Knowledge

User talk:Aniljjn

Source 📝

27: 53:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
57:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
50: 39: 43: 34: 18: 65: 59: 70: 32:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
51:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Rajshekhar Rajaharia
38:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
8: 7: 40:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 14: 49:The article will be discussed at 25: 1: 86: 71:16:17, 17 June 2011 (UTC) 42:or whether it should be 35:Rajshekhar Rajaharia 19:Rajshekhar Rajaharia 68: 63: 77: 66: 61: 29: 28: 85: 84: 80: 79: 78: 76: 75: 74: 30: 26: 23: 12: 11: 5: 83: 81: 24: 22: 17:Nomination of 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 82: 73: 72: 69: 64: 55: 52: 47: 45: 41: 37: 36: 20: 16: 56: 48: 33: 31: 21:for deletion 44:deleted 62:MALL 67:JIM 58:— 46:. 60:S

Index

Rajshekhar Rajaharia
Rajshekhar Rajaharia
Knowledge's policies and guidelines
deleted
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Rajshekhar Rajaharia
SMALL
JIM
16:17, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.