User talk:Apollo1203

405:, I read through the essay you linked and I understand the premise, however, I do not think it is applicable in my case here. I was only asking you to verify the most pressing issues based on Tamzin’s findings, not cite new or other reasons. Unless you are saying there are other reasons outside of what she has stated that are the reason for the block? The intent of my account was to create and improve articles with reliable and encylcopedic material. If you look through the edit history, you will see that I did not push a POV but use reliable and academic sources to state the facts listed within those sources. In fact, I just noticed a merge Tamzin did with the Akshardham (religion) article to Akshar Purushottam Darshan. In her edit summary, she states “all recent edits were from sockpuppets (WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Moksha88), and before they showed up it was actually even worse.” Tamzin is indicating that my edits (and Moksha88 who edited as well) actually began to improve the article? So again, my intent of joining Knowledge and editing was for the sole purpose of improvements and creating encyclopedic content. If you could please shed more clarity on the block, it will help me in my appeal and show that I am a distinct editor and my behavior is in fact completely different from Moksha88. Looking forward to hearing from you. 1898:, a meatpuppet is defined as "one who engages in the same behavior as another user in the same context, and who appears to be editing Knowledge solely for that purpose..." The numerous examples provided in this appeal show that I did not engage in the same behavior as the accused 'master' Moksha88. I skimmed through Moksha88's edit history, and the user has been editing quite longer than me, has a presence on medical-related articles, and has not influenced my editing. As stated by the policy and examples, the accusations of meatpuppetry are null. The harsh accusation of meatpuppetry also implies that I am attempting to "game the system." Based on this guideline 1074:, a meatpuppet is defined as "one who engages in the same behavior as another user in the same context, and who appears to be editing Knowledge solely for that purpose..." The numerous examples provided in this appeal show that I did not engage in the same behavior as the accused 'master' Moksha88. I skimmed through Moksha88's edit history, and the user has been editing quite longer than me, has a presence on medical-related articles, and has not influenced my editing. As stated by the policy and examples, the accusations of meatpuppetry are null. The harsh accusation of meatpuppetry also implies that I am attempting to "game the system." Based on this guideline 1996:

create a shared account. Based on the sockpuppetry policy, the Checkuser evidence, and my unique and distinct activity on Knowledge, I refute any claim of being a sockpuppet of Moksha88. Since joining Knowledge in 2019, my goal as an editor has always been to improve the encyclopedic value of articles, and my activity substantially reflects. In fact, the users who have accused me of various infractions have complimented my work. I hope that you favorably consider my case and allow me to continue contributing to the bank of knowledge found in Knowledge while defending its principles.

1172:

1330: 507: 1992:

example, an experienced editor had initially made this accusation against me, however, after examining the sources more closely, the editor apologized and acknowledged the contributions I made to significantly improve the Swaminarayan Sampradaya article. User Tamzin made a similar comment. In her edit summary she states that ‘sockpuppets’ improved the article, which I assume she is referring to myself or to Moksha88 as we both had made such edits.

1168:

1229: 128: 1901:, I have not made bad faith edits or violate Knowledge's core principles. I have not influenced vote stacking or any manipulation of policy to make an edit. Each of my edits and opinions on talk pages were based on Knowledge policies, and which I explained. Therefore, my contribution has not been to disrupt, but improve Knowledge. 1077:, I have not made bad faith edits or violate Knowledge's core principles. I have not influenced vote stacking or any manipulation of policy to make an edit. Each of my edits and opinions on talk pages were based on Knowledge policies, and which I explained. Therefore, my contribution has not been to disrupt, but improve Knowledge. 364:

reviewing administrator: my working hypothesis is that these are a number of individuals working closely together (closer than an ordinary meatpuppetry case, perhaps with one person directing the exact edits the others should make on a Google Doc), but both pure sockpuppetry and ordinary meatpuppetry are also quite possible.

1344:, interacting with users to inform them on articles or other updates is not violating policy. This was the only type of communication I had with Moksha88 or other editors. As my activity on Knowledge increased, I also encountered editors who did not agree with my edits. Even though it was not always reciprocated, 521:, interacting with users to inform them on articles or other updates is not violating policy. This was the only type of communication I had with Moksha88 or other editors. As my activity on Knowledge increased, I also encountered editors who did not agree with my edits. Even though it was not always reciprocated, 363:

This may have been another miscommunication. As I wrote at the SPI, I have not made a finding that this is sockpuppetry over meatpuppetry; when I referenced "sockpuppetry" above here, I meant that this block is for a violation of the sockpuppetry policy (as opposed to simply for POV pushing). For the

237:

I read through the response by Moksha88 and your reply thereafter where you state, "the core issue is not that there is a group of editors who edit Knowledge in favor of 'BAPS and associated entities' in opposition to a 'rival anti-BAPS sockfarm.'" Yet it appears that Tamzin has indicated otherwise.

1884:

The blocking admin did not clearly explain the reason(s) for the block, therefore, I have attempted to address what I believe to be the main causes. Above, I extensively proved how I am a distinct and independent editor through many examples and distinct features. I believe a main reason I am being

1654:

Tamzin cited English proficiency as evidence of sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. As stated above, I reside in the United States, and utilize tools such as Grammarly and Microsoft Word to ensure my writing was refined. There is no policy that states the use of grammatically correct English demonstrates

1361:

However, I realized to significantly improve articles, I needed to ensure my writing was devoid of error(s), specifically, grammatical, spelling, and formatting errors. To do so, I utilized two resources: Grammarly and Microsoft Word. When I copy-pasted my work, curly quotes would appear. I checked

1349:

I always engaged with them civilly and ensured my edit rationale was in Knowledge policy (such as the use of reliable sources, no original research, reaching consensus on talk pages). A few times I even collaborated with such editors to improve articles and ensure they were also following Knowledge

1060:

831:

538:

526:

348:

I know you’re quite busy, but can you please let me know which reasons Tamzins provided were relevant or not? Above, I’ve added numbers to the list of Tamzin's reasons so you can provide the numbers. By understanding which reasons were most relevant, it will help me in not only analyzing my actions

306:

Thank you for your question. The basis for my block was sockpuppetry. Absent sockpuppetry, POV pushing can also independently constitute grounds for a block or other restriction. However, the core issue in this case was sockpuppetry, so I didn't make any findings as to whether this account was also

1995:

After analyzing my activity under the standard of the sockpuppet policy, I can confidently say that I have not made problematic edits as an IP address, I have only operated one active account, I have never used another editor’s account, and I have never spoken with any known or unknown persons to

1947:

4. There were users who would cherry-pick information from sources and/or remove reliable sources violating Knowledge policy. By definition this is vandalism and pushing their own POV, however, I would engage with these users and in a civil manner attempt to help them understand why their actions

1674:

Tamzin has not properly examined the evidence, but after I did, there are no clear similarities that she claims. Moreover, a proper examination should not just look at the potential similarities between users that suggest sockpuppetry, but also it must examine if there are significant differences

1428:

Tamzin seems to be convinced that I share with Moksha88 a particular tendency to incorporate parenthetical policy short cuts that aren't linked, but her accusation isn't consistent with my edit history. Some edits I pulled from my history include edits where I link the policy without parenthesis,

1339:

As stated in the SPI, there are times where I agreed with Moksha88 and sometimes I did not. If the arguments, edits, or suggestions another user makes are supported with Knowledge policy, I cannot disagree with them. Similarly, if my edits and/or suggestions are within the rules, other good faith

1171:

1123:

850:

605:

516:

1681:

1. When I first joined Knowledge, I was still familiarizing myself with the syntax and common practices used. These growing pains are clearly evident with the basic errors I initially made, which an experienced user like Moksha88 clearly did not make in 2019, suggesting that we are independent

857:

1991:

A major issue with the accusation of POV-pushing is the premise that one (or multiple individuals) cannot have a verifiably established and common point of view. My edits were all supported by reliable sources (as per policy) and not cherry-picked, therefore, not pushing any specific POV. For

1167:

1934:

2. When POV-pushing unknown IPs or users made edits against policy, I would revert them and try to help the users understand how to abide by policy. When individuals that would push a pro-BAPS POV without reliable sources, I would I reverted them and help users understand how to abide by

1110:

1362:

Knowledge policies and the use of grammatical and spelling tools is not prohibited. As Talk Page posts were typically informal discussions, I did not utilize external tools therefore straight quotes are seen. If you take a look at many of my edits, I use straight quotes very commonly.

539:

1778:

5. Initially, I did not ping users during talk pages. Moksha88's edit history shows proficiency in tagging/pinging users, well before I joined Knowledge. When I began heavily engaging with users like Joshua Jonathan, almost a year after joining, I learned the correct way to ping

954:

1958:

This link is aanother example of POV and cherry-picked information regarding the philosophical foundations. However, I ensured I engaged with the user civilly and in an extremely thorough manner to explain why I believed my stance was correct, even if I was not returned the

1134:

1524:

Tamzin and Blablubbs believe another reason for my involvement with the accused sockpuppet farm is because "many accounts use pipe links to ping", which I found to also be untrue in my case. I've listed countless incidents where a piped username linking was not found:

701:

1332:

which shows that the spelling as 'Sampradaya' is more prominent. Moksha88 agreeing with this change shows that this user checked my work and agreed with the name change. I learned about this method of suggesting an article rename when I updated the Amir Khusrau title

509:

1417:

However, there were instances where thorough responses were required in which I utilized the tools mentioned. I've typically responded in great detail regarding the sources and material found in the reliable sources – a distinct feature of mine versus

594:

307:

independently blockable for POV pushing. I considered several of the points that you listed, as well as other linguistic similarities, in coming to this decision. Like in many behavioral investigations, there is often not a single

419:

Thank you for your question. This will be my final message on this talk page prior to an appeal: I will not be providing more extensive analysis except by email to a reviewing administrator for the reasons above and given on the

345:, thank you for the response and clarity. Previously there seemed to be ambiguity whether the cause for a block was sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry, but you have made it clear the block was based on sockpuppetry, not meatpuppetry. 1647:

The CheckUser on my account indicates I am located in the United States, which would make sense for my time stamp to fit the time Tamzin has mentioned. Therefore, this argument lacks relevance in the sockpuppet and meatpuppet

824:

1302:

My activity and edit history show that I am dissimilar to and distinct from Moksha88, and every user stated in the SPI. For example, after I joined Knowledge in 2019, I primarily edited music-related articles.

479:

1678:

Tamzin did not look at differences, that indicate that the editors are distinct, so below I indicate some distinctive stylistic features that I have which show I am an independent user, and not a sockpuppet:

854:

252:

Please clarify what the exact core issue is here. You state that the evidence in favor of the block decision is found at the SPI, so among the evidence that was provided, which swayed your decision? Was it:

1350:

policies. With the logic provided by Tamzin in the SPI about interacting with other editors, Kbhatt22 and Joshua Jonathan should also be indicted as sockpuppets or meatpuppets, but that makes no sense.

527:

1770:

4. I studied the correct method to transliterate indic text (Gujarati and Sanskrit text) into English and corrected errors, which others in the SPI didn't do suggesting I am an independent editor:

946:

4. I studied the correct method to transliterate indic text (Gujarati and Sanskrit text) into English and corrected errors, which others in the SPI didn't do suggesting I am an independent editor:

234:, I apologize for a delay in my response as I was away. I am shocked with this decision. As I read through the responses regarding the SPI, I am still left with many questions and quite confused. 1318:

As I began working on the Swaminarayan articles, I encountered editors that shared the same goal to improve and enhance the article's encyclopedic value. I joined the Swaminarayan Wikiproject

495:

As I began working on the Swaminarayan articles, I encountered editors that shared the same goal to improve and enhance the article's encyclopedic value. I joined the Swaminarayan Wikiproject

1324:

Through my continued efforts on improving Swaminarayan-related articles, I met user Moksha88 and others such as, ThaNDNman224, Harshmellow717, Skubydoo, Kbhatt22, and Joshua Jonathan.

501:

Through my continued efforts on improving Swaminarayan-related articles, I met user Moksha88 and others such as, ThaNDNman224, Harshmellow717, Skubydoo, Kbhatt22, and Joshua Jonathan.

1999:

I reposted my appeal - which has been formatted for ease of reading - to address the accusations in detail. I am requesting an admin to please read through my appeal and reconsider.

1670:

5. Similar time stamps – which I refuted by showing statistically it is not unlikely that a handful of users could be from North America and share the same time frame of editing.

846:

5. Similar time stamps – which I refuted by showing statistically it is not unlikely that a handful of users could be from North America and share the same time frame of editing.

1762:

3. I had an inclination to clean and organize reference lists, a habit that is definitely unique to me amongst the people in the SPI, suggesting that I am an independent editor:

938:

3. I had an inclination to clean and organize reference lists, a habit that is definitely unique to me amongst the people in the SPI, suggesting that I am an independent editor:

1910:

1. For example, I removed honorifics in Swaminarayan/BAPS Swaminarayan related articles, ensuring that information that is published on Knowledge aligns with its policy

1086:

1. For example, I removed honorifics in Swaminarayan/BAPS Swaminarayan related articles, ensuring that information that is published on Knowledge aligns with its policy

1312:

Thereafter, I began editing Hinduism, more specifically Swaminarayan-related, articles. Many of these articles presented the opportunity for significant improvements.

489:

Thereafter, I began editing Hinduism, more specifically Swaminarayan-related, articles. Many of these articles presented the opportunity for significant improvements.

1857:

6. When I referenced the Vachanamrut text, I wrote the references in a unique manner compared to Moksha88. This difference suggests that I am an independent editor:

1662:

1. Messaging and talking back and forth with users – which I refuted by showing the discussions were strictly in adherence with policy and not to influence opinions

1033:

6. When I referenced the Vachanamrut text, I wrote the references in a unique manner compared to Moksha88. This difference suggests that I am an independent editor:

838:

1. Messaging and talking back and forth with users – which I refuted by showing the discussions were strictly in adherence with policy and not to influence opinions

1299:

a sockpuppet and I have not misused multiple Knowledge accounts. First, the CheckUser proved that I am not associated with the other editors listed in the SPI.

476:

a sockpuppet and I have not misused multiple Knowledge accounts. First, the CheckUser proved that I am not associated with the other editors listed in the SPI.

1255: 154: 1963:

5. I collectively worked with users who had other points of view. For example, I worked with user Kbhatt22 to improve the Swaminarayan Sampradaya article:

1139:

5. I collectively worked with users who had other points of view. For example, I worked with user Kbhatt22 to improve the Swaminarayan Sampradaya article:

1666:

3. Parenthetical policy-shortcut references, often unlinked - which I refuted by showing that I typically link policy references, distinct from Moksha88.

842:

3. Parenthetical policy-shortcut references, often unlinked - which I refuted by showing that I typically link policy references, distinct from Moksha88.

73: 2046:. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at 249:. Are you disagreeing with Tamzin regarding POV-pushing? As you can imagine this is causing confusion and I can’t quite grasp the rationale for a block. 1336:. Tamzin argues the discussion Moksha88 and I had regarding academic and reliable sources is violating policy, yet no policy states this is illegal. 513:. Tamzin argues the discussion Moksha88 and I had regarding academic and reliable sources is violating policy, yet no policy states this is illegal. 1675:

between two (or more) users that would refute sockpuppetry. Only after examining both sides could one objectively make accusations of sockpuppetry.

1672:

6. Proficiency in the English language – which I refuted by stating that I reside in the United States and use tools to check and correct grammar.

851:

between two (or more) users that would refute sockpuppetry. Only after examining both sides could one objectively make accusations of sockpuppetry.

848:

6. Proficiency in the English language – which I refuted by stating that I reside in the United States and use tools to check and correct grammar.

2043: 38: 1277: 311:

or a single "but-for" cause. Rest assured that I came to this decision following careful consideration over the course of several weeks. Best,

176: 1321:

and I announced my intent to improve the Vachanamrut article and invited other members of the Wikiproject to contribute at their convenience.

498:

and I announced my intent to improve the Vachanamrut article and invited other members of the Wikiproject to contribute at their convenience.

79: 1284: 183: 1943:

3. I would analyze all viewpoints before making any edits or suggestion. I would not cherry-pick from sources to favor a certain claim.

1119:

3. I would analyze all viewpoints before making any edits or suggestion. I would not cherry-pick from sources to favor a certain claim.

1289:

I have been wrongfully blocked as a sockpuppet/meatpuppet and below are my points addressing the 6 sockpuppet accusations by Tamzin.

466:

I have been wrongfully blocked as a sockpuppet/meatpuppet and below are my points addressing the 6 sockpuppet accusations by Tamzin.

1509:

The above examples show that the majority of my policy references in my edits are linked, significantly different than Moksha88:

686:

The above examples show that the majority of my policy references in my edits are linked, significantly different than Moksha88:

1740:

2. I tend to use a numbered list to explain my points, which Moksha88 does not do, indicating that I am an independent editor:

916:

2. I tend to use a numbered list to explain my points, which Moksha88 does not do, indicating that I am an independent editor:

97: 24: 1956: 1907:

My edits and contributions were based on reliable and academic sources, not 'partisan' sources which could skew the content.

1132: 1083:

My edits and contributions were based on reliable and academic sources, not 'partisan' sources which could skew the content.

1205:; I have restructured the appeal above for ease of reading. Due to the nature of this block, I had to address each point. 68: 1326:

Tamzin calls out an instance where Moksha88 agrees with me for proposing an article rename ("Sampraday" to "Sampradaya.")

503:

Tamzin calls out an instance where Moksha88 agrees with me for proposing an article rename ("Sampraday" to "Sampradaya.")

292:

A CheckUser resulted in no relation to the others, so what is the deciding factor here? I look forward to your response.

2042:

may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the

59: 258:

that the accounts have worked together for over 6 years? Even though my account has only been active since March 2019

446: 393: 333: 220: 92: 238:

For example, in the SPI discussions she has stated to users Joshua Jonathan and Kbhatt22 that this is POV-pushing

2039: 1242: 1237: 141: 136: 106: 1266: 1259: 1247: 165: 158: 146: 1960: 1885:

accused of being a meatpuppet is because a group of editors share a POV and are allegedly pushing this POV.

1136: 1061:

accused of being a meatpuppet is because a group of editors share a POV and are allegedly pushing this POV.

1668:

4. Piped username linking - which I refuted by showing numerous examples contrary to the accused behavior.

844:

4. Piped username linking - which I refuted by showing numerous examples contrary to the accused behavior.

1655:

sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. Thus, the propounded evidence in the allegation is baseless and unfounded.

832:

sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. Thus, the propounded evidence in the allegation is baseless and unfounded.

244: 1984:

Collaboration with Joshua Jonathan to improve the article where he again compliments my updates/edits:

1955:

This link is an example of a POV being pushed by cherry-picked information from an unreliable source.

1160:

Collaboration with Joshua Jonathan to improve the article where he again compliments my updates/edits:

1131:

This link is an example of a POV being pushed by cherry-picked information from an unreliable source.

1429:

times where I have linked a policy with parenthesis, and incidents where I have a blend of the both.

1181: 606:

times where I have linked a policy with parenthesis, and incidents where I have a blend of the both.

1273: 172: 49: 1664:

2. Using straight quotes vs. curly quotes – which I refuted by showing why and how I had used both

1322: 840:

2. Using straight quotes vs. curly quotes – which I refuted by showing why and how I had used both

499: 349:

which lead to this block, but it will also help write my appeal. I look forward to your response.

2047: 111: 64: 1986: 1980: 1974: 1972: 1969: 1966: 1953: 1951: 1421: 1419: 1356:

Initially, I directly edited articles without using external tools to check grammar or spelling

1347: 1162: 1156: 1150: 1148: 1145: 1142: 1129: 1127: 598: 596: 533:

Initially, I directly edited articles without using external tools to check grammar or spelling

524: 1875:

3. Habitually cleaning and formatting references to maintain a clean article reference section.

1051:

3. Habitually cleaning and formatting references to maintain a clean article reference section.

1881:

6. Referencing the Vachanamrut text in a specific manner, distinct from how Moksha88 has done.

1057:

6. Referencing the Vachanamrut text in a specific manner, distinct from how Moksha88 has done.

45: 1879:

5. The transition and distinct style of pinging users once I became familiar with the method.

1055:

5. The transition and distinct style of pinging users once I became familiar with the method.

2054: 189: 108: 1968:. This is an example of extensive discussion and collaboration on pictures on the article: 1144:. This is an example of extensive discussion and collaboration on pictures on the article: 2019: 2000: 1206: 1189: 1173: 406: 368: 350: 293: 20: 371:; I'll submit any relevant analysis directly to a reviewing administrator if necessary. 1895: 1071: 440: 387: 327: 214: 1425:

3. Tamzin's accusation of "parenthetical policy-shortcut references, often unlinked"

1251: 602:

3. Tamzin's accusation of "parenthetical policy-shortcut references, often unlinked"

150: 1877:

4. Correct transliterations of indic text, specifically Gujarati and Sanskrit words.

1053:

4. Correct transliterations of indic text, specifically Gujarati and Sanskrit words.

1949: 1125: 1899: 1329:. The rationale for such change was based on academic publications and the n-gram, 1075: 506:. The rationale for such change was based on academic publications and the n-gram, 243:. Tamzin also states on the NPOV noticeboard that this is an issue of POV-pushing 1871:

1. Elementary mistakes as I was becoming more familiar with editing on Knowledge.

1047:

1. Elementary mistakes as I was becoming more familiar with editing on Knowledge.

2038:! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to 2015: 1971:. Discussion between Joshua Jonathan and myself in trying to reach consensus: 1873:

2. The tendency to use numbered lists to show the main points in a discussion.

1202: 1185: 1147:. Discussion between Joshua Jonathan and myself in trying to reach consensus: 1049:

2. The tendency to use numbered lists to show the main points in a discussion.

1315:

1. Tamzin's accusation: "Agreeing with users" and "messaging back and forth"

492:

1. Tamzin's accusation: "Agreeing with users" and "messaging back and forth"

1911: 1087: 434: 426: 402: 381: 373: 342: 321: 313: 231: 208: 200: 1637:

Again, my edit history shows that this claim by Tamzin does not hold true.

1228: 814:

Again, my edit history shows that this claim by Tamzin does not hold true.

127: 110: 1888:

Now, I will address the accusations of meatpuppetry and POV-pushing below.

1064:

Now, I will address the accusations of meatpuppetry and POV-pushing below.

261:

me agreeing with other users who shared a similar point of view on topics?

1283:

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the

270:

collaborating on talk pages, which was interpreted as skewing talk pages?

182:

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the

2061: 2023: 2008: 1214: 1193: 450: 414: 397: 358: 337: 301: 224: 186:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: 1868:

In summary, my edit history shows unique and distinct features such as:

1287:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: 1044:

In summary, my edit history shows unique and distinct features such as:

1643:

Sharing a similar time stamp of edits seems more likely than not as

1334: 820:

Sharing a similar time stamp of edits seems more likely than not as

511: 1272:, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be 367:

As for your question about which factors were more relevant: I am

171:, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be 422:

four other talk pages at which you have been asking me questions

1180:) 04:34, 25 November 2021 (UTC) |decline = Procedural decline; 112: 15: 1227: 126: 1735:

1e. Understanding the use of reliable and correct sources:

911:

1e. Understanding the use of reliable and correct sources:

1993: 1964: 1944: 1940: 1938: 1936: 1931: 1929: 1927: 1925: 1923: 1921: 1919: 1917: 1915: 1863: 1861: 1859: 1853: 1851: 1849: 1847: 1845: 1843: 1841: 1839: 1837: 1835: 1833: 1831: 1829: 1827: 1825: 1823: 1821: 1819: 1817: 1815: 1813: 1811: 1809: 1807: 1805: 1803: 1801: 1799: 1797: 1795: 1793: 1791: 1789: 1787: 1785: 1783: 1781: 1774: 1772: 1766: 1764: 1758: 1756: 1754: 1752: 1750: 1748: 1746: 1744: 1742: 1736: 1732: 1730: 1728: 1726: 1724: 1720: 1718: 1716: 1714: 1712: 1710: 1708: 1706: 1704: 1702: 1701:

1c. Minor mistakes such as forgetting to sign my posts:

1698: 1694: 1692: 1690: 1688: 1686: 1634: 1632: 1630: 1628: 1626: 1624: 1622: 1620: 1618: 1616: 1614: 1612: 1610: 1608: 1606: 1604: 1602: 1600: 1598: 1596: 1594: 1592: 1590: 1588: 1586: 1584: 1582: 1580: 1578: 1576: 1574: 1572: 1570: 1568: 1566: 1564: 1562: 1560: 1558: 1556: 1554: 1552: 1550: 1548: 1546: 1544: 1542: 1540: 1538: 1536: 1534: 1532: 1530: 1528: 1526: 1517: 1515: 1513: 1511: 1505: 1503: 1501: 1494: 1492: 1490: 1488: 1486: 1484: 1477: 1475: 1473: 1471: 1469: 1467: 1465: 1463: 1461: 1459: 1457: 1455: 1453: 1451: 1449: 1447: 1445: 1443: 1441: 1439: 1437: 1415: 1413: 1411: 1409: 1407: 1405: 1403: 1401: 1399: 1397: 1395: 1393: 1391: 1389: 1387: 1385: 1383: 1381: 1379: 1377: 1375: 1373: 1371: 1369: 1367: 1365: 1359: 1357: 1345: 1337: 1327: 1319: 1310: 1308: 1306: 1304: 1300: 1169: 1140: 1120: 1116: 1114: 1112: 1107: 1105: 1103: 1101: 1099: 1097: 1095: 1093: 1091: 1039: 1037: 1035: 1029: 1027: 1025: 1023: 1021: 1019: 1017: 1015: 1013: 1011: 1009: 1007: 1005: 1003: 1001: 999: 997: 995: 993: 991: 989: 987: 985: 983: 981: 979: 977: 975: 973: 971: 969: 967: 965: 963: 961: 959: 957: 950: 948: 942: 940: 934: 932: 930: 928: 926: 924: 922: 920: 918: 912: 908: 906: 904: 902: 900: 896: 894: 892: 890: 888: 886: 884: 882: 880: 878: 877:

1c. Minor mistakes such as forgetting to sign my posts:

874: 870: 868: 866: 864: 862: 811: 809: 807: 805: 803: 801: 799: 797: 795: 793: 791: 789: 787: 785: 783: 781: 779: 777: 775: 773: 771: 769: 767: 765: 763: 761: 759: 757: 755: 753: 751: 749: 747: 745: 743: 741: 739: 737: 735: 733: 731: 729: 727: 725: 723: 721: 719: 717: 715: 713: 711: 709: 707: 705: 703: 694: 692: 690: 688: 682: 680: 678: 671: 669: 667: 665: 663: 661: 654: 652: 650: 648: 646: 644: 642: 640: 638: 636: 634: 632: 630: 628: 626: 624: 622: 620: 618: 616: 614: 592: 590: 588: 586: 584: 582: 580: 578: 576: 574: 572: 570: 568: 566: 564: 562: 560: 558: 556: 554: 552: 550: 548: 546: 544: 542: 536: 534: 522: 514: 504: 496: 487: 485: 483: 481: 477: 247: 241: 239: 1645:

20% of Knowledge editors reside in the United States.

822:

20% of Knowledge editors reside in the United States.

369:

not going to publicly list the most probative factors

1978:

Kbhatt22 and Joshua Jonathan agreeing with my edits:

1154:

Kbhatt22 and Joshua Jonathan agreeing with my edits:

282:

that sometimes I would not link my policy citations?

1988:(working on images for the article with all users). 1164:(working on images for the article with all users). 1521:4. Tamzin's accusation of piped username linking 698:4. Tamzin's accusation of piped username linking 27:, where you can send them messages and comments. 1353:2. Tamzin's accusation: Use of straight quotes 530:2. Tamzin's accusation: Use of straight quotes 276:the style of quotes (curly vs. straight) used? 2030:Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed 1340:users would tend to agree with them as well. 517:users would tend to agree with them as well. 264:my use of past participles in edit summaries? 8: 1640:5. Tamzin's accusation – similar time stamps 1256:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Moksha88 817:5. Tamzin's accusation – similar time stamps 155:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Moksha88 1651:6. Tamzin's accusation – speech register 828:6. Tamzin's accusation – speech register 1342:Based on the policy of user talk pages 519:Based on the policy of user talk pages 308: 1659:In summary, Tamzin has accused me of: 835:In summary, Tamzin has accused me of: 246:, as well as on KBhatt22’s talk page 7: 1697:1b. Asking for guidance from others: 873:1b. Asking for guidance from others: 279:proficiency in the English language? 1723:1d. Incorrectly capitalizing title: 899:1d. Incorrectly capitalizing title: 1434:Linking policy without parenthesis 1258:. Note that multiple accounts are 611:Linking policy without parenthesis 157:. Note that multiple accounts are 14: 39:Click here to start a new topic. 1481:Linking policy with parenthesis 658:Linking policy with parenthesis 1254:per the evidence presented at 267:was it that I have PCR rights? 153:per the evidence presented at 1: 1215:18:25, 11 December 2021 (UTC) 1194:10:39, 25 November 2021 (UTC) 36:Put new text under old text. 2062:17:14, 10 January 2023 (UTC) 2024:03:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC) 1498:Unlinked without parenthesis 675:Unlinked without parenthesis 2009:06:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC) 1364:Some examples of this are: 541:Some examples of this are: 44:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 2079: 1431:Some examples of this are: 608:Some examples of this are: 273:because I voted on an RfD? 2014:Do not e-mail me again.-- 1285:guide to appealing blocks 1248:abusing multiple accounts 398:18:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC) 359:12:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC) 338:05:11, 28 June 2021 (UTC) 302:02:45, 28 June 2021 (UTC) 285:a similar sleep schedule? 225:01:37, 25 June 2021 (UTC) 184:guide to appealing blocks 147:abusing multiple accounts 74:Be welcoming to newcomers 2004: 1891:Accusation: Meatpuppetry 1210: 1177: 1067:Accusation: Meatpuppetry 451:00:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC) 415:00:50, 4 July 2021 (UTC) 410: 354: 297: 1904:Accusation: POV-Pushing 1223:Blocked as a sockpuppet 1080:Accusation: POV-Pushing 122:Blocked as a sockpuppet 1232: 131: 69:avoid personal attacks 1231: 194:Your reason here ~~~~ 130: 1250:as a sockpuppet of 149:as a sockpuppet of 1233: 132: 80:dispute resolution 41: 1246:from editing for 433: 380: 320: 207: 145:from editing for 119: 118: 60:Assume good faith 37: 2070: 2060: 2059: 2057: 431: 378: 318: 205: 197: 113: 16: 2078: 2077: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2055: 2053: 2051: 2040:AutoWikiBrowser 2032: 1948:were not valid 1685:1a. Formatting: 1281: 1225: 1124:were not valid 861:1a. Formatting: 309:deciding factor 228: 227: 187: 180: 124: 115: 114: 109: 86: 85: 55: 12: 11: 5: 2076: 2074: 2031: 2028: 2027: 2026: 1990: 1989: 1962: 1946: 1942: 1933: 1909: 1908: 1906: 1902: 1893: 1889: 1887: 1886: 1883: 1882: 1880: 1878: 1876: 1874: 1872: 1870: 1866: 1865: 1855: 1776: 1768: 1760: 1738: 1734: 1722: 1700: 1696: 1684: 1679: 1677: 1676: 1673: 1671: 1669: 1667: 1665: 1663: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1642: 1638: 1636: 1523: 1519: 1507: 1496: 1479: 1432: 1430: 1427: 1423: 1363: 1355: 1351: 1325: 1317: 1313: 1294: 1290: 1288: 1282: 1235:You have been 1234: 1226: 1224: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1166: 1165: 1138: 1122: 1118: 1109: 1085: 1084: 1082: 1078: 1069: 1065: 1063: 1062: 1059: 1058: 1056: 1054: 1052: 1050: 1048: 1046: 1042: 1041: 1031: 952: 944: 936: 914: 910: 898: 876: 872: 860: 855: 853: 852: 849: 847: 845: 843: 841: 839: 837: 833: 830: 826: 819: 815: 813: 700: 696: 684: 673: 656: 609: 607: 604: 600: 540: 532: 528: 502: 494: 490: 471: 467: 464: 463: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 365: 346: 290: 289: 288: 287: 286: 283: 280: 277: 274: 271: 268: 265: 262: 259: 250: 235: 181: 134:You have been 133: 125: 123: 120: 117: 116: 107: 105: 104: 101: 100: 88: 87: 84: 83: 76: 71: 62: 56: 54: 53: 42: 33: 32: 29: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2075: 2064: 2063: 2058: 2050:. Thank you! 2049: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1997: 1994: 1987: 1985: 1981: 1979: 1975: 1973: 1970: 1967: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1954: 1952: 1950: 1945: 1941: 1939: 1937: 1932: 1930: 1928: 1926: 1924: 1922: 1920: 1918: 1916: 1913: 1905: 1900: 1897: 1892: 1869: 1864: 1862: 1860: 1858: 1854: 1852: 1850: 1848: 1846: 1844: 1842: 1840: 1838: 1836: 1834: 1832: 1830: 1828: 1826: 1824: 1822: 1820: 1818: 1816: 1814: 1812: 1810: 1808: 1806: 1804: 1802: 1800: 1798: 1796: 1794: 1792: 1790: 1788: 1786: 1784: 1782: 1780: 1775: 1773: 1771: 1767: 1765: 1763: 1759: 1757: 1755: 1753: 1751: 1749: 1747: 1745: 1743: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1731: 1729: 1727: 1725: 1721: 1719: 1717: 1715: 1713: 1711: 1709: 1707: 1705: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1693: 1691: 1689: 1687: 1683: 1660: 1652: 1646: 1641: 1635: 1633: 1631: 1629: 1627: 1625: 1623: 1621: 1619: 1617: 1615: 1613: 1611: 1609: 1607: 1605: 1603: 1601: 1599: 1597: 1595: 1593: 1591: 1589: 1587: 1585: 1583: 1581: 1579: 1577: 1575: 1573: 1571: 1569: 1567: 1565: 1563: 1561: 1559: 1557: 1555: 1553: 1551: 1549: 1547: 1545: 1543: 1541: 1539: 1537: 1535: 1533: 1531: 1529: 1527: 1522: 1518: 1516: 1514: 1512: 1510: 1506: 1504: 1502: 1499: 1495: 1493: 1491: 1489: 1487: 1485: 1482: 1478: 1476: 1474: 1472: 1470: 1468: 1466: 1464: 1462: 1460: 1458: 1456: 1454: 1452: 1450: 1448: 1446: 1444: 1442: 1440: 1438: 1435: 1426: 1422: 1420: 1416: 1414: 1412: 1410: 1408: 1406: 1404: 1402: 1400: 1398: 1396: 1394: 1392: 1390: 1388: 1386: 1384: 1382: 1380: 1378: 1376: 1374: 1372: 1370: 1368: 1366: 1360: 1358: 1354: 1348: 1346: 1343: 1338: 1335: 1331: 1328: 1323: 1320: 1316: 1311: 1309: 1307: 1305: 1301: 1298: 1293: 1286: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1269: 1268: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1252:User:Moksha88 1249: 1245: 1244: 1240: 1239: 1230: 1222: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1182:WP:WALLOFTEXT 1179: 1175: 1170: 1163: 1161: 1157: 1155: 1151: 1149: 1146: 1143: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1130: 1128: 1126: 1121: 1117: 1115: 1113: 1108: 1106: 1104: 1102: 1100: 1098: 1096: 1094: 1092: 1089: 1081: 1076: 1073: 1068: 1045: 1040: 1038: 1036: 1034: 1030: 1028: 1026: 1024: 1022: 1020: 1018: 1016: 1014: 1012: 1010: 1008: 1006: 1004: 1002: 1000: 998: 996: 994: 992: 990: 988: 986: 984: 982: 980: 978: 976: 974: 972: 970: 968: 966: 964: 962: 960: 958: 956: 951: 949: 947: 943: 941: 939: 935: 933: 931: 929: 927: 925: 923: 921: 919: 917: 913: 909: 907: 905: 903: 901: 897: 895: 893: 891: 889: 887: 885: 883: 881: 879: 875: 871: 869: 867: 865: 863: 859: 836: 829: 823: 818: 812: 810: 808: 806: 804: 802: 800: 798: 796: 794: 792: 790: 788: 786: 784: 782: 780: 778: 776: 774: 772: 770: 768: 766: 764: 762: 760: 758: 756: 754: 752: 750: 748: 746: 744: 742: 740: 738: 736: 734: 732: 730: 728: 726: 724: 722: 720: 718: 716: 714: 712: 710: 708: 706: 704: 699: 695: 693: 691: 689: 687: 683: 681: 679: 676: 672: 670: 668: 666: 664: 662: 659: 655: 653: 651: 649: 647: 645: 643: 641: 639: 637: 635: 633: 631: 629: 627: 625: 623: 621: 619: 617: 615: 612: 603: 599: 597: 593: 591: 589: 587: 585: 583: 581: 579: 577: 575: 573: 571: 569: 567: 565: 563: 561: 559: 557: 555: 553: 551: 549: 547: 545: 543: 537: 535: 531: 525: 523: 520: 515: 512: 508: 505: 500: 497: 493: 488: 486: 484: 482: 478: 475: 470: 452: 448: 445: 442: 439: 436: 429: 428: 423: 418: 417: 416: 412: 408: 404: 401: 400: 399: 395: 392: 389: 386: 383: 376: 375: 370: 366: 362: 361: 360: 356: 352: 347: 344: 341: 340: 339: 335: 332: 329: 326: 323: 316: 315: 310: 305: 304: 303: 299: 295: 291: 284: 281: 278: 275: 272: 269: 266: 263: 260: 257: 256: 255: 254: 251: 248: 245: 242: 240: 236: 233: 230: 229: 226: 222: 219: 216: 213: 210: 203: 202: 195: 191: 185: 178: 174: 170: 168: 167: 160: 156: 152: 151:User:Moksha88 148: 144: 143: 139: 138: 129: 121: 103: 102: 99: 96: 94: 90: 89: 81: 77: 75: 72: 70: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 51: 47: 46:Learn to edit 43: 40: 35: 34: 31: 30: 26: 22: 18: 17: 2035: 2033: 1998: 1983: 1977: 1903: 1894:Pursuant to 1890: 1867: 1856: 1777: 1769: 1761: 1739: 1680: 1658: 1656: 1650: 1644: 1639: 1520: 1508: 1497: 1480: 1433: 1424: 1352: 1341: 1314: 1296: 1292:Sockpuppetry 1291: 1267:illegitimate 1265: 1263: 1243:indefinitely 1241: 1236: 1159: 1153: 1079: 1070:Pursuant to 1066: 1043: 1032: 953: 945: 937: 915: 856: 834: 827: 821: 816: 697: 685: 674: 657: 610: 601: 529: 518: 491: 473: 469:Sockpuppetry 468: 465: 443: 437: 425: 421: 390: 384: 372: 330: 324: 312: 217: 211: 199: 193: 166:illegitimate 164: 162: 142:indefinitely 140: 135: 91: 2056:MusikBot II 2048:WP:PERM/AWB 1648:accusation. 825:accusation. 2036:Apollo1203 2001:Apollo1203 1207:Apollo1203 1174:Apollo1203 407:Apollo1203 351:Apollo1203 294:Apollo1203 21:Apollo1203 2044:CheckPage 1959:courtesy. 1912:MOS:HONOR 1418:Moksha88. 1135:courtesy. 1088:MOS:HONOR 595:Moksha88. 82:if needed 65:Be polite 25:talk page 1274:reverted 1264:not for 424:. Best, 192:|reason= 173:reverted 163:not for 93:Archives 50:get help 19:This is 1935:policy. 1896:WP:Meat 1278:deleted 1270:reasons 1260:allowed 1238:blocked 1111:policy. 1072:WP:Meat 190:unblock 177:deleted 169:reasons 159:allowed 137:blocked 2034:Hello 1779:users: 1682:users: 1262:, but 955:users: 858:users: 427:KevinL 374:KevinL 314:KevinL 201:KevinL 161:, but 2016:Bbb23 1295:I am 1203:Yamla 1186:Yamla 472:I am 78:Seek 2020:talk 2005:talk 1280:. 1211:talk 1190:talk 1178:talk 435:L235 411:talk 403:L235 382:L235 355:talk 343:L235 322:L235 298:talk 232:L235 209:L235 179:. 67:and 1297:not 1276:or 1196:}} 474:not 432:aka 379:aka 319:aka 206:aka 198:. 175:or 23:'s 2052:— 2022:) 2007:) 1982:. 1976:. 1213:) 1192:) 1184:. 1158:. 1152:. 449:) 413:) 396:) 357:) 336:) 300:) 223:) 196:}} 188:{{ 48:; 2018:( 2003:( 1914:: 1500:: 1483:: 1436:: 1209:( 1188:( 1176:( 1090:: 677:: 660:: 613:: 447:c 444:· 441:t 438:· 430:( 409:( 394:c 391:· 388:t 385:· 377:( 353:( 334:c 331:· 328:t 325:· 317:( 296:( 221:c 218:· 215:t 212:· 204:( 98:1 95:: 52:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index