User talk:Ɱ/Archive 2 - Knowledge (XXG)

1151:

place, so I added another source (a blog) to correct that. By chance these two sources were the only ones I could find at the time. So far so good. Under the general rule for sources, one should use reliable sources. In the absence of reliable sources one may use questionable sources, if the info can be deemed correct. (This applies very often to genealogic info on sites like RootsWeb or Family Tree Maker. I personally rather leave info out altogether when it comes only from questionable sources.) If you can find better sources, substitute them, by all means. I hope that, understanding the sequence of my thoughts and actions, you get less upset. Knowledge (XXG) is a collborative effort. When another user challenges your contributions, it's not meant to attack you, but to improve the overall quality of articles. Cheers.

3561:, From last night, I noticed that about one hour after your fair warning to that editor to stop disruptive editing, that he/she resumed the pattern of further deleting citations and text from the article, and then tagging the article as uncited. This process seems to have been on a "slow-boil" incremental approach used by that editor over 6 weeks to having the article delisted. I imagine that the choice has come down to whether to allow that editor to continue with his/her clever "slow-boil" delisting of the article. You might try to reason further with that editor to stop inserting superfluous tags as you tried to do yesterday. Since I am supportive of your edits on that article, I would tend to support your version of the editing conduct at this time. 1065:, I cannot read carefully when you condense statements in your edit summary; that is why I stated my confusion. Regardless, the blog source is unacceptable. I am working to improve the article and I have reliable sources for information on the death date and place. When I finish adding said information and sources, I will remove the blog source as unnecessary and less preferred in Knowledge (XXG). I also will remove the NYT source because it conflicts with your opinion on available text. Most will find that source very unhelpful, and I will find better sources for the information the NYT article supports. I hope that is acceptable to you. -- 3509:

with citation request templates. This was done before I could complete the investigation with admin:GFoley4 who felt it was more properly referred to as direct Vandalism. My report and diffs for this are on Talk:GFoley4 who has been on Wikibreak since last week. Prior to that, I reported the matter to admin:Eustress with a long list of diffs, and Eustress seemed to feel it looked like an ANI issue against the same disruptive editor (the prelim report is on Talk:Eustress under my name). I mention this in case you did not see these reports and because the tag bombing appears to be on the verge of delisting

1562:

figures from The Faculty Lounge, which is a curated blog run by law school professors, are more reliable than those from either the ABA or the schools themselves. The profs who run the blog have put a lot of thought and work into figuring out accurate ways to measure these things, and this blog almost certainly falls under the exception to SPS about authors whose other work has been widely published by independent reliable third parties. Anyway, I just thought I'd drop you a line here, because there's nothing that special about this with regard to that one school. Cheers!—

711:, I apologize for any misconduct or miscommunication. Every time I have assisted others with reviews of their draft articles, I have tried to work with them on specific points much in the same manner as I had been doing with this draft. In all cases, my full intention is to create as good of a Knowledge (XXG) article as possible, not to glorify the subject in any way. If you want to stop the copyedit, feel free to. I have greatly appreciated your work so far, and will step back from commenting if that is an issue. -- 1012:, I do not know where you found the idea about print sources being unacceptable; it's ridiculous. Please refer to specific text in a policy or guideline that states what you suggest, because otherwise your viewpoints are less than important. As well, the number and quality of sources is not relevant. That blog is written by a single individual, with no peer-review process or independent verification of the published information. It is completely unacceptable as a reliable source. -- 3664: 1605: 31: 3341: 2822:), I prefer not to give it in the article. A lot of times with single-property listings, (and it's true with this listing) it's someone's house, and although you can get the address from other sources online I don't think it's really necessary to impinge on their privacy this way, with something that will come up so high on search results. And frankly the actual address is really not encyclopedic information. 3049: 2556: 2152: 3621: 246:

I think that good information with an RS that is relevant to the village and not relevant or appropriate anywhere else should stay largely in full form. The parks&rec section, as I noted in general at Talk:Thunderbird, is largely referenced from the citation at the end of the section's first paragraph. A few additional citations lie within the section.

3471: 2468: 2413: 2061: 285:

so should probably be made into its own section, even if short. And I suppose the length is fine—you've obviously got citations for everything, so perhaps that isn't much of an issue. I'll be interested to see what sorts of images you're planning on getting still, and what happens with GA/FA status on this—I imagine it will fair quite well. Cheers!

2509:, it ends up a bit confused, and maybe not how you intended it to look (your source suggests that both your username and talk link should be drop-shadowed, but in practice it's only applied to your username). The syntax highlighter looks at all this and just sees an unclosed tag, so all content for the rest of the talk page is highlighted in pink. 986:. I take your word for the accuracy, but I still don't know what's written there. Besides, you did state a wrong death date, and omitted the death place. The blog in question clears up the wrong statement in the New York Times about "Somerville, North Carolina" (an inexistent place). Although blogs are discouraged, and are in principle 2743:– Yeah, border lines can be confusing, especially when postal zones, school districts, municipal boundaries, and people's conceptions don't match up. I suppose I'll mention the Hammond House in the Eastview article, even if you'd rather keep the house described as in the hamlet of Hawthorne than the section/area of Eastview.-- 252:

because I incorporated temporary images and text for reference from the Albany, Irvington, and Chadderton articles. If you look in the draft's history from about a month or two ago, you'll find several less-local images and paragraphs. As well, the seal and symbol images will be changed, right now they are fair use images

1971:, your reference does not make any correlation that the region is anywhere within the river valley of the Hudson. It merely indicates that one region of New Jersey is designated as the "Hudson Valley region" by the New Jersey Forest Service Ecomap Project. For that reason it cannot be used definitively as a source.-- 831:, especially as the second bullet explains. I can attempt to rectify the problem anyway. Areas like "Media" and "Parks&rec" have close paraphrasing, unavoidable while being succinct. That is all that should resemble any other text. I'm sorry that I did not think to bring that up ahead of time. Thanks. -- 3508:

page seems to be part of his/her extended vandalism to the Knowledge (XXG) page over the last 6 weeks. The same user apparently had the objective of spurring someone else to initiate the delisting of Knowledge (XXG) from GA status by a pattern of removing cites from the Page and then marking the Page

3142:

The article isn't completely devoid of content and it does verify that it's an actual hamlet, so I applied the long-standing AfD precedent that such places shouldn't be deleted. That said, the article's so short that it probably could be merged to the town article until/unless someone expands it, and

1561:

I completely agree with you about the non-neutral tone of that edit you reverted. That IP's been making similar changes across broad swaths of law school articles recently, and I just haven't had the heart to deal with it. On the other hand, there's a strong case to be made that postgrad employment

1345:

Clever, right? Anyway, I wanted to apologize for dropping the ball on reviewing your Briarcliff draft recently. I was traveling for a week in late January, lost the thread, and I've been swamped with IRL obligations since. Since I see that you haven't yet updated the entry (although I do believe your

1249:

Thanks for the further suggestions, I'll work towards implementing them. If you would be okay with helping further, I would rather appreciate it, although I'd request that you hold off for a bit. Recently, the user Miniapolis has been copyediting the draft, and it might be best to hold off until he's

430:

tone and, possibly, an embarrassment of detail; are you by any chance the village historian or equivalent? I can certainly tone down the POV and (possibly) unencyclopedic content, keeping in mind that many FAs concern subjects considered arcane by some. The ideal article on Briarcliff would, I think,

245:

advocates, and the information isn't independently notable or have enough reliable sources to constitute individual articles, unless there was an article solely on Parks&rec of Briarcliff Manor or for its neighborhoods. Neutralhomer made the same comment on the religious life section as well, but

166:

FWIW, this comes out of my experience working with Indian tribes. It seems to me that they might take issue with the land being listed as the "early history" of a later settlement, which in fact it had nothing to do with their habitation of the land; labeling it distinctly makes that more clear—see,

1447:

I saw the edits come in as well, and was wondering how you'd want to tackle them. Some of the rewording seems good, while of course it's now misleading in stating an active partnership with Laureate. As for the "1990s and 2000s" section, I suppose those edits are fine, unless you see something that

1150:

Please don't be upset. To get to the point: You omitted the death place, and stated a wrong death date. Since I can not read your off-line sources, I can not know what's written there. When I added the death date, I added a source, the New York Times. This source stated an inexistent place as death

731:

This is an unprecedented situation for me, an experienced copyeditor; I've never been asked for a detailed copyedit of a userspace draft, let alone been called upon to justify my edits this much. After I finish the article to which I've just committed, I'll continue the copyedit if you let me do my

284:

Hey ɱ, sorry I didn't get back to you about this yesterday. Regarding "Prehistory"—I do see what you mean about having a subsection that small, but I think that's okay in a circumstance like this. The prehistory of the area is, strictly speaking, not a part of the history of the settlement, really,

240:

I agree that 'prehistory' and 'early history' may be better, but the prehistory section would consist of five short sentences, and to my knowledge subsections shouldn't be split that short. So I'm rather divided on that one. Neighborhoods and parks&rec are long, but the article still doesn't go

2837:

Makes sense, although I always have looked for street addresses in articles – it tells me right away what community a place is part of and the postal zone. And I know that listing addresses of private homes might seem somewhat intrusive, but hey, we provide GPS coordinates right to their location,

456:

Yeah, I admit that some content may appear as 'wikipuffery'; I tried to cut out most of it as well as the boastful wording, but some of it was interesting enough for me to desire keeping it. Perhaps you can assist with all of that without too much content removal. I would like a formal copyedit; I

550:

Well, thanks. I very much approve of all of your edits, although I'm not sure why you edited the caption; the public library in the village is the Briarcliff Manor Village Library, and the CBD (usually a generic term) is referred to in title case in documents like the Village's 2007 Comprehensive

397:

You're welcome; I also have further interior and exterior shots that I may add to the Commons page. I don't particularly like any of the Juniper Ledge images, but I was planning to only retake ones from the street (in warmer weather). I live less than ten minutes away from the house, so you don't

2918:

Thanks! I knew there was a system for outside opinions, but I didn't even want to look for it; I've had bad experiences with ANI or RFC, I forget which, it's been a while. I'll implement the signature code; I've been using wikEd, so I wouldn't have seen the issue. Do you prefer User:Remember the

1662:

with some updates that I think should be made to the article (namely, updating the school's U.S. News and World Report ranks, and adding information about the Higher Learning Commission's decision about the proposed partnership with Laureate). Do you think you might have a chance to take a look?

1270:

Upon brief view of all of your new comments, many are suggestions about changing things that Miniapolis implemented, and for most I am not sure if there is a standard or guideline to follow, especially regarding the conversions. Miniapolis requested that I hold off on changing his edits until he

251:

Thank you for the compliments, and I'll note that I'm hoping to wait for a few more photographs and other details before I publish this to the main namespace. I never initially did because I had to experiment with several unfamiliar templates, which would look ugly in the main namespace. As well

337:

i don't know why you do a revert when you actually agree with getting rid of the old content. silly. you are right – b/c you reverted a valid deletion, I re-deleted without even reading what you wrote. i allowed combative style on your part to provoke me to do the same. that is my bad. the new

1492:

Overall, I feel like these changes are pretty problematic as well, since there are now typos, wrong info, and repetition in the article. I think the shortening of the Hippocratic Oath part is probably fine, assuming we can get the typos and inaccuracies out, though. What do you think? Cheers,

2809:

used Hawthorne as the location, so we'll stick with that in the article (and the note should explain it to the reader who rolls over it .. I'll add one in the lede). Second, unless the listing name actually includes the address (surprisingly, there aren't any among the 200+ NRHP listings in

457:

know that sentences can be reworded or reordered for more clarity or readability. I should note that I am just a resident, although I plan to contact the BMSHS for historical images and further content (note that the history section has not one image). Thanks so much, I do appreciate it.--

1424:

that look problematic to me. Not only are they incorrect in places (for example, the introduction now reads as if the partnership with Laureate is distinct from the school itself), they also seem to introduce bias and, in some cases, weasely language (e.g., "For undisclosed reasons").

1350:

before giving feedback. Any specific sections or aspects you'd like input about? Got a checklist? I appreciate the help you've provided with article rewrites I have worked on previously, and I'd like to return the favor. If there's something smaller I can bite off, I'll chew it. Best,

575:

Your edits to the "Toponymy" section are all very good, I should've worded the paragraph better. I should note that I believe you should remove two wikilinks, the one to "Smilax" (because "briar" is still a part of the layman's vocabulary, and more importantly because as shown on the

260:, and I hope to secure the images into Creative Commons or public domain licenses. In addition, I aspire to make this into a featured article, which should take a good deal more work, and I would like to polish the draft considerably before I make any attempt at a GAN and then FAR.-- 379:

Thanks for adding the pictures! Of course, while I'm glad to have one in nice weather in the infobox, the one I took that you moved to the gallery was, in fact, newer than the one that's there now. Perhaps I'll have to go back down there in warmer weather and take the same angle.

2939:

3O is painless and drama-free, you just put a one-line request up and someone will drop by the talk page to offer their thoughts. I think wikEd seemed a bit excessive when I tried it; Remember the Dot's one just uses pastel coloured backgrounds to otherwise regular text.

3760:

Hi... Yes, I would get around to it... in the interim, I simply used the data that was on the History page, and condensed it. If there was a citation there, I would have moved it over. By all means, add a ref needed tag, maybe someone else can get to it before I do.

2230:: Well, you can't give all the credit to me; I stole most of the code off someone else's page and later added and took out bits, and also grabbed other pieces from other people's pages to create what suits me best. The code to my page can be found on at this page: 2505:(which I recommend) is confused by the markup in your signature; the fact that you've got a span that starts in the middle of your username link and is closed in the middle of your talk page link. When this is unpacked in a browser, replacing the wikilinks with 652:, which seems to support items like "the Briarcliff Manor Village Library" being written in title case. I'm not sure which section of MOS:CAPS you are trying to direct me to. As well, perhaps I should specify that I had not yet added the village seal because of 525:

I've done the lead and should be through the article in a few days (my "cruising speed" for copyediting is about 2,000 words a day :-)); it's very good! Will you be able to upload the village seal with a fair-use rationale for use in the infobox? All the best,

789:

While trying to clarify the last paragraph of the "Post-Progressive Era" section (it's my understanding that an appellate court handles appeals, rather than an issue such as the annexation, but I'm not an attorney), I discovered that it was word-for-word from

610:

Let me repeat that you're free to revert any changes you don't like (within reason—I don't waste my time :-)), keeping in mind that similar issues may be raised by a GA or FA reviewer. I link words I'm uncertain about (and my vocabulary is pretty extensive);

1370:

You're too kind. As for the draft, I'm only awaiting some pictures to put in the image-barren history section, but if you don't mind, I'll keep you in mind for future projects. And I'm always willing to help you or your colleagues out with articles. Ciao!

1095:

I will add that people reading and editing can check the sources; the book is freely and publicly available. Print sources standardly pass WP:V with flying colors. Any administrator will inform you that non-digitized print sources that qualify as RSs are

478: 3742:: Did you mean to add references to your history summary? There are several published history volumes on the county, some of which are on Google Books. I suppose I'll add an 'unreferenced section' tag to that summary until we add a good amount.-- 2858:

Which are you more likely to type into Google or Bing maps's search field—an address or coordinates? Which do you use to address snail mail? Look up a phone number? Privacy is about more than people wanting to go over and look at the house.

1879:

They're actually very nice photos. I won't revert your edit, but someone else may. They just don't seem to fit into the article, which really is about some other topic. Why don't you make a gallery on the Commons, and add a link?

2621:

Thanks for doing that. Now there's no source saying that he had little knowledge of farming, although you could put "...that Law went from being a carpet salesman to shipping...", or you could say "...that Law owned the village of

1720:

Hey again Ɱ, thanks for updating the rankings section. I'm curious if you had any thoughts about how to update the information about the Laureate proposal? It's a bit tricky, so definitely open to your thoughts there. Cheers!

3292:: Did you know Joe Lalak? Anyway, I looked at them, and they need reliable sources; I'm in the midst of looking for some. But thanks for bringing Speyer to my attention again, I didn't know he had a Knowledge (XXG) article.-- 3246:: Did you know Joe Lalak? Anyway, I looked at them, and they need reliable sources; I'm in the midst of looking for some. But thanks for bringing Speyer to my attention again, I didn't know he had a Knowledge (XXG) article.-- 3200:: Did you know Joe Lalak? Anyway, I looked at them, and they need reliable sources; I'm in the midst of looking for some. But thanks for bringing Speyer to my attention again, I didn't know he had a Knowledge (XXG) article.-- 220:

P.S. So, I typed all the above, and then saw your note at Talk:Thunderbird about working on the draft based on another editor's comments. If you want me to take another pass when you've finished with those, just let me know!

2811: 2877: 1048:" If there's no link, nobody can check anything. Besides, I did not remove any of your sources, they are still there. I just added one more, for verifiability. I did the review, and found the statement to be correct. 551:

Plan (see ref 42). As well, the pool and clock are (to my knowledge from reading through the sources) always referred to in title case. The correct images for the village seal and symbol are the ones currently on the

1943:

I found that Sussex County in New Jersey is part of the geographic region that makes up the Hudson Valley. The findings can be found in a study the Federal Parks department published in 2000. Here is the link:

189:

This is especially true regarding Chilmark—from how this is written, it seems to not even be a part of Braircliff Manor proper, but has it's history enumerated in this section. Maybe consider trimming this down a

1391:

OK, I'm glad to hear it's almost there! Yes, I'd be happy to help in the future, and for now I'll just offer the same advisory: the narrower the request, the more quickly I'll be able to follow through. Cheers,

431:

be somewhere between the present article and yours (but a lot closer to yours! :-)). Let me know if you'd like a formal copyedit; of course, you're free to revert any of my changes you don't like. All the best,

158:

I'd like to suggest that the "Early history" section be broken into two sections: "Prehistory", for the archaeology and Indian habitation stuff, and "Early history" for when we start to get dates and a European

580:

disambig page, "briar" may not always refer to Smilax), and the one to "Sing Sing" (which gives a false correlation to the penitentiary, while the real correlation here is to the village of Ossining). Thanks.

798:; basically, if you use a source word-for-word, you have to treat it as a quote with in-text attribution (not just a citation). If there's other text like that, please rewrite it in your own words (avoiding 197:

The list under "Parks and recreation" is also seems a bit long for such a small area, especially given than some of the bullets don't have sources; I'd suggest those simply come out to make the section more

827:

I'm sorry, that was one case where the wording was technical, and it would be hard to have original writing while conveying the same information so condensely. I honestly think it applies as a form of

2322:

I can't directly block him. I was going to submit him to the "Administrator intervention against vandalism" page but I see you already have done that. Therefore we should wait for a result from it.--

1481:

Finally, the fact that Thunderbird left the Garvin name behind is now mentioned twice, both at the end of the first mention, "...a name that was dropped three years later", and in the next paragraph.

2212:

Hey man! I was impressed by your userpage design and was wondering how you did it. It would be amazing to know, I'm really curious. Specially putting all thise boxes transparent inside the picture.

855:: "Copying from a source acknowledged in a well-placed citation, without in-text attribution". In any case, I'll return to the copyedit when I finish the other article I'm working on. All the best, 680:(WP is a collaboration and frankly, I haven't had this much "supervision" even with FA candidates). It might be best to hold off on a full copyedit until (and if :-)) the page goes live; please see 107: 3094: 3019: 103: 1859:

Thank you. Would you mind if I re-added the collapsed fire department gallery also? The images would only be more useful on a page for the department itself, a page which doesn't yet exist.--

1036:

say that your printed sources are "unacceptable", I said that I (or any other user) can not read them, since they are not available on-line. Is that too difficult to understand? I quote from

505:

Thanks so much. I plan to take photos in summer and autumn of all of the parks (as well as several other buildings and places), at least for the commons category if not for the article.--

2954:

Okay, I'll try 3O next time, thanks for the suggestion. And, yeah, I suppose wikEd has more and perhaps excessive features, but I find a few of them to be useful, so I'm okay with it.--

2352:? That section was relatively out of place; there is no mention of any type of service in the lead, and adding in some for only two lines seems a bit out of place. Leave a message on 1116:

Go right ahead improving the article, and try not to get het up when somebody else contributes to articles you created. It's difficult in the beginning, as I very well know. Cheers.

917:, but as of yet, it doesn't look like anyone has had time to take a look. Most of these edits are pretty small, just updating information, but I'd sure appreciate the help! Cheers, 909:

Hey there ɱ, hope you're doing well. I'm wondering if you might be able to help me out with another small, education-related project—namely, making some updates to the article for

1194: 154:

improvement over the current article, and is really solid overall. I've left you a couple of comments below, but really, I feel like this is more than ready for primetime.

1894:

Thanks again for contacting me. Sorry to snap at you by deleting the gallery earlier. It looks great and it shows off something to be proud of. Thanks for your edits.

1190: 648:

Okay, thanks for clearing it up. That said, I'll remove the two wikilinks. On another note, another read-through of MOS:CAPS led me to believe the issue is discussed in

1250:

finished (probably some time next week), just to prevent redundancies. I could send you a talk page message once Miniapolis is done, if you'd like. Thanks so much. --

2594: 3628:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 2714:

about the closest settlement, but Valhalla gives it a good run for that title). Also consider that the area wasn't as developed as it is now when it was listed.

2903:

is useful if you ever hit a two-person stalemate on a talk page again. It's often better to bring in an entirely uninvolved party to help resolve a dispute. --

802:

of copyrighted material without in-text attribution). Let me know when you've done this, because further copyediting will just muddy the waters. All the best,

3809:

and click "Show more" (right above "ALL COMMENTS"), it says that the video is licensed under CC Attribution. That's what I was trying to direct you towards.--

2880:. Consensus is coming down that at least Hawthorne is out, but as a native of the area your input on the question of Eastview vs. Valhalla might be valuable. 2300:, it keeps adding fast food chain to every one of the articles without providing any reliable third party source nor drawing support from the article itself. 1130:

Yet you still believe that un-digitized books do not pass WP:V? I am upset at both sources that you added, and will replace them with more acceptable ones. --

1659: 1204: 117: 3681: 3274:

article -- you will find references there to the Waldheim estate. BTW -- I worked at Philips at that very location for twelve years, hence my curiosity.

3228:

article -- you will find references there to the Waldheim estate. BTW -- I worked at Philips at that very location for twelve years, hence my curiosity.

3182:

article -- you will find references there to the Waldheim estate. BTW -- I worked at Philips at that very location for twelve years, hence my curiosity.

3117:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1622: 3849: 619:. Judging by your concerns, I still think you're too close to the subject for a NPOV; however, I didn't know that "Sing Sing" was also an early name for 994:) there's an article with no on-line sources at all, and a blog with (after review accepted as) correct info. For that reason my revert was justified. 3391:

I just added some comments to the FA. I'm curreently working on a draft for an article, but I'll try to get some more comments tomorrow. Is that ok?

2563:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

2502: 2159:

for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can

879:

I understand where you're coming from, and regardless of opinion, I'll plan to fix it tomorrow. Thanks for the notification and continued efforts.--

3104: 2234:. Try pasting it into a sandbox page and customize it for your own username and photos. If you have questions or anything, don't hesitate to ask.-- 95: 656:

criterion #9. So it may be best to end up adding the correct village seal image once the draft is published. Thanks again for all of the help. --

3318:

Please look more carefully. There is plenty of discussion about the name change on the Talk page. I forebear to say any more at this stage. --

3629: 1200: 202:

Hope this helps! And really, even if you're still working on this, I don't see any reason it can't be moved over into the mainspace. Cheers!

113: 3615: 2550: 2146: 2297: 3114: 1997:

That sounds like a good plan. The list has gotten very long and anything to get it down is good. I'll start in the next couple of days –

732:

job. After I'm done, you can revert as much or as little as you want; I was tempted to add "it's your article", but that runs counter to

2977:

Since we've now hit the unedifying spectacle of one editor reverting two others and telling them to seek consensus, I've raised this at

2091: 1954: 2763:

Oh no ... go ahead; that's geographically where it is. (Another source of this confusion: fire/fire protection district boundaries).

1950:

Can you add this to the Hudson Valley Wiki page? If you feel this is not correct could you provide information to support? Thanks!

791: 3611: 3604: 3457: 3450: 3785:

I initially wasn't able to find any licensing info for the videos; finally saw it at the very end of the actual video. Thanks,

3474:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

2471:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

2416:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

2064:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

2666: 2611: 2156: 1631: 1197:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 982:

Books are certainly good sources, but if the reader of the Knowledge (XXG) article can not read them on-line, the info is not

110:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1567: 1478:, it's clear that the name change happened before Cabrera was hired, but as written, it seems like it might be the opposite. 615:

is a generic word linking, sure enough, to a dab page so I tried to be more specific. As for the capitalization, please see

2106:

Okay, thanks! I'll review your notes later today or tomorrow. (Here nobody's been watching the World Cup. Who's winning?)--

426:

I read the other editor's comments (now archived), and primarily agree with them. The article is very good, except for its

2519:

Here's a version that it's happier with, and which renders the same as your current signature, for what it's worth: ] ] --

3055: 1182: 3706:

Hi. Good move on creating the history page... are you working on the summary for the main article? If so, I won't...

2193:

I'm not sure what your intention was, but your edit to the Help desk removed other editors' comments. I reverted it.--

3833:

You have pictures of the other sides? Where are they? We might be able to use one or two in the description section.

3345: 94:

Hi. Thank you for your rfecent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3566: 3518: 3118: 3100: 3084: 3067: 2803: 2564: 2160: 2142: 2135: 2047: 2040: 1181:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

552: 38: 3600: 3446: 2535: 2443: 2388: 2131: 2036: 1577:

Thanks for the notification. If someone doesn't beat me to it, I'll be happy to correct those pages later today.--

1475: 81: 76: 71: 59: 2718: 1563: 620: 3806: 3127: 253: 2819: 2289: 1428:

Would you have time to take a look and, if these edits look problematic to you as well, revert them? Thanks!

1958: 3030: 2815: 2305: 1239: 257: 799: 3793: 3079: 3048: 2399: 2392: 1945: 681: 3838: 3648: 3562: 3528: 3514: 3490: 3060: 2885: 2864: 2827: 2768: 2730: 1899: 1885: 1849: 1804: 851:

We'll have to agree to disagree; I see it as a pretty straightforward (albeit unintentional) example of

385: 2706:

Yes, I've noticed that too. I'm going to add something to the effect that (I suspect) the NPS used the

649: 242: 182:

I feel like the "Neighborhoods" section is perhaps a bit too long for a town of less than 8,000 people.

3575:

I'll formulate some replies tomorrow or the day after, unfortunately I've been rather busy recently.--

3692: 3670: 3663: 2722: 2717:

It's not the first time this sort of thing has happened with a Westchester NRHP ... as you know, the

2583: 2487: 2296:

Can you block this IP or at least revert all his edits. I checked this IP's entire edit history, see

1301: 914: 865: 812: 746: 694: 633: 536: 491: 441: 2802:

To elaborate on the reasons I gave for undoing your edit: First, however head-scratching it is, the

427: 2658: 2603: 2179: 2098: 2080: 2001: 1764: 1726: 1707: 1668: 1536: 1498: 1433: 961: 922: 481:(I'm a Guild coordinator), I'll copyedit it (BTW, the park pictures are beautiful!). All the best, 290: 226: 207: 3531:, thanks for bringing this to my attention; are there any further steps I should be involved in?-- 2090:

Hi there, I finally torn myself away from the World Cup for long enough to finish the review (see

1468:

Thanks for taking a look! I see three problems in the "1990s and 2000s" section as it stands now:

3766: 3711: 3144: 3026: 2986: 2945: 2908: 2631: 2560: 2524: 2317: 2301: 1235: 3465: 2978: 2462: 2407: 2055: 653: 3802: 3787: 3625: 3432: 3396: 3357: 3323: 3164: 3153: 2432: 2376: 2361: 2353: 2273: 2259: 2217: 1639: 1611: 1604: 1397: 1356: 1220: 1156: 1121: 1053: 999: 168: 133: 3349: 3333: 1682:

I'll try to help you out, and if I don't get to it today, I should be able to on Thursday. --

852: 828: 795: 3834: 3644: 3639: 3486: 3481: 3279: 3233: 3187: 3108: 2881: 2860: 2823: 2764: 2740: 2726: 2627: 2623: 1968: 1895: 1881: 1845: 1815: 1800: 381: 343: 3860: 3817: 3750: 3729: 3583: 3556: 3539: 3417: 3375: 3300: 3254: 3208: 3007: 2962: 2929: 2848: 2787: 2753: 2684: 2642: 2332: 2244: 2116: 2023: 1981: 1918: 1869: 1828: 1749: 1692: 1587: 1521: 1458: 1381: 1325: 1281: 1260: 1140: 1106: 1075: 1022: 946: 889: 841: 770: 733: 721: 677: 666: 591: 565: 515: 467: 408: 363: 319: 270: 47: 17: 3688: 2579: 2574: 2483: 2478: 2349: 2198: 1292: 910: 856: 803: 737: 708: 685: 624: 527: 482: 432: 3461: 2900: 2458: 2403: 2051: 1042:

In Knowledge (XXG), verifiability means that people reading and editing the encyclopedia

987: 1346:

draft is far superior) I wonder if there is a way I can help short of having to read it

555:

article (I just can't place them in a sandbox). Thanks again for your efforts so far. --

2653: 2598: 2175: 2170: 2095: 2076: 2071: 2010: 1998: 1768: 1760: 1730: 1722: 1711: 1703: 1672: 1664: 1540: 1532: 1502: 1494: 1437: 1429: 1186: 965: 957: 926: 918: 294: 286: 230: 222: 211: 203: 3340: 3097:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 1037: 983: 3762: 3739: 3707: 2996: 2982: 2941: 2904: 2546: 2539: 2520: 2454: 2447: 1211:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

991: 124:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

3865: 3842: 3822: 3796: 3770: 3755: 3734: 3715: 3696: 3677: 3652: 3588: 3570: 3544: 3522: 3494: 3436: 3422: 3400: 3380: 3367:

I am aware of the policies. I put it there temporarily. Now I don't need it there.--

3361: 3327: 3305: 3283: 3259: 3237: 3213: 3191: 3168: 3147: 3034: 3012: 2990: 2967: 2949: 2934: 2912: 2889: 2868: 2853: 2831: 2792: 2772: 2758: 2734: 2689: 2671: 2647: 2616: 2587: 2528: 2491: 2436: 2380: 2365: 2337: 2309: 2277: 2263: 2249: 2231: 2221: 2202: 2183: 2121: 2101: 2084: 2028: 2004: 1986: 1962: 1923: 1903: 1889: 1874: 1853: 1833: 1808: 1772: 1754: 1734: 1715: 1697: 1676: 1647: 1618: 1592: 1571: 1544: 1526: 1506: 1463: 1441: 1405: 1386: 1364: 1330: 1310: 1286: 1265: 1243: 1224: 1160: 1145: 1125: 1111: 1080: 1057: 1027: 1003: 969: 951: 930: 894: 874: 846: 821: 775: 755: 726: 703: 671: 642: 596: 570: 545: 520: 500: 472: 450: 413: 389: 368: 347: 324: 309:

No problem. I tried out the additional subsection and it looks fine. Thanks again!--

298: 275: 234: 215: 137: 3635: 3477: 3428: 3406: 3392: 3353: 3319: 3271: 3225: 3179: 3160: 2570: 2555: 2474: 2428: 2423: 2419: 2372: 2357: 2269: 2255: 2227: 2213: 2166: 2151: 2067: 1643: 1635: 1401: 1393: 1360: 1352: 1216: 1212: 1152: 1117: 1062: 1049: 1009: 995: 129: 125: 3510: 3505: 1315:

My mistake. Realized, but poorly corrected. Thank you again for your hard work. --

2512:(For some reason the syntax highlighter doesn't like you closing a font tag with 1291:

I'm (finally) done with the copyedit (she said :-)). Good luck and all the best,

3289: 3275: 3243: 3229: 3197: 3183: 2013:: OK, I'll begin formulating comments for the Hagley article tomorrow. Thanks!-- 1474:

The new order, of hiring Cabrera and the name change with Garvin, is incorrect.

339: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3853: 3810: 3743: 3722: 3576: 3549: 3532: 3410: 3368: 3293: 3247: 3201: 3000: 2955: 2920: 2839: 2778: 2744: 2677: 2635: 2323: 2235: 2107: 2014: 1972: 1909: 1860: 1819: 1740: 1739:

I apologise for the delay, I'll be sure to finish updating the content soon. --

1683: 1578: 1512: 1449: 1372: 1316: 1272: 1251: 1131: 1097: 1066: 1013: 937: 880: 832: 761: 712: 657: 582: 556: 506: 458: 399: 354: 310: 261: 3075: 2652:

Sorry for that mistake, added all your suggestions and a few of mine. Thanks,

2194: 990:, it depends on the particular case whether it can be accepted. In this case ( 2094:). I'll go through your notes on the Hagley article in the next day thanks – 1418:

Hey ɱ, hope you're doing well. Over the weekend, that were some edits to the

1414:

Some recent edits to Thunderbird School of Global Management—your thoughts?

175:

doesn't actually mention anything before history of the current settlement.

150:

Just took a look at your Briarcliff Manor draft, and I must say, this is a

3456:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

2453:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

2398:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

2046:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

2707: 1844:

Thanks for your message. I added a few photos to the Valhalla article.

616: 3620: 2371:

Thank you for understanding :) I will put a message on their talk page.

1759:

No problem at all! Let me know if you have questions or need anything!

1271:

finishes, so I would rather work on these details after he finishes. --

99: 3470: 2838:

and how's that any more respectful of privacy than a street address?--

2467: 2412: 2060: 1946:

http://www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/pubs/sustain/landscape_classif/hudson.pdf

1658:

Hey Ɱ, hope you're doing well. I recently posted a short note over at

3504:

Your recent comment against a disruptive editor earlier today on the

3131: 3072:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was 172: 2292:

adding fast food to every major food outlet across the United States

3409:: Yeah no that's perfectly fine. Thanks for your comments so far.-- 736:. Keep in mind that it's no easier in mainspace :-). All the best, 2268:

Again, thank you for helping my user page! I truly appreciate it.

2254:

Thank you so much! My page now has true class. What do you think?

612: 577: 1511:

So I ended up reverting almost all of the changes. Looks fine? --

1234:

I left some feedback on my talk page. Do you still want my help?

676:

Let me know if you want me to continue the copyedit; I'm sensing

3312: 2999:– yeah, I found that rather funny. Thanks for your assistance.-- 2626:?", or "..that Law went from carpet dealership to establishing 1471:

There's a typo—a sentence ends, and then the next begins "and".

3043: 25: 2710:

of the house when assigning its location (Hawthorne actually

1791:

Wanna collaborate on an article sometime? I'm active on irc,

3684:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3662: 3095:

Template:Did you know nominations/Sleepy Hollow Country Club

3020:

Template:Did you know nominations/Sleepy Hollow Country Club

2919:

dot's software to it? If so, I'll try it out. Thanks again--

1625:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1603: 2593:

Hi, congratulations on the GA. I have nominated it for DYK

794:(the copyright for which is held by the paper). Please see 2777:

Right, I knew I was forgetting something in that list...--

1936:

Sussex County in New Jersey is part of the Hudson Valley

1420: 1185:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 98:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3093:

The nomination discussion and review may be seen at

1046:

that the information comes from a reliable source...

3850:

Commons:Category:Hammond House (Eastview, New York)

353:Yeah, should've made it more clear. That's okay.-- 1177:Disambiguation link notification for February 17 90:Disambiguation link notification for January 22 398:have to make the journey unless you want to.-- 2597:. Any alternative hooks are welcome. Thanks, 2516:, either – it prefers it without the space.) 8: 3721:I am not yet working on one, feel free to.-- 2725:but has a Briarcliff Manor mailing address. 905:Help with another education-related article? 3159:I redirected this rather than deleting it. 2634:?". There should be more possible DYKs...-- 829:Knowledge (XXG):PLAG#What is not plagiarism 1630:And in fact I've left some suggestions at 3064:was updated with a fact from the article 2501:Minor thing, but for what it's worth the 3632:for things which need to be addressed. 2876:We're discussing the location issue at 1421:Thunderbird School of Global Management 241:over the 60kb readable prose size that 171:for a similar breakdown, and note that 96:Thunderbird School of Global Management 3624:. The article is close to meeting the 3270:Check out the recent additions to the 3224:Check out the recent additions to the 3178:Check out the recent additions to the 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3630:Talk:Briarcliff Manor Fire Department 2814:, with maybe one-fifth that, there's 7: 3669:Hello, Ɱ. You have new messages at 2298:Special:Contributions/142.197.84.109 1610:Hello, Ɱ. You have new messages at 3143:I wouldn't object if you did that. 2092:Talk:Briarcliff Manor, New York/GA1 3040:DYK for Sleepy Hollow Country Club 143:Thoughts on Briarcliff Manor draft 24: 1654:A bit more help with Thunderbird? 1557:Reliability of The Faculty Lounge 3619: 3612:Briarcliff Manor Fire Department 3605:Briarcliff Manor Fire Department 3469: 3458:Briarcliff Manor Fire Department 3451:Briarcliff Manor Fire Department 3339: 3047: 2554: 2466: 2411: 2150: 2059: 760:I appreciate that, thank you. -- 29: 2497:Broken markup in your signature 2157:Talk:Briarcliff Manor, New York 1531:Looks good! Thanks so much, ɱ! 3344:Do not add non-free images to 2348:Why did you revert my edit in 684:. Good luck and all the best, 1: 3348:. Doing so is a violation of 1818:– sure, sounds interesting.-- 1593:17:00, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 1572:16:55, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 1545:23:43, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 1527:19:50, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 1507:19:17, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 1464:17:59, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 1442:14:33, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 1406:15:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 1387:04:34, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 1365:02:30, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 1331:00:55, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 1311:22:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC) 1287:17:10, 14 February 2014 (UTC) 1266:16:54, 14 February 2014 (UTC) 1244:16:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC) 1225:09:08, 17 February 2014 (UTC) 1161:16:59, 12 February 2014 (UTC) 1146:17:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC) 1126:17:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC) 1112:17:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC) 1081:17:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC) 1058:16:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC) 1028:16:46, 10 February 2014 (UTC) 1004:15:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC) 970:17:48, 10 February 2014 (UTC) 952:17:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC) 931:17:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC) 3134:) 02:53, 29 July 2014 (UTC) 2676:Great, looks good. Thanks.-- 1183:Westchester County, New York 1032:Please read carefully: I do 895:01:25, 7 February 2014 (UTC) 875:00:43, 7 February 2014 (UTC) 847:21:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC) 822:20:24, 6 February 2014 (UTC) 776:19:55, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 756:18:51, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 727:16:08, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 704:14:40, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 672:01:34, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 643:00:51, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 597:21:46, 4 February 2014 (UTC) 571:15:48, 4 February 2014 (UTC) 546:15:20, 4 February 2014 (UTC) 521:00:17, 3 February 2014 (UTC) 501:23:59, 2 February 2014 (UTC) 473:20:18, 2 February 2014 (UTC) 451:17:05, 2 February 2014 (UTC) 414:06:17, 3 February 2014 (UTC) 390:06:10, 3 February 2014 (UTC) 369:20:33, 30 January 2014 (UTC) 348:20:14, 30 January 2014 (UTC) 325:15:55, 22 January 2014 (UTC) 299:14:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC) 276:23:17, 17 January 2014 (UTC) 235:22:57, 17 January 2014 (UTC) 216:22:57, 17 January 2014 (UTC) 138:09:10, 22 January 2014 (UTC) 3866:01:19, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 3843:01:17, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 3823:14:55, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 3797:14:49, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 3771:04:56, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 3756:22:57, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 3735:21:31, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 3716:21:11, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 3697:02:10, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 3678:02:10, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 3653:18:23, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 3589:01:09, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 3571:13:18, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 3545:10:43, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 3523:03:29, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 3495:18:02, 21 August 2014 (UTC) 3437:21:13, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 3423:21:13, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 3401:20:45, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 3381:11:50, 15 August 2014 (UTC) 3362:11:29, 15 August 2014 (UTC) 2567:to appear in Did you know. 2163:to appear in Did you know. 913:I posted a request over on 853:WP:PLAG#Forms of plagiarism 477:As soon as I finish up the 3882: 3328:23:25, 7 August 2014 (UTC) 3085:Sleepy Hollow Country Club 3068:Sleepy Hollow Country Club 2143:Briarcliff Manor, New York 2136:Briarcliff Manor, New York 2048:Briarcliff Manor, New York 2041:Briarcliff Manor, New York 1773:19:58, 10 April 2014 (UTC) 1755:17:56, 10 April 2014 (UTC) 1735:17:38, 10 April 2014 (UTC) 1702:Great, thanks so much, Ɱ! 1648:14:00, 19 March 2014 (UTC) 1619:12:32, 19 March 2014 (UTC) 553:Briarcliff Manor, New York 3464:-status according to the 3306:21:05, 31 July 2014 (UTC) 3284:21:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC) 3260:21:05, 31 July 2014 (UTC) 3238:21:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC) 3214:21:05, 31 July 2014 (UTC) 3192:21:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC) 3169:23:44, 29 July 2014 (UTC) 3148:08:20, 29 July 2014 (UTC) 3113:, and it may be added to 3035:18:47, 26 July 2014 (UTC) 3013:13:26, 23 July 2014 (UTC) 2991:13:21, 23 July 2014 (UTC) 2968:11:51, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 2950:11:42, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 2935:11:37, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 2913:11:20, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 2890:19:14, 20 July 2014 (UTC) 2869:03:48, 14 July 2014 (UTC) 2854:02:30, 11 July 2014 (UTC) 2832:01:55, 11 July 2014 (UTC) 2690:17:12, 19 July 2014 (UTC) 2672:17:07, 19 July 2014 (UTC) 2648:16:41, 19 July 2014 (UTC) 2617:15:26, 19 July 2014 (UTC) 2588:22:02, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 2529:11:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 2503:syntax highlighter gadget 2492:01:01, 18 July 2014 (UTC) 2461:-status according to the 2437:01:41, 16 July 2014 (UTC) 2406:-status according to the 2278:01:26, 27 June 2014 (UTC) 2264:00:41, 27 June 2014 (UTC) 2250:23:44, 26 June 2014 (UTC) 2222:22:52, 26 June 2014 (UTC) 2203:22:33, 26 June 2014 (UTC) 2184:12:41, 26 June 2014 (UTC) 2122:11:55, 23 June 2014 (UTC) 2102:11:51, 23 June 2014 (UTC) 2085:22:00, 18 June 2014 (UTC) 2054:-status according to the 2029:03:19, 18 June 2014 (UTC) 2005:02:30, 18 June 2014 (UTC) 1799:, and things like that. - 1716:13:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC) 1698:20:48, 1 April 2014 (UTC) 1677:19:57, 1 April 2014 (UTC) 3805:: OK, also if you go to 3618:has been placed on hold 2981:to get further input. -- 2820:House at 249 Main Street 2793:15:19, 8 July 2014 (UTC) 2773:15:16, 8 July 2014 (UTC) 2759:13:31, 8 July 2014 (UTC) 2735:05:32, 8 July 2014 (UTC) 2381:20:42, 9 July 2014 (UTC) 2366:00:40, 9 July 2014 (UTC) 2338:14:56, 4 July 2014 (UTC) 2310:04:02, 4 July 2014 (UTC) 2290:User talk:142.197.84.109 1987:21:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 1963:15:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 1924:18:29, 4 June 2014 (UTC) 1904:18:17, 4 June 2014 (UTC) 1890:18:40, 3 June 2014 (UTC) 1875:18:17, 3 June 2014 (UTC) 1854:18:08, 3 June 2014 (UTC) 1834:21:51, 31 May 2014 (UTC) 1809:21:35, 31 May 2014 (UTC) 936:Okay, I'd be happy to.-- 428:Chamber of Commerce-like 422:Briarcliff Manor article 2816:House at 3 Crown Street 1908:Alright, well thanks!-- 1476:According to the source 956:Great, thanks so much! 3671:Epicgenius's talk page 3667: 3346:User:Ɱ/Thomas Peterffy 3119:Did you know talk page 3080:Best Thing I Never Had 2899:For future reference, 2702:Hawthorne vs. Eastview 2400:Scarborough Day School 2393:Scarborough Day School 1608: 3666: 3634:Message delivered by 3626:good article criteria 3476:Message delivered by 2569:Message delivered by 2473:Message delivered by 2418:Message delivered by 2165:Message delivered by 2066:Message delivered by 1607: 42:of past discussions. 3078:'s music video for " 2810:Westchester, but in 1564:alf laylah wa laylah 1341:Briarcliff Revisited 1230:Briarcliff Manor too 1213:opt-out instructions 792:this newspaper story 126:opt-out instructions 3848:On the commonscat: 3614:you nominated as a 3115:the statistics page 2549:you nominated as a 2507:<a href=...: --> 2145:you nominated as a 1612:WWB Too's talk page 1195:fix with Dab solver 108:fix with Dab solver 3682:remove this notice 3668: 3460:you nominated for 2632:Westchester County 2561:Talk:Walter W. Law 2457:you nominated for 2402:you nominated for 2050:you nominated for 1840:Valhalla, New York 1793:#wikipedia-en-help 1623:remove this notice 1609: 1203:• Join us at the 988:unreliable sources 800:close paraphrasing 479:GOCE January drive 338:content is fine. 116:• Join us at the 3829:Hammond House pic 3803:User:Ohnoitsjamie 3642: 3484: 3154:Sanford Bernstein 3125: 3124: 3112: 2577: 2481: 2426: 2173: 2074: 1208: 169:History of Boston 121: 87: 86: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3873: 3863: 3858: 3820: 3815: 3807:the YouTube page 3791: 3753: 3748: 3732: 3727: 3685: 3633: 3623: 3586: 3581: 3563:LawrencePrincipe 3559: 3554: 3542: 3537: 3529:LawrencePrincipe 3515:LawrencePrincipe 3513:from GA status. 3475: 3473: 3420: 3415: 3378: 3373: 3343: 3303: 3298: 3257: 3252: 3211: 3206: 3098: 3082:" was filmed at 3051: 3044: 3010: 3005: 2965: 2960: 2932: 2927: 2926: 2851: 2846: 2845: 2790: 2785: 2784: 2756: 2751: 2750: 2687: 2682: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2656: 2645: 2640: 2624:Briarcliff Manor 2614: 2610: 2606: 2601: 2568: 2558: 2515: 2508: 2472: 2470: 2417: 2415: 2335: 2330: 2329: 2321: 2247: 2242: 2241: 2164: 2154: 2119: 2114: 2113: 2065: 2063: 2026: 2021: 2020: 1984: 1979: 1978: 1921: 1916: 1915: 1872: 1867: 1866: 1831: 1826: 1825: 1798: 1794: 1752: 1747: 1746: 1695: 1690: 1689: 1660:Talk:Thunderbird 1626: 1590: 1585: 1584: 1524: 1519: 1518: 1461: 1456: 1455: 1423: 1384: 1379: 1378: 1328: 1323: 1322: 1306: 1297: 1284: 1279: 1278: 1263: 1258: 1257: 1198: 1191:check to confirm 1143: 1138: 1137: 1109: 1104: 1103: 1078: 1073: 1072: 1025: 1020: 1019: 949: 944: 943: 892: 887: 886: 870: 861: 844: 839: 838: 817: 808: 773: 768: 767: 751: 742: 724: 719: 718: 699: 690: 669: 664: 663: 638: 629: 623:. All the best, 594: 589: 588: 568: 563: 562: 541: 532: 518: 513: 512: 496: 487: 470: 465: 464: 446: 437: 411: 406: 405: 366: 361: 360: 322: 317: 316: 273: 268: 267: 111: 104:check to confirm 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3881: 3880: 3876: 3875: 3874: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3861: 3854: 3831: 3818: 3811: 3789: 3783: 3751: 3744: 3730: 3723: 3704: 3686: 3675: 3660: 3638:, on behalf of 3608: 3584: 3577: 3557: 3550: 3540: 3533: 3511:Knowledge (XXG) 3506:Knowledge (XXG) 3502: 3480:, on behalf of 3454: 3418: 3411: 3389: 3376: 3369: 3337: 3316: 3301: 3294: 3268: 3255: 3248: 3222: 3209: 3202: 3176: 3157: 3140: 3128:The DYK project 3042: 3023: 3008: 3001: 2963: 2956: 2930: 2922: 2921: 2897: 2849: 2841: 2840: 2788: 2780: 2779: 2754: 2746: 2745: 2704: 2685: 2678: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2654: 2643: 2636: 2628:the first hotel 2612: 2608: 2604: 2599: 2573:, on behalf of 2543: 2514:</font : --> 2513: 2506: 2499: 2477:, on behalf of 2451: 2422:, on behalf of 2396: 2350:New York Subway 2346: 2333: 2325: 2324: 2315: 2294: 2245: 2237: 2236: 2210: 2191: 2169:, on behalf of 2139: 2117: 2109: 2108: 2070:, on behalf of 2044: 2024: 2016: 2015: 1995: 1982: 1974: 1973: 1938: 1919: 1911: 1910: 1870: 1862: 1861: 1842: 1829: 1821: 1820: 1796: 1792: 1789: 1750: 1742: 1741: 1693: 1685: 1684: 1656: 1627: 1616: 1601: 1588: 1580: 1579: 1559: 1522: 1514: 1513: 1459: 1451: 1450: 1419: 1416: 1382: 1374: 1373: 1343: 1326: 1318: 1317: 1304: 1295: 1282: 1274: 1273: 1261: 1253: 1252: 1232: 1205:DPL WikiProject 1179: 1141: 1133: 1132: 1107: 1099: 1098: 1076: 1068: 1067: 1023: 1015: 1014: 980: 947: 939: 938: 911:Blackboard Inc. 907: 890: 882: 881: 868: 859: 842: 834: 833: 815: 806: 771: 763: 762: 749: 740: 722: 714: 713: 697: 688: 667: 659: 658: 636: 627: 592: 584: 583: 566: 558: 557: 539: 530: 516: 508: 507: 494: 485: 468: 460: 459: 444: 435: 424: 409: 401: 400: 377: 364: 356: 355: 335: 320: 312: 311: 271: 263: 262: 145: 118:DPL WikiProject 92: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3879: 3877: 3869: 3868: 3830: 3827: 3826: 3825: 3782: 3779: 3778: 3777: 3776: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3703: 3700: 3676:Message added 3674: 3661: 3659: 3656: 3607: 3603:nomination of 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3501: 3500:Did you notice 3498: 3453: 3449:nomination of 3443: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3388: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3336: 3331: 3315: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3267: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3221: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3175: 3172: 3156: 3151: 3139: 3136: 3123: 3122: 3052: 3041: 3038: 3022: 3017: 3016: 3015: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2896: 2895:Third opinions 2893: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2703: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2542: 2538:nomination of 2532: 2498: 2495: 2450: 2446:nomination of 2440: 2395: 2391:nomination of 2385: 2384: 2383: 2345: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2293: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2209: 2206: 2190: 2187: 2138: 2134:nomination of 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2043: 2039:nomination of 2033: 2032: 2031: 1994: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1937: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1841: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1788: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1655: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1617:Message added 1615: 1602: 1600: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1558: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1479: 1472: 1448:I'm missing.-- 1415: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1342: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1268: 1231: 1228: 1187:The Enterprise 1178: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 979: 976: 975: 974: 973: 972: 906: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 573: 423: 420: 419: 418: 417: 416: 376: 373: 372: 371: 334: 331: 330: 329: 328: 327: 304: 303: 302: 301: 279: 278: 248: 247: 200: 199: 194: 193: 192: 191: 184: 183: 179: 178: 177: 176: 161: 160: 144: 141: 91: 88: 85: 84: 79: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3878: 3867: 3864: 3859: 3857: 3851: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3844: 3840: 3836: 3828: 3824: 3821: 3816: 3814: 3808: 3804: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3798: 3795: 3794: 3792: 3780: 3772: 3768: 3764: 3759: 3758: 3757: 3754: 3749: 3747: 3741: 3738: 3737: 3736: 3733: 3728: 3726: 3720: 3719: 3718: 3717: 3713: 3709: 3701: 3699: 3698: 3694: 3690: 3683: 3679: 3672: 3665: 3657: 3655: 3654: 3650: 3646: 3641: 3637: 3631: 3627: 3622: 3617: 3613: 3606: 3602: 3598: 3590: 3587: 3582: 3580: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3568: 3564: 3560: 3555: 3553: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3543: 3538: 3536: 3530: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3520: 3516: 3512: 3507: 3499: 3497: 3496: 3492: 3488: 3483: 3479: 3472: 3467: 3463: 3459: 3452: 3448: 3444: 3438: 3434: 3430: 3426: 3425: 3424: 3421: 3416: 3414: 3408: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3386: 3382: 3379: 3374: 3372: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3359: 3355: 3351: 3347: 3342: 3335: 3332: 3330: 3329: 3325: 3321: 3314: 3311: 3307: 3304: 3299: 3297: 3291: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3273: 3265: 3261: 3258: 3253: 3251: 3245: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3227: 3219: 3215: 3212: 3207: 3205: 3199: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3189: 3185: 3181: 3173: 3171: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3155: 3152: 3150: 3149: 3146: 3145:TheCatalyst31 3137: 3135: 3133: 3129: 3120: 3116: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3081: 3077: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3063: 3062: 3057: 3053: 3050: 3046: 3045: 3039: 3037: 3036: 3032: 3028: 3027:Doug Coldwell 3021: 3018: 3014: 3011: 3006: 3004: 2998: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2969: 2966: 2961: 2959: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2947: 2943: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2933: 2928: 2925: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2894: 2892: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2852: 2847: 2844: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2813: 2808: 2805: 2794: 2791: 2786: 2783: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2757: 2752: 2749: 2742: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2732: 2728: 2724: 2720: 2715: 2713: 2709: 2701: 2691: 2688: 2683: 2681: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2670: 2662: 2657: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2646: 2641: 2639: 2633: 2629: 2625: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2615: 2607: 2602: 2596: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2576: 2572: 2566: 2562: 2557: 2552: 2548: 2547:Walter W. Law 2541: 2540:Walter W. Law 2537: 2533: 2531: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2517: 2510: 2504: 2496: 2494: 2493: 2489: 2485: 2480: 2476: 2469: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2455:Walter W. Law 2449: 2448:Walter W. Law 2445: 2441: 2439: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2425: 2421: 2414: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2394: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2343: 2339: 2336: 2331: 2328: 2319: 2318:Backendgaming 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2302:Backendgaming 2299: 2291: 2287: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2248: 2243: 2240: 2233: 2229: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2207: 2205: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2188: 2186: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2172: 2168: 2162: 2158: 2153: 2148: 2144: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2123: 2120: 2115: 2112: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2100: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2073: 2069: 2062: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2027: 2022: 2019: 2012: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2003: 2000: 1993:Good Articles 1992: 1988: 1985: 1980: 1977: 1970: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1960: 1956: 1955:206.71.252.18 1951: 1948: 1947: 1941: 1935: 1925: 1922: 1917: 1914: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1887: 1883: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1873: 1868: 1865: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1839: 1835: 1832: 1827: 1824: 1817: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1797:#wikipedia-en 1786: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1753: 1748: 1745: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1696: 1691: 1688: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1661: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1613: 1606: 1598: 1594: 1591: 1586: 1583: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1556: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1525: 1520: 1517: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1480: 1477: 1473: 1470: 1469: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1462: 1457: 1454: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1426: 1422: 1413: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1385: 1380: 1377: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1349: 1340: 1332: 1329: 1324: 1321: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1285: 1280: 1277: 1269: 1267: 1264: 1259: 1256: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1236:Lightbreather 1229: 1227: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1209: 1206: 1202: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1176: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1144: 1139: 1136: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1110: 1105: 1102: 1096:verifiable.-- 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1082: 1079: 1074: 1071: 1064: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1045: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1026: 1021: 1018: 1011: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 992:Walter W. Law 989: 985: 977: 971: 967: 963: 959: 955: 954: 953: 950: 945: 942: 935: 934: 933: 932: 928: 924: 920: 916: 915:the Talk page 912: 904: 896: 893: 888: 885: 878: 877: 876: 873: 872: 871: 864: 863: 862: 854: 850: 849: 848: 845: 840: 837: 830: 826: 825: 824: 823: 820: 819: 818: 811: 810: 809: 801: 797: 793: 777: 774: 769: 766: 759: 758: 757: 754: 753: 752: 745: 744: 743: 735: 730: 729: 728: 725: 720: 717: 710: 707: 706: 705: 702: 701: 700: 693: 692: 691: 683: 679: 675: 674: 673: 670: 665: 662: 655: 651: 647: 646: 645: 644: 641: 640: 639: 632: 631: 630: 622: 618: 614: 598: 595: 590: 587: 579: 574: 572: 569: 564: 561: 554: 549: 548: 547: 544: 543: 542: 535: 534: 533: 524: 523: 522: 519: 514: 511: 504: 503: 502: 499: 498: 497: 490: 489: 488: 480: 476: 475: 474: 471: 466: 463: 455: 454: 453: 452: 449: 448: 447: 440: 439: 438: 429: 421: 415: 412: 407: 404: 396: 395: 394: 393: 392: 391: 387: 383: 375:Juniper Ledge 374: 370: 367: 362: 359: 352: 351: 350: 349: 345: 341: 332: 326: 323: 318: 315: 308: 307: 306: 305: 300: 296: 292: 288: 283: 282: 281: 280: 277: 274: 269: 266: 259: 255: 250: 249: 244: 239: 238: 237: 236: 232: 228: 224: 218: 217: 213: 209: 205: 196: 195: 188: 187: 186: 185: 181: 180: 174: 170: 165: 164: 163: 162: 157: 156: 155: 153: 148: 142: 140: 139: 135: 131: 127: 122: 119: 115: 109: 105: 101: 97: 89: 83: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3855: 3832: 3812: 3786: 3784: 3745: 3724: 3705: 3687: 3616:good article 3610:The article 3609: 3578: 3551: 3534: 3503: 3455: 3427:No problem! 3412: 3390: 3370: 3338: 3317: 3295: 3272:James Speyer 3269: 3266:James Speyer 3249: 3226:James Speyer 3223: 3220:James Speyer 3203: 3180:James Speyer 3177: 3174:James Speyer 3158: 3141: 3126: 3109:daily totals 3090: 3083: 3073: 3066: 3065: 3061:Did you know 3059: 3056:29 July 2014 3024: 3002: 2976: 2957: 2923: 2898: 2875: 2842: 2806: 2801: 2781: 2747: 2716: 2711: 2705: 2679: 2637: 2551:good article 2545:The article 2544: 2518: 2511: 2500: 2452: 2397: 2354:My talk page 2347: 2326: 2295: 2238: 2211: 2192: 2147:good article 2141:The article 2140: 2110: 2045: 2017: 1996: 1975: 1952: 1949: 1942: 1939: 1912: 1863: 1843: 1822: 1811:Newyorkadam 1790: 1743: 1686: 1657: 1632:article Talk 1581: 1560: 1515: 1452: 1427: 1417: 1375: 1347: 1344: 1319: 1303: 1302: 1294: 1293: 1275: 1254: 1233: 1210: 1180: 1134: 1100: 1069: 1043: 1041: 1033: 1016: 981: 940: 908: 883: 867: 866: 858: 857: 835: 814: 813: 805: 804: 788: 764: 748: 747: 739: 738: 715: 696: 695: 687: 686: 682:WP:VOLUNTEER 660: 635: 634: 626: 625: 609: 585: 559: 538: 537: 529: 528: 509: 493: 492: 484: 483: 461: 443: 442: 434: 433: 425: 402: 378: 357: 336: 313: 264: 219: 201: 151: 149: 146: 123: 93: 65: 43: 37: 3835:Daniel Case 3702:Westchester 3645:TheQ Editor 3640:TheQ Editor 3487:TheQ Editor 3482:TheQ Editor 2882:Daniel Case 2861:Daniel Case 2824:Daniel Case 2765:Daniel Case 2727:Daniel Case 2565:nominate it 2553:has passed 2161:nominate it 2149:has passed 1969:Guypasadena 1953:guypasadena 1896:Magnolia677 1882:Magnolia677 1846:Magnolia677 1816:Newyorkadam 1801:Newyorkadam 650:WP:NAMECAPS 382:Daniel Case 243:WP:SIZERULE 198:manageable. 159:settlement. 36:This is an 18:User talk:Ɱ 3689:Epicgenius 3680:. You can 3105:live views 3101:here's how 3089:(pictured) 2723:New Castle 2719:Catt House 2580:CorporateM 2575:CorporateM 2484:CorporateM 2479:CorporateM 2288:Regarding 1621:. You can 1599:Briafcliff 1215:. Thanks, 984:verifiable 978:Walter Law 709:Miniapolis 128:. Thanks, 3350:WP:NFCC#9 3334:WP:NFCC#9 3074:... that 2356:. Thanks! 2344:Reversion 2189:Help desk 2176:Peripitus 2171:Peripitus 2096:Peripitus 2077:Peripitus 2072:Peripitus 2011:Peripitus 1999:Peripitus 1761:ChrisPond 1723:ChrisPond 1704:ChrisPond 1665:ChrisPond 1533:ChrisPond 1495:ChrisPond 1430:ChrisPond 1199:Read the 1044:can check 958:ChrisPond 919:ChrisPond 287:ChrisPond 223:ChrisPond 204:ChrisPond 112:Read the 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 72:Archive 3 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 3790:itsJamie 3763:Onel5969 3740:Onel5969 3708:Onel5969 3658:Talkback 3466:criteria 3387:Comments 3138:Dellwood 3132:nominate 2997:McGeddon 2983:McGeddon 2979:WP:NPOVN 2942:McGeddon 2905:McGeddon 2708:ZIP Code 2521:McGeddon 2463:criteria 2408:criteria 2232:User:Ɱ/u 2208:Userpage 2056:criteria 1663:Cheers! 654:WP:NFCCP 621:Ossining 617:MOS:CAPS 3636:Legobot 3478:Legobot 3429:URDNEXT 3407:URDNEXT 3393:URDNEXT 3354:Stefan2 3320:P123ct1 3161:Bearian 3076:Beyoncé 2878:WT:NRHP 2571:Legobot 2475:Legobot 2429:Zanimum 2424:Zanimum 2420:Legobot 2373:Staglit 2358:Staglit 2270:URDNEXT 2256:URDNEXT 2228:URDNEXT 2214:URDNEXT 2167:Legobot 2068:Legobot 1636:WWB Too 1394:WWB Too 1353:WWB Too 1348:in toto 1217:DPL bot 1153:Kraxler 1118:Kraxler 1063:Kraxler 1050:Kraxler 1010:Kraxler 996:Kraxler 796:WP:PLAG 147:Hey ɱ, 130:DPL bot 100:Private 39:archive 3862:(talk) 3819:(talk) 3781:Videos 3752:(talk) 3731:(talk) 3585:(talk) 3558:(talk) 3541:(talk) 3419:(talk) 3377:(talk) 3302:(talk) 3290:algocu 3276:algocu 3256:(talk) 3244:algocu 3230:algocu 3210:(talk) 3198:algocu 3184:algocu 3025:QPQ?-- 3009:(talk) 2964:(talk) 2931:(talk) 2850:(talk) 2812:Putnam 2789:(talk) 2755:(talk) 2741:Daniel 2721:is in 2686:(talk) 2644:(talk) 2559:; see 2334:(talk) 2246:(talk) 2155:; see 2118:(talk) 2099:(Talk) 2025:(talk) 2002:(Talk) 1983:(talk) 1920:(talk) 1871:(talk) 1830:(talk) 1751:(talk) 1694:(talk) 1589:(talk) 1523:(talk) 1460:(talk) 1383:(talk) 1327:(talk) 1305:apolis 1283:(talk) 1262:(talk) 1142:(talk) 1108:(talk) 1077:(talk) 1024:(talk) 948:(talk) 891:(talk) 869:apolis 843:(talk) 816:apolis 772:(talk) 750:apolis 734:WP:OWN 723:(talk) 698:apolis 678:WP:OWN 668:(talk) 637:apolis 593:(talk) 567:(talk) 540:apolis 517:(talk) 495:apolis 469:(talk) 445:apolis 410:(talk) 365:(talk) 340:Jytdog 321:(talk) 272:(talk) 173:Boston 3599:Your 3445:Your 2901:WP:3O 2534:Your 2442:Your 2387:Your 2195:Bbb23 2130:Your 2035:Your 613:briar 578:Brier 333:blech 167:e.g, 16:< 3839:talk 3788:OhNo 3767:talk 3712:talk 3693:talk 3649:talk 3567:talk 3519:talk 3491:talk 3433:talk 3397:talk 3358:talk 3352:. -- 3324:talk 3313:ISIS 3280:talk 3234:talk 3188:talk 3165:talk 3031:talk 2987:talk 2946:talk 2909:talk 2886:talk 2865:talk 2828:talk 2818:and 2769:talk 2731:talk 2595:here 2584:talk 2525:talk 2488:talk 2433:talk 2377:talk 2362:talk 2306:talk 2274:talk 2260:talk 2218:talk 2199:talk 2180:talk 2081:talk 1959:talk 1940:Hi, 1900:talk 1886:talk 1850:talk 1805:talk 1765:Talk 1727:Talk 1708:Talk 1669:Talk 1640:Talk 1568:talk 1537:Talk 1499:Talk 1434:Talk 1398:Talk 1357:Talk 1296:Mini 1240:talk 1221:talk 1157:talk 1122:talk 1054:talk 1038:WP:V 1000:talk 962:Talk 923:Talk 860:Mini 807:Mini 741:Mini 689:Mini 628:Mini 531:Mini 486:Mini 436:Mini 386:talk 344:talk 291:Talk 258:here 256:and 254:here 227:Talk 208:Talk 190:bit? 152:huge 134:talk 3852:.-- 3643:-- 3485:-- 3054:On 2807:has 2804:NPS 2668:007 2655:Mat 2630:in 2613:007 2600:Mat 2578:-- 2482:-- 2427:-- 2174:-- 2075:-- 1787:Sup 1769:COI 1731:COI 1712:COI 1673:COI 1644:COI 1541:COI 1503:COI 1438:COI 1402:COI 1361:COI 1201:FAQ 1040:: " 1034:not 966:COI 927:COI 295:COI 231:COI 212:COI 114:FAQ 3841:) 3769:) 3714:) 3695:) 3651:) 3601:GA 3569:) 3521:) 3493:) 3468:. 3462:GA 3447:GA 3435:) 3399:) 3360:) 3326:) 3282:) 3236:) 3190:) 3167:) 3107:, 3103:, 3058:, 3033:) 2989:) 2948:) 2940:-- 2911:) 2888:) 2867:) 2830:) 2771:) 2733:) 2712:is 2660:ty 2605:ty 2586:) 2536:GA 2527:) 2490:) 2465:. 2459:GA 2444:GA 2435:) 2410:. 2404:GA 2389:GA 2379:) 2364:) 2308:) 2276:) 2262:) 2220:) 2201:) 2182:) 2132:GA 2083:) 2058:. 2052:GA 2037:GA 1961:) 1902:) 1888:) 1852:) 1807:) 1795:, 1771:) 1767:· 1733:) 1729:· 1714:) 1710:· 1675:) 1671:· 1646:) 1642:· 1634:. 1570:) 1543:) 1539:· 1505:) 1501:· 1440:) 1436:· 1404:) 1400:· 1371:-- 1363:) 1359:· 1242:) 1223:) 1193:| 1159:) 1124:) 1056:) 1002:) 968:) 964:· 929:) 925:· 581:-- 388:) 346:) 297:) 293:· 233:) 229:· 214:) 210:· 136:) 106:| 3856:ɱ 3837:( 3813:ɱ 3765:( 3746:ɱ 3725:ɱ 3710:( 3691:( 3673:. 3647:( 3579:ɱ 3565:( 3552:ɱ 3535:ɱ 3517:( 3489:( 3431:( 3413:ɱ 3395:( 3371:ɱ 3356:( 3322:( 3296:ɱ 3278:( 3250:ɱ 3232:( 3204:ɱ 3186:( 3163:( 3130:( 3121:. 3111:) 3099:( 3091:? 3029:( 3003:ɱ 2985:( 2958:ɱ 2944:( 2924:ɱ 2907:( 2884:( 2863:( 2843:ɱ 2826:( 2782:ɱ 2767:( 2748:ɱ 2729:( 2680:ɱ 2664:. 2638:ɱ 2609:. 2582:( 2523:( 2486:( 2431:( 2375:( 2360:( 2327:ɱ 2320:: 2316:@ 2304:( 2272:( 2258:( 2239:ɱ 2216:( 2197:( 2178:( 2111:ɱ 2079:( 2018:ɱ 1976:ɱ 1957:( 1913:ɱ 1898:( 1884:( 1864:ɱ 1848:( 1823:ɱ 1803:( 1763:( 1744:ɱ 1725:( 1706:( 1687:ɱ 1667:( 1638:( 1614:. 1582:ɱ 1566:( 1535:( 1516:ɱ 1497:( 1453:ɱ 1432:( 1396:( 1376:ɱ 1355:( 1320:ɱ 1276:ɱ 1255:ɱ 1238:( 1219:( 1207:. 1189:( 1155:( 1135:ɱ 1120:( 1101:ɱ 1070:ɱ 1052:( 1017:ɱ 998:( 960:( 941:ɱ 921:( 884:ɱ 836:ɱ 765:ɱ 716:ɱ 661:ɱ 586:ɱ 560:ɱ 510:ɱ 462:ɱ 403:ɱ 384:( 358:ɱ 342:( 314:ɱ 289:( 265:ɱ 225:( 206:( 132:( 120:. 102:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index