2174:
quite a learning experience, and believe it or not, the FA process for the WS page was quite an eye-opener. But many of us learned a few more things about WP, so even though the article did not achieve FA, I think one day it will and in the process has already (and will further) become a great article. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for the
Shakespeare Authorship article itself. For the past 8 or 9 months, the page has been relatively stable. In the last week, 2 or 3 new editors (and one unfortunate sockpuppet which has already been banned) have made mass deletions of referenced material. No big surprise - all the deletions were Oxfordian or anti-stratfordian. Now this is the page where most of the mainstream editors from the WS FA process said that the authorship information should go. Now,... that info is being deleted, section by section. Unbelievably, in their haste, these editors have even cut the stratfordain disclaimer (that academics dismiss all the alternative candidates) that I had grown to accept. Anyhow, because this is the WikiPjoject Shakespeare, I have been advised, and had already been considering, requesting that the editors of this page take a look at what is going on. Because I have resisted their deletions, they are now waging a campaign to have me declared some sort of SockPuppet for long-time editor BenJonson, even though I don't think he's made an edit for weeks or months. This accusation has been plastered on at least a dozen admin mailboxes - none of which, so far, has fallen for their game. I know the truth, I detest sockkpuppets, and I know that some clever administrator will be able to prove their accusations groundless. In the meantime, however, the page is the one that will suffer. In spite of the fact that most of you are staunch stratfordians, I have also found you to be reasonable and have a sense of fair play. I ask that you look at the talk page and bring some cool heads into the discussion. I ask that you look at the article and its format for the last 8 months, then look at the edits over the last few days. I realize some of you may want to hold your noses as you read the article, but if we are attempting to make these articles better, then the kind of attitudes and accusations and mass deletions goin on on any of these pages should be a cause of concern. Thanks for hearing me out.
2289:
information that comes originally from a language other than
English; in that way, for example, we would also be dismissing the French interviews with Christophe Gans purely based on the fact that they were assessed by a third-party and translated into English, then placed as a reference within an article (translations are bound to not be 100% perfect, even when translated by creators of the series themselves due to the differences among languages, but judging a given translation by simply calling it "unofficial" and holding that against it breaks Knowledge's neutral point of view). Furthermore, without production information, the article will never make it beyond B-class (eg. even w/ the references to the Translated Memories translations, the Silent Hill film page has gained GA+ status). The out-of-universe information is vital to separating fact from fiction in a fictional universe and in the context of writing an encylopedia article (see Knowledge:Manual of Style (writing about fiction)). As WikiProject Video Game's featured articles (see Category:WikiProject Video games/Featured articles) demonstrate, framing points such as how the franchise has done internationally in terms of sales and the creation and development behind a character are all essential to making a good article."
2606:"fair enough, I think that as many articles have "references in popular culture" (or something similar) sections, that as long as it does not detract from the main article, and is not overly long, then it is relevant, verifiable and most importantly interesting for the reader. I have no issue with restricting that section to a few lines, and only notable references - ie. not every song that mentions bongs. I am aware of the guidelines regarding trivia sections, and because of that think it should be a minor section, and should never dominate the whole article. I also think the fact that a couple of wikipedians deleted or proposed its deletion, despite the fact that it existed for a long time does not show consensus - this is not a paper dictionary, there is no limit (within reason) on space, and to have a few verifiable, non-intrusive facts included does no harm, and in some cases might be useful for the reader. Oh and..thanks for stepping in, this was getting a little silly, in my own defence, I did try to discuss this with the other editor, but just got responses along the lines of "
2160:. Aren't they capable of this? A bias or a vested interest in something does not relegate an editor to diminished credibility. So, why discredit their contributions when their goal may well be the same as yours, to help the encyclopedia?" and I was sorry to see it go. Might you reinstate this? It really speaks to what is going on on this page. For backgroung, you might approach Alabamaboy or SingingBadger, 2 administrators who have a lot of experience with this problem on this page. Unfortuantely, both left screaming in frustration, but perhaps they will talk to you about this.
993:, is a program for people who want help learning some of the more subtle aspects of Knowledge policy and culture. People are matched with experienced users who are willing to offer coaching. The program is designed for people who have figured out the basics of editing articles; they're not newcomers any more, but they might want some help in learning new roles. In this way, Esperanza would help keep hope alive for Knowledge because we would always be grooming the next generation of admins.
1734:
584:
try to learn from this and restrain myself somewhat in future. I've considered leaving
Xchanter a note of apology and encouragement as well, but I'm a little ambivalent about it. At any rate, I wanted to thank you and the others who were involved for your patience and good work on this; hopefully the situation will improve. FYI - I'd like to discuss "Censorship and Linkimage" as a seperate topic but I need more coffee first. --
3680:(i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –
3620:(i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.
3570:(i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.
1498:
891:, but this doesn't really contain anyting about the situation (the study itself or its predictions) other than a paragraph. In the course of rephrasing the headline I disposed of "fisheries", and as a consequence of not having an article specifically relating to the issue, I left it without a bold link. But I see that this news is on the front page of BBC online, so maybe a new article will pop up soon?
4272:
4572:
4438:
4304:
4040:
3907:
3736:
21:
3877:
3099:
2448:
close- I would certainly organize, or at least participate in some kind of wiki-meeting, but I haven't heard of a single person here who is an editor! Quite strange, considering this is one of the largest and most active websites in the universe. But thank you for your response, and I'm glad to see that we are one step closer to an authoritative encyclopedia. Thanks again,
130:(a press release is not exactly a world war); a link to the press release is sufficient for those readers who want details; and there is a CAMPAIGN article to discuss the campaign (notice the "main article" tag at the beginning of the section); that is where details are supposed to go. The campaign section in the Webb article is supposed to be a high-level summary.
557:
rigid, bureaucratic
Knowledge. It also seems to be punitive. Maybe I've missed some of his incriminating contribs (the worst I've seen are the legal threats), but I'm slightly sympathetic towards him, and I'm probably going to write some encouraging words to assure him that we're not all a bunch of assholes (not to suggest that either of you were acting that way).
1548:
3661:
3601:
3551:
4231:
3311:
2355:
3612:(i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the
1865:. I have restored the headline about the new species of bacteria. Bartonella rochalimae is potentially lethal (the person was saved from several weeks of medical treatment), and it comes from the Bartonella genus of proteobacteria, that is known to infect hundreds of thousands of people every year (and this is sometimes fatal).
3562:(i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the
549:"Knowledge is not censored" argument, I get an impression that they imagine themselves being bravely radical, heroically opposing those censors who want to burn our books and make our girls wear skirts down past the knee. Perhaps we need to realize is that there is not a threat of Big Brother, and we need to stop imagining
609:
as much absolutism and ferocity as the former. Hopefully that doesn't sound too bitter. But, I invite you to return, assuming that you tone down the incivility, and eliminate altogether the legal threats. Just browse around some discussion pages to get used to the pattern and tone of interaction between editors.
2132:
kind. I am simply trying to fight the POV deletions by several editors that believe the article should not even exist. Please explain why this white-washing of the authorship issue, by editors who want to censor material, is up to Wiki standards. I really do want to understand the reasoning behind this.
2946:
UPDATE: Warren has called me patently idiotic, all-caps, poor-grammar, and factually incorrect. He really needs to be blocked, and I've had enough of this edit war against him. I need someone like you who is an administrator to intervene. He said that I was trying to picture him as a vandal. It looks
2926:
This is my first refferal to a
Knowledge Administrator and you were one of the first on the list. My message here is that User Warren has been significantly editing the Windows 7 page without justification, and has called me "Obtuse" and "Disruptive" when I undid those edits. User Soctr has also been
2407:
Yeah, that's fine. You may want to add it back, with evidence to the reliability article -- because I removed it from there, for the same reasons. I'm a little overzealous, perhaps when watching recent changes, and looked at a from a certain viewpoint it could look like someone annoyed with wikipedia
2131:
Adam - for example - there was several sections, referenced to Mark
Anderson's book, that these editors have recently deleted. Properly referenced material from the same book you just added info from. Material that has been there for months and months. So you see, I am not "adding" material of any
2048:
Hi. Sorry you've been dragged into this. It's true, I have an expertise and I make edits about what I know. Felsommerfeld wrote the following about this article: "*I mean why are we even having this discussion? The guy from
Stratford wrote it all, period." If he had his way there would be no article
944:
Thanks for letting me know : ) Things are swamped around here, so I put up half of the material a day or two ago, and completely forgot about the rest. I need to whip myself into shape with this-- I'm finding myself using boring, banal quotes and featured articles like "William
Shakespeare". Thanks
548:
I gotta tell you guys I'm really on the fence here. Firstly, in terms of the issue itself, I sort-of agree with him. Would using a linkimage be so bad? Is this an issue of censorship, or an issue of hiding a graphic image from those who don't want to (or shouldn't)see it? From those who argue the
152:
is much more helpful than linking to the original document. I can't think of any reason why you wouldn't want this information to be included other than because of a partiality to Webb or a desire to censor
Knowledge. Is it not more poignant (and accurate) to speak of the horrible scene rather than
3708:
that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped
2447:
Hi, I'm glad to see that that there is some progress on the frontier of article validation. I've always been a supporter of the idea, but I always thought it would be struck down by those who treasure the encyclopedia's open-access to all over its reliability. I'm glad to see another
Wikipedian so
2151:
BTW - I like what you had to say re: "Intriguing, but few of us at Knowledge are without biases and I don't discredit them for being Oxfordian- it just means they are interested in, passionate, and informed about this subject. If they simply wish to help the encyclopedia by fine-tuning the Oxfordian
2121:
Adam - the status quo you refer to was what has been up on the page from Nov of last year. Only in the last 5 days have these 2 editors, and one banned sockpuppet, deleted bunches of long-standing material, all Oxfordian or Anti-Stratfordian. If you scan the article for the last 8 months, you will
2109:
OK, here's the real test of who the villain is. Type smatprt into google and read through a few pages. I'll guarantee that you'll find that he's been complained about and banned on forums not only for 3PP but also for editing without consensus. His style is to try to get those who complain about him
2062:
Felsommerfeld's accusations of sockpuppetry have gone way too far. He knows, as do the actual long-time editors of this article (of which he is not), that Ben Jonson and I are two very different individuals that happen to see eye to eye on the authorship issue. Feel free to investigate, research or
1916:
Hi Adam, I was happy to get involved in a new area. I hope my activity there was useful. I mostly limited myself to ensuring that new text was properly cited. There seems to be an interesting question involving which sources can be considered reliable references for psuedoscience articles. Obviously
458:
I enjoyed and appreciate your response, and will do my best to remove the caps. It is my opinion that any retail outlet in the US should be able to sell a printed version of this site. I do not think that is the wrong way to go. That would not allow it to be sold in all countries, but it would be
372:
That seems perfect, especially combined with the first warning, which was a brilliant excercise in civilty and good faith. If he is really interested in contributing here, your warning will certainly steer him in the right direction; if not, then at least he was warned. Thanks for looking into this;
330:
That seems perfect, especially combined with the first warning, which was a brilliant excercise in civilty and good faith. If he is really interested in contributing here, your warning will certainly steer him in the right direction; if not, then at least he was warned. Thanks for looking into this;
166:
is being used to support those words) and then let the reader follow the link, if he/she is so inclined, rather than stick vivid details from an adult novel into the middle of a biographical article that may well be read by a twelve-year old . Perhaps that makes me old-fashioned; so be it. I'd say
3157:
deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page
2576:
Hey Adam, see my responses to all this, too. I tried to keep some legitimate edits that came in during the work of MDC, and clarified some language. I also removed the term "intelligent stirrup" from the article so no copyright problems. I am OK with also removing any other "Kleenex versus Facial
2141:
And for full disclosure - yes, I have fallen into a few edit wars and even been banned twice (one deserved and one split decision), both of which I regret. Both were with rabid Stratdordians who were attempting to make mass deletions of properly referenced material. So in this case, what is to be
608:
as rigid as it seems; you've touched on an issue dear to many, and that is censorship. Though unfortunately, "censorship" in terms of book burning and Big Brother has been woefully muddled with censorship in terms of nudity and obscenity, and the liberal mindset has been applied to the latter with
179:
As for a partiality to Webb, I personally think it's totally absurd (and an act of desperation on the part of the Allen campaign) to hold an author responsible for what is in his/her fictional writings, particularly those set in the past -- but I've haven't expressed that opinion in the talk pages,
2636:
I agree with your recent deletion of sources that are not RS. That particular website is so POV (and so angry) that I am surprised it has resurfaced. Presently, there are one or 2 defenders who have reverted both you and I. I don't want to break the 3R rule so I'm done for the present. Perhaps
2560:
I added enhanced comments regarding the lack of ergonomic tendancies of traditional stirrups and named a patented invention that overcomes some of stirrup's basic design flaws and inherent dangers. To mention a patented product is no more commercial advertising than mentioning a Peacock Stirrup, a
2173:
Adam - this is what I posted on the WS project page: "Mass deletions of material from Shakespeare Authorship Question article" As a regular editor to all things Shakespeare, you all know (and many are sickened) by my interest in the Authorship Question. My last (and first) year here at WP has been
583:
will never succeed in it's goals if individuals are able to use legal intimidation to quash not only our articles and images, but the very conversations between editors. Even so, I feel like I came close to incivility myself in this case (possibly even crossed the line, but I don't think so). I'll
433:
That Knowledge chooses to do so when I can find no group of democratically elected, theocratic, authoritarian, or oligarchic government that allows it should at least speak to MY point. Please, if there are a group of school children that are shown these images, let me know what it is, otherwise,
305:
Before the situation worsens, I'll do as the above user did and remind you that we are not censored. The facts, regardless of how obscene, will be part of Knowledge. It has also come to my attention that you have been "reminding" people of the law regarding child pornography or something of that
2561:
break away stirrup, or a tapadero as the name for the enhanced stirrup is instrumental in the understanding of the feature. The MDC Stirrup can be accessed with the Patents and Trademarks Office and I hope you would consider their being called by name as no more than a reference to the invention.
1399:
Thank you for experimenting with the page Conor Oberst on Knowledge. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for
523:
Xchanters responses to the warnings seem to confirm my initial diagnosis of trollishness. Using formalities like "Dear Sir" at the head of an insulting post indicates that he's really missing the point. Sorry I dropped this on your plate Adam, but hey, that's what they pay you the big $ $ $ for,
471:
I will look at the link you mentioned, but it is my intention to fix THIS link. My best wishes for your studies. Wolfram's book "A New Kind of Science" should be essential reading for you. It took me twice to get what the Principle of Computational Equivalence meant. Work it out for yourself.
447:
I almost agree with you. However the manner in which you are addressing the situation, namely by writing in all caps and suggesting legal recourse is what you need to address. You can try to persuade people to your viewpoint, but please do so civilly. Your best option is probably to argue that
147:
Hi John. There seems to be a tendency for people to reject an analogy because the two sides of it are not exactly the same. The point I was trying to make was that the details are important in that they indicate the degree of graphicness in these novels. To link to it and require the reader to
556:
Secondly, in terms of how he has been addressing the issue, I certainly see legal threats and incivility. Perhaps the block was justified, perhaps not. However after talking to him, I did see an ability for rational discussion, and all the block seems to be doing is give him an impression of a
2931:
would be nice. This letter should include a statement like this: "You are disallowed from editing Microsoft Windows Articles pages until you agree to stop inappropriate behavior. A violation of this agreement will result in a permanent ban on editing." Warren should be banned until he keeps his
770:
were made to a significantly outdated version of the one found here. It also contained inaccurate information (e.g., that there is a logic with a truth value of "unknown") and had wikilinks to non-existent categories (e.g., "Category:CZ Live"). I reverted your changes because of these problems.
574:
I appreciate you offering Xchanter some support and encouragement at this point. I think that kind of thing is an important follow-up to the warn/block process, but it almost never happens. For any editor that's not totally incorrigable, some positive reinforcement and open dialogue will almost
409:
case that went exactly that way; an editor made 3 or 4 explicit threats on their own Talkpage and got shutdown practically mid-diatribe. Happily, this one is nowhere near that volatile and I'm pretty sure you got his attention :) Thanks Adam. So how is life as an Admin anyway? Do you make your
655:
I disagree with your rationale for restoring Xchanter's legal threats. You state that they are not at any one person. They are, actually, targetting everyone who has edited those pages, and it is quite clearly a legal threat. If you look at his contribution history, he has singled out a few
704:
Firstly, he is indefinitely blocked but can post to his talkpage, but let's not taunt him to do so. Secondly, it is normal when an editor makes a legal threat that they be blocked. If he wants to be unblocked he can request to do so, but we don't go around reposting his legal threat for him.
2288:
One user posted to justify this:"Unofficial translations or not, the material itself remains official. If the material contains important information on production/character conception, etc., it should be included. If we merely dismiss these translations as "unofficial," then we dismiss all
620:
As a note of clarification, the block had nothing to do with his thoughts on censorship. It was a disruption block because the user was making repeated legal threats, attempting to intimidate users on their talk pages, and repeatedly blanking warnings against that exact behavior. -
2063:
whatever you need to do to confirm this. For starters, BenJonson lives fulltime on the east coast, I on the west. Check our IP's or whatever (I am not that technical to know how you check, but I know you can and immediately clear this up and stop Felsommerfeld from his one-man war.
2396:
Thank you for welcoming me with that template, but I am actually an administrator and I'm familiar with policy. I re-added the sentence with a citation. If you still disagree, please discuss it with me on my talk page or the article talk page before removing it. Thanks,
575:
certainly help them become a more productive contributor. I know I had become quite agitated when this flurry of activity occurred; the issue of legal threats is my personal "zero tolerance" issue. While statements like "I'll contact my congressman" are pretty clearly not a
288:
I was going to AN/I to report a troll making some vague legal threats on multiple pages but it looks like you might be online right now. Would it be improper to bring it to your attention? If you are willing to look at it, please review the last 3 or 4 "contributions" from
2169:
Sorry to be writing so much, but you suggested " breaking down huge edits into a series of smaller ones." I tried that, readded several deleted sections, asking for discussion. None came, only continued reverts by Felsommerfeld and Hangemhigh. So what is the next step?
802:
category that did not belong, but in the course of doing so I clarified the opening paragraph significantly for those who are not philosophy graduate students (you) or philosophy majors (me). Anyway, once I get some spare time, I'll try to work out a compromise. Thanks,
850:
Okay, but the regardless of which version was used, either from last week or 1500 BC, it seems to me that the only relevant factor is which changes were made. We have addressed most of those, however. Again, I will make some hopefully-non-controvsial changes soon
2236:. If you have anything you'd like to say on the subject, now is the time. If you know of any other editors who might have something to say on the subject, pass the word. If, on the other hand, you are not interested in the slightest, feel free to delete this. —
3672:(i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the
3483:
but only 4 admins use it. We also used the API for getting the gender field in the profile but, out of 1744 admins, only around 400 have filled this field. But we would benefit from a larger coverage, i.e. possibly knowing the gender of 100% of candidates.
3038:. I would request you to kindly go through the article and please let us know your views/opinion at the talk page of the article so that npov, balance and undue weight concerns may be looked into and a consensual solution may be found. Thanks
1921:, but some of the sources in question were clearly more ...scholarly...than others. I plan to look at more articles along these lines to see if there is any consistency regarding general sourcing of info. Thanks, and I hope you're having fun!
314:
given the way in which you've voiced your opinions. So, before this gets worse (maybe resulting in a penalty, I'd ask you to contact me or any other editor in good standing for a way to resolve the issue, rather than continuing in the same
4628:
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to
4494:
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to
4360:
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to
4096:
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to
3963:
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to
3792:
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to
3113:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
2003:
who, in my opinion, has been intent on rewriting the Shakespeare Authorship article for the last year to promote his view that the Earl of Oxford was Shakespeare. I am only interested in article balance. See here for the list of his edits
2284:
page, which uses a majority of sources are from this fan source. They also do not question the translation what so ever and are not citing the foreign-language original. If they cited the original, maybe I wouldn't have such a problem.
793:
Hello Simoes. Logically speaking, you seem to be overstating the degree of change I exacted upon the article. Let me address each of your points individually. As to whether or not there is a 3rd truth value in some logic, please see
3159:
1194:
Although having the newsletter appear on everyone's userpage is desired, this may not be ideal for everyone. If, in the future, you wish to receive a link to the newsletter, rather than the newsletter itself, you may add yourself to
434:
you are "breaking new ground" and telling the rest of the world that it is wrong. Do you show these pictures to your own children? No, you are a freshman in college, and I WAS ONE ONCE TOO. Have some children and see how you feel.
2049:
on the authorship question at all. Since he cannot kill the article he is trying to edit out anything which challenges his position, including deleting whole sections without input or discussion. Now you know...the rest of the story.
2752:
I am trying to find a wikipedia administrator who would readily do an interview for a research project I am conducting from the perspective of a wikipedia insider. If you'd like to do this, please email me at goat77 (AT) gmail.com
2152:
viewpoint, then that is fine. But, as I'm sure you would agree, bias only becomes a problem when contributors fail to have a respect for neutrality. For example, even as a devout skeptic I still manage to have a neutral debate with
812:
This doesn't address my first point; videlicet, you effectively reverted to a month-old version of the article and made changes from there. As for your point about trivalent logics, I never claimed there to be no such thing. What I
3709:
for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the
4665:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
4531:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
4397:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
4133:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
4000:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
3829:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
208:? Seriously, congratulations! I have no doubt you will be a great Admin. Also, thanks for your kind note when my father was having heart surgery. He's finally back at home, and I'm finally back on WP. See you in the trenches :) --
3665:
3605:
3555:
1012:
is a new Esperanza program! In an effort to make complicated processes on Knowledge easier for everyone, Esperanza working to create and compile a list of tutorials about processes here on Knowledge. Consider writing one!
3395:
2017:
Good of you to post on the Shakespeare Authorship discussion page. You MUST read the Life and Times of BenJonson (a Wiki editor here) which is above your post on that page. It should tell you everything you need to know.
2947:
like it but I am really denouncing what he put in as vandalism. It has gone to this extent. This is the fifth time I've warned him to stop his behavior. But I am not an administrator so I need to turn to someone who is.
2651:
WikiProject Poetry is having a revival and we are trying to determine who is still active in the project. If you are, please answer this roll call by placing an *asterisk* next to your name on the list of participants
2502:
Adam, thanks for the input I respect your opinion. However your latest comment seems to have affected the list formatting somewhat - i.e. the number restarts after your comment. Can I ask you to take a look? Thanks.
2314:, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection
386:
listening to my roommates blaring rap. Yea let me know if this guy gets any worse. I titled the message "Vagina/pornography/children". That should get his attention-- Yea these kinds of things usually end up at
4188:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
798:. It seems to be very obscure (the only mention I've heard of it is through a passing comment by my TA). Secondly, you used the plural to overstate the situation relating to irrelevant categories. I inserted
2553:
Per your comments, I have added information in the stirrup section and, yes, I am the inventor of the MDC Stirrups(R). I have over 35 years of equestrian background and have been a judge at two Olympic Games.
2408:
over this, and adding it to multiple articles because they were pissed. Obviously, this is not the case. Part of the problems with doing this all the time is I assume a little less good faith than I should...
1783:
in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
2927:
irked by this. I've given him three warnings and now it is time for a refferal. I think this user deserves a permanent ban on editing any page (excluding the talk page) about Microsoft Windows. A message to
2098:
By the way - thank you for the Mark Anderson reference. The article used to have many, but ALL have been cut by Felsommerfeld in the last few days. I restored some today and await your input. Best regards
1818:
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on
218:
DOC! Welcome back-- I just got back from playing football outside and I'm filthy, so I need to take a shower, but I'm glad to see you back (and you father). Adminship is fun, and I like being able to block
1504:
I hope that you have a wonderful New Year and will party all night long. If you don't celebrate New year at this time well then happy early or late New Year and I still advise that you have a good time
1284:
Hi, I saw you participated in pages related to radio. I just wanted a little bit of help to correct an article I've tried to translate from French. It's about a French independent Internet radio called
2707:
is at least somewhat revived, with a couple people contributing and a good number of new articles. See the new article list on the main webpage of the project. Hope you can return and participate!
817:
say is that there is no trivalent logic with a truth value of "unknown" (or, at least, there is none across which I've ever come). If you could cite one, that would be great. The reliability of the
1947:. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:
2078:
Smatprt is smart enough to use different IP addresses. Please check out the Shakespeare Authorship discussion about user BenJonson and read the evidence in detail. You can form your own opinion. (
2618:" made me think that if I did get consensus supporting my opinion, that the editor would just revert anyway, as he seems to think he does not need consensus. I considered making a complaint re.
1244:. Let me emphasize that it is perfectly fine if you don't release it in a free license compatible with wikipedia, it just means someone else will have to drive down there and take a new picture.
1885:
1400:
your understanding. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Adambiswanger1 20:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
2434:, and I expect to know rather more after being there, since article validation is a major conference theme and several key WMF people will be at the conference. Ask me again in six weeks!
1259:
Hahah, I knew you'd like that bathroom. Nope, I haven't had any of those professors... I was up there over Halloween weekend. It was about as insane of a time that I've ever had. Enjoy! -
3472:), I'm starting an empirical research on "Gender and votes in requests for adminship". For this reason, we need to know the gender of Wikipedians who were candidated to become admins.
2564:
If you feel that my comments are untrue, please advise as my purpose was to inform and educate as well as name the product (my invention) that remains noteworthy in the stirrup world.
1888:
2430:. As far as I understand it, the code has recently been finished and they are going into testing mode right now. We expect to see it here on en in a few months. I will be going to
2614:" which did make me think that just going ahead and editing it, might be better than trying to discuss it, when all I was getting was abuse in response to my requests. Also reading "
510:
article. Honestly, I think I've remained civil, although he seems to disagree (and do let me know if you also believe I crossed the line). But given his last message on my talk page
4246:
656:
editors in specific and his text appears to be attempting to menace them. As a result, I'm removing it again not because of 'censorship', but because it's the right thing to do.
3057:
Can you talk to scarian, he is making it impossible to edit pages, he is evil and he doesn't want to talk about even. He accuses me of being Be Black Hole Sun. Please help me. --
2886:, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Knowledge.
4714:
3389:
3255:
168:
4709:
1712:
1708:
1697:
405:
line in a big way, it doesn't even get to ArbCom...the perma-block can be almost instant. Part of what caught my interest is that I had just spent some time reading through an
4283:
1884:
It was only officially published in the New England Journal of Medicine yesterday, so it has not been covered by that many newspapers or news websites as of now. Anyway, see
2557:
The article clearly shows traditional stirrups and plastic stirrups in the background. The article refers to other types of stirrups and mentions their considered benefits.
2968:
He said those things about your "attempts to brand as some kind of vandal", not you. Calling an edit vandalism, and calling an editor a vandal are really the same thing.
1656:
You have contributed a nice picture of the Wanamaker console, thanks for this. Do you have it available in a higher resolution? Would be great to see some more details.
1103:, those involved in translation projects will be asked what English Knowledge policies are most important and confusing to editors coming from other language Wikipedias.
4584:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
4450:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
4316:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
4052:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
3919:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
2315:
741:. VoABot will automatically list such protected pages only if there is a summary. Do not remove this notice until a day or so, otherwise it may get reposted. Thanks.
249:. VoABot will automatically list such protected pages only if there is a summary. Do not remove this notice until a day or so, otherwise it may get reposted. Thanks.
133:
I'm also posting somewhat similar comments on the talk page; feel free to respond there or here, or both; I'm not going to mention your edit summary there, however.
183:
Regarding analogies, some are enlightening and some are totally off the mark. It's probably not particularly useful to debate where on the spectrum yours falls.
3748:. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
2426:
Actually, things are very much happening, thankfully - though a lot of the activity is over at the German Foundation chapter. The active page on en right now is
1825:. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
4596:
4462:
4328:
4064:
3931:
3760:
4655:
4521:
4387:
4123:
3990:
3819:
2437:
By the way, I see you're at Syracuse University - I teach at SUNY Potsdam, not so far away! Let me know if you organize any meetups over there. Cheers,
2232:
3915:
2883:
2871:
2292:
But this is making me question wikipedia's reliability, as we are supposed to be an encyclopedia. Is this wrong? Or is there another way to solve this?
448:
this is not censoring, or that this is a case in which the obscenity is so great that a minor measure to make it invisible to children would be proper.
1683:
Hi Adam, I presumed that the link was added before the template below it was added, and the dupe link had not be noticed - so I was removing it as per
2496:
1812:
1057:
2704:
1567:
Any chance you can block this IP to only allow registered accounts? You and I have both been reverting. Vandalism is too slow to list at AIV. --
737:
this page but did not give a protection summary. If this is an actual (not deleted) article, talk, or project page, make sure that it is listed on
245:
this page but did not give a protection summary. If this is an actual (not deleted) article, talk, or project page, make sure that it is listed on
3323:
2727:
1659:
1053:
4587:
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
4453:
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
4319:
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
4055:
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
3922:
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
2976:
1383:
Thanks-- yea I protected it as soon as it went blank because there was a flurry of vandalism, but I fixed it seconds after that. Thanks again,
4675:
4541:
4407:
4143:
4010:
3839:
3652:
2739:
2671:
1826:
535:
Xchanter has been blocked for 24 hours. At this point he is being watched by at least one Admin and probably more. Thanks for your efforts. --
1289:. If you have a bit of time to have a look at the grammar, the spelling and the general style of this article, that would be great. Thanks,
4213:
1373:
Hi I think that you have protected the page in a vandalised form (blanc page). Please have a look and revert to a previous version. Thanks
506:) (since you've been involved with him also). I have tried to engage him and explain to him the rationale for inclusion of pictures in the
101:
3673:
3613:
3563:
2961:
Warren does explain how his edits are justified, although something needs to be done about his incivility and profanity. I don't think a
4683:
4610:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
4549:
4476:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
4415:
4342:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
4151:
4078:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
4018:
3945:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
3847:
3774:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
3228:
3223:
2992:
2890:
2797:
1830:
1663:
1420:
1241:
274:
It's nice to know I'm on your watchlist; that was some quick work. Of course I'll be LMAO if you, Mr. Admin, get the same warning :) --
35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.
4279:
4224:
3884:
3865:
3410:
3232:
2879:
2223:
1082:
1008:
984:
969:
57:
52:
47:
3289:
article is. There can't be one without the other, and alot of people are not even sure what the words "canon" and "non-canon" mean. (
1620:
Just got back online after being off for a few days and I see that the anon is back at it. Can you please consider another block? --
3530:
3377:
1804:
3215:
2603:
thanks for the intervention in the bong, popular culture issue. just in case you miss it, I will paste my response here as well.
2142:
done? Decent relevent material simply vanishing because 2 or 3 editors work in tandem to revert together and avoid the 3R rule?
1528:
1474:
1336:
1196:
908:, so I would suggest reverting the addition if the linked article isn't up to par. (I can't do so due to a solemn if silly vow
4209:
2219:
1789:
1771:
1216:
162:
I very much believe in linking to original documents. But I prefer to say "graphic sexual details", if that is the case (and
3340:
2971:
This administrator does not edit very often, so I do not expect him to read this anytime soon. I recommend listing Warren on
2875:
2688:
2326:
tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. --
2227:
1845:
503:
2358:
Welcome to Knowledge. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without
2215:
2208:
3751:
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
3445:
Greetings and long time no chat! I was wondering if you were still active here, as I had a few questions for you. Thanks.
1611:
for a while, and I blocked him for 1 week. Hopefully this'll do the trick. Thanks for keeping me updated on the situation
4659:
4651:
4580:
4525:
4517:
4446:
4391:
4383:
4127:
4119:
3994:
3986:
3823:
3815:
3122:
2241:
1070:
27:
3371:
3254:
for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
1219:
is your fathers work. However, currently you have the imaged tagged as fair use and thus currently fail criteria #1 at
148:
read through it is not nearly as helpful as stating it directly in the article, just as explaining the provisions of the
4275:
2768:
2577:
Tissue" names for other designs that are in there and replae them with generic terms if they are pointed out. However,
1268:
839:
781:
4200:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
2726:
Not sure how involved you are with Knowledge as a whole, but here's something you might find particularly interesting:
4205:
2972:
2427:
1780:
1349:
1223:. Is it possible to license it like the other organ images? Otherwise it should be deleted as a replaceable. Thanks,
2485:
is having its featured article status reviewed at the moment. It would be a shame to lose one of the few poetry FAs.
204:
I can't believe I missed your RfA! Will you use your new Admin powers to block me if I go into the archive and add a
3367:
3285:
page back 2006. However, I recently ressurrected the article. I strongly feel that it is needed just as much as the
1811:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject,
124:
We can't downplay how graphic and, well, sick some of this stuff is. That would be like saying "people died in WWII"
4679:
4644:
4637:
4545:
4510:
4503:
4411:
4376:
4369:
4147:
4112:
4105:
4014:
3979:
3972:
3843:
3808:
3801:
2847:
2736:
2363:
1315:
872:
Your recent rewording lost the bolded link to an updated article. Could you reword again to retrieve it? Thanks,
604:
Xchanter, your block will expire soon (or maybe it already has). Consider this not an assurance that Knowledge is
553:
when someone utters the word "censorship". This is a case of putting an image behind a door; and not a locked one.
2186:
I hope that you can find time to read the testimony of many aggrieved editors on the Administrator's Noticeboard.
1240:
and decide if there is a more suitable tag. If you have questions about your father's rights and wishes ask here:
3503:
3081:
3062:
3019:
on 'Allegations of Human Rights violation against the Indian Army' under 'criticism of the operation' section in
2898:
2622:
but wondered if talking to him about it, might be a better choice. I dont think that has got me very far as yet."
2581:
happens to be a Spanish word that is several hundred years old, so I'd hardly say that one has a copyright on it.
1684:
4048:
3669:
3609:
3559:
3498:
Thus, would you be so kind to write your gender , together with a text comment if you want, on my talk page at
3488:
3417:
3348:
2853:; a more generally-applicable template? I see that the lit. criticism template is used only on one article...
2379:
2359:
1108:
1093:
1023:
303:
So how bad is the situation? If he's just started acting this way, I was thinking about leaving this message:
188:
180:
and I've tried to keep it out of my edits. If it's a controversy, that is a fact, and deserves to be included.
138:
105:
3330:
policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure
126:. Please note the following: giving something (in this case a press release) undue weight is a violation of
1667:
3880:
3869:
3625:
3575:
3058:
2988:
2837:
2801:
2371:
2276:
fans are using a fan translation of a Official book only published in Japan for citations. The site is seen
1430:
1416:
1367:
3534:
2856:
I see that you are not very active on WP any more so I will wait a few days before declaring "time out". --
579:
threat, any posting to the effect of "you can/will be arrested for saying that" is absolutely intolerable.
3892:
3219:
3163:
3077:
3043:
1943:
I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States:
1687:. It probably would be a good idea to redesign the template to make the link in there more prominent? --
1523:
1508:
1469:
1454:
1345:
916:
876:
74:
4238:
1374:
909:
4618:
4484:
4350:
4086:
3953:
3782:
3677:
3617:
3567:
2952:
2937:
2733:
1925:
1704:
1412:
513:
I just know I will lose my cool if I answer back, so your help and advice would be appreciated. Thanks,
4312:
3744:
2311:
2304:
2089:
I have no fear! And I guarantee you will find us two different users - or block me FOREVER - I mean it.
1944:
751:
Actually, robot, I was unprotecting it and ensuring that it would not be able to be moved by an anon.
3526:
3383:
3211:
3203:
3192:
3118:
2894:
2756:
2341:
1982:
1408:
1353:
1233:
913:
873:
826:
149:
97:
3185:
459:
a good step forward. The baseline here appears to be the unpublishable, which I find unacceptable.
4201:
3403:
3358:
3020:
2962:
2730:
2623:
2449:
2398:
2321:
2156:
enthusiasts at that article, and even though I fiercely disagree with them I manage to acknowledge
1897:
1872:
1634:
1621:
1612:
1599:
1578:
1568:
1533:
1479:
1384:
1149:
946:
892:
852:
804:
752:
716:
639:
610:
558:
493:
478:
462:
449:
437:
392:
321:
290:
260:
224:
184:
154:
134:
1286:
1278:
344:
Wow, he's actually got a mild deluge of relatively gentle warnings. If you think it would be like
4592:
4458:
4324:
4060:
3927:
3756:
3670:
provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year
3610:
provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year
3560:
provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year
3338:. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current
3335:
2984:
2827:
2814:
2682:
2195:
2111:
2079:
2033:
2019:
2007:
1842:
1776:
1716:
698:
686:
668:
629:
514:
497:
2336:
3902:
File permission problem with File:914u Statue of Johann Sebastian Bach, Eisenach, GER, 22 S.jpg
3149:
3128:
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
2910:
4611:
4477:
4343:
4177:
4168:
4079:
3946:
3888:
3775:
3713:. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through
3514:
3499:
3450:
3431:
3331:
3294:
3039:
2874:. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Knowledge uses a set of
2712:
2375:
1518:
1464:
1340:
1332:
1169:
1123:
990:
167:
the same thing about Lynne Cheney and her "lesbian love affair, brothels and attempted rapes";
70:
259:
Just protecting it from IP/new user moves after having unprotected it completely, robot man.
4197:
4181:
3492:
2980:
2948:
2933:
2764:
2533:
2281:
1922:
1264:
905:
821:
article, however, seems dubious at best (it cites exactly one source, it incorrectly labels
585:
536:
525:
411:
388:
374:
349:
332:
294:
275:
220:
209:
4196:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2791:
Please check them out, I tagged them so ban me if I am wrong. They qualaify to be deleted.
1813:
requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license
3855:
3705:
3480:
3188:
3171:
3133:
2295:
1974:
1952:
1733:
1165:
1115:
901:
657:
311:
2878:
to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from
2637:
you could explain your edit on the talk page where I have recently done the same. best -
2528:
All admins are automatically approved so you should already be able to use AWB. Regards,
2458:
2378:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with
2272:
I'm sorry to complain like this and I have never really had to compain on wiki, but many
1122:
as life is rather busy; his spot will be filled by the runner up from the last election,
430:
Which country in the world shows their teenage children pictures of erect male genitals?
4672:
Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
4538:
Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
4404:
Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
4140:
Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
4007:
Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
3836:
Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
4193:
4185:
3688:
3633:
3583:
3028:
3024:
2866:
License tagging for Image:915h_Johannes_Gutenberg_(Gensfleisch)_statue,_Mainz,_1_Ma.jpg
2857:
2582:
2409:
2383:
2382:
please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you.
2327:
2256:
2157:
1893:
1868:
1237:
550:
345:
127:
4703:
4251:
4189:
3714:
3476:
3327:
3315:
3147:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
3114:
3110:
3015:
Hi, I and my fellow editors are facing a deadlock on a issue of removing/toning down
2889:
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on
2675:
2670:
Hi Adambiswanger1. Please consider adding your admin username to the growing list at
2514:
2504:
2462:
2438:
1834:
1630:
1591:
1299:
1245:
1224:
1220:
1161:
1033:
928:
818:
795:
727:
679:
661:
622:
406:
402:
307:
1497:
3719:
3710:
3595:
Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
3510:
3465:
3446:
3427:
3290:
3175:
3143:
3106:
3092:
2708:
2653:
2638:
2237:
2191:
2175:
2161:
2143:
2133:
2123:
2100:
2090:
2064:
2050:
2000:
1753:
1749:
1608:
1595:
1513:
1459:
1434:
1157:
1141:
1037:
738:
246:
163:
3545:
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
3249:
3883:
has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
2280:
where they get the translation from. Right now I am having problems w/ it on the
2255:
Can you delete the image so I can ricaricare this image including the license --
1335:
has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
900:
Hi Adam, There are already some comments about why an item that doesn't meet the
4691:
4557:
4423:
3469:
3344:
article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the
3109:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under
3032:
2760:
2529:
2486:
2273:
1319:
1311:
1260:
935:
830:
822:
772:
742:
250:
235:
4658:
justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See
4524:
justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See
4390:
justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See
4126:
justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See
3993:
justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See
3822:
justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See
3098:
1085:! Consider writing a tutorial on something you are good at doing on Knowledge.
983:
If you are an administrator, or even a generally experienced user, do consider
4695:
4561:
4427:
4293:
4260:
4217:
4162:
4155:
4029:
4022:
3896:
3859:
3851:
3725:
3690:
3637:
3587:
3538:
3518:
3454:
3435:
3298:
3265:
3196:
3167:
3085:
3066:
3047:
3036:
2996:
2956:
2941:
2902:
2860:
2805:
2772:
2742:
2716:
2693:
2660:
2641:
2626:
2587:
2537:
2517:
2507:
2489:
2465:
2452:
2441:
2412:
2401:
2386:
2330:
2298:
2259:
2245:
2198:
2178:
2164:
2146:
2136:
2126:
2114:
2103:
2093:
2082:
2067:
2053:
2036:
2010:
1989:
1960:
1930:
1903:
1878:
1852:
1756:
1719:
1691:
1671:
1637:
1624:
1615:
1602:
1581:
1571:
1541:
1487:
1437:
1387:
1377:
1358:
1322:
1293:
1272:
1248:
1227:
1173:
1153:
1145:
949:
938:
919:
895:
879:
855:
845:
807:
787:
755:
745:
719:
709:
706:
690:
672:
642:
633:
613:
588:
561:
539:
528:
517:
481:
465:
452:
440:
414:
395:
377:
352:
335:
324:
297:
278:
263:
253:
227:
212:
191:
157:
141:
109:
78:
20:
1707:
have been nominated for deletion. This is a renewal of the previously failed
153:
to speak of "incestuous sexual contact" or "sexual relations with his son"?
3681:
3629:
3579:
3282:
3272:
2657:
2367:
2153:
1910:
1688:
1590:
He came back after the block today. I see that you reverted and sprotected
1290:
887:
383:
3487:
So, after asking for advice to 3 admins and receiving 2 positive replies (
4606:
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to
4472:
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to
4338:
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to
4074:
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to
3941:
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to
3770:
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to
1547:
660:
exists for a reason, and I hope you'll reconsider reverting the change. -
1775:. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under
116:
4230:
3310:
2354:
2482:
2474:
85:
2619:
4687:
4553:
4419:
2928:
2431:
2277:
1607:
This guy is getting really annoying, isn't he? Anyway, I protected
1318:
articles (no need for future updates). If You need help then write,
2872:
Image:915h_Johannes_Gutenberg_(Gensfleisch)_statue,_Mainz,_1_Ma.jpg
3916:
File:914u Statue of Johann Sebastian Bach, Eisenach, GER, 22 S.jpg
3286:
866:
767:
507:
4567:
File permission problem with File:Hienrich Hoffman birthplace.jpg
4433:
File permission problem with File:String-Division-Middle-Sect.jpg
4184:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
3186:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Socionics
2608:
This one can't be integrated because it contains nothing but CRAP
2783:
3506:, the information will be kept confidential and never shared.
3502:? If you prefer to send me this information privately, you can
3314:
Hello Adambiswanger1! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
2786:
912:
as precondition of getting involved with ITN again.) Thanks,
293:. Otherwise, let me know and I'll bring it to AN/I. Thanks. --
15:
4266:
Nomination for deletion of Template:Books of the Hebrew Bible
4237:
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
1048:
963:
4570:
4436:
4302:
4229:
4038:
3905:
3734:
3153:
explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
3119:
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
3097:
1966:
1807:, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
1112:
is being held, with all thoughts of all Esperanzians wanted!
94:
Hey censor- My revision to Chris Wheelers page was correct
4624:
to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
4490:
to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
4356:
to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
4092:
to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
3959:
to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
3788:
to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
1798:
without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template
1711:. I'd really appreciate it if you'd share your opinion and
580:
3645:
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
1703:
Hi Adambiswanger1, several redirects to portals including
4284:
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page
3885:
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page
2616:
I don't have to obtain consensus before removing sections
934:
The portal needs some attention. If You have the time...
766:
The edits you copied over from another wiki's article on
2032:
Oh dear. Didn't you get the argument for sockpuppetry? (
492:
Hi. I'm wondering whether you can help me out regarding
4667:
4533:
4399:
4135:
4035:
File permission problem with File:Goethe birthplace.jpg
4002:
3831:
3701:
3245:
3241:
3237:
3016:
1863:
1821:
1337:
the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page
735:
511:
243:
4662:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
4528:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
4394:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
4130:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
3997:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
3826:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
3402:
2230:, and others, have been deleted. That deletion is now
3653:
Knowledge:Inactive administrators/2011#September 2011
3495:), we decided to try to ask directly to Wikipedians.
1452:
I Hope You Have A Happy New Year Adambiswanger1!!!!
1074:
has been updated, with some proposals being archived.
65:
Recently archived talk page. Feel free to post below
2612:
This IS an encyclopedia, go somewhere else with crap
1829:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
348:
him, don't feel like you're obligated to pile on. --
4682:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
4548:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
4414:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
4150:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
4017:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
3846:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
3700:Hello. You are receiving this message because of a
3117:, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please
4282:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
2344:comment was added at 00:05, August 25, 2007 (UTC).
1629:I noticed that you may be offline, so I posted at
1310:is a red link again. I would suggest looking into
4176:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
1752:, hereby award you the Barnstar of High Culture.
1748:For your efforts with pages involving poetry, I,
3322:of the articles that you created are tagged as
2335:Can you please look at my admin request. Thanks
2224:Category:Flying Spaghetti Monsterist Wikipedians
1189:
373:I hope I didn't tear you away from anything...--
331:I hope I didn't tear you away from anything...--
4676:section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion
4636:If you believe the media meets the criteria at
4542:section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion
4502:If you believe the media meets the criteria at
4408:section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion
4368:If you believe the media meets the criteria at
4104:If you believe the media meets the criteria at
3971:If you believe the media meets the criteria at
3800:If you believe the media meets the criteria at
2703:Hi Adambiswanger1 -- Just a note to claim that
2190:] What is the procedure for completely banning
885:Hi BanyanTree. The original version linked to
4299:File permission problem with File:Stopjamb.jpg
3731:File permission problem with File:Consolea.jpg
3111:section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion
2461:. Looks like things are beginning to happen.
1779:, but its use in Knowledge articles fails our
1211:Regarding Philadelphia_wanamakergrandcourt.jpg
3416:
3281:I understand that years ago, you deleted the
3144:the page that has been nominated for deletion
8:
4715:Wikipedians who opt out of template messages
2513:Never mind, another editor took care of it.
1394:Answer to your Comment to User 84.145.229.73
4710:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery
4245:redirect, you might want to participate in
3676:and the userright will be restored per the
3616:and the userright will be restored per the
3566:and the userright will be restored per the
2794:sorry for the typos, I got wikiwork to do.
2188:] Also here on the Fringe Theories board.
1197:Knowledge:Esperanza/Newsletter/Opt Out List
1109:discussion of Esperanza's role in Knowledge
86:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Montanabw
4241:. Since you had some involvement with the
3324:Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons
3166:the page or have a copy emailed to you.
2909:USER WARREN IS BEING INAPPROPRIATE ON THE
2620:http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Civility
1772:Image:Philadelphia wanamakergrandcourt.jpg
1765:Image:Philadelphia wanamakergrandcourt.jpg
1492:
1217:Image:Philadelphia_wanamakergrandcourt.jpg
1090:a cohesive look to all the Esperanza pages
726:BOT - Regarding your recent protection of
234:BOT - Regarding your recent protection of
170:political party has nothing to do with it.
31:. Adambiswanger1 has not edited Knowledge
3035:, the summary of dispute can be found at
2497:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Ronnotel
1815:, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
1020:how Esperanza relates to the encyclopedia
989:Admin Coaching, now being coordinated by
69:Why was the "Hard Rain" article removed?
4595:or another acceptable free license (see
4461:or another acceptable free license (see
4327:or another acceptable free license (see
4063:or another acceptable free license (see
3930:or another acceptable free license (see
3759:or another acceptable free license (see
2705:Knowledge:WikiProject Syracuse, New York
715:Okay. I don't see any reason to argue.
4601:at the site of the original publication
4591:make a note permitting reuse under the
4467:at the site of the original publication
4457:make a note permitting reuse under the
4333:at the site of the original publication
4323:make a note permitting reuse under the
4146:. You may wish to read the Knowledge's
4069:at the site of the original publication
4059:make a note permitting reuse under the
4013:. You may wish to read the Knowledge's
3936:at the site of the original publication
3926:make a note permitting reuse under the
3842:. You may wish to read the Knowledge's
3765:at the site of the original publication
3755:make a note permitting reuse under the
3668:in June 2011, consensus was reached to
3608:in June 2011, consensus was reached to
3558:in June 2011, consensus was reached to
2370:, is not consistent with our policy of
1502:
4652:Knowledge:File copyright tags#Fair use
4518:Knowledge:File copyright tags#Fair use
4384:Knowledge:File copyright tags#Fair use
4120:Knowledge:File copyright tags#Fair use
3987:Knowledge:File copyright tags#Fair use
3816:Knowledge:File copyright tags#Fair use
2784:http://en.wikipedia.org/Mini_gorrillas
2216:Category:Psuedoreligionist Wikipedians
2209:Category:Psuedoreligionist Wikipedians
1731:
3334:, all biographies should be based on
2977:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard
2893:. Thank you for your cooperation. --
2787:http://en.wikipedia.org/Minab_factory
2457:Adam, you may want to take a look at
1101:useful interlanguage welcome template
7:
4581:File:Hienrich Hoffman birthplace.jpg
4447:File:String-Division-Middle-Sect.jpg
4249:if you have not already done so. -
3123:notability guideline for biographies
2567:Thanks for your time and attention.
122:In your last edit summary, you said
4678:. You may wish to read Knowledge's
4650:or one of the other tags listed at
4544:. You may wish to read Knowledge's
4516:or one of the other tags listed at
4410:. You may wish to read Knowledge's
4382:or one of the other tags listed at
4118:or one of the other tags listed at
3985:or one of the other tags listed at
3814:or one of the other tags listed at
3475:We tried looking for the templates
2979:instead, but only if he disregards
2891:Knowledge:Media copyright questions
1999:I'd like to draw your attention to
1328:TfD nomination of Template:Complete
1242:Knowledge talk:Image copyright tags
678:Mongo beat me to it (see below). -
4276:Template:Books of the Hebrew Bible
3674:Knowledge:Bureaucrats' noticeboard
3614:Knowledge:Bureaucrats' noticeboard
3564:Knowledge:Bureaucrats' noticeboard
3468:) and, together with Paolo Massa (
3158:does get deleted, you can contact
3121:, as well as our subject-specific
1685:Knowledge:Guide to layout#See also
1404:I did not do anything to any page!
1118:informed everyone that he will be
310:, and most certainly as a case of
306:sort. This may be construed as a
14:
4202:review the candidates' statements
1917:they won't cite scientific-style
1794:{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
28:This user may have left Knowledge
4270:
3875:
3659:
3599:
3549:
3309:
2353:
1732:
1546:
1496:
1040:, for delivering the newsletter.
475:My best wishes for your future,
19:
2220:Category:Discordian Wikipedians
1972:Thanks and I hope you join up!
980:Admin Coaching needs coaches!!!
410:roommate call you "Sir" now? --
320:Think it would be appropriate?
4696:13:52, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
4684:Media copyright questions page
4562:13:52, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
4550:Media copyright questions page
4428:13:51, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
4416:Media copyright questions page
4223:The graduation song listed at
4208:. For the Election committee,
4178:Arbitration Committee election
4169:ArbCom elections are now open!
4152:Media copyright questions page
4019:Media copyright questions page
3848:Media copyright questions page
2843:to make way for a redirect of
2538:21:22, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
2518:19:46, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
2508:19:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
2490:02:22, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
2466:06:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
2453:14:11, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
2442:02:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
2413:17:54, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
2402:17:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
2387:17:39, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
2228:Category:SubGenius Wikipedians
1831:Media copyright questions page
1594:. Can you please do same for
382:Not at all-- I'm just reading
1:
4660:Knowledge:File copyright tags
4614:. If you take this step, add
4526:Knowledge:File copyright tags
4480:. If you take this step, add
4392:Knowledge:File copyright tags
4346:. If you take this step, add
4218:13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
4128:Knowledge:File copyright tags
4082:. If you take this step, add
3995:Knowledge:File copyright tags
3949:. If you take this step, add
3897:16:56, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
3860:21:07, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
3824:Knowledge:File copyright tags
3778:. If you take this step, add
3691:00:12, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
3638:14:04, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
3328:biographies of living persons
3067:10:21, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
2997:03:55, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
2957:00:04, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
2942:00:37, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
2717:00:49, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
2694:22:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
2214:As you may already be aware,
1698:Portal redirects for deletion
1542:22:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
1488:22:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
1447:
1359:18:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
1323:13:29, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
1314:and how it simply randomizes
1236:is a fair use tag. Look over
1120:leaving the Esperanza council
959:
956:November Esperanza Newsletter
638:Okay, no objections from me.
4631:permissions-en@wikimedia.org
4608:permissions-en@wikimedia.org
4497:permissions-en@wikimedia.org
4474:permissions-en@wikimedia.org
4363:permissions-en@wikimedia.org
4340:permissions-en@wikimedia.org
4261:10:47, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
4163:12:53, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
4144:criteria for speedy deletion
4099:permissions-en@wikimedia.org
4076:permissions-en@wikimedia.org
4011:criteria for speedy deletion
3966:permissions-en@wikimedia.org
3943:permissions-en@wikimedia.org
3840:criteria for speedy deletion
3795:permissions-en@wikimedia.org
3772:permissions-en@wikimedia.org
3726:00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
3436:20:02, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
3115:criteria for speedy deletion
3048:05:54, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
2965:would really help with this.
2903:02:51, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
2861:23:31, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
2661:01:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
2647:WikiProject Poetry Roll Call
2642:14:17, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
2318:and feel free to remove the
1827:criteria for speedy deletion
1742:The Barnstar of High Culture
1709:deletion attempt on March 17
1495:
1438:06:46, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
1388:00:38, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
1378:00:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
1294:18:47, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
1273:03:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
1249:01:14, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
1228:00:54, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
1174:20:33, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1140:
950:17:53, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
939:15:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
920:23:51, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
896:23:13, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
880:22:53, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
856:00:14, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
846:23:45, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
808:23:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
788:19:29, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
756:20:33, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
746:19:20, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
720:20:34, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
710:21:56, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
691:21:57, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
673:21:56, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
643:16:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
634:15:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
614:15:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
589:17:23, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
562:15:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
540:06:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
529:05:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
518:05:45, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
482:05:10, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
466:04:05, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
453:03:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
441:03:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
415:03:33, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
396:03:23, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
378:03:10, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
353:03:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
336:03:10, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
325:03:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
298:02:45, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
279:19:52, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
264:02:08, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
254:02:02, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
228:19:59, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
213:19:03, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
192:00:33, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
158:19:59, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
142:13:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
110:00:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
4204:and submit your choices on
4030:07:35, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
3539:08:07, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
3519:12:51, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
3299:17:58, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
3266:20:00, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
2973:Knowledge:Wikiquette alerts
2627:14:53, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
2588:23:58, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
2331:21:25, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
1545:
4731:
4638:Knowledge:Non-free content
4504:Knowledge:Non-free content
4370:Knowledge:Non-free content
4210:MediaWiki message delivery
4106:Knowledge:Non-free content
4049:File:Goethe birthplace.jpg
3973:Knowledge:Non-free content
3802:Knowledge:Non-free content
3588:16:54, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
3023:article, concerns include
1919:peer-reviewed publications
1790:the image description page
1720:05:06, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
1672:11:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
1638:17:11, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
1625:00:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
651:Legal threats and Xchanter
4294:14:06, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
3197:19:18, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
3176:02:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
3105:A tag has been placed on
3086:17:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
2743:13:13, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
2524:Your AWB approval request
2299:18:14, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
2260:14:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
2246:10:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
2199:13:34, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
2179:04:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
2165:03:28, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
2147:03:28, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
2137:03:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
2127:03:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
2115:02:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
2104:01:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
2094:01:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
2083:01:47, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
2068:01:26, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
2054:01:26, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
2037:23:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
2011:16:38, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1967:http://wmfpa.blogspot.com
1805:the image discussion page
1738:
1692:01:14, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
1633:. Situation resolved. --
1616:16:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
1603:20:18, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
1582:03:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
1572:23:02, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
1088:The suggestion of adding
427:Ok, I am contacting you.
79:20:45, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
4225:Redirects for discussion
3711:bureaucrats' noticeboard
3464:Hi! I'm Liria Veronesi (
3455:20:05, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
2806:16:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
2773:18:06, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
2722:Phillies WikiProject...?
2672:Classification of admins
2666:Classification of admins
2380:Knowledge:Citing sources
2310:A template you created,
1990:02:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
1931:19:32, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
1904:17:53, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
1879:16:52, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
1853:17:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1781:first fair use criterion
1757:11:28, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
1024:please add your thoughts
985:signing up to be a coach
829:as ternary, et cetera).
4247:the redirect discussion
3866:Nomination for deletion
3354:tag. Here is the list:
2699:Syracuse rises again...
2268:Unofficial translations
2218:and its subcategories,
2122:see that I am correct.
1431:User talk:84.145.229.73
1368:Macedonia (terminology)
401:If someone crosses the
4575:
4441:
4307:
4280:nominated for deletion
4234:
4043:
3910:
3881:Template:Lit criticism
3870:Template:Lit criticism
3739:
3162:to request that they
3102:
2632:Shakespeare Authorship
2257:A cool night green owl
1995:Shakespeare authorship
1945:Wikimedia Pennsylvania
1936:Wikimedia Pennsylvania
1725:Barnstar: High Culture
1598:and/or block again? --
1096:if you are interested!
734:You recently protected
242:You recently protected
223:and intimidate them.
4578:Thanks for uploading
4574:
4444:Thanks for uploading
4440:
4310:Thanks for uploading
4306:
4233:
4182:Arbitration Committee
4046:Thanks for uploading
4042:
3913:Thanks for uploading
3909:
3742:Thanks for uploading
3738:
3101:
2870:Thanks for uploading
2374:. Take a look at the
1951:Contact us on IRC at
1769:Thanks for uploading
1662:comment was added by
1092:is being considered;
910:that I made to myself
4640:, use a tag such as
4506:, use a tag such as
4372:, use a tag such as
4108:, use a tag such as
3975:, use a tag such as
3804:, use a tag such as
3706:administrator policy
3678:re-sysopping process
3666:community discussion
3618:re-sysopping process
3606:community discussion
3568:re-sysopping process
3556:community discussion
2876:image copyright tags
2419:Stable versions, etc
1715:on this proposal. --
1234:Template:Promotional
827:paraconsistent logic
150:Treaty of Versailles
42:Archived discussions
33:since August 8, 2010
4243:The graduation song
4239:The graduation song
4186:arbitration process
3359:Bob Perkins (radio)
3256:the discussion page
3160:one of these admins
3091:Speedy deletion of
3021:Operation Blue Star
3011:Request for opinion
2823:Is it ok if I move
1792:and edit it to add
1255:Syracuse University
1215:Hi, I realize that
1099:In order to make a
1094:join the discussion
1054:The last AC meeting
4674:, as described in
4576:
4540:, as described in
4442:
4406:, as described in
4308:
4235:
4198:arbitration policy
4142:, as described on
4044:
4009:, as described on
3911:
3838:, as described on
3740:
3626:MessageDeliveryBot
3576:MessageDeliveryBot
3318:alerting you that
3278:Mr. Adambiswanger
3202:RfD nomination of
3103:
3090:
2342:signed but undated
1965:Visit our blog at
1705:The beatles portal
1022:has been started;
699:User talk:Xchanter
4645:non-free fair use
4511:non-free fair use
4377:non-free fair use
4313:File:Stopjamb.jpg
4257:
4113:non-free fair use
3980:non-free fair use
3809:non-free fair use
3745:File:Consolea.jpg
3641:
3591:
3529:comment added by
3523:your a asswhole
3500:User_talk:Akoha77
3422:
3305:Unreferenced BLPs
3271:Desire to return
3209:I have nominated
3059:This Feels Right2
2848:criticism section
2775:
2759:comment added by
2345:
2312:Template:Lysdexic
2305:Template:Lysdexic
1987:
1762:
1761:
1675:
1554:
1553:
1540:
1486:
1425:
1411:comment added by
1357:
1333:Template:Complete
1208:
1207:
1204:
1203:
1184:
1183:
1180:
1179:
1071:proposed programs
1045:
1044:
968:Program Feature:
683:
665:
626:
112:
100:comment added by
39:
38:
4722:
4680:image use policy
4649:
4643:
4623:
4617:
4573:
4546:image use policy
4515:
4509:
4489:
4483:
4439:
4412:image use policy
4381:
4375:
4355:
4349:
4305:
4291:
4289:Ten Pound Hammer
4274:
4273:
4255:
4160:
4148:image use policy
4117:
4111:
4091:
4085:
4041:
4027:
4015:image use policy
3984:
3978:
3958:
3952:
3908:
3879:
3878:
3844:image use policy
3813:
3807:
3787:
3781:
3737:
3722:
3696:Notice of change
3686:
3663:
3662:
3623:
3603:
3602:
3573:
3553:
3552:
3541:
3504:send me an email
3460:Survey on gender
3421:
3420:
3406:
3362:
3353:
3347:
3336:reliable sources
3313:
3264:
3253:
3235:
3139:
3138:
3132:
2852:
2846:
2842:
2836:
2832:
2826:
2819:
2813:
2754:
2691:
2685:
2680:
2585:
2366:, as you did to
2357:
2340:—The preceding
2339:
2282:Alessa Gillespie
1985:
1981:
1977:
1928:
1902:
1901:
1877:
1876:
1850:
1840:
1837:
1824:
1795:
1736:
1729:
1728:
1657:
1559:Happy New Year!
1550:
1539:
1538:
1536:
1531:
1526:
1521:
1516:
1511:
1506:
1500:
1493:
1485:
1484:
1482:
1477:
1472:
1467:
1462:
1457:
1424:
1405:
1343:
1271:
1190:
1186:
1185:
1049:
1018:A discussion on
972:(needs coaches!)
964:
960:
843:
785:
681:
663:
624:
95:
84:Retrieved from "
23:
16:
4730:
4729:
4725:
4724:
4723:
4721:
4720:
4719:
4700:
4699:
4668:your upload log
4647:
4641:
4621:
4615:
4571:
4569:
4534:your upload log
4513:
4507:
4487:
4481:
4437:
4435:
4400:your upload log
4379:
4373:
4353:
4347:
4303:
4301:
4287:
4271:
4268:
4254:
4228:
4206:the voting page
4172:
4156:
4136:your upload log
4115:
4109:
4089:
4083:
4039:
4037:
4023:
4003:your upload log
3982:
3976:
3956:
3950:
3906:
3904:
3876:
3873:
3832:your upload log
3811:
3805:
3785:
3779:
3735:
3733:
3720:
3698:
3682:
3660:
3647:
3600:
3597:
3550:
3547:
3524:
3481:User:UBX/female
3462:
3443:
3363:
3351:
3349:unreferencedBLP
3345:
3307:
3276:
3262:
3259:
3226:
3212:Perfect article
3210:
3207:
3204:Perfect article
3183:
3136:
3130:
3129:
3096:
3078:FireFoxUser2343
3074:
3055:
3013:
2916:
2895:ImageTaggingBot
2868:
2850:
2844:
2840:
2834:
2830:
2824:
2821:
2817:
2811:
2781:
2750:
2724:
2701:
2689:
2683:
2676:
2668:
2649:
2634:
2601:
2583:
2545:
2526:
2500:
2479:
2459:this blog entry
2432:this conference
2421:
2394:
2364:reliable source
2351:
2308:
2270:
2253:
2244:
2212:
1997:
1983:
1975:
1938:
1926:
1914:
1892:
1891:
1867:
1866:
1860:
1849:
1846:
1838:
1835:
1820:
1793:
1767:
1727:
1701:
1681:
1658:—The preceding
1654:
1652:Wanamaker Organ
1565:
1557:
1555:
1534:
1529:
1524:
1519:
1514:
1509:
1507:
1503:
1480:
1475:
1470:
1465:
1460:
1455:
1453:
1446:
1406:
1396:
1371:
1330:
1308:Did you know...
1304:
1282:
1263:
1257:
1213:
1176:
1135:
1077:There is now a
1061:
1041:
1032:Many thanks to
1001:
973:
958:
932:
870:
842:
836:
784:
778:
764:
732:
702:
653:
601:
490:
422:
365:Oops, too late.
286:
272:
240:
202:
120:
44:
12:
11:
5:
4728:
4726:
4718:
4717:
4712:
4702:
4701:
4626:
4625:
4604:
4568:
4565:
4492:
4491:
4470:
4434:
4431:
4358:
4357:
4336:
4300:
4297:
4267:
4264:
4252:
4227:
4221:
4175:
4171:
4166:
4094:
4093:
4072:
4036:
4033:
3961:
3960:
3939:
3903:
3900:
3872:
3863:
3850:. Thank you. —
3790:
3789:
3768:
3732:
3729:
3697:
3694:
3657:
3656:
3646:
3643:
3596:
3593:
3546:
3543:
3461:
3458:
3442:
3439:
3424:
3423:
3306:
3303:
3275:
3269:
3261:
3206:
3200:
3182:
3181:RFC: socionics
3179:
3095:
3089:
3073:
3070:
3054:
3051:
3012:
3009:
3008:
3007:
3006:
3005:
3004:
3003:
3002:
3001:
3000:
2999:
2969:
2966:
2915:
2906:
2867:
2864:
2820:
2809:
2780:
2777:
2749:
2746:
2723:
2720:
2700:
2697:
2667:
2664:
2648:
2645:
2633:
2630:
2624:Sennen goroshi
2600:
2597:
2595:
2593:
2592:
2591:
2590:
2544:
2541:
2525:
2522:
2521:
2520:
2499:
2495:Formatting at
2493:
2478:
2472:
2471:
2470:
2469:
2468:
2450:AdamBiswanger1
2420:
2417:
2416:
2415:
2399:AdamBiswanger1
2393:
2390:
2350:
2349:September 2007
2347:
2325:
2307:
2302:
2269:
2266:
2264:
2252:
2249:
2240:
2211:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2119:
2118:
2087:
2086:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2056:
2024:
2023:
2022:21:51, 11 July
1996:
1993:
1970:
1969:
1963:
1957:
1955:
1937:
1934:
1913:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1859:
1856:
1847:
1809:
1808:
1801:
1766:
1763:
1760:
1759:
1745:
1744:
1739:
1737:
1726:
1723:
1700:
1695:
1680:
1677:
1653:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1635:After Midnight
1622:After Midnight
1613:AdamBiswanger1
1600:After Midnight
1585:
1584:
1579:AdamBiswanger1
1569:After Midnight
1564:
1563:141.151.88.130
1561:
1556:
1552:
1551:
1544:
1501:
1491:
1490:
1449:
1448:
1445:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1395:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1385:AdamBiswanger1
1375:172.206.20.239
1370:
1365:
1363:
1339:. Thank you. -
1329:
1326:
1316:Selected breed
1303:
1297:
1281:
1276:
1256:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1212:
1209:
1206:
1205:
1202:
1201:
1182:
1181:
1178:
1177:
1172:
1150:Celestianpower
1137:
1136:
1133:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1113:
1104:
1097:
1086:
1083:Tutorial Drive
1075:
1063:
1062:
1052:
1046:
1043:
1042:
1036:, courtesy of
1031:
1028:
1027:
1015:
1014:
1009:Tutorial Drive
1003:
1002:
999:
996:
995:
975:
974:
970:Admin Coaching
967:
957:
954:
953:
952:
947:AdamBiswanger1
931:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
893:AdamBiswanger1
869:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
853:AdamBiswanger1
838:
805:AdamBiswanger1
780:
763:
760:
759:
758:
753:AdamBiswanger1
731:
724:
723:
722:
717:AdamBiswanger1
701:
695:
694:
693:
652:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
640:AdamBiswanger1
611:AdamBiswanger1
600:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
567:
566:
565:
564:
559:AdamBiswanger1
554:
551:Fahrenheit 451
543:
542:
532:
531:
489:
486:
456:
455:
450:AdamBiswanger1
421:
418:
399:
398:
393:AdamBiswanger1
380:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
358:
357:
356:
355:
339:
338:
322:AdamBiswanger1
318:
317:
308:a legal threat
285:
282:
271:
268:
267:
266:
261:AdamBiswanger1
239:
232:
231:
230:
225:AdamBiswanger1
201:
198:
197:
196:
195:
194:
185:John Broughton
181:
174:
173:
172:
171:
155:AdamBiswanger1
135:John Broughton
119:
114:
102:141.151.82.174
91:
62:
61:
60:
55:
50:
43:
40:
37:
36:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4727:
4716:
4713:
4711:
4708:
4707:
4705:
4698:
4697:
4693:
4689:
4686:. Thank you.
4685:
4681:
4677:
4673:
4669:
4663:
4661:
4657:
4653:
4646:
4639:
4634:
4632:
4620:
4613:
4609:
4605:
4602:
4598:
4594:
4590:
4589:
4588:
4585:
4583:
4582:
4566:
4564:
4563:
4559:
4555:
4552:. Thank you.
4551:
4547:
4543:
4539:
4535:
4529:
4527:
4523:
4519:
4512:
4505:
4500:
4498:
4486:
4479:
4475:
4471:
4468:
4464:
4460:
4456:
4455:
4454:
4451:
4449:
4448:
4432:
4430:
4429:
4425:
4421:
4418:. Thank you.
4417:
4413:
4409:
4405:
4401:
4395:
4393:
4389:
4385:
4378:
4371:
4366:
4364:
4352:
4345:
4341:
4337:
4334:
4330:
4326:
4322:
4321:
4320:
4317:
4315:
4314:
4298:
4296:
4295:
4290:
4285:
4281:
4277:
4265:
4263:
4262:
4259:
4258:
4248:
4244:
4240:
4232:
4226:
4222:
4220:
4219:
4215:
4211:
4207:
4203:
4199:
4195:
4191:
4187:
4183:
4179:
4170:
4167:
4165:
4164:
4161:
4159:
4154:. Thank you.
4153:
4149:
4145:
4141:
4137:
4131:
4129:
4125:
4121:
4114:
4107:
4102:
4100:
4088:
4081:
4077:
4073:
4070:
4066:
4062:
4058:
4057:
4056:
4053:
4051:
4050:
4034:
4032:
4031:
4028:
4026:
4021:. Thank you.
4020:
4016:
4012:
4008:
4004:
3998:
3996:
3992:
3988:
3981:
3974:
3969:
3967:
3955:
3948:
3944:
3940:
3937:
3933:
3929:
3925:
3924:
3923:
3920:
3918:
3917:
3901:
3899:
3898:
3894:
3890:
3886:
3882:
3871:
3867:
3864:
3862:
3861:
3857:
3853:
3849:
3845:
3841:
3837:
3833:
3827:
3825:
3821:
3817:
3810:
3803:
3798:
3796:
3784:
3777:
3773:
3769:
3766:
3762:
3758:
3754:
3753:
3752:
3749:
3747:
3746:
3730:
3728:
3727:
3724:
3723:
3717:. Thank you.
3716:
3712:
3707:
3703:
3702:recent change
3695:
3693:
3692:
3689:
3687:
3685:
3679:
3675:
3671:
3667:
3655:
3654:
3649:
3648:
3644:
3642:
3639:
3635:
3631:
3628:on behalf of
3627:
3624:Delivered by
3621:
3619:
3615:
3611:
3607:
3594:
3592:
3589:
3585:
3581:
3578:on behalf of
3577:
3574:Delivered by
3571:
3569:
3565:
3561:
3557:
3544:
3542:
3540:
3536:
3532:
3528:
3521:
3520:
3516:
3512:
3507:
3505:
3501:
3496:
3494:
3490:
3485:
3482:
3478:
3477:User:UBX/male
3473:
3471:
3467:
3459:
3457:
3456:
3452:
3448:
3440:
3438:
3437:
3433:
3429:
3419:
3415:
3412:
3409:
3405:
3401:
3397:
3394:
3391:
3388:
3385:
3382:
3379:
3376:
3373:
3369:
3366:
3365:Find sources:
3360:
3357:
3356:
3355:
3350:
3343:
3342:
3337:
3333:
3332:verifiability
3329:
3325:
3321:
3317:
3312:
3304:
3302:
3300:
3296:
3292:
3288:
3284:
3279:
3274:
3270:
3268:
3267:
3263:
3258:. Thank you.
3257:
3251:
3247:
3243:
3239:
3234:
3230:
3225:
3221:
3217:
3213:
3205:
3201:
3199:
3198:
3194:
3190:
3187:
3180:
3178:
3177:
3173:
3169:
3165:
3161:
3156:
3152:
3151:
3150:the talk page
3146:
3145:
3135:
3126:
3124:
3120:
3116:
3112:
3108:
3100:
3094:
3088:
3087:
3083:
3079:
3071:
3069:
3068:
3064:
3060:
3052:
3050:
3049:
3045:
3041:
3037:
3034:
3030:
3026:
3022:
3018:
3010:
2998:
2994:
2990:
2986:
2982:
2978:
2974:
2970:
2967:
2964:
2960:
2959:
2958:
2954:
2950:
2945:
2944:
2943:
2939:
2935:
2930:
2925:
2924:
2923:
2922:
2921:
2920:
2919:
2914:
2912:
2907:
2905:
2904:
2900:
2896:
2892:
2887:
2885:
2881:
2877:
2873:
2865:
2863:
2862:
2859:
2854:
2849:
2839:
2838:lit criticism
2829:
2816:
2810:
2808:
2807:
2803:
2799:
2798:69.113.203.57
2795:
2792:
2789:
2788:
2785:
2778:
2776:
2774:
2770:
2766:
2762:
2758:
2747:
2745:
2744:
2741:
2738:
2735:
2732:
2729:
2721:
2719:
2718:
2714:
2710:
2706:
2698:
2696:
2695:
2692:
2686:
2681:
2679:
2673:
2665:
2663:
2662:
2659:
2655:
2646:
2644:
2643:
2640:
2631:
2629:
2628:
2625:
2621:
2617:
2613:
2609:
2604:
2598:
2596:
2589:
2586:
2580:
2575:
2574:
2573:
2572:
2571:
2568:
2565:
2562:
2558:
2555:
2551:
2548:
2542:
2540:
2539:
2535:
2531:
2523:
2519:
2516:
2512:
2511:
2510:
2509:
2506:
2498:
2494:
2492:
2491:
2488:
2484:
2476:
2473:
2467:
2464:
2460:
2456:
2455:
2454:
2451:
2446:
2445:
2444:
2443:
2440:
2435:
2433:
2429:
2424:
2418:
2414:
2411:
2406:
2405:
2404:
2403:
2400:
2391:
2389:
2388:
2385:
2381:
2377:
2373:
2372:verifiability
2369:
2365:
2361:
2356:
2348:
2346:
2343:
2338:
2333:
2332:
2329:
2323:
2319:
2317:
2313:
2306:
2303:
2301:
2300:
2297:
2293:
2290:
2286:
2283:
2279:
2275:
2267:
2265:
2262:
2261:
2258:
2250:
2248:
2247:
2243:
2239:
2235:
2234:
2233:up for review
2229:
2225:
2221:
2217:
2210:
2207:
2200:
2197:
2196:Felsommerfeld
2193:
2189:
2187:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2177:
2171:
2167:
2166:
2163:
2159:
2155:
2149:
2148:
2145:
2139:
2138:
2135:
2129:
2128:
2125:
2116:
2113:
2112:Felsommerfeld
2108:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2102:
2096:
2095:
2092:
2084:
2081:
2080:Felsommerfeld
2077:
2069:
2066:
2061:
2055:
2052:
2047:
2046:
2045:
2044:
2043:
2042:
2041:
2040:
2038:
2035:
2034:Felsommerfeld
2031:
2030:
2029:
2028:
2027:
2021:
2020:Felsommerfeld
2016:
2015:
2014:
2012:
2009:
2008:Felsommerfeld
2005:
2002:
1994:
1992:
1991:
1988:
1986:
1979:
1978:
1968:
1964:
1962:
1958:
1956:
1954:#wikimedia-pa
1953:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1946:
1941:
1940:Hello there!
1935:
1933:
1932:
1929:
1924:
1920:
1912:
1909:
1905:
1899:
1895:
1889:
1886:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1874:
1870:
1864:
1857:
1855:
1854:
1851:
1843:
1841:
1833:. Thank you.
1832:
1828:
1823:
1816:
1814:
1806:
1802:
1799:
1791:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1782:
1778:
1774:
1773:
1764:
1758:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1746:
1743:
1740:
1735:
1730:
1724:
1722:
1721:
1718:
1717:Melanochromis
1714:
1710:
1706:
1699:
1696:
1694:
1693:
1690:
1686:
1678:
1676:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1664:217.111.44.74
1661:
1651:
1639:
1636:
1632:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1623:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1592:Chris Wheeler
1589:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1583:
1580:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1570:
1562:
1560:
1549:
1543:
1537:
1532:
1527:
1522:
1517:
1512:
1499:
1494:
1489:
1483:
1478:
1473:
1468:
1463:
1458:
1451:
1450:
1443:
1439:
1436:
1432:
1429:Responded at
1428:
1427:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1413:84.145.229.73
1410:
1402:
1401:
1393:
1389:
1386:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1376:
1369:
1366:
1364:
1361:
1360:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1327:
1325:
1324:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1301:
1300:Portal:Poetry
1298:
1296:
1295:
1292:
1288:
1280:
1277:
1275:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1254:
1250:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1210:
1200:
1198:
1192:
1191:
1188:
1187:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1138:
1132:
1131:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1114:
1111:
1110:
1105:
1102:
1098:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1073:
1072:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1050:
1047:
1039:
1035:
1030:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1016:
1011:
1010:
1005:
1004:
998:
997:
994:
992:
986:
982:
981:
977:
976:
971:
966:
965:
962:
961:
955:
951:
948:
943:
942:
941:
940:
937:
930:
929:Portal:Poetry
927:
921:
918:
915:
911:
907:
903:
899:
898:
897:
894:
890:
889:
884:
883:
882:
881:
878:
875:
868:
865:
857:
854:
849:
848:
847:
841:
834:
833:
828:
824:
820:
819:ternary logic
816:
811:
810:
809:
806:
801:
797:
796:Ternary logic
792:
791:
790:
789:
783:
776:
775:
769:
761:
757:
754:
750:
749:
748:
747:
744:
740:
736:
729:
728:Cell membrane
725:
721:
718:
714:
713:
712:
711:
708:
700:
696:
692:
688:
684:
677:
676:
675:
674:
670:
666:
659:
650:
644:
641:
637:
636:
635:
631:
627:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
612:
605:
598:
590:
587:
582:
578:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
563:
560:
555:
552:
547:
546:
545:
544:
541:
538:
534:
533:
530:
527:
522:
521:
520:
519:
516:
515:Pascal.Tesson
512:
509:
505:
502:
499:
495:
487:
485:
483:
480:
476:
473:
469:
467:
464:
460:
454:
451:
446:
445:
444:
442:
439:
435:
431:
428:
425:
419:
417:
416:
413:
408:
404:
397:
394:
391:, I think...
390:
385:
381:
379:
376:
371:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
354:
351:
347:
343:
342:
341:
340:
337:
334:
329:
328:
327:
326:
323:
316:
313:
309:
302:
301:
300:
299:
296:
292:
283:
281:
280:
277:
270:AntiVandalBot
269:
265:
262:
258:
257:
256:
255:
252:
248:
244:
237:
233:
229:
226:
222:
217:
216:
215:
214:
211:
207:
199:
193:
190:
186:
182:
178:
177:
176:
175:
169:
165:
161:
160:
159:
156:
151:
146:
145:
144:
143:
140:
136:
131:
129:
125:
118:
115:
113:
111:
107:
103:
99:
92:
89:
87:
82:
81:RayBeckerman
80:
76:
72:
67:
66:
59:
56:
54:
51:
49:
46:
45:
41:
34:
30:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
4671:
4664:
4654:, and add a
4635:
4630:
4627:
4619:OTRS pending
4607:
4600:
4586:
4579:
4577:
4537:
4530:
4520:, and add a
4501:
4496:
4493:
4485:OTRS pending
4473:
4466:
4452:
4445:
4443:
4403:
4396:
4386:, and add a
4367:
4362:
4359:
4351:OTRS pending
4339:
4332:
4318:
4311:
4309:
4288:
4269:
4250:
4242:
4236:
4173:
4157:
4139:
4132:
4122:, and add a
4103:
4098:
4095:
4087:OTRS pending
4075:
4068:
4054:
4047:
4045:
4024:
4006:
3999:
3989:, and add a
3970:
3965:
3962:
3954:OTRS pending
3942:
3935:
3921:
3914:
3912:
3889:Magioladitis
3874:
3835:
3828:
3818:, and add a
3799:
3794:
3791:
3783:OTRS pending
3771:
3764:
3750:
3743:
3741:
3718:
3699:
3683:
3664:Following a
3658:
3650:
3622:
3604:Following a
3598:
3572:
3554:Following a
3548:
3522:
3508:
3497:
3486:
3474:
3466:User:Akoha77
3463:
3444:
3425:
3413:
3407:
3399:
3392:
3386:
3380:
3374:
3364:
3339:
3319:
3308:
3280:
3277:
3260:
3208:
3184:
3154:
3148:
3141:
3127:
3104:
3075:
3056:
3014:
2917:
2908:
2888:
2869:
2855:
2822:
2796:
2793:
2790:
2782:
2751:
2725:
2702:
2677:
2669:
2650:
2635:
2615:
2611:
2607:
2605:
2602:
2594:
2578:
2569:
2566:
2563:
2559:
2556:
2552:
2549:
2546:
2527:
2501:
2480:
2436:
2425:
2422:
2395:
2376:welcome page
2352:
2334:
2309:
2294:
2291:
2287:
2271:
2263:
2254:
2231:
2213:
2172:
2168:
2150:
2140:
2130:
2120:
2097:
2088:
2026:2007 (UTC))
2025:
2001:User:Smatprt
1998:
1980:
1973:
1971:
1961:mailing list
1942:
1939:
1918:
1915:
1861:
1817:
1810:
1797:
1770:
1768:
1750:User:Ka5hmir
1741:
1702:
1682:
1655:
1609:Howard Eskin
1596:Howard Eskin
1566:
1558:
1407:— Preceding
1403:
1398:
1397:
1372:
1362:
1341:Royalguard11
1331:
1307:
1305:
1287:Radio Blagon
1283:
1279:Radio Blagon
1258:
1214:
1193:
1170:HighwayCello
1124:HighwayCello
1119:
1107:
1100:
1089:
1078:
1069:
1068:The list of
1019:
1007:
991:HighwayCello
988:
979:
978:
933:
886:
871:
831:
814:
799:
773:
765:
733:
703:
697:Taunting on
654:
607:
603:
602:
576:
500:
491:
477:
474:
470:
461:
457:
436:
432:
429:
426:
423:
400:
319:
304:
287:
273:
241:
205:
203:
132:
123:
121:
93:
90:
83:
68:
64:
63:
32:
26:
3531:83.49.44.18
3525:—Preceding
3470:User:Phauly
3441:Checking in
3390:free images
3142:the top of
3107:Sean O'Hare
3093:Sean O'Hare
2949:Jasper Deng
2934:Jasper Deng
2882:, click on
2755:—Preceding
2674:. Best! --
2550:Dear Adam,
2274:Silent Hill
1312:Portal:Dogs
1079:new program
1000:What's New?
823:fuzzy logic
586:Doc Tropics
537:Doc Tropics
526:Doc Tropics
420:PORNOGRAPHY
412:Doc Tropics
375:Doc Tropics
350:Doc Tropics
346:snowballing
333:Doc Tropics
295:Doc Tropics
291:this editor
276:Doc Tropics
236:The Beatles
210:Doc Tropics
96:—Preceding
4704:Categories
4194:topic bans
3651:See also:
3189:Tcaudilllg
3040:LegalEagle
2656:. Thanks,
2322:deprecated
2296:Xuchilbara
2110:blocked. (
1976:Cbrown1023
1505:tonight!!!
1354:Review Me!
1166:Shreshth91
1116:Shreshth91
424:Dear Sir-
312:incivility
4656:rationale
4597:this list
4522:rationale
4463:this list
4388:rationale
4329:this list
4278:has been
4190:site bans
4124:rationale
4065:this list
3991:rationale
3932:this list
3820:rationale
3761:this list
3509:Thanks!
3426:Thanks!--
3283:non-canon
3273:Non-canon
3017:few lines
2963:topic ban
2911:WINDOWS 7
2884:this link
2880:this list
2858:Adoniscik
2828:criticism
2815:criticism
2748:Interview
2678:Jreferee
2584:Montanabw
2477:FA review
2410:Gscshoyru
2392:Knowledge
2384:Gscshoyru
2368:Knowledge
2328:MZMcBride
2251:Orzinuovi
2154:Astrology
1959:Join our
1911:Astrology
1894:Nishkid64
1869:Nishkid64
1822:this link
1577:Done : )
1306:As I see
1134:Signed...
904:is up at
888:Fisheries
705:Thanks.--
524:right? --
484:Xchanter
468:Xchanter
443:Xchanter
384:The Onion
58:Archive 3
53:Archive 2
48:Archive 1
4593:CC-BY-SA
4459:CC-BY-SA
4325:CC-BY-SA
4061:CC-BY-SA
3928:CC-BY-SA
3757:CC-BY-SA
3527:unsigned
2993:contribs
2932:promise.
2769:contribs
2757:unsigned
2579:tapadero
2547:RE: MDC
2543:Stirrups
2515:Ronnotel
2505:Ronnotel
2463:Walkerma
2439:Walkerma
2242:watch me
1777:fair use
1660:unsigned
1444:New Year
1421:contribs
1409:unsigned
1246:ccwaters
1225:ccwaters
1162:The Halo
1058:full log
1034:MiszaBot
902:criteria
840:contribs
800:a single
782:contribs
658:WP:LEGAL
504:contribs
494:Xchanter
488:Xchanter
479:Xchanter
463:Xchanter
438:Xchanter
284:Trolling
117:Jim Webb
98:unsigned
4256:HAMPION
3721:MBisanz
3704:to the
3511:Akoha77
3447:Smatprt
3428:DASHBot
3396:WP refs
3384:scholar
3291:LonerXL
3229:protect
3224:history
3053:SCarian
3029:WP:SOAP
3025:WP:NPOV
2918:Hello,
2709:doncram
2639:Smatprt
2610:" and "
2483:Imagism
2481:Hi ...
2475:Imagism
2238:Bigwyrm
2192:Smatprt
2176:Smatprt
2162:Smatprt
2158:WP:NPOV
2144:Smatprt
2134:Smatprt
2124:Smatprt
2101:Smatprt
2091:Smatprt
2065:Smatprt
2051:Smatprt
1927:Tropics
1754:Ka5hmir
1679:Sonnets
1435:SWAdair
1238:WP:TMIN
1158:FireFox
1142:Natalya
1038:Misza13
945:again,
682:HAIRBOY
664:HAIRBOY
625:HAIRBOY
315:manner.
206:Support
200:Aw Geez
128:WP:NPOV
4180:. The
3715:WP:RFA
3368:Google
3326:. The
3233:delete
3164:userfy
3155:speedy
3134:hangon
3031:&
2929:Warren
2761:Goat77
2731:Eagles
2530:Jogers
2487:Stumps
2423:Adam,
2360:citing
1788:Go to
1631:WP:ANI
1320:feydey
1261:newkai
1221:WP:FUC
1081:: the
936:feydey
914:Banyan
906:T:ITNT
874:Banyan
832:Simões
774:Simões
743:VoABot
407:WP:NLT
403:WP:NLT
389:arbcom
251:VoABot
221:people
4158:Kelly
4025:Kelly
3852:Bkell
3636:) at
3586:) at
3411:JSTOR
3372:books
3287:canon
3250:views
3242:watch
3238:links
3168:Kevin
2779:Help!
2740:Tampa
2337:Agwin
1154:EWS23
1146:Banes
867:T:ITN
768:logic
762:Logic
739:WP:PP
707:MONGO
508:Penis
247:WP:PP
164:WP:RS
4692:talk
4612:here
4603:; or
4558:talk
4478:here
4469:; or
4424:talk
4344:here
4335:; or
4214:talk
4080:here
4071:; or
3947:here
3938:; or
3893:talk
3856:talk
3776:here
3767:; or
3684:xeno
3634:talk
3630:Xeno
3584:talk
3580:Xeno
3535:talk
3515:talk
3491:and
3479:and
3451:talk
3432:talk
3404:FENS
3378:news
3295:talk
3246:logs
3220:talk
3216:edit
3193:talk
3172:talk
3082:talk
3063:talk
3044:talk
3033:WP:V
2989:talk
2985:Josh
2983:. -
2981:this
2953:talk
2938:talk
2913:PAGE
2899:talk
2802:talk
2765:talk
2728:here
2713:talk
2658:Wrad
2654:here
2599:Bong
2570:MDC
2534:talk
2428:here
2316:here
2278:here
1984:talk
1923:Doc
1898:talk
1887:and
1873:talk
1862:See
1839:Love
1836:Lara
1713:vote
1689:Chuq
1668:talk
1417:talk
1350:Desk
1346:Talk
1291:Ajor
1168:and
1006:The
917:Tree
877:Tree
825:and
599:Note
577:real
498:talk
189:Talk
139:Talk
106:talk
75:talk
4633:.
4499:.
4365:.
4292:•
4174:Hi,
4101:.
3968:.
3868:of
3797:.
3418:TWL
3341:689
3316:bot
3140:to
3125:.
2975:or
2833:to
2734:Fan
2194:? (
2006:] (
1858:ITN
1803:On
1515:Why
1461:Why
1433:.
1302:DYK
815:did
606:not
187:|
137:|
71:Ray
4706::
4694:)
4670:.
4648:}}
4642:{{
4622:}}
4616:{{
4599:)
4560:)
4536:.
4514:}}
4508:{{
4488:}}
4482:{{
4465:)
4426:)
4402:.
4380:}}
4374:{{
4354:}}
4348:{{
4331:)
4286:.
4216:)
4192:,
4138:.
4116:}}
4110:{{
4090:}}
4084:{{
4067:)
4005:.
3983:}}
3977:{{
3957:}}
3951:{{
3934:)
3895:)
3887:.
3858:)
3834:.
3812:}}
3806:{{
3786:}}
3780:{{
3763:)
3537:)
3517:)
3453:)
3434:)
3398:)
3361:-
3352:}}
3346:{{
3301:)
3297:)
3248:|
3244:|
3240:|
3236:|
3231:|
3227:|
3222:|
3218:|
3195:)
3174:)
3137:}}
3131:{{
3084:)
3076:HI
3072:HI
3065:)
3046:)
3027:,
2995:)
2991:|
2955:)
2940:)
2901:)
2851:}}
2845:{{
2841:}}
2835:{{
2831:}}
2825:{{
2818:}}
2812:{{
2804:)
2771:)
2767:•
2737:In
2715:)
2536:)
2362:a
2324:}}
2320:{{
2226:,
2222:,
2039:)
2013:)
1890:.
1796:,
1670:)
1423:)
1419:•
1164:,
1160:,
1156:,
1152:,
1148:,
1144:,
1106:A
1026:.
987:.
844:)
786:)
689:)
671:)
632:)
581:WP
108:)
88:"
77:)
4690:(
4688:B
4556:(
4554:B
4422:(
4420:B
4253:C
4212:(
3891:(
3854:(
3640:.
3632:(
3590:.
3582:(
3533:(
3513:(
3493:2
3489:1
3449:(
3430:(
3414:·
3408:·
3400:·
3393:·
3387:·
3381:·
3375:·
3370:(
3320:0
3293:(
3252:)
3214:(
3191:(
3170:(
3080:(
3061:(
3042:(
2987:(
2951:(
2936:(
2897:(
2800:(
2763:(
2711:(
2690:c
2687:/
2684:t
2532:(
2201:)
2117:)
2085:)
2018:(
1900:)
1896:(
1875:)
1871:(
1848:C
1844:/
1800:.
1674:.
1666:(
1535:1
1530:9
1525:9
1520:1
1510:¿
1481:1
1476:9
1471:9
1466:1
1456:¿
1415:(
1356:)
1352:·
1348:·
1344:(
1269:c
1267:-
1265:t
1199:.
1126:.
1060:)
1056:(
837:/
835:(
779:/
777:(
730::
687:☎
685:(
680:C
669:☎
667:(
662:C
630:☎
628:(
623:C
501:·
496:(
238::
104:(
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.