432:
31:
871:, so no consensus is required to make such uncontroversial edits to an article. "All I saw was that you removed a reference. This is not a good idea except if you have consensus on the talk page, which you didn't have." doesn't make any sense at all, since consensus is not required for making such improvements to an article. If you have any questions or need any help, feel free to message me.
672:
114:
603:
In your second edit, you removed relevant terms and linking (apex predator) preventing others from being able to do further research on that portion of the premise at hand. This, though I know it wasn't your intent, dumbs down and damages the article. Had the linking not been provided, an explanation
196:
I have fully made the Office 2007 comparison sheet extensive and had made it look much better. It shows two charts of information in one and I made sure that all of the information is accurate and correct by looking at the previous chart. I used the formatting from the Office 2010 comparison chart.
862:
I've removed the warning on the talk page. Also, there's nothing to warn about, especially regarding civility, as 108.7.7.6 messaged you in good faith asking you to clarify your revert. On the other hand, stating that you will issue another warning in unnecessarily bitey, so I wouldn't recommend you
794:
If it wasn't a mistake, you would have decided that my two edits were objectionable in LESS THAN ONE MINUTE. Surely you usually give such things more thought than that. Also, you didn't give edit comments explaining your reasons for revert, something experienced editors like yourself usually do,
613:
The tool MrRoot used reverts all edits - not just the unconstructive one (#2). I'm sure he'll explain his rationale for the revert and the message he left you when he has time. Hope that gets you started though on some ideas on how to re-contribute the information in a better fashion. Best, Robert
506:
Hello, I was wondering that you could help me with an assignment my english teacher left to us. We have to search an article and look what's wrong in it to correct it, but i can't find anything that i could barely use. I checked the gorillaz article and it seems alright, but it's missing all tour
155:
Hello, user: Mr. R00t i had been trying to contact you in order for you to check a section i had wrote about the celebration of the mexican independence in the northern states of Mexico such as coahuila, zacatecs, san luis and others. So i will be glad if you check it and suggest me what should i
1014:
I've removed your request for an editor review from the main page, as your last request was made less than a month ago. In order to ensure that everyone that requests a review be reviewed in a timely manner, requests made within 3 months of each other may be removed. Of course, you are more than
802:
My first edit was clearly a copy edit correcting an obviously awkward construction. In the second edit, I took the time to check the reference and found it and the whole sentence to be inapplicable. The second edit could be legitimately argued, but you didn't make any argument in your edit
1252:
Hello , my and another class mate are writing an article about "Marketing in Mexico". It would be nice, since you seem to have some experience in the
Knowledge (XXG) Worls, if you could go the next days through it to help us to correct the different details and to give us your opinion about
863:
doing so in the future. Regarding using the automated tool, it is important to note that the user is still responsible for checking the edit to see if it is indeed vandalism. While mistakes might be made, it's important to fix them as soon as someone points them out. Now, the edit itself
386:
with messages that are clearly at the time completely moot, which messages are designed to instruct new users, and declining deletion on articles which so obviously warrant deletion under asserted or under other valid grounds you should instead correct the tag yourself, such as with a
607:
In your third edit, you already provided a statement above and a source to support it. The extra statement was probably not necessary; and though that may not be reason enough to disclude it, the statement could have either used some rewording or a better method of including
822:
warning for incivility FYI. When using an automated browser to patrol edits you don't have the option to enter an edit summary. All I saw was that you removed a reference. This is not a good idea except if you have consensus on the talk page, which you didn't have.
701:
Okay. I'm aware of that and have already reviewed such policies. Please refrain from template'ing the regulars. I realize that I've made some mistakes recently and have actually been thinking of requesting my rollback permissions removed or at least re-evaluated.
219:
Ahh, apologies. I was only looking at a single diff which showed a very large piece of information being deleted. It did not show any other edits. What's more, it hit an edit filter which marked it as "Probable
Vandalism". Sorry for the misunderstanding,
896:
a good idea unless the reference is a) incorrect (shown through discussion on the talk page) b) not conforming to one of our policies (also through consensus on talk page). Basically you should have consensus except for removing link spam.
795:
unless the edit is made by mistake. You also sent some kind of warning to my (IP) talk page calling my edits "non constructive" when a half of a second's glance would see that they were not. Again, most editors only do this kind of thing
722:
Wow, that's a level of self-honesty and self-restraint that's very refreshing to see (much respect for that). With that in mind, I'd hope you refrain from making such a request and instead use the knowledge gained more effectively.Ā :-)
643:
Thanks Robert. Basically I reverted for the reasons he said above. I also saw in edit #2 that you didn't add a source or use an edit summary. Both of these are usually things that make you look up from your keyboard and revert.
604:
of the term (apex predator) or inclusion of the link to the term (which was there) would have been a better method. Since the term was already linked to the page on apex predators, it (IMHO) probably should have been left alone.
146:
I am a boy who would like to learn how to use
Knowledge (XXG) properly. I've always attempted to contribute but I can never seem to get it right. Could you mentor me please? -DamonĀ ;) 00:11, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
461:
hi, thank you for snding me a message, yes i will like you to help me with my writting in
English. Right now we are working on chosing a topic for our final project and writte it in Knowledge (XXG), any ideas.
1189:
803:
comments, leaving the impression of mere impetuousness on your part. That may not be the case, but it sure looks that way when edit comments are blank and when a "knee jerk" reaction is made so quickly.
1205:
1181:
1213:
1197:
1165:
197:
I would like it if that edit could be left, as I have made both 2007 and the 2010 office pages great by adding more information and fixing false information. Thank you. Elliot Thomas.
1173:
929:. If an explaning why a revert was reverted constitutes incivility, then someone needs to warn every single user on Knowledge (XXG). The Only person here who is not being civil is you.
680:
449:
943:
Best bet, applogize, forget about it, and move on. Continue, and I'll give you a well deserved incivility warning, or maybe just leave it up to the folks at
1230:
383:
107:
Hello, I was wondering if you could adopt me on wikipedia, to know how to use it properly, not just for saving my ass on hwk. Could you? Hugs.
1094:
246:
204:
740:
631:
332:
285:
1221:
575:
523:
675:
Welcome to
Knowledge (XXG). Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you
539:
article as I find them fascinating. All I can really say is choose whatever interests you and make sure you cite sources. Cheers, ā«
568:
excuse me, why did you revert my edit? I provided references to the information. Do people now go about and delete as they wish?
917:
Netalarm is right in every aspect. You were bitey. You warned an IP user for vandalism for removing a source, IN GOOD FAITH.
809:
1273:
507:
dates, a dvd that came out wich is a documental and more webpage references. Could i use that or not? Thank you and regards!
592:
391:. If you have any questions or require any assistance, please don't hesitate to drop them on my talk page. Cheers! Ā :-)
94:
86:
1078:
81:
69:
64:
59:
1226:
38:
315:
Yeah, I know... just like being polite - and noticed similar interests (hence grabbing some of the UBX's)Ā :-) Rob
1090:
791:. Given your normally reasonable editing patterns, I can only expect that your revert was some kind of mistake.
1145:
1082:
481:. A company is a great idea! Just let me know what your writing about so that I can watch it and help you out.
478:
250:
208:
1074:
571:
511:
242:
200:
1104:
1019:
1141:
969:
579:
519:
467:
438:
431:
1238:
342:
Okay. I didn't see your signature and assumed you were a new-ish user instead of an experienced one.
1140:
Thanks for your helpful tips regarding my question to reinstate my deleted page. I appreciate it!
388:
1258:
1026:
872:
813:
375:
368:
1303:
1126:
1051:
992:
909:
851:
835:
762:
725:
714:
656:
616:
551:
493:
417:
354:
317:
308:
270:
232:
183:
133:
47:
17:
976:" is not in the least bit constructive. Telling me that you've noticed that I haven't been AGF
1100:
839:
I apologize for my inappropriate behavior. Comments below are correct. My sincere apologies. ā«
1174:
Good faith vs. bad faith, climate change, court citations, weirdest medieval fact, brief news
944:
937:
1281:
1086:
1066:
515:
463:
161:
922:
918:
676:
1234:
1070:
268:
Great userpage and userboxes!!! I think I'm going to borrow a few of the UBX's. Best, Rob
379:
1276:
and e-mail it to Sage. We will get back to you soon about your application. Thank you!
1254:
392:
1292:
1115:
1040:
981:
968:
ANowlin, please remain calm. YELLING is not appreciated in the least bit. Please see
898:
840:
824:
751:
703:
645:
540:
482:
406:
343:
297:
221:
172:
122:
121:- just so you know, when you post on a talk page you should sign comments with ~~~~.
1305:
1285:
1262:
1242:
1149:
1129:
1108:
1054:
1033:
995:
963:
955:
912:
879:
854:
765:
745:
717:
695:
687:
659:
636:
583:
554:
527:
495:
471:
445:
419:
399:
382:
and supported squarely by the fact that they are not sourced. Further, instead of
356:
337:
310:
290:
254:
234:
212:
185:
165:
135:
1277:
1065:
My students are now working a number of different articles in groups. These are
157:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1272:
Thank you for the interest in being an online ambassador, please fill out the
562:
1015:
welcome to display the editor review request templates on your user page (
671:
536:
865:
had a clear edit summary that explained why the reference was removed
296:
Go ahead. You don't even have to give attribution for the
Userboxen.
932:
Your "a)" and "b)" above are PARTIALLY correct. Those only apply
683:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
788:
777:
867:, so it should not have been reverted so quickly. And finally,
25:
1166:
Mike Godwin leaves the
Foundation, ArbCom election announced
452:
at any timeĀ by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
430:
1114:
Ah, I've been wondering about that. Thanks for the list. ā«
679:
while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the
535:
All of those are good ideas! Personally I'd go with the
925:. You retort with a threat of issuing a warning for
380:A7 because the claims are outrageous, incredulous
171:Sorry for the late reply, what is the article?
921:. They reverted you, and politely explained,
890:should have reached consensus on the talk page
888:. He made a possibly controversial edit which
1198:So what is being an arbitrator actually like?
8:
1214:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
1182:Nightmare on Wiki Street: WikiProject Horror
239:No problem, thank you for fixing. - Elliot
1248:group work about Sports Marketing in Mexico
1025:) to let other users know of your request.
437:Hello, 1234r00t. You have new messages at
374:FYI, I've restored the deletion request on
1253:it...thank you in advance for your help,
378:, because it is a clear candidate under
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1095:User:Oscarbrum/Epitafio De Un Asesino
806:But, I'm sure it was a mistake. Ā :-)
7:
24:
1099:Any and all help is appreciated.
670:
112:
29:
923:assumed good faith on your part
869:any editor may edit the article
816:) 04:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
367:Re: Speedy deletion contested:
1061:Update on Mexico City students
600:Always provide an edit summary
1:
1306:20:52, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
1286:17:44, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
1263:05:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
1243:00:20, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
1150:17:53, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
1130:22:30, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
1109:22:15, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
1079:Diagnostic Enterprise Method
1055:22:55, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
1034:22:44, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
996:16:31, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
980:is much more constructive. ā«
964:00:54, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
913:19:11, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
880:04:03, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
855:04:10, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
837:23:19, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
766:03:52, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
746:03:51, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
718:03:44, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
696:00:57, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
660:19:06, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
637:02:05, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
584:01:53, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
555:00:53, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
528:00:48, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
496:23:34, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
472:03:01, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
446:03:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
420:02:51, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
400:02:50, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
357:02:49, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
338:02:29, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
311:01:13, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
291:01:11, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
255:01:02, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
235:00:39, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
213:00:31, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
186:00:13, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
166:18:40, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
136:22:31, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
1322:
1268:Online ambassador interest
1222:Read this Signpost in full
1206:Case closes within 1 month
787:I reverted your revert on
1091:Bernardo Quintana Arrioja
972:. Telling me to "Cool it
970:Knowledge (XXG):HYPOCRISY
884:Netalarm, I wasn't being
1274:Application questionaire
1083:El Tepeyac National Park
479:User talk:Alpha Quadrant
1291:Alright, I'll do that.
1075:The Eyes of My Princess
892:. Removing references
439:HJ Mitchell's talk page
783:have been a mistake...
477:I saw your message at
435:
103:Hello Vegetarian dude.
1188:Features and admins:
1010:Editor review removed
934:if there is a dispute
818::A) I could give you
434:
405:You're right, sorry.
42:of past discussions.
1204:Arbitration report:
1190:The best of the week
1180:WikiProject report:
1212:Technology report:
384:templating regulars
1196:ArbCom interview:
961:
750:Thanks Robert :D ā«
693:
561:Reverted edits to
450:remove this notice
436:
18:User talk:1234r00t
1158:: 25 October 2010
953:
744:
734:
730:
685:
677:assume good faith
635:
625:
621:
593:talk page stalker
574:comment added by
531:
514:comment added by
336:
326:
322:
289:
279:
275:
245:comment added by
203:comment added by
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1313:
1301:
1164:News and notes:
1124:
1087:Alpura (company)
1067:Street marketing
1049:
1031:
1024:
1018:
990:
962:
958:
907:
877:
849:
833:
760:
736:
732:
728:
724:
712:
694:
690:
674:
654:
627:
623:
619:
615:
596:
586:
549:
530:
508:
491:
453:
415:
397:
396:
352:
328:
324:
320:
316:
306:
281:
277:
273:
269:
257:
230:
215:
192:Office 2007 Page
181:
131:
120:
116:
115:
78:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1321:
1320:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1293:
1270:
1250:
1245:
1218:
1160:
1138:
1116:
1071:PyMEs in Mexico
1063:
1041:
1027:
1022:
1016:
1012:
982:
956:
952:
899:
873:
841:
825:
785:
776:Your revert on
752:
743:
726:
704:
688:
684:
668:
646:
634:
617:
590:
569:
566:
541:
509:
504:
483:
459:
454:
443:
428:
407:
394:
393:
372:
344:
335:
318:
298:
288:
271:
266:
240:
222:
198:
194:
173:
156:change. Thanks
153:
144:
123:
113:
111:
105:
74:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1319:
1317:
1309:
1308:
1269:
1266:
1249:
1246:
1219:
1217:
1216:
1209:
1208:
1201:
1200:
1193:
1192:
1185:
1184:
1177:
1176:
1169:
1168:
1161:
1159:
1153:
1142:LeaveDogLights
1137:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1062:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1011:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
960:
941:
930:
784:
774:
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
739:
692:
667:
664:
663:
662:
640:
639:
630:
611:
610:
609:
605:
601:
565:
559:
558:
557:
503:
500:
499:
498:
458:
455:
444:Message added
442:
429:
427:
424:
423:
422:
371:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
331:
284:
265:
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
247:173.87.224.103
205:173.87.224.103
193:
190:
189:
188:
152:
149:
143:
140:
139:
138:
104:
101:
98:
97:
92:
89:
84:
79:
72:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1318:
1307:
1304:
1302:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1267:
1265:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1247:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1223:
1215:
1211:
1210:
1207:
1203:
1202:
1199:
1195:
1194:
1191:
1187:
1186:
1183:
1179:
1178:
1175:
1172:In the news:
1171:
1170:
1167:
1163:
1162:
1157:
1154:
1152:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1125:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1097:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1050:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1032:
1030:
1021:
1020:Editor_review
1009:
997:
993:
991:
989:
988:
987:
979:
975:
971:
967:
966:
965:
959:
954:
950:
946:
942:
939:
935:
931:
928:
924:
920:
916:
915:
914:
910:
908:
906:
905:
904:
895:
891:
887:
883:
882:
881:
878:
876:
870:
866:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
852:
850:
848:
847:
846:
838:
836:
834:
832:
831:
830:
821:
815:
811:
807:
804:
800:
798:
792:
790:
782:
779:
775:
767:
763:
761:
759:
758:
757:
749:
748:
747:
742:
737:
721:
720:
719:
715:
713:
711:
710:
709:
700:
699:
698:
697:
691:
686:
682:
678:
673:
665:
661:
657:
655:
653:
652:
651:
642:
641:
638:
633:
628:
612:
606:
602:
599:
598:
594:
589:
588:
587:
585:
581:
577:
573:
564:
560:
556:
552:
550:
548:
547:
546:
538:
534:
533:
532:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
501:
497:
494:
492:
490:
489:
488:
480:
476:
475:
474:
473:
469:
465:
456:
451:
447:
440:
433:
425:
421:
418:
416:
414:
413:
412:
404:
403:
402:
401:
398:
390:
385:
381:
377:
376:Chase Fleisch
370:
369:Chase Fleisch
366:
358:
355:
353:
351:
350:
349:
341:
340:
339:
334:
329:
314:
313:
312:
309:
307:
305:
304:
303:
295:
294:
293:
292:
287:
282:
263:
256:
252:
248:
244:
238:
237:
236:
233:
231:
229:
228:
227:
218:
217:
216:
214:
210:
206:
202:
191:
187:
184:
182:
180:
179:
178:
170:
169:
168:
167:
163:
159:
150:
148:
141:
137:
134:
132:
130:
129:
128:
119:
110:
109:
108:
102:
96:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
77:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1271:
1251:
1220:
1156:The Signpost
1155:
1139:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1101:Thelmadatter
1098:
1064:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1028:
1013:
985:
984:
983:
977:
973:
948:
947:. Cool it,
933:
926:
902:
901:
900:
893:
889:
885:
874:
868:
864:
844:
843:
842:
828:
827:
826:
819:
817:
808:
805:
801:
796:
793:
786:
780:
755:
754:
753:
707:
706:
705:
681:welcome page
669:
649:
648:
647:
597:A few tips:
567:
544:
543:
542:
505:
502:Hello Again.
486:
485:
484:
460:
410:
409:
408:
373:
347:
346:
345:
301:
300:
299:
267:
225:
224:
223:
195:
176:
175:
174:
154:
145:
126:
125:
124:
117:
106:
75:
43:
37:
1231:Unsubscribe
1227:Single-page
576:88.234.8.19
570:āPreceding
516:Goochinaski
510:āPreceding
464:MontseSalin
395:Thorncrag
241:āPreceding
199:āPreceding
151:Suggestions
36:This is an
1235:EdwardsBot
927:incivility
797:by mistake
563:Bull shark
448:. You can
95:ArchiveĀ 15
87:ArchiveĀ 10
1255:Lr.dinghi
1136:thank you
810:108.7.7.6
82:ArchiveĀ 9
76:ArchiveĀ 8
70:ArchiveĀ 7
65:ArchiveĀ 6
60:ArchiveĀ 5
1297:Mr. R00t
1120:Mr. R00t
1045:Mr. R00t
1029:Netalarm
986:Mr. R00t
903:Mr. R00t
875:Netalarm
845:Mr. R00t
829:Mr. R00t
756:Mr. R00t
708:Mr. R00t
650:Mr. R00t
572:unsigned
545:Mr. R00t
524:contribs
512:unsigned
487:Mr. R00t
426:Talkback
411:Mr. R00t
389:BLP PROD
348:Mr. R00t
302:Mr. R00t
243:unsigned
226:Mr. R00t
201:unsigned
177:Mr. R00t
142:Adoption
127:Mr. R00t
1039:Okay. ā«
957:ANowlin
945:WP:AN/I
938:WP:BOLD
820:another
689:ANowlin
537:Gorilla
39:archive
1278:Sadads
978:calmly
919:WP:AGF
894:is not
457:Mentor
158:C.E.Q.
886:bitey
741:CNTRB
729:OBERT
632:CNTRB
620:OBERT
333:CNTRB
321:OBERT
286:CNTRB
274:OBERT
16:<
1282:talk
1259:talk
1239:talk
1146:talk
1105:talk
1093:and
814:talk
789:Bomb
781:must
778:Bomb
733:FROM
624:FROM
580:talk
520:talk
468:talk
325:FROM
278:FROM
251:talk
209:talk
162:talk
118:Done
974:NOW
949:NOW
936:.
666:AGF
608:it.
264:Hi!
1284:)
1261:)
1241:)
1233:Ā·
1229:Ā·
1225:Ā·
1148:)
1128:ā«
1107:)
1089:,
1085:,
1081:,
1077:,
1073:,
1069:,
1053:ā«
1023:}}
1017:{{
994:ā«
911:ā«
853:ā«
799:.
764:ā«
735:LI
716:ā«
658:ā«
626:LI
582:)
553:ā«
526:)
522:ā¢
470:)
327:LI
280:LI
253:)
211:)
164:)
91:ā
1280:(
1257:(
1237:(
1144:(
1103:(
951:.
940:.
897:ā«
812:(
738:/
731:M
727:R
702:ā«
644:ā«
629:/
622:M
618:R
595:)
591:(
578:(
518:(
466:(
441:.
330:/
323:M
319:R
283:/
276:M
272:R
249:(
207:(
160:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.