User talk:69.181.23.220

3578: 1666: 23: 3337: 3161: 2430: 103: 873: 3684: 1751: 1311: 3874: 3466: 1029: 3053: 2558: 2302: 2161: 2056: 1545: 1443: 1162: 710: 3955: 3352:, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See 1484:

template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons

2982:

Me Too movement page's source code begins: The Me Too movement (or #MeToo movement), with many local and international alternatives, is a movement against<!--For the sake of professionalism and complying with Knowledge guidelines, please refrain from using the word "rape" in this article when

3263:

you included material from a webpage that is available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this

2719:

If you don't want to become a registered user, would you mind (if can) make your "Active Measures" live (I would become the first author then)? ...Since waiting in "Draft" may not only be long (being an IP user doesn't help) it may not even pass (and the article is already better than many I have

1003:

the one link is from the deceased subject of the article youtube account, describing production. mention of numerous formats is important because they are no longer are available and do not have contemporary equivalents. that was a gross delete, you could have read the content first...

3511:) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Knowledge. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Knowledge's 3382:) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Knowledge. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Knowledge's 3094:) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Knowledge. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Knowledge's 2595:) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Knowledge. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Knowledge's 2198:) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Knowledge. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Knowledge's 1355:) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Knowledge. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Knowledge's 1074:) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Knowledge. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Knowledge's 750:) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Knowledge. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Knowledge's 1890:. And you linked to ftc.gov; the article you linked to would not generally be appropriate in the External links section, but may be used to provide a citation elsewhere in the article. As such, I find your block legitimate and decline your unblock request. 894:

nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See

3541:

the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Knowledge's

3412:

3124:

2625:

2228:

2119:

1608:

1385:

1104:

780:

455:

2093:) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Knowledge. If the external link you inserted or changed was to an image file on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Knowledge's 1582:) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Knowledge. If the external link you inserted or changed was to an image file on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Knowledge's 3773:

Links should be evaluated for inclusion with due care on a case-by-case basis. Links to online videos should also identify additional software necessary for readers to view the content. <removed personal attack:

907:

attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.

3309:

I am aware that it's not an exact copy but it's close enough to have been picked up by a bot as being a potential copyright violation. It's quite a close paraphrase, hence the need to provide attribution. —

3364:

attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.

370: 3641:

This IP has about 6 months of warnings without showing any sign of willing to improve or adapt, and almost seems to seek the conflict instead. I have therefore blocked for the same time. --

1886:, I see you linked to legacy.com, which is arguably appropriate. You provided two links to youtube.com, which were almost certainly violating copyright and are expressly discouraged by 1951: 3638:

You have been warned sufficiently above, and I just left you a message yesterday. There was no reasonto revert last edit, the youtube link was totally unneccesary in that edit

2286:

You added an unnecessary link to a channel. Please read our external links guideline, you are too often in contrast with our inclusion standards and risk lengthy blocks. --

849:{{external media | float = | width = | image1 = | image2 = | image3 = | audio1 = | audio2 = | audio3 = | video1 = | video2 = | video3 = | model1 = | model2 = | model3 = }} 3064:

have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on

2569:

have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on

2172:

have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on

2067:

have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on

1556:

have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on

721:

have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on

1835:

The block notice does not contain a specific reason or a specific edit why an administrator has blocked this ip address from editing. XLinkBot cannot distinguish WP:RS

3782:

videos about russian assaults on american sovereignty. XLinkBot randomly complains about YouTube links which are not prohibited, especially from revered newspapers.

3926:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

730: 2877: 2775: 3842:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

2876: 2774: 1924:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

395:

Welcome to Knowledge. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page

3899:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 3724: 1791: 138: 3013: 2409:. The disambiguation page should contain the text necessary to distinguish between similar items. Any clarification of the term Donnybrook belongs in 1517:, but it was not a direct copy and references were checked, and additional material was included, because Gail Borden's history was more complete at 2983:

this political movement is strictly about workplace sexual harassment in a non-legal context with propagandist aims. ~ Roman J. Lane, Esquire--: -->

2901: 2799: 1952:

https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/commission_decision_volumes/volume-86/ftc_volume_decision_86_july_-_december_1975pages_825-920.pdf

3519:. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our 3390:. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our 3102:. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our 2603:. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our 2206:. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our 1363:. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our 1082:. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our 758:. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our 433:. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our 2686:

Thank you for the creation of "Draft:Active Measures (2018 film)". Please become a registered User, as there are article creation benefits ....

417:) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Knowledge. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a 3264:

particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. —

1462:

does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Knowledge, this is supplied at minimum in an

529: 3850:

For the record, I endorse the redaction and rev-deletion of the personal attack from the above message, and had intended to do it myself.

1941:

IN THE MATTER OF WILSONS HOUSE OF SUEDE , ET AL. CONSENT ORDER , ETC. , IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATiON OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT

3827: 3783: 3719: 3598: 3296: 3238: 3208: 3028: 2992: 2511: 2391: 2310: 2270: 2007: 1909: 1786: 1686: 1645: 1522: 1447: 1422: 1291: 1261: 1236: 1170: 1141: 1005: 941: 853: 817: 686: 663: 510: 500: 374: 239: 133: 43: 1486: 1285: 659: 626: 1579: 3973: 2748: 2698: 2353: 1205: 929: 540: 196: 3895:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

3014:

https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/usersearch.py?name=Roman+J.+Lane%2C+Esquire&page=Me+Too+movement&max=500&server=enwiki

2458: 2382: 3547: 3482: 3418: 3349: 3130: 2631: 2234: 2125: 1614: 1391: 1110: 1045: 975: 891: 786: 461: 3451:

we only list one. With your revision we would list two. I do note that I have warned you before with your interpretation of

2747:. The sources you are using are outdated. This is actually explained fully in the article, but I have started a discussion at 260:

Okay, try not to make so many repetitive edits so quickly. It does cause a misconception, that this was being done by a bot.—

3293:

a direct copy but close paraphrase because this is a precise technical description. Thanks for adding additional attribution.

1993: 2720:

seen started). The film is already showing in large city theaters, per a quick Fandango check. It would be beneficial to

3855: 3813: 2187: 2169: 524: 2709:& the possibility of someone else editing on this IP address (potentially ruining your hard fought reputation). See 3534: 3405: 3117: 2710: 2618: 2221: 2112: 1601: 1378: 1097: 773: 556: 448: 3738: 3626: 2349: 1805: 1732: 1201: 925: 570: 152: 84: 4016: 3696:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

3530: 3401: 3113: 2716:

Being a registered user will also increase your credibility among the editing community, to say nothing of Admins.

2614: 2217: 2108: 1763:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

1597: 1374: 1093: 769: 444: 3489:

tags, additions of links to Knowledge will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be

1052:

tags, additions of links to Knowledge will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be

3697: 3586: 3490: 3187: 2496:

in this unusual case, there are nested disambiguation pages that would probably be better served by putting all

2450: 1764: 1674: 1316: 1053: 887: 739: 718: 701: 31: 3968:. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may 3851: 3809: 3691: 3526: 3470: 3397: 3353: 3341: 3233: 3109: 3069: 2986:

So, what is your question? Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me • my contributions) 11:44, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

2610: 2574: 2213: 2177: 2104: 2072: 1866: 1758: 1593: 1561: 1370: 1330: 1089: 1033: 896: 877: 765: 726: 440: 188: 110: 3448: 2537: 2470: 2034: 1225: 1190: 562: 353: 334: 270: 184: 68: 4004: 3508: 2317:

have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the

1177:

have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the

612: 496: 236: 2327:

Stop adding Donnybrook fair. It's already in the article! Also, the text you added is much too long, see

373:

I did research and archiving for that page and wanted to invite them to help. Also FIU is deleting pages.

3889: 3867: 3702: 3018: 2756: 2744: 2692: 1769: 608: 292: 224: 208: 116: 3653: 1948:

WILSONS fraud consent order was set in external links because no context to add a section was found yet

322: 2752: 2457:

above) has explained why the edit is not appropriate. Note, however, that I have expanded the lead at

1858:" channels, these are not user channels, also XLinkBot cannot distinguish other WP:RS at youtube like 1489:. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — 3927: 3260: 1459: 630: 422: 232: 4035: 3982: 1745:

blocked for reasons of adding reliably sourced content content that the administrator disagrees with

4030: 3896: 3500: 3474: 3195: 3175: 2949: 2847: 2528:) for "Donnybrook" and therefore isn't included in the list of articles at the disambiguation page 2438: 2322: 2094: 1583: 1344: 1326: 1278: 1182: 616: 3930:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 2670:

No, you're not also getting a section at ANI. You already have a barely comprehensible one on AN.

1580:

https://boygeniusreport.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/screen-shot-2018-08-01-at-1-33-16-pm.png?w=782

1071: 960:

Avoid YouTube, using IMDB as a source. That it was released in numerous formats is not necessary.

3776: 3559: 3430: 3229: 3142: 3065: 2893: 2791: 2702: 2643: 2570: 2533: 2491: 2466: 2246: 2173: 2137: 2068: 2025: 1847: 1626: 1557: 1403: 1334: 1221: 1186: 1166: 1122: 798: 722: 515: 473: 344: 301: 261: 204: 200: 192: 59: 425:

file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Knowledge's

1854:

is a youtube/Google channel managed by youtube and the content rights holders, as are all the "

3969: 3938: 3630: 3551: 3512: 3422: 3383: 3318: 3272: 3183: 3171: 3134: 3095: 2897: 2795: 2721: 2635: 2596: 2446: 2357: 2318: 2238: 2199: 2129: 1736: 1618: 1497: 1474:. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted 1463: 1395: 1356: 1209: 1178: 1114: 1075: 986: 965: 933: 913: 790: 751: 536: 465: 426: 318: 285: 216: 88: 3503: