User talk:Tigris the Majestic

825:

when placing a warning on an editor's talkpage, once is enough. If they delete it, just take it as an indication that they've read it. Most admins will routinely check page history to see what's been posted, so it won't matter if a warning is still on the page or not. Lastly, one more caution, be careful about using the "will be blocked" template, since you're not an admin and can't enforce something like that. Better on repeated warnings is just to leave a note with a diff rather than to escalate the templates. Oh, and to really make yourself look good, think about going to old posts of yours where you may have made personal attacks, and delete anything which may be construed as uncivil. Being willing to change older comments of yours is considered a mark of considerable maturity. --

1325:

don't think the ones you quote (Croce, Smith) support that statement, at least from what I remember. If that is the case, your edits can be seen as POV. If this is not what you are saying, some re-write may be in order. There is no doubt the South saw some advanced times in its post-Roman history, but I think the seed for the North-South divisions were planted far before unification. As I said above, I strongly applaud your attempt to balance the section and I bow to your knowledge on this subject- especially the non-mainstream views- but, as it sits now, it comes across as confrontational.

1289:

but I recall they both stated that the unification did very little, or nothing, to help the south; not (necessarily) that unification ended a prosperous, enlightened era which is what I gather from your edits. Perhaps it is true the House of Savoy was just another exploitative government, in this case for the benefit of the North, but wouldn't you agree the feudalistic land system and exploitation by the foreign courts in Naples had more to do with setting up a divide than Garibaldi, Cavour et al?

360:. To my knowledge there was no such "civilization", though there was definitely a period of Arabo-Norman art and architecture. However, I'll be honest that I'm not that familiar with this particular time period, so could use an expert. Could you please take a look, and advise on the best way to handle cleanup? Should this be merged to something else, or perhaps renamed to something better? We've got some concerns listed at the talkpage, feel free to comment there. Thanks, 1377:. As to the Lombards article, I tried a compromise edit, but you reverted it and added an unreliable 1847 source that you cannot properly interpret. And you haven't even looked at the talk page, where I have posted two comments without response. C'mon! This type of behaviour is unacceptable at Knowledge (XXG). And again, stop politicising disputes! If you continue, people will begin to think that the one with the political motives is you. 1180:

guarantees that no one is going to listen to you. Some won't listen to you because you're rude, some won't read what you say because it's too long, some will be overwhelmed by trying to understand multiple changes at once. So I repeat: Pick a small portion of the article to change, pick good sources to back up your argument, and stay civil. Then if you can get one thing changed, you can move on to other things. Step by step, it

2649: 2447: 953: 1307:

the lower classes of the south by promising the land reforms and then when Sardinian's invasion had been carried out, the promises turned out to be just a trick. Aside from the obvious lack of development, this obviously had an effect of pushing people towards crime. Only the early Italian government can be blamed for the monster they created IMO, because they had the power to decide which way history would turn. Thanks. -

2328: 1638: 2710: 262:

you that editors such as I do not wish for anything other than accuracy and verifiability. And as to the issue of the images: it was not an attack on you or your editing (though I don't think the images add much to their articles), but a simple request that you correct certain errors of fact in the image descriptions. I'd do it myself, but I wouldn't know what the proper descriptions are.

3127: 1741: 2061:

repeat ('echo') it here". In its mere existance, this shows that information on other Wikipedias, ESPECIALLY Featured Articles, should be included in the English wikipedia. By saying that using information (or even basic ideas) from other language Knowledge (XXG) articles in the English article is wrong, you're saying that this entire WikiProject is wrong.

703: 1373:. There is no consensus for a move to "House of Aragon". I oppose it, Sclua opposes it, and John Kenney opposed it. Only you and Enric Naval support it. I have presented copious sources for the "House of Barcelona" usage at the talk page, which you don't even seem to pay the least attention to. You are edit warring and ignoring 772:. They are also not effective communication. If you are trying to persuade editors to adopt a different viewpoint, insulting them is not going to make them listen. Instead, just stick to the sources. If you think someone is wrong, point to a source that backs this up and say, "The article should say <wording: --> 1708:) were taking up 2/3 of my screen, took me quite a while to figure out what was causing it, but it was ignoring the width and height attribute completely. The reason for the problem is most likely recent changes made to the MediaWiki interface. I'm happy to revert if a fix can be found for the giant image problem. 1171:

Choose sources which specifically mention the Rab camp. Stay civil as you are discussing it. I assure you, that if you have a specific, strong, and civil case that is backed up by reliable sources, that other editors will listen to you. If they do not, then there are ways that you can escalate the situation, per

1118:

is just allowed to come in and wholesale revert the whole work, sources, attributions, etc without entering discussion on the page and I'm supposed to pretend he is acting in "good faith". He has proven to be stalking me and general trolling me around Knowledge (XXG), yet he gets no block at all, or even a warning.

2070:

common sense, logic and consensus in not having this section. In addition, it appears as though you have a history of a) going against the consensus of other editors (see History of Islam in southern Italy in your talk page) and b) editing Italian articles to put Italy in a better light (removing and

1324:

The question I put to you is this: "Did unification end an enlightened era of progress and prosperity for the South?" This is what I gather you are saying from your recent edits. If this is indeed what you are saying, you are making a very strong assertion and you need to provide proper references. I

1139:

that don't work at all. All of this was brought up explicitly on the talk as you will see if you look. The fact that the AlasdairGreen27 (with a track record of dispute in regards to Italians) and my admirer Lomis just wholesale reverted that and did not even put these things in-line on their own POV

1070:

Please take this time out to review the various Knowledge (XXG) policies. I think that you have some valid points, but if you are going to participate here, you must present these points in a valid way, and you must be willing to participate in a cooperative and collegial way with other editors. If

256:

Can you be specific about your beefs with the lead? Really, you just throw around terms like "trolling", "blogging", "anti-Neapolitan", "anti-Sicilian", "Islamophilia". You also cleary have a strong dislike of Islam (and maybe Muslims) and its relationship to Italy especially. But I don't necessarily

1480:

In answer to your edit summary, I'd say a different color is needed if the template groupings are to be seen quickly and easily. It only need be slightly but sufficiently different. If you're not keen on the default color -- I'm no particular fan of it -- please suggest an alternative that isn't too

1127:

The article as it is now (the Balkan nationalist POV) aside from it been extremely bias to one point of view, doesn't even have a "POV" tag at the top to highlight its heavily disputed status. Non of its references are properly formated and put in a correct way of attribution, unlike the new version

1117:

I mean what do you expect me to do? I opened a discussion and listened to points made by Direktor . Created a new, more neutral wording on specific fields. Standardised the references for the things I put into the article properly and with full attribution. Yet after such hard work, this troll Lomis

355:

Hiya, could use your expertise if you have some time? We're currently dealing with a POV-pusher who's creating a lot of forks on historical articles. His stuff usually looks good on first glance, but when we dig deeper there are usually profound sourcing issues, and he's actually on track to be put

335:

The terms are both used in English. "Aubergine" is preferred in the UK, while "eggplant" is far more common in other English-speaking countries - and "eggplant" was previously very common in the UK as well. You may be familiar with the UK usage, but in cases where there are two clear variants, the

261:

in a sentence that establishes some context and you insist on an inaccurate "tips of Apulia and Calabria" while insisting on the word "interlude" in an attempt to downplay the significance of the whole thing. Maybe the above editor Charlir91 gave you a bad impression of Wikipedians, but I can assure

3143:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if

2060:

tag: "WikiProject Echo has identified Naples as a foreign language featured article. You may be able to improve this article with information from the Italian or Spanish language Wikipedias.". Wikiproject Echo is dedicated to "find information present in some other Knowledge (XXG) but not here, and

1288:

While I applaud your attempts to make the article's "North-South Divide" section more balanced, I think to throw all of the South's post-unification ills on the shoulders of Garibaldi is a tad overcompensating. It's been a long while since I've read Croce or Dennis Mack Smith, the sources you cite,

1179:

remain civil, because as soon as you resort to name-calling, it completely obscures any other good points that you may have made. And please concentrate on small portions of the article. When you don't, and make sweeping changes, combined with lengthy talkpage posts, and incivility, it pretty much

1170:

specific change that you would like to make to the article. Pick one sentence where you feel that your case is strongest, and is best supported by reliable sources. Make a case for that change on the talkpage. List your proposed wording for that one change, and cite the sources which back it up.

1057:

cease referring to other editors as vandals. The word "vandalism" has a very specific meaning on Knowledge (XXG). It it is for blatant problems such as when someone removes a picture on a page and replaced it with a picture of their genitals, or when they insert profanity, or totally blank a page

315:

Do you know of any good histories of the Kingdom of Naples under the Angevins (say 1262 or 1285 to 1435)? I'd like to improve some of the articles on Joan I, Charles of Durazzo, and various other Tarantini & Durazzeschi, but I've never found a good book in English on the kinstrife and civil war

213:

Your view has been opposed by three editors (incl. myself) and no other editor has come to support you. You have no justification, therefore, for going ahead with your proposed merger. Any more of this "redirecting" without engaging in discussion to generate consensus and I will have to report this

2538:

While noting that you didn't actually ask for your block to be lifted when it was in force, I also note that you had changed the lead of this article back to your own version, pretty much against consensus. That is unacceptable. You are supposed to work with other editors. If you can't sort it out

1306:

I think the unification was for the benefit of two types of people, 1) the North-west Italians, 2) the few Southerners who owned vast land properties. Certainly a lot of the blame can be laid at the door of the likes of Cavour and the people who created the Italian government, because they lied to

144:

Excuse me, but is this like your period? Is this so important to you that you just have to have it your way? If that's the case, then why? Why is it so important to that this site isn't named "Charles Luciano"? Is your name "Charles Luciano"? Is that why you want the site named "Lucky", instead of

824:

Okay, I'm taking a look at things. Thank you for being more civil, but please be very careful to not make any kinds of personal attacks. When at an article talkpage, for best results, try not to talk about the other editor at all, just stick strictly to discussing the article's content. Also,

804:

I'm noticing that in nearly ALL the articles you tackled, you also created mess, clashes, gave into personal attacks, repeatedly deleted others' respectable work etc, without caring at all if not about your opinion. I strongly suggest you to check Knowledge (XXG) pages about behaviour here. Good

2030:

Who is to say that the Spanish and Italian encyclopedias have lower, and not higher standards? Regardless, who is to say that you get to choose what is recentism and what is not? Myself and five other users have commented in support of this issue having its own section, and you are the only one

1215:, but I think you placed some of your own POV in it. I think you also reworded sentences without regards for the citations on them and you added a citation about landfills to a long sentence about anti-fascism, the USA, leftist parties, and organised crime! The article now needs to be checked. 1980:), I replaced the old Waste Management Issues text that you had moved to the talk page. I am undoing your edit, because I feel that if it is mentionned in both these articles, it is not recentism and deserves mention. If you want to take it off again, explain your rationale in the talk page. 582:, could you please engage at the talkpage? I'm trying to follow along, but some clear and civil comments from you at the talkpage would be preferable to some of the edit summaries that I've been seeing recently. :/ Can you please try to ratchet the civility up a notch? Thanks, 1681:

Gennarous, we had a RfC on the talk page about the infobox. The creator of the infobox himself commented on it and told us that his infobox was inadequate for this article and that it was not designed for this type of entity. I finally agreed that the infobox could be taken out.

117:

There is no way that I can allow that to happen. You're right, his name is really Salvatore Lucania, but you can not name the article "Lucky Luciano" just because you feel that sounds better. That article is named "Charles Luciano", NOT LUCKY LUCIANO! DO YOU UNDERSTAND??????

2151:. If it is so, then it is not correct about rebetiko music. For the lack of another term I use "urban" or "urban-folk" and "popular"(I know they are not the best terms...) but its the translation of the Greek term (αστικό λαϊκό τραγούδι) just to separate it from folk music. 2078:

That being said, the only thing I can really do is suggest that next time you revert an edit, such as my first re-introduction of the section, is write in the talk page why (in addition to recentism, mention the fact that other Wikipedias should not be used as guidelines).

2609:

2) NPOV requires all majority and some minority views be covered in the entry in a proper balance. All the current editors have shown a willingness to discuss their different POVs and seek a consensus before making substantial edits. Please join us in this collaborative

2985:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 3108:. The link given makes no mention of the source of the photo, and it looks modern to me. I have placed a disputed copyright tag on the image. If you can show that it is indeed a contemporary portrait as claimed, I will very happily withdraw my doubts. Thank you! 1103:

To call the wholesale reverts of these new, fully explained, heavily sourced pieces of information which were trollishly removed first by Lomis (who admits knows abosoutely nothing about the subject at hand, and is clearly just there to antagonise in violation of

1093:

is not a revert, it was adding new wording and new information, with new specifically attributed references, explained on the talk beforehand such as International Herald Tribute, a source from the BBC, a source from the Guardian (about the Italian President's

1652:

because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Knowledge (XXG) (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its

2635:, I find your addition of Figures section controversial. Among scholars there is no consensus about proper usage of the "fascist" label. Mussolini, Gentile and to same extent Hitler are uncontroversial, but there is no clear consensus about the rest of them. 2274:

I have now protected the page for 72 hours to give you and other editors an opportunity to discuss your changes and other proposals on its talk page. Please take advantage of this opportunity and bear in mind the advice I gave you less than a month ago.

2015:

In addition, there is a specific article for "Waste Management Issues" in each of these languages, in addition to the section in the Naples article. Thus, regardless of whether or not there is a separate article or not, it should be mentionned here.

2339:

prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the

428:, while the Prince de Ligne de La Trémoille is the heir-general of Anna, another daughter of Amadeus. The birth order of Anna and Maria is not known with certainty, so either one could be the rightful heir to Cyprus, Jerusalem & Armenia. 2202:

Well, I see you moved it back without making any attempt at discussion, and without addressing my issues with your original move. Care to discuss it NOW then, on the talk page? Or else I'm just going to have to get further input on this...

1344:

of the previous views, to balance the article somewhat and because they come with reputable, scholarly references. I think both sides are now well represented and readers can understand both points of view. Hopefully you will agree.

765:, I strongly recommend that you try to focus strictly on the article and not on Srnec. Using phrases such as "You're really trying to stretch", "ignorantly trying", and "Srnec wants to Islamise southern Italy with misinformation" 174:

Oh my, did I hit a soft spot there? Why would you bring up the "Emo"-thing? I haven't said anything about any emos, but maybe you're an emo. Maybe your personal opinion do have an effect on this article. I mean, maybe you're

741:

This was in reference to your above post about Newkai. If you disagree with what he is writing, you can of course change it, but it is not appropriate to refer to him as an "ignorant human being", as that is a violation of

237:

attacks and the hyperbole to yourself. They serve no purpose. Another editor has reverted your redirects now. I told you to stop. Until you have support, you have no business redirecting articles (i.e. deleting content).

2172:

Hi, You effectively turned this from one template into another. I was wondering why you did this. (Also note you left the template at the bottom of the Ostrogothic Kings' articles, which it obviously shouldn't be now) -

292:

later. They may very well be public domain, but you have to change the image descriptions. Further, the image of Charles II of Naples is of a tomb effigy. It is not a painting. Can you correct the image descriptions?

681:

is one of the most ignorant human beings I have ever read the words of, despite it would seem many people trying to enlighten him. I'll go through the move ways which you said to get this fixed, WP:RM. Thanks. -

3038:. Long ago I tried to make the article more neutral. If you want to make more changes, you are free to do it! In particular, if you have any sources supporting what you wrote there, put them in the article! -- 1784: 2031:

contesting it. Everything, other than your allegations of recentism, supports having this section on the main page. To fix your recentism problem, why not add it and have the ((Recentism)) tag applied?

498:

The last time I saw the article on Naples it was a sorry mess. I was delighted to see that it is now a well organised and referenced piece, it appears mostly due to your efforts. Keep up the good work!

2981:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2606:

1) "This is a controversial topic that may be under dispute. Please read this page and discuss substantial changes here before making them." That is on top of the discussion page for a reason.

1820:

website and does not appear to be an original portrait, but a more magnified recreation of his most famous. The Naxos website instructs that licensing inquiries should be made before using it.

873:

Please note that my caution extends to all articles, not just the Rab article. For example, at about the same time as I posted the above message, you made this edit, with an edit summary of

2066:

Anyway, I'm not going to continue this argument, as it's late here, and I'm too new at Knowledge (XXG) to get into an argument like this. However, I still believe that you are going against

2475:

and I've now warned you twice, and that's without other warnings. Please discuss this article with other editors when your block expires otherwise your next block is likely to be your last.

1887:

are edit-warring over this article; I don't propose to get involved in that unless either of you breaks policy, but certainly you have already done that by calling him a "troll". This is

2121:, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Knowledge (XXG). 1108:). And then by AlasdairGreen27 who as his talk shows, has had numerous clashes with various users over his strong anti-Italian stance and nationalist stance in regards to such articles. 2425:

and I am pretty sure you will be blocked. Consensus on talk pages must be followed on wikipedia, no matter how strongly you think your arguments are over-riding all other debate. -

1775:(you may view images you have previously uploaded by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box). Please note that 857:

stop the personal comments about other editors. If this happens again, there will be further consequences, up to and including a block. Please do not make this necessary. --

3053: 719: 474:

Agreed. Gennarous, the edit was fine, but calling an anon "commie troll" in an edit summary, was uncalled for. Please try to avoid this kind of language in the future. --

177:*^cked up, I don't know. All that I do know is that you have no idea what you're talking about. Proffessional opinions, my ass... But hey, who don't you go kill yourself? 336:

policy is to go with the original usage on WP, and the page was created under "eggplant" in 2002. I don't know why you insist that "aubergine" is the only correct usage.

1511:

Update: Following a suggestion on the template's talkpage, I've now set the background color to white. If you're unhappy about this color too, please join the discussion

2217:

While I'm not completely proud of this, I just moved it back and reverted, and made it that you can't move it again to the same title. Now you HAVE to discuss things -

1436:

Since most navboxes use a color very similar to #CECFFF as their titlebar background, it's now difficult to distinguish between them and {{Template group}}'s headings.

2750: 3217: 774:. This will be much stronger than you offering what appear to be personal opinions that are not backed up by sources. You say "actual scholar" but you don't say 214:

as an "incident" to an administrator. I'd be happy to hear further reasons for a merger, but you have not responded to either my own or Pippu's latest points at

3212:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

2975: 2931:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

3147:

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created

643:

How can a move putting a world power which is mentioned in the bible, at its correct location be "controversial"? This is a most simple and obvious move. -

1917: 1771:. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see 1932:, but your conduct will also be examined. Meanwhile the page is protected to give me time to examine this in more detail. I will not be railroaded. -- 3082: 2982: 2745: 1211:

Elonka's advice to avoid major edits to large articles all at once. Such edits are hard to follow and dissect. You correctly uprooted some bad POV at

37: 3180: 3176: 3160: 3156: 2986: 1772: 1154:

Gennarous, first, you must stop referring to other editors as trolls. What the other editors are doing is neither trolling nor vandalism. Now, it

762: 2388:, in which "Flag of Europe" was determined to be the proper title for the article. As such, I've reverted your move. Thanks and happy editing! -- 2304: 1166:, but edit-warring about it is still not the way to address those issues. It is my recommendation that you choose this time to think hard about 1022:

persisted in incivility, such as referring to other editors' good faith changes as "vandalism". When you return, it is essential that you must:

988:

Gennarous, I am really sorry to have to take this step, but I am blocking your account access for 24 hours since you violated Knowledge (XXG)'s

257:

have a positive view of the whole thing myself, I just want to report facts. My problems with your lead are this: you removed a useful link to

3184: 2990: 2916: 2125: 625:

Please do not cut and paste content to move articles. This move is controversial as it has been discussed extensively in the past. Please use

2795:

I have read through the five pillars and would like to request an unblock now please. I will comment on the content and not on the editor. -

2628:

policy. If you continue with edit summaries in which you call Cberlet troll and vandal you will probably find yourself blocked from editing.

1140:

version proves such edits are in no way "good faith" and are not in the interests of making the article either A) presentable, B) neutral. -

93: 2821:

and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the

2114: 2001:

Do you not think that if it is mentionned in a Featured article and the native language's article, it is relevant and should be mentionned?

1705: 2825:. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Knowledge (XXG). You can do this by: 1243:

Gennarous, just one point, if I may. Twice now you have said that I inserted a mirror image of Knowledge (XXG) as a reference. Once here

3191: 2520:

and intentionally holding the article back. How can you justify the removal of 50 citations? I will be taking this higher in regards to

2258:

It does seem disruptive to disregard discussions already in progress, and I suggest you join those discussions or risk being blocked. --

2118: 2106: 337: 2970:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge (XXG) constitutes fair use. Please go to

1128:

I produced. AlasdairGreen27 seems to think using a mirror page of Knowledge (XXG) itself is acceptable for a source on Knowledge (XXG)

1030:

way of imposing changes. If you feel that you have a point, bring it up at talk, support your views with reliable sources, and build

579: 207: 3209: 2512:

Your block is outrageous, look on the talkpage and see that I have entered the discussion as you suggest. Also I suggest you look at

2764: 2589: 2543:. Meanwhile, further disruptive editing will undoubtedly lead to longer blocks. It's not as if you are unaware of the rules here. -- 2110: 284:

The images you uploaded of Williams I, II, and III of Sicily, Roger I of Sicily, Conrad IV of Germany, and Ladislaus of Naples are

3135: 1950:

You two are beginning to push my patience. If you don't stop edit-warring, whatever the venue, I am going to block both of you. --

2938:

I'm sorry but absoutely nowhere do I have a history of vandalism, I got blocked from commenting on an editor not the content. -

2625: 714:, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to 707: 59: 1599: 1538: 192: 160: 133: 2830: 2357: 2243:

without discussing it first on the talk page. Bobisbob, Vision_Thing, R-41, Mamalujo, and I are trying to find a compromise.--

1649: 1246:

and once in your post above. I replied to you at the article talk page (15 hours ago now) pointing out that you were mistaken

1026:

Discuss controversial changes at talk, rather than trying to impose them by edit-warring. Please be clear: Edit-warring is a

54: 3188: 2166: 402: 3013: 2685: 2486: 2341: 2336: 1734: 978: 2674:. This is unacceptable, especially as you have been warned less than 24 hours ago. "Comment on content, not other editors". 1858:

Yes, Gennarous, care to explain? Following me around and reverting me without a thought, even when I'm removing vandalism?

881:. Again, I am not commenting on the content of the article, but I am going to be quite insistent that your edit summaries 3168: 2822: 2524:'s intentional holding back of the article and if you have not issued an apology, you will be mentioned in the report. - 2147:

hello. I saw your edit in the article! I am not familiar with the term root music. I see that it prompts to the article

2057: 1776: 2582: 2364: 1512: 1250: 1191: 1132: 1078: 912:

I've seen that you are interested in the history of the Crown of Aragon. I'd be pleased if you could improve this page:

896: 864: 832: 785: 753: 732: 589: 481: 383: 367: 3144:

the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

2855:

Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this:

2840: 2723: 2665: 2656: 2463: 2454: 2347: 1972:

Based on the fact that the "Waste Management Issues" of Naples are extensively elaborated upon in the Italian article (

966: 961: 715: 64: 3213: 3205: 1780: 1340:

I just completed some edits to the article: As it sits now, I haven't removed any of your additions- but I added back

1071:

you think that someone is pushing an agenda, there are ways to deal with that, but edit-warring is not one of them. --

2717: 556:

Could you load on commons all those images representing neapolitan provinces' coats of arms please? Thanks and bye --

2880:

If we are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Knowledge (XXG) as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

1058:

and replace it with "I LOVE CARROTS". Those examples are vandalism. But simply disagreeing on article content, is

2722:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

2393: 1825: 2874: 2867: 2603:

You obviously are quite well read and skilled on this topic, but two Knowledge (XXG) policies need to be applied.

3090: 2133: 1265: 913: 906: 464: 425: 357: 2971: 2962: 2954: 2677: 2478: 2352:. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a 974: 44: 33: 3057: 2728: 2632: 1654: 1645: 3052:

Hello, Tigris the Majestic. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at

1977: 845:

Gennarous, I can see that you are trying to do better, civility-wise, but this comment by you was not helpful.

71: 458:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Multiculturalism&curid=51885&diff=199328313&oldid=199253533

316:

that wracked the Kingdom after the death of Robert. Any recommendations you could make would be appreciated.

2698: 2549: 2499: 2281: 2264: 1956: 1938: 1905: 1611: 1603: 1520: 1500: 1456: 1418: 341: 3164: 1821: 180: 148: 121: 75: 2639: 1848: 1709: 1623: 1607: 1595: 1577: 993: 850: 847:"I will partake in Elonka's advise by not calling the athiest people here the "C" word or the "B N" words. 460: 215: 3105: 2818: 2415: 2353: 2047: 1031: 970: 87: 79: 2389: 2312: 1723: 1690: 1615: 1591: 1587: 1407: 3139:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 2967: 2332: 853:. I sympathize greatly with the emotional reactions caused by this subject. But let me be clear, you 49: 2303:

recently, you will probably be interested on checking the RFC on one of the editors there. Please see

1475:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Template%3ATemplate_group&diff=207331421&oldid=207312668

1430:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Template%3ATemplate_group&diff=207089049&oldid=204655456

931:

I'll have a look and see, but I'm about to improve the article on Aragonese monarchs first. Cheers! -

3086: 2129: 1748: 1546: 1370: 1261: 2109:. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Knowledge (XXG) uses a set of 1136: 661:

1) See the voluminous talk page discussions 2) Please don't ever cut and paste to implement a move.

184: 152: 125: 2943: 2800: 2529: 2429: 2385: 1663: 1491:'s default #ccf, #ddf, #eef and lavender colors. If you're not already aware of it, you might find 1312: 1145: 936: 687: 677:

OK, after reading the archives as suggested, it would seem that the article is where it is because

648: 521: 188: 156: 129: 2611: 2244: 1929: 1063: 606:'s good. Thanks for your help. I want to thank you also for your last uploading on commos. BYE. -- 3066: 3035: 2693: 2544: 2494: 2361: 2276: 2259: 2084: 2036: 2021: 2006: 1985: 1951: 1933: 1921: 1900: 1884: 1818: 1760: 1516: 1496: 1452: 1445:

parameter to {{Template group}} so a color such as #CECFFF can be set where this isn't a problem.

810: 414: 103: 40:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 1888: 1768: 1105: 886: 769: 449: 1973: 86:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 3225: 3113: 2998: 2636: 2615: 2248: 2222: 2208: 2193: 2178: 2156: 2148: 1844: 1752: 1619: 1573: 1034:

for your changes. If you feel that other editors are not adequately listening to you, file a

921: 666: 634: 3056:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic

1163: 3043: 3021: 2925: 2408: 2384:

article to a different title. You probably missed the discussion on the article's talk page

2367: 2308: 1719: 1686: 1403: 1350: 1330: 1294: 1188: 1075: 893: 861: 829: 782: 750: 729: 586: 542: 504: 478: 433: 380: 376:

Thanks for the quick reply. :) Do you see anything in the article that's worth merging? --

364: 321: 2577: 2573: 2517: 2469: 2422: 1925: 1129: 1039: 1035: 989: 743: 453: 2889: 2648: 2446: 2300: 1863: 1675: 1569: 1554: 1485: 1393: 1382: 1220: 952: 611: 561: 298: 267: 243: 223: 2572:

you called another editor "blatant trolling by notorious vandal" which is a violation of

2540: 2113:

to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

1896: 1892: 1374: 1172: 1043: 626: 1787:

spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!--

1256:. Since I am sure that you have read both of my posts regarding this, I would therefore 2939: 2897: 2796: 2525: 2426: 2404: 2381: 2072: 1998:

Hopefully we can sort this out and come to a consensus before getting into an edit war.

1685:

I'll just use the research we made on the infobox to improve the body of the article --

1658: 1308: 1282: 1212: 1141: 932: 878: 683: 644: 517: 258: 2327: 1637: 1159: 1089:

Elonka, please read the changes and the talk. What you're requesting me to do, I did.

778:

scholar. If you can be more specific, I think it would strengthen your arguments. --

17: 3061: 2124:

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on

2080: 2032: 2017: 2002: 1981: 1803: 1800: 1797: 1794: 1791: 1788: 1747:

Thank you for uploading images/media to Knowledge (XXG)! There is, however, another

1704:

The reason I did this was that images in at least 5 articles using it (as an example

1542: 1366: 806: 534: 410: 99: 3229: 3194: 3116: 3094: 3071: 3047: 3024: 3002: 2947: 2906: 2804: 2703: 2642: 2619: 2593: 2554: 2533: 2504: 2432: 2397: 2370: 2316: 2286: 2269: 2252: 2226: 2212: 2197: 2182: 2160: 2137: 2088: 2040: 2025: 2010: 1989: 1961: 1943: 1910: 1867: 1852: 1829: 1727: 1712: 1694: 1668: 1627: 1581: 1558: 1524: 1504: 1460: 1411: 1386: 1354: 1334: 1316: 1298: 1269: 1224: 1194: 1149: 1081: 940: 925: 899: 867: 835: 814: 788: 756: 735: 691: 669: 652: 637: 615: 592: 565: 546: 525: 508: 484: 468: 437: 418: 386: 370: 345: 325: 302: 271: 247: 227: 196: 164: 137: 107: 3221: 3109: 2994: 2218: 2204: 2189: 2174: 2152: 1899:. If this continues, I will fully protect the page until the matter is resolved. -- 1891:. If you can't sort out a content dispute between yourselves, I suggest you seek a 1756: 917: 662: 630: 603: 1764: 1537:

You need to pay more attention to talk pages instead of constantly reverting: see

746:. I would recommend that you consider refactoring or deleting the post, thanks. -- 3153:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

3081:

Hi Tigris/Gennarous, there's a new thread at AN which directly concerns you. See

3183:. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the 3126: 3039: 3017: 2521: 1568:

I 'ld appreciate an explanation for the recent revert of my changes to Sicily's

1346: 1326: 1290: 1185: 1072: 890: 858: 826: 779: 747: 726: 678: 583: 538: 500: 475: 429: 377: 361: 317: 3016:) I figured I should let you know: I don't mean to blindside you with this. - 1859: 1550: 1492: 1378: 1216: 607: 557: 409:. And the House of Urach, in turn, have a claim for the Jerusalem Kingdom. -- 294: 263: 239: 219: 2852:

on that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.

1402:. Do you agree to this solution as a consensus to avoid further edit wars? -- 3140: 1763:

and uploading your media there instead. That way, all of the other language

2870:

improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article.

2684:

after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may

2485:

after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may

3104:

Hi. I noticed you (or the user whose talk page redirects here) uploaded

1920:

it would seem that consensus is against you. If you feel strongly about

1815: 1249:

requesting that you corrected your error. I also made the same point to

702: 2966:. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under 2472: 2439: 2240: 2101:

License tagging for Image:Fra Diavolo & Bands of the Holy Faith.jpg

1740: 1618:

etc i.e. in chronological order, which is more "reader-friendly" -IMO.

2886:

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "

406: 3173:

the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:45, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

3122:

File source problem with File:Xerxes I, the Great, King of Persia.jpg

2817:

This request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of

1877: 1718:

You probably need to remove the "px" part from the size attributes --

1451:

parameter you can use, so have reverted your edit. Hope that's okay.

3083:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators'_noticeboard#User:Tigris_the_Majestic

2873:

When are you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an

773:

because that's how it's interpreted in <name author's work: -->

83: 2516:

especially under the "Italian Fascism" section, he is violating

356:

on an editing restriction at ArbCom. Anyway, today he created

90:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place 3125: 2708: 2647: 2445: 1739: 1657:, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 1636: 951: 3220:

if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

1046:

page which can be tried. Please note that edit-warring is

3014:

Knowledge (XXG):Wikiquette alerts#"Hoxharian propagandist"

113:

When Americans dont monitor their children on the internet

98:

before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -

2913:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

2053:

what specifically in the Manual of Style relates to this?

2933:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2839:

If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see

3148: 2778: 2774: 2768: 2759: 2755: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2671: 2569: 2513: 1995:

Just got your message; don't know how to reply back....

1843:

act of childish vandalism was made using your account?

1840: 1474: 1429: 1400: 1397: 1254: 1247: 1244: 1090: 1020: 1017: 1015: 1013: 1011: 1009: 1006: 1003: 1001: 999: 997: 874: 846: 766: 723: 457: 398: 1586:

I think it's preferable to follow what is applied in

977:. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may 2716:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

2989:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 2836:Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve. 2107:

Image:Fra Diavolo & Bands of the Holy Faith.jpg

1633:

233:Happy to engage in discussion, but please keep the 3216:. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at 3012:Since I've had occasion to protest your behavior ( 424:Patrick is the heir-general of Maria, daughter of 973:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 535:Talk:Italians#Appearance vote - to close 03/26/08 218:. Again, this is unacceptable and you must stop. 1976:) and the (currently Featured) Spanish article ( 1175:. But to have the strongest possible case, you 1005:You have already been warned about edit-warring. 1783:, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. 1399:, summarized more concisely on my next comment 1260:ask you not to make such an allegation again. 722:and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. 2239:Gennarous, please stop rewriting the lead for 145:"Charles"? Don't you have a job? GET A LIFE! 407:Marie Gabriele (or Marie-Gabrielle) von Urach 8: 3136:File:Xerxes I, the Great, King of Persia.jpg 1978:es:Nápoles#Camorra y degradaci.C3.B3n urbana 1773:Knowledge (XXG):Moving images to the Commons 1135:telling him it can't. As well as there been 849:I know you feel strongly about the topic at 3200:Possibly unfree File:Engelbert Dollfuss.jpg 2050:is specifically stated as NOT being policy. 2841:this index of articles needing improvement 2305:Knowledge (XXG):Requests_for_comment/Sclua 70:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 2331:You currently appear to be engaged in an 2126:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions 2960:Thanks for uploading or contributing to 2071:downplaying negative points, such as in 761:Gennarous, regarding your commentary at 2411:(both of which have names agreed to by 2380:Hello! I notice you recently moved the 763:Talk:History of Islam in southern Italy 403:Patrick Desmond Carl-Alexander Guinness 308:English-language histories of the Regno 1883:It has come to my notice that you and 1767:can use them too, as well as our many 1759:media. In the future, please consider 3210:Knowledge (XXG):Possibly unfree files 3204:A file that you uploaded or altered, 3034:I noticed only today your comment in 2670:Personal attacks on other editors as 2624:Please be aware of Knowledge (XXG)'s 2576:. This is a reminder that you review 2128:. Thank you for your cooperation. -- 1817:you've uploaded originates from Naxos 1755:, a central media repository for all 533:Have you had the chance to check out 7: 2356:among editors. If necessary, pursue 1706:John Douglas (Queensland politician) 1008:You also, despite repeated warnings, 401:. I suppose, it wouldn't be a joke: 288:medieval depictions. They come from 1974:it:Napoli#Problemi della citt.C3.A0 1779:content, such as images claimed as 45:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 2894:" to your talk page. Thank you. — 2866:Propose some significant and well 1650:Knowledge (XXG):Copyright problems 1438:Okay, then, if I revert your edit? 580:History of Islam in southern Italy 208:History of Islam in southern Italy 36:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for 25: 2877:will review your proposed edits. 2676:. Please stop. You're welcome to 2666:Knowledge (XXG)'s blocking policy 2477:. Please stop. You're welcome to 2464:Knowledge (XXG)'s blocking policy 2307:and feel free to comment there -- 1447:Just realized there already is a 1042:. There are also other steps at 967:Knowledge (XXG)'s blocking policy 578:Hiya, instead of edit-warring at 2326: 2058:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Echo 965:from editing in accordance with 701: 456:as you did in this edit summary 32:Hello, Tigris the Majestic, and 1814:The Domenico Scarlatti portrait 1539:Talk:List of Navarrese monarchs 975:make constructive contributions 3185:Media copyright questions page 3072:18:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 3048:15:37, 19 September 2008 (UTC) 2991:Media copyright questions page 2167:Template:Kings of the Lombards 1968:Naples Waste Management Issues 1928:, I suggest you report him at 405:is the eldest son of Princess 1: 2688:by adding the text {{unblock| 2660:from editing for a period of 2539:between you, there is always 2489:by adding the text {{unblock| 2458:from editing for a period of 1050:one of the recommended steps. 981:by adding the text {{unblock| 706:Please see Knowledge (XXG)'s 108:21:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 3195:06:45, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 3157:criteria for speedy deletion 3095:06:40, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 2987:criteria for speedy deletion 2829:Familiarizing yourself with 2295:RFC on the conduct of a user 1644:An image that you uploaded, 1251:User:Otolemur crassicaudatus 1133:User:Otolemur crassicaudatus 448:Please remember to maintain 197:18:20, 19 January 2008 (UTC) 165:15:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC) 138:14:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC) 60:How to write a great article 3206:File:Engelbert Dollfuss.jpg 2963:Image:MIS Official Logo.jpg 2955:Image:MIS Official Logo.jpg 2720:, who declined the request. 2188:Well I had it moved back - 971:abuse of editing privileges 516:Thanks for the comment. :) 3245: 2972:the image description page 1669:18:25, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 1646:Image:AncientPhonecian.jpg 1628:08:03, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 1582:19:38, 26 April 2008 (UTC) 1559:17:24, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 1525:10:30, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 1505:13:24, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 1461:07:55, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 1412:19:14, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 1387:03:12, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 1355:18:30, 21 April 2008 (UTC) 1335:18:44, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1317:16:34, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1299:18:50, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 1270:07:25, 11 April 2008 (UTC) 1225:04:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC) 1195:02:12, 11 April 2008 (UTC) 1150:22:26, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 1082:21:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 1053:Also when you return, you 941:19:38, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 926:17:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 900:07:21, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 868:07:04, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 547:23:18, 26 March 2008 (UTC) 526:11:09, 26 March 2008 (UTC) 509:03:42, 26 March 2008 (UTC) 485:16:03, 19 March 2008 (UTC) 469:12:47, 19 March 2008 (UTC) 438:21:34, 11 March 2008 (UTC) 419:14:14, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 387:09:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 371:08:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 3230:21:42, 9 April 2012 (UTC) 3025:05:40, 31 July 2008 (UTC) 3003:01:23, 22 July 2008 (UTC) 2974:and edit it to include a 2948:09:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 2917:guide to appealing blocks 2907:08:48, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 2823:Knowledge (XXG) community 2805:05:50, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 2704:02:36, 15 July 2008 (UTC) 2643:19:08, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 2620:12:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 2594:03:27, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 2555:12:02, 13 July 2008 (UTC) 2534:04:43, 13 July 2008 (UTC) 2514:what Chip Berlet reverted 2505:22:35, 11 July 2008 (UTC) 2403:If you don't stop moving 2183:11:34, 27 June 2008 (UTC) 2161:09:42, 24 June 2008 (UTC) 2138:04:13, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 2089:03:49, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 2048:Knowledge (XXG):Recentism 2041:03:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 2026:03:01, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 2011:02:59, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 1990:02:52, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 1962:20:30, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 1944:20:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 1911:19:47, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 1868:21:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC) 1853:22:43, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 1806:10:37, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 914:Coat of arms of Catalonia 907:Coat of arms of Catalonia 836:21:23, 9 April 2008 (UTC) 815:09:10, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 789:04:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 757:00:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 736:00:36, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 692:18:05, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 670:17:46, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 653:17:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 638:17:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 616:12:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 593:12:21, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 566:11:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC) 426:Amadeus IX, Duke of Savoy 358:Arabo-Norman civilization 346:08:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC) 326:03:17, 7 March 2008 (UTC) 303:23:17, 6 March 2008 (UTC) 272:00:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC) 248:20:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 228:03:54, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 88:Knowledge (XXG):Questions 3133:Thank you for uploading 3058:User:Tigris the Majestic 2633:Template:Fascism sidebar 2631:Concerning you edits on 2433:22:11, 9 July 2008 (UTC) 2398:17:27, 9 July 2008 (UTC) 2371:16:04, 9 July 2008 (UTC) 2317:17:57, 5 July 2008 (UTC) 2287:16:04, 5 July 2008 (UTC) 2270:12:05, 5 July 2008 (UTC) 2253:21:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 2227:22:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 2213:22:30, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 2198:12:38, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 1830:07:50, 7 June 2008 (UTC) 1572:. Thank you in advance. 3117:21:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 2953:Fair use rationale for 2584:Otolemur crassicaudatus 2565:Personal attack warning 1728:15:17, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 1713:00:01, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 1695:23:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 1419:Template:Template group 1019:and even an ANI thread, 718:for disruption. Please 3155:per Knowledge (XXG)'s 3130: 2863:before you improve it. 2713: 2652: 2450: 2421:), I'll report you on 1744: 1641: 1044:the Dispute Resolution 1028:completely ineffective 994:Rab concentration camp 956: 851:Rab concentration camp 598:Two Sicilies & co. 216:Talk:Emirate of Sicily 18:User talk:Animagentile 3214:file description page 3208:, has been listed at 3129: 2892:|your question here}} 2765:change block settings 2712: 2651: 2449: 2105:Thanks for uploading 1916:On the basis of this 1743: 1648:, has been listed at 1640: 1441:I could try adding a 1396:to split the article 1392:I made a proposal on 1253:at his/her talk page 955: 875:"garbage revisionism" 2570:In this edit summary 2111:image copyright tags 1749:Wikimedia Foundation 1547:Talk:Robert Guiscard 1371:Talk:House of Aragon 552:Neapolitan provinces 3106:File:DScarlatti.jpg 2729:Tigris the Majestic 2664:in accordance with 2626:no personal attacks 2462:in accordance with 2344:. If you continue, 1897:disupute resolution 1761:creating an account 1258:politely but firmly 1036:Request for comment 710:policy. Comment on 708:no personal attacks 3163:. If the image is 3149:in your upload log 3131: 3036:Talk:Social Action 2976:fair use rationale 2714: 2686:contest this block 2653: 2541:dispute resolution 2487:contest this block 2451: 2358:dispute resolution 1839:Did you know that 1810:Domenico Scarlatti 1745: 1642: 1158:be a violation of 957: 877:at the article on 768:are violations of 393:Kings of Jerusalem 351:Request for review 331:Eggplant/aubergine 55:How to edit a page 38:your contributions 2905: 2857:= Article title = 2342:three-revert rule 2337:three-revert rule 2299:Since you edited 2149:Traditional music 1753:Wikimedia Commons 1735:Wikimedia Commons 1477: 1432: 979:contest the block 199: 183:comment added by 167: 151:comment added by 140: 124:comment added by 78:your messages on 16:(Redirected from 3236: 2983:my contributions 2930: 2924: 2904: 2902: 2895: 2858: 2784: 2782: 2771: 2753: 2751:deleted contribs 2711: 2701: 2696: 2690:your reason here 2585: 2552: 2547: 2502: 2497: 2491:your reason here 2409:Anthem of Europe 2390:Hemlock Martinis 2335:. Note that the 2330: 2284: 2279: 2267: 2262: 1959: 1954: 1941: 1936: 1908: 1903: 1822:Sicilianmandolin 1666: 1661: 1490: 1484: 1473: 1428: 1375:reliable sources 1184:possible. :) -- 1062:vandalism. See 983:your reason here 889:from now on. -- 705: 697:Personal attacks 629:for such moves. 454:personal attacks 178: 146: 119: 97: 80:discussion pages 21: 3244: 3243: 3239: 3238: 3237: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3202: 3177:speedy deletion 3124: 3102: 3100:Scarlatti image 3087:AlasdairGreen27 3085:. Many thanks, 3079: 3060:. Thank you. 3032: 3010: 2958: 2936: 2928: 2922: 2921:, then use the 2910: 2898: 2896: 2856: 2831:our basic rules 2808: 2772: 2762: 2748: 2731: 2724:blocking policy 2709: 2706: 2699: 2694: 2601: 2583: 2567: 2550: 2545: 2507: 2500: 2495: 2443: 2378: 2324: 2301:Crown_of_Aragon 2297: 2282: 2277: 2265: 2260: 2237: 2170: 2145: 2130:ImageTaggingBot 2103: 1970: 1957: 1952: 1939: 1934: 1906: 1901: 1881: 1837: 1812: 1769:sister projects 1751:project called 1738: 1702: 1679: 1676:Crown of Aragon 1664: 1659: 1635: 1600:North Macedonia 1566: 1564:Sicily template 1535: 1488: 1482: 1446: 1439: 1422: 1394:House of Aragon 1363: 1286: 1262:AlasdairGreen27 986: 949: 910: 843: 822: 802: 699: 623: 600: 576: 554: 496: 461:TheRedPenOfDoom 446: 395: 353: 333: 310: 282: 211: 115: 91: 65:Manual of Style 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 3242: 3240: 3218:the discussion 3201: 3198: 3123: 3120: 3101: 3098: 3078: 3075: 3031: 3028: 3009: 3006: 2957: 2951: 2911: 2893: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2871: 2864: 2853: 2851: 2850:edit this page 2846: 2845: 2844: 2834: 2815: 2811:Decline reason 2793: 2789:Request reason 2786: 2707: 2654:You have been 2646: 2600: 2597: 2566: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2452:You have been 2444: 2442: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2405:Flag of Europe 2382:Flag of Europe 2377: 2376:Flag of Europe 2374: 2323: 2320: 2296: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2236: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2215: 2169: 2164: 2144: 2141: 2102: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2076: 2073:Southern Italy 2064: 2063: 2062: 2054: 2051: 1999: 1996: 1969: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1947: 1946: 1880: 1875: 1873: 1871: 1870: 1836: 1833: 1811: 1808: 1737: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1701: 1698: 1678: 1672: 1634: 1631: 1565: 1562: 1534: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1508: 1507: 1478: 1470: 1469: 1440: 1437: 1434: 1433: 1421: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1362: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1285: 1283:Southern Italy 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1213:Southern Italy 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1068: 1067: 1051: 958:You have been 950: 948: 945: 944: 943: 909: 904: 903: 902: 879:Southern Italy 842: 839: 821: 818: 801: 800:Wiki behaviour 798: 796: 794: 793: 792: 791: 698: 695: 675: 674: 673: 672: 656: 655: 622: 619: 599: 596: 575: 572: 570: 553: 550: 531: 530: 529: 528: 495: 492: 490: 488: 487: 445: 442: 441: 440: 394: 391: 390: 389: 352: 349: 332: 329: 309: 306: 281: 278: 277: 276: 275: 274: 259:Islam in Italy 251: 250: 210: 205: 204: 203: 202: 201: 169: 168: 114: 111: 68: 67: 62: 57: 52: 47: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3241: 3232: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3219: 3215: 3211: 3207: 3199: 3197: 3196: 3193: 3190: 3187:. Thank you. 3186: 3182: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3145: 3142: 3138: 3137: 3128: 3121: 3119: 3118: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3099: 3097: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3077:New AN thread 3076: 3074: 3073: 3070: 3069: 3065: 3064: 3059: 3055: 3050: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3037: 3030:Social Action 3029: 3027: 3026: 3023: 3019: 3015: 3007: 3005: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2993:. Thank you. 2992: 2988: 2984: 2979: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2964: 2956: 2952: 2950: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2935: 2934: 2927: 2920: 2918: 2909: 2908: 2903: 2901: 2891: 2887: 2879: 2878: 2876: 2875:administrator 2872: 2869: 2865: 2862: 2861:save the page 2854: 2849: 2847: 2842: 2838: 2837: 2835: 2832: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2824: 2820: 2814: 2812: 2807: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2792: 2790: 2785: 2780: 2776: 2770: 2766: 2761: 2757: 2752: 2747: 2743: 2742:global blocks 2739: 2738:active blocks 2735: 2730: 2725: 2721: 2719: 2718:administrator 2705: 2702: 2697: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2682:contributions 2681: 2675: 2673: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2658: 2650: 2645: 2644: 2641: 2638: 2634: 2629: 2627: 2622: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2607: 2604: 2598: 2596: 2595: 2591: 2587: 2586: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2564: 2556: 2553: 2548: 2542: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2506: 2503: 2498: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2483:contributions 2482: 2476: 2474: 2471: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2456: 2448: 2441: 2438: 2434: 2431: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2375: 2373: 2372: 2369: 2366: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2349: 2343: 2338: 2334: 2329: 2321: 2319: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2294: 2288: 2285: 2280: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2268: 2263: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2250: 2246: 2242: 2234: 2228: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2168: 2165: 2163: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2142: 2140: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2122: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2100: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2077: 2074: 2069: 2065: 2059: 2055: 2052: 2049: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1997: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1967: 1963: 1960: 1955: 1949: 1948: 1945: 1942: 1937: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1909: 1904: 1898: 1894: 1893:third opinion 1890: 1886: 1879: 1876: 1874: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1834: 1832: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1816: 1809: 1807: 1805: 1802: 1799: 1796: 1793: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1742: 1736: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1711: 1707: 1699: 1697: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1683: 1677: 1673: 1671: 1670: 1667: 1662: 1656: 1651: 1647: 1639: 1632: 1630: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1584: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1563: 1561: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1543:Talk:Lombards 1540: 1532: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1517:Sardanaphalus 1514: 1510: 1509: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1497:Sardanaphalus 1494: 1487: 1479: 1476: 1472: 1471: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1453:Sardanaphalus 1450: 1444: 1431: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1420: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1398: 1395: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1367:Talk:Lombards 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1343: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1284: 1281: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1252: 1248: 1245: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1196: 1193: 1190: 1187: 1183: 1178: 1174: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1107: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1092: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1080: 1077: 1074: 1065: 1061: 1056: 1052: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1021: 1018: 1016: 1014: 1012: 1010: 1007: 1004: 1002: 1000: 998: 995: 991: 984: 980: 976: 972: 968: 964: 963: 954: 946: 942: 938: 934: 930: 929: 928: 927: 923: 919: 916:. Thanks ! -- 915: 908: 905: 901: 898: 895: 892: 888: 884: 880: 876: 872: 871: 870: 869: 866: 863: 860: 856: 852: 848: 840: 838: 837: 834: 831: 828: 819: 817: 816: 812: 808: 799: 797: 790: 787: 784: 781: 777: 771: 767: 764: 760: 759: 758: 755: 752: 749: 745: 740: 739: 738: 737: 734: 731: 728: 724: 721: 717: 713: 709: 704: 696: 694: 693: 689: 685: 680: 671: 668: 664: 660: 659: 658: 657: 654: 650: 646: 642: 641: 640: 639: 636: 632: 628: 620: 618: 617: 613: 609: 605: 597: 595: 594: 591: 588: 585: 581: 573: 571: 568: 567: 563: 559: 551: 549: 548: 544: 540: 536: 527: 523: 519: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 506: 502: 493: 491: 486: 483: 480: 477: 473: 472: 471: 470: 466: 462: 459: 455: 452:and not make 451: 443: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 422: 421: 420: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 392: 388: 385: 382: 379: 375: 374: 373: 372: 369: 366: 363: 359: 350: 348: 347: 343: 339: 338:65.190.89.154 330: 328: 327: 323: 319: 313: 307: 305: 304: 300: 296: 291: 287: 279: 273: 269: 265: 260: 255: 254: 253: 252: 249: 245: 241: 236: 232: 231: 230: 229: 225: 221: 217: 209: 206: 200: 198: 194: 190: 186: 182: 173: 172: 171: 170: 166: 162: 158: 154: 150: 143: 142: 141: 139: 135: 131: 127: 123: 112: 110: 109: 105: 101: 95: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 66: 63: 61: 58: 56: 53: 51: 48: 46: 43: 42: 41: 39: 35: 30: 29: 19: 3203: 3172: 3152: 3146: 3134: 3132: 3103: 3080: 3067: 3062: 3051: 3033: 3011: 2980: 2961: 2959: 2937: 2932: 2914: 2912: 2899: 2885: 2860: 2816: 2810: 2809: 2794: 2788: 2787: 2760:creation log 2727: 2715: 2689: 2679: 2669: 2661: 2655: 2630: 2623: 2608: 2605: 2602: 2581: 2568: 2490: 2480: 2467: 2459: 2453: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2379: 2350:from editing 2345: 2325: 2298: 2238: 2171: 2146: 2123: 2104: 2067: 1971: 1882: 1872: 1845:Ian Spackman 1838: 1813: 1746: 1710:Orderinchaos 1703: 1684: 1680: 1643: 1620:Ashmedai 119 1585: 1574:Ashmedai 119 1567: 1536: 1448: 1442: 1435: 1423: 1364: 1361:Edit warring 1341: 1323: 1287: 1257: 1181: 1176: 1167: 1155: 1069: 1059: 1054: 1047: 1027: 987: 982: 960:temporarily 959: 911: 885:comply with 882: 854: 844: 823: 803: 795: 775: 711: 700: 676: 624: 602:I think now 601: 577: 569: 555: 532: 497: 489: 447: 399:your qustion 396: 354: 334: 314: 311: 289: 285: 283: 234: 212: 176: 116: 69: 31: 27: 26: 3165:copyrighted 2580:carefully. 2522:Chip Berlet 2468:You do not 2346:you may be 2309:Enric Naval 2117:, click on 2056:Notice the 1922:User:Esimal 1885:User:Esimal 1720:Enric Naval 1687:Enric Naval 1674:infobox on 1404:Enric Naval 1038:or suggest 679:User:Newkai 312:Gennarous, 179:—Preceding 147:—Preceding 120:—Preceding 82:using four 3179:criterion 2900:Sandstein 2868:researched 2843:for ideas. 2756:filter log 2692:}} below. 2493:}} below. 1924:breaching 1835:Troubadour 1765:Wikipedias 1533:Talk pages 1449:titlestyle 1443:titlestyle 992:policy at 985:}} below. 235:ad hominem 72:Wikipedian 3189:Fut.Perf. 3141:copyright 2940:Gennarous 2915:read the 2819:vandalism 2797:Gennarous 2775:checkuser 2734:block log 2637:-- Vision 2610:effort.-- 2526:Gennarous 2416:consensus 2354:consensus 2322:July 2008 2119:this link 2115:this list 1930:WP:AN/3RR 1895:or other 1495:helpful. 1481:close to 1468:Hi again. 1309:Gennarous 1142:Gennarous 1137:deadlinks 1094:comment). 1064:WP:VANDAL 1040:mediation 1032:consensus 933:Gennarous 720:stay cool 684:Gennarous 645:Gennarous 518:Gennarous 185:Charlir91 153:Charlir91 126:Charlir91 74:! Please 3169:non-free 3063:lifebaka 3008:Civility 2968:fair use 2746:contribs 2640:Thing -- 2460:48 hours 2333:edit war 2143:rebetiko 2081:M.nelson 2033:M.nelson 2018:M.nelson 2003:M.nelson 1982:M.nelson 1781:fair use 1777:non-free 1700:Certain? 1570:template 1131:despite 1106:WP:STALK 887:WP:CIVIL 807:Attilios 805:work. -- 770:WP:CIVIL 450:civility 444:WP CIVIL 411:Worobiew 193:contribs 181:unsigned 161:contribs 149:unsigned 134:contribs 122:unsigned 100:Darwinek 50:Tutorial 28:Welcome! 3222:Stefan2 3110:RobertG 3054:WP:AN/I 2995:Sdrtirs 2926:unblock 2769:unblock 2695:Rodhull 2657:blocked 2612:Cberlet 2599:Fascism 2546:Rodhull 2496:Rodhull 2473:Fascism 2455:blocked 2440:Fascism 2348:blocked 2278:Rodhull 2261:Rodhull 2245:Cberlet 2241:Fascism 2235:Fascism 2219:rst20xx 2205:rst20xx 2190:rst20xx 2175:rst20xx 2153:Yangula 2068:blatant 1953:Rodhull 1935:Rodhull 1902:Rodhull 1889:uncivil 1785:Help us 1612:Lebanon 1604:Denmark 1164:WP:NPOV 962:blocked 918:Jotamar 841:Clarity 712:content 574:Request 34:welcome 3040:Checco 3018:Jmabel 2890:helpme 2859:) and 2848:Click 2700:andemu 2680:useful 2662:1 week 2578:WP:NPA 2574:WP:NPA 2551:andemu 2518:WP:OWN 2501:andemu 2481:useful 2423:WP:3RR 2362:Onorem 2283:andemu 2266:andemu 1958:andemu 1940:andemu 1926:WP:3RR 1918:advice 1907:andemu 1878:Nazism 1608:Crimea 1596:Greece 1486:Navbox 1347:Dionix 1327:Dionix 1291:Dionix 990:WP:3RR 744:WP:NPA 716:blocks 621:Sicily 539:Dionix 501:Dionix 494:Naples 430:Choess 397:About 318:Choess 280:Images 94:helpme 84:tildes 2919:first 2678:make 2479:make 1860:Srnec 1616:Malta 1592:Spain 1588:Italy 1551:Srnec 1513:there 1379:Srnec 1217:Srnec 1173:WP:DR 947:Block 820:Lomis 776:which 667:wiser 663:older 635:wiser 631:older 627:WP:RM 608:Wento 558:Wento 295:Srnec 264:Srnec 240:Srnec 220:Srnec 3226:talk 3175:per 3167:and 3114:talk 3091:talk 3044:talk 3022:Talk 2999:talk 2944:talk 2801:talk 2672:here 2668:for 2616:talk 2590:talk 2530:talk 2466:for 2407:and 2394:talk 2386:here 2313:talk 2249:talk 2223:talk 2209:talk 2194:talk 2179:talk 2157:talk 2134:talk 2085:talk 2037:talk 2022:talk 2007:talk 1986:talk 1864:talk 1849:talk 1841:this 1826:talk 1757:free 1724:talk 1691:talk 1655:page 1624:talk 1578:talk 1555:talk 1545:and 1541:and 1521:talk 1501:talk 1493:this 1457:talk 1424:Hi. 1408:talk 1383:talk 1369:and 1365:See 1351:talk 1342:some 1331:talk 1313:talk 1295:talk 1266:talk 1221:talk 1177:must 1160:WP:V 1146:talk 1091:This 1055:must 969:for 937:talk 922:talk 883:must 855:must 811:talk 688:talk 649:talk 612:talk 562:talk 543:talk 522:talk 505:talk 465:talk 434:talk 415:talk 342:talk 322:talk 299:talk 290:much 268:talk 244:talk 224:talk 189:talk 157:talk 130:talk 104:talk 76:sign 2779:log 2726:). 2470:own 2427:SSJ 2368:Dil 2360:. 1660:Eli 1168:one 1162:or 1156:may 1060:not 1048:not 286:not 3228:) 3181:F7 3171:, 3161:F4 3159:, 3151:. 3112:♬ 3093:) 3068:++ 3046:) 3020:| 3001:) 2978:. 2946:) 2929:}} 2923:{{ 2888:{{ 2813:: 2803:) 2791:: 2773:• 2767:• 2763:• 2758:• 2754:• 2749:• 2744:• 2740:• 2736:• 2618:) 2592:) 2532:) 2396:) 2315:) 2275:-- 2251:) 2225:) 2211:) 2196:) 2181:) 2159:) 2136:) 2087:) 2079:-- 2075:). 2039:) 2024:) 2009:) 1988:) 1866:) 1851:) 1828:) 1726:) 1693:) 1626:) 1614:, 1610:, 1606:, 1602:, 1598:, 1594:, 1590:, 1580:) 1557:) 1549:. 1523:) 1515:. 1503:) 1489:}} 1483:{{ 1459:) 1410:) 1385:) 1353:) 1333:) 1315:) 1297:) 1268:) 1223:) 1192:ka 1189:on 1186:El 1182:is 1148:) 1079:ka 1076:on 1073:El 939:) 924:) 897:ka 894:on 891:El 865:ka 862:on 859:El 833:ka 830:on 827:El 813:) 786:ka 783:on 780:El 754:ka 751:on 748:El 733:ka 730:on 727:El 725:-- 690:) 665:≠ 651:) 633:≠ 614:) 604:it 590:ka 587:on 584:El 564:) 545:) 537:? 524:) 507:) 482:ka 479:on 476:El 467:) 436:) 417:) 384:ka 381:on 378:El 368:ka 365:on 362:El 344:) 324:) 301:) 270:) 246:) 226:) 195:) 191:• 163:) 159:• 136:) 132:• 106:) 96:}} 92:{{ 3224:( 3192:☼ 3089:( 3042:( 2997:( 2942:( 2833:. 2799:( 2783:) 2781:) 2777:( 2732:( 2614:( 2588:( 2528:( 2430:☎ 2392:( 2365:♠ 2311:( 2247:( 2221:( 2207:( 2192:( 2177:( 2155:( 2132:( 2083:( 2035:( 2020:( 2005:( 1984:( 1862:( 1847:( 1824:( 1804:K 1801:a 1798:m 1795:a 1792:s 1789:O 1722:( 1689:( 1665:+ 1622:( 1576:( 1553:( 1519:( 1499:( 1455:( 1406:( 1381:( 1349:( 1329:( 1311:( 1293:( 1264:( 1219:( 1144:( 1066:. 996:. 935:( 920:( 809:( 686:( 647:( 610:( 560:( 541:( 520:( 503:( 463:( 432:( 413:( 340:( 320:( 297:( 266:( 242:( 222:( 187:( 175:f 155:( 128:( 102:( 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index