298:
123:
26:
276:
333:
165:
221:. Whether it is right or wrong (and I neither know nor care), simply continuing to revert your edit based on your ranting diatribe will only result in, at best, the article being semi-protected, and at worst, your being blocked from editing. Either way you will have no further ability to directly edit the article.
186:
As for the three revert rule, it is only you and your sock-puppets and meat-puppets who have broken that rule. I first reverted the page at 14:34, 19 April 2015 and so I am going to place the dispute tag on the page again now. Which by the way has to stay until the dispute has been resolved. So you
216:
because I shall have no hesitation in raising a separate, but linked, ANI case, not to mention an SPI case (as you are hell bent on accusing everyone else) should you continue in your current vein. I have merely attempted to point out to you what is required for you to be able to change the content
149:
before engaging further. Basically, you should not directly edit any article in which you have a conflict of interest. If you wish to contribute to the article, you should propose what changes you want made on the talk page using the {{request edit}} template. This flags a proposed edit elsewhere
180:
It is interesting to me to see how everyone who tries to point out the truth about this article is blocked banned mocked and otherwise discriminated against. Very curious indeed. There is obviously some agenda going on here which a group of sockpuppets at wikipedia have managed to encircle. Well it
192:
If anyone takes your side and edits the page then their integrity is not pulled into question, but it anyone takes the side of OBJECTIVITY like the IP who edited this morning, then you say it is
Sockpuppetry. I think those who cry "sockpuppet sockpuppet" all the time are more than likely expert at
175:
While I am not taking sides on this issue, the diatribe that you posted to the talk page is wholly unacceptable because even the caption flagged it as a rant and others will treat it as such as was demonstrated. I am not surprised that it was deleted, though the person deleting had no right to do
211:
You may wish to reconsider what you have written and strike the allegations that you have made. I stated clearly above that I have no agenda and am not taking sides either for you or against you in the article content, and as far as I am aware I have not. It may be that you could be on the
193:
sockpuppetry themselves. I have already stated that I am willing to prove my identity to official and well known admins. I do not have anything to hide. As soon as one of them contacts me I will oblige. Until then I would appreciate you stop harrassing me.
144:
with preserving the neutrality of the article. Articles on religious subjects attract attention from many editors who have a vested interest in both promoting and denigrating whatever religious topic is under discussion. You should review the policies at
55:
139:
Finally, you have publically stated at the article talk page that you are a
Christian Zionist. You have therefore publically stated that you have a direct connection with the article's subject matter. That is to say: that you have a
181:
is a pity for the
English language audience. Bare in mind that every empire crumbles and your little troop will see its time come. You may have pulled the wool over the eyes of some admin, but you will not be able to fool all of them.
150:
so that others can review your request, and also flags it as a conflict of interest request. Your request must be in the format of "Please change X to Y. Reason: (whatever). Supporting references: (references)." If you can't find
61:
68:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
99:. Though not technically guilty of a voilation of the three revert rule (though see next paragraph), this number of reverts is still regarded as being involved in an edit war. (See also
290:
30:
306:
302:
286:
285:, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Knowledge accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
117:
249:
194:
351:
60:
54:
394:
111:
106:
You also appear to have made a fourth revert at the same article using an alternate dynamic and proxy IP address
346:. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
316:
235:
382:
281:
127:
133:
107:
187:
should learn your revise your policy knowledge on that before you also become counted as a sockpuppet.
413:
360:
38:
408:
312:
231:
213:
158:
37:
and
Knowledge pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
34:
347:
95:. You need to ensure that you are familiar with the three reverts rule which can be found at
77:
418:
218:
92:
120:). Since the reversion is the only edit that this IP address has made in over two years,
339:
332:
52:
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
146:
100:
96:
151:
73:
398:
366:
403:
230:
I do not have the time to persue this further today, but I will have tomorrow.
155:
343:
320:
257:
239:
202:
81:
372:
387:
307:
IP editor resorting to abuse and malicious allegations against other users.
305:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
25:
248:
I have asked you to stop harrassing me. Please do not post here again.
46:
327:
91:
You have made three reverts within 24 hours at the article
377:
291:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/79.109.203.252
16:Apparently I am unable to edit my own user page.
161:, then I wouldn't bother, as it will only get a
350:to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
303:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
8:
342:for an IP user, identified by the user's
41:. There are two ways to do this. Either:
49:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
7:
301:There is currently a discussion at
132:. You should review the policy at
289:, then respond to the evidence at
270:Right, I have had enough of this.
14:
331:
296:
274:
163:
121:
64:) located above the edit window.
59:
53:
24:
1:
354:also hides your IP address.
348:create an account or log in
441:
321:16:18, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
258:18:28, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
240:18:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
203:17:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
82:09:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
33:. When you add content to
253:
198:
419:Latin America/Caribbean
287:notes for the suspect
280:You are suspected of
212:receiving end of the
388:Global contributions
142:conflict of interest
31:welcome to Knowledge
428:
427:
128:Looks like a duck
20:Your recent edits
432:
335:
328:
300:
299:
278:
277:
219:Crimean Karaites
172:as a response.
171:
167:
166:
125:
124:
93:Crimean Karaites
63:
57:
28:
440:
439:
435:
434:
433:
431:
430:
429:
424:
355:
340:discussion page
326:
324:
309:. Thank you.
297:
275:
268:
164:
162:
134:WP:SOCKPUPPETRY
122:
108:149.254.235.196
89:
39:sign your posts
22:
12:
11:
5:
438:
436:
426:
425:
423:
422:
416:
411:
406:
401:
391:
385:
380:
378:Current blocks
375:
370:
364:
356:
336:
325:
313:DieSwartzPunkt
273:
267:
264:
262:
250:79.109.203.252
247:
245:
244:
243:
242:
232:DieSwartzPunkt
225:
224:
223:
222:
206:
205:
195:79.109.203.252
189:
188:
183:
182:
88:
85:
66:
65:
50:
21:
18:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
437:
420:
417:
415:
412:
410:
407:
405:
402:
400:
396:
392:
389:
386:
384:
381:
379:
376:
374:
373:Proxy Checker
371:
368:
365:
362:
358:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
334:
330:
329:
323:
322:
318:
314:
310:
308:
304:
294:
293:. Thank you.
292:
288:
284:
283:
282:sock puppetry
271:
265:
263:
260:
259:
255:
251:
241:
237:
233:
229:
228:
227:
226:
220:
215:
210:
209:
208:
207:
204:
200:
196:
191:
190:
185:
184:
179:
178:
177:
173:
170:
160:
157:
153:
148:
143:
137:
135:
131:
129:
119:
116:
113:
109:
104:
102:
98:
94:
86:
84:
83:
79:
75:
72:Thank you. --
70:
62:
56:
51:
48:
44:
43:
42:
40:
36:
32:
27:
19:
17:
409:Asia-Pacific
338:This is the
311:
295:
279:
272:
269:
261:
246:
214:WP:BOOMERANG
174:
168:
141:
138:
126:
114:
105:
90:
71:
67:
23:
15:
352:Registering
344:IP address
266:April 2015
156:verifiable
87:April 2015
35:talk pages
29:Hello and
367:Geolocate
45:Add four
169:Not done
152:reliable
118:contribs
404:America
159:sources
74:SineBot
414:Europe
399:Africa
383:XTools
369:
363:
147:WP:COI
101:WP:BRD
97:WP:3RR
47:tildes
361:WHOIS
130:to me
395:RIRs
317:talk
254:talk
236:talk
199:talk
176:so.
154:and
112:talk
78:talk
217:of
103:.)
58:or
397::
319:)
256:)
238:)
201:)
136:.
80:)
421:)
393:(
390:)
359:(
315:(
252:(
234:(
197:(
115:·
110:(
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
