Knowledge

User talk:Akshaytherock

Source đź“ť

323: 137: 23: 378:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
232:
in 2012 (that also relied on the directive) regarding Knowledge: "The court held that when a company edits a Knowledge article, the resulting text falsely creates the impression that the edit has no business-related purpose. By implication, the judges found that the average reader of Knowledge
256:
template at the top of the talk page of affected articles and filling in the parameters. They should also supply this information as part of a list on their user page of all their paid contributions.
431:. If you do not wish to edit collaboratively, you don't have to edit here, that's your choice. But any further disruption in the form of edit warring or pointy behavior is going to get you blocked. — 156:. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Knowledge when you have a conflict of interest, see the 229: 273:
You get this message since I noticed both that all you do on Knowledge is edit articles related to Sargun Mehta, and that you repeatedly add excessive, and promotional, details to
427:
It is clear that you are not here to edit collaboratively. Rather, you are here to promote a certain topic and when it doesn't go your way you indulge in pointy behavior such as
91:! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Knowledge and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! 141: 303:
a GA reviewer removing content, that is exist in GA/FA's article, so i asked to reviewer in article's talkpage so please do not revert without discuss about it.
76: 75: 337:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's 245:”. This expectation by consumers of neutral information on Knowledge, requires that companies not write "their" WP articles for PR/marketing purposes. 39: 346: 251: 225: 243:
that consumers are likely to believe reflects the opinions, beliefs, findings, or experience of a party other than the sponsoring advertiser
42:, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 145: 217:
of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
260: 338: 153: 354: 358: 163: 173:
articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
366: 35: 98: 438: 268: 264: 371: 350: 349:
for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
334: 30:. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) personon 183: 54: 43: 221: 144:
your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things
342: 259:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to
452: 432: 409: 389: 304: 284: 105: 88: 462: 248:
Editors who are compensated for their contributions should make the disclosure by placing the
116: 49: 27: 209: 238: 375: 195: 403: 384: 298: 279: 213: 158: 458: 330: 274: 149: 112: 31: 457:
Maybe autoconfirmed privileges should be withdrawn until the editwarring stops? —
383:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 345:
among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
194:
to the Knowledge article or website of your organization in other articles (see
322: 466: 444: 417: 395: 312: 290: 120: 61: 136: 22: 233:
articles expects to find objective and neutral information." That is a
93: 222:
must not contribute content that violates conflict of interest laws
374:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 111:
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend,
321: 38:, so I removed it. Knowledge has a strict policy concerning 224:(just as all contributors must respect copyright). The 204:
so that you do not violate Knowledge's content policies.
87:! Thanks for contributing to Knowledge. Be our guest at 428: 365:
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
357:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 341:to work toward making a version that represents 180:on the talk pages of affected articles (see the 381:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule 67:Akshaytherock, you are invited to the Teahouse! 408:i don't want to start editwar so please wait. 277:, as if to promote the subject of the article. 228:is valid throughout the European Union. In a 34:, but you didn’t support your changes with a 8: 164:frequently asked questions for organizations 333:shows that you are currently engaged in an 208:In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's 226:Unfair Commercial Practices Directive 220:Last but not least: All contributors 7: 14: 135: 74: 40:how we write about living people 21: 370:—especially if you violate the 329:Your recent editing history at 131:Managing a conflict of interest 159:conflict of interest guideline 1: 235:very very important condition 36:citation to a reliable source 467:04:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC) 445:17:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC) 418:16:56, 20 October 2015 (UTC) 396:16:49, 20 October 2015 (UTC) 313:16:55, 20 October 2015 (UTC) 291:16:49, 20 October 2015 (UTC) 252:connected contributor (paid) 121:16:12, 3 February 2015 (UTC) 103: 62:07:14, 3 February 2015 (UTC) 483: 72: 171:avoid editing or creating 166:. In particular, please: 140:Hello, Akshaytherock. We 413: 308: 326: 202:exercise great caution 146:you have written about 325: 261:neutral point of view 230:German court decision 367:blocked from editing 237:, comparable to the 154:conflict of interest 99:I'm a Teahouse host 355:dispute resolution 327: 214:require disclosure 106:Visit the Teahouse 372:three-revert rule 152:, you may have a 128: 127: 123: 474: 456: 441: 435: 407: 302: 255: 187: 139: 110: 108: 96: 78: 71: 70: 60: 57: 52: 25: 482: 481: 477: 476: 475: 473: 472: 471: 450: 439: 433: 425: 401: 359:page protection 320: 296: 269:autobiographies 249: 181: 178:propose changes 148:in the article 133: 124: 109: 104: 92: 69: 55: 50: 47: 19: 12: 11: 5: 480: 478: 470: 469: 424: 421: 400: 319: 316: 295: 206: 205: 199: 189: 174: 132: 129: 126: 125: 81: 79: 68: 65: 46:. Thank you. 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 479: 468: 464: 460: 454: 453:SpacemanSpiff 449: 448: 447: 446: 443: 442: 436: 430: 423:Final warning 422: 420: 419: 415: 411: 410:Akshaytherock 405: 398: 397: 394: 393: 392: 388: 387: 382: 377: 373: 369: 368: 362: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 324: 317: 315: 314: 310: 306: 305:Akshaytherock 300: 293: 292: 289: 288: 287: 283: 282: 278: 276: 270: 266: 262: 257: 253: 246: 244: 240: 236: 231: 227: 223: 218: 216: 215: 211: 203: 200: 197: 193: 192:avoid linking 190: 185: 179: 175: 172: 169: 168: 167: 165: 161: 160: 155: 151: 147: 143: 138: 130: 122: 118: 114: 107: 102: 100: 95: 90: 86: 85:Akshaytherock 80: 77: 73: 66: 64: 63: 59: 58: 53: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 24: 17:February 2015 16: 437: 426: 399: 391: 390: 385: 380: 364: 363: 331:Sargun Mehta 328: 318:October 2015 294: 286: 285: 280: 275:Sargun Mehta 272: 258: 247: 242: 234: 219: 212: 210:terms of use 207: 201: 191: 184:request edit 177: 170: 157: 150:Sargun Mehta 134: 94:Technical 13 89:the Teahouse 84: 82: 48: 44:my talk page 32:Sargun Mehta 20: 351:noticeboard 28:Babitaarora 26:Hello, I'm 188:template); 343:consensus 339:talk page 239:FTC Guide 176:instead, 434:Spaceman 404:Thomas.W 386:Thomas.W 379:warring— 353:or seek 335:edit war 299:Thomas.W 281:Thomas.W 265:sourcing 459:Brianhe 376:reverts 196:WP:SPAM 142:welcome 113:HostBot 267:, and 51:Babita 440:Spiff 56:arora 463:talk 429:this 414:talk 309:talk 162:and 117:talk 361:. 347:BRD 271:. 83:Hi 465:) 416:) 311:) 263:, 254:}} 250:{{ 241:" 198:); 186:}} 182:{{ 119:) 101:) 461:( 455:: 451:@ 412:( 406:: 402:@ 307:( 301:: 297:@ 115:( 97:(

Index

Information icon
Babitaarora
Sargun Mehta
citation to a reliable source
how we write about living people
my talk page
Babita
arora
07:14, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
the Teahouse
Technical 13
I'm a Teahouse host
Visit the Teahouse
HostBot
talk
16:12, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Information icon
welcome
you have written about
Sargun Mehta
conflict of interest
conflict of interest guideline
frequently asked questions for organizations
request edit
WP:SPAM
terms of use
require disclosure
must not contribute content that violates conflict of interest laws
Unfair Commercial Practices Directive

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑