Knowledge

User talk:56OKLO34

Source đź“ť

17: 46:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
63: 55: 71: 75: 34: 67: 39: 28: 59: 83: 24: 43: 79: 54:
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's
51:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 16: 87: 66:
for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant
42:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 15: 33:
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
74:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 58:to work toward making a version that represents 49:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule 8: 27:shows that you are currently engaged in an 7: 14: 38:—especially if you violate the 23:Your recent editing history at 1: 103: 88:21:10, 25 May 2014 (UTC) 20: 19: 35:blocked from editing 62:among editors. See 72:dispute resolution 21: 40:three-revert rule 25:Ignazio Ciufolini 94: 102: 101: 97: 96: 95: 93: 92: 91: 76:page protection 12: 11: 5: 100: 98: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 99: 90: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 65: 61: 57: 52: 50: 45: 41: 37: 36: 30: 26: 18: 53: 48: 32: 22: 68:noticeboard 60:consensus 56:talk page 70:or seek 47:warring— 29:edit war 80:Cwobeel 44:reverts 84:talk 78:. 64:BRD 86:) 31:. 82:(

Index

Stop icon
Ignazio Ciufolini
edit war
blocked from editing
three-revert rule
reverts
talk page
consensus
BRD
noticeboard
dispute resolution
page protection
Cwobeel
talk
21:10, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑