540:
it's the future standing of people in creative fields. But I know the academic world, not the creative arts, and feel a little lost--I suggested a week ago or so that if w could get some consensus about which exhibitions are notable it might help. If they're on university faculty I feel more confident because the faculty have judged them & it's possible to tell which are the good departments (my usual research university as standard doesn't always work here) --but this seems to be frequent only in the US. I also noticed a certain similarity in the format of many of the entries.
1387:
1279:
221:
21:
Hi Alf, I was curious about the 18% reflectance number myself, and as far as I can tell, it is because in a typical 5-stop range (such as is normally found in "typical" papers), 18% is the middle. In other words, if you defined these five stops as Zones 1-5, then Zone 5 would be 100%, Zone 4 would be
966:
The article has been edited to make it conform, so I really don't know what the problem is? I also have some newspaper cuttings from the achieves, so I know the sources are correct. I have done serious research on this. And I think it's hell of an achievement to do a First Day cover at 14 (not 15 as
539:
You have anticipated what I was hinting at--the standards for visual artists of all types seem unsatisfactory, and WP needs a better way of discriminating. I'm equally concerned about not having the important ones as inserting the unimportant--if there is anything which is hard to predict by anyone
508:
You've got me at a loss, here. If I don't know, then how can I guess? I mean, it's like me saying that you wrote what you wrote because you had "reasons". That's probably true, but not really helpful, since a whole bunch of different things could fall under the heading of reasons. Do you understand
729:
In the Books section he refers to "Approximately 15 book reviews: Times Higher
Education Supplement (2005); The Lancet (2005)" What I suggested is that he give the exact citations of the reviews, because a significant review can be used as a third party source if the content is substantial &
861:
BTW, Alf, sorry if I came on too strong. I was adding your first remark here to my misunderstanding of your reply to jpierreg on the other page and coming up with an opinion of you as biased against
Scientologists that might well not be true, and that I would not have made had I not misunderstood
784:
I appreciate your participation in the debate over term usage. I see you are a visual artist, who's opinion I have more respect for than a casual observer in the debate. The term "image development" is a real term, regardless of how well the article represents the term. I'd like to know what you
641:
I am less concerned with the inevitability of outcomes than with the complete lack of consensus in either direction, which is supposed to be the operating principle behind our discussions. In the haste of this particular situation, it has immediately precipitated things into a binary keep/delete
209:
article is concerned, my conclusion is that its non-notable as far as
Knowledge (XXG) is concerned - it reads like poorly written promotional material with desperate scraping of anything of note to be included. Unencyclopaedic generally. From your comment on my talk page, it sounds like you're
280:
I've been working on improving this article and finding better sources. I saw that your delete was "weak". He has received an award for his work and seems to have a pretty strong body of work; looking beyond the sheer magnitude of the G-hits, the content of the hits seems strong and he seems
895:
as in "your vote doesn't really count because you are an ex-Scientologist". A similar argument is often levied wrongfully against me as an active
Scientologist in good standing with my Church. I see now that you meant Ms. Schwarz. I don't see it as assuming bad faith so much as a simple
204:
Hi Alf, I saw your discussion (above) with Rough the other day it didn't click with me that that you were the Alf mentioned in the article. I'm unsure how much you know but there seems to be a complex of related articles and associated users - its quite intriguing. As far as the
440:
Please take another look. Article is almost completely verifiable now. It will take a little time to find the original publications of articles, etc. but this guys writing was easily available on the magazine rack of mainstream bookstores, in Mezlim, Gnosis, Green Egg, etc.
716:
At the moment I can only come up with 2 online sources. However, other sources a program to a concert and a newspaper clipping I must find and scan (what should I do with the scan documents there after?). I will put the online sources on the "dispute deletion"
32:
I think we're saying the same thing - in a five-stop range, the middle stop should be at 18% reflectance. That's where the number comes from - it's the geometric mean of a 5 stop doubling progression. Logically 82% absorbtion is the same as 18% reflectance.
1119:
1000:
578:(please do list appropriate AfDs there). I think it should go under the article details and above the nom statement, as it is a formal notice and not part of the debate. It will sign your name with date stamp automatically. Please pass on to others.
498:
I understand the meaning of the word, but I was more interested in which "principles" you were assuming to have motivated my decision to list the article on AFD. Not trying to be confrontational; I just don't understand what you're getting at, here.
1003:. Does this fix the attribution problem, at least for the interim? I whole-heartedly agree that it needs rewriting. Meanwhile, I have added the three electronic references to the article, although the last one is not very reliable. --
674:
I sure got some people pissed though... I don't see the fuzz about either of the big AfDs anyway. Sometimes I have the feeling that
Knowledge (XXG) is a ersatz-religion for some editors where all heretics must be burned on a stake
22:
50%, Zone 3 would be 25%, and Zone 2.5 would be 18%. I think this is mentioned in some of the literature (I seem to remember seeing it in an Adams book), but I don't have hard references at hand today. Does this sound correct?
1243:
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
403:
Hi. The AfD for this person has been re-listed. As you had reqested references during the AfD, this is just to let you know that many references have been added since and perhaps you'd like to have a re-look. Thanks.
114:. Knowledge (XXG) gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Knowledge (XXG), the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an
67:. Knowledge (XXG) gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Knowledge (XXG), the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an
122:
indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
75:
indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
730:
not a listing. They arent ideal 3rd party sourced, but they are independent of him & published in a RS. He should have others, and he should add them. should I add anything on the Afd to clarify this?
891:(EC) To explain a bit more; you said "I sees something like former member of .... " and I think that jpierreg may well meet that description so I misunderstood the remark as being directed to him as an
708:
I understand. So would would program notes, newspaper article about an upcoming concert, and reliable internet references work as 2nd party references? What if they are only in print form...not online?
473:
321:
Added a bit more GM of two other radio stations then co-owner of another, then owner of another. Then when he sold the final he became president of
Pyramid Broadcasting, a collection of 12 stations. --
1147:
234:
and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
163:
Then we happen to stay in the same hotel today. Make you a deal, if you buy me a drink I'll ask my wife to bring you the book you need for the
Jacobson bio, she is flying in later this afternoon
1168:
456:
642:
discussion, with no thought given to possible alternative approaches or how to reach any kind of agreement. That makes it impossible for ideas like Zocky's to even get a fair hearing. --
281:
notable as being discussed quite a bit. Sometimes you just know that the subject is notable to the spirit of WP, but it's hard to beat the micro application of the standards.
613:
575:
375:
956:. Buy a copy. Buy some of the Ghost Stations Books. You will soon see his Artwork throughout. His Work is there on the Internet, but his name is not, if you see what I mean.
255:
1180:
1027:. His role as the right hand man and spokesman of Schneerson for 40 years and his stewardship of the organisation for the past 13 years makes him notable, not only the
315:
785:
think it should mean. Aside from the legalities, should there be an article? Should there be just a disambiguation page? Should it be part of the visual arts article?
934:
Hello, I cleaned up this article a bit and added a couple references for nondisputed facts. Please review my changes and consider changing your AfD vote. Thanks --
1143:
for deletion again. Previous AfD was closed as "no consensus". In the meantime the sources for the article have not become any better and it is still unverifiable.
1262:
1082:
1118:
and/or that article's previous deletion debate, I thought you might be interested in participating in its new nomination for deletion which can be found
556:
Hi! Have you already started working on the list of notable art awards. If yes, please provide a link -- I'll try to add the notable Indian art awards.
1448:
1340:
752:
I suggest putting the notice above the nom statement, as it's easier for people to spot. It's a formal content, and not part of the debate as such.
911:
I'm afraid I didn't quite understand your message. You said you "know that these laws don't exist", but subsequently say that "they do" exist?
146:
99:
767:
1023:
topics. This man is very very notable. And hopefully I will get round to sorting out the article tomorrow. This nomination is absurd as
119:
72:
1115:
1024:
304:
What is it exactly that you wonder about me? I am referring to your statement "... sometimes I wonder about the deletion nominators".
1044:
1452:
1344:
135:
115:
88:
68:
928:
896:
misunderstanding. But if you think it was AGF vio then I apologize for doing something that could be interpreted as such, too. --
843:
Thanks! Looks like a vote "free for all" has broken out. Personally I like votes, not as binding but as a way to narrow debate.
1257:
1207:
1179:. Now Pakistanphobia has been nominated for deletion. I thought you might be interested in participating in the AfD debate at
1440:
1398:
1376:
1332:
1290:
1268:
145:. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at
98:. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at
1444:
1336:
952:
in the books, you will find them. Under Bruce
Barrymore Halpenny, you find a list of some of his books and you will find
130:
83:
912:
354:
264:
However, a new source has become available, as mentioned on the disscusion site, should you wish to reconsider. --
1058:
1427:
1214:
1172:
519:
510:
500:
490:
480:
47:
34:
23:
736:
00:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC) (and the ed. is a rather stubborn person & if truth be told, a rather vain guy.)
1253:
1319:
979:
463:. Please review and make any alteration / expansion you feel appropriate, as I know nothing of this event.
1394:
1380:
64:
1210:
1019:
Please reconsider your vote on that AfD: The article is in a dire state but so almost all the articles on
1456:
1348:
1038:
1286:
1272:
1237:
1224:
231:
322:
111:
1474:
1366:
1188:
804:
387:
227:
397:
265:
1123:
786:
1203:
561:
211:
1464:
1423:
1356:
1315:
1098:
935:
879:
878:
no problem. anyone who has been through an editorial conference develops a thick skin (smirk)
828:
676:
643:
291:
1031:
1020:
963:, Laugh isn't it. Artists are trying to get on here and one that isn't they want to remove!
897:
867:
460:
345:
1410:
1302:
1470:
1362:
1247:
1184:
960:
800:
695:
421:
414:
379:
326:
305:
274:
246:
242:
489:
The term is ambiguous, which is why I ask for clarification. Can you please explicate? -
1176:
1013:
1001:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Mohammad
Badshah Qadri-ul-Chishti Yamani Raichuri
341:
238:
142:
95:
1409:
While all constructive contributions to
Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be
1301:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be
986:
970:
753:
628:
617:
557:
425:
405:
361:
1154:
844:
1004:
464:
434:
1140:
1029:
165 newspaper articles, dozens of scholarly articles and books he is cited in.
917:
892:
771:
442:
261:
Thank you for your involvement in the discussion of this article's deletion.
184:
175:
799:
I replied to your replies in thread at Daniel Brandt's 13th AfD nomination.--
1478:
1370:
1218:
1192:
1157:
1126:
1103:
1091:
1071:
1007:
989:
973:
938:
922:
900:
884:
870:
847:
833:
822:
806:
789:
774:
756:
742:
698:
681:
666:
646:
631:
620:
564:
546:
522:
513:
503:
493:
483:
467:
445:
428:
408:
390:
364:
348:
330:
308:
294:
268:
214:
187:
178:
50:
37:
26:
1087:
818:
738:
732:
662:
542:
1463:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the
1355:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the
816:
You might want to take another look, because I found some non-blog refs.
206:
344:
article from scratch, and would appreciate your opinions. Thank you.
479:
What do you mean by "principles", in your statement on this AFD? -
474:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Al Gore III (6th nomination)
220:
1148:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Mark Hucko (2nd nomination)
340:
Further to your comment at the AFD debate, I have re-written the
985:
It has been kept as you wished. Now it needs a massive cleanup!
967:
I had incorrectly put). Please review your decision. Thank you.
862:
your reply to jpierreg. --Justanother 15:10, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
827:
good job, noticed that Brandt had something to say in his AfD?
660:. I think the honest people here need to encourage each other.
574:
Here's a template to use in an AfD, when it has been listed on
126:
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
79:
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
1169:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Anti-Pakistani sentiment
1114:
As someone who has contributed to the talk page discussion on
457:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Magdalena Trzebiatowska
1385:
1277:
219:
360:
I expanded the article. Perhaps it is worth keeping now. --
576:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Deletion sorting/Visual arts
376:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Joseph T. Bockrath
1451:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
1433:
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing
1343:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
1325:
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing
1064:
1050:
657:
1416:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
1308:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
374:
Could you please explain your comment that you put on
1183:. Feel free to come by and contribute your thoughts.
1181:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Pakistanphobia
316:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Arnie Ginsburg
210:suggesting similar. Am I reading you correctly? —
995:Mohammad Badshah Qadri-ul-Chishti Yamani Raichuri
1083:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Watergraph
1081:you might be interst in the AfD discussions on
249:}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
8:
780:Comments on image development (visual arts)
424:, which I think demonstrate notability. --
59:License tagging for Image:Fra1 col Alb.jpg
721:Sergei Lysenko 22:14, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
712:Sergei Lysenko 19:25, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
147:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions
100:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions
612:: This debate has been included in the
1422:notice, but please explain why in your
1314:notice, but please explain why in your
1246:If you have any questions, please see
948:If you go to Amazon.co.uk and type in
157:Yes, had to go out to see a red ship.
1032:
656:Glad to see your sensible comment;
614:list of Visual arts-related deletions
106:License tagging for Image:Gno neg.jpg
7:
1467:of each individual file for details.
1359:of each individual file for details.
1146:Your opinion will be appreciated at
518:OK, that makes more sense. Thanks! -
136:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags
89:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags
1411:deleted for any of several reasons
1401:because of the following concern:
1303:deleted for any of several reasons
1293:because of the following concern:
1202:Hi just letting you know that the
1167:I noticed you participated in the
1116:List of publications in philosophy
230:has smiled at you! Smiles promote
14:
1436:{{proposed deletion/dated files}}
1419:{{proposed deletion/dated files}}
1328:{{proposed deletion/dated files}}
1311:{{proposed deletion/dated files}}
1234:The media file you uploaded as:
929:Institute of Palliative Medicine
149:. 16:07, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
131:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy
102:. 01:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
84:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy
1405:unused, low-res, no obvious use
1297:unused, low-res, no obvious use
748:Listed at Visual arts deletions
141:This is an automated notice by
94:This is an automated notice by
1:
1219:12:52, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
1193:05:05, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
1025:this google news achive shows
853:Sorry for my misunderstanding
632:00:11, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
621:00:11, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
565:14:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
547:02:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
523:22:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
514:22:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
504:21:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
494:21:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
484:21:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
468:06:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
446:17:52, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
215:23:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
188:14:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
179:13:53, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
51:23:56, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
38:23:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
27:22:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
770:and reply there. Thanks. --
459:, I have created a stub for
429:02:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
409:20:14, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
391:04:28, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
365:21:59, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
349:18:28, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
331:22:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
309:22:30, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
300:AfD Mohammad Ishaq Al-Fayyad
237:Smile at others by adding {{
1455:allows discussion to reach
1347:allows discussion to reach
1227:missing description details
694:Thanks for the references.
420:I added some references to
295:01:03, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
269:19:19, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
1494:
1479:01:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
1447:exist. In particular, the
1339:exist. In particular, the
1208:up for deletion yet again.
1158:12:15, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
1127:17:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
1072:02:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
1008:04:45, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
999:Please read my comment at
990:03:47, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
974:11:23, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
939:19:38, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
923:00:18, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
901:16:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
885:15:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
871:15:53, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
857:As posted to the AfD talk:
848:15:04, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
834:00:21, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
823:00:15, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
355:George Randolph Hearst III
1441:proposed deletion process
1371:01:02, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
1333:proposed deletion process
1263:15:59, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
1104:17:19, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
1092:02:27, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
807:04:58, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
790:21:30, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
775:00:38, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
757:03:39, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
743:00:18, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
699:10:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
682:15:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
667:02:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
647:01:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
455:Based on your comment on
1175:was eventually moved to
1173:Anti-Pakistani sentiment
944:Baron Barrymore Halpenny
570:Visual arts-related AfDs
370:Your comments on an AFD
46:Feel free to go ahead!
1407:
1390:
1299:
1282:
1132:Mark Hucko AfD, take 2
1097:perfectlt right. tnx.
980:Justin Michael Jenkins
864:
224:
183:Be ther in 30 minutes
120:image description page
73:image description page
65:Image:Fra1 col Alb.jpg
1403:
1399:proposed for deletion
1395:File:Fra1 col Alb.jpg
1389:
1381:File:Fra1 col Alb.jpg
1295:
1291:proposed for deletion
1281:
1252:Message delivered by
1153:Thanks in advance. --
859:
552:Re: Indian Art Awards
223:
110:Thanks for uploading
63:Thanks for uploading
1453:files for discussion
1428:the file's talk page
1345:files for discussion
1320:the file's talk page
1085:and /Fuji_transfer
589:isual arts-related
520:Hit bull, win steak
511:Hit bull, win steak
509:why I'm confused? -
501:Hit bull, win steak
491:Hit bull, win steak
481:Hit bull, win steak
284:What do you think?
174:Sounds like a deal
48:Girolamo Savonarola
35:Girolamo Savonarola
24:Girolamo Savonarola
17:Middle gray and 18%
1445:deletion processes
1391:
1337:deletion processes
1283:
812:Google Earth Hacks
225:
1377:Proposed deletion
1287:File:Gno nega.jpg
1273:File:Gno nega.jpg
1269:Proposed deletion
1254:Theo's Little Bot
1238:File:Gno nega.jpg
1225:File:Gno nega.jpg
954:Little Nellie 007
623:
596:Template to use:
250:
112:Image:Gno neg.jpg
1485:
1468:
1438:
1437:
1421:
1420:
1388:
1360:
1330:
1329:
1313:
1312:
1280:
1101:
1069:
1067:
1053:
1021:Chabad-Lubavitch
920:
915:
882:
831:
679:
608:
385:
382:
256:Matthew Fletcher
236:
1493:
1492:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1462:
1449:speedy deletion
1435:
1434:
1418:
1417:
1386:
1384:
1354:
1341:speedy deletion
1327:
1326:
1310:
1309:
1278:
1276:
1265:
1248:Help:Image page
1229:
1211:Graham treadman
1200:
1165:
1155:Amir E. Aharoni
1134:
1112:
1099:
1079:
1065:
1051:
1037:
1017:
997:
983:
946:
932:
918:
913:
909:
880:
855:
841:
829:
814:
797:
782:
764:
750:
727:
706:
704:Yuriy Leonovich
692:
690:Bettina Redlich
677:
654:
639:
572:
554:
537:
477:
465:John Vandenberg
453:
438:
422:Kalanidhi Maran
418:
415:Kalanidhi Maran
401:
383:
380:
372:
358:
338:
319:
302:
278:
275:Daniel Terdiman
259:
252:
202:
155:
118:applied to the
108:
71:applied to the
61:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1491:
1489:
1459:for deletion.
1439:will stop the
1383:
1374:
1351:for deletion.
1331:will stop the
1275:
1266:
1241:
1240:
1232:Dear uploader:
1230:
1228:
1222:
1199:
1196:
1177:Pakistanphobia
1171:. The article
1164:
1163:Pakistanphobia
1161:
1133:
1130:
1111:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1078:
1075:
1034:
1016:
1014:Yehuda Krinsky
1011:
996:
993:
982:
977:
950:Ghost Stations
945:
942:
931:
926:
908:
905:
904:
903:
889:
888:
887:
854:
851:
840:
837:
813:
810:
796:
793:
787:Oicumayberight
781:
778:
763:
760:
749:
746:
726:
723:
719:
718:
705:
702:
691:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
653:
650:
638:
635:
627:
625:
624:
602:
601:
571:
568:
553:
550:
536:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
476:
471:
452:
449:
437:
432:
417:
412:
400:
398:Angie Phillips
394:
371:
368:
357:
352:
342:Jyrki Niskanen
337:
336:Jyrki Niskanen
334:
318:
313:
301:
298:
277:
272:
258:
253:
235:
218:
201:
198:
197:
196:
195:
194:
193:
192:
191:
190:
167:
166:
165:
164:
154:
151:
139:
138:
133:
107:
104:
92:
91:
86:
60:
57:
56:
55:
54:
53:
41:
40:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1490:
1481:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1466:
1460:
1458:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1431:
1429:
1425:
1414:
1412:
1406:
1402:
1400:
1396:
1382:
1378:
1375:
1373:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1358:
1352:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1323:
1321:
1317:
1306:
1304:
1298:
1294:
1292:
1288:
1274:
1270:
1267:
1264:
1261:
1259:
1255:
1250:. Thank you.
1249:
1245:
1239:
1236:
1235:
1233:
1226:
1223:
1221:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1209:
1205:
1197:
1195:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1162:
1160:
1159:
1156:
1151:
1149:
1144:
1142:
1137:
1131:
1129:
1128:
1125:
1122:. Thanks. -
1121:
1117:
1109:
1105:
1102:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1090:
1089:
1084:
1076:
1074:
1073:
1068:
1063:
1060:
1057:
1054:
1049:
1046:
1043:
1040:
1035:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1015:
1012:
1010:
1009:
1006:
1002:
994:
992:
991:
988:
981:
978:
976:
975:
972:
968:
964:
962:
959:As I said to
957:
955:
951:
943:
941:
940:
937:
930:
927:
925:
924:
921:
916:
906:
902:
899:
894:
890:
886:
883:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
869:
863:
858:
852:
850:
849:
846:
838:
836:
835:
832:
825:
824:
821:
820:
811:
809:
808:
805:
802:
795:Daniel Brandt
794:
792:
791:
788:
779:
777:
776:
773:
769:
761:
759:
758:
755:
747:
745:
744:
741:
740:
735:
734:
725:refs for Miah
724:
722:
715:
714:
713:
710:
703:
701:
700:
697:
689:
683:
680:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
665:
664:
659:
651:
649:
648:
645:
636:
634:
633:
630:
622:
619:
615:
611:
607:
606:
605:
600:{{subst:LVD}}
599:
598:
597:
594:
592:
588:
584:
579:
577:
569:
567:
566:
563:
559:
551:
549:
548:
545:
544:
534:
524:
521:
517:
516:
515:
512:
507:
506:
505:
502:
497:
496:
495:
492:
488:
487:
486:
485:
482:
475:
472:
470:
469:
466:
462:
458:
450:
448:
447:
444:
436:
433:
431:
430:
427:
423:
416:
413:
411:
410:
407:
399:
395:
393:
392:
388:
386:
377:
369:
367:
366:
363:
356:
353:
351:
350:
347:
343:
335:
333:
332:
329:
328:
324:
317:
314:
312:
310:
307:
299:
297:
296:
293:
288:
285:
282:
276:
273:
271:
270:
267:
262:
257:
254:
251:
248:
244:
240:
233:
229:
222:
217:
216:
213:
208:
199:
189:
186:
182:
181:
180:
177:
173:
172:
171:
170:
169:
168:
162:
161:
160:
159:
158:
153:IP (whatever)
152:
150:
148:
144:
137:
134:
132:
129:
128:
127:
124:
121:
117:
113:
105:
103:
101:
97:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
80:
77:
74:
70:
66:
58:
52:
49:
45:
44:
43:
42:
39:
36:
31:
30:
29:
28:
25:
16:
1465:page history
1461:
1443:, but other
1432:
1424:edit summary
1415:
1408:
1404:
1392:
1357:page history
1353:
1335:, but other
1324:
1316:edit summary
1307:
1300:
1296:
1284:
1251:
1242:
1231:
1201:
1166:
1152:
1145:
1139:I nominated
1138:
1135:
1113:
1110:List of pubs
1086:
1080:
1077:=Fujiprocess
1061:
1055:
1047:
1041:
1028:
1018:
998:
984:
969:
965:
958:
953:
949:
947:
936:Mus Musculus
933:
910:
865:
860:
856:
842:
826:
817:
815:
798:
783:
765:
751:
737:
731:
728:
720:
711:
707:
693:
661:
658:here is mine
655:
652:you know who
644:Michael Snow
640:
626:
609:
603:
595:
590:
586:
582:
580:
573:
555:
541:
538:
478:
454:
439:
419:
402:
373:
359:
339:
325:
320:
303:
292:Kevin Murray
289:
286:
283:
279:
263:
260:
247:subst:smile3
243:subst:smile2
226:
203:
156:
140:
125:
109:
93:
78:
62:
20:
1206:article is
1204:Mathew Chuk
1198:Mathew Chuk
1033:David Spart
907:Citing laws
898:Justanother
868:Justanother
839:credentials
766:Please see
762:Exhibitions
435:Sam Webster
346:Eludium-q36
311:Agha Nader
239:subst:smile
1471:FastilyBot
1363:FastilyBot
1185:Bless sins
1141:Mark Hucko
1059:block user
961:NawlinWiki
893:ad hominem
801:CastAStone
696:Agathoclea
593:eletions.
581:Mnemonic:
378:? Thanks!
306:Agha Nader
1457:consensus
1397:has been
1393:The file
1349:consensus
1289:has been
1285:The file
1066:block log
266:Reverieuk
143:OrphanBot
116:image tag
96:OrphanBot
69:image tag
1469:Thanks,
1361:Thanks,
1124:KSchutte
1045:contribs
987:Tyrenius
971:Goldburg
754:Tyrenius
629:Tyrenius
618:Tyrenius
604:Result:
558:utcursch
426:Eastmain
406:Oakshade
396:AfD for
362:Eastmain
245:}} or {{
232:WikiLove
212:Moondyne
1258:opt-out
1136:Hello,
845:MikeURL
585:ist of
535:Artists
323:Nuclear
228:frummer
207:Kafenio
200:Kafenio
1426:or on
1318:or on
1005:Bejnar
637:Brandt
461:SEETAL
451:SEETAL
287:Kevin
241:}}, {{
772:Hoary
717:page.
443:Khabs
384:notes
381:Grace
185:Rough
176:Rough
1475:talk
1367:talk
1215:talk
1189:talk
1120:here
1052:logs
1039:talk
919:ecis
768:this
610:Note
562:talk
327:Zer0
1379:of
1271:of
1100:Alf
1088:DGG
881:Alf
830:Alf
819:DGG
739:DGG
733:DGG
678:Alf
663:DGG
616:.
543:DGG
1477:)
1430:.
1413:.
1369:)
1322:.
1305:.
1217:)
1191:)
1150:.
1070:)
866:--
560:|
404:--
389:§
290:--
1473:(
1365:(
1260:)
1256:(
1213:(
1187:(
1062:·
1056:·
1048:·
1042:·
1036:(
914:A
803:|
591:D
587:V
583:L
499:-
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
