User talk:Agricolae - Knowledge (XXG)

3158:

one of "those dates" that even Yanks can remember. But there is a lot more to William than his invasion of England, and this article tries to put him in context of his entire life. After numerous copyedits, an extensive peer review process and lots and lots of work (including the most excellent family tree charts by Agricolae, who has no idea I just co-nom'd him for this... surprise!) This is what it looked like when I began work this January. It's doubled in size and the sourcing has been greatly improved as I've done a complete reread of the two main biographies of William to update the sourcing. I've also incorporated a number of other works on the Conquest and the time period, but the major sources remain the scholarly biographies of William. This is a wikicup nomination for me, but it's been a labour of love for myself as well as all my wonderful helpers. I present - William the Bastard who became William the Conqueror, a rather dour but extremely important historical figure."! - On a smaller scale, we have expanded

940:". Setting aside the grammatical and tone issues, this is completely irrelevant to Spanish slavery. You also removed sections on 'Christian slavery in Spain', 'African slavery in Spain' and 'Moorish Slavery in Spain', all of which are noteworthy aspects of the subject. Also, you said in some of your edit summaries that you based your changes on the Spanish-language Knowledge (XXG) article about the same subject - I looked at it, and I would cousider this characterization less than honest, as you have already been warned about. I am not going to make the argument that the existing article is good - it is not, but what you have replaced it with is no improvement. Again, if you want specific changes made along the lines you are pursuing, you had best garner consensus for the changes on the article's Talk page first. 1051:"The Moors used ethnic European slaves: 1/12 of Iberian population were slave Europeans, less than 1% of Iberia were Moors and more than 99% were native Iberians. Periodic Arab and Moorish raiding expeditions were sent from Islamic Iberia to ravage the remaining Christian Iberian kingdoms, bringing back stolen goods and slaves. In a raid against Lisbon in 1189, for example, the Almohad caliph Yaqub al-Mansur held 3,000 women and children as captives, while his governor of Córdoba, in a subsequent attack upon Silves, held 3,000 Christian slaves in 1191. In addition, the Christian Iberians who lived within Arab and Moorish-ruled territories were subject to specific laws and taxes for state protection." 3379: 1463:

article, but in all honesty I did it primarily in the hope that the problematic sentence wouldn't trigger more inconsequential noise on my watchlist. I did not at the time, nor do I now, have any intention of allowing that kind of brief visit to mission creep into an entire discussion, source evaluation, page rewriting and/or potential RfD process with this page. There are too many badly-written/badly referenced early-medieval pages on Knowledge (XXG), and one has to pick one's battles. I care so little about this one that I can't even be bothered to walk across the room to see what Settipani has to say about it. You are, of course, free to pursue it yourself.

3294: 1516:

Lambert was grandson of Robert II. A different editor then apparently tried to square the circle by replacing this with the sentence in question, that Lambert was either the son of Robert II or his father was one of Robert's sons. That is not to say that any of this represents scholarly consensus - there is way too much use in these types of pages of what is only the most recently-published speculation as if that was the same thing as scholarly consensus, but I think mine was a fair rephrasing of the intent of the original sentence, while I am open to being convinced otherwise (or having the whole thing removed).

2021:), and anyhow, a Usenet post is more off-the-cuff than some kind of formal statement of expert opinion. I would not consider any of the cited sources to be WP:RS, and as you have indicated, we have the main proponent himself admitting the name is nothing but a genealogical placeholder (not uncommon in Settipani's work, which is full of speculative connections that nonetheless get treated here as if they were red-letter fact rather than just one person's guesswork). As far as I am concerned this renders Darius inherently non-notable, unless there has been a whole lot more 2183: 2017:, and 2) a broad discussion on the Usenet group soc.genealogy.medieval and its then-mirror mailing list GEN-MEDIEVAL. Not only do both the cited Baldwin and Settipani contributions come from there, but also the dead tyndalehouse web page is by a person who participated in those discussions and appears to be relying heavily on Settipani's original work. I would suggest that at the time, neither Baldwin nor Settipani were 'experts in their field' as per the self-publication loophole (both are arguably such 478:

something, it is first written by the reporter, and then it undergoes review and editing by a separate person, the editor, who assesses it for both accuracy and noteworthiness. That does not happen on blogs, personal websites, subsidy-published books, etc., where anyone can say absolutely anything they want, whether it is untrue, misleading or just uninteresting trivia. Anything that is 'just one person's opinion' falls short of reliability and noteworthiness standards. It is all moot though, because -

965: 754: 3524: 367: 311: 255: 2269: 3204: 2093: 166: 3149: 2716: 3017:

figures (although logically this would also include many millions of "ordinary" people too). I can be a bit lazy with digging, but perhaps you can be more of an inspiration. This field of study anyway is one that is often sadly overlooked, and this page is about THE President that comes to peoples' minds first, so, you know. That wasn't a "very simple" text but please help.

1415:

citations, one for the proposal and one for the opinion that it is unlikely.) As a subsequent edit I was about to tag the individual claims as needing a citation (or "says who?"), but it seemed to violate the policy on over-tagging. The whole article being tagged as unreferenced implied that everything in it needs citation, so tagging claims individually seemed redundant.

2760: 3041:

exacerbated in the internet age. Most scholarly genealogical sources can't be bothered, rather than dedicating their valuable publication space to the refutation of patent nonsense, and as a general rule a good encyclopedia does the same thing - it focusses on what is true, not on presenting and then refuting various dated and non-scholarly alternatives.

693:

wonder why that is, when his father never inherited the title. Why should he/she have to look for an explanation some place else in the article? What's wrong with having the same remark in the chart too? Why do we have a name parameter in ref tags and in efn if they're not to be used more than once in an article? Oh, never mind.

2601:, not anyone else, to make the case for its inclusion. Instead, you have inexplicably decided to turn this into a completely pointless power struggle. I have let you know what the concers are, and you know where the Talk page is. I can't make you explain your perspective there, but your abject refusal to do so is not my fault. 3157:

Thank you today forwhat you did for the article, introduced (in 2012): "I am nominating this for featured article because after extensive work and revamping, I feel this is the best article possible for the subject. Everyone should know about William the Conqueror - his invasion of England in 1066 is

1462:

Because I had it on my watchlist just to make sure nobody tried to reinsert the 'certain descent from Clovis' claim. Since I saw the triggering edit and revert were over a poorly-written sentence, I tried to rephrase it. I could claim that in the true spirit of Knowledge (XXG) I did so to improve the

1414:

As you indicate, such narratives relating 'some say this and some say that' require specific citations either for the individual opinions or for a summary that includes the various conflicting reconstructions. (And the next statement, that the proposal that he was son of Guerin is unlikely, needs two

58:

There is a lot of sloppy usage, with all the more confusion being added by the use of armorial as an adjective - 'armorial bearings' with it used as an adjective is a legitimate alternative to coat of arms, but armorial alone, as a noun, is not. In bibliographical form, the Burke collection could be

3497:

I hope you can clear some of these things up. I also want you to know that I come in peace – I only say this because I have seen in that article's talk page utter chaos in discourse. I want to understand what happened and how it can be improved (although it seems – with your edits (removals) in 2019

1137:

That is a less-than-honest characterization. Before the recent parade of sock-/meat-puppet ethnic warriors the 'original article' said nothing of the sort. Changes against consensus that are immediately reverted do not establish a new reference point for what constitutes 'the original article' - you

2828:

As to your specific edit, someone else has already reverted it, agin over a 'process issue' but I also have concerns over the content - an 1855 history source would not be considered reliable by modern standards. If this information really is noteworthy, then oneof the many modern biographies would

2654:

An article's talk page, not just edit summaries (and absolutely not user talk pages), should always be used whenever article content needs discussion. It is up to any user involved to start a section on the article's talk page. Normally, anyone reverting something for the second time would do that.

2577:

the other user's work without discussion there. Such basic policies about conduct on Knowledge (XXG) apply to you, me, everyone. You have now done this twice, though you were specifically asked not to use my talk page while continuing to mum your issue on the article's talk page. Edit summaries are

1408:

Actually, I don't know what I am doing - that is just how I read it: that it was saying he was either son of Robert or that he was son of one of Robert's sons, and hence either a son or a paternal grandson of Robert. If you think it meant something different, then that just highlights how badly it

1347:

Oops, my bad - that article has changed since I last looked at it (a while back). In that case, there is no justification for removing Daniel from the list - he satisfies the criteria for inclusion (basically, have their own page or prominently featured on another page. However, it is bad form to

692:

But they were. And why am I not surprised you found something to "correct"? You know, people are probably actually not reading articles from start to end very often, and pictures and charts tend to draw the reader's attention. So, a reader looking at the chart might react to George being "Hon." and

3088:

That is a perspective I do not share. Not all information that is true and well sourced is noteworthy, and ancestors of a family so extremely remote that the family themselves were entirely unaware definitely falls in that category. Knowledge (XXG) was never intended to be a genealogical resource.

3060:

being the "ultimate" empirical forefather (and really it's just taking one more century step back from the earliest said ancestor on there). The grand historiography is necessary for the context of such an article devoted to the Washington dynasty itself (and it is a medieval dynasty with a simple

2913:

Talk page rather than an individual editor's Talk page to ask what you are doing wrong and find out if the reversions aren't about more than just the reason's given in an edit summary. Your next stop should be the Henry VII Talk page, not a new attempt to redo your edit or further discussion about

2246:

It would be puffery were this simply the editor's characterization. However, if the cited source in describing the battle indicates that it was a 'heavy defeat', that they were 'defeated soundly', that they were 'crushed' or 'routed' or 'slaughtered', etc., then we also don't want to whitewash the

3040:

I would suggest that it is not the purpose of Knowledge (XXG) to propagate every outlandinsh genealogy that has ever appeared, even if only to then refute it. The history of genealogy is rife with such absurdity, too many to refute every example that has appeared, and this situation has only been

1315:

violation, and so it can be deleted without further reason; 2) remove him from the surname page because he is not mentioned on the page the redirect points to; and at the same time, 3) put forward the redirect for deletion, because the only mention on the page it redirected to was an unreferenced

1105:

The real question is why you made the change from the better description to one that is in one case inferior, and in the other case misleading, and why you inserted a barely-disguised copyright violation into one of the articles? Anyhow, you made a change, it was reverted, now is the time to make

935:

With all due respect, you changed the lede to read "The Arabs The Spanish Arabs traced their origins to the two great ethnic groups or tribes of theAdnanite or Arabs of the north and the Qahtani of yemen Yes, southern Arabs". The Yamharat also collects the genealogies of other peoples such as the

3181:

Hello and salutations. I came to apologize for my edits on przewalski’s horse, and if they seemed to be counterproductive. I was attempting to add a statement meaning to say that the information regarding the horse's status as a domestic/feral animal was disputed. I was somewhat inexperienced at

3016:

to put this very simply, I understand and do agree with your revert, but I think it would be both fun and useful to the common knowledge if we both tried to find fitting sources for what you conceded was true - that George Washington's descent has been linked and theorized to a host of legendary

477:

You seem to be confused between independence - whether the material is published by the subject or someone associated with the subject - and self-published, meaning that that the person who wrote it is the one who published it, with no separate editorial review. When the New York Times publishes

1303:

the easy way: simply delete it saying simply that he is 'not notable enough to merit listing' and leave it for anyone who thinks otherwise to defend if they revert. The obvious rebuttal, though, is one for which you don't have a defense, 'he has a dedicated redirect, that that makes him notable

1069:

I didn't say "there's no wrong". I simply asked for specifics. If you are going to start a discussion on a Talk page but all you say is 'the article is all wrong and I am going to change it', you will get no useful feedback. To have a productive exchange on an article's Talk page, you must be

811:

I have had it watchlisted for a while to push back against the periodic overreaching conclusions based on DNA tests of medieval rulers, but don't really pay much attention beyond that. I have noticed that 83.227.81.54 has been making one edit after another in a manner that is concerning (it is

1515:

Returning to the question of the meaning of the altered sentence. According to the history, that sentence had been there since 2016. The page creator had first reported that Lambert was son of Robert II. He then replaced this text with a statement that Lambert's father was unknown, but that

1644:

The links from one Knowledge (XXG) language to another used to be encoded in the text of the page itself but several years ago they created a special linking database to handle these, and removed them all from the text of the page itself. On the left-hand side of the relevant page, below the

3469:

I've been looking at the DfA page which you seem to have been quite active on since 2019. This topic is very interesting and it is one that many genealogists seem to be quite personally invested in – probably part of the reason why this article has always been called 'messy'. Even now, after

2636:

berating me here over your own failure to do so previously. It doesn't change anything. This issue has remained unresolved because you refused until 4 hours ago to engage in discussion at all, except to complain about 'process' rather than addressing the issue. Anyhow, I don't think anything

2025:

discussion of his existence, which there hasn't. The topic area as a whole needs an enema to purge it of a whole lot of this type of .... Any page that relies on the tyndalehouse web site, any page that uses either the Baldwin or Settipani Usenet posts needs a thorough reevaluation.

1494:

more or less same here. There are very large number of medieval stubs. Many probably will one day be valid articles, many shouldn't exist, some will need to be totally changed. So I watch a small number, and try to be useful when I can, which includes trying to avoid articles getting

1645:

Knowledge (XXG) emblem, there is a section for "languages" that contains the links among the different language versions. This panel has an 'edit' command at the bottom that will take you to the inter-language database page, and this can then be edited, links can be added or changed.

1121:

The real question is why did you delete the word "Arab" from the original article ?? I deleted the word "Arab" from everywhere in the Emirate of Granada !! Without a convincing reason, I brought it back as it was and you want to delete the word Arab again !!why what's bothering you?

2749: 2735: 1228:

I am saying this for the last time, and will not respond further here. The process is the same any time you make a change and it is reverted. You go to the Talk page of the article in question and through discussion generate a consensus for the change that you desire to be made.

1723:

has a history of being discussed and described as a coherent grouping, though it now becomes an informal grouping rather than a formal one. With that decision made, it comes down to making somewhat arbitrary choices to make the best of a bad situation, just as has been done with

1331:

The only problem with the proper way is that the majority of the Fucked for Life article here on Knowledge (XXG) is about Daniel and his activities, I'm cautious about removing from an already under-written stub. I've also noticed all-except-two references are now dead links.

1998:, in which Settipani admits (acknowledging Baldwin's criticism) to "Darius II" being no more than a placeholder name for an unidentified person. So, I think it's safe to say the source is unreliable, and that "Darius II" is bogus. I'll nominate that article for deletion too. 3065:

but had even ancient roots and partial inspiration from medieval events and documents which Jefferson in particular and other Founders cited, from the witangemot to the Magna Charta. If even this is a problem, I'm sorry but I'll have to just edit in my best case with a firm

1174:

you just deleted my article that's true, but before deleting my article, the article was originally written the same as what I wrote, but you deleted it for no apparent reason and you returned it to what it was and you deleted it again !! What is the problem ??

393:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

337:

281:

2977: 1011:

Yes. Perhaps it wasn't clear that I was addressing my comment to Victoria, who had expressed displeasure over your removal of the section. I was intending to explain to them why the text you removed was of enough problem that it merited your action.

77:

As a followup, the whole section needs rewritten - it is standard Lobsterthermidor coat-racking - the sentence is about whether Hugh de Morville was a member of the same Morville family that held Knighton - completely irrelevant to the Gorges family.

2825:? Knowledge (XXG) is a collaborative effort, and taking discussions to individual User Talk pages unnecessarily personalizes every content dispute into a one-on-one conversation, when others following the page may also have something to contribute. 2247:

historical reality by intentionally minimizing the outcome, using language so neutral as to conflate everything from an anihilation to a stalemate from which they were the first to withdraw under the same generic description, 'they were defeated'.

2067:

If I remember correctly, I became aware of the first of them when the AfD (or another related AfD) appeared on the History deletion sorting page. I then searched all of Knowledge (XXG) for other pages using the tyndalehouse and Baldwin references.

2857:

Two different things need to be done for this style of citations. You need to insert the harvard-style citation into the text, and you also have to add the cited book to the article's Bibliography section or the citation will return an error.

1282:

Hi Agricole, I want to remove Daniel Maiorana from the page for the surname because of the same reasons you gave. And I'd like to know how to explain this in the edit summary, does his listing go against any WP notability criteria? Thank you.

856:

a number of those accounts that look like sockpuppets to me. It's my first time going to that noticeboard though, so if you have any other suggestions/feedback let me know. Otherwise I assume it's a matter of waiting for the outcome. Cheers,

3055:

Thank you for the thoughtful reply, and certainly you make a good point. I personally believe that there should be some kind of mention – and to be fair there is a lot of WP:RS concerning this and it's not roleplaying speculation – of

812:

inherently concerning any time an IP makes a whole bunch of edits claiming that the current article is biased), but I have yet to summon up the interest to take a close look at what they have been doing, nor am I likely to.

550:

When you put the same thing in three times, in the face of objection and in spite of an ongoing Talk discussion, I don't think 'forcing' is as unfair as you suggest. I am not opposed to the information being in the article,

1650:

In this case, though, the link has already been programmed into the 'languages' panel, as indicated by the appearance of 'Português' among the listed languages. Clicking that will take you to the page you were indicating.

2978:

https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Early_History_of_Christ_s_College_Ca/11P6zpfiXWAC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22henry+vii%22+%22christ+college%22+%221505%22+%22letters+patent%22&pg=PA341&printsec=frontcover

2421:

of Russians and Ukranians having revert wars over the order. Knowledge (XXG) has a long history of intentionally avoiding this type of nationalistic conflict by using non-subjective ordering, such as alphabetical order.

3249: 3122: 2136: 209: 397:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

341:

285:

1687:

for this group of species, a Google Scholar search for "subgenus Oxanthera" doesn't show any takers, so at best "false oranges" are an informal group, which makes the taxobox a problem, since it shouldn't target

3492:

When will the maintenance template be removed? Or rather, what does the article need for it to finally be good? Do you have any idea how the page can be improved to a state where it is worthy of no maintenance

2042:

Hi again. May I ask how did you come about those articles I nominated earlier? I found them by scrolling through a now-inactive editor's ("Anriz") contributions list, and quite a lot of those have serious

2897:

And just to make sure this is clear, while my original edit summary only mentioned citation style so you reinserting it with an attempt to fix the citation style would not constitute edit waring, now

3233:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2120:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 555:. However, when text gets removed from an article for poor sourcing, as happened with this text months ago (and it was a different editor who removed it, not me), it shouldn't be put back in without 193:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2402: 1372: 100:

Thanks. Good explanation - if I come across the term again, I'll change it myself. Regarding the rest I'm keeping shtum until the current discussions on his talk page/sub-page come to an end. —

2227:. Also i believe, despite my mistake in Knowledge (XXG) terminology, my edit is justified, because in phrase: "and were heavely defeated" the word "heavely" INDEED against wikipedia rules as 1333: 1284: 1769:) that all the oxantheras belong to a single synonymous species. Either of these possible outcomes would restore formal validity to a taxobox designation, at which time it could be restored. 1393:. OTOH the whole thing is unsourced, and I have not looked into it for a long time. So presumably you know what you are doing. I just note it in case there is a chance you made a mistake. -- 3218: 2821:

A better place to talk about this is the article's Talk page. This is now the third User Talk page I have seen discussions of your recent edits to the Henry VII page - why aren't you using

2106: 179: 278: 3489:

guy. Whenever I see people discussing DfA online, Settipani's name is always mentioned – however it is noticeably absent from the current article. Did you remove him? If so, why?

3293: 334: 2273: 390: 2398: 920:

Yes, the article contains a great effort. As for exaggeration, there is no exaggeration in my article. Rather, I wrote the facts that existed as well in the Abbasid era.

906:

Yes, the article contains a great effort. As for exaggeration, there is no exaggeration in my article. Rather, I wrote the facts that existed as well in the Abbasid era.

1160:

I mean you deleted the word "Arab" yourself from the entire article, why? i rewrote it as it was, what makes you want to delete it? Is the article wrong, for example?

853: 2511:. If you have concerns about the article, we hope that you will fix it up or post your concerns on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, please go to 1337: 1288: 1194:, where to discuss if you wish to establish a new consensus in favor of the version you prefer. Do what I suggested, don't do what I suggested, but I'm done with 3478:

This page clearly has some history (ha ha). From what I see, there was a nuclear war on the page more than a decade ago. It seems to have revolved around this @

1578:, of whether or not the theory that a genetic link exists between race and intelligence is a fringe theory. This RfC supercedes the recent RfC on this topic at 1544:, of whether or not the theory that a genetic link exists between race and intelligence is a fringe theory. This RfC supercedes the recent RfC on this topic at 1190:

I reverted this aspect of your changes because they fly in the face of the established consensus and the prior stable versions of the article. I have told you,

59:

called (with a bit of liberty) Burke's Armorial, but not Burke's Armorials, but there is no good reason not to name it correctly. I will give the page a look.

2394: 1316:

passim mention that has been removed as a BLP violation (which will remove the reasoning above that 'if he has a redirect be must be notable enough to list').

3440:

Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way.

3396:

Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way.

379: 323: 267: 3570: 2593:

Sigh. I specifically asked you to explain your perspective on the article's Talk page. Days later, you have still not done so. As to obligations, when

3423: 2843:

Ok here is the new source but I’m sorry I just can’t figure out how to do the citations is there a tool to get them easily in the format for the page?

2387:

Well, the Russian name is undoubtedly more important. It is the closest language to old east slavonic, and the Kievan Rus were effectively Russians.

3591: 1995: 2775:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 2723: 3140: 1090:

What make you delete the word "arab" from everywhere?? I saw you do the same things in most article is there's any problem?for delete what i add?

2806:

Good evening sir just wanted to make sure you accept my edit after I corrected the citation and that you don’t feel I was edit warring about it.

3531: 3517: 3000: 1987: 1961: 1671:

It's always difficult to know what to do with previously recognized taxa that have had widespread use, and I did hesitate before redirecting

3378: 1298:

You have two options, one is the easy way but more likely to get reverted, the other is the proper way that should have been done years ago.

3272: 2569:

If you have issues with article content because of edits by another user, and the issues are not primarily about user behavior, you are to

2535: 2159: 1409:

was written before, such that two relatively experienced people could read it as meaning different things. What did you read it as saying?

231: 2776: 559:

sourcing, not just whatever webpage on finds. I would think Debrett's would have this information, and it would be an acceptable WP:RS.

2232: 709:

1) No, they were not appropriate, as explained above. You found an acceptable source, so quit being argumentative for its own sake. 2)

2201:

Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free.

1257:

page too (can't revert now, it's against the 3-revert rules) since it totally deletes the leaders who founded and ruled the caliphate (

771:

Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free.

1750:

use a species-level taxobox even though hosting discussion of multiple species (for a given and ever-changing value of species within

1376: 1364: 3595: 1145:

to the article, then you can go a step further than your predecessors and actually try to make your case on the article's Talk page.

3607: 2761:

Template:Did you know nominations/Animal Locomotion: An Electro-photographic Investigation of Consecutive Phases of Animal Movements

2655:

You are no exception. As long as you do not acknowledge this accepted procedure there is still an issue here about your conduct. --

1948: 25:

which includes several mentions of "armourials". I guess the same correction to "arms" would be relevant here, but am not certain.

1742:

genus concept seems to have become consensus). In terms of precedent, Australian limes and Papeda have had the taxobox removed,

925: 911: 881: 2779:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 3268: 2155: 1990:

a 1996 forum post in which one "Stewart Baldwin" criticized a genealogical reconstruction of ancient Middle Eastern royalty by

227: 3242: 2129: 202: 3583: 3535: 3513: 2905:. That changes the context in which a subsequent reinsertion would be viewed. Just in general, when material gets reverted 1435: 2499:, a working group reviewing featured articles promoted between 2004 and 2015. An article that you nominated for FA status, 1371:) 00:59, 1 April 2021 (UTC) Hi Agricolae, regarding the Fucked for Life and Maiorana pages, is Daniel's birthdate sourced? 674:- this was never about 'being on the right track'. Iit was always about not including information on living people without 417:

The first source says that Lord de Mauley and his wife have no children. The second source say that George is his brother.

21:

Hi. I noted your post on Lobsterthermidor's talk page about the use of the word "armorial". Browsing today, I came across

3587: 486:

Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources.

3603: 2443: 1969: 1796: 2507:. Can you check the article and determine if it meets the FA criteria? If it does, please mark it as "Satisfactory" on 383: 327: 271: 3254: 2141: 921: 907: 877: 214: 2512: 1693: 1195: 2780: 2766: 1571: 1537: 1500: 1398: 1268: 3470:

extensive revisions, it still has its maintenance template. That in mind, you seem to be versed in the history of

2870: 2822: 2417:

subjective, subject to the beliefs and assumptions of individual editors, and there have been previous instances

1719:

that are hard to deal with. I think it is worth keeping the page because the group of species formerly known as

1715:

Because of Swingle creating these groups, and then phylogeny reintegrating them, there are a number of these in

1054:

That's very very very wrong!!and there's no source!!i start wrote another one and delete all that's messy stuff

2281: 1070:

explicit in terms of the specific problems and how you intend to change the article to address these problems.

978: 3230: 2539: 2117: 190: 2413:

The problem is that many Ukranians mave a different perspective. Such determinations of 'most important' are

876:

I modified the research on the history of slavery and recorded it in Knowledge (XXG) in the English language

455:

It's about compiling information, and this is two pieces of info that taken together can only mean one thing.

2763:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 2660: 2623: 2583: 2236: 2014: 1965: 1910: 1804: 1705: 1615: 1368: 1258: 700: 598: 525: 468: 427: 2508: 2390: 3471: 3167: 2709:

DYK for Animal Locomotion: An Electro-photographic Investigation of Consecutive Phases of Animal Movements

1757:

I guess the easiest solution is to just remove the taxobox until/unless either someone publishes a formal

518:

anything. I am adding sources as I find them. I could sneak it into the article, but that would be gaming.

262: 246: 3599: 2496: 2489: 2296:

What’s the phrases you’re searching for to find the genealogy issues? You can email if you want to avoid

1634: 3114: 2997: 2865:

As to the new source you have identified, it is still problematic, but we shouldn't be talking about it

2728: 2500: 2485: 2182: 1496: 1445: 1394: 1264: 832: 802: 3544: 3061:

medieval CoA). It's in the same vein as even now the mainstream consensus that USA's existence was not

318: 302: 2740:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2578:

not sufficient, and do not replace our obligation to discuss article content on article talk pages. --

2013:

This all traces to two sources. 1) a highly-speculative self-published work by Settipani on possible

1994:, as involving too much conjecture. The Darius II article you brought to my attention also references 437:

Knowledge (XXG) is not about drawing deductions from clues. We don't get to draw our own conclusions.

374: 358: 3355: 3075: 3026: 2792: 1590: 1556: 1308: 862: 3212: 2503:, has been marked as "Satisfactory" by two editors, meaning that they believe the article meets the 2100: 1630: 173: 3486: 3187: 2447: 2277: 1991: 1059: 399: 343: 287: 3499: 3226: 2771:

Animal Locomotion: An Electro-photographic Investigation of Consecutive Phases of Animal Movements

2736:

Animal Locomotion: An Electro-photographic Investigation of Consecutive Phases of Animal Movements

2224: 2113: 186: 3479: 3445: 3401: 2933: 2848: 2811: 2743: 2656: 2619: 2579: 2366: 2338: 2305: 2206: 1800: 1701: 1611: 1218: 1180: 1165: 1127: 1095: 776: 696: 594: 521: 464: 423: 403: 347: 291: 107: 47: 3422: 2297: 481: 1787:

taxonomy is an utter mess at present. (Rutaceae more generally is improving; the 2021 paper at

3566: 3503: 3328: 3163: 3057: 3007: 2504: 2056: 2003: 1929: 1895: 1861: 1747: 1440:

Why not ask the creator of the article to provide reliable source(s) or it will be deleted? --

964: 849: 147: 3238: 2534:

Hi, posted it on the TP of Sigrid the Haughty. Sorry for misspelling your nick there, btw. T

2125: 198: 3261: 2459: 2148: 1838: 1788: 1489: 1441: 827: 797: 221: 3553: 3241:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3234: 3118: 2128:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2121: 1579: 1575: 1545: 1541: 1312: 753: 201:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 194: 3431: 3387: 3351: 3130: 3069: 3020: 2788: 2520: 1825: 1725: 1586: 1552: 1031: 1001: 858: 1821:

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1692:

when this isn't the subject of the article. We could set up a taxonomy template at, say,

2446:

go by, and I appreciate it--to find that in the end, all roads lead not to Rome, but to

848:

Hi, I've noticed you've been seeing and dealing with a lot of these disruptive edits on

3463: 3183: 3090: 3042: 2943: 2915: 2874: 2830: 2829:

have mentioned it, and if so, one of them should be cited rather than this old source.

2686: 2638: 2615: 2602: 2550: 2470: 2423: 2348: 2316: 2248: 2069: 2027: 1770: 1652: 1607: 1517: 1464: 1416: 1349: 1317: 1250: 1230: 1199: 1146: 1107: 1071: 1055: 1013: 941: 892: 813: 714: 679: 632: 560: 489: 438: 79: 60: 3552:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be

2048: 2044: 3441: 3397: 2929: 2844: 2807: 2362: 2334: 2330: 2301: 2202: 1876: 1214: 1176: 1161: 1123: 1091: 977:

Thank you for fixing the Muladi links. Take this as a token of forgiveness. Regards,

772: 101: 41: 37: 22: 36:

by Burke (1884), which matches the reference cited to it (p. 413) - it's from here:

2052: 1999: 1925: 1921: 1891: 1887: 1857: 1853: 990: 762: 458:

Peerage News is not published by Lord de Mauley. NYT is also "self-published" then.

143: 139: 3203: 2092: 793: 165: 3343: 3302: 3148: 2715: 2455: 1844: 132: 2571:

write about such issues on the article's talk page, not on the user's talk page

1005: 32:(1884) in the Refs and Sources sections may be wrong too. I have a pdf copy of 3126: 2770: 2516: 2192: 1600: 1027: 997: 1679:. A remaining problem is that although in 2009, Bayer et al. suggested using 3159: 1914: 1761:

taxonomy using formal subgenera, or detailed genomic analysis of the Sahul

1629:

Se não e assim então como e que e que eu não vi outro geito, existe outro?

3576:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

2361:

Yeah... I feel sometimes like all I do on wiki is cleanup any more.... --

1831: 1734: 3245:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2132:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

205:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3611: 3507: 3449: 3405: 3359: 3276: 3222:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3191: 3171: 3134: 3098: 3083: 3050: 3034: 2996:, as I probably should of placed that info on the Bluetooth page. :) — 2951: 2937: 2923: 2882: 2852: 2838: 2815: 2796: 2694: 2664: 2646: 2627: 2610: 2587: 2558: 2543: 2524: 2478: 2463: 2431: 2406: 2370: 2356: 2342: 2324: 2309: 2285: 2256: 2240: 2228: 2210: 2163: 2110:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2077: 2060: 2035: 2007: 1973: 1947: 1933: 1899: 1865: 1808: 1778: 1743: 1709: 1660: 1638: 1619: 1594: 1560: 1525: 1504: 1472: 1449: 1424: 1402: 1380: 1357: 1341: 1325: 1292: 1272: 1238: 1222: 1207: 1184: 1169: 1154: 1131: 1115: 1099: 1079: 1063: 1035: 1021: 981: 949: 929: 915: 900: 885: 866: 835: 821: 805: 780: 722: 704: 687: 640: 602: 568: 529: 497: 488:" This is exactly what you are doing here, and it is not appropriate. 472: 446: 431: 407: 351: 295: 235: 183:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

151: 112: 87: 68: 52: 3292: 1792: 2223:

Greetings. I believe that you are correct about my edit, this isn't

1880: 1729: 1254: 937: 2276:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

1799:, offers a well supported way forward for genera and subfamilies.) 1765:

concludes (as has been the general trend in other such studies on

1348:

have the listing point to a redirect. I will fix that, at least.

3258:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2145:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1909:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

1875:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

1307:

the best way: a three step process - 1) Delete his mention from

218:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 128: 127:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

3248:

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

3216:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All

2135:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

208:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

2104:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

177:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

3458:

Descent from Antiquity: can we improve it? (and WTH happened)

2637:

productive is likely to come from continued discussion here.

1311:. His mention there is unreferenced, and as such is a clear 3522: 711:

And why am I not surprised you found something to "correct"?

3543:

Invalid and unnecessary disambiguation page containing the

1048:

Did you know the history before you say there's no wrong??

2597:

add something to a page and it gets reverted, the onus is

378:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

322:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

279:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Capture of Cambridge

266:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

3333:

May your 2023 be filled with creativity and good health.

3594:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

3229:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2993: 2859: 2574: 2451: 2116:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

1913:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1879:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1391: 1139: 515: 372:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

335:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Capture of Oxford

316:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

260:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

189:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

131:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3559:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

3162:

from a short article focused on conducting tenures. --

1606:

Hello, there is a new discussion that you may wish to

1566:

RfC on racial hereditarianism at the R&I talk-page

1532:

RfC on racial hereditarianism at the R&I talk-page

391:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Siege of Cardiff

3325:

Thank you for all your contributions during the year.

2454:; I see it's suffering from accretion again. Thanks, 2274:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

1138:

have to go before the round of disruption, like here

996:

Do you want me to help out with the article or not?--

514:

Please assume good faith, and don't allege that I am

2759:

The nomination discussion and review may be seen at

1783:

I think this is probably the best solution for now.

852:

and elsewhere, so for what it's worth I've posted a

2928:

Ok I posted in the talk page may you respond there?

1106:your case on the individual articles' Talk pages. 38:https://archive.org/details/generalarmoryofe00burk 2651:I was ill and away from Wiki work for a few days. 1817:Disambiguation link notification for September 12 1795:, which has been taken up by sources such as the 2632:A Talk message you finally got around to making 1213:How do I return it? Why don't I write it again? 123:Disambiguation link notification for November 21 2746:created more than 100,000 images for his study 1905:Disambiguation link notification for October 12 1738:in the not too distant future, as the enlarged 1574:revisits the question, considered last year at 1540:revisits the question, considered last year at 794:https://www.facebook.com/groups/149844915349213 3314:filled with peace, joy, prosperity and wonder. 1871:Disambiguation link notification for October 3 936:indigenous families, such as the Banu Qasi of 2860:see how I did this with with your Weir source 1390:Technically I guess this changed the meaning 8: 3482:guy. What the hell happened on this article? 3139: 1696:with the 'rank' "informal group" and parent 1261:). Thanks for protecting the Encyclopedia. 672:turned out the blogs were on the right track 1582:that was closed as improperly formulated. 1548:that was closed as improperly formulated. 1141:. Now, if you think this is a change that 593:An ongoing Talk discussion? Where is that? 3147: 3138: 2515:. Thanks for your help and happy editing! 2087: 1585:Your participation is welcome. Thank you. 1551:Your participation is welcome. Thank you. 160: 3485:I've also seen extensive mention to this 2732:was updated with a fact from the article 1363:Ok then, thank you for all of your help. 891:Please see my comment on your Talk page. 713:You know better than to be this uncivil. 380:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 324:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 268:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 3420: 3376: 2757:that included an ostrich and a capybara? 2450:... Once upon a time I and a few others 2180: 1732:(and will probably need to be done with 1044:What the fully wrong about the article?? 751: 3565:notice, but please explain why in your 2970: 2901:that I have a problem with the content 2742:... that the 19th-century photographer 3545:primary topic and only one other topic 1373:2A02:C7F:3846:4500:A16E:F119:3365:C358 1334:2A02:C7F:3846:4500:DF5:D6A7:90C5:F888 1285:2A02:C7F:3846:4500:DF5:D6A7:90C5:F888 844:Disruptive POV edits on several pages 796:the False Archaeology Wall of Shame. 7: 3213:2022 Arbitration Committee elections 2618:, and the sighing won't help you. -- 2101:2021 Arbitration Committee elections 631:Where you decided to open it. Here. 174:2020 Arbitration Committee elections 3498:– far better than it was before). 3474:article and I have some questions: 3231:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 3197:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message 2909:, it would be a good time to go to 2869:, we should be talking about it on 2272:There is currently a discussion at 2118:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 2084:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message 191:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 157:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message 3554:deleted for any of several reasons 3538:because of the following concern: 3532:William of Évreux (disambiguation) 3518:William of Évreux (disambiguation) 14: 3109:TFA nom for William the Conqueror 2992:Hey, thanks for the revertion on 1962:An article Knowledge (XXG) needed 1625:Ligação entre línguas (Arquijaiv) 389:The article will be discussed at 333:The article will be discussed at 277:The article will be discussed at 3421: 3377: 3327:I appreciate your help with the 3202: 2714: 2267: 2181: 2091: 1946: 963: 752: 365: 309: 253: 164: 3312:Have a wonderful holiday season 3252:and submit your choices on the 2139:and submit your choices on the 1694:Template:Taxonomy/False oranges 1086:Nasrid dynystay, emirate granda 212:and submit your choices on the 1866:05:56, 12 September 2021 (UTC) 1809:06:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC) 1779:15:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC) 1710:14:24, 10 September 2021 (UTC) 1: 3450:14:20, 31 December 2023 (UTC) 3360:22:42, 18 December 2022 (UTC) 3277:00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC) 3192:03:13, 26 November 2022 (UTC) 3172:05:22, 9 September 2022 (UTC) 2988:Revertion On Harald Bluetooth 2559:22:19, 25 February 2022 (UTC) 2544:19:56, 25 February 2022 (UTC) 2525:19:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC) 2211:14:40, 17 December 2021 (UTC) 2164:00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 2078:22:36, 29 December 2021 (UTC) 2061:22:04, 29 December 2021 (UTC) 2036:14:05, 17 November 2021 (UTC) 2008:13:18, 17 November 2021 (UTC) 1982:Darius II and the Baldwin ref 1974:16:55, 16 November 2021 (UTC) 781:14:23, 25 December 2020 (UTC) 723:19:22, 23 December 2020 (UTC) 705:19:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC) 688:18:08, 23 December 2020 (UTC) 641:21:49, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 603:20:07, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 569:12:50, 21 December 2020 (UTC) 530:20:55, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 498:20:32, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 473:18:16, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 447:16:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 432:16:13, 20 December 2020 (UTC) 408:16:57, 30 November 2020 (UTC) 352:16:57, 30 November 2020 (UTC) 296:16:57, 30 November 2020 (UTC) 236:01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC) 152:06:16, 21 November 2020 (UTC) 3612:05:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC) 3508:15:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC) 2479:16:59, 9 February 2022 (UTC) 2464:16:55, 9 February 2022 (UTC) 2444:Abraham Pietersen van Deusen 2432:16:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC) 2407:15:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC) 2371:16:59, 18 January 2022 (UTC) 2357:22:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC) 2343:20:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC) 2325:17:21, 16 January 2022 (UTC) 2310:15:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC) 2286:18:16, 15 January 2022 (UTC) 1934:05:58, 12 October 2021 (UTC) 1797:Angiosperm Phylogeny Website 1036:20:49, 25 January 2021 (UTC) 1022:19:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC) 1006:19:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC) 982:00:24, 22 January 2021 (UTC) 950:22:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC) 930:22:24, 20 January 2021 (UTC) 916:22:24, 20 January 2021 (UTC) 901:21:45, 20 January 2021 (UTC) 886:21:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC) 867:18:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC) 836:14:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC) 822:12:58, 16 January 2021 (UTC) 806:12:07, 16 January 2021 (UTC) 420:How many clues do you need? 113:11:05, 4 November 2020 (UTC) 88:19:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC) 69:19:48, 3 November 2020 (UTC) 53:19:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC) 3598:allows discussion to reach 3579:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 3562:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 3406:13:35, 1 January 2023 (UTC) 3182:editing articles back then 2329:As an aside/followup - see 2257:22:33, 8 January 2022 (UTC) 2241:17:56, 8 January 2022 (UTC) 1900:05:58, 3 October 2021 (UTC) 1661:04:45, 31 August 2021 (UTC) 1639:23:00, 30 August 2021 (UTC) 872:History of slavery in Spain 3627: 3590:exist. In particular, the 3269:MediaWiki message delivery 2952:15:34, 25 March 2022 (UTC) 2938:12:46, 25 March 2022 (UTC) 2924:04:29, 25 March 2022 (UTC) 2907:twice by different editors 2883:04:12, 25 March 2022 (UTC) 2853:03:20, 25 March 2022 (UTC) 2839:03:15, 25 March 2022 (UTC) 2816:02:29, 25 March 2022 (UTC) 2797:12:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC) 2315:Emailed per BEANS/OPAQUE. 2263:Reported for Wiki-bullying 2156:MediaWiki message delivery 1572:Talk:Race and intelligence 1538:Talk:Race and intelligence 1342:23:16, 31 March 2021 (UTC) 1326:22:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC) 1293:21:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC) 1273:20:21, 24 March 2021 (UTC) 1239:16:18, 16 March 2021 (UTC) 1223:15:57, 16 March 2021 (UTC) 1208:06:43, 16 March 2021 (UTC) 1185:05:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC) 1170:05:49, 16 March 2021 (UTC) 1155:05:19, 16 March 2021 (UTC) 1132:04:20, 16 March 2021 (UTC) 1116:03:44, 16 March 2021 (UTC) 1100:03:12, 16 March 2021 (UTC) 1080:16:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC) 1064:15:43, 11 March 2021 (UTC) 553:with an appropriate source 228:MediaWiki message delivery 3584:proposed deletion process 3427: 3383: 3291: 3146: 3135:00:24, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 2914:the Henry VII page here. 2871:Talk:Henry VII of England 2823:Talk:Henry VII of England 2695:18:28, 3 March 2022 (UTC) 2665:17:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC) 2647:17:20, 3 March 2022 (UTC) 2628:16:40, 3 March 2022 (UTC) 2611:16:26, 3 March 2022 (UTC) 2588:12:31, 3 March 2022 (UTC) 2505:featured article criteria 2187: 1945: 1843:added a link pointing to 1830:added a link pointing to 1620:13:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC) 1526:16:45, 3 April 2021 (UTC) 1505:16:27, 3 April 2021 (UTC) 1473:21:09, 2 April 2021 (UTC) 1450:20:30, 2 April 2021 (UTC) 1425:19:54, 2 April 2021 (UTC) 1403:19:30, 2 April 2021 (UTC) 1358:00:23, 1 April 2021 (UTC) 971:The Barnstar of Diligence 962: 789:I got to the Rus page via 758: 3370:Happy Kalends of January 3266:to your user talk page. 3125:to join the discussion. 3119:today's featured article 3099:04:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 3094: 3084:00:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC) 3051:04:21, 16 May 2022 (UTC) 3046: 3035:04:05, 16 May 2022 (UTC) 2947: 2919: 2878: 2834: 2690: 2685:Not for me there isn't. 2642: 2606: 2554: 2474: 2427: 2352: 2320: 2252: 2153:to your user talk page. 2073: 2031: 1774: 1656: 1521: 1468: 1420: 1381:00:09, 13 May 2021 (UTC) 1353: 1321: 1234: 1203: 1150: 1111: 1075: 1017: 945: 896: 817: 718: 683: 636: 564: 493: 442: 382:or whether it should be 326:or whether it should be 270:or whether it should be 226:to your user talk page. 83: 64: 3604:AllTheUsernamesAreInUse 3571:the article's talk page 3121:on September 9. Please 3001:12:15, 8 May 2022 (UTC) 2513:the URFA/2020 talk page 2015:Descents from antiquity 1911:Abd al-Rahman Sanchuelo 1595:22:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC) 1561:22:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC) 1259:List of Fatimid caliphs 1245:List of Fatimid caliphs 28:I think the book title 3550: 3527: 3306: 3297:Ohara Shoson (Koson), 2781:Did you know talk page 2442:So I saw your edit to 1386:Roberts of the Hesbaye 922:Thetranslaterofhistory 908:Thetranslaterofhistory 878:Thetranslaterofhistory 854:request to investigate 3596:articles for deletion 3540: 3536:proposed for deletion 3526: 3296: 3227:Arbitration Committee 3210:Hello! Voting in the 3115:William the Conqueror 2573:, and you are not to 2501:William the Conqueror 2486:William the Conqueror 2331:User:Ealdgyth#OR fest 2114:Arbitration Committee 2098:Hello! Voting in the 1700:, I guess. Thoughts? 989: 745:Natalis soli invicto! 187:Arbitration Committee 171:Hello! Voting in the 1922:Opt-out instructions 1888:Opt-out instructions 1854:Opt-out instructions 763:Natalis soli invicto 263:Capture of Cambridge 247:Capture of Cambridge 140:Opt-out instructions 3487:Christian Settipani 3143: 2777:the statistics page 2495:You are invited to 2448:Wyandanch, New York 1992:Christian Settipani 956:A barnstar for you! 3588:deletion processes 3528: 3307: 3243:arbitration policy 2755:(example pictured) 2744:Eadweard Muybridge 2575:repeatedly reverse 2469:That will happen. 2130:arbitration policy 2023:formally published 203:arbitration policy 34:The General Armory 3514:Proposed deletion 3455: 3454: 3411: 3410: 3367: 3366: 3329:Animal Locomotion 3279: 3155: 3154: 3113:I have nominated 3081: 3058:Crinan of Dunkeld 3032: 3008:Washington family 2774: 2750:Animal Locomotion 2393:comment added by 2333:for the cleanup. 2216: 2215: 2171: 2170: 2166: 1979: 1978: 1793:10.1002/tax.12543 1748:Trifoliate orange 1436:talk page stalker 1253:. Kindly see the 1196:WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT 987: 986: 850:Emirate of Sicily 826:Don't blame you. 786: 785: 319:Capture of Oxford 303:Capture of Oxford 242: 241: 110: 105: 50: 45: 30:Burke's Armorials 3618: 3581: 3580: 3564: 3563: 3525: 3425: 3418: 3417: 3381: 3374: 3373: 3347: 3335: 3315: 3289: 3288: 3267: 3265: 3206: 3151: 3144: 3082: 3068: 3033: 3019: 2994:Harald Bluetooth 2980: 2975: 2764: 2718: 2409: 2271: 2270: 2219:Viking expansion 2185: 2178: 2177: 2154: 2152: 2095: 2088: 1986:The Baldwin ref 1950: 1943: 1942: 1839:Clymenia (plant) 1497:Andrew Lancaster 1493: 1439: 1395:Andrew Lancaster 1304:enough to list'. 1265:Anchovy Aquarium 967: 960: 959: 830: 800: 756: 749: 748: 712: 673: 487: 375:Siege of Cardiff 369: 368: 359:Siege of Cardiff 313: 312: 257: 256: 225: 168: 161: 108: 103: 48: 43: 3626: 3625: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3592:speedy deletion 3578: 3577: 3561: 3560: 3523: 3521: 3460: 3416: 3372: 3337: 3323:Hi Agricolae, 3322: 3311: 3287: 3282: 3281: 3259: 3207: 3199: 3179: 3111: 3080: 3067: 3031: 3018: 3011: 2998:I'ma editor2022 2990: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2976: 2972: 2899:I have told you 2804: 2786: 2785: 2719: 2711: 2567: 2549:Not a problem. 2532: 2493: 2452:pruned it a bit 2440: 2388: 2385: 2294: 2268: 2265: 2231:. Good luck! 2221: 2176: 2174:Io, Saturnalia! 2146: 2086: 1996:this 1998 email 1984: 1941: 1907: 1873: 1826:Citrus taxonomy 1819: 1726:Australian lime 1669: 1627: 1604: 1568: 1534: 1487: 1433: 1388: 1309:Fucked for Life 1280: 1247: 1088: 1052: 1046: 994: 958: 874: 846: 828: 798: 791: 747: 710: 671: 485: 415: 413:Baron de Mauley 370: 366: 363: 314: 310: 307: 258: 254: 251: 219: 159: 125: 19: 12: 11: 5: 3624: 3622: 3602:for deletion. 3582:will stop the 3520: 3511: 3495: 3494: 3490: 3483: 3459: 3456: 3453: 3452: 3437: 3436: 3432:Happy New Year 3428: 3426: 3415: 3414:Happy New Year 3412: 3409: 3408: 3393: 3392: 3388:Happy New Year 3384: 3382: 3371: 3368: 3365: 3364: 3362: 3348: 3340:Egrets in Snow 3336: 3332: 3326: 3318: 3317: 3313: 3308: 3299:Egrets in Snow 3286: 3285:Happy holidays 3283: 3250:the candidates 3219:eligible users 3208: 3201: 3200: 3198: 3195: 3178: 3175: 3153: 3152: 3110: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3074: 3025: 3010: 3004: 2989: 2986: 2982: 2981: 2969: 2968: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2863: 2826: 2803: 2800: 2720: 2713: 2712: 2710: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2652: 2566: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2536:46.212.185.190 2531: 2530:Teensy nitpick 2528: 2492: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2439: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2419:on these pages 2384: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2293: 2290: 2278:BeatriceCastle 2264: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2220: 2217: 2214: 2213: 2198: 2197: 2188: 2186: 2175: 2172: 2169: 2168: 2137:the candidates 2107:eligible users 2096: 2085: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2064: 2063: 2039: 2038: 1983: 1980: 1977: 1976: 1957: 1956: 1951: 1940: 1937: 1906: 1903: 1872: 1869: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1818: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1755: 1668: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1647: 1646: 1626: 1623: 1603: 1598: 1567: 1564: 1533: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1428: 1427: 1411: 1410: 1387: 1384: 1361: 1360: 1329: 1328: 1305: 1300: 1299: 1279: 1276: 1246: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1211: 1210: 1158: 1157: 1143:should be made 1119: 1118: 1087: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1050: 1045: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 993: 988: 985: 984: 979:Jeromi Mikhael 974: 973: 968: 957: 954: 953: 952: 904: 903: 873: 870: 845: 842: 841: 840: 839: 838: 790: 787: 784: 783: 768: 767: 759: 757: 746: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 726: 725: 694: 656: 655: 654: 653: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 643: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 580: 579: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 519: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 479: 462: 459: 456: 450: 449: 414: 411: 364: 362: 357:Nomination of 355: 308: 306: 301:Nomination of 299: 252: 250: 245:Nomination of 243: 240: 239: 210:the candidates 180:eligible users 169: 158: 155: 124: 121: 120: 119: 118: 117: 116: 115: 93: 92: 91: 90: 72: 71: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3623: 3614: 3613: 3609: 3605: 3601: 3597: 3593: 3589: 3585: 3574: 3572: 3568: 3557: 3555: 3549: 3548: 3546: 3539: 3537: 3533: 3519: 3515: 3512: 3510: 3509: 3505: 3501: 3491: 3488: 3484: 3481: 3480:Chris Bennett 3477: 3476: 3475: 3473: 3467: 3465: 3457: 3451: 3447: 3443: 3439: 3438: 3435: 3433: 3429: 3424: 3419: 3413: 3407: 3403: 3399: 3395: 3394: 3391: 3389: 3385: 3380: 3375: 3369: 3363: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3349: 3345: 3341: 3334: 3330: 3320: 3319: 3316: 3309: 3304: 3300: 3295: 3290: 3284: 3280: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3263: 3257: 3256: 3251: 3246: 3244: 3240: 3236: 3232: 3228: 3223: 3221: 3220: 3215: 3214: 3205: 3196: 3194: 3193: 3189: 3185: 3176: 3174: 3173: 3169: 3165: 3161: 3150: 3145: 3142: 3137: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3116: 3108: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3079: 3078: 3073: 3072: 3064: 3059: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3048: 3044: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3030: 3029: 3024: 3023: 3014: 3013:Hi Agricola, 3009: 3005: 3003: 3002: 2999: 2995: 2987: 2979: 2974: 2971: 2967: 2953: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2912: 2911:the article's 2908: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2861: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2827: 2824: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2813: 2809: 2801: 2799: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2784: 2782: 2778: 2772: 2768: 2762: 2758: 2754: 2752: 2751: 2747: 2745: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2731: 2730: 2725: 2724:16 March 2022 2717: 2708: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2657:SergeWoodzing 2653: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2635: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2620:SergeWoodzing 2617: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2580:SergeWoodzing 2576: 2572: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2529: 2527: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2509:WP:URFA/2020B 2506: 2502: 2498: 2491: 2487: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2445: 2437: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2382: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2291: 2289: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2238: 2234: 2233:31.40.131.100 2230: 2226: 2218: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2199: 2196: 2194: 2189: 2184: 2179: 2173: 2167: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2150: 2144: 2143: 2138: 2133: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2109: 2108: 2103: 2102: 2097: 2094: 2090: 2089: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2066: 2065: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2041: 2040: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1981: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1958: 1955: 1952: 1949: 1944: 1938: 1936: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1918: 1916: 1912: 1904: 1902: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1884: 1882: 1878: 1877:Farley (name) 1870: 1868: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1846: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1816: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1801:Peter coxhead 1798: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1736: 1731: 1727: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1702:Peter coxhead 1699: 1695: 1691: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1649: 1648: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1624: 1622: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1612:Blockhouse321 1609: 1602: 1599: 1597: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1583: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1565: 1563: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1549: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1514: 1513: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1491: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1437: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1413: 1412: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1385: 1383: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1301: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1277: 1275: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1172: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1049: 1043: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1026:Thanks! :-)-- 1025: 1024: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1003: 999: 992: 983: 980: 976: 975: 972: 969: 966: 961: 955: 951: 947: 943: 939: 934: 933: 932: 931: 927: 923: 918: 917: 913: 909: 902: 898: 894: 890: 889: 888: 887: 883: 879: 871: 869: 868: 864: 860: 855: 851: 843: 837: 834: 831: 825: 824: 823: 819: 815: 810: 809: 808: 807: 804: 801: 795: 788: 782: 778: 774: 770: 769: 766: 764: 760: 755: 750: 744: 724: 720: 716: 708: 707: 706: 702: 698: 697:HandsomeFella 695: 691: 690: 689: 685: 681: 677: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 642: 638: 634: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 604: 600: 596: 595:HandsomeFella 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 570: 566: 562: 558: 554: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 531: 527: 523: 522:HandsomeFella 520: 517: 513: 512: 511: 510: 509: 508: 507: 506: 499: 495: 491: 483: 480: 476: 475: 474: 470: 466: 465:HandsomeFella 463: 460: 457: 454: 453: 452: 451: 448: 444: 440: 436: 435: 434: 433: 429: 425: 424:HandsomeFella 421: 418: 412: 410: 409: 405: 401: 395: 392: 387: 385: 381: 377: 376: 360: 356: 354: 353: 349: 345: 339: 336: 331: 329: 325: 321: 320: 304: 300: 298: 297: 293: 289: 283: 280: 275: 273: 269: 265: 264: 248: 244: 238: 237: 233: 229: 223: 217: 216: 211: 206: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 182: 181: 176: 175: 170: 167: 163: 162: 156: 154: 153: 149: 145: 141: 136: 134: 130: 122: 114: 111: 106: 99: 98: 97: 96: 95: 94: 89: 85: 81: 76: 75: 74: 73: 70: 66: 62: 57: 56: 55: 54: 51: 46: 39: 35: 31: 26: 24: 23:Gorges family 16: 3586:, but other 3575: 3567:edit summary 3558: 3551: 3542: 3541: 3530:The article 3529: 3496: 3468: 3461: 3430: 3386: 3350: 3339: 3324: 3321: 3310: 3298: 3253: 3247: 3224: 3217: 3211: 3209: 3180: 3164:Gerda Arendt 3156: 3112: 3076: 3071:~Sıgehelmus♗ 3070: 3066:source(s).-- 3062: 3027: 3022:~Sıgehelmus♗ 3021: 3015: 3012: 2991: 2973: 2965: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2866: 2805: 2787: 2756: 2753: 2748: 2741: 2734: 2733: 2729:Did you know 2727: 2721: 2633: 2598: 2594: 2570: 2568: 2533: 2497:WP:URFA/2020 2494: 2490:WP:URFA/2020 2441: 2418: 2414: 2389:— Preceding 2386: 2295: 2266: 2222: 2190: 2140: 2134: 2111: 2105: 2099: 2022: 2018: 1985: 1953: 1919: 1908: 1885: 1874: 1851: 1820: 1784: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1751: 1739: 1733: 1720: 1716: 1697: 1689: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1670: 1667:False orange 1628: 1605: 1584: 1569: 1550: 1535: 1389: 1365:90.195.89.74 1362: 1330: 1281: 1278:Edit summary 1263: 1248: 1212: 1191: 1173: 1159: 1142: 1120: 1089: 1053: 1047: 995: 970: 919: 905: 875: 847: 792: 761: 675: 556: 552: 422: 419: 416: 396: 388: 373: 371: 361:for deletion 340: 332: 317: 315: 305:for deletion 284: 276: 261: 259: 249:for deletion 213: 207: 184: 178: 172: 137: 126: 33: 29: 27: 20: 3344:Ohara Koson 3303:Ohara Koson 3255:voting page 3141:9 September 3063:tabula rasa 2616:Wrong again 2395:Սեաւ Պարտէզ 2142:voting page 1988:seems to be 1960:Thank you! 1845:New Ireland 1608:participate 1490:Kansas Bear 1442:Kansas Bear 991:Rus' people 829:Doug Weller 799:Doug Weller 676:appropriate 215:voting page 133:Ben Johnson 3352:Netherzone 3239:topic bans 3123:click here 3006:Help with 2966:References 2789:Cwmhiraeth 2767:here's how 2634:only after 2565:March 2022 2415:inherently 2288:to do so. 2225:WP: weasel 2193:Saturnalia 2126:topic bans 1954:French one 1939:French one 1601:Dragon Man 1587:NightHeron 1570:An RfC at 1553:NightHeron 1536:An RfC at 1192:repeatedly 859:R Prazeres 678:sourcing. 199:topic bans 17:Armourials 3600:consensus 3534:has been 3493:template? 3464:Agricolae 3235:site bans 3184:Firekong1 3177:Greetings 3160:Lars Vogt 3091:Agricolae 3043:Agricolae 2944:Agricolae 2916:Agricolae 2875:Agricolae 2831:Agricolae 2802:Henry VII 2687:Agricolae 2639:Agricolae 2603:Agricolae 2551:Agricolae 2471:Agricolae 2424:Agricolae 2349:Agricolae 2347:Yikes!!! 2317:Agricolae 2249:Agricolae 2122:site bans 2070:Agricolae 2028:Agricolae 1915:Calatrava 1771:Agricolae 1721:Oxanthera 1685:Oxanthera 1673:Oxanthera 1653:Agricolae 1631:Arquijaiv 1518:Agricolae 1465:Agricolae 1417:Agricolae 1350:Agricolae 1318:Agricolae 1231:Agricolae 1200:Agricolae 1147:Agricolae 1108:Agricolae 1072:Agricolae 1056:Suwanax12 1014:Agricolae 942:Agricolae 893:Agricolae 814:Agricolae 715:Agricolae 680:Agricolae 633:Agricolae 561:Agricolae 516:"forcing" 490:Agricolae 439:Agricolae 195:site bans 80:Agricolae 61:Agricolae 3442:Ealdgyth 3398:Ealdgyth 3331:article. 2930:Foorgood 2845:Foorgood 2808:Foorgood 2403:contribs 2391:unsigned 2363:Ealdgyth 2335:Ealdgyth 2302:Ealdgyth 2298:WP:BEANS 2292:Query... 2203:Ealdgyth 2051:issues. 1832:Clymenia 1735:Clymenia 1495:worse.-- 1251:Agricole 1215:Isamaxzs 1177:Isamaxzs 1162:Isamaxzs 1124:Isamaxzs 1092:Isamaxzs 773:Ealdgyth 482:WP:SYNTH 400:Edouard2 344:Edouard2 288:Edouard2 3500:Snspigs 3338:Image: 3262:NoACEMM 2942:Thanks 2229:MOS:WTW 2149:NoACEMM 2053:Avilich 2000:Avilich 1926:DPL bot 1892:DPL bot 1858:DPL bot 1744:Kumquat 1249:Hello, 461:Cheers. 384:deleted 328:deleted 272:deleted 222:NoACEMM 144:DPL bot 3569:or on 3346:, 1927 3305:, 1927 3117:to be 2599:on you 2456:Drmies 1881:Farley 1785:Citrus 1767:Citrus 1763:Citrus 1759:Citrus 1752:Citrus 1740:Citrus 1730:Papeda 1717:Citrus 1698:Citrus 1690:Citrus 1683:subg. 1681:Citrus 1677:Citrus 1580:WP:RSN 1576:WP:FTN 1546:WP:RSN 1542:WP:FTN 1313:WP:BLP 1255:Kutama 1198:here. 938:Aragon 3462:Hey @ 3127:Z1720 3077:(Tøk) 3028:(Tøk) 2517:Z1720 2383:Rurik 1924:.) -- 1890:.) -- 1856:.) -- 1610:in. 1028:Berig 998:Berig 142:.) -- 3608:talk 3504:talk 3472:this 3446:talk 3402:talk 3356:talk 3273:talk 3225:The 3188:talk 3168:talk 3131:talk 3095:talk 3047:talk 2948:talk 2934:talk 2920:talk 2903:also 2879:talk 2867:here 2849:talk 2835:talk 2812:talk 2793:talk 2691:talk 2661:talk 2643:talk 2624:talk 2607:talk 2584:talk 2555:talk 2540:talk 2521:talk 2475:talk 2460:talk 2428:talk 2399:talk 2367:talk 2353:talk 2339:talk 2321:talk 2306:talk 2282:talk 2253:talk 2237:talk 2207:talk 2191:Io, 2160:talk 2112:The 2074:talk 2057:talk 2049:WP:V 2047:and 2045:WP:N 2032:talk 2004:talk 1970:talk 1966:Miha 1930:talk 1896:talk 1862:talk 1805:talk 1775:talk 1746:and 1728:and 1706:talk 1657:talk 1635:talk 1616:talk 1591:talk 1557:talk 1522:talk 1501:talk 1469:talk 1446:talk 1421:talk 1399:talk 1377:talk 1369:talk 1354:talk 1338:talk 1322:talk 1289:talk 1269:talk 1235:talk 1219:talk 1204:talk 1181:talk 1166:talk 1151:talk 1128:talk 1112:talk 1096:talk 1076:talk 1060:talk 1032:talk 1018:talk 1002:talk 946:talk 926:talk 912:talk 897:talk 882:talk 863:talk 833:talk 818:talk 803:talk 777:talk 719:talk 701:talk 684:talk 637:talk 599:talk 565:talk 557:good 526:talk 494:talk 469:talk 443:talk 428:talk 404:talk 348:talk 292:talk 232:talk 185:The 148:talk 129:Fitz 104:MALL 84:talk 65:talk 44:MALL 3516:of 3466:. 2722:On 2595:you 2488:at 2019:now 1917:. 1883:. 1789:doi 1675:to 928:). 914:). 884:). 484:: " 135:. 109:JIM 49:JIM 3610:) 3573:. 3556:. 3506:) 3448:) 3404:) 3358:) 3342:, 3301:, 3275:) 3264:}} 3260:{{ 3237:, 3190:) 3170:) 3133:) 3097:) 3049:) 2950:) 2936:) 2922:) 2881:) 2873:. 2851:) 2837:) 2814:) 2795:) 2783:. 2769:, 2726:, 2693:) 2663:) 2645:) 2626:) 2609:) 2586:) 2557:) 2542:) 2523:) 2477:) 2462:) 2438:Ha 2430:) 2405:) 2401:• 2369:) 2355:) 2341:) 2323:) 2308:) 2300:. 2284:) 2255:) 2239:) 2209:) 2162:) 2151:}} 2147:{{ 2124:, 2076:) 2059:) 2034:) 2006:) 1972:) 1964:. 1932:) 1898:) 1864:) 1807:) 1777:) 1754:). 1708:) 1659:) 1637:) 1618:) 1593:) 1559:) 1524:) 1503:) 1471:) 1448:) 1423:) 1401:) 1379:) 1356:) 1340:) 1324:) 1291:) 1271:) 1237:) 1221:) 1206:) 1183:) 1168:) 1153:) 1130:) 1114:) 1098:) 1078:) 1062:) 1034:) 1020:) 1004:) 948:) 899:) 865:) 820:) 779:) 721:) 703:) 686:) 639:) 601:) 567:) 528:) 496:) 471:) 445:) 430:) 406:) 386:. 350:) 330:. 294:) 274:. 234:) 224:}} 220:{{ 197:, 150:) 86:) 67:) 3606:( 3547:. 3502:( 3444:( 3434:! 3400:( 3390:! 3354:( 3271:( 3186:( 3166:( 3129:( 3093:( 3045:( 2946:( 2932:( 2918:( 2877:( 2862:) 2858:( 2847:( 2833:( 2810:( 2791:( 2773:) 2765:( 2689:( 2659:( 2641:( 2622:( 2605:( 2582:( 2553:( 2538:( 2519:( 2473:( 2458:( 2426:( 2397:( 2365:( 2351:( 2337:( 2319:( 2304:( 2280:( 2251:( 2235:( 2205:( 2195:! 2158:( 2072:( 2055:( 2030:( 2002:( 1968:( 1928:( 1920:( 1894:( 1886:( 1860:( 1852:( 1803:( 1791:: 1773:( 1704:( 1655:( 1633:( 1614:( 1589:( 1555:( 1520:( 1499:( 1492:: 1488:@ 1467:( 1444:( 1438:) 1434:( 1419:( 1397:( 1375:( 1367:( 1352:( 1336:( 1320:( 1287:( 1267:( 1233:( 1217:( 1202:( 1179:( 1164:( 1149:( 1126:( 1110:( 1094:( 1074:( 1058:( 1030:( 1016:( 1000:( 944:( 924:( 910:( 895:( 880:( 861:( 816:( 775:( 765:! 717:( 699:( 682:( 635:( 597:( 563:( 524:( 492:( 467:( 441:( 426:( 402:( 346:( 290:( 230:( 146:( 138:( 102:S 82:( 63:( 42:S 40:—

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index