459:
analysis of the elements, and can include influence and other aspects of its development, critical reception of the elements, and popularity of the element through readership/viewership ratings and marketing. Notability of an element may also be shown through secondary-source analysis of the main work of fiction, citing the importance of the element to the work. Reputable academic studies of individual elements may also demonstrate notability.
916:
of the fictional topic in question. In some cases, however, a plaudit is of sufficient stature to represent sufficient coverage in itself; it is rare that such will have been given without coverage in other secondary sources, and exceptional evidence will be required to justify any element as notable on the basis of an award alone.
35:
810:. One possible action to consider is to make use of all of the Wikimedia projects combined: to have an encyclopedia article about the work of fiction on Knowledge giving a brief outline, a chapter-by-chapter annotation on Wikibooks, the full source text on Wikisource (if the work is in the public domain), and
717:. A character in a TV show that only appeared on-screen for a few seconds and is never referred to otherwise is probably non-notable; however, by using the proposed deletion process, someone may be able to provide the required evidence of notability. If you are unsure if this is the correct step, then do
475:. Evidence of notability should explain what is special about the topic, such as awards, rankings, sales figures or studies and analyses specifically relating to the element in question. Notability, in accordance with this guidance, is best demonstrated through citations to reliable secondary sources.
620:
A single movie, book, video game, or other work of fiction has most likely not generated substantial coverage in sources which
Knowledge can summarize. Therefore, the article will be able to summarize those sources in one article. On the other hand, a series of books, television shows, or video games
530:
If consensus on a fictional element is that it is of unproven notability, editors should seek to retain the information where it can improve the encyclopedia. Such coverage may be placed as part of the main article on the work of fiction, or if better suited, an article on another, notable fictional
915:
It is not generally a sufficient indicator of notability for an award to be given for a fictional topic, or for a fictional work to have high figures according to primary sources; however, these are often discussed in secondary coverage which, if significant, may be used to establish the notability
565:
Where none of the above steps can resolve the length problem without damaging encyclopedic coverage of the work, groupings of individually non-notable elements can merit their own supporting articles; this should be considered only for highly notable works, and the information within the supporting
585:
Subject-specific guidelines may limit these cases, or give other cases when such articles are considered appropriate. Articles that fail to meet these requirements can have their inclusion challenged through a deletion debate and are often deleted through editorial consensus. Articles that fail to
458:
Elements of a work of fiction, including individual stories, episodes, characters, settings, and other topics, are presumed to be notable if there is significant coverage of the element(s) in reliable secondary sources. For fictional elements, this will typically include the real-world context and
734:
tag on the article page, though it is recommended to discuss your concerns with the editors as well in this case. If many such articles within the same fictional universe exist in a similar state, attempt to find a project or task force page for that fictional work and let the editors there know
628:
At times, better depth of coverage may be accomplished by combining notable and non-notable elements into a single topic, such as a character cast or a single season of a television show, instead of individual elements. WikiProjects that deal with fiction have guidelines describing what depth of
581:
If the resulting list would be too large without exceeding the necessary depth of coverage, elements may be grouped into smaller lists. To avoid undue weight on a subtopic, the smaller lists should correspond to either highly notable fictional subtopics or divisions of the work, or a real-world
345:
Whatever you do, endeavour to preserve information. Instead of deleting: try to rephrase; correct the inaccuracy while keeping the content; move text within an article or to another article (existing or new); add more of what you think is important to make an article more balanced; or request a
312:
Knowledge articles on published works (such as fictional stories) should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's development and historical significance, not solely a detailed summary of that work's plot. This applies to both stand-alone works and series. A
478:
Notability may be shown for an individual element or for a certain grouping of elements, commonly characters or episodes. When notability can be shown, the element or grouping of elements merits a separate article. This article should be summarized in the parent article, and
560:
Remove material that may be of trivial or of only highly detailed interest to the general reader. Characters that appear only once in a work and have minimal influence on the work need not be listed, though again, they can be covered in a off-site wiki and linked
582:
division. Lists of elements corresponding to a less-notable topic could still appear as sections in an article on that topic. For divisions by fictional characteristics, consider the use of categories to categorise redirects to individual list elements.
662:
template on the article itself. Articles on fictional topics that lack demonstrated notability should be improved either by adding demonstrated notability, or by other editing actions such as trimming, merging, or moving content to another Wiki.
1009:
Regardless of how the split is broken up, the list article title should clearly indicate the work of fiction as part of the title; 'List of Jedi characters' would not be an appropriate title, but 'List of Jedi characters from Star Wars' would
999:
Highly notable works are taken as those that substantially exceed the minimum standards for notability, having large coverage in secondary sources. This would typically include those that have been the subject of extensive academic
51:. Non-notable elements should preferably be concisely covered within articles on the main work or on notable elements. Coverage of fictional elements should focus on the demonstrated notability for the topic, with an appropriate
1033:
has received, with many falling into a grey area left to editorial consensus. Where disputes cannot be resolved, please list them at various venues to encourage wider participation and the building of consensus.
833:; editors should check with related Wikiprojects to determine if a specific wiki has been selected for transwiking materials. Any transwikied material should be edited to meet the guidelines of specific wikis.
449:
for toys, traditional games, and video games. A work of fiction is presumed to be notable if it meets the general notability guideline, the guidelines presented here, or the guidelines specific to its medium.
760:
where the merits of the article can be debated. However, this should be considered carefully for an article that otherwise does not violate any further
Knowledge policies or guidelines such as those regarding
462:
Data such as actors, cast and crew, publication and airing dates, appearances in a larger body of works, and production codes, while useful and sometimes necessary data for articles on fictional elements, are
629:
coverage should be provided for plot information relative to the length of the original work. The complexity of the work should also be taken into a consideration; uses of certain creative elements (such as
557:
Transwiki excess material to a GFDL-compatible wiki. It is still appropriate to leave some mention of non-notable elements within the
Knowledge article, while linking to the other wiki for more details.
265:
such as characters, items and places within a work of fiction. For more specific notability guidelines on works of fiction presented in specific forms of media, see the following guidelines:
778:
621:
could contain elements which are better covered in a separate article or articles, helping to provide suitable background and supplementary information for each work within the series. See
906:, selected by a respected body on the basis of clear criteria; fan polls will not generally indicate notability, although coverage of the poll result in media or academic sources may do so.
756:
If the above options have been considered and determined to not be possible or if you feel that any action taken has not remedied the situation, it may be appropriate to nominate the
753:
If an existing GFDL-compatible wiki for the fictional topic exists, suggest transwiki'ing the information. Again, articles that are moved should be replaced with redirection pages.
652:
Editors may request evidence of the notability of any article, including those on fictional elements, either through in discussion on the article talk page or by the addition of a
467:
sufficient for notability as these are trivial data that can be learned for any other work in the same medium by reviewing the original work or through sites and resources such as
434:. Articles on of works of fiction should strive to information on include critical reception, viewings or sales figures, development and other information from reliable sources.
160:
863:
206:
738:
If the article can be grouped with an existing article or other articles on the same type of fictional elements, then it may be appropriate to discuss a potential
724:
Inform the editors of the article on the article's talk page of your concern about the lack of notability. This can also be done by tagging the article with the
211:
878:
554:, but in general, non-notable fictional elements should only be given sufficient information for the reader to understand its relationship with the entire work.
903:
873:
237:
606:. The size of a plot summary is often determined by building consensus for each article on a case by case basis. Editors should compare approaches taken on
510:
However, even where an element or group of elements is notable, it may be more appropriate to include the information in an article on the work itself if:
117:
141:
750:
to help track such redirects. You can boldly merge articles, but consensus will often be required before major changes are accepted by the community.
701:
First and foremost, if you can provide reliably sourced, verifiable information on real-world facts that establish the notability of the topic, be
401:. However, notability for individual topics on fiction should be judged on a case-by-case basis while following Knowledge's core policies of
1023:
for how much coverage qualifies as "substantial". We cannot rule on every instance, and there is a vast difference between the coverage the
288:
746:
in their place to the appropriate page, and link the old article or articles in your edit summary to comply with the GFDL. Consider using
550:
Trim away material to reduce the size of the article. The approach to covering non-notable fictional elements is more fully described in
807:
540:
799:
570:
for the main article's topic. Under current practice, these supporting articles are generally one of the following two types of list:
883:
858:
784:"urged to work collaboratively and constructively with the broader community and the editors committed to working on the articles"
984:
230:
110:
798:, Knowledge's sibling project, contains instructional and educational texts. These include annotated works of fiction (on the
305:
153:
426:
Articles on a work of fiction (a book, movie, television series, video game, or other medium) should demonstrate real-world
705:
and include it in the article. Here are additional suggestions to improve articles that lack demonstration of notability:
1029:
868:
815:
172:
167:
129:
77:
956:
275:
269:
148:
134:
124:
847:
747:
499:
templates should be used to direct users to where they may find more information. Further details can be found in the
223:
201:
598:
Articles on fiction should be structured around evaluations and critiques of the work or topic, with an appropriate
972:
396:
374:
326:
281:
179:
618:
Depth of coverage within an article should be guided by the amount of real-world information which can be sourced.
357:
196:
709:
If you believe the article will never have a chance of demonstrating notability or cannot be merged elsewhere,
338:
843:
365:
330:
811:
532:
960:
261:
including individual episodes of serialized works such as television or comic book series, as well as
943:
361:
318:
254:
100:
93:
86:
1020:
728:
656:
21:
853:
743:
742:. This may require that information be trimmed from the article. If articles are merged, leave
640:
If there is an imbalance of fictional information in an article, consider trimming the text or
493:
1035:
695:
52:
902:
An example of a plaudit given for fictional elements that speaks directly to notability is
980:
739:
691:
599:
442:
818:, so it is not an appropriate place to transwiki large quantities of fictional material.
292:
proposed guideline for toys and games (including both role-playing games and video games)
842:
For examples of high quality fiction articles, see the articles that have been rated as
938:
930:
830:
714:
702:
518:
410:
313:
concise plot summary is appropriate as part of the larger coverage of a fictional work.
56:
17:
822:
682:. Editors should review specific guidelines or approaches outlined in the appropriate
368:(attempt to correct the misinformation or discuss the problems first before deletion).
757:
675:
671:
637:) may require more detail to clearly explain the concepts in an encyclopedic manner.
603:
587:
551:
514:
The resulting article would be very short, with little or no likelihood of expansion.
504:
500:
483:
446:
386:
describes the work's fictional elements, such as the setting, characters, and story.
378:
may cover such things as design, development, reception and cultural impact. This is
350:
68:
43:
Articles on a work of fiction or fictional element(s) should demonstrate real-world
1024:
934:
762:
687:
679:
611:
607:
438:
431:
406:
389:
Based on this reasoning and the above excerpts, fictional concepts can be presumed
48:
976:
773:
Editors are cautioned against performing the above actions on numerous articles
766:
683:
630:
427:
402:
44:
803:
694:. Other concerns about dealing with fictional notability can be raised at the
325:
A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in
795:
634:
926:
472:
713:
that its deletion is unlikely to be contested, place the article up for
806:, similarly, holds original public domain and GFDL source texts. See
590:
can also be challenged and deleted or improved to meet our style.
821:
Fictional material unsuited or too detailed for
Knowledge can be
356:
tag. Exceptions include: duplication or redundancy; irrelevancy;
574:
Lists of characters in a highly-notable work or series of works.
468:
641:
29:
826:
67:
For information about writing articles on fiction, refer to
814:
joining them all together into a whole. However, Wikibooks
517:
The resulting article would have, by necessity, excessive
382:
because it describes the real-world aspects of the work.
76:
For specific examples where you may be able to help, see
884:
WikiProject Soap Operas guidelines on character articles
577:
Lists of episodes or serial elements in a serial work.
531:
element. If this makes the main article too long, per
666:
Nevertheless, the lack of demonstrated notability is
437:
Certain media have additional notability guidelines:
859:
Knowledge:Writing better articles#Check your fiction
602:of real-world and plot information, as outlined at
539:Merge coverage of less-notable elements to into a
864:Knowledge:Manual of Style (writing about fiction)
879:WikiProject Novels guidelines on plot summaries
825:to a appropriate GFDL-compatible wiki, such as
614:about fiction for examples of length and tone.
874:WikiProject Films guidelines on plot summaries
231:
8:
535:, then there are several steps to consider:
526:Fictional elements as part of a larger topic
395:received significant real-world coverage in
399:sources that are independent of the subject
301:This guideline is based on three excerpts:
904:AFI's 100 Years... 100 Heroes and Villains
238:
224:
82:
791:Relocating non-notable fictional material
678:improvements are expected as part of the
648:Dealing with non-notable fictional topics
566:articles should not exceed the necessary
995:
993:
644:to an appropriate GFDL-compatible Wiki.
622:
544:
262:
987:to compare with other listed characters
895:
802:) for classroom or private study use.
604:Manual of Style (Writing about fiction)
588:Manual of Style (Writing About Fiction)
552:Manual of Style (Writing about Fiction)
519:plot detail and in-universe information
505:Manual of Style (Writing about Fiction)
188:
99:
92:
85:
69:Manual of Style (Writing about fiction)
567:
1027:books have received and the coverage
975:is provided by the "Cast" section of
289:Knowledge:Notability (toys and games)
258:
7:
306:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not#PLOT
808:Wikisource:Wikisource and Wikibooks
800:Wikibooks:annotated texts bookshelf
533:Knowledge's article size guidelines
28:
586:meet the guidelines presented in
985:Characters of Final Fantasy VIII
642:moving the fictional information
441:for books and printed material,
33:
297:Defining notability for fiction
1019:This guideline does not offer
251:Knowledge:Notability (fiction)
1:
1030:The Dark Secret of Weatherend
869:Knowledge:Television episodes
78:Knowledge:Fiction/Noticeboard
971:For example, an overview of
957:Characters of Kingdom Hearts
672:criteria for speedy deletion
276:Knowledge:Notability (films)
270:Knowledge:Notability (books)
94:General notability guideline
979:, while a brief summary of
696:Fiction-related Noticeboard
212:Why was my article deleted?
161:Organizations and companies
101:Subject-specific guidelines
1056:
779:Arbitration Committee case
282:Knowledge:Notability (web)
75:
372:For articles on fiction,
816:opposes books on fiction
781:stated that editors are
625:above for more details.
417:Demonstrating notability
339:Knowledge:Editing policy
207:Common deletion outcomes
41:This page in a nutshell:
973:Characters of CarnivĂ le
346:citation by adding the
688:Wikiproject Television
501:Summary style approach
370:
335:
315:
961:Smallville (season 1)
748:redirection templates
411:neutral point of view
343:
323:
310:
284:for web-based content
944:Hell Is Other Robots
758:article for deletion
407:no original research
362:copyright violations
319:Knowledge:Notability
118:Astronomical objects
1021:a numeric threshold
623:elements of fiction
454:Elements of fiction
380:real-world coverage
253:covers the general
173:Sports and athletes
142:Geographic features
1038:is one such venue.
854:Knowledge:Fancruft
721:perform this step.
384:Fictional coverage
263:fictional elements
763:original research
744:redirection pages
715:proposed deletion
692:WikiProject Films
594:Depth of coverage
568:depth of coverage
248:
247:
202:Guide to deletion
197:Notability essays
63:
62:
1047:
1039:
1017:
1011:
1007:
1001:
997:
988:
969:
963:
953:
947:
923:
917:
913:
907:
900:
733:
727:
661:
655:
498:
492:
488:
482:
432:reliable sources
422:Works of fiction
375:reliable sources
355:
349:
327:reliable sources
259:works of fiction
240:
233:
226:
83:
57:plot information
49:reliable sources
37:
36:
30:
1055:
1054:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1018:
1014:
1008:
1004:
998:
991:
983:is included in
981:Squall Leonhart
970:
966:
954:
950:
924:
920:
914:
910:
901:
897:
892:
839:
812:interwiki links
793:
731:
725:
680:editing process
659:
653:
650:
596:
545:described above
528:
496:
490:
486:
480:
456:
445:for films, and
424:
419:
358:patent nonsense
353:
347:
333:of the subject.
299:
244:
184:
81:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1053:
1051:
1041:
1040:
1012:
1002:
989:
964:
948:
939:Pauline Fowler
931:Jason Voorhees
918:
908:
894:
893:
891:
888:
887:
886:
881:
876:
871:
866:
861:
856:
851:
838:
835:
792:
789:
771:
770:
754:
751:
736:
735:your concerns.
722:
649:
646:
595:
592:
579:
578:
575:
563:
562:
558:
555:
548:
527:
524:
523:
522:
515:
455:
452:
423:
420:
418:
415:
298:
295:
294:
293:
285:
279:
273:
246:
245:
243:
242:
235:
228:
220:
217:
216:
215:
214:
209:
204:
199:
191:
190:
186:
185:
183:
182:
176:
175:
170:
164:
163:
157:
156:
151:
145:
144:
138:
137:
132:
127:
121:
120:
114:
113:
107:
104:
103:
97:
96:
90:
89:
74:
73:
61:
60:
38:
27:
18:User:Ned Scott
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1052:
1037:
1032:
1031:
1026:
1022:
1016:
1013:
1006:
1003:
996:
994:
990:
986:
982:
978:
974:
968:
965:
962:
958:
952:
949:
946:
945:
940:
936:
932:
928:
922:
919:
912:
909:
905:
899:
896:
889:
885:
882:
880:
877:
875:
872:
870:
867:
865:
862:
860:
857:
855:
852:
849:
845:
841:
840:
836:
834:
832:
828:
824:
819:
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
797:
790:
788:
786:
785:
780:
776:
768:
767:verifiability
764:
759:
755:
752:
749:
745:
741:
737:
730:
723:
720:
716:
712:
708:
707:
706:
704:
699:
697:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
664:
658:
647:
645:
643:
638:
636:
632:
626:
624:
619:
615:
613:
612:good articles
609:
605:
601:
593:
591:
589:
583:
576:
573:
572:
571:
569:
559:
556:
553:
549:
546:
542:
538:
537:
536:
534:
525:
520:
516:
513:
512:
511:
508:
506:
502:
495:
485:
476:
474:
470:
466:
460:
453:
451:
448:
444:
440:
435:
433:
429:
421:
416:
414:
412:
408:
404:
403:verifiability
400:
398:
393:if they have
392:
387:
385:
381:
377:
376:
369:
367:
363:
359:
352:
342:
340:
334:
332:
328:
322:
320:
314:
309:
307:
302:
296:
291:
290:
286:
283:
280:
277:
274:
271:
268:
267:
266:
264:
260:
256:
252:
241:
236:
234:
229:
227:
222:
221:
219:
218:
213:
210:
208:
205:
203:
200:
198:
195:
194:
193:
192:
187:
181:
178:
177:
174:
171:
169:
166:
165:
162:
159:
158:
155:
152:
150:
147:
146:
143:
140:
139:
136:
133:
131:
128:
126:
123:
122:
119:
116:
115:
112:
109:
108:
106:
105:
102:
98:
95:
91:
88:
84:
79:
72:
70:
65:
64:
58:
54:
50:
46:
42:
39:
32:
31:
23:
19:
1028:
1025:Harry Potter
1015:
1005:
967:
955:For example
951:
942:
935:Troy McClure
925:For example
921:
911:
898:
827:Wookieepedia
820:
794:
783:
782:
774:
772:
732:}}
726:{{
718:
710:
700:
667:
665:
660:}}
654:{{
651:
639:
627:
617:
616:
597:
584:
580:
564:
541:list article
529:
509:
497:}}
491:{{
487:}}
481:{{
477:
464:
461:
457:
436:
425:
394:
390:
388:
383:
379:
373:
371:
354:}}
348:{{
344:
336:
324:
316:
311:
303:
300:
287:
250:
249:
66:
40:
831:Gaming Wiki
823:transwikied
684:WikiProject
670:one of the
631:time travel
503:section of
331:independent
180:Web content
804:Wikisource
729:notability
686:, such as
676:good faith
657:notability
635:flashbacks
428:notability
366:inaccuracy
255:notability
87:Notability
45:notability
1036:WP:FICT/N
1000:analysis.
977:CarnivĂ le
796:Wikibooks
329:that are
278:for films
272:for books
111:Academics
927:Superman
848:Featured
837:See also
775:en masse
608:featured
494:see also
473:TV Guide
443:WP:MOVIE
397:reliable
189:See also
20: |
829:or the
600:balance
391:notable
154:Numbers
53:balance
674:, and
447:WP:TOY
168:People
130:Events
890:Notes
777:; an
740:merge
439:WP:BK
430:from
364:; or
337:From
317:From
304:From
149:Music
135:Films
125:Books
47:from
16:<
941:and
846:and
844:Good
703:bold
610:and
484:main
469:IMDB
409:and
351:fact
22:FICT
1010:be.
959:or
765:or
719:not
711:and
690:or
668:not
633:or
561:to.
543:as
489:or
471:or
465:not
257:of
55:of
992:^
937:,
933:,
929:,
787:.
698:.
507:.
413:.
405:,
360:;
341::
321::
308::
850:.
769:.
547:.
521:.
239:e
232:t
225:v
80:.
71:.
59:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.