1179:
on my limited reading, it seems that most of the noble class of the
Ragusan Republic spoke and wrote an Italic dialect and identified as such until the end of the 19th century. They were an Italianate island in a Slavic sea. The first language of Ragusa/Dubrovnik was Serbo-Croatian or something very similar. Some of the images in the gallery showed an Italic gravestone and Italic written communications fr/ the late 19th century. This is all anecdotal, but indicates a pattern. Direktor, for whatever reason, wants to 'Slavicize' a predominantly Italic family. For the last 95 years Dubrovnik has been Croatian/Yugoslavian. No Italians are attempting to reclaim it. So why try to reshape the past? If it turns out that all this is wrong, so be it. But I don't think Direktor acts with anything near to a spirit of disinterested inquiry on this subject. Regards,
803:
claim it was a clear personal union by explaining how certain aspect of sovereignty were continued such as: separate coronations (until mid-13th century), independent laws, issuing separate currency, special royally appointed rulers, etc. What I tried to point out but obviously failed is - the subject of dispute is not the existence of the union (it is inexplicable what kind of union it was in modern-day terms) but the form and creation of that union. Those are two different things. By enforcing one view you are subjugating the other, which is (whether you accept it or not) more mainstream in
Croatian, Hungarian and third party historiography respectively.
550:
in official, semi-official or unofficial contexts. I noted some examples as a guide in the WT:CRO discussions on that. Also some dates when
Dubrovnik arms became official in their current form and in their original form corresponding to the modern design, as well as when the Dalmatia arms were officially disused (presumably disestablishment of the Kingdom of Dalmatia). Regarding gallery, the Dalmatia arms also appear on several forms of Austria-Hungary and Kingdom of Hungary arms as an element thereof.
646:
quite poorly referenced. The "citation needed" or "fact" templates - according to the template documentation - is used when the article is generally well referenced but only few specific claims are left unreferenced. Since this particular article lacks at least a half dozen references in the sections preceding "History" and the extensive "History" section is largely unreferenced, the refimprove tag is justified. Please read relevant tag template documentation before reverting.
2004:
509:
1089:
do the difficult thing and place the KoH as the proper s1=. As I said previously - its time to come to terms with this. If the
Kingdom of Croatia article is ever to become a respected historical article and not a poster for semi-mythical nonsense, these sort of difficult things need to be done. I mean, a chequy coat of arms looked nice there, but it isn't real. 925? Not real. Coronation? As far as we know - not real, etc...
1931:
1547:
33:
1845:
1725:
1652:
1445:
1217:
reasonable doubt (to say the less) that a discussion should be made. What I see is that my contribution in the talk page has been removed by DIREKTOR because considered not useful. I hope this is not a standard approach and would like to know if analysing secondary sources instead that relying on a Google research is really disruptive attitude as DIREKTOR claims. --
39:
1984:
sanctions for the next 12 months. That is the purpose of this template. However, given your recent conduct in the topic area, you will nevertheless not escape what would be a clearly-warranted block. Accordingly, you have been blocked for one week for repeated personal attacks. Let me know if you have any questions. Regards,
557:) and all info contained in the lead and the infobox must be present in the prose (and referenced in the prose rather than in the lead/infobox). Small size of the Dalmatia arms article is no problem for a higher assessment, it is just important to list (or provide an illustration of) its present use(s) to make it complete.
1147:
When the gallery was removed, I initially reverted it, then thought better. While inserting the two images from the 'late' gallery that pertained to the contents of the article, I discovered that the image for Ivan
Gundulic had no such identification, so I removed it, as its only label was "Gondola."
917:
And regarding
Croatia being split into two or whatever, it isn't so wrong actually as during the personal union (or whatever you want to call it) borders were shifting back and fort. And especially if we take into consideration that at some point in 13th century Croatia was in fact split into Croatia
738:
It seems I never answered your question - I'm sorry, I must have missed it somehow. There's a Talk discussion there where two other people also said the article is off base. A merge is the entirely uncontroversial course of action. At the same time, this article title can hardly be considered a valid
545:
Hi! I've recently noticed WT:CRO discussion about quality assessment of the Coat of arms of
Dubrovnik / CoA of Dalmatia articles and left a few comments there. I also thought to leave you this note and point out that both of the articles are quite good regardless of their rating. Formally, no article
1178:
I believe you're acting in good faith. Check out the latest POV edit of
Direktor's that I just reverted. Just for the heck of it, I clicked on 2 of the article's external links and discovered that "Gondola" had been changed to "Gundulic." It's a small thing, but I think it indicates a pattern. Based
1088:
this. It is precisely because I'm a Croat that I've not fixed this ages ago, knowing full well it needs fixing. Its part of the reason why I'm trying to extend the article's scope up to 1527, so we can avoid the 1102 problem. That however, seems not to be widely supported, so I've decided to finally
802:
ceased to exist completely (including as a sovereign entity) when ALL sources clearly agree and state that some sort of sovereignty is continued. Even the most nationalist POV acknowledge that. In fact some of those sources which talk about the dispute even give credence to the argument of those who
645:
documentation. Furthermore, every claim in the article needs one reference - i.e. at least one reference per paragraph, possibly one per sentence to meet WP:V. The refimprove tag is placed in articles where there's simply too many inline references missing - such as in this case where the article is
549:
Also, there is a structure-related problem in both of the articles - you'd be better off with a "Description" section at the very beginning of the prose and that would cover the issue. Regarding comprehensiveness, both of the articles need some info on modern use (or lack thereof, whichever applies)
420:
Hi
Shokatz i would like to ask you something about Croats infobox.It is about that number of 1 200 000 Croats in Usa.Do u think that it would be good that we put for example 400 000 declared Croats and 1 200 000 Croatian ancestry like it is said in the link?Or something like that?So that the infobox
609:
article. Even though you have provided additional references missing from the article. Please refrain from such actions in the future because this may be viewed as disruptive editing - the tag indicates to editors that additional citations are needed. Indeed, the article has numerous claims with no
358:
I agree with all that you said about the article..The article was very old and needed to be refreshed..We can talk on talk page about which one to remove or not..in my opinion svacic,nikola zrinski and maybe vlaho bukovac or ivan vucetic(made his name in
Argentina) should be removed..I respect them
1216:
Dear Shokatz, if after analysis of secondary sources the correct name is Gundulic this is fine for me. I do not want things my way, but at least we should follow the right methodology (is a wholesale google research a good method??). I have found enough English sources unsing Gondola so I have the
903:
were retained by Croatia i.e. they talk about the dispute in how such union came to be and of what nature was the union was. So in other words (as I have repeatedly reiterated) it is not the existence of the union that is disputed, but it's nature, whereas theories go from classical personal union
274:
Hello i see you deal with Croats Infobox..I would like you to ask is this new picture that i put of Andrija Mohorovicic good or should i put the older one?And also i would like to ask you for hel for the third link i put about population of Croats abroad..Link is of google books so if u could just
1196:
You know what? This article isn't worth much trouble. I'm going to leave it alone, and reread it occasionally to reinforce priorities, and to observe the limitations of Knowledge's model (all human endeavor has limitations), and to see how aggression, organization, and intellectual dishonesty can
246:
in individual Member State." It lists these states as "parliamentary approval obtained" and NOT "ratification procedure completed." Listing them as "Ratification process completed", as you're attempting to do, is both inaccurate and contradicts the sources. I've reverted your proposed changes
221:
Too late — someone reverted you. I blocked Ivan and mass-reverted him because he was deleting text from articles without explanation, which is never a good thing. Thanks for asking for my opinion, but since I have no opinion on whether this text belongs in the article, I won't be able to offer
241:
I'm really not sure what the confusion is here. Have you read the source that you claim to be "syncing" with? It clearly contradicts what you are arguing: "Article 3. of the Accession Treaty states that Member States shall deposit instruments of ratification with the Government of the Italian
416:
Thank you..I hope it is right now :)..Can you please help me on the talk page about Croats..DIREKTOR non stop is saying that 16 is right number and that 20 is way too much...Slovenians who are smaller nation than Croats have the same number of people ininfobox and Serbs for example have 30...
1983:
While you are six days past the formal 12 month period since being "alerted" to the discretionary sanctions in effect, I cannot block you as an arbitration enforcement discretionary sanction. As such, I am reissuing your "alert" notification so that you will again be subject to discretionary
330:
Hey did you create new infobox and new article about Croats?If u did i have few suggestions...I think there are too many Croats in infobox..I f you go to Germans you will see that there is almost the same germans as croats in infobox..There are too many of them..I would suggest that Nikola
1664:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1737:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1240:
that the Government has started a bill four days ago concerning same sex-unions. But, if it is the case, please edit the article in such a way and source accordingly. The current edit does not mean anything. It just reports the intention of the Croatian Covernment to do something.
150:
I don't believe Amir071 is the same as 67.248.128.225; the pattern is similar, but not identical. The others are sockpuppets of the IP address; for one, it's clear, and I've blocked it; the other one is highly suspicious, but I'm not blocking it after a single contentious edit.
1607:. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
918:
proper and Slavonia officially and nominally under separate Ban's (Viceroys), with Slavonia being under more direct Hungarian influence and rule, while Dalmatian-Croatian part retained more autonomous status similar to one enjoyed by entire Croatia until 13th century.
1163:
Fine, as to your message. I've put the coats of arms back, as they're relevant and NOT in a gallery. I'd like it if you'd join your comrade Herr Direktor in determining if I'm a sock puppet (see History, House of Gundulic). It's the highest and best use of your time.
1148:
If someone can show that it IS Ivan Gundulic, please do so. And I included the images of the coats of arms, titled as they appear in the sandbox. You may not like it, but it seems to me at least as Wikipedian as any other edits on the House of Gundulic/Gondola page.
758:
Ok Shokatz. Revert me once more if you want and lets stop. It was fun, but we are both sure to get blocked if we don't try and solve this like civilized men... In fact, we'll probably get blocked anyway :), but lets try and work something out in what time we have.
359:
but we already have nikola š zrinski so nikola zrinski is not very needed...toni kukoc should maybe be on that list...But as i said there is 27 or 28 Croatians in infobox and 30 Germans in infobox...And Germany is nation of 80 mil people and Croatia of 4.3 :)
1457:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
610:
citations and the tag is justified. There are no inline tags precisely because there is the template (or general, as you put it in the edit summary) tag. Please restore the tag, or provide citations to all claims missing references. Regards.--
691:
about these obsolete racial classifications, that is purely original research by the editor who added it. I made that clear in my edit summaries but you still chose to restore it against our policies and guidelines. I've taken the issue to
861:
Someone will see, if AS commenting on the other article is any indication... Lets at least see if we can agree before we're probably blocked. I don't like the current compromise version because it indicates the country split into two...
302:
Thank you for your help..But could you do the same for the 32 link?In the first sentence about 4.5 million Croats abroad also..Because link is still google books..You changed the link in infobox but not in the sentence..Cheers :)
951:". Only in your mind, eager to discover offenses against Croatia. It indicates nothing but the successor sovereign state, just like every other s parameter in every other fc infobox. Its the Kingdom of Hungary in this case.
1062:
Consequently, we can not have two entries in the long run - since they indicate that there were two sovereign entities that controlled the relevant territory, when in historical fact it was one. And no. Borders were
898:
was first used by you so I continued to use it and tried to explain my view point within it's scope, as for the sources...every source I saw (and I listed carefully through them all) state directly that some sort of
1400:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
1888:
1765:
1692:
1485:
893:
By putting the Kingdom of Hungary as a direct successor it is obviously suggested Croatia was completely annihilated and incorporated into Hungary proper, which cannot be further from the truth. The term
1872:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1749:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1676:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1469:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
983:". As has been explained about 15 times, this is not disputed. It does not change the fact, however, that the Kingdom of Hungary is the sovereign successor state as required by the infobox parameter.
715:
You have no valid arguments, only reverted me without any explanation. However, we should discuss this problem involving more editors, where everybody could tell his/her opinion. Maybe here:
1967:
1960:
1952:
1948:
1858:
1570:
444:. You added 3 links to cite Nightingale as the national bird of Croatia. Only one even mentions Nightingale. None of them support the assertion that it is the national bird. The page
560:
Hope this is helpful, I don't mean to put down articles/editors, rather I'd like to offer advice on what would be needed for the articles to warrant B-class (or GA-class). Cheers--
1033:
The bottom line is (and I will condescend once more, on the basis of my experience on this project) that you do not understand the purpose of the relevant parameter. Its about
739:
search term, so a redirect is largely useless - you might as well nominate the article for deletion, while suggesting a prior merge of whatever little content there is. --
45:
1975:
1574:
198:
474:
1286:
949:
By putting the Kingdom of Hungary as a direct successor it is obviously suggested Croatia was completely annihilated and incorporated into Hungary proper
478:
904:(accepted by majority of Croatian, Hungarian and third party historians) to mere dependency with special rights but still separate from Hungary proper.
842:
ceased to exist completely (including as a sovereign entity) when ALL sources clearly agree and state that some sort of sovereignty is continued."
331:
Zrinski,Vlaho Bukovac and one more maybe to be removed from that list..What do you think?Why did even this article changed in the first place?:)
111:
816:
as successor states...that seems reasonable enough for me. And yes, we will probably both get blocked if someone sees what we did there...lol.
182:. They seem to have demonstrated a pattern of victimization at this point so it would be best that a completely uninvolved admin intervenes. --
1978:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
1910:
1779:
1706:
1499:
1425:
688:
I cannot understand why anyone would insist on keeping text in an article when the source in no way backs up the text. There is nothing in
546:
may be higher than C-class if a single claim is left unreferenced, but both of those lack only a few so that should not be hard to remedy.
1947:
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
2028:
1588:
770:
you think I've violated WP:V?? I mean, I've been around on this project for 7 years and 50,000 edits, and I know I did not, but still?
1625:
It may happen that an ethnic naming issue starts to resemble a 'turf-marking' issue between two editors. In that case, a comment like
716:
458:
1350:
386:
So whodouthink we should remove from that list?Because onTalk page nobody will answer...Nikola Zrinski,Vlaho Bukovac,Ivan Vucetic?
1525:. You should also verify that the form "Lawrence of Ilok" is more commone in English literature than the form "Lawrance Újlaki".
114:
using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
1515:
Please read the relevant literature published in English before moving plages. Please compare this list about the Újlaki family
1971:
1906:
1775:
1702:
1579:
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means
1566:
1495:
1421:
413:
Hey can you tell me how canisign my post so that everyone cansee that i am posting?Scrosby85 17:16, 3 July 2013 (UTC)Scrosby85
402:
375:
347:
319:
291:
1596:
1523:
2067:
2017:
1037:
states. Its supposed to point the reader to the country that succeeded as the authority here. For a Croatian example, see
1004:
813:
129:
100:
49:
1881:
1758:
1685:
1478:
90:
1412:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1893:
1770:
1697:
1490:
1417:
56:
and have been editing Knowledge for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on
1045:, but Yugoslavia in general. Subdivisions do list subdivisions as successors/predecessors, but not sovereign states.
696:
and will be interested to see your response. Hopefully it will be to remove the text. Did you even read the source?
1956:
1592:
477:
on what constitutes full parliamentary approval, so we can see what consensus is? I advice not to change the page
2012:
1604:
1297:
2063:
1600:
1580:
1354:
1042:
528:
1265:
2021:
1803:
1584:
1573:
to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is
454:
441:
206:
85:
80:
1869:
1746:
1673:
1466:
115:
1361:. He now turned to English Knowledge and shows the same attitude that already got him blocked 2 times.
1119:
Ok. To be clear, Shokatz, I'm only letting up because the current RM might make this discussion void.
1634:
1615:
1553:
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge. It does
1314:
1292:
1246:
1222:
724:
701:
651:
Finally, and aside from this topic, there's no need for condescending summary edits like you made in
390:
363:
335:
307:
279:
260:
255:. Please self-revert and discuss on the talk page if you disagree with me and all the the sources.
222:
useful input, aside from saying that you need not worry about my concerns on this specific article.
1825:
1413:
1358:
1038:
639:
599:
524:
426:
398:
371:
343:
315:
287:
248:
244:
only upon fulfillment of that conditions the Accession Treaty can be considered officially ratified
178:. In any case, you should find diffs that demonstrate an exact pattern and report whoever it is at
107:
61:
1198:
1180:
1165:
1149:
553:
Finally, please note that the lead is meant as a summary of the article, not an introduction (see
1516:
1334:
1261:
1129:
1099:
872:
846:
839:
809:
799:
780:
673:
615:
580:
565:
482:
445:
975:
isn't just a word. Sovereign authorities are listed as successors to sovereign authorities. @"..
1852:
1799:
1733:
1660:
1583:
administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the
1530:
1453:
1435:
1389:
1380:
1368:
1353:
is a puppet who came from Serbian Knowledge since he got blocked indefinitely over there. See
1202:
1184:
1169:
1153:
977:
every source I saw (and I listed carefully through them all) state directly that some sort of
508:
449:
227:
202:
171:
136:
57:
575:
Glad to hear so. I trust both articles have few gaps to fill before a B-class is warranted.--
2034:
1937:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
1900:
1865:
1742:
1669:
1462:
1409:
1393:
1880:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1757:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1684:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1477:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1408:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2003:
1630:
1611:
1310:
1242:
1218:
720:
697:
490:
275:
put sentence like that one of "4.5 million Croatians" not the google books link?Thanks:)
256:
69:
1007:
isn't really a country article, its a period article. It can't be listed as a successor
523:
For noticing the IP's page switch at RFPP. You saved us a lot of trouble. Thank you. :)
1877:
1818:
1754:
1681:
1474:
1405:
1397:
554:
422:
394:
367:
339:
311:
283:
32:
1930:
1546:
1873:
1750:
1677:
1470:
1401:
1330:
1309:
Well caught. I've a filter that stops a lot of it. Must see if it needs enhancement.
1282:
1275:
1122:
1092:
865:
773:
744:
693:
669:
665:
661:
629:
611:
576:
561:
252:
187:
179:
156:
95:
2062:(which I have reverted), the block is now indefinite with talk page access revoked.
1526:
1362:
1327:
919:
817:
223:
175:
121:
53:
1844:
1724:
1651:
1444:
972:
835:
795:
2044:
1985:
1357:. He is a puppet of another user that got banned for disruptive behavior. See
808:
Now I was ready to compromise, f.e. I would have not objected if you put both
486:
76:
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
17:
856:" continued? Does any source actually use the word you're using? Sovereign.
2027:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
740:
606:
183:
152:
2031:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
1884:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1796:
1761:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1688:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1481:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1862:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1237:
38:
1084:
Look, I'll be perfectly honest. I'm a Croat too, and I don't exactly
2071:
2051:
1992:
1914:
1830:
1807:
1783:
1710:
1638:
1619:
1534:
1503:
1429:
1374:
1338:
1318:
1299:
1269:
1250:
1226:
1206:
1188:
1173:
1157:
1137:
1107:
927:
880:
825:
788:
748:
728:
705:
677:
619:
584:
569:
532:
494:
463:
430:
406:
379:
351:
323:
295:
264:
231:
210:
191:
160:
140:
689:
684:
Restoring cited text removed because the source was misrepresented
1396:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
1943:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
1897:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
944:
Always the same sort of nationalist nonsense on this project...
1887:
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
1764:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
1691:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
1484:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
1557:
imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
421:
would look more realistic.Let me know here on your talk page.
1540:
Ethnic naming disputes are covered by discretionary sanctions
2002:
1260:
Hi, It has to be closed by an admin. Give it time. Cheers
1629:
may expose you to sanctions under the policy. Thank you,
1236:
Dear Shokatz, I have no problem to report in the article
1856:
is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
2059:
1868:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1745:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1672:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1626:
1465:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
652:
473:
dear Shokatz, could you please join the discussion at
1518:
with the list about the House of Ilok (actually about
2020:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
664:and report further baseless removal of the tag to
1388:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
1349:Hello. I would like to inform you that the user
199:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Oldhouse2012
1067:"shifting back and forth" after Gvozd and 1102.
475:Talk:Accession of Croatia to the European Union
1595:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as
1197:often carry the day in human affairs. Regards
1329:I think this is another suspicious account.--
197:G'day, reported as sock of Oldhouse2012 here
8:
1798:The thing is starting to become tiresome. --
1966:For additional information, please see the
1951:is in effect. Any administrator may impose
1287:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Shokatz
635:templates requesting inline references per
1963:, when making edits related to the topic.
1839:
766:explain to me, slowly and carefully, just
479:Accession of Croatia to the European Union
247:several times, and restored the long-term
237:Accession of Croatia to the European Union
660:I will revert the removal once again per
506:
31:
1561:Please carefully read this information:
852:Which source agrees that some sort of "
2018:personal attacks towards other editors
1955:on editors who do not strictly follow
625:There is no need to place additional
7:
2016:temporarily from editing for making
1853:2019 Arbitration Committee elections
1734:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
1661:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
1454:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
1968:guidance on discretionary sanctions
1817:Can you please send me an email? --
417:Scrosby85 17:48, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
1836:ArbCom 2019 election voter message
1718:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
1645:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
717:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Croatia
25:
1414:review the candidates' statements
1351:Special:Contributions/72.66.12.17
1929:
1843:
1723:
1650:
1545:
1443:
507:
37:
1891:and submit your choices on the
1795:Can you please close this RfC?
1768:and submit your choices on the
1695:and submit your choices on the
170:Sokac121 and IvanOS think it's
1731:Hello, Shokatz. Voting in the
1658:Hello, Shokatz. Voting in the
1451:Hello, Shokatz. Voting in the
1420:. For the Election committee,
1390:Arbitration Committee election
1381:ArbCom elections are now open!
668:per same guideline. Regards.--
485:there to get the change in...
1:
1915:00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
1870:Knowledge arbitration process
1831:15:19, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
1784:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
1747:Knowledge arbitration process
1674:Knowledge arbitration process
1504:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
1467:Knowledge arbitration process
1430:16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
1227:13:09, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
1207:09:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
1189:06:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
1174:04:45, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
1158:09:26, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
1005:Croatia in union with Hungary
814:Croatia in union with Hungary
431:23:24, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
211:05:54, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
192:19:14, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
86:The five pillars of Knowledge
36:Some cookies to welcome you!
1808:09:53, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
1711:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
1305:Europa Universalis vandalism
1138:12:49, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
1108:19:00, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
928:10:21, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
881:10:00, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
849:ceased to exist completely"?
826:09:56, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
789:09:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
749:17:55, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
729:01:15, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
706:10:50, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
161:07:38, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
101:How to write a great article
1488:and submit your choices on
1416:and submit your choices on
1339:12:09, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
678:16:11, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
620:13:42, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
448:doesn't mention it either.
2088:
1961:page-specific restrictions
1907:MediaWiki message delivery
1776:MediaWiki message delivery
1703:MediaWiki message delivery
1627:'stop acting like a child'
1496:MediaWiki message delivery
1486:the candidates' statements
1422:MediaWiki message delivery
1319:08:18, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
1281:You have been reported to
1041:: its successor isn't the
595:Hi! I noticed you removed
585:09:41, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
570:18:54, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
464:11:57, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
324:15:58, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
296:03:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
232:18:39, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
2072:12:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
2052:01:36, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
2029:guide to appealing blocks
2022:make useful contributions
1993:01:34, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
1375:17:25, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
1300:13:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
1270:06:06, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
1251:08:43, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
591:Removal of refimprove tag
533:04:06, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
517:The Barnstar of Diligence
513:
380:01:25, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
352:23:48, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
265:21:10, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
141:00:30, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
60:. You can also check out
48:, Shokatz! Thank you for
1905:to your user talk page.
1639:19:09, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
1620:15:26, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
1535:13:16, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
1043:Federal State of Croatia
981:were retained by Croatia
923:
845:Where did I claim that "
495:13:08, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
481:, as it appears you are
407:01:24, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
1972:Arbitration Committee's
1949:discretionary sanctions
1924:Alert renewal and block
1571:discretionary sanctions
1014:if you're able, please.
711:King of Croatia infobox
106:Also, when you post on
2007:
762:For starters, can you
442:List of national birds
42:
2039:Your reason here ~~~~
2006:
1866:Arbitration Committee
1850:Hello! Voting in the
1743:Arbitration Committee
1670:Arbitration Committee
1589:standards of behavior
1567:Arbitration Committee
1463:Arbitration Committee
1436:ArbCom Elections 2016
1394:Arbitration Committee
242:Republic, therefore,
146:Re: Is it just me or?
35:
1957:Knowledge's policies
1597:editing restrictions
1585:purpose of Knowledge
1212:Disruptive attitude?
46:Welcome to Knowledge
2064:Boing! said Zebedee
1398:arbitration process
1039:Banovina of Croatia
436:Croatia nightingale
62:Knowledge:Questions
2008:
1882:arbitration policy
1759:arbitration policy
1686:arbitration policy
1479:arbitration policy
1438:: Voting now open!
1410:arbitration policy
847:Kingdom of Croatia
840:Kingdom of Croatia
810:Kingdom of Hungary
800:Kingdom of Croatia
734:Re: Article merger
500:A Barnstar For You
446:Symbols of Croatia
91:How to edit a page
50:your contributions
43:
1921:
1920:
1143:Gundulic Articles
538:
537:
462:
410:
393:comment added by
383:
366:comment added by
355:
338:comment added by
327:
310:comment added by
299:
282:comment added by
172:User:Oldhouse2012
138:
134:
128:
16:(Redirected from
2079:
2049:
2042:
1990:
1933:
1904:
1847:
1840:
1828:
1822:
1727:
1654:
1549:
1447:
1296:
1136:
1135:
1132:
1125:
1106:
1105:
1102:
1095:
1012:Acknowledge this
879:
878:
875:
868:
787:
786:
783:
776:
768:how in the world
644:
638:
634:
628:
604:
598:
511:
504:
503:
452:
409:
387:
382:
360:
354:
332:
326:
304:
298:
276:
174:, actually, not
137:
133:
130:
126:
124:
74:
68:
41:
21:
2087:
2086:
2082:
2081:
2080:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2055:
2054:
2045:
2032:
2025:
2000:
1986:
1981:
1980:
1934:
1926:
1898:
1838:
1826:
1820:
1815:
1793:
1788:
1787:
1728:
1720:
1715:
1714:
1655:
1647:
1609:
1608:
1569:has authorised
1550:
1542:
1513:
1508:
1507:
1491:the voting page
1448:
1440:
1418:the voting page
1384:
1347:
1307:
1290:
1279:
1258:
1234:
1214:
1145:
1130:
1127:
1123:
1120:
1100:
1097:
1093:
1090:
873:
870:
866:
863:
834:@"You violated
781:
778:
774:
771:
756:
736:
713:
686:
642:
636:
632:
626:
602:
596:
593:
543:
502:
471:
438:
388:
361:
333:
305:
277:
272:
239:
219:
168:
148:
131:
122:
72:
66:
30:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
2085:
2083:
2075:
2074:
2026:
2010:You have been
2009:
2001:
1999:
1996:
1935:
1928:
1927:
1925:
1922:
1919:
1918:
1889:the candidates
1859:eligible users
1848:
1837:
1834:
1814:
1811:
1792:
1789:
1766:the candidates
1729:
1722:
1721:
1719:
1716:
1693:the candidates
1656:
1649:
1648:
1646:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1591:, or relevant
1551:
1544:
1543:
1541:
1538:
1512:
1509:
1449:
1442:
1441:
1439:
1433:
1387:
1383:
1378:
1346:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1323:
1306:
1303:
1278:
1273:
1257:
1254:
1233:
1230:
1213:
1210:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1144:
1141:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
993:
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
961:
960:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
886:
885:
884:
883:
859:
858:
857:
850:
829:
828:
805:
804:
755:
752:
735:
732:
712:
709:
685:
682:
681:
680:
657:
656:
648:
647:
592:
589:
588:
587:
542:
539:
536:
535:
525:Anna Frodesiak
520:
519:
514:
512:
501:
498:
470:
467:
437:
434:
271:
268:
238:
235:
218:
215:
214:
213:
167:
164:
147:
144:
112:sign your name
104:
103:
98:
93:
88:
83:
29:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2084:
2073:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2056:
2053:
2050:
2048:
2040:
2036:
2030:
2023:
2019:
2015:
2014:
2005:
1997:
1995:
1994:
1991:
1989:
1979:
1977:
1973:
1969:
1964:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1945:
1944:
1942:
1932:
1923:
1917:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1902:
1896:
1895:
1890:
1885:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1861:
1860:
1855:
1854:
1849:
1846:
1842:
1841:
1835:
1833:
1832:
1829:
1824:
1823:
1812:
1810:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1790:
1786:
1785:
1781:
1777:
1773:
1772:
1767:
1762:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1739:
1736:
1735:
1726:
1717:
1713:
1712:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1699:
1694:
1689:
1687:
1683:
1679:
1675:
1671:
1666:
1663:
1662:
1653:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1563:
1562:
1558:
1556:
1548:
1539:
1537:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1521:
1517:
1510:
1506:
1505:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1492:
1487:
1482:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1459:
1456:
1455:
1446:
1437:
1434:
1432:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1382:
1379:
1377:
1376:
1372:
1371:
1366:
1365:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1321:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1304:
1302:
1301:
1298:
1295:
1294:
1288:
1285:, please see
1284:
1277:
1274:
1272:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1262:In ictu oculi
1255:
1253:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1239:
1232:Reverted edit
1231:
1229:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1211:
1209:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1142:
1140:
1139:
1133:
1126:
1109:
1103:
1096:
1087:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1066:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1013:
1010:
1006:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
982:
978:
974:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
966:
965:
964:
963:
962:
950:
946:
945:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
929:
925:
921:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
902:
897:
892:
891:
890:
889:
888:
887:
882:
876:
869:
860:
855:
851:
848:
844:
843:
841:
837:
833:
832:
831:
830:
827:
823:
819:
815:
811:
807:
806:
801:
797:
794:You violated
793:
792:
791:
790:
784:
777:
769:
765:
760:
753:
751:
750:
746:
742:
733:
731:
730:
726:
722:
718:
710:
708:
707:
703:
699:
695:
690:
683:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
659:
658:
654:
650:
649:
641:
631:
624:
623:
622:
621:
617:
613:
608:
601:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
573:
572:
571:
567:
563:
558:
556:
551:
547:
540:
534:
530:
526:
522:
521:
518:
515:
510:
505:
499:
497:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
468:
466:
465:
460:
456:
451:
447:
443:
435:
433:
432:
428:
424:
418:
414:
411:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
384:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
356:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
328:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
300:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
269:
267:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
245:
236:
234:
233:
229:
225:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
195:
194:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
166:Re: IP Vandal
165:
163:
162:
158:
154:
145:
143:
142:
139:
135:
125:
119:
117:
113:
109:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
87:
84:
82:
79:
78:
77:
75:
71:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
34:
27:
19:
2046:
2038:
2011:
1987:
1982:
1965:
1946:
1940:
1938:
1936:
1892:
1886:
1863:
1857:
1851:
1819:
1816:
1800:3E1I5S8B9RF7
1794:
1769:
1763:
1740:
1732:
1730:
1696:
1690:
1667:
1659:
1657:
1610:
1564:
1560:
1559:
1554:
1552:
1519:
1514:
1489:
1483:
1460:
1452:
1450:
1385:
1369:
1363:
1348:
1322:
1308:
1291:
1280:
1259:
1235:
1215:
1195:
1146:
1118:
1085:
1064:
1034:
1011:
1008:
980:
976:
948:
900:
895:
853:
838:by claiming
821:
798:by claiming
767:
763:
761:
757:
737:
714:
687:
594:
559:
552:
548:
544:
541:CoA articles
516:
483:edit warring
472:
450:Chuunen Baka
439:
419:
415:
412:
389:— Preceding
385:
362:— Preceding
357:
334:— Preceding
329:
306:— Preceding
301:
278:— Preceding
273:
251:version per
249:WP:CONSENSUS
243:
240:
220:
207:send... over
203:Peacemaker67
176:User:Nado158
169:
149:
120:
105:
81:Introduction
65:
58:my talk page
44:
18:User:Shokatz
1894:voting page
1791:RfC closure
1771:voting page
1698:voting page
973:Sovereignty
896:sovereignty
854:sovereignty
201:. Regards,
110:you should
1998:April 2020
1878:topic bans
1755:topic bans
1682:topic bans
1631:EdJohnston
1612:EdJohnston
1581:uninvolved
1475:topic bans
1406:topic bans
1311:Dougweller
1243:Silvio1973
1219:Silvio1973
721:Norden1990
698:Dougweller
640:refimprove
600:refimprove
469:discussion
116:Wikipedian
108:talk pages
96:Help pages
1974:decision
1959:, or the
1953:sanctions
1874:site bans
1751:site bans
1678:site bans
1520:houses in
1471:site bans
1402:site bans
1035:sovereign
653:this edit
605:tag from
423:Scrosby85
395:Scrosby85
368:Scrosby85
340:Scrosby85
312:Scrosby85
284:Scrosby85
2037:|reason=
1970:and the
1939:It does
1593:policies
1331:ChumleeS
1124:Director
1094:Director
867:Director
775:Director
670:Tomobe03
612:Tomobe03
607:Dalmatia
577:Tomobe03
562:Tomobe03
459:contribs
403:contribs
391:unsigned
376:contribs
364:unsigned
348:contribs
336:unsigned
320:contribs
308:unsigned
292:contribs
280:unsigned
64:or type
28:Welcome!
2047:~Swarm~
2035:unblock
2013:blocked
1988:~Swarm~
1901:NoACEMM
1527:Borsoka
1522:Ilok):
1364:Detoner
1238:Croatia
1199:Tapered
1181:Tapered
1166:Tapered
1150:Tapered
920:Shokatz
818:Shokatz
555:WP:LEAD
270:Infobox
224:Nyttend
54:Marek69
52:. I am
2058:After
1605:blocks
1587:, our
1511:Moving
1392:. The
1345:Puppet
1293:Salvio
1283:WP:SPI
1276:WP:SPI
1009:state.
979:rights
901:rights
764:please
694:WP:RSN
666:WP:ANI
662:WP:DDE
253:WP:BRD
217:IvanOS
180:WP:SPI
70:helpme
1821:Silve
1813:Email
1603:, or
754:Ugggh
487:L.tak
123:Marek
2068:talk
2060:this
1976:here
1911:talk
1864:The
1827:rije
1804:talk
1780:talk
1741:The
1707:talk
1668:The
1635:talk
1616:talk
1601:bans
1575:here
1565:The
1531:talk
1500:talk
1461:The
1426:talk
1370:talk
1359:here
1355:here
1335:talk
1315:talk
1266:talk
1247:talk
1223:talk
1203:talk
1185:talk
1170:talk
1154:talk
1131:talk
1101:talk
1086:like
924:talk
874:talk
836:WP:V
822:talk
812:and
796:WP:V
782:talk
745:talk
741:Joy
725:talk
719:. --
702:talk
674:talk
630:fact
616:talk
581:talk
566:talk
529:talk
491:talk
455:talk
427:talk
399:talk
372:talk
344:talk
316:talk
288:talk
261:talk
228:talk
188:talk
184:Joy
157:talk
153:Joy
2043:.
1941:not
1555:not
1386:Hi,
1121:--
1091:--
1065:not
864:--
772:--
440:Re
257:TDL
118:!
2070:)
2041:}}
2033:{{
2024:.
1913:)
1903:}}
1899:{{
1876:,
1806:)
1782:)
1774:.
1753:,
1709:)
1701:.
1680:,
1637:)
1618:)
1599:,
1577:.
1533:)
1502:)
1494:.
1473:,
1428:)
1404:,
1373:)
1337:)
1317:)
1289:.
1268:)
1256:RM
1249:)
1241:--
1225:)
1205:)
1187:)
1172:)
1156:)
947:@"
926:)
824:)
747:)
727:)
704:)
676:)
643:}}
637:{{
633:}}
627:{{
618:)
603:}}
597:{{
583:)
568:)
531:)
493:)
457:•
429:)
405:)
401:•
378:)
374:•
350:)
346:•
322:)
318:•
294:)
290:•
263:)
230:)
209:)
190:)
159:)
151:--
132:69
73:}}
67:{{
2066:(
1909:(
1802:(
1778:(
1705:(
1633:(
1614:(
1529:(
1498:(
1424:(
1367:(
1333:(
1313:(
1264:(
1245:(
1221:(
1201:(
1183:(
1168:(
1152:(
1134:)
1128:(
1104:)
1098:(
922:(
877:)
871:(
820:(
785:)
779:(
743:(
723:(
700:(
672:(
655:.
614:(
579:(
564:(
527:(
489:(
461:)
453:(
425:(
397:(
370:(
342:(
314:(
286:(
259:(
226:(
205:(
186:(
155:(
127:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
