1295:: The reason there was apparent confusion, is because it was not clear from the press reports whether the Govt wanted the "link" to the map on that article to be deleted (content on en-wiki), or whether they wanted the map to be deleted (content on commons). Jrogers subsequently confirmed that they wanted the map be be deleted. The Govt of India has also confirmed privately to me that all maps of India with incorrect depictions of territories and boundaries shall be automatically subject to the same legal action in the same way whenever it is brought to their attention. Because the Govt of India now issues these orders in 72 hours, even as responses to Twitter tweets as in the present instance, it is clearly necessary that WMF (not the communities) must take steps. Secondly, the mission/purpose/scope of Commons being very different from EN:WP, my arguments would obviously be very different too. Now, because I have carefully noted that my block is being carried forward till such time as any legal action I resolve concludes, and because I have not initiated any legal action so far, it seems the only course open to me is to initiate some legal actions, done grudgingly under en-wikipedia's anonymous bureaucracy duress, about the maps of India on all wikipedias / commons and get an outcome expeditiously under laws of India which the community admins couldn't care less about. and ... No, I was not trolling. cheers.
1635:, it's not. We don't consider it a joke at all, and GGS is pointing out how we react to censorship: by writing an article about it. To us it's very serious that some countries would censor WP so that their citizens couldn't get the benefit. But we don't change because of it, because that would deprive citizens of every country. As GGS points out, one of the ways we hope to prevent countries censoring us is by reporting on it. Are you actually arguing that WP should censor itself to make it more palatable to oppressive governments so that the citizens of those countries -- and all countries -- would have equitable access to bullshit?
692:
a positive way. Its not easy for legal professionals to deal with the IANAL types and sometimes we may not be as respectful and deferential to admins as Alices ought to be in
Wonderland. One the one and only occasion I made disruptive (??) 3RR edits, deliberately, I invoked the exemption and also alerted 2 experienced admins Doug Weller and Bishonen on their talk pages beforehand. I considered taking it to WP:ANI but contented myself with WP:RFP discussions instead. So I am not any kind of vandal you see. All the edits I reverted (disruptively ??) were by anon IPs and SPAs who left no edit summaries or discussed on any talk page.
1270:. This morning I read the talk page discussions over that map that occurred on several different pages. And your position totally confused me. At times, you were stating, strongly, that Knowledge can not bow to censorship. But then, a few posts later, you were predicting dire consequences if the map wasn't changed and claiming that Knowledge editors in India would be arrested. It seems like you were arguing both sides of this serious dispute which was just incredibly disruptive. I was going to block you for that alone, before the legal threats. Were you just trolling us?
888:, how is it in any way pertinent that you've only been disruptive today? You were disruptive for hours today. You have ~250 edits and almost half of them were today + disruptive. You made multiple veiled legal threats. You argued for literally hours about whether apparent wrongheaded-but-good-faith edits were "obvious vandalism" and justified edit-warring. You took drama to multiple fora. Why in the world would we want to give you a chance to give wikipedia another day like today with you?
684:, and didn't see the message from the other admins in time to respond. JRogers doesn't see my comments as any kind of legal threat as far as I can tell, and he would be the best judge of that. As regards your other link to the 300+ takedowns, EN:WP should be grateful for my expertise in such things and not treat my suggestions as a legal threat. I do these things professionally. Everyone's on a hair trigger these days. Sheesh ! When somebody here says laws are irrelevant
85:
1524:
our editing, trying to be neutral, but completely unconcerned about whether any government entity approves or disapproves of what we write. If some government entity decides to censor us in their country, that's a drag for the citizens of that country, but it doesn't in any way change how we edit. If India decided tomorrow to completely block
Knowledge, we wouldn't change anything about any of our articles in response.
172:
596:
715:
remain blocked until the action is resolved. Even if you don't threaten to take action yourself, raising it as a possibility has a chilling effect on other editors who might fear what the Indian government will do. I am declining your request. I will add that if Mr. Rogers from the WMF feels your statements are not a legal threat, they should come here to offer their views.
508:
257:
1875:
the only option being offered to me (by u:331Dot) was that I should initiate legal action so as to be unblocked once such was resolved. Please read it again. In any case how (or why) can I withdraw a legal threat which was never made ? And, can we please dispose of RegentPark's NLT example first ? My
1523:
Aghore, I'm not sure why -- maybe you're a lawyer? -- but you appear to be incorrectly interpreting what we've been telling you about enwiki's relationship to government bodies. What a government tribunal declares doesn't actually have any relation to how we edit. WMF deals with that, and we go about
1319:
I am privately informed by counsel of
Wikimedia / Knowledge INDIA that the tribunal case/s whereby my account was redacted between approx 2013 to 2019 has been closed in India on or about 13 Jan 2020 and consequently this account was restored by WMF along with a few others. I am further informed that
912:
The edits I reverted were targeted vandalism coordinated off-wiki caused by the newspaper reports. I suppose it would have been more convenient for WMNF and everybody else that nobody reverted those vandals and the merry-go-round would go on. But I did it today to defend the encyclopedia, even if you
691:
where is the Good Faith in that ? On merits:- I am not a threat to the projects and don't edit disruptively in main space. I have scrupulously refrained from editing in main space after that page was protected, as I promised. In as far as talk page edits go, I was civil throughout and contributed in
1420:
Thanks for your valued inputs. I hasten to clarify that whatever took place on this enwiki account between 2013 and 2019 was done at the instance of the aforedescribed "privately-owned organisation headquartered in the USA" and not by some anonymous pseudo-bureaucrat person hiding behind a contrived
1836:
Aghore, as
RegentsPark states, your sole activity here is not to converse with editors and admins dropping by but to compose an unblock request. Since, in your reply to me above, you talk about initiating legal action, I think you will have to withdraw all such threats if you ever want to edit here
1649:
As Tom Hagen said to Jack Woltz shortly before the horse's head was sawn off, - "I have a single client" - who are probably India's largest free-speech association (among other things). So "we" are probably more against
Censorship than you or WMF are. To take a small example - Self induced abortion
1544:
Valeree, my short response is - US citizens are privileged in that
Knowledge is highly unlikely to be blocked there, but have you considered how citizens of Turkey, China feel when there is no Knowledge ? Yes, editing at Knowledge is a privilege as RexxS says, .. for those of the privileged North !
1880:
are still unanswered, possibly because there was never any actual legal threat made by me for which I was blocked. So how can I withdraw something which I never committed ? It's Catch 22 all over again. Accordingly,, I shall await
RegentsPark's response, if any, and then compose a suitable Unblock
1327:
In such circumstances, although I was never a party in the matters between WMF INDIA, and the rogue enwiki admins involved, there is no legal action pending at the present time involving myself and
Knowledge as far as I know. Hence, I should be UNBLOCKED as this block violates the special tribunal
1111:
you still continued -- still are continuing -- to argue that it was obvious vandalism. The 3RR exemption is for vandalism that any reasonable editor would agree was vandalism. Obvious vandalism is stuff like inserting "Joe Patton is a big fat hog". The removal of a disputed map does not qualify as
916:
Incorrect. Those edits were likely good-faith edits by probably-less-than-well-informed IPs and newbs who likely were drawn here by some combination of news reports and twitter. They weren't thoughtful additions but they absolutely were not vandalism, and you continuing to call them that reaffirms
1131:
edit summary. In your eyes their edits don't constitute vandalism, in mine they do. You must understand, that there were a series of identical reverts of that link in a compressed period of time indicating persistent sockpuppetry. Had RFP been faster the situation would not have arise, If it took
1345:
The
English Knowledge is part of a privately-owned organisation headquartered in the USA. A block from Knowledge is simply a removal of the privilege previously granted to you to edit this private site. You have no legal right to edit. This block cannot violate a "special tribunal order", as the
714:
You are blocked for making legal threats; that means to be unblocked you must unequivocally withdraw those threats. If the Indian government chooses to take action against
Knowledge, that is their decision. If you asked the Indian government to do so, that initiates a legal action and you must
1699:
That's terrible, and there is no way on earth I'd conclude that the solution is to stop creating neutral articles because some oppressive government doesn't like them. I feel for that woman, and I hope she gets her license back, and if there's significant coverage in reliable sources, I would
1684:
It happened, and the Indian Knowledge editor (an employee of the Guttmacher organisation promoting their how-to abortion manual on enwiki) was tracked down in the real world and dismissed from her medical job in India and had her medical licence suspended for 6 years, which she has appealed.
1489:'s advice for reviewing NLT and engaging with you, before blocking me, was I not supposed to be asked if I intended that sentence as a legal threat ? Was I not supposed to be given adequate time to respond ? What was so "urgent" that I had to be blocked indefinitely ? Does my statement
1112:
obvious vandalism. I gave you a bye, saying I thought you were acting in good faith by violating 3RR and claiming exemption, and instead of taking that onboard, here you are still arguing it was obvious vandalism because some of the accounts were suspicious. That. Does. Not. Qualify.
1650:
is mostly legal in USA but illegal in India where its a criminal offence. So should Knowledge (in India) be allowed to provide instruction manuals detailing how to carry out self induced abortions which Indian women (possibly underage teens) might access ? The answer is not simple.
303:, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Knowledge is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.
983:
2 other established editors undid identical revisions. Were they disruptive too ? Look I'm sorry that I upset somebody's plans to resolve this quietly so the Govt threat would vanish, but that is what happens when there is information assymetry.
488:
The reason 1,387 edits between 2012 and 2019 from this account are not accessible to anyone, even oversighters, is said to be due to a court order affecting 67 user accounts in India related to paid editing being carried out by 3 EN:Knowledge
1093:
and this group of vandals ? NB - It is on the wikipedia review badsites that those previous Indian vandals allegedly caused WMF (and therefore the contributors) US$ 300,000 in legal fees. Why should these new ones be any different.
1193:
and then ditch all your pleadings about how you were doing the right thing, and how you feel you should have the right to edit-war indefinitely based on your own criteria, and then simply pick one or more (preferably all} of the
1320:
as part of the terms of the consent order, WMF INDIA Chapter had agreed to take the Indian domains wikipedia.in and wikimedia.in offline. This has been independently verified by me from archive.org using the URL
215:
1217:
or something similar that focuses precisely on a valid reason why you should be unblocked. Use that as your unblock request and hope that you haven't pissed off so many admins that nobody will respond to it.
199:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1474:
No reasonable person in the real world would construe that extracted sentence to be a legal "threat". The other valid interpretation is that I was conveying my expertise in the matter as in
1447:, I'm tempted to say "revoke talk page access" and be done with the time wasting. But, as a policy, I'd prefer it if someone else addresses any unblock requests the user chooses to make.--
1837:
in the future. Soon enough, your ability to edit this talk page will be revoked if this discussion continues. I'd like to ask visiting editors to cease with the forum-like discussion.
185:
133:
126:
118:
114:
1721:
1346:"special tribunal" is not competent to issue an order with regard to your block. So you're going to have to look elsewhere for help in getting unblocked. I hope that is clear now.
1899:
as a clear legal threat. You are welcome to explain yourself in an unblock request and see if another admin sees it differently. In my opinion, if you make another comment
1814:, the newspaper stories were not leaked by the Indian Government or any of their people (Rule 16 of Section 69-A strictly prohibits any such disclosure). It was leaked by
141:
1480:
and that subsequently Google took down their entire BLOGSPOT.IN domain containing almost a million blogs. But heck, I forgot ... Knowledge doesn't tolerate "experts"
1189:
Despite it all, nobody here wants to see you blocked if there's a possibility you may be able to edit constructively and collaboratively in the future. Please read
459:
You see the discrepancy. By the way, my real first edit was to a page that got speedy deleted, so is not shown on my contribution history (at least to non-admins).
1186:
does not constitute vandalism, and the only thing that's bizarre is your presumption that you can lecture experienced editors on how Knowledge ought to function.
757:
749:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
805:
I object to an unblock, too. Aghore, you clearly do not understand enwiki. I suggest you do some research on how we work here before requesting an unblock.
1421:
name at enwiki. In point of fact I recall the term used was "official action" or suchlike when I last enquired from counsel appearing in those matters.
433:
You need to be very cautious with some of these tools, because their results can be misleading. With my user account (as a non-controversial example):
1700:
absolutely write an article about it. But if she was actually "promoting their how-to abortion manual on enwiki", she shouldn't ahve been doing that.
933:
Sorry, they were sent here by off-wiki coordination to disrupt the encyclopedia and take down that specific link. And that is vandalism in my book.
280:, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
1815:
1391:
1031:
find that the 2 anon IP addresses I reverted were logged out edits by editors discussing vehemently on the talk page for deletion of that link.
61:
144:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
1761:
1729:
1623:
1593:
237:
1384:
1190:
734:
636:
536:
1724:
will conclude that WP has bowed to his authoritah, and so not order any blocks. This time. Btw, who is the Godfather in this example?
819:
Can you show me disruptive mainspace edits other than today's ? FYI, I don't concede that my mainspace edits today were disruptive,
951:
rather than your own. What I have been telling you llterally all day today is that you do not apparently understand the exemption.
777:? It is no secret that wikipedia admins have IRC channels to discuss these things which ordinary plebe editors have no access to.
1757:
1725:
1619:
1589:
285:
1897:
Oh BTW, did I mention that I got 300+ Google websites taken down under the same section of law ie. 69-A, from the same office ?
1086:
I requested Doug Weller to have eyes on this page, because I edited a page which was subjected to major long term sockpuppetry
233:
137:
1876:
statement has to be read in the context of u:331Dot's action, where he says first withdraw your legal threat. My questions to
333:
and contacted senior admins like Bishonen and Doug Weller about the persistent vandalism on this page, and I was also on the
1668:
for anything, including self-induced abortion. That's not because we're censored. It's because we aren't a how-to guide.
688:
the Govt where I reside has chosen to send a formal takedown notice, well Sheesh again !!! When an admin says I am lying
1585:
631:
442:
208:
66:
46:
34:
26:
1365:
220:
1443:
Since all Aghore is doing is posting some random stuff about tribunals and not addressing the reasons for the block (
308:
269:
608:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
526:
436:
382:
122:
56:
833:
Please don't talk down to me with comments like "you clearly do not understand enwiki". It is rude and offensive
609:
521:
516:
292:
71:
603:
451:
341:
policy as far as I can tell. If you would like to suggest to me where I specifically erred, I would like that.
277:
272:. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Knowledge this is known as "
1383:
template to your user page, making sure that you phrase your reason in a way that conforms to the guidance in
37:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Knowledge:
1357:
to be able to create a competent appeal in this case. There are three avenues open to you to get unblocked:
1178:
300:
273:
261:
41:
682:
1909:
1753:
1453:
578:
557:
196:
154:
1495:
engage in an external (real life) legal or other governmental process that would target other editors
650:
1169:
948:
796:
764:
281:
1862:
1775:
1743:
1705:
1673:
1665:
1640:
1529:
1117:
1075:
1003:
956:
922:
893:
810:
317:
51:
1213:"I promise I will do my best to avoid giving any impression of making a legal threat in future."
532:
You are not allowed to edit Knowledge while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.
1090:
179:
1904:
1877:
1481:
1471:
1448:
1374:
1361:
1161:
1146:
Are you saying that persistent sockpuppetry does not constitute vandalism ? Thats bizarre .
743:
720:
681:
I was discussing the legal aspects with Jacob Rogers of WMF Legal over at wikimedia Commons
573:
552:
542:
465:
296:
227:
192:
149:
91:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
207:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1404:
1223:
428:
386:
330:
1328:
orders and also satisfies the UNBLOCK scheme of enwiki of legal matters being resolved.
1128:
You call them newbs, I call them sockpuppets and SPAs (please read the definitions) and
967:
1871:
I did not talk about initiating legal action. I was (sarcastically) protesting that it
1165:
792:
760:
265:
204:
84:
1858:
1771:
1739:
1701:
1669:
1636:
1525:
1354:
1350:
1113:
1071:
999:
952:
918:
889:
806:
334:
313:
200:
1738:
Pretty sure the point was ol' Ajay wanted to get his name in the paper. So win-win?
1087:
947:
May very well be, but the book you need to consider when assessing 3RR exemption is
1016:
You probably may like to read WMFs Terms of Use again. 22:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
998:
That literally has zero to do with it. We do not care about the government threat.
338:
171:
113:. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
1212:
1207:
1202:
1197:
1882:
1819:
1686:
1651:
1632:
1605:
1546:
1498:
1422:
1329:
1296:
1267:
1251:
1147:
1133:
1095:
1067:
1054:
1032:
985:
970:
934:
885:
860:
834:
820:
778:
716:
693:
614:
490:
462:
413:
367:
342:
110:
1203:"It was never my intention to use any legal threat to make a point in a debate.
337:
page for protection for this article. At no stage was I uncivil or violate any
1486:
1478:
1475:
1417:
1400:
1250:
I'm sorry that my posts gave the impression that I was making a legal threat.
1219:
1208:"I withdraw without reservation any implication of a legal threat in my posts.
1198:"I'm sorry that my posts gave the impression that I was making a legal threat.
291:
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to
30:
1385:
Knowledge:Guide to appealing blocks #Composing your request to be unblocked
1160:
English Knowledge has a long tradition of constructive sockpuppetry (check
969:
A sleeper account just waiting to be activated for this specific purpose ?
507:
1854:
1839:
1272:
535:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
106:
539:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
256:
211:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
189:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
297:
punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring
1321:
1914:
1890:
1866:
1848:
1827:
1779:
1765:
1747:
1733:
1709:
1694:
1677:
1659:
1644:
1627:
1613:
1597:
1554:
1533:
1506:
1458:
1430:
1408:
1337:
1304:
1281:
1259:
1227:
1155:
1141:
1121:
1103:
1079:
1062:
1040:
1007:
993:
978:
960:
942:
926:
897:
868:
842:
828:
814:
800:
786:
768:
724:
701:
583:
562:
498:
469:
421:
389:
375:
350:
321:
241:
157:
102:
224:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
97:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
366:
I joined Knowledge in 2009, but thanks for the welcome anyway.
214:
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
183:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
1390:
Compose a request to be unblocked using the form linked from
859:
I clarify that I have not made any legal threats whatsoever.
594:
506:
1584:
Valereee, you are clearly wrong here. We would note it at
1315:
Important update from Knowledge legal regarding UNBLOCKING
1089:. Now I ask you what is the difference between those LTAs
731:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
751:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1444:
1129:
689:
664:
660:
654:
645:
641:
627:
623:
619:
570:
446:
411:
195:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1387:, and hope you can convince an admin to unblock you;
602:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
1752:Maybe. But what if somebody points out the refs in
1484:
since everybody is anonymous over here <rol: -->
1364:whether they feel that the conditions laid down in
1895:I'm not really interested in debating this. I see
1394:and hope you can convince an admin to unblock you.
1903:, your talk page privileges should be removed. --
1368:have been met, and persuade them to unblock you;
299:. In particular, editors should be aware of the
1664:Not a great example; we don't actually supply
8:
1324:and both the domains are presently offline.
791:I object (and fairly strongly) to unblock.--
1172:is defined as "editing (or other behavior)
1132:hours, its because of RFP being backed up.
913:can't see it. 21:01, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
527:making legal threats or taking legal action
132:For additional information, please see the
117:is in effect. Any administrator may impose
1109:After being told this was not an exception
166:
129:, when making edits related to the topic.
1720:On the plus-side, there is a good chance
949:Knowledge:Vandalism#What_is_not_vandalism
383:You do know we can see when you're lying?
276:" and is usually seen as obstructing the
1756:to him, will it be blocking-time again?
1053:Am I allowed to ask a question of you ?
1816:Centre for Internet and Society (India)
1604:It's all a big joke isn't it ?? Ha ha.
1392:Knowledge:Unblock Ticket Request System
439:Toddy1 registered: 20:20, 22 April 2011
410:Choose your words carefully my friend.
1588:and likely write an article about it.
121:on editors who do not strictly follow
1497:? If so, please cite it back to me ?
7:
1353:? You need to be very familiar with
454:Created on 30 December 2006 at 16:29
307:You are currently in an edit war at
180:2020 Arbitration Committee elections
1191:Knowledge:Guide to appealing blocks
1182:". So, no, persistent sockpuppetry
1177:intended to obstruct or defeat the
917:that you do not understand enwiki.
163:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
134:guidance on discretionary sanctions
1618:I'm fairly sure we would do that.
1322:http://wikimedia.in/wikipedia.html
14:
295:on that page. This isn't done to
1493:say anywhere that I intended to
268:other editors' contributions at
255:
170:
83:
1818:after WMF received the notice.
218:and submit your choices on the
1901:that is not an unblock request
1445:this legal threat, for example
329:I have strictly complied with
264:. You appear to be repeatedly
1:
293:lose their editing privileges
242:01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
197:Knowledge arbitration process
42:The Five Pillars of Knowledge
1915:01:48, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
1891:01:02, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
1867:00:47, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
1849:00:44, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
1828:00:40, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
1780:00:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
1766:00:33, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
1748:00:31, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
1734:00:25, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
1710:00:42, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
1695:00:36, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
1678:00:22, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
1660:00:17, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
1645:23:55, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
1628:23:52, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
1614:23:49, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
1598:23:44, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
1586:Internet censorship in India
1555:23:34, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
1534:23:21, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
1507:23:49, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
1459:22:46, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
1431:23:15, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
1409:22:26, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
1338:18:17, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
1305:09:02, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
1282:00:52, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
1260:22:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
1228:22:32, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
1156:22:00, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
1142:21:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
1122:21:45, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
1104:21:33, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
1080:21:23, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
1063:21:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
1041:21:23, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
1008:21:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
994:21:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
979:21:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
961:21:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
943:21:10, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
927:21:07, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
898:20:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
869:20:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
843:20:50, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
829:20:45, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
815:20:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
801:20:33, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
787:20:26, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
769:20:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
725:02:58, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
702:20:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
584:18:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
563:18:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
499:10:15, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
470:11:52, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
443:Special:Contributions/Toddy1
422:15:39, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
390:15:34, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
376:11:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
351:11:10, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
322:11:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
158:08:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
62:How to write a great article
1366:Knowledge:Appealing a block
1266:I have a question for you,
606:, who declined the request.
101:You have shown interest in
1937:
437:Special:CentralAuth/Toddy1
234:MediaWiki message delivery
127:page-specific restrictions
735:guide to appealing blocks
537:guide to appealing blocks
1886:
1823:
1770:oooh...excellent point.
1690:
1655:
1609:
1550:
1502:
1426:
1333:
1300:
1255:
1151:
1137:
1099:
1058:
1036:
989:
974:
938:
864:
838:
824:
782:
697:
494:
452:Special:ListUsers/Toddy1
417:
371:
346:
232:to your user talk page.
1881:request. Fair enough ?
138:Arbitration Committee's
115:discretionary sanctions
599:
511:
309:Bhutan–India relations
278:normal editing process
270:Bhutan–India relations
1754:Self-induced abortion
1399:I hope that helps. --
1379:Your reason here ~~~~
1168:for prime examples).
651:change block settings
598:
547:Your reason here ~~~~
510:
447:12:57, 1 January 2007
193:Arbitration Committee
177:Hello! Voting in the
266:reverting or undoing
262:welcome to Knowledge
123:Knowledge's policies
1758:Gråbergs Gråa Sång
1726:Gråbergs Gråa Sång
1620:Gråbergs Gråa Sång
1590:Gråbergs Gråa Sång
1176:
600:
512:
209:arbitration policy
67:Naming conventions
47:How to edit a page
35:your contributions
1913:
1457:
1179:project's purpose
1174:
582:
561:
525:from editing for
301:three-revert rule
248:
247:
1928:
1907:
1847:
1451:
1382:
1280:
1214:
1209:
1204:
1199:
1162:User:Utgard Loki
748:
742:
670:
668:
657:
639:
637:deleted contribs
597:
576:
555:
550:
468:
432:
259:
231:
174:
167:
152:
87:
78:Important Notice
57:Picture tutorial
52:Editing tutorial
33:. Thank you for
1936:
1935:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1838:
1372:
1317:
1271:
754:
746:
740:
739:, then use the
728:
705:
658:
648:
634:
617:
610:blocking policy
595:
592:
590:Unblock request
566:
565:
540:
533:
530:
460:
426:
253:
225:
165:
150:
147:
146:
88:
80:
72:Manual of Style
19:
12:
11:
5:
1934:
1932:
1924:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1630:
1601:
1600:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1537:
1536:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1412:
1411:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1388:
1369:
1347:
1343:
1316:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1285:
1284:
1263:
1262:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1215:
1210:
1205:
1200:
1195:
1187:
1181:
1166:User:Bishzilla
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
965:
964:
963:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
872:
871:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
773:You object to
729:
712:
708:Decline reason
679:
675:Request reason
672:
593:
591:
588:
587:
586:
534:
531:
514:You have been
513:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
457:
456:
455:
449:
440:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
380:
356:
355:
354:
353:
252:
249:
246:
245:
216:the candidates
186:eligible users
175:
164:
161:
89:
82:
81:
79:
76:
75:
74:
69:
64:
59:
54:
49:
44:
24:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1933:
1916:
1911:
1906:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1888:
1884:
1879:
1874:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1864:
1860:
1856:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1846:
1844:
1843:
1835:
1834:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1781:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1731:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1657:
1653:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1642:
1638:
1634:
1631:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1602:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1491:unambiguously
1488:
1483:
1479:
1476:
1473:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1460:
1455:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1419:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1393:
1389:
1386:
1380:
1376:
1370:
1367:
1363:
1360:Discuss with
1359:
1358:
1356:
1352:
1349:Did you read
1348:
1344:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1325:
1323:
1314:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1283:
1279:
1277:
1276:
1269:
1265:
1264:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1248:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1216:
1211:
1206:
1201:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1185:
1180:
1173:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1130:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1110:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1092:
1088:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1070:, of course.
1069:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
996:
995:
991:
987:
982:
981:
980:
976:
972:
968:
966:
962:
958:
954:
950:
946:
945:
944:
940:
936:
932:
931:
930:
929:
928:
924:
920:
915:
914:
911:
899:
895:
891:
887:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
870:
866:
862:
858:
857:
844:
840:
836:
832:
831:
830:
826:
822:
818:
817:
816:
812:
808:
804:
803:
802:
798:
794:
790:
789:
788:
784:
780:
776:
772:
771:
770:
766:
762:
758:
756:
755:
753:
752:
745:
738:
736:
727:
726:
722:
718:
711:
709:
704:
703:
699:
695:
690:
687:
683:
678:
676:
671:
666:
662:
656:
652:
647:
643:
638:
633:
629:
628:global blocks
625:
624:active blocks
621:
616:
611:
607:
605:
604:administrator
589:
585:
580:
575:
571:
568:
567:
564:
559:
554:
548:
544:
538:
528:
524:
523:
519:
518:
509:
500:
496:
492:
487:
486:
485:
484:
471:
467:
464:
458:
453:
450:
448:
444:
441:
438:
435:
434:
430:
425:
424:
423:
419:
415:
412:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
391:
388:
384:
381:
379:
378:
377:
373:
369:
365:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
319:
315:
312:
310:
304:
302:
298:
294:
289:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
258:
251:December 2020
250:
244:
243:
239:
235:
229:
223:
222:
217:
212:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
188:
187:
182:
181:
176:
173:
169:
168:
162:
160:
159:
156:
153:
145:
143:
139:
135:
130:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
99:
98:
96:
86:
77:
73:
70:
68:
65:
63:
60:
58:
55:
53:
50:
48:
45:
43:
40:
39:
38:
36:
32:
28:
23:
16:
1900:
1896:
1872:
1841:
1840:
1811:
1722:Ajay Sawhney
1494:
1490:
1378:
1326:
1318:
1292:
1274:
1273:
1183:
1175:deliberately
1108:
1028:
774:
750:
732:
730:
713:
707:
706:
685:
680:
674:
673:
646:creation log
613:
601:
546:
522:indefinitely
520:
515:
363:
306:
305:
290:
274:edit warring
254:
219:
213:
190:
184:
178:
148:
131:
100:
94:
92:
90:
21:
20:
1905:RegentsPark
1878:RegentsPark
1666:WP:NOTHOWTO
1472:RegentsPark
1449:RegentsPark
1362:RegentsPark
574:RegentsPark
553:RegentsPark
445:First edit
311:. Stop now.
260:Hello, and
221:voting page
151:Doug Weller
111:Afghanistan
1194:following:
1091:WP:LTA/IAC
1027:Checkuser
642:filter log
429:Iridescent
387:Iridescent
205:topic bans
25:Hello and
1859:—valereee
1812:Seriously
1772:—valereee
1740:—valereee
1702:—valereee
1670:—valereee
1637:—valereee
1526:—valereee
1485:. Taking
1482:WP:EXPERT
1170:Vandalism
1114:—valereee
1072:—valereee
1000:—valereee
953:—valereee
919:—valereee
890:—valereee
807:—valereee
793:Ymblanter
761:Ymblanter
733:read the
661:checkuser
620:block log
314:—valereee
286:talk page
282:consensus
201:site bans
140:decision
125:, or the
119:sanctions
31:Knowledge
1377:|reason=
1371:Add the
632:contribs
545:|reason=
331:WP:3RRNO
136:and the
107:Pakistan
93:It does
22:Welcome!
1910:comment
1853:Sorry,
1454:comment
1375:unblock
744:unblock
655:unblock
579:comment
558:comment
543:unblock
517:blocked
489:admins.
284:on the
228:NoACEMM
27:welcome
17:Welcome
1883:Aghore
1820:Aghore
1687:Aghore
1652:Aghore
1633:Aghore
1606:Aghore
1547:Aghore
1499:Aghore
1423:Aghore
1355:WP:NLT
1351:WP:GAB
1330:Aghore
1297:Aghore
1268:Aghore
1252:Aghore
1184:per se
1148:Aghore
1134:Aghore
1096:Aghore
1068:Aghore
1055:Aghore
1033:Aghore
986:Aghore
971:Aghore
935:Aghore
886:Aghore
861:Aghore
835:Aghore
821:Aghore
779:Aghore
717:331dot
694:Aghore
615:Aghore
491:Aghore
466:(talk)
463:Toddy1
414:Aghore
368:Aghore
343:Aghore
335:WP:RFP
109:, and
1873:seems
1487:RexxS
1418:RexxS
1401:RexxS
1293:Reply
1220:RexxS
775:cabal
737:first
686:after
339:WP:5P
103:India
1887:talk
1863:talk
1824:talk
1776:talk
1762:talk
1744:talk
1730:talk
1706:talk
1691:talk
1674:talk
1656:talk
1641:talk
1624:talk
1610:talk
1594:talk
1551:talk
1530:talk
1503:talk
1427:talk
1405:talk
1334:talk
1301:talk
1256:talk
1224:talk
1164:and
1152:talk
1138:talk
1118:talk
1100:talk
1076:talk
1059:talk
1037:talk
1004:talk
990:talk
975:talk
957:talk
939:talk
923:talk
894:talk
865:talk
839:talk
825:talk
811:talk
797:talk
783:talk
765:talk
721:talk
698:talk
569:See
529:.
495:talk
418:talk
372:talk
347:talk
318:talk
238:talk
191:The
155:talk
142:here
1855:Liz
1477:or
1029:may
665:log
612:).
551:.
364:FYI
95:not
29:to
1889:)
1865:)
1857:.
1845:iz
1826:)
1778:)
1764:)
1746:)
1732:)
1708:)
1693:)
1676:)
1658:)
1643:)
1626:)
1612:)
1596:)
1553:)
1532:)
1505:)
1429:)
1407:)
1381:}}
1373:{{
1336:)
1303:)
1278:iz
1258:)
1226:)
1218:--
1154:)
1140:)
1120:)
1102:)
1078:)
1061:)
1039:)
1006:)
992:)
977:)
959:)
941:)
925:)
896:)
867:)
841:)
827:)
813:)
799:)
785:)
767:)
759:--
747:}}
741:{{
723:)
710::
700:)
677::
659:•
653:•
649:•
644:•
640:•
635:•
630:•
626:•
622:•
572:--
549:}}
541:{{
497:)
461:--
420:)
385:‑
374:)
349:)
320:)
288:.
240:)
230:}}
226:{{
203:,
105:,
1912:)
1908:(
1885:(
1861:(
1842:L
1822:(
1782:*
1774:(
1760:(
1742:(
1728:(
1704:(
1689:(
1672:(
1654:(
1639:(
1622:(
1608:(
1592:(
1557:I
1549:(
1528:(
1501:(
1456:)
1452:(
1425:(
1403:(
1332:(
1299:(
1275:L
1254:(
1222:(
1150:(
1136:(
1116:(
1098:(
1074:(
1057:(
1035:(
1002:(
988:(
973:(
955:(
937:(
921:(
892:(
863:(
837:(
823:(
809:(
795:(
781:(
763:(
719:(
696:(
669:)
667:)
663:(
618:(
581:)
577:(
560:)
556:(
493:(
431::
427:@
416:(
370:(
345:(
316:(
236:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
