of Science
787:study of editor trends
777:in your edit, as they
702:, you can install the
601:. Specific guides for
432:. Copying and pasting
359:interests, browse the
290:
168:cite your own writings
131:Broaden your knowledge
1627:10.15347/wjs/2018.001
1594:10.15347/wjm/2017.001
1104:Knowledge:Expert help
1095:editing for academics
1077:editing for academics
962:neutral point of view
361:Wikiproject directory
278:
203:neutral point of view
192:conflicts of interest
1142:For medical topics:
1115:Help:Introduction to
1047:Wikimedia Foundation
804:Style and formatting
515:do this in Knowledge
473:Copyright assistance
438:closely paraphrasing
426:rules around copying
424:. Knowledge's other
384:expertise categories
288:Wikimania Conference
265:tutorials on editing
46:This help page is a
1432:2012PLSCB...8E2446W
1185:2010PLSCB...6E0941L
892:is acceptable as a
862:"Wagner's Theorem".
779:ideally ought to do
613:Citation formatting
511:trivial calculation
376:need your expertise
372:register a username
254:Special:Preferences
1016:The WikiJournals:
968:, nor an original
859:titles of sections
855:Titles of articles
676:citation templates
299:Knowledge:Teahouse
291:
271:Social connections
240:. If you prefer a
194:must be declared.
190:. As in academia,
1270:Academic Medicine
1054:
1053:
988:Examples include:
966:original research
766:when it happens.
692:reference manager
418:violate copyright
314:Knowledge meetups
280:Peter Murray-Rust
219:create an account
88:
87:
16:(Redirected from
1674:
1662:Knowledge how-to
1646:
1645:
1629:
1605:
1599:
1598:
1596:
1572:
1566:
1565:
1563:
1543:
1537:
1536:
1527:
1518:
1494:
1488:
1487:
1485:
1483:
1468:
1462:
1461:
1452:
1443:
1409:
1403:
1402:
1400:
1382:
1373:
1367:
1366:
1364:
1362:
1352:
1337:
1327:
1300:
1292:
1267:
1256:
1228:
1213:
1205:
1196:
1088:
1070:
1039:nominations page
984:
952:Knowledge is an
888:is discouraged.
842:
836:
798:bit of knowledge
744:reliable sources
674:In wiki markup,
647:
646:...</ref: -->
566:Choosing sources
80:
41:
40:
34:
21:
1682:
1681:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1607:
1606:
1602:
1574:
1573:
1569:
1545:
1544:
1540:
1496:
1495:
1491:
1481:
1479:
1470:
1469:
1465:
1426:(3): e1002446.
1411:
1410:
1406:
1380:
1375:
1374:
1370:
1360:
1358:
1354:
1353:
1349:
1344:
1330:
1303:
1265:
1259:
1232:
1217:
1179:(9), e1000941,
1164:
1161:
1159:Further reading
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1089:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1071:
1060:
1055:
989:
950:
936:
890:Singular "they"
840:
834:
806:
716:
621:
615:
578:Further reading
568:
555:
549:
481:
414:
295:may expect help
273:
211:
119:Righting wrongs
100:
84:
83:
76:
72:
64:
63:
38:
32:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1680:
1678:
1670:
1669:
1664:
1654:
1653:
1648:
1647:
1600:
1567:
1538:
1509:(2): 235–238.
1489:
1463:
1404:
1368:
1346:
1345:
1343:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1328:
1312:(3): 640–641,
1301:
1276:(2): 194–200,
1257:
1230:
1215:
1160:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1150:
1140:
1139:
1134:
1128:
1123:
1118:
1112:
1107:
1090:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1072:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1059:
1056:
1052:
1051:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1027:
1022:
1014:
1009:
1004:
999:
991:
990:
987:
982:
935:
932:
931:
930:
923:
919:
911:
904:
897:
894:gender-neutral
878:
871:
863:
852:
844:
805:
802:
715:
712:
614:
611:
593:, and for an
582:External links
573:self-published
567:
564:
548:
545:
506:
505:
497:
480:
477:
413:
410:
406:your watchlist
272:
269:
210:
207:
172:only sparingly
164:
163:
149:
134:
128:
122:
116:
110:
107:Public service
99:
96:
86:
85:
82:
81:
73:
68:
65:
53:
52:
44:
42:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1679:
1668:
1665:
1663:
1660:
1659:
1657:
1643:
1640:
1636:
1633:
1628:
1623:
1619:
1615:
1611:
1604:
1601:
1595:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1571:
1568:
1562:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1542:
1539:
1534:
1531:
1526:
1522:
1517:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1493:
1490:
1478:
1477:PLOS Biologue
1474:
1467:
1464:
1459:
1456:
1451:
1447:
1442:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1420:
1415:
1408:
1405:
1399:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1385:Health Inform
1379:
1372:
1369:
1357:
1351:
1348:
1341:
1336:
1335:
1329:
1326:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1302:
1299:
1296:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1264:
1258:
1255:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1231:
1227:
1226:
1221:
1216:
1212:
1209:
1204:
1200:
1195:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1173:
1168:
1163:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1151:
1148:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1138:
1135:
1132:
1129:
1127:
1124:
1122:
1119:
1116:
1113:
1111:
1108:
1105:
1102:
1101:
1094:
1087:
1076:
1069:
1057:
1050:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1031:
1028:
1026:
1023:
1021:
1018:
1017:
1015:
1013:
1010:
1008:
1005:
1003:
1002:PLOS Genetics
1000:
998:
995:
994:
993:
992:
985:
981:
977:
975:
971:
967:
963:
959:
955:
949:
945:
941:
933:
928:
924:
920:
917:
912:
909:
905:
902:
898:
895:
891:
887:
886:Second person
883:
879:
876:
872:
869:
864:
860:
856:
853:
850:
845:
839:
831:
830:first section
827:
823:
822:
821:
819:
815:
811:
803:
801:
799:
795:
790:
788:
784:
780:
776:
772:
767:
765:
761:
756:
752:
747:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
713:
711:
709:
705:
701:
697:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
672:
670:
666:
662:
661:Visual Editor
658:
654:
649:
644:
638:
634:
633:Visual Editor
630:
625:
620:
612:
610:
608:
604:
600:
596:
592:
586:
584:
583:
579:
574:
565:
563:
561:
554:
547:Living people
546:
544:
542:
538:
534:
529:
527:
523:
518:
516:
512:
503:
502:
498:
495:
494:
493:Verifiability
490:
489:
488:
485:
478:
476:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
445:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
411:
409:
407:
403:
398:
396:
391:
389:
385:
381:
380:your userpage
377:
373:
368:
366:
362:
356:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
325:
323:
319:
315:
310:
308:
304:
300:
296:
289:
285:
281:
277:
270:
268:
266:
262:
257:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
238:Visual Editor
235:
230:
228:
224:
220:
216:
208:
206:
204:
200:
195:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
176:self-promoter
173:
169:
161:
157:
153:
150:
146:
142:
138:
135:
132:
129:
126:
123:
120:
117:
114:
113:Give and take
111:
108:
105:
104:
103:
97:
95:
92:
79:
78:Help:Academic
75:
74:
71:
66:
61:
57:
51:
49:
43:
36:
35:
30:
19:
1617:
1613:
1603:
1584:
1580:
1570:
1551:
1541:
1506:
1502:
1492:
1480:. Retrieved
1476:
1466:
1423:
1417:
1407:
1388:
1384:
1371:
1359:. Retrieved
1350:
1333:
1309:
1305:
1273:
1269:
1241:(11): e791,
1238:
1234:
1225:The Guardian
1223:
1176:
1170:
1141:
1092:
1074:
1036:
978:
954:encyclopedia
951:
938:Main pages:
908:"Categories"
882:first person
848:
807:
791:
783:edit warring
775:fix problems
768:
751:take control
748:
724:edit warring
717:
673:
669:human editor
650:
626:
622:
587:
581:
577:
569:
556:
530:
519:
509:more than a
507:
499:
491:
482:
446:
415:
399:
392:
369:
357:
329:Wikiprojects
326:
318:Edit-a-thons
311:
292:
286:at the 2014
258:
231:
215:good reasons
212:
196:
165:
151:
136:
130:
124:
118:
112:
106:
101:
93:
89:
48:how-to guide
45:
1552:Nature News
1012:RNA Biology
958:its readers
901:WP:NOTHOWTO
740:credentials
714:Peer review
637:wiki markup
617:Main page:
551:Main page:
449:open access
395:credentials
250:wiki markup
160:not so good
1656:Categories
972:, you may
684:structured
603:scientific
597:approach,
501:Notability
386:, such as
1642:189736287
1635:2470-6345
1075:Knowledge
875:wikilinks
771:vandalism
755:consensus
595:inductive
526:footnotes
484:Citations
442:own words
322:Wikimania
60:consensus
1620:(1): 1.
1587:(1): 1.
1533:27150585
1482:21 March
1458:22479174
1325:83787883
1298:27627633
1254:27765289
1211:20941386
1093:Wikidata
1058:See also
826:sections
690:is your
686:way. If
469:fair use
457:CC BY-SA
125:Practice
70:Shortcut
1525:5944608
1450:3315447
1428:Bibcode
1361:19 July
1290:5265689
1203:2947980
1181:Bibcode
849:subject
838:reflist
728:resolve
700:Bibdesk
648:tags.
607:medical
522:sources
412:Copying
370:If you
242:WYSIWYM
234:WYSIWYG
188:deleted
180:blocked
156:example
946:; and
851:is..."
688:Zotero
682:-like
680:BibTeX
416:Don't
402:put it
365:search
301:and a
284:a talk
184:undone
1639:S2CID
1391:(2).
1381:(PDF)
1342:Notes
1322:S2CID
1266:(PDF)
922:true.
785:). A
764:fight
665:robot
663:or a
645:: -->
453:CC BY
440:your
363:, or
1632:ISSN
1530:PMID
1503:Gene
1484:2018
1455:PMID
1363:2024
1306:Ibis
1295:PMID
1251:PMID
1208:PMID
1007:Gene
925:For
880:The
857:and
796:. A
738:and
641:<
605:and
585:).
580:and
539:and
455:and
316:and
246:HTML
98:Why?
1622:doi
1589:doi
1556:doi
1521:PMC
1511:doi
1507:592
1446:PMC
1436:doi
1393:doi
1314:doi
1310:153
1286:PMC
1278:doi
1243:doi
1199:PMC
1189:doi
1169:",
976:.
736:ego
657:URL
655:or
653:doi
643:ref
517:.
404:on
382:to
355:.
335:,
267:.
229:.
217:to
186:or
145:NSF
141:see
1658::
1637:.
1630:.
1616:.
1612:.
1583:.
1579:.
1554:.
1550:.
1528:.
1519:.
1505:.
1501:.
1475:.
1453:.
1444:.
1434:.
1422:.
1416:.
1389:26
1387:.
1383:.
1320:,
1308:,
1293:,
1284:,
1274:92
1272:,
1268:,
1249:,
1237:,
1222:,
1206:,
1197:,
1187:,
1175:,
942:;
841:}}
835:{{
471:.
408:.
390:.
367:.
347:,
343:,
339:,
324:.
256:.
221:.
205:.
1644:.
1624::
1618:1
1597:.
1591::
1585:4
1564:.
1558::
1535:.
1513::
1486:.
1460:.
1438::
1430::
1424:8
1401:.
1395::
1365:.
1316::
1280::
1245::
1239:4
1229:.
1214:.
1191::
1183::
1177:6
918:.
903:.
870:.
162:.
62:.
50:.
31:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.