240:
Computer Games
Magazine is a print magazine that went defunct all the way back in 2007, so I ask that you not edit modern CGM articles into video game reception tables. I've also noticed that you've been including platform specific reviews, writing PS5:, XSX:, or PC: before each publication's review score. However, I don't think that's necessary unless there are significant differences between versions on different platforms. For example, the reception between an Xbox Series X/PS5 and a Nintendo Switch title may differ because of poor technical performance on the Switch. Or take Elden Ring, which had much more significant technical issues exclusively on PC at launch. That's when I think it's more important for you to distinguish between individual platforms on video game reception tables. Thank you!
201:
articles rarely go down, especially if it is on a website that is still in operation. Even when links to reviews do go dead, there is almost always a good archive on the
Wayback Machine. That's my stance, but if you believe that it is that important, you can add them back into the refs. Sorry about that. I wasn't really aware about the whole "preemptive archiving" thing, so I won't remove any "unnecessary archiving" in the future.
339:, I apologize for accusing you of plagiarism. However, you still should not just copy and paste the exact same thing you wrote from the Gorillaz Wiki. Can you provide the actual Wayback Machine links because I tried putting the links you provided into the Wayback Machine and got no archives. I really want to add some of this information into the article, but I can't seem to access the information to verify it. Thanks.
252:, we only include reviews in the review template only if they are cited within the text. That means that a reception section should not only include the review box and nothing else. I have seen that you have systematically included a bunch of reviews into video game articles. I want to remind you that our function here is not to serve as Metacritic where
429:
How can it be accurate information if there are no reliable, verifiable sources that support it? I'm pretty certain that most of those links are made up because, as you said yourself, you got them from ChatGPT which is known for almost always giving false or made-up links and references. I would love
353:
I can’t seem to access them either. They were originally working for on the web but now they are gone. I think I might of possibly misunderstood which interviews were on the way back machine. Apologies about that. But I got all this info from ChatGPT who provided the info with links to the interviews
140:
From MisterNerdly: Thanks for spell checking my edits to the FNaF 3 page. I appreciate it. I didn't like how the page referred to
Springtrap as "The animatronic" or as "it" since William Afton, who is Springtrap, is a he. So I tried to make the page as accurate as possible. When I have more time I'm
298:
The reason I did that is because the short descriptions should have been changed from "single by
Gorilaz and " to "single by Gorillaz featuring ". So, I removed those short descriptions because the automatic short description was the correct way. I don't know the exact rules for that (if a manual
239:
Hi! I noticed that you've been editing CGM's reviews into video game reception tables. I only recently realized this, but CGM, the website you cite online, and CGM (Computer Games
Magazine), the website Knowledge (XXG) thinks you're referring to, are two separate sites entirely. Knowledge (XXG)'s
200:
In my opinion, I believe that preemptive archiving is not necessary for articles that have a low likelihood of going down, such as most video game review articles. Of course, it's basically impossible to tell if a link is going to go down in the future, but, from what I've seen, video game review
372:
I don't think I need to explain why just because ChatGPT generated a link, it doesn't mean it's an actual link and that ChatGPT got actual verified information about the song. And the
Ultimate Guitar article seems a bit questionable, but I was able to get a few sources from the wiki
430:
to add this information and it make it more well-known if it was actually supported by reliable sources that are accessible and verifiable. Again, if you can find actual links from reliable sources that are able to be accessed, you can add the information from those sources.
108:, especially the parts about a reliable source being known for fact-checking, and about whether the author is reliable. An automated function cannot be considered a form of fact checking. With no author listed, the source is severely hampered in reliability.
493:
I reverted it because the number next to the reference number indicates what page of that source is being used in that sentence. The source is a book, so the page number is used to cite which page of the book that information was found.
299:
short description should be removed if it is automatically created). Do you know the guidelines for that? Anyways, in hindsight, I should have just edited the short descriptions to be the correct way. Apologies for the misunderstanding.
319:
Hey I just wanted to tell you that I wrote the
Gorillaz wiki origin for Gorillaz, I didn’t plagiarise so don’t accuse me. I got the information on the way back machine and those are the links. What am I supposed to do? Thanks
136:
Sorry, I now realize that that was a mistake. Most of the Five Nights at Freddy's are going to be backwards compatible for PS5, but not necessarily re-released on PS5. Same for Xbox Series X/S. I will fix that immediately.
376:
of the
Ultimate Guitar website that could be used. But none of the reliable sources that I found say that Morgan Nicholls played bass on "Feel Good Inc.". Not even his own website
149:
Hey, I see you've been going around and unnecessarily adding piped links to redirects in the infoboxes for several video games. There is no beneficial reason to do this per
41:
82:
22:
215:
Alright that makes sense. Usually I will still archive it when it's something that's brand new and so opinions might change quickly. ―
256:. We want to give an overview of the game's reception to the general public, and simply listing out the scores is not really helpful.
397:
I understand but he did mention making the bassline it’s just that the links don’t work. It was an interview by music radar
180:
483:
249:
127:
Can you kindly provide a source that supports adding multiple Five Nights at
Freddys games to next-gen categories. —
90:
253:
444:
He has been credited by Vinyl Rewind and bass buzz, both highly considered YouTubers, as the bass player man.
63:
179:, claiming it's "unnecessary archiving". May I ask why? You should probably see some of the points raised on
479:
79:
276:
150:
113:
25:
and wanted to welcome you to the
Knowledge (XXG) community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
51:
104:
If some facts on a webpage were "Auto-generated by YouTube" then they are not considered reliable per
221:
189:
154:
86:
495:
431:
384:
340:
300:
286:
261:
202:
47:
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
449:
416:
402:
374:
359:
325:
32:
158:
128:
109:
216:
184:
72:
105:
75:
by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
280:
257:
176:
445:
426:
412:
398:
369:
355:
336:
321:
487:
131:
503:
453:
439:
420:
406:
392:
363:
348:
329:
308:
292:
265:
226:
210:
194:
165:
117:
94:
183:'s talk page, but if you still think it's unnecessary then that's fine. ―
234:
248:
Hi! I am just writing here to remind you that per the instructions in
175:
Hey! I noticed that you removed some archive links from sources on
141:
going to replace the rest of the "it"s in that context with "he"s.
59:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
28:
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
235:
CGM's inclusion in video game review tables/other suggestions
275:
Please don't remove the short descriptions on articles. See
377:
383:
or "Feel Good Inc.". Just that he played the live shows.
354:
and I also got the info from an ultimate guitar article
475:
474:
Hello, can you kindly explain why did you revert this
411:You know what fine if you don’t want accurate info
8:
71:Please remember to sign your messages on
223:
191:
7:
14:
42:contributing to Knowledge (XXG)
254:we list a collection of scores
1:
44:page covers the same topics.
309:03:54, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
293:03:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
166:08:20, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
132:09:59, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
65:Volunteer at the Task Center
21:Hi ArojamDharkon! I noticed
279:for their functionality. –
271:Removing short descriptions
250:Template:video game reviews
118:03:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
100:"Auto-generated by YouTube"
95:18:03, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
520:
440:03:18, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
421:17:52, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
407:12:36, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
393:23:53, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
364:12:33, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
349:23:20, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
330:18:29, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
266:12:35, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
504:04:54, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
488:02:33, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
454:14:27, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
227:03:39, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
211:03:35, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
195:02:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
89:me after replying off my
499:
435:
388:
344:
315:Re Feel Good Inc. Origin
304:
206:
53:Get help at the Teahouse
34:Learn more about editing
470:Five Nights at Freddy's
171:"Unnecessary archiving"
123:Five Nights at Freddy's
40:Alternatively, the
181:Whoop whoop pull up
379:says he played on
23:your contributions
480:Quirino il Grande
469:
80:I dream of horses
511:
289:
283:
78:Happy editing!
68:
66:
56:
54:
37:
35:
519:
518:
514:
513:
512:
510:
509:
508:
472:
317:
287:
281:
273:
246:
244:Review template
237:
225:
224:Blaze Wolf#6545
193:
192:Blaze Wolf#6545
173:
147:
125:
122:
102:
64:
62:
52:
50:
33:
31:
19:
12:
11:
5:
517:
515:
507:
506:
471:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
409:
316:
313:
312:
311:
272:
269:
245:
242:
236:
233:
232:
231:
230:
229:
172:
169:
146:
143:
124:
121:
101:
98:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
516:
505:
501:
497:
496:ArojamDharkon
492:
491:
490:
489:
485:
481:
477:
455:
451:
447:
443:
442:
441:
437:
433:
432:ArojamDharkon
428:
424:
423:
422:
418:
414:
410:
408:
404:
400:
396:
395:
394:
390:
386:
385:ArojamDharkon
382:
378:
375:
371:
367:
366:
365:
361:
357:
352:
351:
350:
346:
342:
341:ArojamDharkon
338:
334:
333:
332:
331:
327:
323:
314:
310:
306:
302:
301:ArojamDharkon
297:
296:
295:
294:
290:
284:
278:
270:
268:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
243:
241:
228:
222:
220:
219:
214:
213:
212:
208:
204:
203:ArojamDharkon
199:
198:
197:
196:
190:
188:
187:
182:
178:
177:Pokemon Unite
170:
168:
167:
164:
163:
162:
156:
152:
144:
142:
138:
134:
133:
130:
120:
119:
115:
111:
107:
99:
97:
96:
92:
88:
84:
81:
76:
74:
69:
67:
60:
57:
55:
48:
45:
43:
38:
36:
29:
26:
24:
16:
473:
380:
318:
277:WP:SHORTDESC
274:
247:
238:
217:
185:
174:
160:
159:
151:WP:NOTBROKEN
148:
139:
135:
126:
103:
77:
70:
61:
58:
49:
46:
39:
30:
27:
20:
161:Dissident93
145:Piped links
129:Niche-gamer
110:Binksternet
93:Thank you.
381:Demon Days
218:Blaze Wolf
186:Blaze Wolf
91:talk page.
83:(Contribs)
73:talk pages
155:WP:NOPIPE
282:The Grid
258:OceanHok
17:Welcome!
446:Grlzman
427:Grlzman
413:Grlzman
399:Grlzman
373:section
370:Grlzman
356:Grlzman
337:Grlzman
322:Grlzman
85:Please
87:notify
106:WP:RS
500:talk
484:talk
476:edit
450:talk
436:talk
417:talk
403:talk
389:talk
360:talk
345:talk
326:talk
305:talk
288:talk
262:talk
207:talk
157:. ~
153:and
114:talk
291:)
502:)
486:)
478:?
452:)
438:)
419:)
405:)
391:)
362:)
347:)
328:)
307:)
264:)
209:)
116:)
498:(
482:(
448:(
434:(
425:@
415:(
401:(
387:(
368:@
358:(
343:(
335:@
324:(
303:(
285:(
260:(
205:(
112:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.