302:(I assume that's where you've been working on additional material). Can I ask why you're considering deleting the entire existing page? I'm not expert in the topic, but there does seem to be some real information in the existing page, though it's quite short and only partly cited. Are you planning to retain any of that material in your revised version? If so, you're not really deleting the whole article. Another way to answer your question is that nothing in the existing article is sacred -- if you can improve any part of it, feel free to do so. However, you shouldn't remove information if you're not simultaneously replacing it with better information on the same topic.
251:
have one heading for the stages and a separate heading for the hypotheses. Also, all the animal sections were extremely interesting. Maybe include more direct explanations as to how they pertain to babbling specifically, rather than language development in general, if that makes sense. In the manual babbling in deaf infants there seems to be enough information for a whole separate page, which is awesome, but you might want to choose what is particularly relevant to babbling or split it up so it's not too overwhelming. Other than that it was very well-written and informative!
161:
112:
343:
Yes, I think that material can probably go -- as you say some of it seems correct but if you're planning to put in some referenced discussion of the topic there's no reason to keep the unreferenced material. Generally I try not to delete unreferenced material if I think it's accurate; I would rather
307:
If you don't mind my asking, can you tell me why you're working on
Misaacso's talk page, instead of editing the article directly? It looks like there's quite a bit of good material in your draft, and if you work directly on the article you sometimes get the side benefit of having other editors show
270:
I just got your message -- I'm at work at the moment but will take a look this evening and will post a note here. Without looking at it yet, I can tell you that it's fine to do anything to a page up to and including completely replacing it so long as it's an improvement. There's usually no need to
250:
Your page looks very good overall! It is extremely informative and researched. I don't know who wrote what, so I'll just give all my overall suggestions. My main suggestion would just be to divide things up a little bit, specifically the initial section about stages of babbling. You could possibly
70:
65:
60:
188:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you.
139:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you.
344:
find a citation for it, or failing that, replace it with material that covers the same ground that I can cite. It sounds like that's the approach you're taking, so that's fine. Let me know if you have any other questions.
378:
about the
Knowledge (XXG) Education Program. This is our opportunity to improve the program and resources we provide students, so your feedback and input is integral to our future success. Thank you so much!
227:, a forum on Knowledge (XXG) for new editors to ask questions about editing Knowledge (XXG), and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!
213:
308:
up to help with the new material. It's up to you, of course, but I think one of the fun things about
Knowledge (XXG) is working on live articles.
357:
330:
284:
353:
326:
280:
51:
Welcome to the
Psychology of Language Knowledge (XXG) course project. Below are links related to our course that may be helpful to you.
313:
If you have more questions I'm happy to respond here or by email; or if you prefer we can do an online chat session. I've watchlisted
184:
178:
135:
129:
179:
130:
185:
136:
35:
384:
55:
349:
322:
276:
169:
120:
23:
232:
165:
116:
380:
224:
81:
256:
345:
318:
299:
272:
90:
228:
194:
145:
375:
31:
77:
252:
190:
141:
212:
176:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
127:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
27:
314:
295:
100:
271:
do that, but it's not forbidden or anything like that. More later --
388:
361:
334:
288:
260:
236:
198:
173:
149:
124:
85:
39:
168:
and
Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion, you should
119:
and
Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion, you should
164:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
115:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
317:
and will keep an eye on it, and see if I can help out.
204:
Welcome to
Knowledge (XXG): check out the Teahouse!
71:Posting location for Empirical Article Summaries
370:Knowledge (XXG) Education Program Student Survey
8:
374:Hi! Please take a few minutes to fill out
76:Let me know if you have any questions. --
66:List of User Pages for your Classmates
7:
61:Psychology of Language Course Page
14:
211:
183:
177:
159:
134:
128:
110:
1:
294:Mandy, I just took a look at
86:19:49, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
40:04:15, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
404:
362:10:31, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
335:22:09, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
289:16:12, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
261:14:38, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
237:22:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
199:14:08, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
150:14:21, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
223:, you are invited to the
56:APS Knowledge (XXG) Tools
389:19:20, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
16:Hey, I found you back!
47:Psychology of Language
300:User talk:Misaacso
243:
242:
155:Your recent edits
106:Your recent edits
43:
26:comment added by
395:
381:JMathewson (WMF)
215:
208:
207:
187:
181:
163:
162:
138:
132:
114:
113:
42:
20:
19:Hey Feeksters!
403:
402:
398:
397:
396:
394:
393:
392:
372:
268:
248:
239:
206:
172:by typing four
170:sign your posts
160:
157:
123:by typing four
121:sign your posts
111:
108:
98:
49:
21:
12:
11:
5:
401:
399:
371:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
338:
337:
310:
309:
304:
303:
298:, and also at
267:
264:
247:
244:
241:
240:
218:
216:
205:
202:
156:
153:
107:
104:
97:
94:
74:
73:
68:
63:
58:
48:
45:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
400:
391:
390:
386:
382:
377:
369:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
346:Mike Christie
342:
341:
340:
339:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
319:Mike Christie
316:
312:
311:
306:
305:
301:
297:
293:
292:
291:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
273:Mike Christie
265:
263:
262:
258:
254:
245:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
217:
214:
210:
209:
203:
201:
200:
196:
192:
186:
180:
175:
171:
167:
154:
152:
151:
147:
143:
137:
131:
126:
122:
118:
105:
103:
102:
95:
93:
92:
91:Babbling Edit
88:
87:
83:
79:
72:
69:
67:
64:
62:
59:
57:
54:
53:
52:
46:
44:
41:
37:
33:
29:
25:
17:
373:
269:
249:
220:
158:
109:
99:
96:Final Choice
89:
75:
50:
22:— Preceding
18:
15:
376:this survey
246:Peer Review
166:talk pages
117:talk pages
78:Kechambers
253:Lcannaday
354:contribs
327:contribs
315:Babbling
296:Babbling
281:contribs
266:Babbling
225:Teahouse
101:Babbling
36:contribs
24:unsigned
358:library
331:library
285:library
219:Hello!
191:SineBot
142:SineBot
174:tildes
125:tildes
28:Lino08
229:Sarah
221:Amf14
385:talk
350:talk
323:talk
277:talk
257:talk
233:talk
195:talk
146:talk
82:talk
32:talk
356:-
329:-
283:-
182:or
133:or
387:)
360:)
352:-
333:)
325:-
287:)
279:-
259:)
235:)
197:)
189:--
148:)
140:--
84:)
38:)
34:•
383:(
348:(
321:(
275:(
255:(
231:(
193:(
144:(
80:(
30:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
