User talk:AlexD - Knowledge (XXG)

201:, however, geographer articles were gradually categorized by nationality or merely given stubs label. Therefore, it is hard to track down all the geographer listings in wiki. The list of geographers is not working efficent enough as it failed to leave a mark in the category section. I am less familiar with the operation in categorification, but I think there is a method to get a comprehensive list of geographers (those now listed in different geographers-related categories) without input each of them manuely. If not, maybe we twos and other concerned indiviuals can figure out a way to solve the current problem. 1922: 1275: 1143: 2719: 2667: 2613: 331: 1224: 2344: 2088: 2410: 2291: 1549:. After reading that, then I expanded my definition of what physiography is (or was). I still have problems with it, I still tend to think of as more landform related, but if other sources ay different, then I guess I need to change. So, if you have more knowledge of the field or whatever (mine is really limited), then perhaps you could add some further clarification on the 278:. I did some sorting, placing the cat Human communities under Human geography. Human communities splitting into Urban geography and Rural geography. And those splitting into appropriate sized communities - cities, districts, neighbourhoods, villages, settlements, etc. Hmains has reverted much of my work, and insists on settlements being the term we should use - basing it on 282:, which was a declined proposal to rename Settlements by region to Populated places by region. What do you think? Is settlement an acceptable term for covering human communities ranging from well established cities down to refuge camps. Is Human community a viable alternative? Are there other choices (apart from populated places of course!)? I have started a discussion 2736:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2684:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2632:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2149: 455: 1528:

that use a variation of physiography in the text. If users see that on the template, then it may ring a bell. Wikilinking may work in most case just within the article, but the user would need to click the link or at least move their mouse over it before seeing the connection. Ideas or comments? Thanks.

1553:

article so we can all see the difference and use the same (and hopefully correct) terms? I'm mainly just a computer (database) guy, and the geologists I work with use the term all the time, but quite often in different ways, so I'm a bit vague on the exact definition. What's on the physical geography

1104:

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work.

264:

I've been attempting to overview and tidy up the geography cats which involve the places where people live. From the top level down to local neighbourhoods. There has been some overlapping and various mis-routings. It's been interesting looking at it all. However, there appear to be two useful ways

181:

I hope you do not think I was implying you thought he was admirable. I'm sure you have a NPOV on such inclusions. I just took the opportunity to whinge about another example of Australia's hidden history. The bogey man reference is to aboriginal mothers who scared their children with 'Frank Jardine

1527:

Hi. Since you created it and have put so much work into it, would you have any objections to the template displaying "Sub-fields of Physical Geography (Physiography)" as the title? Even though they're the same thing, many people wouldn't know that, and I've been running across quite a few articles

424:

The purpose is incorrect. It should be something along the lines of: "The image is the front cover of the magazine, which is the main subject of the article." Also, given the size of that image and the original size of the actual cover, yes, the resolution has been reduced. Since the image is of a

315:

Hi, I've been doing some tidying up (ongoing) on this category. I see from edit histories that you added a lot of people to this category: great work. But ... when you put the cat tag at the end of the article, could you add their names as well, please? If you don't, they get alphabetised oddly:

373:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 316:

Martha Black was under M, Christina Lamb was under C etc. You can look at any of the entries to see the correct manner of doing it (I can't cut and paste an example here else it just ends up at the bottom of your talk page as a category!) Many thanks

151:

Could the 6* rating possibly be a research score that isn't the RAE? If you could find some other sources or links that refer to either Bristol or Durham's geography departments as 6* that might be useful in figuring out what is going on here.

1540:

Hi Alex. I was intially (for about 6 or 7 years) under the same impression about physiography, but another user pointed me to a couple refs (and the Wiki article) that say physiography is merely a contraction of the two words

2233: 137:

I can't find any references to a 5** or 6* rating on any webpage that is associated with the RAE. Apart from the Bristol and the Durham geography webpage. Bristol's pages seem to contradict each other, here is one

2571:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2516:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 226:

There are some geographers that I always want to start an article: Peter Haggett, Peter Gould, Richard Chorley, Ron Johnson, Richard Symanski,Richard Peet, Anthony Orme etc... Who do you have on your list?

1053: 2305: 369:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1870: