Knowledge

:Relevance emerges - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

58: 114: 165:
Sometimes an article's content evolves beyond its original subject. If any content is relevant to other, existing, articles, the content should be moved into those articles. Alternately, a new article can be created to hold the merged content. If the article's subject expands to a broader scope, the
320:
Making claims of relevance by using similar concepts like "it is important" does not establish relevance. Claiming an indirect connection is usually not sufficient either. "Relevance" should also not be confused with "notability"; topics and facts within an article are not required to meet the
145:
In Knowledge, rules constrain the social environment in which editors participate so that editors remain free to determine what is relevant. There are no rules for determining what is relevant, however the below, by their obviousness, exist as guiding principles (virtual rules) for discerning
132:
is simply whether a fact is in the right article, based on whether it pertains to the article's subject. Usually this is obvious. When not obvious, relevance is decided by the editors of the article, based on what is considered likely to be useful to readers. The give and take between editors
566: 376: 628: 551: 235: 422: 571: 546: 536: 334: 315: 249:, and there is little limit to the amount of information it can hold. However, adding as much information as possible is not necessarily an improvement. 633: 602: 339:
Normally, material must be directly about the subject of the article. However, two types of indirectly-related material are often acceptable:
390: 73:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
215: 134: 74: 178:
Ultimately, the content of articles in Knowledge becomes more relevant through the give and take of editing articles. The basics:
197:
Even if material is specific to an article's subject, its relevance must still be demonstrated when challenged by another editor.
259:
Articles on very general subjects should concentrate on information that is strongly connected to the general subject. Example:
443: 297:, and so does not belong in the article - though it may belong in another article. For example, the parody of Richard Nixon in 227: 200:
The best way to establish relevance of material is to edit the article in ways that make its connection to the subject clearer.
38: 521: 260: 597: 408: 415: 576: 561: 556: 386: 366: 623: 581: 453: 381: 361: 239: 191: 34: 158:
of the article to be relevant. In special cases, an indirect connection to the subject is also acceptable—see
254: 526: 482: 371: 294: 137:
maintains the health of that social engine but does not itself act as an engine for discerning relevance.
42: 37:. For information on what articles are appropriate (relevant) for Knowledge, see the official policy: 509: 448: 322: 30: 278:
Articles on very specific subjects should provide greater detail on the specific instance. Example:
263:
devotes a section to Removal from office, but only one or two sentences each to the impeachments of
504: 395: 187: 78: 476: 356: 88: 246: 541: 458: 287: 470: 298: 66: 515: 499: 17: 464: 264: 194:
can also be useful, but are not a substitute for talk page discussion during a dispute.
167: 617: 302: 283: 279: 272: 211: 206:
Move content to the appropriate article if it is not relevant to the current article.
81:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. 268: 293:
Information that is only tenuously connected to the subject of the article may be
29:
For guidelines regarding the relevance of articles or subjects as a whole, see
203:
Always place the reason for removal of information in the edit summary.
400: 210:
The above rules exist at other policy and guideline pages, including:
343:
Facts needed to establish context for more-directly related material.
33:. For guidance on the relevance of links to outside websites, see 122:
Knowledge, by its nature, is an engine for discerning relevance.
404: 108: 52: 41:. More specific guidelines for inclusion may be provided by a 377:
Knowledge:Only make links that are relevant to the context
346:
Mentions of later works that have influenced the subject.
133:
functions as a social-engine for discerning relevance.
96: 590: 492: 436: 567:How to apply WP:NOR's "Directly related" principle 629:Knowledge essays about building the encyclopedia 150:Content must be about the subject of the article 416: 45:whose scope includes the article in question. 8: 467:(verifiability does not guarantee inclusion) 335:Knowledge:Indirect relevance is sometimes OK 316:Knowledge:What claims of relevance are false 603:Category:Knowledge essays about notability 552:Notability is not relevance or reliability 423: 409: 401: 236:Knowledge:"In popular culture" articles 154:In most cases, material must simply be 159: 247:Knowledge is not a paper encyclopedia 7: 301:is not mentioned in the article on 572:Meaningful examples in pop culture 547:Indirect relevance is sometimes OK 537:What claims of relevance are false 391:Knowledge:There is no common sense 79:thoroughly vetted by the community 75:Knowledge's policies or guidelines 25: 634:Knowledge essays about neutrality 222:Minor details must be appropriate 166:article can be renamed (via the 112: 56: 290:goes into greater detail still. 228:Knowledge:Avoid trivia sections 39:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not 261:President of the United States 253:Articles should be written in 1: 598:Template:Handling miscellanea 170:) to reflect the new scope. 282:devotes a large section to 650: 387:Knowledge:Use common sense 367:Knowledge:Lamest edit wars 332: 313: 225: 86: 50:Essay on editing Knowledge 18:User:Len Raymond/Relevance 485:(list selection criteria) 382:Knowledge:Patent nonsense 362:Knowledge:Handling trivia 271:, and the resignation of 240:Knowledge:Handling trivia 120:This page in a nutshell: 35:Knowledge:External links 437:Policies and guidelines 216:policies and guidelines 186:—through discussion at 372:Knowledge:Out of scope 444:What Knowledge is not 333:Further information: 323:notability guidelines 314:Further information: 310:What relevance is not 226:Further information: 77:, as it has not been 522:Relevance of content 182:Determine relevance— 31:Knowledge:Notability 431:Relevance and scope 396:Knowledge:Relevance 473:(levels of detail) 357:Knowledge:Coatrack 141:Guiding principles 611: 610: 562:Coatrack articles 532:Relevance emerges 512:(content removal) 329:Common exceptions 288:Watergate scandal 174:Relevance emerges 160:common exceptions 156:about the subject 126: 125: 107: 106: 16:(Redirected from 641: 624:Knowledge essays 425: 418: 411: 402: 299:The X-Presidents 234:Related essays: 184:when not obvious 135:Knowledge policy 116: 115: 109: 99: 60: 59: 53: 21: 649: 648: 644: 643: 642: 640: 639: 638: 614: 613: 612: 607: 586: 582:Content removal 518:(stay on topic) 488: 483:WP:LISTCRITERIA 479:(content split) 454:Image relevance 432: 429: 353: 337: 331: 318: 312: 230: 224: 176: 152: 143: 113: 103: 102: 95: 91: 83: 82: 57: 51: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 647: 645: 637: 636: 631: 626: 616: 615: 609: 608: 606: 605: 600: 594: 592: 588: 587: 585: 584: 579: 574: 569: 564: 559: 554: 549: 544: 539: 534: 529: 524: 519: 513: 507: 502: 496: 494: 490: 489: 487: 486: 480: 474: 468: 462: 456: 451: 446: 440: 438: 434: 433: 430: 428: 427: 420: 413: 405: 399: 398: 393: 384: 379: 374: 369: 364: 359: 352: 349: 348: 347: 344: 330: 327: 311: 308: 307: 306: 291: 276: 265:Andrew Johnson 257: 244: 243: 223: 220: 212:Knowledge help 208: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192:edit summaries 190:. Comments in 175: 172: 151: 148: 142: 139: 128:On Knowledge, 124: 123: 117: 105: 104: 101: 100: 92: 87: 84: 72: 71: 63: 61: 49: 48: 47: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 646: 635: 632: 630: 627: 625: 622: 621: 619: 604: 601: 599: 596: 595: 593: 589: 583: 580: 578: 575: 573: 570: 568: 565: 563: 560: 558: 555: 553: 550: 548: 545: 543: 540: 538: 535: 533: 530: 528: 525: 523: 520: 517: 514: 511: 510:WP:IRRELEVANT 508: 506: 503: 501: 498: 497: 495: 491: 484: 481: 478: 475: 472: 469: 466: 463: 460: 457: 455: 452: 450: 447: 445: 442: 441: 439: 435: 426: 421: 419: 414: 412: 407: 406: 403: 397: 394: 392: 388: 385: 383: 380: 378: 375: 373: 370: 368: 365: 363: 360: 358: 355: 354: 350: 345: 342: 341: 340: 336: 328: 326: 324: 321:standards of 317: 309: 304: 303:Richard Nixon 300: 296: 292: 289: 285: 281: 280:Richard Nixon 277: 274: 273:Richard Nixon 270: 266: 262: 258: 256: 255:summary style 252: 251: 250: 248: 242: 241: 237: 232: 231: 229: 221: 219: 217: 213: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 189: 185: 181: 180: 179: 173: 171: 169: 163: 161: 157: 149: 147: 140: 138: 136: 131: 121: 118: 111: 110: 98: 94: 93: 90: 85: 80: 76: 70: 68: 62: 55: 54: 46: 44: 40: 36: 32: 27: 26: 19: 531: 527:Out of scope 338: 319: 295:out of scope 269:Bill Clinton 245: 233: 209: 183: 177: 164: 155: 153: 144: 129: 127: 119: 64: 28: 477:WP:CONSPLIT 146:relevance. 65:This is an 43:WikiProject 618:Categories 459:WP:CONTEXT 449:Notability 188:talk pages 577:Inclusion 557:Exclusion 505:Relevance 471:WP:DETAIL 461:(linking) 284:Watergate 162:, below. 130:relevance 591:See also 516:WP:TOPIC 351:See also 168:move tab 89:Shortcut 542:Germane 465:WP:ONUS 97:WP:RELE 493:Essays 500:Scope 389:and 67:essay 267:and 238:and 214:and 620:: 325:. 286:; 218:. 424:e 417:t 410:v 305:. 275:. 69:. 20:)

Index

User:Len Raymond/Relevance
Knowledge:Notability
Knowledge:External links
Knowledge:What Knowledge is not
WikiProject
essay
Knowledge's policies or guidelines
thoroughly vetted by the community
Shortcut
WP:RELE
Knowledge policy
common exceptions
move tab
talk pages
edit summaries
Knowledge help
policies and guidelines
Knowledge:Avoid trivia sections
Knowledge:"In popular culture" articles
Knowledge:Handling trivia
Knowledge is not a paper encyclopedia
summary style
President of the United States
Andrew Johnson
Bill Clinton
Richard Nixon
Richard Nixon
Watergate
Watergate scandal
out of scope

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑