120:,'``.._ ,'``. :,--._:)\,:,._,.: All Glory to :`--,'' :`...';\ the HYPNO TOAD! `,' `---' `. / : / \ ,' :\.___,-. `...,---'``````-..._ |: \ ( ) ;: ) \ _,-. `. ( // `' \ : `.// ) ) , ; ,-|`. _,'/ ) ) ,' ,' ( :`.`-..____..=:.-': . _,' ,' `,'\ ``--....-)=' `._, \ ,') _ '``._ _.-/ _ `. (_) / )' ; / \ \`-.' `--( `-:`. `' ___..' _,-' |/ `.) `-. `.`.``-----``--, .' |/`.\`' ,','); SSt ` (/ (/
433:
poor article to get involved and make the article better during the AfD - it seems the old hands here have that attitude, but many newer people don't see the point. Anyway, a lot of the time AfDs end up coming out "the right way", no matter how many bad arguments are made - I guess we still have many good admins here. So I follow DGAF - I put forward an opinion for what it's worth, but then I let
Knowledge (XXG) sort itself out.
1992:
2042:, and my impression of secondary sources is that describing the sentiment using them may sound less neutral than presenting factual statements - which do suffer from major style problems, no doubt), but it's a fair argument and we can expect to get good-quality feedback from other editors and form a consensus in the current discussion or use it as a question in an RfC if it'll be necessary to get wider participation.
1581:
2088:
1725:
1253:. On one hand we have a man who devoted years of his life to meticulous scientific research to develop a vaccine for a deadly disease; on the other hand we have a woman who ate puke for money. Why are they both being interviewed by Larry King? Journalistic "neutrality"). But that's a whole different discussion. Let me know what you think of the changes I'm making to the allegations section.
35:
1399:...you want to remove "fucktard" from your last post. Totally, totally makes you feel better, but over the long term it can be bad for your reputation. I understand and agree with everything you said, spirit and words, right up until that last one. Doesn't matter, but ad hominem attacks just makes us look unreasonable over the long term.
738:
my own problems with Heath & Potter's definition of "counterculture", but it's still a really convincing argument. Good book generally: but if you find yourself rolling your eyes and cursing the authors after the first 20 pages, please try to struggle through it to part II. If nothing else, they do a good job of dissing Naomi Klein.
1797:
Yes, you are entirely right about that. But the
Bohemians called it "Czechy" even back then. It's not really important but it is seldom realized that there is no real dichotomy between those two words. Except of course in historiography, which I respect, so I wont revert you. I'm just being a "clever
1158:
Obviously SRA was a moral panic - what other interpretation can we find? But at the same time, it'd be nice to give some more weight to the idea that SRA was an actual conspiracy to rape babies for Satan. Because, y'know, it's so very stupid, and also will lead people into the late-90s idea that even
432:
A lot of the time, people make a snap decision based on rules, as if they were some sort of magical device. I just want to see rules applied, but with common sense in a way that help make a better
Knowledge (XXG). I also have become maybe a bit too harsh, as I also like people arguing for "keep" on a
354:
I really don't care one way or another about the group, as long as the information is accurate. As such I'll remove the prod but keep the page watched. If you can clean up the article and get some proper citation in there I'll check it out and back you up. If not, in about a month or two I'll put up
495:
Odd, that. Most of the people to come under attack from 4chan have been the ones who solve fiction AfDs with constant deletionist hardliner pile-ups. You're considerably more restrained. In any case, your user page got trashed and is now semi-protected. Drop me a note if you want the length changed.
1731:
Here is a kitten for you, as I'm no vandal, but an
English-speaking English person, not overly familiar with US spellings etc. If I wanted to vandalise your Wiki (and why would I. as a Socio-Anarchist, researching the inner workings of 'bent as a ten-bob note'; Governments and Elitist slimebuckets,
1514:
The latest sockpuppets vandalizing my talk page are almost certainly not RE. He has an almost pathological aversion to profanity, and I've pissed off a couple other sockpuppeting vandals lately. I don't give a shit about making RE angry; it's not like he can get any less rational. It's more that
1166:
Sorry dude, but it's a deep pile of goo you're wading into, and I prefer to see more chaos and confusion in society - so I'd like to see the goo go even deeper. Hell, we should give
Napolis admin rights at Knowledge (XXG). But as these are the opinions of a drunk Satanist chaos-mage, you might want
737:
just uses Veblen to explain the idea of (dunno how they describe it...) luxury consumption. It thus provides an explanation for why "countercultures" always sell out: the counterculture provides distinction, which adds to status, and therefore counterculture is a valuable commodity. Which, I've got
421:
Much thanks for trying to push for a truly accurate decision on some of the deletions I raised earlier today. Too often I feel that people just look for the quickest way to make a decision, and I greatly appreciate you trying to help generate a truly thorough decision, no matter how it turns out.
1189:
the idea is, and how people tend to go along with stupidity in the moment, but then years later disavow any involvement. This is one of the beautiful lessons to take from SRA - that people thought there was a grand conspiracy, but now those same people all purport that it was a silly joke and they
1154:
I'm more of a "journalistic neutrality" person - that is, I'm up for the journalistic neutrality style seen in the 60s and 70s, long before journalists became flaks for political positions and threw out their code of ethics. So, it'd be nice to include more claims in the article from kids of being
1114:
of them). Of course, there's a lot of secondary sources that also go through the claims while being newer, with the benefit of history and after the fact analysis. Do you have a preference for which to use, the original articles versus newer secondary sources? Might also be an idea more for the
1090:
Hey, I'm okay with anything. When I was 14 reading about an SRA case in my home town I knew it was retarded bullshit, even though it was presented as reality. I'd like to see more of the "SRA was reality" position in the article, the way the nutters like it... because then it looks even crazier to
1016:
If you're interested, have a look at the RFCU page. Once you know what they look like, they're easy to spot - redlinked talk and user page, three edits with one-word summaries, and generally a paste of the same information. Almost not worth tracking down or tagging the accounts, but eventually I
350:
There does need to be a lot of cleanup though. Although I appreciate the references, it's difficult to verify the claims. I tried, but couldn't find anything. Perhaps then, you could be more diligent in terms of citation and give actual page numbers (using the proper
Knowledge (XXG) template) so I
346:
Hey, thanks for responding to my prod, I was concerned that no one was looking at the article as it hadn't been edited in over a month. Prior to posting the prod I did check the original discussion, but still had concerns as most of the people who had defended the article seemed to be coming from
511:
Since you ask - and count yourself lucky for not knowing it earlier - 4chan isn't a person but a gargantuan imageboard. There are some smaller parts of it that, I'm told, have some intelligent content, but the place is pretty much synonymous with the board /b/, one of the more vile places on the
526:
4chan is basically where the internet goes to throw up at 4AM in the morning. The internet stays there, wallowing in its own filth while smoking some of the crack it was given by its own mother. He probably hits up his own child with some of white stuff. It then throws up again about 15 minutes
1823:
I just wanted to make sure you didn't think I was trying to cut off the discussion or anything. I saw that it had wound down for the last couple of days and thought it was ripe for achieving some resolution, and then I saw that you were still adding to it. Thanks for your comments and
536:
They have been increasingly often provoked to make such small-scale raids in the last few weeks, probably due to a single provocateur. :I'm torn between hoping that they'll go away quietly and hoping that they'll invade in force so that I can get to do some proper anti-vandalism work.
2064:
Anyway, hopefully I clarified my opinion. I don't want to say any more in the RfC, since the point of an RfC is to hear from other editors who weren't participating in the talk page discussion. Whatever comes of it is fine by me, but ultimately the article will follow the policies.
1840:
No, you're ok, I was repeating myself. Once the good points have all been made, any discussion at WP will devolve into restatement of cogent arguments vs constant naysaying until the discussion gets closed (or progressed, or whatever you've just done).
701:. Veblen's impact overall is probably less than those on your list, but I would credit the passage of the Sherman Anti-trust act in part to his writings. but the comment was mostly a compliment on your list. I should use it to homeschool my kids. :)
771:- "harassment" is the wording used by Sauer and Bocij, and her connection to the SRA panic was found in the harassment of people. Is it a BLP concern if it's accurate and sourced to a reliable publication? I don't know, I don't edit BLP pages much.
1694:
as the northern terminus, but hadn't noticed at the time that he had also made that error, and I've never really gone back to scrutinize the image again since then. So I apologize for my own corollary oversight, but it was Earl's error first.
981:
recently I think. As fair warning, though - if
Napolis is editing her own page, any dispute will likely end up being seen by several editors, in which case you might want to go over the article with a fine-tooth comb to ensure it passes
1732:
finding this Wiki interesting, education, yada), I'd have taken 10 gallons of red paint, 4 teaspoons of purple glitter and a nip of toad piss, and scrawled 'REVOLUTION' at a 43.2 degree angle over it. Peace, and no hard feelings.
1555:
a world-spanning conspiracy of
Satanists who rape babies with lobsters on hot-air balloons under the ocean aided by players from the Los Angeles Dodgers, then... well... seriously, where is Douglas Adams when you really need him?
1060:
is in the right place? 'Cause right now you're on the "SRA was a moral panic" position. Sure we could expand the individual cases, but not to portray them as proof of the existence of SRA as reality rather than moral panic.
588:
Pink Floyd tells us to put our effort where we have the best payoff, because it's always almost too late. Well, not really - I think they're actually just trying to bum us out. But I'll misinterpret Pink Floyd in my own way.
372:
Haha, god bless the Wiki eh? Your edits are actually much better and the citations are easier to understand. I'll check them later, but I dumped the hoax tag. Thanks for this, now I'm actually interested in reading more.
2133:
1109:
thing - we don't need to call it crazy since it's so obviously crazy. I'm OK with that - judicious use of the then-extant sources to justify the facts of claims (but I would still oppose their use to justify the
1126:, so basically to establish where the consensus is regarding whether it's a moral panic or not. It's a vote, not a !vote, but it's not really binding so much as it is to establish where the consensus is.
1768:
It doesn't really matter outside of the
English language as used in the beginning of the last century and before. Czech and Bohemian are basically the same thing when it comes to the state described.
2117:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1492:
1167:
to discount them in your final tally. I'm not much of a contributor to the article anyway, not nearly as much as you. I just want the damn
Schnoebelen/Todd/Napolis pages to get undeleted, dammit!
449:
1017:
may do another RFCU in order to ask for a hardblock of the IP address. Re:Napolis, it was pretty banal (just an addition of her Ritual Abuse case list) as an EL, but I'm expecting escalation.
2102:
1185:, similar to Germans in the reign of the Nazis. Should one give more weight to millions of bozos, or to 20 or 30 "ivory-tower intellectuals"? Part of my interest in SRA is how prima-facie
551:
a bit odd that personal userpages are unprotected by default, openness is considered to be a basic principle of the site. Exceptions are made out of need and very seldom pre-emptively.
922:
977:
I think I've got the SRA and Napolis articles in my watchlists. Otherwise, though, I haven't had enough interactions with RE to take any notice of anything. I did revert an edit by
801:
1547:
a world-spanning conspiracy of Satanists who rape babies with lobsters on hot-air balloons under the ocean aided by players from the Los Angeles Dodgers, and it makes him
925:. Anyway, the socking has increased in recent weeks, using a series of throwaway accounts to shove POV-pushing bullshit into a variety of articles. The recent edits to
347:
single purpose accounts. Thanks for removing the word "practicing" I probably wouldn't have even gave the article a second glance had that term not set off alarm bells.
1155:
kidnapped and taken in a spaceship to an underwater city where they were raped with a lobster by an LA Dodgers baseball star. (You can see I've read the literature.)
1606:, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at
2004:
No idea where I am, but wish to express my appreciation for your (if it is yours) contribution to the Gabriel Marcel article. Never heard of him before reading
804:. I'm not sure what the OR issue would be though, is it "harassment" again? I still think it's OK visa-vis Bocij, which is published by the highly reliable
1617:. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found
125:
675:", which uses him as a basis for their main thesis. So far, Veblen looks okay, but not yet in the same class as those I have on my list. Definitely no
90:
1281:
Well, y'know, a neutral presentation of craziness won't make it look less crazy. Just as long as the craziness doesn't take over the entire article.
1159:
the "Satanic cults" memories were planted to cover up CIA mind control experiments or alien abductions, and so on. In seriousness, journalistic tone
553:
If you really want one, I can see what I can do; if not, can I interest you in a vandalism counter? They come in handy userbox size nowadays, too. --
1902:
was the best thing ever. I am still laughing over that, as well as the citation to MEMRI's "Panic in Khartoum" article :o) Keep up the good work!
1116:
1298:
I did see a source refer to that particular allegation, but it didn't link it to a specific case. If you've got references on hand, be my guest!
1699:
1436:
I would agree too if you could remove that word. It only makes him angrier, as you can see with his latest sockpuppet's user name. Cheers, --
2156:
86:
42:
1968:
and agreed with the lack of contemporary reviews. I managed to find a 1988 year-end round-up from Melody Maker and added it to the page.--
1702:
to see if we can get it updated for both the lake error and conformity with contemporary visual standards for mapping on Knowledge (XXG).
55:
1783:
Every English-language Knowledge (XXG) article about this state during the high middle ages refers to it as the "Kingdom of Bohemia".
1495:, which is why the latest posts were removed (permanently deleted; no diffs). A risky but perhaps necessary move, don't you agree? :)
1939:
1920:
They can't cover it up forever. The only question is how deeply Hillary Clinton is involved. WE'RE THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS PEOPLE
620:
610:
255:
51:
697:
Right. although, everytime I hear someone talk about the inherent propriety and piety of the wealthy and hard working I think of
1402:
I've been talked down and away from similar sentiments in the past by other editors and appreciated it. Just payin' it forward.
2152:
1862:
1831:
698:
2126:
1163:
one to put forward "he said/she said" info, and let the reader make their own decision. And I am happy with stupid decisions.
547:
Anyway, I'm reluctant to infinitely (semi-) protect your userpage, at least without hitting the help pages first: though it
1942:
article was **deleted** by a user named "A Man in Black", who was permabanned from Knowledge (XXG) in 2009 for canvassing.
1326:
Most common google result for "raped by a lobster" is a John Waters movie. That's...oddly appropriate on a lot of levels.
617:! And if you are not an American, then have a happy day and a wonderful weekend anyway! :) Your friend and colleague, --
529:
137:
522:
333:
1002:
PS - I prefer reading her newsgroup posts. Thanks for reminding me to check up on things - she disappeared for a while.
978:
930:
1855:
Honestly not sure myself what I've done. I just didn't want it to trail off without some guidance on what to do next.
1622:
1592:
656:
fits in quite well against that backdrop of thinkers and topics. Also, I hate you for picking that name before me. :)
2138:
2066:
2034:! I don't necessarily agree (I think it's a rather arbitrary narrowing of scope and sourcing that isn't prescribed by
1943:
1921:
1871:
1842:
1784:
1750:
1663:
1557:
1466:
1452:
1334:
1282:
1220:
1199:
1168:
1092:
1003:
987:
739:
684:
633:
590:
463:
434:
288:
246:
101:
1119:
than the main article, which is already very long and can't really include more details on a lot of individual cases.
63:
840:
set of edits, do you think it's OK with BLP now? If you're not sure, I may re-post on BLPN and ask for a review.
805:
1599:
1523:
1415:
1361:
1306:
1261:
1134:
1069:
1025:
956:
945:
884:
848:
816:
800:
Note that since I'm not sure, and I usually learn stuff when I post on noticeboards, I've asked the BLP question
779:
1245:
a while ago, and a big loather of the "balance" presented in the news coverage of vaccination - I'm sorry, but
392:
I dunno, I rather enjoyed reading your opinions on your User Page! I didn't think it was a waste of space :) ≈
2114:
671:
Yeah, I haven't gotten around to reading him yet. Closest I've come to, right now, is Heath & Potter's "
329:
1739:
355:
the prod again. I have the page watched so I'll keep an eye out and tried to lend whatever feedback I can.
1607:
1451:
In short, no. #1, it's true, #2 it was required, and #3, the entire talk page seems to be deleted anyway.
585:
393:
1614:
1588:
586:
The sun is the same in a relative way, but you're older - shorter of breath, and one day closer to death.
1591:
on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a
2013:
2009:
1899:
1618:
575:
351:
can more easily track the information down. That way, the article will be less likely to be deleted.
340:
191:
2096:
374:
359:
2047:
1910:
1859:
1828:
1629:
1628:
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
1603:
918:
58:. Please limit discussion to improvement of this page. You may wish to ask factual questions about
2110:
1528:
1420:
1366:
1311:
1266:
1139:
1074:
1030:
961:
889:
853:
821:
784:
1973:
1246:
680:
325:
206:
16:
1123:
153:
1707:
1691:
1687:
1652:
724:
706:
661:
133:
2122:
1181:
PS - what's undue weight, really? Millions of people believed that SRA was true: or at least
1106:
570:
Thanks for your input. It certainly doesn't hold me blameless, but I think it is quite fair.
2145:
2061:, all the best articles conform with it, and all the dumpster-fire-level articles ignore it.
1735:
1683:
653:
614:
268:
2125:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2118:
1531:
1423:
1369:
1314:
1269:
1142:
1077:
1033:
983:
964:
892:
856:
824:
787:
564:
474:
1965:
1803:
1773:
1496:
1437:
1241:
571:
501:
311:
259:
236:
187:
156:
2058:
2035:
1515:
it makes us, the proponents of the moral panic hypothesis, look as irrational as he is.
933:
being in my mind, certainly by RE. Just as an FYI, to expect it to happen again. Also,
2160:
2074:
2051:
2017:
1991:
1977:
1951:
1929:
1914:
1895:
1879:
1865:
1850:
1834:
1807:
1792:
1777:
1758:
1743:
1711:
1671:
1656:
1634:
1565:
1538:
1499:
1474:
1460:
1440:
1430:
1376:
1342:
1321:
1290:
1276:
1228:
1207:
1176:
1149:
1100:
1084:
1040:
1011:
995:
971:
899:
863:
831:
794:
747:
728:
710:
692:
665:
641:
626:
598:
579:
557:
541:
505:
484:
466:
456:
437:
426:
410:
400:
377:
362:
314:
296:
282:
271:
262:
249:
239:
225:
210:
195:
176:
159:
141:
109:
94:
2043:
1906:
1856:
1825:
1250:
672:
2039:
512:
entire Internet. Its members would probably be proud of this description, quoted from
1969:
1520:
1412:
1358:
1303:
1258:
1131:
1066:
1022:
953:
934:
881:
845:
813:
776:
766:
423:
222:
202:
527:
later, and, despite all rational hope and logic, somehow manages to stay conscious.
1703:
1648:
720:
702:
657:
481:
453:
407:
279:
129:
2087:
1724:
1580:
1091:
anyone with an ounce of sense. Is that !vote section even to be taken seriously?
1195:
926:
513:
173:
1587:
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to
1799:
1769:
1686:. I later made a minor modification to it because he had incorrectly labelled
734:
676:
554:
538:
497:
20:
1602:
to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only
1330:
1516:
1408:
1354:
1299:
1254:
1127:
1062:
1018:
949:
877:
841:
809:
772:
59:
47:
2129:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
2106:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1191:
719:. Thanks for mentioning that, I'm snagging it from the library ASAP.
310:
Man, I just saw your name again... and it made me extremely happy. --
2057:
That's not a narrowing of scope, though - it's really a big part of
254:
Hahaha... yes. Seriously, best username ever. It actually beats out
921:? If so, you're almost certainly aware of his/her permablock for
2142:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1212:
I've only just started, but were you thinking of something like
235:
I am rhythmically, unconsciously clapping for your username. --
24:
2132:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
2100:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
652:
Love your overlord syllabus. If I may suggest another name?
519:
287:
Sorry to see you got permabanned for doing your job, Lugnuts.
29:
1723:
1579:
937:
has been editing her own page, which I'm watching out for
1938:
A bit of sleuthing 5 years later and I find out that the
72:
Ha ha, it's funny cos the Reference Desk knows your mom.
2113:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
2031:
1644:
1350:
1295:
C'mon man, don't make me type in "raped by lobster" :*(
1213:
1057:
941:
938:
873:
869:
837:
769:
100:
I find the most erotic part of a woman is the boobies.
1598:
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not
245:
Would you like a complementary Brain Slug with that?
1824:participation, I think it was definitely valuable.
1621:, and the general policy for the trial can be found
1819:
Re: RfC on Notability of D&D Standard Creatures
221:I stopped by to say you have an amazing name. :)
986:. I'm nagging, but it's still worth mentioning.
917:Were you one of those who had interactions with
1249:is insulted when his "opponent" in a debate is
1198:, don't care, back to drinking now, talk soon.
319:
765:I'd like to revert the last edit you made to
8:
1543:If it makes us irrational to believe there
258:, and I didn't think that was possible. --
1964:Noticed your comment on the talk page for
1798:d*****" at this point. Sorry about that.
1700:Knowledge (XXG):Graphics Lab/Map workshop
473:
1117:list of satanic ritual abuse allegations
632:DEATH TO AMERICA! DEATH TO GEORGE BUSH!
1405:As ever, your userid is epic awesome,
733:Meh, I'm not so into class analysis -
1894:I read that the Koro article was the
1190:personally weren't involved. Anyway,
7:
2097:2023 Arbitration Committee elections
1613:For the guideline on reviewing, see
872:on my talk page, and note that I've
613:, I just wanted to wish you a Happy
76:All glory to the Hypnotoad goes here
2115:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
2081:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
1662:Gave you something to do, no? :-)
1239:journalistic neutrality (finished
320:I'm sure you get this all the time
14:
1940:Penis-melting Zionist robot combs
1595:scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
1465:And, btw, truth is unreasonable.
876:mentally ill from Loftus' page.
452:. Knocking WP up a notch. BAM!!
324:But your username is brilliant!
256:User:Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo
2086:
1990:
1219:Sure, but more lobsters please.
33:
2136:and submit your choices on the
1682:It was created and uploaded by
699:The Theory of the Leisure Class
172:Coolest. User name. Eh-vuh! :D
81:It seems we have similar taste!
2018:13:11, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
277:BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!
87:What makes a man turn neutral?
1:
2161:00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
1952:18:21, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
1930:14:47, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
1915:19:28, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
1905:ALL GLORY to the Hypnotoad.--
1900:your comment on the talk page
1880:02:43, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
1866:23:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
1851:22:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
1835:22:28, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
1322:20:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
1291:20:07, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
1277:18:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
1229:20:07, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
1208:01:52, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
1177:01:47, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
1150:13:26, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
1101:03:03, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
1085:01:54, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
506:23:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
211:23:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
196:18:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
110:00:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
95:20:17, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
46:for general discussion about
1672:22:52, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
1657:03:26, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
1041:17:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
1012:17:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
996:16:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
972:15:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
900:22:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
864:15:54, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
832:12:57, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
795:12:28, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
622:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
558:17:38, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
542:17:20, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
160:20:32, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
2075:22:17, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
2052:18:33, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
297:23:30, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
267:Cool name, cool interests.
2179:
2153:MediaWiki message delivery
1808:00:14, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
1793:00:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
1778:00:04, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
1759:13:49, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
1744:13:42, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
1604:a small number of articles
1566:22:47, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
1539:19:45, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
1500:23:13, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
1491:What was required was the
1475:20:25, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
1461:20:19, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
1441:16:18, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
1431:02:20, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
1343:02:55, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
806:Greenwood Publishing Group
599:15:32, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
580:00:37, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
485:11:10, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
467:18:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
457:17:56, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
450:Containment theory records
438:14:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
427:05:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
411:20:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
401:13:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
315:00:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
226:16:22, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
177:19:01, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
1989:
1978:22:01, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
1635:06:17, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
1615:Knowledge (XXG):Reviewing
1589:review other users' edits
1377:14:12, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
1353:edit really satisfying.
1329:I would have expected an
946:talk:satanic ritual abuse
619:Happy Independence Day!
334:15:22, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
283:18:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
186:Is awesome. That is all.
142:01:17, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
2150:to your user talk page.
2070:
2006:Edwin Muir: Man and Poet
1947:
1925:
1875:
1846:
1788:
1754:
1712:17:29, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
1667:
1608:Special:OldReviewedPages
1561:
1526:Knowledge (XXG)'s rules:
1493:outing of ResearchEditor
1470:
1456:
1418:Knowledge (XXG)'s rules:
1364:Knowledge (XXG)'s rules:
1338:
1309:Knowledge (XXG)'s rules:
1286:
1264:Knowledge (XXG)'s rules:
1224:
1203:
1172:
1137:Knowledge (XXG)'s rules:
1096:
1072:Knowledge (XXG)'s rules:
1028:Knowledge (XXG)'s rules:
1007:
991:
959:Knowledge (XXG)'s rules:
887:Knowledge (XXG)'s rules:
851:Knowledge (XXG)'s rules:
819:Knowledge (XXG)'s rules:
782:Knowledge (XXG)'s rules:
748:16:52, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
743:
729:16:49, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
711:16:45, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
693:16:25, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
688:
666:16:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
637:
627:21:18, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
594:
378:03:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
363:19:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
292:
272:03:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
263:13:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
250:14:19, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
240:04:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
105:
1698:I'll post a request at
642:23:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
605:Happy Independence Day!
2067:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
1944:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
1922:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
1872:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
1843:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
1785:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
1751:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
1728:
1664:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
1584:
1558:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
1467:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
1453:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
1335:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
1283:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
1221:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
1200:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
1169:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
1093:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
1004:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
988:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
944:and the already-known
740:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
685:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
634:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
591:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
464:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
435:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
289:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
247:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
201:Yup, one of the best.
102:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
2111:Arbitration Committee
2094:Hello! Voting in the
1998:The Original Barnstar
1727:
1583:
942:talk:Steven Spielberg
448:In case you miss it:
128:comment was added by
341:Order of Nine Angles
50:. Any such comments
1983:A barnstar for you!
1960:My Bloody Valentine
919:User:ResearchEditor
85:... in the ladies?
2127:arbitration policy
1870:no, you did good.
1729:
1585:
1183:went along with it
1105:So for you it's a
1056:Are you sure your
681:Netochka Nezvanova
476:File:Hypnotoad.gif
116:A little something
45:
2163:
2023:
2022:
2008:by Peter Butter.
1898:In fact, I think
1890:"best thing ever"
1764:Czech or Bohemian
1720:A kitten for you!
1551:to believe there
1527:
1419:
1365:
1310:
1265:
1138:
1073:
1029:
960:
940:. Also edits to
888:
852:
820:
783:
534:
533:
396:The Haunted Angel
145:
70:
69:
41:
2170:
2151:
2149:
2090:
2032:for this comment
1994:
1987:
1986:
1800:Gerard von Hebel
1770:Gerard von Hebel
1684:User:Earl Andrew
1632:
1535:
1519:
1427:
1411:
1373:
1357:
1318:
1302:
1273:
1257:
1146:
1130:
1081:
1065:
1037:
1021:
968:
952:
896:
880:
860:
844:
828:
812:
791:
775:
654:Thorstein Veblen
625:
623:
615:Independence Day
520:
479:
477:
397:
231:Eeeeeeexcellent.
123:
37:
36:
30:
2178:
2177:
2173:
2172:
2171:
2169:
2168:
2167:
2166:
2165:
2143:
2091:
2083:
2028:
1985:
1962:
1896:best thing ever
1892:
1821:
1766:
1722:
1680:
1642:
1630:
1593:two-month trial
1578:
1536:
1533:
1428:
1425:
1397:
1374:
1371:
1319:
1316:
1274:
1271:
1242:Flat Earth News
1147:
1144:
1082:
1079:
1051:
1038:
1035:
969:
966:
912:
897:
894:
861:
858:
836:Have a look at
829:
826:
792:
789:
760:
650:
621:
618:
611:nice Wikipedian
607:
568:
493:
491:Page protection
475:
462:Ah. Good idea.
446:
419:
408:Amir E. Aharoni
395:
390:
344:
322:
233:
219:
184:
170:
151:
124:—The preceding
121:
118:
83:
78:
34:
28:
12:
11:
5:
2176:
2174:
2134:the candidates
2103:eligible users
2092:
2085:
2084:
2082:
2079:
2078:
2077:
2062:
2027:
2024:
2021:
2020:
2001:
2000:
1995:
1984:
1981:
1966:Isn't Anything
1961:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1955:
1954:
1933:
1932:
1891:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1820:
1817:
1815:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1765:
1762:
1746:
1721:
1718:
1716:
1679:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1641:
1638:
1577:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1532:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1463:
1444:
1443:
1424:
1396:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1370:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1315:
1296:
1270:
1251:Jenny McCarthy
1233:
1232:
1231:
1179:
1164:
1156:
1143:
1120:
1078:
1050:
1049:Right section?
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1034:
999:
998:
965:
914:Hi Hypnotoad,
911:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
893:
857:
825:
788:
762:Hi Hypnotoad,
759:
756:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
717:the rebel sell
713:
673:The Rebel Sell
649:
646:
645:
644:
606:
603:
602:
601:
567:
562:
561:
560:
552:
532:
531:
528:
524:
518:
517:
492:
489:
488:
487:
480:
470:
469:
445:
442:
441:
440:
418:
417:AfD discussion
415:
414:
413:
389:
388:Wasting Space?
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
343:
337:
321:
318:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
232:
229:
218:
215:
214:
213:
183:
180:
169:
166:
164:
150:
147:
119:
117:
114:
113:
112:
82:
79:
77:
74:
68:
67:
64:Reference desk
52:may be removed
38:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2175:
2164:
2162:
2158:
2154:
2147:
2141:
2140:
2135:
2130:
2128:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2112:
2107:
2105:
2104:
2099:
2098:
2089:
2080:
2076:
2072:
2068:
2063:
2060:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2049:
2045:
2041:
2037:
2033:
2025:
2019:
2015:
2011:
2007:
2003:
2002:
1999:
1996:
1993:
1988:
1982:
1980:
1979:
1975:
1971:
1967:
1959:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1941:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1931:
1927:
1923:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1903:
1901:
1897:
1889:
1881:
1877:
1873:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1864:
1861:
1858:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1848:
1844:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1833:
1830:
1827:
1818:
1816:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1775:
1771:
1763:
1761:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1747:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1733:
1726:
1719:
1717:
1714:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1696:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1639:
1637:
1636:
1633:
1626:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1611:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1600:autoconfirmed
1596:
1594:
1590:
1582:
1575:
1567:
1563:
1559:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1537:
1529:
1525:
1522:
1518:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1501:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1442:
1439:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1429:
1421:
1417:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1403:
1400:
1394:
1378:
1375:
1367:
1363:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1349:You may find
1348:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1327:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1320:
1312:
1308:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1275:
1267:
1263:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1243:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1217:
1215:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1165:
1162:
1157:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1148:
1140:
1136:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1118:
1113:
1108:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1083:
1075:
1071:
1068:
1064:
1059:
1054:
1048:
1042:
1039:
1031:
1027:
1024:
1020:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
1000:
997:
993:
989:
985:
980:
976:
975:
974:
973:
970:
962:
958:
955:
951:
947:
943:
939:
936:
935:Diana Napolis
932:
928:
924:
923:sockpuppeting
920:
915:
909:
901:
898:
890:
886:
883:
879:
875:
871:
867:
866:
865:
862:
854:
850:
847:
843:
839:
835:
834:
833:
830:
822:
818:
815:
811:
807:
803:
799:
798:
797:
796:
793:
785:
781:
778:
774:
770:
768:
767:Diana Napolis
763:
758:Diana Napolis
757:
749:
745:
741:
736:
732:
731:
730:
726:
722:
718:
714:
712:
708:
704:
700:
696:
695:
694:
690:
686:
682:
678:
674:
670:
669:
668:
667:
663:
659:
655:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
630:
629:
628:
624:
616:
612:
609:As you are a
604:
600:
596:
592:
587:
584:
583:
582:
581:
577:
573:
566:
563:
559:
556:
550:
546:
545:
544:
543:
540:
525:
521:
515:
510:
509:
508:
507:
503:
499:
490:
486:
483:
478:
472:
471:
468:
465:
461:
460:
459:
458:
455:
451:
443:
439:
436:
431:
430:
429:
428:
425:
416:
412:
409:
405:
404:
403:
402:
399:
398:
387:
379:
376:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
361:
356:
352:
348:
342:
338:
336:
335:
331:
327:
326:Movementarian
317:
316:
313:
298:
294:
290:
286:
285:
284:
281:
278:
275:
274:
273:
270:
266:
265:
264:
261:
257:
253:
252:
251:
248:
244:
243:
242:
241:
238:
230:
228:
227:
224:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
199:
198:
197:
193:
189:
182:Your username
181:
179:
178:
175:
167:
165:
162:
161:
158:
155:
149:A little more
148:
146:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
115:
111:
107:
103:
99:
98:
97:
96:
92:
88:
80:
75:
73:
65:
61:
57:
53:
49:
44:
40:This page is
39:
32:
31:
26:
22:
18:
2137:
2131:
2108:
2101:
2095:
2093:
2029:
2005:
1997:
1963:
1904:
1893:
1822:
1814:
1767:
1748:
1734:
1730:
1715:
1697:
1690:rather than
1681:
1643:
1640:Bez (dancer)
1627:
1612:
1597:
1586:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1407:
1404:
1401:
1398:
1240:
1236:
1186:
1182:
1160:
1111:
1055:
1052:
916:
913:
764:
761:
716:
651:
608:
569:
548:
535:
494:
447:
444:Reply on AFD
420:
394:
391:
357:
353:
349:
345:
323:
309:
276:
234:
220:
185:
171:
168:Just to say:
163:
152:
122:
84:
71:
25:myspace spam
19:articles in
2139:voting page
1736:Bananaskinz
1678:Hwy6map.png
1333:reference.
1247:Paul Offitt
927:moral panic
648:Great minds
514:Everything2
422:Cheers! --
269:Hypnosadist
188:Tim Vickers
43:not a forum
2123:topic bans
2030:Thank you
2010:Khrystyna2
1647:→ ??? 8-/
1497:Cesar Tort
1438:Cesar Tort
1196:chaos-mage
1124:straw poll
868:There's a
735:Rebel Sell
715:Also, re:
677:John Titor
572:Erechtheus
406:Me too. --
358:Cheers! --
312:Kicking222
260:Kicking222
237:Kicking222
154:click here
56:refactored
21:Indie rock
2119:site bans
2044:PaulT2022
2026:Thank you
1907:FeralOink
1863:(contrib)
1857:Eggishorn
1832:(contrib)
1826:Eggishorn
1331:Einar Orn
910:Some FYIs
375:Wolfrider
360:Wolfrider
157:Hypnotoad
17:6,884,724
1970:Larrybob
1692:McKerrow
1688:Espanola
1631:Tiptoety
1576:Reviewer
1549:rational
1395:Maybe...
424:fuzzy510
223:Zidel333
203:Pairadox
138:contribs
126:unsigned
60:your mom
48:your mom
2146:NoACEMM
1704:Bearcat
1649:Skarebo
1534:complex
1426:complex
1372:complex
1317:complex
1272:complex
1192:Satanic
1187:stoopid
1145:complex
1122:It's a
1112:reality
1107:WP:NPOV
1080:complex
1036:complex
967:complex
895:complex
874:removed
859:complex
827:complex
790:complex
721:Protonk
703:Protonk
658:Protonk
482:Lugnuts
454:Lugnuts
280:Lugnuts
130:The wub
62:at the
1860:(talk)
1829:(talk)
1194:drunk
1161:allows
1053:Hola,
984:WP:BLP
979:Nocob5
931:Nocob5
565:WP:WQA
174:Wysdom
2059:WP:OR
2036:WP:OR
1545:isn't
870:reply
555:Kizor
539:Kizor
498:Kizor
2157:talk
2109:The
2071:talk
2048:talk
2040:WP:V
2014:talk
1974:talk
1948:talk
1926:talk
1911:talk
1876:talk
1847:talk
1804:talk
1789:talk
1774:talk
1755:talk
1749:WUT
1740:talk
1708:talk
1668:talk
1653:talk
1623:here
1619:here
1562:talk
1471:talk
1457:talk
1351:this
1339:talk
1287:talk
1237:HATE
1225:talk
1214:this
1204:talk
1173:talk
1097:talk
1058:vote
1008:talk
992:talk
838:this
802:here
744:talk
725:talk
707:talk
689:talk
662:talk
638:talk
595:talk
576:talk
502:talk
339:Re:
330:Talk
293:talk
207:talk
192:talk
134:talk
106:talk
91:talk
23:and
1524:(c)
1521:(t)
1517:WLU
1416:(c)
1413:(t)
1409:WLU
1362:(c)
1359:(t)
1355:WLU
1307:(c)
1304:(t)
1300:WLU
1262:(c)
1259:(t)
1255:WLU
1135:(c)
1132:(t)
1128:WLU
1070:(c)
1067:(t)
1063:WLU
1026:(c)
1023:(t)
1019:WLU
957:(c)
954:(t)
950:WLU
948:.
929:by
885:(c)
882:(t)
878:WLU
849:(c)
846:(t)
842:WLU
817:(c)
814:(t)
810:WLU
808:.
780:(c)
777:(t)
773:WLU
679:or
54:or
2159:)
2148:}}
2144:{{
2121:,
2073:)
2050:)
2016:)
1976:)
1950:)
1928:)
1913:)
1878:)
1849:)
1806:)
1791:)
1776:)
1757:)
1742:)
1710:)
1670:)
1655:)
1625:.
1610:.
1564:)
1553:is
1473:)
1459:)
1341:)
1289:)
1235:I
1227:)
1216:?
1206:)
1175:)
1099:)
1010:)
994:)
746:)
727:)
709:)
691:)
683:.
664:)
640:)
597:)
578:)
549:is
537:--
530:”
523:“
504:)
496:--
373:--
332:)
295:)
217:Hi
209:)
194:)
140:)
136:•
108:)
93:)
2155:(
2069:(
2046:(
2038:/
2012:(
1972:(
1946:(
1924:(
1909:(
1874:(
1845:(
1802:(
1787:(
1772:(
1753:(
1738:(
1706:(
1666:(
1651:(
1645:∆
1560:(
1530:/
1469:(
1455:(
1422:/
1368:/
1337:(
1313:/
1285:(
1268:/
1223:(
1202:(
1171:(
1141:/
1095:(
1076:/
1032:/
1006:(
990:(
963:/
891:/
855:/
823:/
786:/
742:(
723:(
705:(
687:(
660:(
636:(
593:(
574:(
516::
500:(
328:(
291:(
205:(
190:(
144:.
132:(
104:(
89:(
66:.
27:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.