221:
197:
115:
Suppose, hypothetically, you’re trying to write the wikitext that when rendered by MediaWiki will give an example of the wikitext needed to insert a template. Let’s call the template ‘reflist’, say. The wikitext that you should write to show the user
141:
tags. This brings us to the natural meta-question: what wikitext do you have to write so that when WikiMedia renders it you get the literal phrase ‘<code>’? i.e. What wikitext did I have to put on my page to tell you to use
79:
internally uses the modern element, and allows for easier formatting. The madness—and here’s where is gets confusing—is that
36:
16:
This is the (currently) boring
Knowledge (XXG) page for long-time hardly-contributor to Knowledge (XXG),
21:
248:
180:
174:
154:. Unlike in real XHTML, in wikitext there’s no need to escape the greater than sign as well.
119:
84:
73:
220:
167:
242:
94:
80:
127:
104:
63:
196:
228:
31:
20:. My very first—and epic—contribution to Knowledge (XXG) is linked to
24:. That was in 2003. I've been ahead of the curve for a long time.
41:
27:
Examples of articles on
Knowledge (XXG) I've trivially edited:
204:
137:
You might want to put the above example inside XHTML
46:
55:For citations, notes and references, the element
8:
7:
215:
191:
163:
14:
226:This user contributes using the
219:
195:
146:tags? It’s easy: you escape the
59:is the modern way. The template
1:
69:is the old way. The template
202:This user contributes using
144:<code>...</code>
139:<code>...</code>
265:
37:Cauchy-Schwartz inequality
130:|reflist}}
50:Wikitext notes to self
232:, a Linux web browser.
160:Infoboxes about me:
57:<references/>
236:
235:
212:
211:
188:
187:
158:
157:
83:is a redirect to
256:
223:
216:
199:
192:
172:This uiser haes
164:
153:
149:
145:
140:
131:
123:
109:
108:
99:
98:
85:Template:reflist
78:
77:
68:
67:
58:
47:
264:
263:
259:
258:
257:
255:
254:
253:
239:
238:
237:
213:
189:
151:
147:
143:
138:
125:
117:
102:
101:
92:
91:
71:
70:
61:
60:
56:
12:
11:
5:
262:
260:
252:
251:
241:
240:
234:
233:
224:
214:
210:
209:
200:
190:
186:
185:
170:
162:
156:
155:
134:
133:
112:
111:
52:
51:
45:
44:
39:
34:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
261:
250:
247:
246:
244:
231:
230:
225:
222:
218:
217:
207:
206:
201:
198:
194:
193:
183:
182:
177:
176:
171:
169:
166:
165:
161:
136:
135:
129:
121:
114:
113:
106:
96:
90:
86:
82:
81:Template:refs
75:
65:
54:
53:
49:
48:
43:
40:
38:
35:
33:
30:
29:
28:
25:
23:
19:
227:
203:
179:
173:
159:
126:{{
122:}}
118:{{
107:}}
103:{{
97:}}
93:{{
88:
76:}}
72:{{
66:}}
62:{{
26:
17:
15:
181:mither tung
89:Conclusion:
249:User sco-N
229:GNOME Web
100:is good,
243:Category
152:<
110:is bad.
32:Bugzilla
120:reflist
74:reflist
178:as a
124:’ is ‘
175:Scots
150:with
18:Nicol
148:<
95:refs
42:Cron
22:here
205:GNU
168:sco
132:’.
128:tlx
105:ref
64:ref
245::
87:.
208:.
184:.
116:‘
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.