750:
another editor will then trawl the internet for negative information and add it to the article. Unless this information is demonstrably false, or creates a strong bias, there is nothing you can do about this. Editors who wish to use
Knowledge (XXG) to promote themselves or their organisation should think carefully about whether this is a sensible move, particularly if a page has not already been created.
1229:, where underlying conflicts of interest may aggravate editorial disagreements. In this scenario, it may be easy to make claims about conflict of interest. Do not use conflict of interest as an excuse to gain the upper hand in a content dispute. When conflicts exist, invite the conflicted editor to contribute to the article talk page, and give their views fair consideration.
45:
110:
961:
Removal of reliably sourced critical material is not usually permitted. Accounts of public controversies, if backed by reliable sources, form an integral part of
Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage. Slanting the balance of articles as a form of defence of some figure, group, institution, or product is bad for
749:
Balance is an important quality of
Knowledge (XXG), and many editors who come across an article skewed a particular way will try to balance it out. If you create an article on your organisation, or add large amounts of positive information to an existing article, there is a very real possibility that
695:
Conflicts of interest are not a problem in themselves; they only become a problem when they adversely affect the quality of
Knowledge (XXG). Unfortunately this is fairly common, particularly with editors who are new to Knowledge (XXG). An editor whose motives for editing steer them away from the goal
594:
arise in
Knowledge (XXG) when an editor's financial interests, personal life, or opinions have the potential to conflict with the aims and spirit of Knowledge (XXG). Examples include people who are paid to edit Knowledge (XXG), people editing pages which relate to them or something close to them, and
953:
If the page is biased rather than inaccurate, it is a good idea to get feedback from other editors. What seems biased to you might be reasonable to people who aren't so close to the subject. Make your case on the talk page, and be honest about your relationship to the article's subject. If there are
753:
Another likely consequence is the public exposure of such editing. There have been many cases of companies and politicians caught editing their own pages; this is often seen by the public as underhanded and improper behaviour, regardless of the actual quality of the edits. To avoid any suggestion of
966:, for example, when 90% of an article about a particular company discusses a lawsuit one client once brought against it. In such a case, such material should be condensed by a neutral editor, and the other sections expanded. One of the best ways to go about this is to request this on the talk page.
670:
This page tends to focus on instances in which an editor has a close real world relationship with the subject of an article. However, conflicts of interest can also arise in other cases, for example if an editor is a particularly enthusiastic fan of a sports team, band, actor or similar, or if they
1100:
problems in and of themselves, only when they interfere with the aims and quality of
Knowledge (XXG). Conflicts of interest frequently lead to breaches of Knowledge (XXG) policy, but the problem is the breach of policy, not the conflict of interest. It is in Knowledge (XXG)'s interests for editors
1057:
Also remember that other editors have no way of knowing that you really are the expert you claim to be. Insisting that your edit is the right one because 'I am an authority on this' is usually counter-productive. Annoying as it may be, even if you are the world authority on a subject, you have no
1045:
Editing in an area in which you have professional or academic expertise is not, in itself, a conflict of interest. Using material you yourself have written or published is allowed within reason, but only if it is notable and conforms to the content policies (in particular, see the guidelines on
989:
Once media files are uploaded to
Commons, they can then be incorporated into Knowledge (XXG) articles where appropriate. To get an idea of what would be appropriate, look at pages on similar topics. Bear in mind that Knowledge (XXG) is not obliged to use your preferred image, particularly if it
654:
suggest in good faith that you may have a conflict of interest, try to identify and minimize your biases, and consider withdrawing from editing the article. As a rule of thumb, the more involvement you have with a topic in real life, the more careful you should be with our core content policies
1187:
Who has written the material should be irrelevant so long as these policies are closely adhered to. The imputation of conflict of interest is not by itself a good reason to remove sound material from articles. However, an apparent conflict of interest is a good reason for close review by the
766:
Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia, not a forum for advertising or self-promotion, or a vanity press. As such, it should contain only material that complies with its content policies, and
Wikipedians must place the interests of the encyclopedia first. When editors write to promote their own
1294:
In the happy version of the ending, otrs/the office comes in and reminds everyone to act with love and neutrality to write a good article which is acceptable to both reasonable critics and reasonable supporters of the company... reliance on solid sources, neutral language, etc. carries the
1141:, where experienced editors may be able to help you resolve the matter without recourse to publishing assertions and accusations on Knowledge (XXG). Using COI allegations to harass an editor or to gain the upper hand in a content dispute is prohibited, and can result in a block or ban.
954:
reputable third party sources which can counter the bias, mention them. If other editors agree that there is bias, they will make the changes themselves or encourage you to do so. If there is no agreement and you still feel that the page is biased, your options are set out at
729:
Bad editing such as described above will generally be reverted, regardless of the motivation behind it. In serious or persistant cases, particularly if the account appears to exist solely for promotional purposes, accounts will be blocked. Accounts may also be blocked for
595:
those with strong political, religious or other views. Having a conflict of interest need not be a problem in itself, and it need not prevent anyone from editing any page. But if such editors are not especially careful they may breach
Knowledge (XXG) policy, particularly
977:
encourages anyone to upload digital media files, such as photographs, illustrations, audio files and video clips, so long as the media is of good quality, is in a format we use, and the copyright holder is willing do so under one of the free licenses we accept. (See
1071:
slip up in neutrality in a court-case article on
Knowledge (XXG) for an active case-in-progress could potentially be noticed by the courts or their parties, and this could potentially cause real-world harm, not just harm to Knowledge (XXG). Because of this, we
786:
If other editors suggest that your editing violates Knowledge (XXG)'s standards, take that advice seriously and consider stepping back, reassessing your edits, and discussing your intentions with the community. In particular, consider whether you are editing
935:
explaining the situation and referring to your reputable source. If you can't find a reputable source you can publish a statement on your official website and refer to this, but be aware that the Knowledge (XXG) page might end up reading 'X denied that...'
794:
Editors with clear conflicts of interest should be open about them, ideally both on their user page and on the talk page of relevant Knowledge (XXG) pages. Although this may lead to increased scrunity of such users' edits, they will also benefit from the
1152:
takes precedence over this guideline. COI situations are usually revealed when the editor themselves discloses a relationship to the subject that they are editing. In case the editor does not identity themselves or their affiliation, reference to the
1191:
For an article about something obviously important, but which was written with too much bias to easily edit, it is often possible to reduce an article to the basic identifying information and then neutral editors can help the article to be improved.
682:
takes precedence over this guideline. COI situations are usually revealed when the editor themselves discloses a relationship to the subject that they are editing. In case the editor does not identify themselves or their affiliation, reference to the
1008:
Only add an external link to a Knowledge (XXG) page if it genuinely provides useful information on that topic. It is also acceptable to add a link to a subject's official webpage from its Knowledge (XXG) page. Unacceptable types of link include:
1066:
If you are involved in a court case, or close to one of the litigants, you would find it very hard to demonstrate that what you wrote about a party or a law firm associated with the case, or a related area of law, was entirely objective. Even a
767:
interests, their contributions often show a characteristic lack of connection to anything the general reader might want to consult as a reference. If you do write an article on an area in which you are personally involved, be sure to write in a
896:
guarantee, promise or imply that you can exercise any kind of control over Knowledge (XXG)'s content or tone. Trying to fulfill this is likely to lead to disruptive or otherwise inappropriate editing, and will probably get you blocked.
754:
impropriety, editors with obvious conflicts of interest are strongly encouraged to declare their conflict of interest on their user page and ideally also on the talk pages of pages that they edit. Editors should always remember that
1319:
799:
and most other editors will appreciate their honesty. Especially when they are not experienced Knowledge (XXG) editors, they may want to limit their editing to talk pages, and suggest that other editors make changes.
671:
have strong opinions about a particular political, religious or other issue. If your edits are motivated more by promoting an organization or cause than improving Knowledge (XXG), you have a conflict of interest.
881:. In these cases, the article is normally moved into the user namespace rather than deleted. If you wish to write about yourself without working on the encyclopedia, consider starting a website or a blog instead.
1544:
306:
610:
There is no rule or policy against conflict of interest editing, but editors with a conflict of interest must take special care to abide by the spirit and letter of all Knowledge (XXG) policies. In particular:
1184:. All editors are expected to stick closely to these policies when creating and evaluating material, and to respect the good faith actions of others who edit content to ensure it complies with these policies.
118:
Do not edit Knowledge (XXG) to promote your own interests, or those of other individuals or of organizations, including employers, unless you are certain that the interests of Knowledge (XXG) remain paramount.
1397:
1791:
1383:
1706:
855:. When you create the page, it is a good idea to make a note on the associated talk page declaring your relationship to the subject. Do not imply that you will revert edits you do not approve of.
195:
616:
Editors who have joined Knowledge (XXG) solely to write about themselves or something they are involved in should (like other new editors) familiarise themselves with Knowledge (XXG) policy
1101:
with conflicts of interest to be open about them; if such editors are not breaking any policies or being disruptive they should be monitored but otherwise treated like any other editor.
2038:
376:
892:
If you are being paid to edit Knowledge (XXG) on behalf of someone else, it is important that you and your boss/client realise you cannot control anyone's image on Knowledge (XXG).
1088:
policy, even if you do not have a neutral point of view. Remember that the other side has as much right to use Knowledge (XXG) as you do, even if you think they're clearly wrong.
833:
1537:
282:
1964:
453:
353:
1376:
1270:
Self-righteous Wikipedian responds in anger against the attempt to "censor" or "whitewash" by yelling at the company and forcing the article back to a hatchet job status.
982:) While Commons prefers full resolution media, reduced resolution images are acceptable when the copyright owner is unwilling to freely license a full quality image. See
650:
Closeness to a subject does not mean you're incapable of being neutral, but it is difficult to avoid all bias. Be guided by the advice of other editors: If editors on a
908:
If there is inaccurate, unflattering and unsourced information about you or any other living person on any page you may remove it immediately, as per Knowledge (XXG)'s
1262:
The company arrives, is (justifiably) horrified and angered by the hatchet job. They respond without experience, clumsily, by trying to force a change to a whitewash.
962:
the encyclopedia. This is also the case if you find an article overwhelmed with correctly referenced, but exclusively negative information. This may present a case of
1129:
The first approach should be direct discussion of the issue with the editor, referring to this guideline. If persuasion fails, consider whether you are involved in a
462:
1084:
Activities regarded by insiders as simply "getting the word out" may appear promotional or propagandistic to the outside world. Always abide by Knowledge (XXG)'s
1997:
755:
1721:
1369:
1215:
1105:
190:
125:
931:- if your edit comes across like a publicity statement it will probably be reversed. If you don't want to edit the page yourself, leave a note on the page's
2198:
157:
52:
1992:
1731:
1473:
944:
632:
If your edits lower the quality of Knowledge (XXG) or serve no other purpose other than to promote their subject, they will be reverted and you may be
2012:
1798:
1667:
696:
of creating a neutral encyclopedia can make a number of mistakes, many of which can lead to being barred from editing. Some common problems include:
434:
578:
912:
policy. In particularly serious cases, such as libel, the inclusion of private information such as telephone numbers, and copyright violation, see
330:
258:
2283:
2095:
476:
399:
1985:
413:
1468:
1165:
882:
2017:
1393:
367:
2007:
2002:
423:
2022:
1959:
1463:
1306:. Even if the changes they advocate are hopelessly biased, treat them with respect and courtesy, refer to policy and sources, and be
1226:
1201:
1177:
820:
The first step is to ask yourself whether your topic genuinely meets Knowledge (XXG)'s notability guidelines. To check this, see the
768:
656:
418:
1736:
1696:
1637:
1554:
1482:
1458:
1173:
1040:
660:
311:
240:
175:
943:
and will be removed promptly from the site. Those who post here in this fashion will also be subject to administrative sanction.
1632:
1205:
837:
788:
231:
134:
1144:
Knowledge (XXG) places importance on both the neutrality of articles and the ability of editors to edit pseudonymously. Do not
2228:
2048:
1726:
1701:
1647:
1134:
955:
848:
829:
528:
523:
514:
483:
358:
321:
301:
217:
185:
180:
143:
34:
923:
that the information is false or misleading, you have two options. One is to simply change it yourself, making sure to add a
68:
2090:
1866:
1813:
1786:
1716:
1691:
1219:
471:
207:
170:
877:
In some cases, Knowledge (XXG) users write articles about themselves when the more appropriate action would be to create a
1302:
Remember: an editor with a self-evident interest in the matter turning up on the talk page is an indication that they are
2213:
1662:
1657:
1627:
1532:
1488:
1416:
1356:
1334:
979:
443:
294:
277:
148:
60:
2175:
571:
2293:
1980:
1861:
1781:
1564:
1559:
1130:
940:
731:
408:
316:
289:
2043:
1949:
1904:
1856:
1851:
1569:
1527:
1493:
1204:, disparaging comments may fly about the subject of the article/author and the author's motives. These may border on
1003:
386:
381:
272:
267:
2287:
2277:
1937:
1522:
1453:
1169:
772:
664:
604:
222:
2261:
1222:, and start from the idea that the contributor was genuinely trying to help increase Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage.
858:
If you monitor the page, you will usually see other people make edits. Do not undo these unless they are clearly
1932:
1652:
1642:
1409:
1351:
545:
343:
1340:
825:
1803:
448:
2170:
564:
2237:
2102:
1741:
1617:
1549:
1517:
1478:
1181:
1013:
Links that appear to promote products by pointing to obscure or not particularly relevant commercial sites.
924:
821:
796:
623:
596:
549:
488:
245:
212:
1584:
950:
Any editor can and should correct spelling or grammar, or revert obvious vandalism, without consultation.
2107:
1808:
1711:
1622:
1612:
1161:
932:
913:
878:
859:
651:
619:
553:
493:
202:
2119:
2114:
1607:
1024:
871:
735:
505:
500:
77:
64:
26:
1430:
1299:
In reality, Act Five often ends up cycling back through Acts One through Four. This is a Bad Thing.
1050:). Excessive self-citation is strongly discouraged. When in doubt, defer to the community's opinion.
1954:
1944:
1051:
1047:
701:
348:
1283:
1149:
1145:
920:
844:. Be aware that if your topic does not clearly meet these guidelines, it is likely to be deleted.
679:
675:
1758:
991:
30:
1028:
963:
633:
1019:
Biographical material that does not significantly add to the clarity or quality of the article.
1016:
Links that appear to promote otherwise obscure individuals by pointing to their personal pages.
862:
or demonstrably untrue. When undoing other people's edits you should always explain why in the
2180:
974:
939:
An entire article that presents as an attack piece or hostile journalism can be nominated for
863:
1346:
1279:
1242:
1154:
1138:
1085:
928:
852:
776:
743:
717:
684:
643:
600:
547:
2271:
1361:
1343:
lists proposed edits for review where the proposer has a self-reported conflict of interest.
646:. The writing of 'puff pieces' and advertisements on Knowledge (XXG) is strictly prohibited.
1123:
916:
for information on getting this removed from the page history as well as the page itself.
909:
867:
841:
739:
2160:
1324:
1122:
although other problems with the article arising from a conflict of interest may be valid
1112:
630:
All editors must remember that Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia, not a promotional tool.
780:
742:. Editors are also reminded that creating a new account in order to get around a block (
2267:
958:. Bear in mind that none of these will necessarily resolve things in the way you want.
537:
17:
1208:, and may discourage the article's creator from making future valuable contributions.
642:. All Knowledge (XXG) articles should contain useful information written as if from a
1828:
674:
When investigating possible cases of COI editing, Wikipedians must be careful not to
2137:
1330:
710:
Adding text in a tone inappropriate for an encyclopaedia, in particular 'PR speak'.
2165:
713:
Adding trivial or irrelevant information for the purpose of promoting the subject.
1333:
for tagging articles affected by conflict of interest that may be candidates for
1254:
Someone writes a hatchet job about a company with a less than stellar reputation.
901:
The page on my company/band/self is inaccurate, biased, defamatory or out of date
1881:
947:
gives details on how biographical articles on living persons should be written.
758:
and anything you do in it may end up on the front page of your local newspaper.
707:
Removing information which is unflattering to the editor or their organisation.
1104:
Problems resulting from suspected conflict of interest may be reported on the
640:
Editors should not create articles which serve solely to promote their subject
970:
The image Knowledge (XXG) is using of me/my product/my friend is unflattering
851:, and familiarise yourself with Knowledge (XXG) policy, particularly that on
1320:
Knowledge (XXG):Contact us/Article problem/Factual error (from enterprise)
886:
1247:
There is a little drama that is enacted more often than it should be.
847:
If your topic is notable and you are not an experienced editor, read
1062:
I want to make an edit relating to a court case I am involved with
983:
927:
indicating your reputable source. Remember to write as if from a
746:) is banned, and new accounts of this type will also be blocked.
551:
1365:
554:
2278:
User:Uncle G/On notability#Writing about subjects close to you
1327:
for warning editors who have an apparent conflict of interest.
104:
39:
1148:
in order to prove a conflict of interest. Knowledge (XXG)'s
870:, even if you are its creator and its subject. Try to avoid
2067:
866:. Remember that you have no special rights over the page;
1212:
Avoid using the word "vanity" or similar judgmental terms
1120:
Conflict of interest is not a reason to delete an article
1023:
Adding inappropriate links to multiple pages is known as
919:
In other cases, if you can demonstrate by reference to a
124:
For specific examples where you may be able to help, see
63:
may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect
801:
92:
85:
2280:. On writing about subjects that are close to oneself.
1218:. It is not helpful, nor reason to delete an article.
1137:
may help. Another option is to initiate discussion at
1054:
should be used with caution, and avoided if possible.
1707:
Do not disrupt Knowledge (XXG) to illustrate a point
1164:
is subject to rules covering criteria for articles (
700:
Creating pages on subjects which are not adequately
2145:
2132:
2075:
2065:
2031:
1973:
1913:
1889:
1879:
1836:
1826:
1766:
1756:
1676:
1592:
1582:
1502:
1438:
1428:
2264:. The risks of trying to subvert Knowledge (XXG).
998:I want to link to my website from Knowledge (XXG)
1545:Do not include copies of lengthy primary sources
813:I want to create a page on my business/band/self
126:Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest/Noticeboard
1092:Dealing with editors with conflicts of interest
1080:I want to raise awareness of a particular cause
51:This page documents an English Knowledge (XXG)
1200:During debates in articles' talk pages and at
1058:special rights over its Knowledge (XXG) page.
1377:
1160:All text created in the Knowledge (XXG) main
1041:WP:No original research § Citing oneself
945:Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons
804:is an example of an editor taking this path.
572:
8:
2296:. About interests that may not be conflicts.
2133:
1225:Another case is within disputes relating to
29:redirects here. You may also be looking for
2039:Categories, lists, and navigation templates
1076:editing when this type of conflict exists.
1035:I am a recognised authority in this subject
59:Editors should generally follow it, though
2284:Knowledge (XXG):Search engine optimization
2142:
2072:
1925:
1886:
1833:
1763:
1589:
1435:
1384:
1370:
1362:
691:Problems with conflict of interest editing
579:
565:
337:
164:
130:
771:and cite reliable, third-party published
1096:Remember that conflicts of interest are
716:Adding irrelevant or promotional links (
1188:community to identify any subtle bias.
536:
513:
461:
433:
398:
366:
329:
257:
230:
156:
133:
454:Deletion guidelines for administrators
1027:and can result in your account being
980:Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses
657:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view
7:
1157:may help counteract biased editing.
830:bands and other music-related topics
775:, and beware of unintentional bias.
756:Knowledge (XXG) is in the real world
687:may help counteract biased editing.
661:Knowledge (XXG):No original research
2199:List of all policies and guidelines
1108:, and users may be warned with the
817:Further information: ], ], ], and ]
667:— when editing in that area.
2238:Summaries of values and principles
2078:
1916:
1679:
1505:
1180:); as well as the Knowledge (XXG)
1146:out an editor's real life identity
956:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution
849:Knowledge (XXG):Your first article
67:. When in doubt, discuss first on
35:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution
24:
678:other editors. Knowledge (XXG)'s
2148:
1892:
1839:
1769:
1722:Please do not bite the newcomers
1595:
1441:
1357:Knowledge (XXG):FAQ/Organization
1106:conflict of interest noticeboard
108:
43:
2294:Knowledge (XXG):Vested interest
1214:— this is accusatory and
808:Conflict of interest situations
620:five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
1133:. If so, an early recourse to
1:
1732:Responding to threats of harm
1474:Biographies of living persons
921:reputable, third party source
910:Biographies of Living Persons
665:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability
197:Don't disrupt to make a point
1799:Criteria for speedy deletion
1668:Paid-contribution disclosure
1352:Knowledge (XXG):Reward board
1155:neutral point of view policy
905:Further information: ] and ]
822:general notability guideline
779:is one of Knowledge (XXG)'s
685:neutral point of view policy
377:Categories, lists, templates
1469:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
1166:what Knowledge (XXG) is not
986:for detailed requirements.
834:organizations and companies
826:subject-specific guidelines
218:Other behavioral guidelines
2311:
2288:search engine optimization
1240:
1227:non-neutral points of view
1038:
1001:
904:
816:
135:Knowledge (XXG) guidelines
123:
75:
69:this guideline's talk page
25:
2262:User:Durova/The dark side
2193:
1928:
1404:
1168:); encyclopedic quality (
1150:policy against harassment
680:policy against harassment
223:WMF friendly space policy
1341:Category:Requested edits
1278:Company comes crying to
797:assumption of good faith
359:Other editing guidelines
322:Other content guidelines
191:Don't bite the newcomers
116:This page in a nutshell:
2176:Licensing and copyright
1394:policies and guidelines
1176:); editorial approach (
1118:user warning template.
1052:Self-published sources
883:Knowledge (XXG) is not
2171:Friendly space policy
2066:Project content
1960:Broad-concept article
1464:Neutral point of view
1202:articles for deletion
1178:neutral point of view
1124:criteria for deletion
1086:neutral point of view
992:artificially improved
990:appears to have been
929:neutral point of view
853:neutral point of view
777:Neutral point of view
644:neutral point of view
636:from further editing.
624:notability guidelines
601:neutral point of view
592:Conflicts of interest
307:Don't copy long texts
1737:Talk page guidelines
1697:Conflict of interest
1638:Ownership of content
1483:Copyright violations
1459:No original research
1392:Knowledge (XXG) key
1347:Knowledge (XXG):Spam
802:This disclosure note
241:Talk page guidelines
176:Conflict of interest
53:behavioral guideline
1633:No personal attacks
1555:Don't create hoaxes
1304:playing it straight
1074:strongly discourage
618:, particularly the
312:Don't create hoaxes
2229:List of guidelines
2049:Template namespace
1727:Courtesy vanishing
1702:Disruptive editing
1648:Dispute resolution
1135:dispute resolution
524:Naming conventions
302:Offensive material
186:Disruptive editing
181:Courtesy vanishing
31:Help:Edit conflict
2247:
2246:
2189:
2188:
2128:
2127:
2091:Project namespace
2061:
2060:
2057:
2056:
1998:Dates and numbers
1965:Understandability
1875:
1874:
1827:Enforcement
1822:
1821:
1814:Revision deletion
1787:Proposed deletion
1752:
1751:
1717:Gaming the system
1692:Assume good faith
1578:
1577:
1220:Assume good faith
1174:original research
1004:WP:External links
975:Wikimedia Commons
868:you do not own it
589:
588:
394:
393:
354:Understandability
253:
252:
208:Gaming the system
171:Assume good faith
122:
121:
103:
102:
2302:
2272:public relations
2224:
2223:
2214:List of policies
2209:
2208:
2166:List of policies
2153:
2152:
2151:
2143:
2139:
2135:
2083:
2082:
2081:
2073:
2069:
1926:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1887:
1883:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1834:
1830:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1764:
1760:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1663:Child protection
1658:No legal threats
1628:Ignore all rules
1600:
1599:
1598:
1590:
1586:
1533:Reliable sources
1510:
1509:
1508:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1436:
1432:
1417:Ignore all rules
1399:
1386:
1379:
1372:
1363:
1206:personal attacks
1182:copyright policy
1117:
1111:
1048:reliable sources
581:
574:
567:
555:
444:Deletion process
338:
297:
296:Non-free content
278:Reliable sources
198:
165:
131:
112:
111:
105:
95:
88:
47:
46:
40:
2310:
2309:
2305:
2304:
2303:
2301:
2300:
2299:
2286:. An essay for
2270:. Guidance for
2258:
2256:Further reading
2253:
2248:
2243:
2221:
2220:
2206:
2205:
2185:
2149:
2147:
2124:
2079:
2077:
2053:
2027:
1981:Manual of Style
1969:
1917:
1915:
1909:
1893:
1891:
1871:
1867:Page protection
1840:
1838:
1818:
1782:Deletion policy
1770:
1768:
1748:
1680:
1678:
1672:
1596:
1594:
1574:
1565:Patent nonsense
1560:Fringe theories
1506:
1504:
1498:
1442:
1440:
1424:
1400:
1390:
1325:Template:Uw-coi
1316:
1245:
1239:
1198:
1131:content dispute
1115:
1109:
1094:
1082:
1064:
1043:
1037:
1006:
1000:
984:Commons:Welcome
972:
941:speedy deletion
906:
903:
824:as well as the
818:
815:
810:
764:
727:
693:
585:
556:
552:
550:
548:
463:Project content
409:Manual of Style
317:Patent nonsense
295:
290:Fringe theories
196:
144:Guidelines list
129:
109:
99:
98:
91:
84:
80:
72:
57:
44:
38:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2308:
2306:
2298:
2297:
2291:
2281:
2275:
2268:User:Jmabel/PR
2265:
2257:
2254:
2252:
2249:
2245:
2244:
2242:
2241:
2234:
2233:
2232:
2217:
2194:
2191:
2190:
2187:
2186:
2184:
2183:
2181:Privacy policy
2178:
2173:
2168:
2163:
2157:
2155:
2140:
2130:
2129:
2126:
2125:
2123:
2122:
2117:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2100:
2099:
2098:
2087:
2085:
2070:
2063:
2062:
2059:
2058:
2055:
2054:
2052:
2051:
2046:
2044:Categorization
2041:
2035:
2033:
2032:Classification
2029:
2028:
2026:
2025:
2020:
2015:
2010:
2005:
2000:
1995:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1977:
1975:
1971:
1970:
1968:
1967:
1962:
1957:
1952:
1950:Disambiguation
1947:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1929:
1923:
1911:
1910:
1908:
1907:
1905:Editing policy
1901:
1899:
1884:
1877:
1876:
1873:
1872:
1870:
1869:
1864:
1859:
1854:
1852:Administrators
1848:
1846:
1831:
1824:
1823:
1820:
1819:
1817:
1816:
1811:
1806:
1801:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1784:
1778:
1776:
1761:
1757:Deletion
1754:
1753:
1750:
1749:
1747:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1734:
1729:
1724:
1719:
1714:
1709:
1704:
1699:
1694:
1688:
1686:
1674:
1673:
1671:
1670:
1665:
1660:
1655:
1650:
1645:
1640:
1635:
1630:
1625:
1620:
1615:
1610:
1604:
1602:
1587:
1580:
1579:
1576:
1575:
1573:
1572:
1570:External links
1567:
1562:
1557:
1552:
1547:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1530:
1528:Citing sources
1525:
1520:
1514:
1512:
1500:
1499:
1497:
1496:
1494:Article titles
1491:
1486:
1476:
1471:
1466:
1461:
1456:
1450:
1448:
1433:
1426:
1425:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1405:
1402:
1401:
1391:
1389:
1388:
1381:
1374:
1366:
1360:
1359:
1354:
1349:
1344:
1338:
1328:
1322:
1315:
1312:
1297:
1296:
1288:
1287:
1272:
1271:
1264:
1263:
1256:
1255:
1238:
1231:
1197:
1194:
1093:
1090:
1081:
1078:
1063:
1060:
1036:
1033:
1021:
1020:
1017:
1014:
999:
996:
971:
968:
902:
899:
814:
811:
809:
806:
763:
760:
740:revert warring
726:
723:
722:
721:
714:
711:
708:
705:
692:
689:
648:
647:
637:
627:
587:
586:
584:
583:
576:
569:
561:
558:
557:
546:
544:
541:
540:
534:
533:
532:
531:
526:
518:
517:
511:
510:
509:
508:
503:
498:
497:
496:
486:
481:
480:
479:
466:
465:
459:
458:
457:
456:
451:
446:
438:
437:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
421:
416:
403:
402:
396:
395:
392:
391:
390:
389:
387:Disambiguation
384:
382:Categorization
379:
371:
370:
368:Categorization
364:
363:
362:
361:
356:
351:
346:
334:
333:
327:
326:
325:
324:
319:
314:
309:
304:
299:
292:
287:
286:
285:
275:
273:External links
270:
268:Citing sources
262:
261:
255:
254:
251:
250:
249:
248:
243:
235:
234:
228:
227:
226:
225:
220:
215:
210:
205:
200:
193:
188:
183:
178:
173:
161:
160:
154:
153:
152:
151:
146:
138:
137:
120:
119:
113:
101:
100:
97:
96:
89:
81:
76:
73:
58:
48:
23:
18:User:Helenalex
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2307:
2295:
2292:
2289:
2285:
2282:
2279:
2276:
2273:
2269:
2266:
2263:
2260:
2259:
2255:
2250:
2240:
2239:
2235:
2231:
2230:
2225:
2218:
2216:
2215:
2210:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2200:
2196:
2195:
2192:
2182:
2179:
2177:
2174:
2172:
2169:
2167:
2164:
2162:
2159:
2158:
2156:
2154:
2144:
2141:
2131:
2121:
2118:
2116:
2113:
2109:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2101:
2097:
2094:
2093:
2092:
2089:
2088:
2086:
2084:
2074:
2071:
2064:
2050:
2047:
2045:
2042:
2040:
2037:
2036:
2034:
2030:
2024:
2021:
2019:
2016:
2014:
2011:
2009:
2006:
2004:
2001:
1999:
1996:
1994:
1993:Accessibility
1991:
1987:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1979:
1978:
1976:
1972:
1966:
1963:
1961:
1958:
1956:
1953:
1951:
1948:
1946:
1943:
1939:
1938:Summary style
1936:
1935:
1934:
1931:
1930:
1927:
1924:
1922:
1912:
1906:
1903:
1902:
1900:
1898:
1888:
1885:
1880:Editing
1878:
1868:
1865:
1863:
1860:
1858:
1855:
1853:
1850:
1849:
1847:
1845:
1835:
1832:
1825:
1815:
1812:
1810:
1807:
1805:
1802:
1800:
1797:
1793:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1785:
1783:
1780:
1779:
1777:
1775:
1765:
1762:
1755:
1743:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1735:
1733:
1730:
1728:
1725:
1723:
1720:
1718:
1715:
1713:
1710:
1708:
1705:
1703:
1700:
1698:
1695:
1693:
1690:
1689:
1687:
1685:
1675:
1669:
1666:
1664:
1661:
1659:
1656:
1654:
1651:
1649:
1646:
1644:
1641:
1639:
1636:
1634:
1631:
1629:
1626:
1624:
1621:
1619:
1616:
1614:
1611:
1609:
1606:
1605:
1603:
1601:
1591:
1588:
1583:Conduct
1581:
1571:
1568:
1566:
1563:
1561:
1558:
1556:
1553:
1551:
1548:
1546:
1543:
1539:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1531:
1529:
1526:
1524:
1523:Autobiography
1521:
1519:
1516:
1515:
1513:
1511:
1501:
1495:
1492:
1490:
1487:
1484:
1480:
1477:
1475:
1472:
1470:
1467:
1465:
1462:
1460:
1457:
1455:
1454:Verifiability
1452:
1451:
1449:
1447:
1437:
1434:
1429:Content
1427:
1419:
1418:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1407:
1406:
1403:
1395:
1387:
1382:
1380:
1375:
1373:
1368:
1367:
1364:
1358:
1355:
1353:
1350:
1348:
1345:
1342:
1339:
1336:
1332:
1329:
1326:
1323:
1321:
1318:
1317:
1313:
1311:
1309:
1305:
1300:
1293:
1290:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1274:
1273:
1269:
1266:
1265:
1261:
1258:
1257:
1253:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1244:
1237:to handle COI
1236:
1232:
1230:
1228:
1223:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1207:
1203:
1195:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1170:verifiability
1167:
1163:
1158:
1156:
1151:
1147:
1142:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1127:
1125:
1121:
1114:
1107:
1102:
1099:
1091:
1089:
1087:
1079:
1077:
1075:
1070:
1061:
1059:
1055:
1053:
1049:
1042:
1034:
1032:
1030:
1026:
1018:
1015:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1005:
997:
995:
993:
987:
985:
981:
976:
969:
967:
965:
959:
957:
951:
948:
946:
942:
937:
934:
930:
926:
922:
917:
915:
911:
900:
898:
895:
890:
888:
884:
880:
875:
873:
869:
865:
861:
856:
854:
850:
845:
843:
839:
835:
831:
827:
823:
812:
807:
805:
803:
798:
792:
790:
789:tendentiously
784:
782:
778:
774:
770:
762:Best practice
761:
759:
757:
751:
747:
745:
741:
737:
733:
724:
719:
715:
712:
709:
706:
703:
699:
698:
697:
690:
688:
686:
681:
677:
672:
668:
666:
662:
658:
653:
645:
641:
638:
635:
631:
628:
625:
621:
617:
614:
613:
612:
608:
606:
605:verifiability
602:
598:
593:
582:
577:
575:
570:
568:
563:
562:
560:
559:
543:
542:
539:
535:
530:
527:
525:
522:
521:
520:
519:
516:
512:
507:
504:
502:
499:
495:
492:
491:
490:
487:
485:
482:
478:
475:
474:
473:
472:Project pages
470:
469:
468:
467:
464:
460:
455:
452:
450:
447:
445:
442:
441:
440:
439:
436:
432:
425:
422:
420:
417:
415:
412:
411:
410:
407:
406:
405:
404:
401:
397:
388:
385:
383:
380:
378:
375:
374:
373:
372:
369:
365:
360:
357:
355:
352:
350:
347:
345:
342:
341:
340:
339:
336:
335:
332:
328:
323:
320:
318:
315:
313:
310:
308:
305:
303:
300:
298:
293:
291:
288:
284:
281:
280:
279:
276:
274:
271:
269:
266:
265:
264:
263:
260:
256:
247:
244:
242:
239:
238:
237:
236:
233:
229:
224:
221:
219:
216:
214:
211:
209:
206:
204:
201:
199:
194:
192:
189:
187:
184:
182:
179:
177:
174:
172:
169:
168:
167:
166:
163:
162:
159:
155:
150:
149:Policies list
147:
145:
142:
141:
140:
139:
136:
132:
127:
117:
114:
107:
106:
94:
90:
87:
83:
82:
79:
74:
70:
66:
62:
56:
54:
49:
42:
41:
36:
32:
28:
19:
2236:
2227:
2219:
2212:
2204:
2197:
2161:Terms of Use
2146:
2096:WikiProjects
2076:
2013:Lead section
1933:Article size
1914:
1890:
1837:
1767:
1677:
1653:Sockpuppetry
1643:Edit warring
1593:
1503:
1439:
1415:
1410:Five pillars
1408:
1331:Template:COI
1307:
1303:
1301:
1298:
1291:
1275:
1267:
1259:
1251:
1246:
1234:
1224:
1216:discouraging
1211:
1210:
1199:
1190:
1186:
1159:
1143:
1128:
1119:
1116:}}
1110:{{
1103:
1097:
1095:
1083:
1073:
1068:
1065:
1056:
1044:
1025:linkspamming
1022:
1007:
988:
973:
964:undue weight
960:
952:
949:
938:
918:
914:WP:Oversight
907:
893:
891:
876:
872:edit warring
864:edit summary
857:
846:
819:
793:
785:
781:five pillars
769:neutral tone
765:
752:
748:
744:sockpuppetry
736:edit warring
734:, including
728:
725:Consequences
718:linkspamming
694:
673:
669:
649:
639:
629:
615:
609:
591:
590:
477:WikiProjects
344:Article size
115:
50:
1804:Attack page
1792:Biographies
1039:Main page:
1002:Main page:
449:Speedy keep
232:Discussions
93:WP:CONFLICT
27:WP:CONFLICT
2108:User boxes
2103:User pages
1742:Signatures
1618:Harassment
1550:Plagiarism
1518:Notability
1268:Act Three:
1241:See also:
828:, such as
732:disruption
597:notability
529:Notability
494:User boxes
489:User pages
246:Signatures
213:User pages
158:Behavioral
61:exceptions
2115:Shortcuts
1809:Oversight
1712:Etiquette
1623:Vandalism
1613:Consensus
1489:Image use
1479:Copyright
1292:Act Five:
1276:Act Four:
1162:namespace
933:talk page
925:reference
879:user page
860:vandalism
652:talk page
501:Shortcuts
484:Templates
203:Etiquette
78:Shortcuts
65:consensus
2120:Subpages
1986:Contents
1955:Hatnotes
1862:Blocking
1608:Civility
1538:Medicine
1335:deletion
1314:See also
1282:and the
1260:Act Two:
1252:Act One:
1196:Be civil
842:webpages
655:—
622:and the
506:Subpages
435:Deletion
414:contents
283:medicine
2290:people.
2018:Linking
1945:Be bold
1857:Banning
1243:WP:DOLT
1139:WP:COIN
1029:blocked
887:webhost
885:a free
773:sources
702:notable
634:blocked
349:Be bold
331:Editing
259:Content
2274:people
2136:
2008:Layout
2003:Images
1396:
1284:office
1113:uw-coi
894:Do not
838:people
663:, and
538:Search
424:tables
86:WP:COI
2251:Notes
2023:Lists
1974:Style
1069:minor
515:Other
419:lists
400:Style
16:<
1308:fair
1295:day.
1280:otrs
1233:How
1172:and
840:and
791:.
738:and
603:and
2138:(?)
2134:WMF
2068:(?)
1882:(?)
1829:(?)
1759:(?)
1585:(?)
1431:(?)
1398:(?)
1235:not
1098:not
676:out
607:.
33:or
2226::
2211::
1310:.
1126:.
1031:.
994:.
889:.
874:.
836:,
832:,
783:.
720:).
659:,
599:,
2222:G
2207:P
2150:P
2080:G
1918:G
1894:P
1841:P
1771:P
1681:G
1597:P
1507:G
1485:)
1481:(
1443:P
1385:e
1378:t
1371:v
1337:.
1286:.
704:.
626:.
580:e
573:t
566:v
128:.
71:.
55:.
37:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.