Knowledge

User talk:46.97.170.79

Source 📝

100: 24: 179: 368: 476: 310: 646: 281:
comments I made are all part of this discussion: my reasoning as to why the information should be included, and my responses to two particular editors who I do not believe are being impartial here, and appear to be engaging in the kind of sophistry I've seen from Jordan Peterson apologists on Youtube. My comments have nothing to do with my feelings.
272:
If that is the case, I apologize, however, in this particular case, I'm not seeing the problem. The closest the two linked edits I made come to anything "disparaging" is describing another editor's sumary of a source that's being discussed for inclusion as "nonsense". Furthermore, you say If I have
585:
Have you had a previous named account? Most IP editors are making small changes or only a few. After a point most decide to create an account. I would encourage you to do the same or if you have a prior account and a lost pass word (not uncommon) create a new account and point to the old one as
393:
Propose this "editor" be blocked from contributing to any talk pages. He's clearly an unhinged bad faith actor who tries to treat each talk page he targets like his own personal left-wing blog and edits them based on his own political biases with no regard for fairness. He's also fond of personal
606:
I didn't have a previous account. I know I have a lot of edits for an IP user, but I'm also stick to a very limited number of topics, and when those lose relevance, I just drop off the site for some time. Creating an account means I become a regular contributor and it just becomes another thing
280:
Regarding the Peterson article, my comments are part of an excessively long thread on whether a specific edit should be made to the article, namely the inclusion of a two paragraph summary of Mishra's and Brooker's analysis of Peterson's ideologies and the parallels they draw with fascism. The
276:
My comments on Ben Shapiro relate to wether or not his review of a book (the subject of the first article) is due. I removed mention of two reviews of the book, which I believe came from fringe sources and are undue. That specific comment is a response to another IP user who kept insisting on
40:
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
69: 250:] as they disparage BLP subjects (and others). If you have specific edits you think should be made or comments on specific edits please do. The talk pages are not a wp:FORUM to express your feelings about article subjects. 273:
specific edits I think should be made, or comments on specific edits, then I should do that, instead of expressing my feelings. The thing is, both instances relate to discussions of specific edits, one of which I myself made.
409: 376: 144: 136: 129: 121: 117: 61: 54: 46: 42: 116:
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
372: 607:
drawing attention away from life outside the internet. I prefer there be fewer sites I'm compelled to log in to every single day just to go through the motions.
288:
said. If I was wrong in my assumption that the behavior of an admin is a good indicator of what is and what isn't acceptable on talk pages, then just say so.
437: 566:
Thanks, this should make things a lot easier. Question. If this is an option, would it be a good idea to blank the talk pages on the old IP adresses?
187: 147:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 72:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 321:
without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Knowledge with an accurate
431: 284:
I'm not sure which are the disparaging comments I've made about BLP subjects. I do not believe I've said anything that's worse than what
500: 480: 289: 213: 405: 608: 567: 664: 543: 492: 355: 234: 401: 140: 65: 325:. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the 163: 88: 455: 318: 539: 351: 230: 513:
The foregoing is a boilerplate notice -- Actually, I did not revert your disruptive addition to the talk page -- see
707: 443: 183: 125: 50: 153: 78: 659:. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may 277:
reverting my edits and attacking my person. Incidentally, other editors have confirmed that I was in the right.
425: 293: 217: 695: 340: 330: 212:
I didn't say anything that wasn't already on wikipedia or easily deducible from information on wikipedia.
420: 202: 522: 508: 496: 397: 726: 673: 384: 721: 507:
for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
628: 591: 255: 660: 547: 504: 359: 336: 326: 322: 314: 238: 329:. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 484: 198: 191: 106:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
30:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
731: 186:
information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Knowledge about
652: 519: 645: 488: 380: 99: 23: 624: 587: 561: 267: 251: 246:
IP, your continued comments about BLP subjects is a problem. Comments such as these
178: 711: 679: 716: 656: 685: 632: 616: 595: 575: 532: 413: 388: 344: 297: 259: 221: 206: 167: 92: 700: 285: 475: 375:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
309: 112:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
36:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
640: 542:, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider 479:
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
394:
attacks and weasel words to describe people he doesn't like.
354:, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider 233:, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider 491:. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our 690: 602: 514: 503:. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the 461: 449: 317:. I noticed that you recently removed content from 487:, did not appear to be constructive and have been 550:so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices. 362:so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices. 241:so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices. 501:contributing constructively to this encyclopedia 663:to avoid future confusion with other IP users. 373:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 499:which also provides further information about 495:. You can find information about these at our 196:This applies to talk pages as well. Thank you. 8: 135:For additional information, please see the 120:is in effect. Any administrator may impose 60:For additional information, please see the 45:is in effect. Any administrator may impose 132:, when making edits related to the topic. 57:, when making edits related to the topic. 655:for an IP user, identified by the user's 402:2600:1700:10a2:5cb0:8c51:3029:9eb0:20b5 601:Reply copied from original reply here 124:on editors who do not strictly follow 49:on editors who do not strictly follow 188:living (or recently deceased) persons 7: 548:logging in with an existing account 371:There is currently a discussion at 360:logging in with an existing account 239:logging in with an existing account 137:guidance on discretionary sanctions 62:guidance on discretionary sanctions 319:The Little Mermaid (upcoming film) 182:Please do not add unreferenced or 14: 644: 474: 366: 308: 177: 98: 22: 483:, such as the edit you made to 533:13:56, 20 September 2021 (UTC) 1: 633:15:53, 11 November 2021 (UTC) 617:15:43, 11 November 2021 (UTC) 596:12:19, 11 November 2021 (UTC) 667:also hides your IP address. 576:15:12, 3 November 2021 (UTC) 661:create an account or log in 754: 517:and my edit summary there. 222:09:16, 15 April 2021 (UTC) 207:09:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC) 168:17:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC) 130:page-specific restrictions 93:17:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC) 55:page-specific restrictions 481:your recent contributions 571: 414:12:59, 31 May 2021 (UTC) 389:15:30, 13 May 2021 (UTC) 345:09:49, 11 May 2021 (UTC) 732:Latin America/Caribbean 493:policies and guidelines 298:09:18, 6 May 2021 (UTC) 260:13:53, 5 May 2021 (UTC) 141:Arbitration Committee's 118:discretionary sanctions 66:Arbitration Committee's 43:discretionary sanctions 701:Global contributions 157:Angry Red Hammer Guy 126:Knowledge's policies 82:Angry Red Hammer Guy 51:Knowledge's policies 544:creating an account 356:creating an account 235:creating an account 741: 740: 540:shared IP address 531: 400:comment added by 352:shared IP address 231:shared IP address 184:poorly referenced 745: 648: 641: 565: 546:for yourself or 525: 485:Talk:Mark Milley 478: 465: 438:deleted contribs 416: 370: 369: 358:for yourself or 312: 271: 237:for yourself or 192:Talk:Gina Carano 190:, as you did to 181: 160: 102: 85: 26: 753: 752: 748: 747: 746: 744: 743: 742: 737: 668: 653:discussion page 639: 637: 586:inaccessible. 583: 559: 557: 552: 472: 423: 395: 367: 364: 306: 265: 175: 154: 150: 149: 103: 79: 75: 74: 27: 19: 12: 11: 5: 751: 749: 739: 738: 736: 735: 729: 724: 719: 714: 704: 698: 693: 691:Current blocks 688: 683: 677: 669: 649: 638: 636: 635: 621: 620: 619: 582: 579: 556: 553: 536: 471: 470:September 2021 468: 467: 466: 421:46.97.170.0/24 377:46.97.170.0/24 348: 305: 302: 301: 300: 282: 278: 274: 244: 243: 225: 224: 174: 171: 104: 97: 96: 28: 21: 20: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 750: 733: 730: 728: 725: 723: 720: 718: 715: 713: 709: 705: 702: 699: 697: 694: 692: 689: 687: 686:Proxy Checker 684: 681: 678: 675: 671: 670: 666: 662: 658: 654: 650: 647: 643: 642: 634: 630: 626: 622: 618: 614: 610: 605: 604: 603: 600: 599: 598: 597: 593: 589: 580: 578: 577: 573: 569: 563: 554: 551: 549: 545: 541: 538:If this is a 535: 534: 529: 524: 521: 518: 516: 510: 506: 502: 498: 494: 490: 486: 482: 477: 469: 463: 460: 457: 454: 451: 448: 445: 442: 439: 436: 433: 430: 427: 422: 419: 418: 417: 415: 411: 407: 403: 399: 391: 390: 386: 382: 379:. Thank you. 378: 374: 363: 361: 357: 353: 350:If this is a 347: 346: 342: 338: 335: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 311: 303: 299: 295: 291: 290:46.97.170.112 287: 283: 279: 275: 269: 264: 263: 262: 261: 257: 253: 249: 247: 242: 240: 236: 232: 229:If this is a 227: 226: 223: 219: 215: 214:46.97.170.112 211: 210: 209: 208: 204: 200: 197: 193: 189: 185: 180: 172: 170: 169: 165: 161: 159: 158: 148: 146: 142: 138: 133: 131: 127: 123: 119: 114: 113: 111: 101: 95: 94: 90: 86: 84: 83: 73: 71: 67: 63: 58: 56: 52: 48: 44: 38: 37: 35: 25: 16: 722:Asia-Pacific 651:This is the 623:End of copy 612: 609:46.97.170.79 584: 568:46.97.170.79 558: 537: 528:Boracay Bill 527: 512: 509:my talk page 497:welcome page 473: 458: 452: 446: 440: 434: 428: 396:— Preceding 392: 365: 349: 337:Hockeycatcat 334: 331:my talk page 323:edit summary 315:Hockeycatcat 307: 245: 228: 195: 176: 156: 155: 151: 134: 115: 109: 107: 105: 81: 80: 76: 59: 39: 33: 31: 29: 665:Registering 313:Hello, I'm 199:Sangdeboeuf 657:IP address 520:Wtmitchell 456:block user 450:filter log 173:April 2021 680:Geolocate 555:Talk page 526:(earlier 515:this edit 462:block log 381:Guy Macon 143:decision 128:, or the 122:sanctions 68:decision 53:, or the 47:sanctions 625:Springee 588:Springee 581:Question 562:Springee 489:reverted 432:contribs 410:contribs 398:unsigned 304:May 2021 286:User:JzG 268:Springee 252:Springee 139:and the 108:It does 64:and the 32:It does 717:America 505:sandbox 327:sandbox 727:Europe 712:Africa 696:XTools 682:  676:  523:(talk) 674:WHOIS 166:: --> 91:: --> 17:Alert 708:RIRs 629:talk 613:talk 592:talk 572:talk 444:logs 426:talk 406:talk 385:talk 341:talk 294:talk 256:talk 218:talk 203:talk 162:< 145:here 87:< 70:here 248:], 110:not 34:not 710:: 631:) 615:) 594:) 574:) 511:. 412:) 408:• 387:) 343:) 333:. 296:) 258:) 220:) 205:) 194:. 164:💬 152:— 89:💬 77:— 734:) 706:( 703:) 672:( 627:( 611:( 590:( 570:( 564:: 560:@ 530:) 464:) 459:· 453:· 447:· 441:· 435:· 429:· 424:( 404:( 383:( 339:( 292:( 270:: 266:@ 254:( 216:( 201:(

Index


discretionary sanctions
sanctions
Knowledge's policies
page-specific restrictions
guidance on discretionary sanctions
Arbitration Committee's
here
Angry Red Hammer Guy
💬
17:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

discretionary sanctions
sanctions
Knowledge's policies
page-specific restrictions
guidance on discretionary sanctions
Arbitration Committee's
here
Angry Red Hammer Guy
💬
17:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Information icon
poorly referenced
living (or recently deceased) persons
Talk:Gina Carano
Sangdeboeuf
talk
09:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
46.97.170.112

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.