31:
153:
should usually not have articles, instead discussing the person in context of the larger event or related topic. Even if the subject is notable or known for multiple events, an article about them which is very unbalanced (for example draws disproportionately on one matter in summarizing their life)
105:
There is no single guideline that determines when a topic merits a stand-alone article. Instead, there are several intersecting policies and guidelines that editors use to evaluate if a topic should get an article, or, if an article has already been created, whether it should be merged, redirected,
69:
A key element of this approach is determining when a topic merits a stand-alone article. This process is a subjective measurement based on both objective evidence and consensus decision. This guideline aids this by identifying all the applicable policies and guidelines that should be considered in
172:
must be met. An article on a topic that briefly discusses the notability but then proceeds to introduce much original research will likely be trimmed without the sections on original research. An article that focuses on only one side of a notable heated issue will either be removed or edited to
66:, and can include other forms of reference material, including that of gazetteers and almanacs. However, at the same time, Knowledge (XXG) aims to avoid the inclusion of indiscriminate information, and provide information that is verifiable and free of bias and original research.
180:
is encouraged to break large topics into manageable sub-pages. However, caution is given for breaking topics into too fine a structure; short, stubby articles spun out from a larger one with no likelihood to grow are discouraged and likely to be merged back into the larger
134:. The menu from a restaurant may be notable, but listing out the full menu with prices, calorie counts, and other minutia is not appropriate for an article. In many cases, the content of such articles can be massaged to avoid conflicting with
118:
of the topic. Because of the subjective nature of considering a topic to be notable, Knowledge (XXG) relies on the objective demonstration of notability through sources independent from the topic. This may either be through the
70:
determining whether a topic merits a stand-alone articles. Topics that fail any one of these, but are otherwise appropriate for inclusion in
Knowledge (XXG) can be included in broad topics, using
193:
to allow these to still be searchable terms for readers. Redirects also allow potential expansion of the topic in the future should the topic later be shown to merit a stand-alone article.
185:
A topic meeting all these conditions, where applicable, can merit a stand-alone article. Topics that fail one or more of these can be included in a notable parent topic article, using
173:
include all viewpoints on the issue. If such editing leaves little else to discuss about the topic, the article will likely be merged to a broader topic.
154:
or does not fairly and neutrally reflect the highest quality of sources will have these flaws corrected even if it means deleting the article to do so.
146:
106:
or deleted via consensus. The following guidelines and policies reflect, roughly in the order which with editors should consider stand-alone articles.
46:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
62:
Knowledge (XXG) strives to be a comprehensive summary of human knowledge, and due to its electronic nature, is not bound by the limits of
47:
161:
third-party sources. If there are no third-party sources about a topic, Knowledge (XXG) should not have a stand-alone article for it.
82:
51:
186:
71:
205:
39:
127:. Topics that fail to show notability can be included in broader articles on more notable topics.
150:
63:
169:
142:
135:
131:
124:
120:
94:
86:
190:
177:
165:
158:
115:
199:
138:, but if it is impossible to do this, a stand alone article is likely inappropriate.
130:
The content of an article must avoid the types of articles that we disallow through
54:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
85:, navigational lists, or redirection pages. There is also more specific advice for
17:
97:
are still applicable to content within these other namespaces.
77:
Note that these requirements for stand-alone articles apply to
145:
must be handled appropriately, per the
Wikimedia Foundation's
25:
114:
requirement for a stand-along article is demonstration of
101:
Determining the merit of a topic for a stand-alone article
74:to allow such terms to be searched for by users.
8:
93:to other namespaces, though policies like
81:articles in the Main namespace excluding
48:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
151:living persons known for only one event
7:
52:thoroughly vetted by the community
24:
29:
1:
125:subject notability guidelines
123:, or through field-specific
121:general notability guideline
112:necessary but not sufficient
132:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
222:
141:Articles dealing with
170:neutral point of view
164:The core policies of
89:. These requirements
50:, as it has not been
157:Topics must provide
83:disambiguation pages
64:paper encyclopedias
166:original research
149:. In particular,
87:stand-alone lists
60:
59:
213:
33:
32:
26:
221:
220:
216:
215:
214:
212:
211:
210:
196:
195:
103:
56:
55:
44:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
219:
217:
209:
208:
198:
197:
183:
182:
174:
162:
155:
143:living persons
139:
128:
102:
99:
58:
57:
45:
36:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
218:
207:
204:
203:
201:
194:
192:
188:
179:
178:summary style
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
137:
133:
129:
126:
122:
117:
113:
109:
108:
107:
100:
98:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
75:
73:
67:
65:
53:
49:
43:
41:
35:
28:
27:
19:
184:
111:
104:
91:do not apply
90:
78:
76:
68:
61:
37:
206:User essays
38:This is an
159:verifiable
147:resolution
116:notability
18:User:Masem
187:redirects
72:redirects
200:Category
191:anchors
181:topic.
176:While
136:WP:NOT
95:WP:NOT
40:essay
16:<
189:and
168:and
79:all
202::
110:A
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.