586:
for linking on
Knowledge (XXG). Our staff is comprised of solid writers, and further, we have no qualms or objections about not linking non-staff reviews on Knowledge (XXG). Additionally, I understand that the Sputnikmusic article on Knowledge (XXG) is subject to incessant, constant vandalism. This is not our administration's/moderators' doing; it's merely problem users wreaking havoc. We apologize for that inconvenience. Anyway, in summation, please re-consider Sputnikmusic from being blacklisted on Knowledge (XXG) once again - while the second sentence may arguably be hearsay, we have been told that reviews written by Sputnikmusic staff writers would be allowed to be linked on Knowledge (XXG).
792:
It, for lack of a better word at the moment, sucks to have one of the primary editors call the site "non-notable" despite the endorsement from
Metacritic and the other information that is provided in the edits that this account has been trying to make. There are numerous pages on Knowledge (XXG) that have links to staff reviews, but for them to be removed contradicts the site's placement on the list of permissible sites. If something can be done, awesome. If not, that's a shame, but life goes on. Thanks to Dirk and Anylayman for your patience and help. -
538:
without contention in the article's "External Links" section, and your own
External Links guidelines permit "a link to a page that is the subject of the article or an official page of the article subject" - which the page in question is. Why should it count "unreliable" and be rather slanderously labeled "spam" simply because of the site it is hosted on? By that logic a second-party source on another site would carry more weight than a first-party statement on a blog. Please review the material in question before blindly categorising it.
843:, established and whitelisted users are ignored by this bot, and they can add these links, so the reviews can still be added by these accounts (though its operators are alerted). Also, AntiSpamBot ignores edits where it is reverted again (though also here an alert is given to its opererators), so if a genuine edit is reverted by the editor again, it is likely that it is then ignored by the editors (or maybe they process the edit afterwards).
1010:
much everyone but the fans of the band - quite a brilliant thing, really. If you really want I can remove all links to the forum and
Doherty's posts, and just keep the text. However, I think this would take something away from the entry and would prefer not to. It's really beneficial to be able to include links to Doherty's posts to give the section credibility.
447:). Individual subpages, if spammed, may be blacklisted, but the domain should not be - it contains many more useful sites than any malware or other junk. However if we are concerned about usefulness of pages on such large hosts, we could have a discussion about blacklisting all major generic webhosts of that kind.--
812:. Unfortunately sputnikmusic.com has suffered the same faith (for the moment). Again, that the site is blacklisted on AntiSpamBot is related to how accounts in the past have been editing/adding this link, and should be seen separate from the quality of the site (which is, as proven by its listing on e.g.
659:
these two points, it would have been better to discuss the links on the talkpage. The function of AntiSpamBot is hence met here, warning 'new' editors that their link-additions may not be in line with policies or guidelines (AntiSpamBot will not revert on established (or whitelisted) registered users).
846:
Your second concern is indeed a bit difficult. AntiSpamBot can not evaluate where the link gets added. In this case you (as a 'new' editor) were reverted because you added "The staff is featured with on the main page." So in a way these reverts are 'collateral damage', though I do believe that in
791:
by AntiSpamBot - writing from a neutral point-of-view is not difficult, and there is no blatant advertising or obscene/objectionable material on the page. We are doing our best to get the page to meet
Knowledge (XXG)'s standards, but the reversals are maddening despite the easy fix to revert them.
772:
is certainly violated here). We do not need to add the links to your site just because your site has the information available, it should add to the information on the page. Sputnikmusic.com is therefore (at least for the moment) well on its place on the blacklist. I hope this explains. Thanks.
389:
The bot reverts to the last version before the active editor, which already contained the mistake. I don't think we can do anything about this, except if the bot would actually try to cut the 'bad' link out of the page before saving (but also that is very difficult to do automatically when the link
1063:
I understand that you removed the link I added to the article becuase it becuase it was a link to a commerical site. But I added the link becuase it was showing the teddy bear used as a mascot for the 1980 Olympic Games and as such relevant for the Teddy Bear
Knowledge (XXG) page. I had no interest
1009:
I hope you understand that the entry for thelibertines.org does have a real relevance to the band's history. Perhaps the best thing about the wiki entry is that it has a lot of information that many people may have missed seeing as so much of what
Doherty wrote on the forum went unnoticed by pretty
786:
on the list of permissible reputable, professional review sites, so it seems awfully contradictory that the site can be blacklisted AND professional at the same time. That's our (for now) only point of confusion because you guys have been helpful thus far. A second concern would be why the site's
686:
on the list of reputable, professional review sites, so it concerns us that there is a contradiction all of a sudden. While we are doing our part to try to fix our page, which is subject to vandalism from problem users from a separate section of our site, it would be nice to know why this happened
1029:
In terms of any 'self-promotion' accusations, 'thelibertines.org' is a totally free forum - no one makes any money out of it and no-one pays for bandwidth. It's free to sign up to, there is no member list and, in terms of forums, it is archaic. It never get's updated either. The only reason it has
986:
The forum's continued influence can be seen in
Doherty's songs (in 'Gang of Gin' he sings "I showed no decorum, spilled my heart out on the forum"), and also in the wider media (NME is currently offering a competition to win a signed Doherty guitar with the question being 'what was Pete Doherty's
658:
have recently instated a maximum of 10, I, and another editor do agree that that number is probably too high, but it was set for 10 to first have discussion on a more appropriate number). I hope you can understand that it is not the target of wikipedia to contain a complete list of reviews. Seen
585:
I understand the importance of AntiSpamBot, but I'm writing to ask for a reconsideration about blacklisting
Sputnikmusic as a reviews site. We have been in contact with various moderators/administrators, finally coming to an agreement that reviews written by our staff writers would be permissible
1042:
Thanks for the explanation. I reverted AntiSpamBot. The 'problem' is here that you were editing as an IP or a new user, which get reverted when adding 'spammy' links. When you would have re-reverted AntiSpamBot it should have left you alone (if not .. then this is indeed the right medium for a
622:
As noted, the link is to a staff writer's review, and did not maliciously damage the aforementioned page in any way. While we regrettably cannot control our problem users from vandalizing
Knowledge (XXG), please be assured that not all of our users - especially our staff writers - behave in this
982:
led to the British record industry repositioning it's stance on allowing/encouraging artists to give away music for free on the internet. Whereas before giving away so much ne wmaterial would have been seen as commercial suicide, it in fact made The Libertines more popular, and as a result other
537:
That tells me you did not look at the actual Myspace blog page in question. As I said, it is the definitive reliable source and the official public blog of a band member, no different to the homepage of the band. The Myspace page itself, which includes the blog in question, has been linked to
704:; the latter has voted that the Sputnikmusic page be deleted. Please note that in the edit that we have made an effort to meet Knowledge (XXG) guidelines, have written the article from a neutral point-of-view, and we are actually a legitimate, reputable website, which Keb25 has ignored despite
951:
regularily used pseudonyms on the forum to give fans private information about the band. He also personally announced the band's split on the forum in 2004, before any official announcement had been given. He also confided in fans on the forum about his now well publicised problems with drugs.
288:. The links were removed by AntiSpamBot. These links are not spam. The links gives the visitors the best possible information about destinations in Norway. The pages are not owned by any any comercial companies or privat persons. I feel that these links should be added to the articles.
600:
from Knowledge (XXG). If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule sputnikmusic\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Knowledge (XXG). Please read Knowledge (XXG)'s
851:, and the link is certainly not necessary here, there is a link to the domain in either the external links section, or in an infobox), and you are advised (per most of the cited policies and guidelines) not to add the links yourself, and not to edit these articles yourself (see
903:. Secondly, the links created are under the names of the character, which is misleading, it does not provide more information, the link is not even directly related to the subject of the page. Maybe you could upload the images and use them to illustrate the page? --
708:'s and our efforts to prove otherwise. I doubt that this is a power trip on his part, but there is nothing obscene or objectionable with the edit - the page has been improved and will continue to improve with some cooperation and patience. Please and thank you. -
231:
Thanks for explaining! I figured the content generally found on that domain must have been the reason, but I was linking to an actual informative (fan-made) website as there are no official websites. I will attempt a revert and see if it autoreverts again. --
209:
The edit got reverted because of the link, it does not mean that the rest of the edit is not OK. So I would add the interwiki link again. If I recall correctly, republica.pl is a forum site, which is the reason it is on AntiSpamBot's autorevert list (per
803:
I guess you could capture this on the same level as has been happening with some links to 'archives' (musea, universities, libraries, etc.). These sites are strictly non-commercial in some cases, still they have resulted in lengthy discussions on the
352:
Hmm .. problem with the diff, where our linkwatcher is apparently making a mistake. The edited text contains 'alivenotdead.com' (twice). Apparently it got reported and hence shadowbot reverted. We'll be working on that. Thanks for reporting this!
1030:
survived and stayed popular since The Libertines split up in 2004 is because of the legacy created from 2002 and the continued citations in biographies, television and radio programmes (which in itself seems to confirm the forums relevance).
934:, and made reference to a network54 forum used by the band from 2002 to 2005. While I understand that links to network54 forums may automatically considered to be spam, I would ask you to reconsider this case for the following reasons:
725:, we are talking here about who and how it was added. When it gets spammed (as in, link-additions only by single purpose accounts) then it goes onto the revert list. That a site is reputable then does not matter, we are writing an
977:
is also famous because of it's involvement in the 'Babyshambles Sessions' (where Doherty gave away three albums worth of brand new material on the internet for free). The emergence and popularity of the 'Babyshambles Sessions' on
760:), then that is an account exactly why these links should be on AntiSpamBots autorevert list. This accounts' main edits seem to be the addition of the links to your site to the wikipedia, indiscriminate if the link
1025:
career, it's is not too dissimilar. In fact, the person who created that band's myspace page was also posting their songs on thelibertines.org forum a good six months before creating their myspace page).
429:
Yes, as a free hosting service, it's very popular. But there seems to be a movement towards defining reliable sources as those that exercise more oversight than a free hosting service does.
200:
Reading the automated message again, I'm guessing that it was removed because the link is on the republika.pl domain. If so, was it correctly removed or should the link be restored? --
836:, the mass addition of links to one site is not within the scope of wikipedia, even for good, on-topic sites, and reversions of this is within the function of AntiSpamBot to revert.
497:). The blog and quote in question are the official public source and statement on the matter, and should not be marked as spam simply because they happen to reside on Myspace.
527:. If the information is really true that is stated there, there also is a better source available (the homepage of the band, music magazine sites?). Hope this explains. --
687:
when our site is on the aforementioned list. To us, this invalidates the conflict of interest argument as well as the "What Knowledge (XXG) is Not" argument. Cheers. -
956:
forum. Doherty would also frequently publish unreleased poetry and lyrics on the site, as well as advertising numerous 'guerilla gigs' by him and his band. In 2007, a
408:; the relevant regexp is "republika\.pl\/stranasmer"). The issue has recently resurfaced. It's a little confusing that the lists are also discussed at metawikimedia.
92:- on the grounds that included a link to urbandictionary.com. That seemed like a useful edit and certainly not spam. It would be nice to have that edit restored.
741:
editors make the edit (especially when they appear slightly controversial .. and there is another editor who does not agree with the edit). Also, it is not
102:
You're trying to cite a statement to a single entry made on a website not particularly known for its accuracy. Explain to me why the link should stay?
426:. I would prefer that the entire domain be blacklisted, unless WP can display a message like "Warning! Don't click ANYWHERE ELSE on this site!".
940:
network54 forum played an integral part in The Libertines history - as cited on numerous occasions in biographies on the band (Bound Together by
782:
Great, thanks for your thoroughness. Our only concern remains that, in reading and following your links, please observe that Sputnikmusic is
1013:
In conclusion, I believe that thelibertines.org was, for a short while, something of a cross between an internet version of the punk fanzine
884:
817:
43:
545:
504:
183:
474:), I see that there are WP policy issues involved that are much broader than the specific sites/operations of the bot as discussed here.
284:
Yesterday I tried to add links to various destinations in Visitnorway. Visitnorway.com is the english version of Visitnorway.no which is
606:
146:
757:
415:
808:(probably most are in the archives). Also, some of these links have been removed after an account performed link-additions
960:
television programme called 'The Seven Ages Of Rock' focussed on The Libertines use of the internet (directly referencing
380:
470:
Now that I find that Spambot targets brand-new editors, and allows other editors to insert these sites after a warning (
306:
411:
The domain has had a troubled history, including worms, malware, viruses, spam blacklisting - see the external sites
965:
424:
260:
888:
549:
508:
377:
805:
793:
709:
688:
633:
405:
This domain comes and goes on the blacklists/whitelists; right now the Spambot only blocks one subpage (see
880:
541:
500:
294:
134:
37:, and it appears to be for no reason..I was removing space between words and citations...annd that is it...
1065:
38:
1033:
519:
Blogs are hardly ever a reliable source, everyone can create a blog and put data on there, please review
17:
256:
67:
667:
610:
255:
Could someone clarify the current status of republika.pl? It has been re-introduced as a link in the
179:
142:
86:
753:
705:
998:
952:
Indeed, many music publications, such as NME, took entire news stories from quotes left by Pete on
157:
You were trying to cite a statement with a page on groups.msn.com. That site does not comply with
54:
813:
655:
493:
The AntiSpamBot instantly reverted an edit I had made linking to a quote made in a Myspace blog (
993:
663:
298:
873:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Pure_Pure_Mimi_to_Shippo_no_Monogatari&action=history
847:
this case the link should not be used in this way (this way of linking is not according to our
471:
454:
108:
833:
825:
597:
941:
840:
816:, OK, and the links are used as reviews on many articles (see the more than 400 links here:
614:
418:
125:
852:
848:
821:
769:
746:
734:
730:
726:
651:
647:
319:
315:
219:
421:
302:
138:
129:
971:
also aired a documentary where fans and the band spoke at length about the site in 2004.
900:
829:
721:
Yes, it is still on the revertlist. Please note that we are not talking about the sites
602:
563:
524:
520:
215:
211:
158:
1014:
1022:
927:
343:
93:
642:
As you may notice, the editor was an anonymous user, and seen the change of signature
1044:
904:
856:
774:
672:
650:. The addition was to a page which already contained quite a number of reviews (see
567:
528:
475:
430:
391:
354:
323:
264:
223:
162:
128:, and it deleted it. It was about the song being written in 30 minutes. Why is this?
1068:
1047:
1036:
990:
Here are a selection of national newspaper/magazine articles that mention the site:
907:
899:
Firstly, you are linking to imageshack, which is on the autorevert list as it fails
892:
859:
796:
777:
712:
691:
677:
636:
617:
570:
553:
531:
512:
478:
461:
433:
394:
383:
357:
346:
326:
267:
236:
226:
204:
194:
165:
150:
111:
96:
70:
48:
948:
450:
103:
390:
is there with a mistake). A strange case of 'collateral damage', I am afraid. --
1003:
592:
Thank you for contributing to Knowledge (XXG), 148.61.219.76! However, your edit
968:
966:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/sevenages/events/indie/the-libertines-guerrilla-gigs/
233:
201:
191:
1056:
701:
562:
Read the reliable source and external links guidelines. Myspace is clearly on
412:
376:
is what you inteneded. I suspect the missing "]" is what caused the problem.
62:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Marlin_Camp_Carbine&oldid=154616560
440:
263:. A Google search on "malware republika.pl" brings up a number of mentions.
768:
where the editor adds a link where there are already 15 others, so I think
1064:
whatever in promoting the sale of the teddy bear offered in this website.
682:
In reading and following your links, please observe that Sputnikmusic is
366:
1018:
444:
926:
AntiSpamBot removed an entire section on the page for the rock band
646:, I suspect that you are involved in the website. Please review
999:
http://arts.guardian.co.uk/fridayreview/story/0,,1271605,00.html
957:
994:
http://arts.independent.co.uk/books/reviews/article352245.ece
406:
286:
the norwegian Goverments official site for visitors to Norway
190:
citing that same policy. Did I use an incorrect template? --
182:
and added a Polish language template in accordance with the
921:
944:, Kids in the Riot by Pete Welsh being the most obvious).
783:
683:
220:
our 'what wikipedia is not' policy (i.e. "not a linkfarm")
662:
For more information I would suggest you to also contact
596:
was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove
983:
British rock bands would give away music to their fans.
872:
788:
765:
697:
643:
593:
494:
373:
340:
187:
90:
61:
34:
259:
article, and an editor defends the link's presence at
756:
above. When looking at this editors contributions (
1021:(if you look at the effect that site had on the
820:)). That can be seen as contradictory, but per
439:republika.pl is a Polish popular webhost (like
1004:http://www.nme.com/reviews/the-libertines/7537
752:OK, I had a second look. You are refering to
626:Thanks for your attention and consideration!
8:
737:, discuss on talkpages and let uninvolved,
987:username on thelibertines.org forum?').
291:– — … ° ≈ ≠ ≤ ≥ ± − × ÷ ← → · § Stvi
589:One example of AntiSpamBot's judgment:
451:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
930:. The section concerned was entitled
818:Special:LinkSearch/*.sputnikmusic.com
609:. For more information about me, see
605:for more information, and consult my
443:), related to a major Polish portal (
7:
178:When I restored an external link on
922:http://en.wikipedia.org/Libertines
853:our conflict of interest guideline
648:our conflict of interest guideline
564:Wp:el#Links_normally_to_be_avoided
24:
607:list of frequently-reverted sites
66:Which or what in these is spam?--
877:I undid it's revision, though.
806:talkpage of the Spam WikiProject
29:Did not even add a spam link....
758:Special:Contributions/Anylayman
339:Unsure why this edit happened:
309:) 08:12, August 21, 2007 (UTC).
1069:08:12, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
1048:20:55, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
1043:remark). Hope this helps. --
1037:20:45, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
908:10:01, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
893:16:30, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
860:15:06, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
797:14:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
778:09:54, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
713:06:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
696:UPDATE: Our edit was reverted
692:19:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
678:10:47, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
637:19:09, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
618:03:31, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
571:12:22, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
554:11:31, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
532:11:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
525:our reliable sources guideline
513:11:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
479:17:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
462:16:39, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
434:15:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
395:12:07, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
384:11:36, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
268:11:37, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
216:our reliable sources guideline
159:our reliable sources guideline
1:
855:). I hope this explains. --
358:07:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
347:05:14, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
327:07:31, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
237:18:11, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
227:11:31, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
205:08:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
195:08:08, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
166:12:57, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
151:12:12, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
901:our external links guideline
521:our external links guideline
85:You reverted an edit to the
964:). See here for more info:
764:adds to the page (see e.g.
222:). Hope this explains. --
212:our external link guideline
174:Polish language link revert
112:22:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
97:18:15, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
71:16:03, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
49:02:06, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
1084:
868:Removed two external links
666:. Hope this explains. --
632:On behalf of Sputnikmusic
322:. Hope this explains. --
603:external links guidelines
184:external links guidelines
814:WP:ALBUMS#Review sites
700:by AntiSpamBot and/or
656:the albums wikiproject
124:I added a citation to
60:The bot reverted this
33:The bot reverted this
770:what wikipedia is not
664:the album wikiproject
652:what wikipedia is not
314:Knowledge (XXG) is a
297:comment was added by
280:Links to VisitNorway.
18:User talk:AntiSpamBot
735:conflict of interest
675:on public computers)
261:Talk:Józef Piłsudski
180:The Death Gate Cycle
87:Patagonia (clothing)
81:Patagonia (clothing)
794:SputnikmusicReviews
710:SputnikmusicReviews
689:SputnikmusicReviews
634:SputnikmusicReviews
378:CambridgeBayWeather
55:Marlin Camp Carbine
947:Libertines singer
839:In the working of
45:JUSTICE IS SERVED!
980:thelibertines.org
975:thelibertines.org
962:thelibertines.org
954:thelibertines.org
938:thelibertines.org
932:thelibertines.org
895:
883:comment added by
733:. You do have a
676:
668:Beetstra (public)
556:
544:comment added by
515:
503:comment added by
472:User talk:Shadow1
310:
188:reverted the link
153:
137:comment added by
1075:
942:Anthony Thornton
878:
841:User:AntiSpamBot
670:
539:
498:
459:
457:
318:though, not the
292:
132:
126:In the Year 2525
106:
46:
41:
1083:
1082:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1066:212.179.253.197
1061:
919:
885:172.135.176.213
870:
849:manual of style
583:
491:
489:Tears for Fears
460:
455:
449:
403:
370:
337:
293:—The preceding
282:
257:Józef Piłsudski
176:
122:
104:
83:
58:
44:
39:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1081:
1079:
1060:
1054:
1051:
1050:
1034:89.243.205.100
1023:Arctic Monkeys
1008:
928:The Libertines
918:
917:The Libertines
915:
913:
911:
910:
869:
866:
863:
862:
844:
837:
801:
800:
799:
789:being reversed
754:User:Anylayman
750:
745:page, we dont
731:not a linkfarm
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
706:User:Anylayman
660:
582:
579:
576:
575:
574:
573:
546:81.106.231.199
535:
534:
505:81.106.231.199
490:
487:
484:
483:
482:
481:
465:
464:
448:
402:
399:
398:
397:
372:I don't think
369:
364:
361:
360:
336:
333:
330:
329:
281:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
175:
172:
169:
168:
121:
118:
115:
114:
89:article - see
82:
79:
75:
57:
52:
30:
27:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1080:
1071:
1070:
1067:
1058:
1055:
1053:
1049:
1046:
1045:Dirk Beetstra
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1015:Sniffin' Glue
1011:
1006:
1005:
1001:
1000:
996:
995:
991:
988:
984:
981:
976:
972:
970:
967:
963:
959:
955:
950:
945:
943:
939:
935:
933:
929:
924:
923:
916:
914:
909:
906:
905:Dirk Beetstra
902:
898:
897:
896:
894:
890:
886:
882:
875:
874:
867:
865:
861:
858:
857:Dirk Beetstra
854:
850:
845:
842:
838:
835:
831:
827:
823:
819:
815:
811:
807:
802:
798:
795:
790:
787:main page is
785:
781:
780:
779:
776:
775:Dirk Beetstra
771:
767:
763:
759:
755:
751:
748:
744:
740:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
714:
711:
707:
703:
699:
695:
694:
693:
690:
685:
681:
680:
679:
674:
673:Dirk Beetstra
669:
665:
661:
657:
653:
649:
645:
641:
640:
639:
638:
635:
630:
627:
624:
620:
619:
616:
612:
608:
604:
599:
595:
590:
587:
580:
578:
572:
569:
565:
561:
560:
559:
558:
557:
555:
551:
547:
543:
533:
530:
529:Dirk Beetstra
526:
522:
518:
517:
516:
514:
510:
506:
502:
496:
488:
486:
480:
477:
473:
469:
468:
467:
466:
463:
458:
452:
446:
442:
438:
437:
436:
435:
432:
427:
425:
422:
419:
416:
413:
409:
407:
400:
396:
393:
392:Dirk Beetstra
388:
387:
386:
385:
382:
379:
375:
368:
365:
363:
359:
356:
355:Dirk Beetstra
351:
350:
349:
348:
345:
341:
334:
332:
328:
325:
324:Dirk Beetstra
321:
317:
313:
312:
311:
308:
304:
300:
296:
289:
287:
279:
269:
266:
262:
258:
254:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
246:
238:
235:
230:
229:
228:
225:
224:Dirk Beetstra
221:
217:
213:
208:
207:
206:
203:
199:
198:
197:
196:
193:
189:
185:
181:
173:
171:
167:
164:
163:Dirk Beetstra
160:
156:
155:
154:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
131:
127:
119:
117:
113:
110:
107:
101:
100:
99:
98:
95:
91:
88:
80:
78:
76:
73:
72:
69:
64:
63:
56:
53:
51:
50:
47:
42:
36:
28:
26:
19:
1062:
1052:
1032:
1028:
1012:
1007:
1002:
997:
992:
989:
985:
979:
974:
973:
961:
953:
949:Pete Doherty
946:
937:
936:
931:
925:
920:
912:
876:
871:
864:
809:
761:
742:
738:
727:encyclopedia
722:
631:
628:
625:
621:
591:
588:
584:
581:Sputnikmusic
577:
536:
492:
485:
428:
410:
404:
401:Republika.pl
371:
362:
338:
335:Error report
331:
320:yellow pages
316:encyclopedia
290:
285:
283:
245:
177:
170:
123:
116:
84:
77:
74:
65:
59:
40:THROUGH FIRE
32:
25:
969:BBC Radio 1
879:—Preceding
822:WP:NOT#LINK
739:established
615:AntiSpamBot
611:my FAQ page
540:—Preceding
499:—Preceding
186:, this bot
133:—Preceding
68:91.153.18.6
1057:Teddy Bear
702:User:Keb25
654:(although
613:. Thanks!
139:Smartyshoe
130:Smartyshoe
698:yet again
623:fashion.
441:Geocities
344:Paul Erik
94:Rwxrwxrwx
881:unsigned
629:Signed,
568:JoeSmack
542:unsigned
501:unsigned
476:Novickas
431:Novickas
367:Utonagan
307:contribs
295:unsigned
265:Novickas
147:contribs
135:unsigned
1019:Myspace
834:WP:SPAM
826:WP:NPOV
784:located
723:content
684:located
445:Onet.pl
120:Comment
105:Shadow1
762:really
729:here,
381:(Talk)
234:Immora
202:Immora
192:Immora
109:(talk)
830:WP:EL
749:them.
456:talk
299:Stvik
161:. --
16:<
1059:edit
1017:and
889:talk
832:and
810:only
766:here
743:your
644:here
598:spam
594:here
550:talk
523:and
509:talk
495:diff
374:this
303:talk
218:and
143:talk
35:edit
958:BBC
747:own
891:)
828:,
824:,
773:--
566:.
552:)
511:)
423:,
420:,
417:,
414:,
353:--
342:--
305:•
214:,
149:)
145:•
887:(
671:(
548:(
507:(
453:|
301:(
141:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.