User talk:ASCIIn2Bme

1159:

problems have to do with a naive and sloppy application of Reliable Sources. You may not agree with me about the truth thing, but I think we agree that the guidelines on using sources needs a lot of work. Too many editors think that any publication is sufficient to establish a source as reliable. I do not even believe that an article by a PhD in a peer-reviewed journal is necessarily reliable for anything more than "X believes Y." An article written by an acknowleged expert in a top journal may nevertheless express a fringe theory, or speculation - one has to wait for time to pass to see if the view ends up accepted by peers as significant or mainstream. Similarly after many years great research can be proven wrong or surpassed. Finally, an article that is a top scholarship may contain within it statements which are speculative, tangential, opinion. To be able to draw these distinctions one must read a LOT more than most editors here are willing to read ... but I think our RS guidelines need to provide criteria for distinguishing between these kinds of claims. My point is that a source may be reliable for some things but not others. based on your recent comments I think you might agree...

896: 1539:("imprisonment, parole and probation") both of which are difficult to restate without changing their meaning substantially, is very unlikely to be considered copyright violation in any court of law. You should note that it appears in many books that don't cite anyone for that fact, nor do they put it in quotes. Anyway, the current version doesn't even have that sentence anymore. ¶ If copyright violation was your concern, you should have changed or removed the text, instead of removing the citation. Removing the citation ironically turned it into plagiarism by erasing any attribution. ¶ Anyway, I've also changed the grandfathered definition of correctional system. You're welcome to improve it further. 4472: 1016:

renaming process for it to Hungarian war of 1919. I know this title was not a best solution and we are short on English sources about it. One article could negotiate everything in connection with this theme ('Interventions'). When I saw this proposal is pointless I 'recreated' the 'Allied intervention in Hungary' page'. I did not want to misuse with the sources, It is my fault, I did not read the sources properly (I am not English). It should be a 'summary' page about these subjects. Maybe 'Interventions in Hungary (1918-20) would be better title.

3308:. ¶ Besides the tone on the talk page, it is actually pretty difficult to find sources for an article like that which aren't immediately dismissible as gossip columns/TV or product promotions. So it's easy to see the double standards in that discussion where each side was harping on the low quality of the sources the other side was using, while ignoring the quality issues with the sources they wanted to cite. Academic efforts in that area are rather scanty, but I did propose one such source for consideration 3431:

times (sorry about that, everyone), but my reasoning was this spiral thread was tl;drallofitjustparts and I wanted to be sure to note focus for specific subsections. That didn't seem to work so well for yourself and SandyGeorgia, the two working the hardest on this project. I apologize if this inflamed the conversation on both of your parts. I misspoke in emphasis on how view the previous case from last summer, since as noted it was not well documented, and I was accounting from memory.

1221:: "It is best to avoid changing your own comments. Other users may have already quoted you with a diff (see above) or have otherwise responded to your statement. Substantially altering a comment after it has been replied to may deny the reply of its original context. It can also be confusing. Before you change your own comment, consider taking one of the following steps: Contact the person(s) who replied (through their talk page) and ask if it is okay to delete or change your text. ". 3062: 3172: 3132: 573: 4328: 32: 2353:, were you referring to me? I do not recall modifying it. And believe me, I would have loved to modify it (if such were permitted) to show its true intent (it's one discussed and rejected on the Muhammad Images talk page for being biased and solely purposed to remove all images due to religious objections with the additional bias of implying all those images have no value). Best, Rob 171: 4582: 4383: 3618: 3453: 2182: 1354: 1243: 258: 2834:(d. 1304), who was tutored by a Buddhist and converted to Islam later not out of personal conviction, but out of political expediency; in fact he did not live according to Muslim precepts. (It was Ghazan who appointed Rashid-al-Din, who converted from Judaism for possibly similar reasons and wrote the Jami al-Tawarikh). -- 1182:. I'm sorry, but being literal and objective is my primary mode of communication, which seems to irritate you intensely. So I'll skip the analysis and get right to the point, do you want to back off and clean up the talk page, or should I take this to ANI and request a topic ban be imposed on you at WT:TPG and WP:TPG? 3843:

only allow myself active involvement in one painful article at a time. Unbelievably, an article about merit badges has become a second one, and I'm totally disgusted at what has happened here. I'm leaving." was probably unrelated. I was temporarily confused there because an IP added a post by North8000 (in quotes)

3755:

on Betacommand were a valid response by the community to prior problems with Betacommand's editing, and that Betacommand was required to abide by those sanctions if he wished to continue editing. However, given that interpretation and implementation of those sanctions has led to ongoing disputes, the

2290:

You make a personal comment on an editor, and when it gets removed twice (by two different editors), you claim that "Too much time is wasted pandering to trolls here", clearly implying that the editor you commented on is a troll. The other comment, comparing Knowledge to the Jerry Springer show, is a

1138:

I'm removing all the policies and guidelines from my watch list, effective immediately. I came to the conclusion that editing there is a serious time drain and found the atmosphere rather unpleasant. I have no intention to spend 95% of my wiki time in sterile arguments about some wording that hardly

553:

Since them, Schießpulver became generic to include other kinds of "shooting powder" and Sprengpulver became generic for all kinds of explosives. You should not code your bot or make your edits expecting natural languages to have 1:1 match for all terms. Also, in your post above the English is rather

3426:

It seems my post mixed signals with yourself and SandyGeorgia. I apologize for misunderstanding of my intentions of my post regarding CU information and Rlevse/BarkingMoon. My point was that when we find a CheckUser on SPI to be as Kirill phrased it, "ambiguous", it is sent back to the clerks and

3377:

I genuinely have no opinion about the mental health of any of the individuals in that debate, except for one, who explained he is on the autism spectrum. I would never suggest or imply such an opinion even if I were ever to form one about an individual. I would appreciate it if you would believe me

3365:

I think I need to explain something clearer than I have. I had no intention of discussing the prevalence of poor social sensitivity on Knowledge. But when Hans brought it up, in a rather brutal way, and it looked like he was being misunderstood, I felt I should contribute my two cents. I was trying

2857:

I find your style of argumentation which essentially consists of stating that (1) I am wrong , and (2) stating an unrelated fact quite amusing, but it gets tiresome after a short while. If you dispute any further edits of mine, it's better that we discuss them on the article's talk page, so others

2812:

And since you're so fond of the "mainstream Islam" phraseology, I feel like quoting a phrase I serendipitously found: "The Samanids liberated Islam from its narrow Arab bedouin background and mores and made of it an international culture and society. They showed that Islam also was not bound to the

2117:

You contributed to a recent discussion about an editor who was creating many stubs. The conclusion was that this was just a case of a prolific editor, with no violation of policy. There remains a question about whether very small stubs are useful, regardless of how they are created. You may want to

798:

Please please please learn how to use the preview button. The revision history of William Muir is an absolute mess because you have made ~75 edits in the last two days, and most of them are minor wording changes. Saving every minor change makes review of your edits nearly impossible, and will often

4400:

Hello ASCIIn2Bme. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Knowledge, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The

3842:

I misinterpreted "Beback continued adding tags in a campaign (see it's history) he's been carrying on for 6 months or so." as involving other articles because of the long alleged time span. I guess he was referring just to that one article then. The other "painful article" in "To keep my sanity, I

3762:

After one year has elapsed from the date of his ban, Betacommand may request that the ban be lifted. As part of any such request, Betacommand shall be required to submit a plan outlining his intended editing activity and demonstrating his understanding of and intention to refrain from the actions

2399:

Ah... got it. The indenting and such on that page kinda had me lost. Thanks for the clarification. I was worrying I might have dropped something in an edit conflict or such... (took a chunk of AN/I out during an edit conflict that didnt get caught by the software - fortunately someone else noticed

2384:

I was referring to the text of the RfC itself which says that more examples are going to be added later. In the current examples the image used did not seem that incidental to me, as I have commented there. There's a weird disconnect between what the RfC asks and what examples it provides. I don't

3430:

This is the process that is happening now, and I for one appreciate your bringing forward the detailed evidence the community would like to see. I have no position one way or the other on how the community acts, my post was simply to focus discussion. This is also why I annoying posted it three

214:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be

4011:

A premature RFC, before the issue has even been correctly formulated and positioned, is guaranteed to crater anything useful, and is precisely what many of us were worried would happen if a bunch of people started in there. Would you please reconsider holding off on RFC until we know what we're

2981:

After engaging the ABF engine for a while, I realized why one might think that example may be relevant to the case—figurative images. I agree with you that it was bad form for me to comment that one out, although I've done it because the examples given don't actually exist in Knowledge articles.

1603:

and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also

1015:

The theme of Interventions in Hungary(1918-20) had no page . The original page for this was redirected to ???1848???. Originally I intended to expand the article of Hungarian Romanian War 1919, because the Hungarian-Czechoslovak war and the Hungarian-Serb conflict have no page. So I proposed a

225:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can

1158:

I may be reading my own views into your comments, but something you wrote on the talk page struck me as very constructive. it had something to do with avoiding a knee-jerk view of "reliable sources." I do not believe there is any problem with the "... not truth" formula; I think many of the

420:

But the article did NOT make a claim of significance. That was the problem. And when I tagged the article, it had no references and only stated that it was an amusement park, which clearly does not make any claim of significance. When you removed the tag, the article still had no claim of

4354:

so we can close the case. If there are still issues that need to be addressed, let us know. If your mediator has become inactive, also let us know. The case will be closed in one month if it remains inactive. You can let us know what's going on by sending a message through to your mediator,

2011:

pages are not Knowledge, and are for discussing development of the global Wiki project - any other comments concerning routine editing on local Wikipedias , and particularly ones about the behaviour of individuals are misplaced, are a disruption to this process, and are possible

405:

Is there a rule somewhere that articles need to have more than one reliable source? And is there a rule that the speedy deletion tag can only be deleted afterwards? From CSD#A7 it seems the opposite is the case: "The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of

4033:

Well, a request for comments is not necessarily a vote, although the existing discussion was partly that. The proposal to elevate it to policy was simple enough, although the other proposed steps for better enforcement were more nebulous. Before I saw your message here, I had added it to

1434:

for deletion as well, because there are slight variations in terminology, "Correctional" instead of "Corrections" etc., and there's no source cited saying that they are all really, really Department of Corrections. And going back to your edits, you repeatedly removed the citation for the

799:

lead to rollbacks and reverting to previous versions. Please preview every edit you make to an article, and make sure that consecutive edits are substantive. A single incident of making a substantive edit followed by a minor change is significantly different from several dozen in a row.

3280:, you've said that "both sides behaved subpar if one peruses the talk page." Similar sentiment expressed in outside view. While I'm mostly inactive, that's probably not a permanent thing, so I'd appreciate any feedback on my participations. So that I may do better next time, I mean. 1375:, I made it very clear to you that you had placed the citation in the wrong place within the paragraph. Once you corrected your error, I acknowledged the correction and have not since removed the citation. Since then, posting a 3-revert rule warning on my talk page smacks of violating 3427:

admins to process based on behavioral evidence. It is rare that such circumstance as the one that we're involved in currently to happen, and my intention was to focus on gathering behavioral evidence if we want to start a consensus for a sock or not, which never happened previously.

2882:

I responded to one of your comments to my proposals on the workshop page before realizing that all of your responses are (as best I can tell) nonsensical. At least, I can't make heads or tails of what you're trying to say. can you rewrite your posts in a less elliptical fashion?

4278:

session in #wikimedia-office on IRC at 19:00 UTC (11am Pacific time). If you can make it, please do; we'll have a lot of stuff to show you and talk about, including (hopefully) a timetable of when we're planning to do what. If you can't come, for whatever reason, let me know on

1817:

general fixes tool in script format. That does not constitute bot activity. It would be considered bot activity if he were making a large number of edits in a short period of time. He was not, he was carefully reviewing each edit before saving the page, per his restrictions.

3335:

discussion. The Article Rescue Squadron was notified, and as notifications to previous involved parties isn't normal practise, I and a few ARS members agreed that, in the interests of transparency and fairness, we should let everyone know...hence this talkpage message ;).

3252:

I have deleted the RFC/U as having been improperly certified, since it was premised on the unproven assertion that Ash and Fae are the same person. You are welcome to create a fresh RFC/U on Fae alone, but it should not include unproven allegations of other identities.

3369:

Some individuals that defend that position will suffer from autism or psychopathy but many others will defend the position because, though they have healthy social sensitivity and prefer not to offend, they believe it is wrong to compromise openness in any degree.

2276:, and also explain how my comment is substantively different from the comparison of Knowledge with a Jerry Springer show that the other user engaged in, which is equivalent to saying "you guys collectively don't rise above the level of a Jerry Springer audience". 4052:

We are not ready for an RFC-- the proposal is not well formed, and issues should be hammered out first. I'd much prefer that you revert yourself and remove the RFC. I think that's the best way forward on this, and will result in less unproductive use of time.

980:(multiple consecutive edits by the same user) as a good example of the problem. I left a comment on the talk page there as well. I don't think this is something ANI can handle, because it requires an editor to read history sources carefully, like yourself :-)" 3592:"By the way, if anyone can imitate My76Strat's elaborate phrases on talk pages, I'd "buy" them a wiki-beer or two. I suspect User:Floquenbeam might succeed if they set their mind on the task" - you at AN or ANI, although I'm not going to try to find the diff. 603:, which I can see are well-intentioned. Unfortunately, the way you have been doing it has probably breached Knowledge guidelines which led to me receiving this notice on my talk page today (which I will paste in below). Please have a look at the discussion at 2001:, and I would ask you to accept that in spite of the number of seemingly childish contributors who try to use the encyclopedia as a social networking site, the majority of serious registered users are mature adults and university graduates. 1107:

The policy as written is about making improper comments about others. I think it would be helpful to expand it to include improper personal comments in general. I haven't looked into the policy history to see what attempts have been done to do this in the

3081:

I do hope you will consider offering suggestions. It's late here, so I'm off to bed, but I proposed this as one who has observed dispute resolution on WP for nearly four years. It's not perfect, but it could work. We won't know if we don't try. Regards,

2505: 855:

Besides, the history tab allows one to select a grup of time-contiguous edits and see them as one diff, so the argument that reviewing multiple consecutive edits by one editor is much more difficult than reviewing a single large edit is rather tenuous.

2779:

True, my edit summary was inaccurate read in isolation, but there's only so much space in that box. The removal of that sentence fragment was appropriate though. The Buddhist tradition in Iran had been stomped pretty well at this point. First, the

1623:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned 483:

Looking at your talk page and edit history, you seem to have significant trouble understanding or following deletion rules. Perhaps you should slow down from tagging for deletion umpteen articles per hour, and spend more time improving articles.

203:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 1486:

Unless I'm mistaken, when you copy and paste copyrighted material (such as that found in Black's Law Dictionary) verbatim, you are plagiarizing. Unless, of course, you place the pasted text into quotes and directly cite the source, as in:

2028:

I hope you'll take this message in the good faith with which it is intended, and that pending this investigation, you will moderate you future participation both here on Knowledge, and on the Foundation pages. Regards,

227: 4262:

You're being contacted because you participated in a discussion that touched on (or was about) how Knowledge treats new pages, new editors, and the people who deal with both - patrollers. I'm happy to say we've started work on

4401:

survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

1462:

I'm also amused how on one hand you complain above about plagiarism, and on the other you continue to delete references claiming that the text I added to Knowledge does not follow the sources cited close enough.

4646:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 4523: 3373:

I'm worried that you think I believe you or others in the debate are mentally ill: I have no reason to. Or that I am implying it as a rhetorical tactic. I have made no such suggestion. This isn't dog whistling.

3010:

I mainly thought the guideline as a whole was relevant to the case and therefore you shouldn't be making substantial changes to it - that has got people into trouble before if they then rely on that section. --

3915:

Per advice from a checkuser, I consider the matter closed until Rlevse decides to return again, if ever. Even then, it will be best to let him explain himself on this before taking any further action. Regards,

1177:

Things calmed down after I noted that we had found a point of agreement, and for the last couple of days I have ignored a discussion in which I have no involvement. Just now I checked back, only to discover a

1139:

ever gets enforced, especially arguing with "policy wonks" who seem to hardly ever edit any article. The only way to keep up with them is probably to become like them, and I have no intention of doing that.

4465: 549:

explosives, Schwarzpulver was sometimes subdivided in Sprengpulver (blasting powder) and Schießpulver (shooting powder, in direct translation) based on intended usage with small variations in formulation.

4343: 4305: 3644: 819:"will often lead to rollbacks and reverting to previous versions." That has never happened to me before. The only time it happened is when someone strongly disagreed with part of the (sourced) contents. 4461: 2798:. The Mongols were influenced by Buddhism indeed, but not so much from Iran, but rather by Buddhism from further east in their empire, particularly China, with which they had contact way before anyway. 3959:

I do think there's an ongoing problem with Director's method of engagement with other editors, but as RL is keeping me pretty busy and I'm enjoying the break, I've pulled the draft for the time being.

636:

Thank you for your interest in my book - but I hope you will see how it is negatively affecting my reputation on the WP. Do leave me a note on my talk page if you have any concerns. All best wishes,

4267:, a suite of software that will replace Special:NewPages and hopefully make it a more pleasant experience for all. Please take a look, read about what we're planning to do, and add any notes on the 3296:

Given that the RfC is on Fæ, I thought it wasn't that appropriate to bring up the names of other users, hence my vagueness. Rest assured, I was not referring to you specifically. But comments like

1795:

I believe you, but the proposals are to allow you to do repetitive stuff (aka patterns) some of which are normally done by bots, so semi-automated tasks is probably a good way do describe it. From

2719: 2711: 1939:

who edits on Polish Knowledge—see my user page. I've requested my account to be renamed again to an ASCII one because having this distinctive user name is not worth all the drama it has caused.

3366:

to make the point that an organisation that disregards offensiveness is displaying a trait common to certain types of mental illness, but I was saying nothing about individuals in that debate.

4530: 1422:." (The angle brackets and italics are in original. Page xxvi in the 9th ed. explains "6. Angle Brackets Contextual illustrations of a headword are given in angle brackets".) Then you found a 2230:

There is a current discussion to TOPIC ban him, which is a completely different thing. Apart from that: his real or perceived mistakes don't make it allright for you to engage in PAs on him.

2478: 2154: 2146: 1524: 2598:

Well, then, since you're semi-retired and no longer very active on Knowledge, I assume we'll just wait for someone who thinks like you do to find your tag and make the corrections you want.

3228:

I've occasionally edited as an IP before stretching back a few years, and learned that open editing in practice means that IPs get reverted unless they add "perfectly executed" citations.

2558:

section. In the absence of an alternative explanation or reference supporting the alleged UK difference, I propose to remove the globalize tag after including a main article link to the

1217:

Also, please be aware that changing your own post that I had replied to without ever notifying me that you have done that, even if done in good faith, is an action in slight violation of

3311:. I do not have a real interest in the area, so I won't be contributing any further to it, but I do admit I was curious as to whether better sources for something like that existed. 1498:. Just copying and pasting - even with a reference - is just lazy. And bad writing of the worst kind. I don't believe you're the original plagiarizer, but now you're defending it. -- 3213:

I notice your first edit was a perfectly executed citation and your 5th was a perfectly executed redirect. Have you edited under another account (not mörser)? Have we met before? --

2451: 4694: 4689: 2637: 2306: 3893:

I disagree on the "theatrics", but I will say this: If any of that proves to be factual rather than conjecture - then I will indeed apologize in whatever forum you desire. —

3610:

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that My76Strat-like is who you are. Some people have more acting talent than others. Since I wrote that, I've also discovered the skills of

2307:

an editor who was topic banned from astrology for "poisoning the well"-type comments with other group-level comparisons like comparing those who disagree with him with the KKK

984:

However, the redirection was justified in my opinion. If you see the original text of the page, that was about historical movements in 1918-20. It had nothing to do with 1848.

2707: 1565:

Actually, I only removed the citation while it was positioned badly in the article. Once it was moved to the more appropriate location I've left it intact. Nice try though.--

1991:, and also operate other accounts, and under all of them you apparently do not feel welcome here anymore. Perhaps you could take a moment to consider why. You state: 1366: 977:

in order to push a POV, which is mostly about the title, but also involving plain misuse of sources, cited to say the opposite of what they actually state. See this diff

3740: 2623: 2444: 2142: 67: 1523:

has copyright violations in spades, but hardly any plagiarism as they don't bother hiding that they're merely ripping off others' intellectual property. By definition,

4114: 3752: 3529: 2198: 1631:. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible. 391:

Yet you have yet to provide more than one reliable source for the article. If it is truly significant, you should source it and then remove the speedy deletion tag.

307:

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a

2922:

Suit yourself. It was copyediting in response to a UK IP address' comments on talk, some of which were well justified. The changes were not substantial in my view.

4304:

I think the Rfc is nearly finalized, but only a few editors have commented recently, not including you. Could you take a look & let us know what you think at

647:

I have just discovered that you have set me up (by adding a "pipe" link to my name) and then attacked me and my credibility on the Talk page of the article on the

4298: 2902:

I reverted your commenting out due to your involvement in the Muhammad arbitration case - I think given your involvement there you should let someone else do it.

895: 328:

I was editing the article. I didn't know what the "db-person" template meant. I thought "db" stood for database. The article cites academic journal sources that

3332: 1761: 449:

No - the article as it stands now is a good stub. But for you to tell me that it shouldn't have been tagged as such when I originally tagged it is ridiculous.

4417:

You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated

4231:

There are two different words written and pronounced "compact", based on two different Latin words. One of them does have the meaning of contract or "pact".

3747:

An arbitration case regarding Betacommand (Δ) has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

2258:

Well, adding "Too much time is wasted pandering to trolls here. Not my cup of tea." after your comments on a user have been reverted is the most recent one.

1680: 332:

state the importance of this person "a pioneer of the history of science in the United States", a claim which has been reproduced in the Knowledge article.

3404:

No problem, chacun a son gout. I've been called everything under the sun during vandalism patrol and still that hit a nerve the size of the Panama Canal. --

3525: 3519: 2291:

general remark, not clarly aimed at any specific editor (it would be hard to indicate e.g. which editor is supposed to be Jerry Springer in that comment).

1372: 3763:

which resulted in his ban. The Committee shall present this plan to the community for review and comment prior to any modification of Betacommand's ban.

2723: 2158: 652: 617: 604: 3846:, so in my first (and mistaken) reading I interpreted that as the IP being the editor involved in two "painful articles", but it was North8000 instead. 2753: 2026:

and let other administrators decide. Do bear in mind that a sockpuppet block will prevent you from creating any new accounts under other names.

1835:

RefLinks and a lot of additional cleanup items. But yes I was reviewing them before saving, and have preformed over 8,200 such edits with this account.

1111:

In general, Knowledge has a very poor history of creating policies and guidelines related to civility, and has an even poorer history of enforcing them.

4166: 3138: 3131: 3106: 2791:. "the final demise of Buddhism in Eastern Iran and Afghanistan was caused by the rise of Islam and Arab invasions from the 7th century onwards." The 1413:

assume good faith that you were merely confused, and for the record, the poorly formatted reference had been added by someone other than me. Then you

3709:

you need to indicate that the section had been in the past collapsed or hatted, to allow readers to understand that it was collapsed, but now isn't.

2098:

Thanks for you opinion on village pump, I have updated the extension based on that, so that now it doesn't track people who don't want that anymore.

2631: 4556: 949:. Alas, I don't have much expertise in the area, but I investigated that article due to alleged manipulation from an irredentist and banned user. 1079:

and was reverted by a third editor. Not every bad example from a guideline belongs in a policy. That policy has in fact enough of those already.

3871: 3787:

Thanks for your note. I'm pretty confident in the identifications I made. But if you see any that look weak feel free to remove them for now.

2641: 2616: 1799:: "While such contributions are not usually considered to constitute use of a bot, if there is any doubt, you should make an approval request." 1421:) The punishment and treatment of a criminal offender through a program of imprisonment, parole and probation <Department of Corrections: --> 160: 1993:

The essence of Knowledge is that's just a social club for script kiddies or IRC buddies to run roughshod over fools who try to contribute here

1417:

the enhanced citation claiming that it doesn't mention Department of Corrections, which actually it does. Quote from source: "correction 3. (

406:

significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Knowledge's notability guidelines."

4162: 4113:

If you're really bored, apparently my changes to that page have stirred up some controversy (after AGK removed my edits and I reverted him),

3189: 3145: 1544: 1473: 1451: 1337: 1292: 1226: 1208: 1144: 1098: 1084: 1039: 954: 879: 861: 846: 824: 808: 783: 732: 710: 586: 559: 489: 474: 440: 411: 380: 337: 4350:

is currently inactive as it has not been edited in at least a week. If the issues in the case have been resolved, please let us know on our

4156: 2305:

That comment, which is equivalent to saying "you guys collectively don't rise above the level of a Jerry Springer audience", is coming from

2058:

And please explain what you mean by "read postings before you cite them incorrectly". Accusations like that without diffs may be considered

1203:

following your request above, leaving only what I think are the on-topic parts of my posts. Let me know if anything left still bothers you.

4671: 4070:

Done & done. I've deactivated the tag but not removed it completely because you had already commented about it on the talk page there.

3552: 3533: 2440: 2434: 1527:; every idea published in Knowledge is a "ripoff" from someone else. So the only cause for concern is plagiarism of expression, which when 1061:

I'm surprised that a simple footnote, copied from WP:EQ would be so disputed, but I'll let you work it out with others on the talk page. --

311:

who is willingly to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, -

2481:. As you are either an involved party or have presented evidence in this case, your input is sollicited. For the Arbitration Committee -- 1873:

While I am not required to inform you, I am doing the kindness of letting you know that an issue that concerns you is being discussed at

521:

then article "Gunpowder" should link to "Schießpulver". But if you add some links to one article, some to other you just make confusion.

4152: 2627: 2554:

something in that section applies to UK practices. That section appears globally neutral to me; although I can see some US bias in the

2419: 2372: 999: 906: 4418: 46:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 2022:

I will investigate your use of multiple accounts, and if need be, I will not block them directly myself, but I will open a

1874: 1636: 264:

to Knowledge, thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a

4460:(DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are 920: 1988: 1540: 1469: 1447: 1333: 1288: 1222: 1204: 1140: 1094: 1080: 1035: 950: 875: 857: 842: 820: 779: 728: 706: 672: 555: 485: 470: 436: 407: 376: 333: 2653: 4667: 3879: 3277: 1743: 1739: 1732: 1251: 4159:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4268: 4243: 3806:

There may be larger problems which require outside input, but I suggest we address the more manageable ones locally first.

2846: 2767: 2119: 1605: 1426:

which beggars belief, namely that the source doesn't contain the exact sentence about many US states. Leaving aside that the

970: 764: 280:. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps: 4306:

Knowledge:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/11_February_2012/Muhammad-images#Finalizing_Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment.2FMuhammad_images

2642:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard#Richard Arthur Norton: Revisiting topic ban; Should it be removed or made indefinite?

2617:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard#Richard Arthur Norton: Revisiting topic ban; Should it be removed or made indefinite?

1439:

paragraph, the rest of which is less than obvious, but was surely well supported by the citation. Finally, you reverted my

1357:

Welcome to Knowledge. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you

4406: 4118: 3358:

Until now, I have been thinking you've been deliberately twisting my intent as a cheap rhetorical device, but when I read

2795:

who later ruled Eastern Iran (where most of the Buddhist centers were) were Sunni and did plenty of conversion themselves

2186: 1995:- in my opinion your various comments under your multiple identities exacerbate the very issues you complain about. 1619: 1614: 1588: 308: 88: 38: 2452:

Knowledge:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 26#"Christian terrorism" supercategory at Cat:Anti-abortion violence.

916: 3883: 1519:

are related, but not the same concept. Plagiarism means that the ideas or expression thereof are passed on as original.

1031: 180: 93: 4658:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2044:

Your post oozes good faith. Please check my user page before wasting others' time with your sock-puppet investigation.

1783:

Just a comment about your comments on the VPP, every single edit that I make I review before saving and its not a bot.

299:

This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Knowledge's

4663: 1263: 911: 3989:

page, I hope you don't mind. If you do, please feel as free to remove it as I was to "vandalize" Will's userpage. --

2936:

I didn't revert all your changes, just the commenting out :). I thought the other changes were just copy editing. --

2076:

I will retract the issue concerning SPI as it appears a name change was authorised just yesterday by a bureaucrat.

924: 3875: 2216:

That user has received multiple blocks and bans for disruption, and there's a current discussion to ban him on ANI.

4471: 1965: 1923: 871: 265: 2640:). The closing admin has asked for community input about whether to remove the topic ban or make it indefinite at 4335: 4264: 3286: 2020:

postings before you cite them incorrectly, and get the facts straight before you accuse the wrong people.

1757: 1431: 1379:. I would remind you also that the material to attached the citation to is obviously plagiarized from the source. 1187: 217: 103: 2615: 4201: 3381:

As an aside, I believe it is perfectly legitimate to discuss this question, though I can't see it being of any

3156: 2830:

If you read the source I linked for you, you'll see that you're still quite wrong. Buddhism in Iran ended with

2731: 2520: 2486: 2166: 1828: 834: 671:

I would also like to point out that I have been set up and then subjected to an unwarranted personal attack by

513:

That was user supervised bot edit. At first change 'wrong' links at de.wiki before undoing and complaining. If

187: 97: 3643:

Just to let you know I've opened a request with the Mediation cabal about the Muhammad images RFC. Please see

677:] You can see my reply there. Can someone please do something to stop this sort of unfair attack? Sincerely, 4015:

RFCs are a better use of everyone's time if they are first well formulated; Nathan's starting point is not.

3471:

Yes, many thanks for your good investigative work detailing similarities/differences between the accounts.

1427: 4564: 1892: 1750: 1659:

Thank you so much for helping me. Like removing a stumbling block from in front of a blind person, really.

4428: 4288: 4280: 4092: 4061: 4023: 3477: 3390: 3218: 3115: 3089: 1179: 1164: 261: 231: 74: 63: 3061: 4351: 3831: 3813: 3794: 3652: 3601: 3507: 3260: 3068: 3016: 2972: 2941: 2910: 2190: 316: 118: 110: 3596:

Aack, really? I had no idea I was close to his end of the spectrum. Something to work on, I suppose. --

1953:

Nonetheless, the community should have full trust in the renaming bureaucrat's judgement of renaming. →

1936: 3756:

community sanctions are superseded by the more straightforward remedies provided for in this decision.

2982:

Perhaps they were intended as purely hypothetical. You may want to raise that on the talk page there.

946: 4130: 3998: 3939: 3902: 3772: 3574: 3282: 2603: 2571: 1403: 1183: 1021: 1006: 989: 662: 627: 285: 277: 250: 208: 196: 164: 146: 130: 114: 1076:

Something less elaborate but identical in intent was added by the same editor a couple of days ago,

4659: 4364: 4356: 4197: 3724:

Ok, noted. I'm not sure what difference it makes since I preserved the note from the collapse tag.

3541: 3409: 3344: 3152: 2727: 2482: 2474: 2162: 1819: 1699: 1624: 1512: 1318: 1259: 682: 641: 126: 3667: 2967:

Yeah, that was an accident :o. I presumed you had missed it as I was so quick to revert it ;). --

2710:. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at 2546:

In the absence of explanation on the talk page, I'm puzzled by the globalize tag you added to the

2445:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive228#RFC close review: Category:Anti-abortion violence

2145:. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at 1430:

is about the US, the fact you contested doesn't even need a citation. Perhaps you should nominate

4599:

with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going

4560: 4238: 3714: 3331:

A notification that the Templates for Discussion discussion (oy, repetition) has been taken to a

3050: 2884: 2841: 2762: 2645: 2523: 2455: 2402: 2355: 2127: 1878: 1814: 1765: 1628: 803: 758: 579: 572: 536: 526: 454: 426: 396: 365: 239: 79: 70:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 4600: 1566: 1499: 1381: 1267: 695:

copied the above conversation here (with modifications) from his talk page on 29 September 2011.

2626:, in which a one-month topic ban on creating new articles and making page moves was imposed on 1639:. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. 125:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 4635: 4626: 4595: 4423: 4313: 4284: 4182: 4085: 4054: 4038:

as well. If you disagree with either listing, feel free to revert me. It's a wiki after all.

4016: 3966: 3675: 3482: 3472: 3386: 3214: 3110: 3084: 2676: 2351: 2081: 2034: 1679: 1645: 1532: 1160: 935: 435:

Give me a break. That was three days ago. I hope you're not objecting to the current article.

3339:

If anyone has an issue with me sending these out, do drop me a note on my talkpage. Regards,

2814: 2789: 539: 4655: 4639: 4614: 3986: 3826: 3808: 3789: 3648: 3597: 3502: 3439: 3255: 3232:. As for meeting you before this Muhammad images thing, I don't recall having the pleasure. 3012: 2968: 2937: 2906: 2796: 2749: 2649: 2540: 2527: 2459: 1796: 1769: 1664: 1536: 1218: 1034:. It should be ready in a few days. The information available in English is rather sketchy. 551: 542: 312: 4654:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2624:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive228#Richard Arthur Norton copyright violations

4552: 4275: 4212: 4122: 4071: 4039: 3990: 3934: 3917: 3897: 3847: 3768: 3725: 3686: 3622: 3570: 3556: 3458: 3312: 3233: 3178: 3171: 2997: 2983: 2954: 2923: 2859: 2817: 2799: 2687: 2599: 2585: 2567: 2386: 2317: 2277: 2245: 2217: 2103: 2063: 2059: 2045: 1613:

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the

1570: 1503: 1385: 1362: 1271: 1017: 1002: 985: 656: 621: 140: 4283:

and I'm happy to send you the logs so you can get an idea of what happened :). Regards,

1762:

Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 78#Template to request a discussion be closed

616:

This is a courtesy notice that I have brought certain of your edits under discussion at

554:

poor, so perhaps you should not be the one engaging in such tasks, bot-assisted or not.

4651: 4643: 4360: 4035: 3537: 3405: 3340: 3229: 2310: 2296: 2263: 2235: 2206: 2151:

Please add your evidence by November 17, 2011, which is when the evidence phase closes.

1960: 1944: 1918: 1858: 1836: 1804: 1784: 1719: 1687: 1520: 1314: 1284: 1119: 1066: 974: 915:? It is a project aimed to better organize and improve the quality and accuracy of the 724: 719:

Also, discussing you qualifications and reputation as a historian is not prohibited by

689: 678: 637: 546: 2716:

Please add your evidence by October 21, 2011, which is when the evidence phase closes.

2272:

Please explain how that statement of mine (on my user page) meets the definition of a

749:

I've finished uploading the picture in Wikimedia Commons. Sorry for the late reply. --

514: 4683: 4647: 4589: 4575: 4233: 4173:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3710: 3611: 3385:

use at the project, so would never have introduced it into that discussion myself. --

3046: 2836: 2757: 2664: 2197:, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please 2123: 2023: 2013: 1907:

This is only tangentially related, but could you create some redirects to your name (

1742:, which was snowball closed. A subsection of the discussion has been created. Titled 1693:

You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{user:chzz/tb}} template.

1376: 1358: 800: 750: 720: 522: 450: 422: 392: 361: 300: 273: 269: 235: 204: 200: 2813:

Arabic language, and in so doing they earned a significant niche in world history."

4464:, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to 4457: 4309: 4178: 4174: 3962: 3671: 3528:

is for people involved in the kangaroo court (ArbCom members and Clerks). You want

2669: 2273: 2077: 2030: 1998: 1908: 1641: 1600: 1440: 1247: 931: 84: 3605: 541:

for which there is no exact English Knowledge article match. Before the advent of

4604: 4144: 3449:"The revolution eats its children", but resurrections are possible in this one. 3435: 2504: 1660: 1329: 1255: 199:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

4327: 3824:

I don't see the comment, but I don't recall participating in any other FARs.

837:

says something that jibes with my common sense: that in controversial articles

4148: 3196: 2785: 2706:

An arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located at

2099: 1516: 357: 350: 31: 1911:

for instance), to assist those who don't know how to type the glottal stop? →

1313:

of closing the AfD discussion. Please read the message in the banner. Cheers.

599:

Hi! Thanks very much for your attempts to improve the references to my book,

2292: 2259: 2231: 2202: 2008: 2004: 1712: 1115: 1062: 518: 506: 3759:

Betacommand is banned from Knowledge for a period of no less than one year.

2550:

section of subject article. Your edit summary included a comment that you

1955: 1940: 1913: 1875:

Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)#Banning non-language character usernames

1854: 1800: 1764:. I have posed several questions there and am interested in your thoughts. 17: 4581: 1531:

constitutes copyright violation. A simple sentence, like the one with the

1058:

Thanks for clarifying what's going on with your comment on the talk page.

2792: 2781: 1850:

And some of the examples provided for you have been less than convincing

179:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

4675: 4620: 4568: 4434: 4368: 4317: 4292: 4249: 4220: 4205: 4186: 4133: 4096: 4079: 4065: 4047: 4027: 4001: 3971: 3946: 3925: 3909: 3855: 3837: 3819: 3800: 3777: 3733: 3718: 3694: 3679: 3656: 3630: 3579: 3564: 3545: 3513: 3487: 3466: 3443: 3413: 3394: 3348: 3320: 3290: 3266: 3241: 3222: 3199: 3185: 3160: 3120: 3095: 3054: 3020: 3005: 2991: 2976: 2962: 2945: 2931: 2914: 2892: 2867: 2852: 2825: 2807: 2773: 2735: 2695: 2680: 2607: 2593: 2575: 2531: 2490: 2463: 2450:

I am notifying all editors who participated in these two discussions or

2425: 2394: 2378: 2325: 2300: 2285: 2267: 2253: 2239: 2225: 2210: 2170: 2131: 2107: 2085: 2071: 2053: 2038: 1972: 1948: 1930: 1901: 1862: 1841: 1830: 1808: 1789: 1773: 1726: 1668: 1649: 1574: 1548: 1507: 1477: 1455: 1389: 1341: 1322: 1296: 1275: 1230: 1212: 1191: 1167: 1148: 1123: 1102: 1088: 1070: 1043: 1025: 1010: 993: 958: 939: 883: 865: 850: 828: 813: 787: 772: 736: 714: 563: 530: 493: 478: 458: 444: 430: 415: 400: 384: 369: 341: 320: 243: 154: 4382: 2559: 1740:

Knowledge:Village pump (policy)#Standard of review for non admin closes

841:

changes (rather than incremental ones) are more likely to be reverted.

723:. In the absurd case that it were so, it would be impossible to follow 4580: 1093:

And guess what: I violated the guideline by calling its examples bad!

901:

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in ancient

2831: 2309:. Repeatedly offensive behavior from a long-term Knowledge user that 2141:

An arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located at

4456:. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in 1468:

I can't ever do anything that meets your high standards, it seems.

998:

I would be happy If you proposed a new title for the article. Here:

535:

The de wiki link is not wrong. In modern German Schießpulver means

4555:, you might be interested in a discussion that is taking place at 4470: 3685:

Nemo told me on my meta talk page that RfCs are not translated...

2784:

were Zoroastrians and didn't tolerate Buddhism, then the came the

1369:

to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

902: 705:

I have replied on the noticeboard and on the article's talk page.

607:

so you can see what the problem is and avoid doing it in future.

356:

What was your rationale for removing the speedy deletion tag from

122: 4642:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

4510:: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August 4344:

Knowledge:Mediation Cabal/Cases/11 February 2012/Muhammad-images

268:

tag from a page you created yourself. Because Knowledge policy

4603:, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. 2469:

Questions to the parties on the Betacommand 3 arbitration case

26: 4551:

Hi, as someone who has contributed to discussion of the page

4338:

case that you are involved in, or have some connection with:

3109:

and I thought you would be interested. Thanks for your time.

923:

expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more

4381: 4326: 3192:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3170: 3148:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3130: 2720:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Muhammad images/Workshop

2712:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Muhammad images/Evidence

2454:

to ensure all editors are aware of the reopened discussion.

1678: 894: 589:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

571: 209:

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

169: 1361:

while interacting with other editors, which you did not on

2155:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Betacommand 3/Workshop

2147:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Betacommand 3/Evidence

1983:

Your comments at Wikmedia and other development projects

1173:

talk page guidelines on the talk page guidelines talk page

4524:

Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard

2581:

I think my edit summary contained sufficient explanation

2441:

Category talk:Anti-abortion violence#RFC on supercategory

2435:

Category talk:Anti-abortion violence#RFC on supercategory

1606:

Knowledge:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding

653:

Knowledge:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#User:John Hill

618:

Knowledge:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#User:John Hill

605:

Knowledge:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#User:John Hill

4271:, where some additional thoughts are already posted :). 2519:

Thanks for your positive and neutral contributions here

221:

to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for

4516:: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate 4412:

Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.

4334:

Dear ASCIIn2Bme: Hello, this is to let you know that a

4147:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 4013: 3844: 3706: 3499: 3359: 3309: 3305: 3301: 3297: 3209: 2951: 2746: 2582: 2314: 1851: 1466: 1464: 1446:

as "vandalism". You're exhibiting a lot of good faith.

1444: 1423: 1414: 1410: 1396: 1310: 1201: 1198: 1077: 978: 727:

as the content in this case is sourced from your book.

694: 290: 4504:: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums 3298:

2nd chunk of this with "Making shit up", "bassakwards"

2385:

know if that's the result of further editing or what.

1635:

You have received this notice because your name is on

4274:

In addition, on Tuesday 13th March, we're holding an

1000:

Talk:Allied_Intervention_in_Hungary#Misuse_of_sources

945:

I suppose you've sent me this because of my edits at

874:; it might take me a lifetime to get there though... 3670:, after all, that is part of what Meta is for :) -- 3144:

Message added 03:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC). You can

1283:

This is a fake warning with no diff. I've removed a

1250:

from articles, or remove other people's comments in

272:

the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an

4588:An article that you have been involved in editing, 3362:it occurred to me you are sincere in your belief. 3045:Thank you for the heads up I am correcting it now. 2708:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Muhammad images

1525:

WP:Knowledge is not a publisher of original thought

1262:. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please 927:. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards! 469:Anyway, I've added more references to the article. 207:, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please 133:, or ask your question on this page and then place 4498:: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey 4121:, if you'd like to add something to the story. -- 2905:Feel free to revert me at the end of the case. -- 2718:You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, 2153:You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, 1997:You have already been requested to adopt some 794:Dear lord, please learn to use the preview button. 360:? Where is there any indication of significance? 4634:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 3741:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Betacommand 3 2143:Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Betacommand 3 1738:Hi Have mörser, will travel. You participated in 3530:Knowledge talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard 3434:Happy editing to you, see you around the wiki. 2201:and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. 2686:Poor Jesus, if only he could read Knowledge... 1597: 375:It's included in many travel guides for Korea. 276:has replaced the deletion tag you removed from 177: 4299:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Muhammad images 2722:. For a guide to the arbitration process, see 2157:. For a guide to the arbitration process, see 1686:Hello, ASCIIn2Bme. You have new messages at 1197:I see you have redacted some of your comments 421:significance and did not have any references. 201:section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion 3177:Hello, ASCIIn2Bme. You have new messages at 3137:Hello, ASCIIn2Bme. You have new messages at 2313:? Can't be happening except in a Kafka novel 597: 578:Hello, ASCIIn2Bme. You have new messages at 8: 4695:Wikipedians who opt out of template messages 4448:: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1) 3304:are on the same level of discourse as Fae's 3272:Outside view by ASCIIn2Bme and RFC talk page 1744:Knowledge:Village pump (policy)#Non-AfD NACs 1733:Knowledge:Village pump (policy)#Non-AfD NACs 4690:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery 3526:Knowledge:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard 3520:Knowledge:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard 2120:Knowledge talk:Stub/Archive 15#Minimum size 1935:The problem is there's a different SUL for 1760:, which were created after a discussion at 1373:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Corrections 1266:at the respective page instead. Thank you. 1258:. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create 1246:Welcome to Knowledge. Please do not remove 2724:Knowledge:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration 2159:Knowledge:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration 292:Click here to contest this speedy deletion 288:. Once there, select the button that says 109:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 3139:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Disambiguation 2502: 969:"I'm concerned about what is going on at 2858:may easily take part in the discussion. 778:Thank you! Don't worry about the delay. 4486:: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem. 3639:Mediation about the Muhammad images RFC 181:the guide to writing your first article 137:before the question. Again, welcome! 42:. ASCIIn2Bme has not edited Knowledge 1797:WP:BOTPOL#Assisted editing guidelines 1489:According to Black's Law Dictionary, 675:on the Editing Talk:Li(unit) page at 62:Hello, Have mörser, will travel, and 7: 3615: 3553:Knowledge talk:Arbitration Committee 3534:Knowledge talk:Arbitration Committee 3450: 2788:and after them the Islamic conquest 4475:Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow 3985:award (which was excellent btw) to 3870:I have made subsequent comments at 3705:If you make changes to archives as 2622:Hi ASCIIn2Bme. You participated in 1114:Glad to see some new eyes on it! -- 234:the page or email a copy to you. 186:You may want to consider using the 4557:Influences on the Spanish language 4109:If you have 2 cents to throw in... 3666:You may wish to avail yourself of 3230:Which are not that hard to produce 1637:Knowledge:Feedback request service 1309:In case you missed it an admin is 1032:Czechoslovak-Hungarian War of 1919 1030:I am working on an article on the 651:and I have written this reply at: 230:to request that the administrator 25: 4660:review the candidates' statements 4531:Read the entire first edition of 3767:For the Arbitration Committee, -- 2996:Actually, I've done that myself. 2726:. For the Arbitration Committee, 2311:is enabled by some administrators 2161:. For the Arbitration Committee, 919:related to these topics. We need 872:Bradspeak diff-friendly discourse 870:I will however strive toward the 644:) 22:59, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 611:"Your edits are under discussion" 39:This user may have left Knowledge 4452:Welcome to the first edition of 4377: 4139:Disambiguation link notification 4084:Thank you-- much appreciated !! 3616: 3451: 3302:comments on presumed motivations 3060: 2702:Muhammad images arbitration case 2503: 2180: 2137:Notification of arbitration case 2118:contribute to the discussion at 1352: 1241: 685:) 01:06, 29 September 2011 (UTC) 667:13:44, 28 September 2011 (UTC): 256: 215:deleted. You can also visit the 94:How to create your first article 30: 3498:Thanks - I think I've fixed it. 3278:Talk:Karrine Steffans/Archive 2 2443:was reopened after a review at 1599:Remember that RFCs are part of 4666:. For the Election committee, 4636:Arbitration Committee election 4627:ArbCom elections are now open! 4543:18:45, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 3276:Just a small question: W.r.t. 2898:Images manual of style changes 2663:Haha, seriously? Please read 2628:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 1287:notice, which I'm allowed to. 971:Allied Intervention in Hungary 737:18:17, 29 September 2011 (UTC) 715:17:04, 29 September 2011 (UTC) 632:13:44, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 564:12:38, 22 September 2011 (UTC) 531:12:02, 22 September 2011 (UTC) 494:02:04, 16 September 2011 (UTC) 479:02:01, 16 September 2011 (UTC) 459:18:13, 19 September 2011 (UTC) 445:18:11, 19 September 2011 (UTC) 431:18:07, 19 September 2011 (UTC) 416:01:59, 16 September 2011 (UTC) 401:01:32, 16 September 2011 (UTC) 385:01:30, 16 September 2011 (UTC) 370:01:27, 16 September 2011 (UTC) 342:02:18, 15 September 2011 (UTC) 321:02:14, 15 September 2011 (UTC) 244:02:11, 15 September 2011 (UTC) 1: 4676:16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 4187:10:45, 29 February 2012 (UTC) 4143:Hi. When you recently edited 4134:20:08, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 4097:18:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 4080:18:30, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 4066:18:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 4048:18:13, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 4028:18:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 4002:09:25, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 3972:23:48, 25 February 2012 (UTC) 3947:00:35, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3926:00:09, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3910:21:35, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 3884:18:10, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 3856:13:57, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 3838:13:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 3820:12:57, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 3801:12:19, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 3778:01:47, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 3734:00:07, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 3719:00:03, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 3695:19:14, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 3680:19:09, 13 February 2012 (UTC) 3657:14:32, 11 February 2012 (UTC) 3631:16:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 3606:16:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 3580:16:38, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 3565:02:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 3546:02:26, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 3055:19:34, 27 December 2011 (UTC) 3021:10:09, 29 December 2011 (UTC) 3006:00:15, 29 December 2011 (UTC) 2992:00:09, 29 December 2011 (UTC) 2977:15:19, 27 December 2011 (UTC) 2963:09:51, 27 December 2011 (UTC) 2946:23:10, 26 December 2011 (UTC) 2932:23:07, 26 December 2011 (UTC) 2915:23:03, 26 December 2011 (UTC) 2893:15:13, 25 December 2011 (UTC) 2868:22:00, 25 December 2011 (UTC) 2853:22:27, 24 December 2011 (UTC) 2826:19:55, 24 December 2011 (UTC) 2808:19:55, 24 December 2011 (UTC) 2774:16:52, 24 December 2011 (UTC) 2736:15:09, 21 December 2011 (UTC) 2696:11:15, 18 December 2011 (UTC) 2681:09:44, 18 December 2011 (UTC) 2654:08:55, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 2608:02:06, 30 November 2011 (UTC) 2594:21:53, 29 November 2011 (UTC) 2576:19:16, 29 November 2011 (UTC) 2532:12:55, 14 November 2011 (UTC) 2189:other editors, as you did at 1989:User:Have mörser, will travel 1620:Knowledge talk:Citing sources 1589:Knowledge talk:Citing sources 1252:Articles for deletion debates 1248:Articles for deletion notices 1054:Knowledge:No personal attacks 601:Through the Jade Gate to Rome 218:the page's talk page directly 155:18:17, 8 September 2011 (UTC) 75:The five pillars of Knowledge 4569:18:51, 7 December 2012 (UTC) 4323:Mediation Cabal: Case update 3753:existing community sanctions 3514:10:20, 7 February 2012 (UTC) 3488:09:24, 4 February 2012 (UTC) 3467:16:52, 4 February 2012 (UTC) 3444:07:43, 4 February 2012 (UTC) 3414:02:44, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 3395:14:06, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 3378:on this as it is the truth. 3349:10:26, 28 January 2012 (UTC) 3321:07:45, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 3291:23:01, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 3267:07:49, 28 January 2012 (UTC) 3242:14:10, 25 January 2012 (UTC) 3223:13:28, 25 January 2012 (UTC) 3200:15:59, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 3186:15:59, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 3161:03:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 3121:01:18, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 2491:13:46, 9 November 2011 (UTC) 2464:04:00, 6 November 2011 (UTC) 2426:16:30, 4 November 2011 (UTC) 2395:16:19, 4 November 2011 (UTC) 2379:16:16, 4 November 2011 (UTC) 2326:10:44, 4 November 2011 (UTC) 2301:10:41, 4 November 2011 (UTC) 2286:10:29, 4 November 2011 (UTC) 2268:10:07, 4 November 2011 (UTC) 2254:10:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC) 2240:10:01, 4 November 2011 (UTC) 2226:09:58, 4 November 2011 (UTC) 2211:09:57, 4 November 2011 (UTC) 2171:00:33, 3 November 2011 (UTC) 2132:19:27, 1 November 2011 (UTC) 2108:19:15, 31 October 2011 (UTC) 2086:14:16, 30 October 2011 (UTC) 2072:13:54, 30 October 2011 (UTC) 2054:13:39, 30 October 2011 (UTC) 2039:13:35, 30 October 2011 (UTC) 2016:. In addition, you should 1973:08:10, 27 October 2011 (UTC) 1949:06:41, 27 October 2011 (UTC) 1931:01:44, 27 October 2011 (UTC) 1902:08:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC) 1863:04:49, 26 October 2011 (UTC) 1842:20:55, 25 October 2011 (UTC) 1831:20:47, 25 October 2011 (UTC) 1809:19:54, 25 October 2011 (UTC) 1790:19:27, 25 October 2011 (UTC) 1774:06:05, 25 October 2011 (UTC) 1727:04:55, 25 October 2011 (UTC) 1669:05:45, 24 October 2011 (UTC) 1650:02:15, 22 October 2011 (UTC) 1575:03:42, 21 October 2011 (UTC) 1549:00:47, 21 October 2011 (UTC) 1508:23:31, 20 October 2011 (UTC) 1478:23:13, 20 October 2011 (UTC) 1456:22:47, 20 October 2011 (UTC) 1390:18:26, 20 October 2011 (UTC) 1342:21:12, 19 October 2011 (UTC) 1323:20:46, 19 October 2011 (UTC) 1297:19:52, 19 October 2011 (UTC) 1276:19:49, 19 October 2011 (UTC) 1231:10:39, 10 October 2011 (UTC) 1213:10:27, 10 October 2011 (UTC) 1192:08:01, 10 October 2011 (UTC) 884:16:26, 10 October 2011 (UTC) 301:criteria for speedy deletion 205:criteria for speedy deletion 190:to help you create articles. 66:to Knowledge! Thank you for 4662:and submit your choices on 3647:if you want to comment. -- 3096:10:47, 9 January 2012 (UTC) 3072:at Eraserhead1's talk page. 2348:"please don't modify a RfC" 1987:Hello ASCIIn2Bme. You are 1758:Category:Requests for Close 1200:, and I have done the same 1168:22:26, 9 October 2011 (UTC) 1149:18:01, 7 October 2011 (UTC) 1124:18:16, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 1103:17:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 1089:16:52, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 1071:16:47, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 1044:05:45, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 1026:17:30, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 1011:16:21, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 994:16:19, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 959:06:24, 5 October 2011 (UTC) 940:20:59, 4 October 2011 (UTC) 866:18:21, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 851:17:00, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 829:16:39, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 814:11:13, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 788:04:33, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 773:04:32, 2 October 2011 (UTC) 284:Go to the page by clicking 228:one of these administrators 4711: 4668:MediaWiki message delivery 4621:19:39, 7 August 2014 (UTC) 4318:14:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 2176:No personal attacks please 1399:the reference which had a 4522:: It's time to close the 4508:DR Noticeboard comparison 4492:: The most recent DR data 4435:11:14, 5 April 2012 (UTC) 4374:Dispute resolution survey 4369:18:07, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 4293:00:43, 9 March 2012 (UTC) 4250:03:58, 4 March 2012 (UTC) 4221:20:44, 3 March 2012 (UTC) 4206:19:06, 3 March 2012 (UTC) 3555:. Thanks for the advice. 2509: 2400:and fixed it). Best, Rob 1432:Department of Corrections 1409:tag as "non-citation". I 195:A tag has been placed on 4216: 4196:Well, of course he was. 4075: 4043: 3977:In lieu of a barnstar... 3930:agreed. best wishes. — 3921: 3851: 3729: 3690: 3626: 3560: 3462: 3316: 3237: 3105:I just recently started 3001: 2987: 2958: 2927: 2863: 2821: 2803: 2691: 2589: 2479:questions to the parties 2390: 2346:Hi ASCII, when you said 2321: 2281: 2249: 2221: 2067: 2049: 1813:He is clearly using the 1541:Have mörser, will travel 1470:Have mörser, will travel 1448:Have mörser, will travel 1334:Have mörser, will travel 1289:Have mörser, will travel 1223:Have mörser, will travel 1205:Have mörser, will travel 1141:Have mörser, will travel 1095:Have mörser, will travel 1081:Have mörser, will travel 1036:Have mörser, will travel 951:Have mörser, will travel 876:Have mörser, will travel 858:Have mörser, will travel 843:Have mörser, will travel 835:Knowledge:Editing policy 821:Have mörser, will travel 780:Have mörser, will travel 729:Have mörser, will travel 707:Have mörser, will travel 673:Have mörser, will travel 556:Have mörser, will travel 517:links to articles about 486:Have mörser, will travel 471:Have mörser, will travel 437:Have mörser, will travel 408:Have mörser, will travel 377:Have mörser, will travel 334:Have mörser, will travel 4547:Edits in broken English 4227:Compact, pact, contract 3587: 3107:Wikiproject Cooperation 3101:Wikiproject Cooperation 2950:Well, you did at first 2024:Sockpupet investigation 89:How to develop articles 4585: 4476: 4386: 4331: 4255:Page Triage newsletter 3668:m:Translation requests 3175: 3135: 1684: 1610: 1428:Black's Law Dictionary 899: 700: 576: 192: 174: 4640:Arbitration Committee 4584: 4574:Merge discussion for 4526:. Agree or disagree? 4474: 4391:Dispute Resolution – 4385: 4330: 3645:the mediation request 3174: 3134: 2513:The Original Barnstar 2191:User talk:Jimbo Wales 1683:You have new messages 1682: 1365:. Take a look at the 898: 575: 173: 4355:Xavexgoem, on their 4175:opt-out instructions 3876:The Devil's Advocate 3874:about a topic ban.-- 3662:Translation requests 2584:for adding the tag. 2473:Drafting arbitrator 1535:("corrections") and 905:. Would you like to 594:Just to let you know 580:Hugo.arg's talk page 278:John Maxson Stillman 251:John Maxson Stillman 197:John Maxson Stillman 165:John Maxson Stillman 4644:arbitration process 4157:fix with Dab solver 3701:Changes to archives 2548:Chemical variations 2475:User:Kirill Lokshin 1700:File:Ico specie.png 1615:request for comment 1513:Copyright violation 947:Upper Trajan's Wall 249:Removing Speedy at 127:Knowledge:Questions 4656:arbitration policy 4586: 4477: 4458:dispute resolution 4387: 4332: 4165:• Join us at the 3494:Misplaced comment? 3190:remove this notice 3176: 3146:remove this notice 3136: 2745:Hi ASCIIn2Bme, re 1685: 1601:Dispute Resolution 1595:Responding to RFCs 1587:Please comment on 1254:, as you did with 900: 587:remove this notice 577: 537:firearm propellant 309:highly active user 175: 85:How to edit a page 68:your contributions 4619: 4608: 4514:Discussion update 4502:Activity analysis 4479:In this issue: 4442: 4441: 4437: 4170: 4132: 4007:Please reconsider 4000: 3945: 3908: 3872:the AN discussion 3551:I've moved it to 3419:AN/BarkingMoon/CU 3179:Jayjg's talk page 2659:re: December 2011 2537: 2536: 2424: 2423: 2413: 2410: 2406: 2377: 2376: 2366: 2363: 2359: 2014:personal attacks 1937:User:Glottal stop 1899: 1746:, it pertains to 1725: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1627:position, and is 1359:assume good faith 912:WikiProject Dacia 890:WikiProject Dacia 811: 771: 745:About Seoul Land. 697: 543:smokeless powders 274:automated program 151: 117:your messages on 50: 49: 16:(Redirected from 4702: 4610: 4606: 4541:The Olive Branch 4533:The Olive Branch 4454:The Olive Branch 4446:The Olive Branch 4433: 4431: 4426: 4416: 4378: 4246: 4241: 4236: 4160: 4153:check to confirm 4129: 4126: 4089: 4058: 4020: 3997: 3994: 3970: 3944: 3942: 3931: 3907: 3905: 3894: 3834: 3829: 3816: 3811: 3797: 3792: 3775: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3577: 3536:or something. -- 3510: 3505: 3485: 3480: 3475: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3263: 3258: 3193: 3149: 3118: 3113: 3094: 3092: 3087: 3073: 3071: 3064: 2890: 2887: 2849: 2844: 2839: 2770: 2765: 2760: 2750:Buddhism in Iran 2741:Buddhism in Iran 2672: 2541:Smokeless powder 2522:.With Respect -- 2507: 2500: 2499: 2477:has posted some 2416: 2415: 2408: 2404: 2401: 2369: 2368: 2361: 2357: 2354: 2184: 2183: 1971: 1968: 1963: 1958: 1929: 1926: 1921: 1916: 1898: 1893: 1890: 1826: 1755: 1749: 1724: 1722: 1716: 1710: 1707: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1688:Chzz's talk page 1493:is defined as... 1424:reason to revert 1408: 1402: 1356: 1355: 1245: 1244: 807: 770: 767: 761: 755: 753: 693: 692: 665: 659: 630: 624: 590: 295: 260: 259: 172: 152: 149: 145: 143: 136: 119:discussion pages 44:since March 2012 34: 27: 21: 4710: 4709: 4705: 4704: 4703: 4701: 4700: 4699: 4680: 4679: 4664:the voting page 4630: 4594:proposed for a 4579: 4549: 4537: 4450: 4429: 4424: 4422: 4409:to participate. 4396: 4376: 4336:Mediation Cabal 4325: 4302: 4265:New Page Triage 4257: 4244: 4239: 4234: 4229: 4194: 4167:DPL WikiProject 4141: 4124: 4111: 4087: 4056: 4018: 4009: 3992: 3979: 3960: 3957: 3940: 3932: 3903: 3895: 3891: 3868: 3832: 3827: 3814: 3809: 3795: 3790: 3785: 3773: 3745: 3703: 3664: 3641: 3617: 3590: 3575: 3523: 3508: 3503: 3496: 3483: 3478: 3473: 3452: 3421: 3402: 3356: 3333:deletion review 3329: 3283:Aaron Brenneman 3274: 3261: 3256: 3250: 3207: 3194: 3183: 3168: 3150: 3143: 3128: 3116: 3111: 3103: 3090: 3085: 3083: 3079: 3074: 3066: 3059: 3043: 2900: 2888: 2885: 2880: 2847: 2842: 2837: 2768: 2763: 2758: 2743: 2728:Alexandr Dmitri 2704: 2670: 2661: 2620: 2562:article in the 2544: 2498: 2483:Alexandr Dmitri 2471: 2438: 2422: 2375: 2344: 2181: 2178: 2163:Alexandr Dmitri 2139: 2115: 2096: 2078:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 2031:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง 1985: 1966: 1961: 1956: 1954: 1924: 1919: 1914: 1912: 1894: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1871: 1839: 1820: 1787: 1781: 1753: 1747: 1736: 1720: 1714: 1711: 1708: 1692: 1676: 1657: 1611: 1596: 1592: 1406: 1400: 1363:User talk:JeffJ 1353: 1350: 1307: 1242: 1239: 1184:Unscintillating 1180:WP:BATTLEGROUND 1175: 1156: 1136: 1056: 967: 928: 892: 812: 796: 765: 759: 756: 751: 747: 687: 663: 657: 628: 622: 596: 591: 584: 515:de:Schießpulver 510: 354: 289: 266:speedy deletion 257: 254: 193: 170: 168: 161:Speedy deletion 147: 141: 139: 134: 104:Manual of Style 55: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 4708: 4706: 4698: 4697: 4692: 4682: 4681: 4633: 4629: 4624: 4578: 4572: 4548: 4545: 4529: 4528: 4527: 4517: 4511: 4505: 4499: 4496:Survey results 4493: 4487: 4449: 4443: 4440: 4439: 4414: 4411: 4398: 4389: 4375: 4372: 4348: 4347: 4324: 4321: 4301: 4296: 4259:Hey there :). 4256: 4253: 4228: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4193: 4190: 4140: 4137: 4110: 4107: 4106: 4105: 4104: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4008: 4005: 3978: 3975: 3956: 3953: 3952: 3951: 3950: 3949: 3890: 3887: 3867: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3784: 3781: 3765: 3764: 3760: 3757: 3744: 3738: 3737: 3736: 3702: 3699: 3698: 3697: 3663: 3660: 3640: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3589: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3522: 3517: 3495: 3492: 3491: 3490: 3469: 3420: 3417: 3401: 3398: 3355: 3352: 3328: 3325: 3324: 3323: 3281: 3273: 3270: 3249: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3206: 3203: 3184:Message added 3182: 3169: 3167: 3164: 3153:Yone Fernandes 3142: 3129: 3127: 3124: 3102: 3099: 3078: 3075: 3058: 3042: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 2899: 2896: 2879: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2810: 2742: 2739: 2703: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2667:. Jesus wept. 2660: 2657: 2619: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2543: 2538: 2535: 2534: 2516: 2515: 2510: 2508: 2497: 2494: 2470: 2467: 2437: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2418: 2371: 2343: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2288: 2185:Please do not 2177: 2174: 2138: 2135: 2114: 2111: 2095: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2056: 2027: 2021: 2002: 1996: 1984: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1885: 1881: 1870: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1838: 1823:Alpha_Quadrant 1786: 1780: 1777: 1735: 1730: 1691: 1677: 1675: 1672: 1656: 1653: 1594: 1593: 1591: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1521:The Pirate Bay 1495:quote, unquote 1481: 1480: 1459: 1458: 1349: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1311:in the process 1306: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1238: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1215: 1174: 1171: 1155: 1152: 1135: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1112: 1109: 1055: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1013: 966: 963: 962: 961: 893: 891: 888: 887: 886: 868: 853: 831: 806: 795: 792: 791: 790: 746: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 717: 699: 698: 690:User:John Hill 686: 634: 633: 613: 612: 595: 592: 583: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 547:nitrocellulose 509: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 499: 498: 497: 496: 481: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 353: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 305: 304: 297: 270:does not allow 253: 247: 188:Article Wizard 176: 167: 163:nomination of 158: 107: 106: 101: 98:Article Wizard 91: 82: 77: 54: 51: 48: 47: 35: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4707: 4696: 4693: 4691: 4688: 4687: 4685: 4678: 4677: 4673: 4669: 4665: 4661: 4657: 4653: 4649: 4645: 4641: 4637: 4628: 4625: 4623: 4622: 4618: 4617: 4613: 4609: 4602: 4598: 4597: 4591: 4583: 4577: 4573: 4571: 4570: 4566: 4562: 4561:Sminthopsis84 4558: 4554: 4546: 4544: 4542: 4536: 4534: 4525: 4521: 4518: 4515: 4512: 4509: 4506: 4503: 4500: 4497: 4494: 4491: 4488: 4485: 4482: 4481: 4480: 4473: 4469: 4467: 4463: 4459: 4455: 4447: 4444: 4438: 4436: 4432: 4427: 4420: 4419:research page 4413: 4410: 4408: 4405:Please click 4402: 4397: 4395: 4394: 4393:Survey Invite 4384: 4380: 4379: 4373: 4371: 4370: 4366: 4362: 4358: 4353: 4346: 4345: 4341: 4340: 4339: 4337: 4329: 4322: 4320: 4319: 4315: 4311: 4307: 4300: 4297: 4295: 4294: 4290: 4286: 4282: 4277: 4272: 4270: 4266: 4260: 4254: 4252: 4251: 4248: 4247: 4242: 4237: 4226: 4222: 4218: 4214: 4210: 4209: 4208: 4207: 4204: 4203: 4199: 4191: 4189: 4188: 4184: 4180: 4176: 4171: 4168: 4164: 4158: 4154: 4150: 4146: 4138: 4136: 4135: 4131: 4128: 4120: 4116: 4108: 4098: 4094: 4090: 4083: 4082: 4081: 4077: 4073: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4063: 4059: 4051: 4050: 4049: 4045: 4041: 4037: 4032: 4031: 4030: 4029: 4025: 4021: 4014: 4006: 4004: 4003: 3999: 3996: 3988: 3984: 3981:I added your 3976: 3974: 3973: 3968: 3964: 3954: 3948: 3943: 3937: 3936: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3923: 3919: 3914: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3906: 3900: 3899: 3888: 3886: 3885: 3881: 3877: 3873: 3865: 3857: 3853: 3849: 3845: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3836: 3835: 3830: 3823: 3822: 3821: 3818: 3817: 3812: 3805: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3799: 3798: 3793: 3782: 3780: 3779: 3776: 3770: 3761: 3758: 3754: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3742: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3727: 3723: 3722: 3721: 3720: 3716: 3712: 3708: 3700: 3696: 3692: 3688: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3677: 3673: 3669: 3661: 3659: 3658: 3654: 3650: 3646: 3638: 3632: 3628: 3624: 3613: 3612:User:Bishonen 3609: 3608: 3607: 3603: 3599: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3581: 3578: 3572: 3569:Looks good -- 3568: 3567: 3566: 3562: 3558: 3554: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3547: 3543: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3521: 3518: 3516: 3515: 3512: 3511: 3506: 3500: 3493: 3489: 3486: 3481: 3476: 3470: 3468: 3464: 3460: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3432: 3428: 3424: 3423:Hello there! 3418: 3416: 3415: 3411: 3407: 3399: 3397: 3396: 3392: 3388: 3384: 3379: 3375: 3371: 3367: 3363: 3361: 3354:Clarification 3353: 3351: 3350: 3346: 3342: 3337: 3334: 3326: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3310: 3307: 3303: 3299: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3279: 3271: 3269: 3268: 3265: 3264: 3259: 3247: 3243: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3220: 3216: 3211: 3210: 3204: 3202: 3201: 3198: 3191: 3187: 3180: 3173: 3165: 3163: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3147: 3140: 3133: 3125: 3123: 3122: 3119: 3114: 3108: 3100: 3098: 3097: 3093: 3088: 3076: 3070: 3069:a new message 3063: 3057: 3056: 3052: 3048: 3040: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2960: 2956: 2952: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2943: 2939: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2912: 2908: 2903: 2897: 2895: 2894: 2891: 2877: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2851: 2850: 2845: 2840: 2833: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2823: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2809: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2794: 2790: 2787: 2783: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2772: 2771: 2766: 2761: 2754: 2751: 2747: 2740: 2738: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2673: 2666: 2658: 2656: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2636: 2633: 2629: 2625: 2618: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2564:Manufacturing 2561: 2557: 2556:Manufacturing 2553: 2549: 2542: 2539: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2518: 2517: 2514: 2511: 2506: 2501: 2495: 2493: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2468: 2466: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2448: 2446: 2442: 2436: 2433: 2427: 2421: 2412: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2374: 2365: 2352: 2349: 2341: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2289: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2193:. Comment on 2192: 2188: 2175: 2173: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2136: 2134: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2112: 2110: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2093: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2025: 2019: 2015: 2010: 2006: 2000: 1994: 1990: 1982: 1974: 1969: 1964: 1959: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1927: 1922: 1917: 1910: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1900: 1897: 1891: 1889: 1876: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1849: 1843: 1840: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1829: 1827: 1825: 1824: 1816: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1788: 1778: 1776: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1752: 1751:Request close 1745: 1741: 1734: 1731: 1729: 1728: 1723: 1718: 1717: 1701: 1689: 1681: 1673: 1671: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1655:Sock Puppetry 1654: 1652: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1640: 1638: 1632: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1621: 1616: 1609: 1607: 1602: 1590: 1586: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1496: 1492: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1465: 1461: 1460: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1442: 1438: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1405: 1398: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1380: 1378: 1374: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1328:Ah, yes, the 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1304: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1199: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1172: 1170: 1169: 1166: 1162: 1154:Verifiability 1153: 1151: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1133: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1110: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1059: 1053: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1014: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1001: 997: 996: 995: 991: 987: 983: 982: 981: 979: 976: 972: 964: 960: 956: 952: 948: 944: 943: 942: 941: 937: 933: 926: 922: 918: 914: 913: 908: 904: 897: 889: 885: 881: 877: 873: 869: 867: 863: 859: 854: 852: 848: 844: 840: 836: 832: 830: 826: 822: 818: 817: 816: 815: 810: 805: 802: 793: 789: 785: 781: 777: 776: 775: 774: 768: 762: 754: 752:User:Bart0278 744: 738: 734: 730: 726: 722: 721:WP:NPA#WHATIS 718: 716: 712: 708: 704: 703: 702: 701: 696: 691: 684: 680: 676: 674: 670: 669: 668: 666: 660: 654: 650: 645: 643: 639: 631: 625: 619: 615: 614: 610: 609: 608: 606: 602: 593: 588: 581: 574: 565: 561: 557: 552: 548: 544: 540: 538: 534: 533: 532: 528: 524: 520: 516: 512: 511: 508: 505: 495: 491: 487: 482: 480: 476: 472: 468: 460: 456: 452: 448: 447: 446: 442: 438: 434: 433: 432: 428: 424: 419: 418: 417: 413: 409: 404: 403: 402: 398: 394: 390: 389: 388: 387: 386: 382: 378: 374: 373: 372: 371: 367: 363: 359: 352: 349: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 318: 314: 310: 302: 298: 294: 293: 287: 283: 282: 281: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 252: 248: 246: 245: 241: 237: 233: 229: 224: 220: 219: 212: 210: 206: 202: 198: 191: 189: 184: 182: 166: 162: 159: 157: 156: 153: 150: 144: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 112: 105: 102: 99: 95: 92: 90: 86: 83: 81: 78: 76: 73: 72: 71: 69: 65: 60: 59: 52: 45: 41: 40: 36: 33: 29: 28: 19: 4631: 4615: 4611: 4593: 4587: 4550: 4540: 4538: 4532: 4519: 4513: 4507: 4501: 4495: 4489: 4483: 4478: 4462:active in DR 4453: 4451: 4445: 4415: 4404: 4403: 4399: 4392: 4390: 4388: 4349: 4342: 4333: 4303: 4285:Okeyes (WMF) 4276:office hours 4273: 4261: 4258: 4232: 4230: 4200: 4195: 4172: 4142: 4112: 4010: 3983:Cabal of One 3982: 3980: 3958: 3933: 3896: 3892: 3869: 3825: 3807: 3788: 3786: 3766: 3746: 3704: 3665: 3642: 3591: 3524: 3501: 3497: 3433: 3429: 3425: 3422: 3403: 3387:Anthonyhcole 3382: 3380: 3376: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3357: 3338: 3330: 3275: 3254: 3251: 3215:Anthonyhcole 3212: 3208: 3195: 3151: 3104: 3080: 3077:Binding RFCs 3044: 2904: 2901: 2881: 2835: 2756: 2755:. Cheers, -- 2744: 2715: 2705: 2668: 2662: 2634: 2621: 2563: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2545: 2512: 2472: 2449: 2439: 2347: 2345: 2194: 2179: 2150: 2140: 2116: 2097: 2017: 1992: 1986: 1895: 1880: 1872: 1822: 1821: 1782: 1737: 1713: 1709: 1658: 1634: 1633: 1618: 1612: 1598: 1528: 1494: 1490: 1488: 1436: 1418: 1370: 1367:welcome page 1351: 1308: 1240: 1237:October 2011 1176: 1161:Slrubenstein 1157: 1137: 1060: 1057: 973:; basically 968: 929: 910: 838: 797: 748: 648: 646: 635: 600: 598: 519:en:Gunpowder 355: 329: 306: 291: 255: 222: 216: 213: 194: 185: 178: 138: 131:my talk page 129:, ask me on 108: 100:if you wish) 61: 57: 56: 43: 37: 4592:, has been 4590:Chevauchée 4576:Chevauchée 4308:. Thanks. 4281:my talkpage 4145:For Dummies 3866:AN comments 3828:Will Beback 3810:Will Beback 3791:Will Beback 3649:Eraserhead1 3598:Floquenbeam 3588:I'm crushed 3504:Will Beback 3257:Will Beback 3013:Eraserhead1 2969:Eraserhead1 2938:Eraserhead1 2907:Eraserhead1 2342:Question... 2316:, I guess. 1909:one of mine 1491:corrections 1443:warning as 1404:page needed 1330:small print 1256:Corrections 965:redirection 658:Orange Mike 623:Orange Mike 313:SDPatrolBot 135:{{help me}} 121:using four 96:(using the 18:User talk:ʔ 4684:Categories 4652:topic bans 4553:Almogavars 4484:Background 4359:. Thanks! 4213:ASCIIn2Bme 4211:Was what? 4177:. Thanks, 4149:BitTorrent 4072:ASCIIn2Bme 4040:ASCIIn2Bme 3918:ASCIIn2Bme 3848:ASCIIn2Bme 3769:Guerillero 3726:ASCIIn2Bme 3687:ASCIIn2Bme 3623:ASCIIn2Bme 3571:Guerillero 3557:ASCIIn2Bme 3459:ASCIIn2Bme 3313:ASCIIn2Bme 3234:ASCIIn2Bme 3188:. You can 2998:ASCIIn2Bme 2984:ASCIIn2Bme 2955:ASCIIn2Bme 2924:ASCIIn2Bme 2860:ASCIIn2Bme 2818:ASCIIn2Bme 2800:ASCIIn2Bme 2786:White Huns 2752:, notably 2688:ASCIIn2Bme 2600:Thewellman 2586:ASCIIn2Bme 2568:Thewellman 2387:ASCIIn2Bme 2318:ASCIIn2Bme 2278:ASCIIn2Bme 2246:ASCIIn2Bme 2218:ASCIIn2Bme 2122:. Thanks, 2064:ASCIIn2Bme 2046:ASCIIn2Bme 1999:good faith 1629:not a vote 1517:plagiarism 1395:First you 1018:Fakirbakir 1003:Fakirbakir 986:Fakirbakir 358:Seoul Land 351:Seoul Land 142:Acroterion 111:Wikipedian 4648:site bans 4466:this page 4361:MedcabBot 4357:talk page 4352:talk page 4198:Cool Hand 4161:Read the 4012:RFCing? 3538:MZMcBride 3406:NellieBly 3383:practical 3360:this post 3341:Ironholds 3248:RFC/U Fae 3067:You have 2244:What PA? 2199:stay cool 2009:MediaWiki 2005:WikiMedia 1869:VP Thread 1625:consensus 1529:extensive 1315:Griswaldo 1260:consensus 1219:WP:REDACT 679:John Hill 638:John Hill 507:Gunpowder 330:obviously 286:this link 113:! Please 4520:Proposal 4490:Research 4269:talkpage 4117:and now 3711:Fifelfoo 3166:Talkback 3126:Talkback 3047:Tivanir2 2816:Cheers. 2793:Samanids 2782:Sasanids 2638:contribs 2566:section. 2124:Aymatth2 1815:RefLinks 1419:usu. pl. 932:Codrin.B 917:articles 833:In fact 585:You can 523:Hugo.arg 451:Inks.LWC 423:Inks.LWC 393:Inks.LWC 362:Inks.LWC 236:Inks.LWC 226:contact 80:Tutorial 58:Welcome! 4535:--: --> 4310:Johnbod 4179:DPL bot 4088:Georgia 4057:Georgia 4036:WP:CENT 4019:Georgia 3963:Nuujinn 3774:My Talk 3576:My Talk 3400:Re. meh 3205:Re DIVA 3065:Hello. 2886:Ludwigs 2748:, note 2671:Lugnuts 2560:Cordite 2195:content 2060:uncivil 1888:anguard 1642:RFC bot 1533:subject 1415:removed 1397:removed 1371:On the 1285:WP:PROD 1264:comment 1108:past... 975:WP:SYNT 725:WP:NPOV 262:Welcome 64:welcome 53:Welcome 4638:. The 4616:ALAROB 4425:Steven 4192:Rlevse 3743:closed 3479:really 3436:Keegan 3197:Jayjg 3112:Silver 3086:Steven 3041:Thanks 2832:Ghazan 2665:WP:AGF 2646:Cunard 2524:Orartu 2456:Cunard 2187:attack 1766:Cunard 1661:Aharon 1537:object 1437:entire 1377:WP:AGF 925:images 232:userfy 223:speedy 148:(talk) 123:tildes 4612:alias 4607:ob C. 4596:merge 4430:Zhang 4127:fique 4086:Sandy 4055:Sandy 4017:Sandy 3995:fique 3987:WBb's 3955:RFC/U 3655:: --> 3306:reply 3117:seren 3091:Zhang 3019:: --> 2975:: --> 2944:: --> 2913:: --> 2552:doubt 2496:Award 2405:OBERT 2358:OBERT 2274:WP:PA 2113:Stubs 2100:Petrb 2094:Reply 1715:Chzz 1567:JeffJ 1500:JeffJ 1441:WP:EW 1382:JeffJ 1268:JeffJ 903:Dacia 839:large 804:Isaac 766:cont. 4672:talk 4601:here 4565:talk 4407:HERE 4365:talk 4314:talk 4289:talk 4217:talk 4202:Luke 4183:talk 4123:Mael 4119:here 4115:here 4093:Talk 4076:talk 4062:Talk 4044:talk 4024:Talk 3991:Mael 3967:talk 3935:Ched 3922:talk 3898:Ched 3880:talk 3852:talk 3833:talk 3815:talk 3796:talk 3783:Tags 3751:The 3730:talk 3715:talk 3707:here 3691:talk 3676:talk 3653:talk 3651:< 3627:talk 3602:talk 3561:talk 3542:talk 3509:talk 3463:talk 3440:talk 3410:talk 3391:talk 3345:talk 3317:talk 3287:talk 3262:talk 3238:talk 3219:talk 3157:talk 3051:talk 3017:talk 3015:< 3002:talk 2988:talk 2973:talk 2971:< 2959:talk 2942:talk 2940:< 2928:talk 2911:talk 2909:< 2864:talk 2822:talk 2804:talk 2732:talk 2692:talk 2677:talk 2650:talk 2632:talk 2604:talk 2590:talk 2572:talk 2528:talk 2487:talk 2460:talk 2409:FROM 2391:talk 2362:FROM 2350:here 2322:talk 2297:talk 2293:Fram 2282:talk 2264:talk 2260:Fram 2250:talk 2236:talk 2232:Fram 2222:talk 2207:talk 2203:Fram 2167:talk 2128:talk 2104:talk 2082:talk 2068:talk 2050:talk 2035:talk 2018:read 2007:and 2003:The 1945:talk 1896:Wha? 1884:ven 1859:talk 1805:talk 1770:talk 1756:and 1665:talk 1646:talk 1571:talk 1545:talk 1515:and 1504:talk 1474:talk 1452:talk 1386:talk 1338:talk 1319:talk 1293:talk 1272:talk 1227:talk 1209:talk 1188:talk 1165:Talk 1145:talk 1134:Note 1120:talk 1116:Ronz 1099:talk 1085:talk 1067:talk 1063:Ronz 1040:talk 1022:talk 1007:talk 990:talk 955:talk 936:talk 921:help 909:the 907:join 880:talk 862:talk 847:talk 825:talk 784:talk 760:talk 733:talk 711:talk 683:talk 664:Talk 655:and 642:talk 629:Talk 620:. -- 560:talk 545:and 527:talk 490:talk 475:talk 455:talk 441:talk 427:talk 412:talk 397:talk 381:talk 366:talk 338:talk 317:talk 240:talk 115:sign 87:and 4632:Hi, 4245:466 4163:FAQ 3672:Avi 3532:or 3484:can 3474:You 3327:DRV 3300:or 2848:466 2769:466 1837:ΔT 1785:ΔT 1779:VPR 1674:AFC 1617:on 1411:did 1348:AGF 1305:FYI 1163:| 801:Van 661:| 626:| 211:. 4686:: 4674:) 4650:, 4567:) 4559:. 4539:-- 4468:. 4421:. 4367:) 4316:) 4291:) 4219:) 4185:) 4155:| 4095:) 4078:) 4064:) 4046:) 4026:) 3961:-- 3941:? 3938:: 3924:) 3904:? 3901:: 3889:re 3882:) 3854:) 3771:| 3732:) 3717:) 3693:) 3678:) 3629:) 3614:. 3604:) 3573:| 3563:) 3544:) 3465:) 3457:. 3442:) 3412:) 3393:) 3347:) 3319:) 3289:) 3240:) 3221:) 3159:) 3053:) 3004:) 2990:) 2961:) 2953:. 2930:) 2883:-- 2878:?? 2866:) 2824:) 2806:) 2734:) 2714:. 2694:) 2679:) 2652:) 2644:. 2606:) 2592:) 2574:) 2530:) 2489:) 2462:) 2420:CN 2411:LI 2393:) 2373:CN 2364:LI 2324:) 2299:) 2284:) 2266:) 2252:) 2238:) 2224:) 2209:) 2169:) 2149:. 2130:) 2106:) 2084:) 2070:) 2062:. 2052:) 2037:) 2029:-- 1947:) 1941:Uʔ 1877:. 1861:) 1855:Uʔ 1853:. 1807:) 1772:) 1754:}} 1748:{{ 1721:► 1667:) 1648:) 1573:) 1547:) 1506:) 1476:) 1454:) 1407:}} 1401:{{ 1388:) 1340:) 1332:! 1321:) 1295:) 1274:) 1229:) 1211:) 1190:) 1147:) 1122:) 1101:) 1087:) 1069:) 1042:) 1024:) 1009:) 992:) 957:) 938:) 930:-- 882:) 864:) 849:) 827:) 809:WS 786:) 763:· 735:) 713:) 688:— 649:li 562:) 529:) 492:) 477:) 457:) 443:) 429:) 414:) 399:) 383:) 368:) 340:) 319:) 242:) 4670:( 4605:ℜ 4563:( 4363:( 4312:( 4287:( 4240:N 4235:J 4215:( 4181:( 4169:. 4151:( 4125:e 4091:( 4074:( 4060:( 4042:( 4022:( 3993:e 3969:) 3965:( 3920:( 3878:( 3850:( 3728:( 3713:( 3689:( 3674:( 3625:( 3600:( 3559:( 3540:( 3461:( 3438:( 3408:( 3389:( 3343:( 3315:( 3285:( 3236:( 3217:( 3181:. 3155:( 3141:. 3049:( 3000:( 2986:( 2957:( 2926:( 2889:2 2862:( 2843:N 2838:J 2820:( 2802:( 2764:N 2759:J 2730:( 2690:( 2675:( 2648:( 2635:· 2630:( 2602:( 2588:( 2570:( 2526:( 2485:( 2458:( 2447:. 2417:/ 2414:| 2407:M 2403:R 2389:( 2370:/ 2367:| 2360:M 2356:R 2320:( 2295:( 2280:( 2262:( 2248:( 2234:( 2220:( 2205:( 2165:( 2126:( 2102:( 2080:( 2066:( 2048:( 2033:( 1970:. 1967:c 1962:τ 1957:Σ 1943:( 1928:. 1925:c 1920:τ 1915:Σ 1886:M 1882:S 1857:( 1803:( 1801:ʔ 1768:( 1690:. 1663:( 1644:( 1608:. 1569:( 1543:( 1502:( 1472:( 1450:( 1384:( 1336:( 1317:( 1291:( 1270:( 1225:( 1207:( 1186:( 1143:( 1118:( 1097:( 1083:( 1065:( 1038:( 1020:( 1005:( 988:( 953:( 934:( 878:( 860:( 845:( 823:( 782:( 769:) 757:( 731:( 709:( 681:( 640:( 582:. 558:( 525:( 488:( 473:( 453:( 439:( 425:( 410:( 395:( 379:( 364:( 336:( 315:( 303:. 296:. 238:( 183:. 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index