121:
members to help themselves and while it is not completely full of social support if you do your due diligence you can find the right way to create articles and other members will eventually come along and help with the article. As far as online communities go, Knowledge is pretty average in that some aspects are great while others lack a bit. Knowledge is one that many people know exist but few people actually get involved in and I am glad to be a part of the
Knowledge community now. Even if I do not contribute again to the encyclopedia again, I will always know that I have an account, that I can log in and make edits if I want, and that I have made a difference in the knowledge of the history of the bodybuilding world.
61:, etc.) it was simple to Google how to do it and I found that my page flew together in less than 36 hours. While the search bar at the top of Knowledge is sensitive to the exact words that are being searched for and a lot of my searches proved to be fruitless, Googling what I wanted to do always brought up a very helpful, and often wordy, explanation of how to do it along with a bunch of other related things I could do. In this way, Knowledge provides an explanation for all things imaginable to do within articles and helps its users through the beginning struggles of figuring out a site. After looking at other bodybuilder’s articles on Knowledge, I realized I should have a table of the competitions
87:
an online community that can provide lots of interactions with other members and as Kraut and
Resnick (2011) discuss “combining contribution with social contact with other contributors causes members to contribute more.” When starting out I was unsure how I felt about other Wikipedians being able to edit the article I was writing but as I heard about the horrors of other people’s articles getting tagged for deletion or Knowledge wars I was suddenly very happy to have zero interactions and only my username on the edit history for the
108:
for deletion or as an orphan, if it had been I would have approached it in thinking that the moderators are trying to make
Knowledge as good as possible, instead of believing that they were being malicious about the article. That being said, Knowledge does have “consistently applied moderation criteria, a chance to argue one’s case, and appeal procedures increase the legitimacy and thus the effectiveness of moderation decisions” which would allow me to argue any of the tags that could have been placed on the article.
92:
complementary or contingent contributions… ” and I found this was true. When I saw that other people were interested in the article I was working on and were making minor edits or putting it in categories I was excited because I finally felt like I was making a worthwhile page and helping to build on the knowledge that is open to the general public.
27:
communities, arguably because I wasn’t a part of one. That has changed now and I am now proud to say that I am a part of the
Knowledge community and have contributed to the largest online encyclopedia as well as uncovered a bit of history that the bodybuilding world has kept quiet. This essay delves into Kraut and Resnick’s
103:
made can be seen. Bamyers99 only made a few minor edits in the article and added a few categories, but even these small changes motivated me to keep working on the article because I could see that other people were interested in it. While I don’t foresee myself writing any other
Knowledge articles,
91:
article I was working on. But suddenly, I wasn’t the only editor… I logged in one day to make some edits and saw that someone had been making changes. And it was great! As Kraut and
Resnick suggest “people will be more willing to contribute to an online community if they see that others are making
107:
Another aspect of interaction is how
Knowledge is moderated. Kraut and Resnick suggest that “moderation decided by people who are members of the community… is perceived as more legitimate and thus is more effective.” While the page that I was working on did not have any issues such as being tagged
86:
Online communities can provide social support and interactions if you find the right one. These online interactions can make or break a member’s experience on the online community and can be the difference in whether or not the member decides to stay with the community. Knowledge is an example of
120:
article that I worked on this semester. While
Knowledge does not make it simple for newcomers, it is clear that there are practices in place to help anyone who is actually interested in contributing to the site. The site is not particularly user friend but it has enough information there for new
49:
easily visible increases the likelihood that the community will provide them..” If this list had not existed or if I had not been able to find it I would have floundered. I greatly appreciated that
Knowledge helps its new (and inexperienced) users by providing this list of potential articles.
48:
essay prompts. Luckily
Knowledge came to the rescue: Wikipedians have compiled a list of topics that still need articles and I was able to find it and then begin narrow down my search. Kraut and Resnick mentioned this in their discussion of contribution: “making the list of needed contributions
72:
Most projects I have to do have a set of criteria: a grading rubric, a suggested word count, a certain writing style to use. Knowledge was clearly different. There is no word count suggested, the writing style should be “neutral,” and Knowledge editors can choose from a multitude of citation
153:
28:
26:
I signed up for this class because I had to. Not because I had any interest in Knowledge or any other online community, but because a capstone class is required and the one I wanted to take was pulled from the schedule. I would even go so far as to say that I had zero interest in online
104:
I can imagine making minor changes on pages as I come across them, just as Bamyers99 did for me. The small contribution lets the person on the other side of the article know that other people are interested in helping and makes the effort they are putting in feel worthwhile.
73:
options. I was overwhelmed and felt as though Knowledge was doing a bad job of “providing members with specific and highly challenging goals, whether self-set or system-suggested" which usually "increases contributions.” Then I came across the
43:
provided was picked apart and chosen from quickly by my classmates – which was fine because I knew I wouldn’t put my due effort in unless I found a topic I actually cared about. But that left the topic even more open ended than Professor
77:
link and suddenly I had something to work with. Without that information I would have continued to struggle on what was turning into quite a troublesome project and I was very thankful Knowledge set this goal for all articles.
52:
Once my topic was set in stone (approximately one month after I was supposed to choose and two days before it was supposed to go live) the process was nothing but exciting. When I wasn’t sure how to do something
31:
to explore whether Knowledge should be considered a successful online community considering the extent that it is user friendly, provides social interactions, and encourages members to join and stay.
179:
163:
39:
After getting over the initial shock that I had to write a Knowledge article for this class, I struggled to choose a topic. The list that
58:
65:
had competed in. The template and instructions that I found on Knowledge helped me go from a basic paragraph about his training to
116:
While my time on Knowledge has been short, I think it is fair to say that I will continue to log in occasionally and check on the
74:
173:
159:
40:
100:
17:
117:
88:
62:
45:
158:. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
96:
66:
8:
178:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
147:
145:
143:
141:
139:
137:
135:
133:
129:
59:create a link to another Knowledge page
171:
155:Building Successful Online Communities
29:Building Successful Online Communities
7:
24:
152:Kraut, R.E., Resnick, P. (2011).
1:
200:
69:in only a few steps.
99:, the changes that
67:adding a full table
165:978-0-262-01657-5
35:User Friendliness
191:
184:
183:
177:
169:
149:
199:
198:
194:
193:
192:
190:
189:
188:
187:
170:
166:
151:
150:
131:
127:
114:
84:
75:perfect article
37:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
197:
195:
186:
185:
164:
128:
126:
123:
113:
110:
83:
80:
36:
33:
23:
18:User:Enarowski
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
196:
181:
175:
167:
161:
157:
156:
148:
146:
144:
142:
140:
138:
136:
134:
130:
124:
122:
119:
118:Roy Hilligenn
111:
109:
105:
102:
98:
93:
90:
89:Roy Hilligenn
81:
79:
76:
70:
68:
64:
63:Roy Hilligenn
60:
56:
50:
47:
42:
34:
32:
30:
19:
154:
115:
106:
95:In the diff
94:
85:
82:Interactions
71:
54:
51:
38:
25:
41:Amanda Rust
125:References
174:cite book
101:Bamyers99
46:Reagle’s
55:italics
162:
112:Ending
16:<
180:link
160:ISBN
97:here
176:}}
172:{{
132:^
57:,
182:)
168:.
53:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.