User talk:Avenue X at Cicero/Archive 3

4085:, "Policy does not prohibit users, whether registered or unregistered users, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred. The removal of material from a user page is normally taken to mean that the user has read and is aware of its contents. There is no need to keep them on display and usually users should not be forced to do so. It is often best to simply let the matter rest if the issues stop. If they do not, or they recur, then any record of past warnings and discussions can be found in the page history if ever needed, and these diffs are just as good evidence of previous matters if need" - this covers warning messages, otherwise the last sentence would be an irrelevancy and not included. Removing warning messages or blanking your own talkpage is not 4157:, but had to warn him as he just wouldn't listen. Or I could have even warned/reported him for reverting my edits for no apparent reason specified in an edit summary, or for adding that Downing has left AVFC prematurely. As far as I have known, warnings help users using semi-auto tools to report them if their vand reaches a new high and personally, being a semi-auto tool user, I have always found it easier to report users using Huggle and believe that removing warning templates misguides users who use Huggle. I didn't know about the warning part of the talk page guidelines, but now that I do, I know I would surely make a better rollbacker. 2006:

of the three aforementioned citations. If one clicks the citation that leads to Bullock's June 16 posting, one will see that on June 20 he amended it, just as I stated. Also, it is worth noting that Bullock is the primary source of all the information circulating about Anet Mook's death, and he is now being cited by the media as they report on Mook's death. The other two cources, label head Sean Organ and music writer Paul O' Connell, found out about Anet's death through Bullock, something which their respective articles on the matter state.

3476:. An editor is insisting to name his residence as "Metris, Istanbul". This person is a major club's president who's currently under investigation, but it's only recent and there's no court rule. FYI "Metris" is the name of a prison in Istanbul, Turkey. The reason he is doing this is to show the "rival president" as a criminal. Moreover I have never seen someone's residence to be named a prison. Who can I contact about this? This needs to be changed. It's really outrageous for many people. 3198: 1215: 1100: 31: 1397: 386: 1557:

while Shanti Bhushan will be the co-chairman. Shanti Bhushan was one of the original drafters of the Lokpal Bill along with Hazare, Justice N. Santosh Hegde, advocate Prashant Bhushan, and RTI activist Arvind Kejriwal. ... After accepting all the demands of Hazare, the Government of India issued a Official Gazette saying that the draft of lokpal would be made and presented in the coming monsoon session of Lok Sabha."

2620: 2129: 1170: 2949: 2875: 2801: 2727: 1936: 3120: 163: 1189:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 237: 3938: 4009:

How in God's name was it disruptive editing? Knowledge (XXG) is all about being up to date. at the time of the edit Downing was on the brink of the move to Liverpool, if someone who hadn't seen the news had looked on his page they wouldn't have been aware a medical had been completed. Once a deal had

3437:

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work.

2582:

2067:

Bullock's blog posting is reliable not because it is a blog posting, but because he is Mark Bullock, former drummer of cay. Paul O'Connell and Sean Organ are friends with him and link to the blog. Basically, we can cite and cite articles from any number of places now, but they all go back to Bullock.

1533:

It has nothing to do with the movement. A single sentence would suffice & I will add one in due course if it is not already there. I am actually pretty sure that it is already there, since it formed the reason why the hunger strike was stopped. The detail is totally irrelevant to the 2011 article

858:

3041:

In regards to the programing schedule, it's often relied upon to heavily in that editors will come out of the woodwork and try use it to verify that won't broadcast for several weeks or don't exist at all. Then you have the fact that the information is only good seven days. So you'd have keep taking

2005:

You reverted my addition to the Cay article, claiming it was unsourced. However, this is not the case. I typed my addition right before the three citations. I had typed that drummer Mark Bullock had amended his June 16 blog posting to clarify the nature of Anet Mook's death. Bullock's posting is one

1556:

The info is indeed already there, in so far as it needs to be. The article says: "The Government of India accepted the compromise formula that there be a politician chairman and an activist, non-politician Co-Chairman. It was reported that Pranab Mukherjee will be the Chairman of the draft committee

979:

You are wrong,rude,pedantic,Illiterate (Leaved?),a Stalinist,Ignorant,The cause of any fuss; I am making good-faith edits about something I have a degree of knowledge aabout and I will stand correction from those who police WP who are aviation experts, who have the wit and grace to actually clear up

1047:

I'm sure that many edits are done in several closely-timed stages: after an initial major addition returning to deal with typos, broken links &c. I find the syntax for references difficult and moreover editing it often requires saving work and editing a separate sectopn of the article. This was

4134:

the user for reverting their warnings. The reason why I warned the user was because I frquently use Huggle to report vandals on Knowledge (XXG). Since I already knew that I had given a lv 3 warning, and the two warnings I was about to issue would have him reported, I was bewildered to know that he

1330:

Hi, I had no clue were I would find advice this so i'd thought ill ask you, On the PSN network "BUCKO" is notorious for finding a corner and is widely known as one of the biggest offenders of such practices. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.40.109.76 (talk) 13:00, 17 March 2010 (UTC) found

893:

If you had bothered to read the note about my rewrite of this, you would have seen that I stated reference there: both standard works & recognisable as such. One is aalready cied in the bibliograpy: the other was about to be added. The article you have reverted to is substantially WRONG:M my

1053:

As for withdrawing my previous comment, which item on the list offends you? I would advise you to watch 'to Have and Have Not' especially the scene in which Bogart meets the character played by Lauren Bacall. It's fabulous.And I have certainly done my level best to remain civil under a certain

426:

was listed as a player, with the reference being Jim's Wiki article, but the IP reverted the edit saying that Knowledge (XXG) cannot be used as a source. But the problem is that the whole equipment section in Jim's article verifies that he is a Telecaster player. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

494:

traditionally have the family name first, and we are speaking of the birth name of a man born Hungarian. If the sentence is stating what he was "originally" called, the name should reflect the naming customs of his country of origin. The article says he grew up in Vienna, so presumably his

3133:

to create a plan for the future, find volunteers to help fill our many administrative positions, collect any feedback about what has happened in the last six months, propose some new guidelines, and see if there are any creative ideas to increase participation. We appreciate your

1514:

Alright. But I believe that the Drafting Committee thing you just merged was incorrect. I believe that the section should stay because it was a result of the movement. Even if not the whole section but some part of it in a new section or in another already existing section.

1496:

For example "Anna Hazare says no to the proposals; Prime Minister says that is stupid." might be a headline from The Hindu on 9 April 2011. Instead of using <ref name="Anna Hazare says no to the proposals; Prime Minister says that is stupid.":

4093:

that you are comfortable enough with policy to use it, you may request it back from any administrator. In the meantime, nobody who doesn't understand either talkpage policy or the definition of vandalism should be running with scissors. Regards,

1271:

deals with this somewhere & specifically says do not do it. It deals also with having extremely short subsections - basically, don't do that either. This is why I changed that stuff this morning. Could you possibly think again, please.

1331:

This comment on a disscussion page, now i know deleting comments on discussion pages is frowned upon (it is right?) but seeing this targets a person directly (albeit only using their nickname) would it be OK to remove it? Best regards,

4089:; the fact that you insist it is and the overarching dispute over blanking talkpages indicates you obviously aren't knowledgeable enough about policy to be enforcing it with semiautomated tools. I have removed your rollback access; 1492:

Hi, you could make life quite a bit easier with your choice of names for references. Instead of using a long-winded newspaper headline as the name, which makes the edit box difficult to negotiate, why not use a more specific name?

3607:

You didn't get it, all I'm saying that the changes that u made in "Mamata Banerjee", the same changes i would also like to see in those articles otherwise i would revert the changes that u made in Mamata Banerjee article. Is that

1266:

Hi, noticed your recent edits & generally have no problem. But I am unhappy about you reverting the layout of the Bill section. Using numbers for the list is undue weight because it suggests #1 is somehow superior to #5 etc.

953:. Considering that you had, all this fuss would never have happened. Because if you check the revisions, no refs or no edit summary specifying that content was added from ext. link was present. Do learn to leave an edit summary. 4260:"the fact that you insist it is and the overarching dispute over blanking talkpages indicates you obviously aren't knowledgeable enough about policy to be enforcing it with semiautomated tools" As you can see, my warnings were 4064:

I know that we are allowed to delete content from our own talk page but I'm not sure if it extends to user warnings. On a personal note, I believe that removing warnings from your own user page should be regarded as vandalism.

1131:

I have reverted your removal of the IP's addition. Other than IP bias, I fail to understand how a local newspaper fails to qualify as a source in Knowledge (XXG). I have started a discussion thread on the article in question.

582:

Sorry! I didn't know he was the author. I thought that the person who blanked the page, blanked it to remove the copyvio tag. So I restored it. FWIK, the person was about a non-notable person, so I thought I would mark it as

4233:

The "vandalism" comment is not your warnings - it's the note you made at the top of this thread. I am not questioning your assumption of good faith or dedication to enforcing policy, simply your understanding of what policy

1794:

admonishing someone to "assume good faith" is in fact assuming that they are not assuming good faith - the admonisher is ironically violating the very principle he or she is purporting to uphold, and is being

4396:

said) "On a personal note, I believe that removing warnings from your own user page is vandalism". This clearly shows both an ignorance of policy and an incompatibility between your idea of "vandalism" and

1534:

but massively relevant to the Jan Lokpal article. As it was, the latter sent people over to the former. Trust me, I am right about this and you are unlikely to find any experienced editors who disagree. -

3670:. Coloring the whole things make it more uniform and the dark grey "President's rule" thing is good. Also, if you want to change, you may change the CPI(M) colors to the colors given to the Democrats in 1275:

I'm really impressed with what you are doing generally. The article is a mess and you are putting a lot of time into sorting it out. My guess is we'll both be spending a few more hours on it yet! -

923:

Oh for crying out loud. Read the guidelines, read what I wrote on the bagshot page, and check it against the two rock-solid references. You no not need to individually cite every single statement.

559:, please note that the blanking was done (a) by the page's sole author, and (b) after the content had been tagged as a copyright violation. Thus, it would have been better to tag the page as 1350:

alright to remove comments on talk pages! Seeing that this comment is more than an year old, I suggest you ignore and move on. Also, anytime you need help, feel free to ask me, or, use the

2567: 3177:. Glad to be useful and helping out. A barnstar for me? Oh, whoa! Thank you so much! Sorry about this much belated response. I was off-line for a month. Happy editing. Cheers! -- 115:. Personally speaking I do not know what to do with the article. It is unreferenced, unformatted, no wikilinks are present, and I believe its patent non-sense. Please do the needfull. 3215: 1228: 1117: 2286:

i will find an admin if you keep on doing this. not only are you using rollback for something that is NOT vandalism, but also warning me for something that isn't vandalism as well.

1041:

I do leave notes on edits and did so in this case. It is true that I was not logged on when I made the initial edit, (a browser crash)but the note was there. It is about references.

784: 614: 1147:

You did it on the Midtown Plaza article too, and in doing so introduced a factual error. It took me 30 seconds to verify the sources. Did you make the effort before knee-jerking?

181: 2230: 1876:. As far as unreferenced, how do you reference something that did not happen? The ban has not been lifted...it's like trying to prove a negative, logically impossible. 1825:

It has not been lifted. How is stating such in the wikipedia entry unconstructive? It is a valid, notable piece of information. Please allow the information to remain.

789: 3129:. After the retirements of our first two executive coordinators, Mono and Guoguo12, WikiProject Wikify is undergoing a period of transition. We are currently holding a 173: 169: 3427: 2647:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

2156:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

3002:

If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards,

2928:

If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards,

2854:

If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards,

2780:

If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards,

2643:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 2152:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1044:

If you read the edit it was apparent that it was a good faith edit: question it certainly, but don't undo it unless you are an expert on the subject in question.

2229:

Hello... thanks for your contributions. FYI, I've reverted a few of your changes that introduced non-standard colours to some TV series article infoboxes. Per

2264:

album, I don't know what you're thinking but simply uncapitlizing instrument like they're done on ALL pages is not "unconstructive". What's wrong with you?

2433: 1989:

If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.

980:

little transgressions like this. I am surprised your page has only been vandalised twice if this is how you generally behave08:42, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

1449: 1201: 3391: 618: 447:

You aren't allowed to use wikipedia within wikipedia! wikipedias policies think that user-editable pages (such as wikis or blogs) aren't reliable!

3313: 794: 89: 3076:

Don't know about a set of objective rules mate, but you are on the right track. Except for 3-4 renames, all the renames were needed. Keep it up!

3701: 3035: 1444:

If you're interested in creating an article yourself (you can actually link it yourself by typing the name in "Search"), please take a look at

81: 76: 64: 59: 3438:

We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Knowledge (XXG) better — thanks for helping!

2977: 2903: 2829: 2755: 2583:

We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Knowledge (XXG) better — thanks for helping!

2233:, there appears to be a convention to standardize the colour of the infobox rather than introducing custom colours for each series. Cheers. -- 1964: 859:

We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Knowledge (XXG) better — thanks for helping!

172:. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by about 900 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive 2423: 3409: 2554: 258: 3130: 3263: 2293: 2271: 1877: 1826: 1727: 1671: 776: 323: 2976:

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

2902:

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

2828:

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

2754:

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

2572: 1963:

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

1360:

template if you are stuck with a WP policy/guideline etc. Also, seeing that you are fairly new to WP, I suggest you sign-up with the

4029: 1416: 996: 771: 532: 499: 405: 3092:

BTW Much appreciated if you could check for article space links , and update them when doing the rename.. I've checked the existinf

3900: 3860: 3350: 3153: 2631: 2490: 2398: 2140: 1181: 204: 4013:

Who are you to say it's disruptive editing? I wasn't posting lies or blemishing the truth, I posted the truth and sourced it.

3832: 2344:

Sincerest apologies from me. We all make mistakes. I didn't know that the letters had to be uncaped. Thank you. But, do remain

4392:. You stated, on this page, immediately at the top of this thread (and this is the second time I am having to inform you what 1445: 2393: 909:

You never provided sources. P.S.: Even if sources are present in the bibliography, you have to provide the references again.

2938: 2864: 2790: 2716: 2635:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2301: 2279: 2144:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1925: 1185:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 495:

name-change to the eventual George Szell was a multi-step process, but I don't see why noting so would not be constructive.

4010:

been completed there was no need for the bit about him completing a medical so i took it off once a deal had gone through.

3492: 2084: 2022: 4344:

warned them, I request you to restore my user right. As you can see from my contribs, I can pretty well distinguish what

2648: 2157: 1190: 4371: 4216: 4162: 4070: 3950: 3876: 3866: 3818: 3740: 3681: 3590: 3345: 3273: 3081: 3025: 2443: 47: 17: 4330:

warning a user for blanking a talk page (to quote you, :Removing warning messages or blanking your own talkpage is not

498:

It is neither offensive or controversial. It is not vandalism, or a political statement, but a good-faith correction. —

4489: 3042:

it down every time said episode broadcasts. It's best to use long term sources to help keep the information relevant.

2243: 176:

for their contributions! If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

3363: 3303: 2518: 754: 419: 38: 1756:

You are so out of clue of what to say, that you start to swear. That's why I say IP's vandalize, even talk pages.

4320:

at any level produce different results. Also, since you have removed my user right saying that it is improper of

3333: 3318: 802: 3404: 3355: 2549: 2513: 1457: 1221: 1214: 843: 573: 262: 4367: 4212: 4158: 4066: 3946: 3872: 3814: 3736: 3677: 3614:

And secondly please don't remove the "List of Chief Minister" article without any valid reason whatsoever.--

3586: 3399: 3174: 3077: 3021: 2882: 2868: 2544: 2453: 2297: 2275: 1881: 1830: 1731: 1675: 1336: 1125: 838: 327: 4467:

for any form of vandalism. What I'm trying to say is, you used a template that's meant for people who have

4017: 3480: 2289: 2267: 2072: 2010: 1570:

It needs a little tweaking, but not the detail of members etc that was in the bit I merged to elsewhere. -

984: 319: 313:

Hello if you watch this video you will see that she actually refers to herself as half Turkish Cypriot...:

4479: 4054: 2536: 766: 351: 224: 4331: 4139:

reported him at AIV and he could have been blocked. Also, I didn't warn him after after repeated reverts

4086: 3473: 3096:

ones and updated so that DASHBot and other tools don't catch the 'non-free' ones as technical orphans...

2981: 2907: 2833: 2759: 2322:

I would also ask that you remove your warnings from the user's talk page, to prevent any misconceptions.

1968: 4461: 4423: 4324: 4314: 4025: 2508: 2353: 2109: 2049: 1910: 1857: 1761: 1701: 1653: 1601: 1520: 1477: 1434: 1377: 1295: 1084: 1059: 1029: 992: 958: 928: 914: 899: 674: 631: 598: 536: 518: 503: 432: 366: 292: 248: 120: 4401:, and gives no reason for you to be allowed to use semi-automated and privileged tools and userrights. 3984: 3910: 3840: 3803: 2064: 2035: 1499:

Remember, the headline is going to show up anyway because the "title" parameter has to be filled in. -

1420: 549: 409: 4021: 3458: 3442: 3147: 3101: 3066: 2603: 2587: 1993: 879: 863: 848: 749: 442: 343: 276: 198: 144: 4472: 4050: 2960: 2886: 2812: 2738: 1947: 4406: 4284: 4274: 4243: 4195: 4185: 4113: 4099: 3293: 2403: 2261: 1803: 1453: 1429:

Can someone link the "perfect ref" so that I can add refs to an article based on "the perfect ref"

830: 820: 812: 570: 111: 3980: 3906: 3836: 3799: 2640: 2149: 2076: 2014: 4451: 4437: 4338: 4304: 4264: 4175: 3386: 2562: 2413: 2388: 1332: 1152: 1137: 709: 669: 664: 587: 563: 104: 4496: 4410: 4375: 4247: 4220: 4166: 4117: 4103: 4074: 4058: 4033: 3988: 3954: 3914: 3880: 3844: 3822: 3807: 3777: 3744: 3718: 3685: 3653: 3628: 3594: 3560: 3538: 3496: 3462: 3211: 3186: 3159: 3105: 3085: 3070: 3051: 3029: 3006: 2932: 2858: 2784: 2710: 2607: 2357: 2345: 2331: 2317: 2250: 2219: 2113: 2088: 2053: 2026: 1995: 1914: 1885: 1861: 1834: 1806: 1765: 1735: 1705: 1679: 1657: 1642: 1605: 1579: 1543: 1524: 1508: 1481: 1461: 1438: 1381: 1361: 1340: 1317: 1299: 1284: 1256: 1208: 1156: 1141: 1113: 1088: 1063: 1033: 1021: 962: 932: 918: 903: 883: 638: 602: 576: 540: 522: 507: 476: 453: 436: 370: 355: 331: 296: 280: 266: 252: 228: 209: 148: 124: 4485: 3488: 3450: 2992: 2918: 2844: 2770: 2706: 2693: 2595: 2408: 2215: 2202: 2080: 2018: 1979: 1943: 1929: 1638: 871: 689: 684: 472: 464: 347: 220: 4398: 4362: 4351: 4296: 4207: 2644: 2153: 1872: 1842: 1789: 136: 3417: 3204: 3197: 3182: 3170: 3047: 2619: 2500: 2349: 2128: 2105: 2045: 1906: 1853: 1757: 1697: 1649: 1597: 1575: 1539: 1516: 1504: 1473: 1430: 1403: 1373: 1313: 1291: 1280: 1106: 1099: 1080: 1055: 1025: 988: 954: 924: 910: 895: 807: 744: 729: 622: 594: 514: 448: 428: 392: 362: 288: 244: 116: 4471:, not for people who are editing with the guidelines of Knowledge (XXG), which include the 3126: 2965: 2891: 2817: 2743: 2661: 2170: 1952: 1723: 1268: 486:

I don't understand your (completely unexplained) reversion of my edit as "unconstructive":

3871:) Google Translate. Please hear the Hindi pronounciation and say which one sounds better. 3521: 3517: 3454: 3373: 3368: 3227: 3141: 3097: 3062: 3003: 2929: 2855: 2781: 2689: 2599: 2372: 2241: 2198: 1990: 1354: 1249: 1205: 875: 739: 679: 648: 491: 272: 192: 140: 109:

Sorry if I used this template wrongly, but I desperately need to bring admin attention to

4082: 2636: 2145: 2041: 1899: 1848: 1630: 1186: 2101:

Bullock later clarified the cause of Mook's death stating that she was struck by a train

4402: 4239: 4109: 4095: 3422: 3381: 3323: 3298: 2734: 2720: 2327: 2313: 1798: 1369: 719: 699: 2985: 2970: 2911: 2896: 2837: 2822: 2763: 2748: 1972: 1957: 1902: 3509: 3268: 2526: 2495: 2468: 2418: 1626: 1619: 1148: 1133: 734: 531:

Okay! I didn't change it back because I didn't want to step on any toes. Take care. —

3639:

Why the heck are u reverting my-edits? knowing that there's nothing wrong in that.--

2667:

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

2176:

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

488:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=George_Szell&diff=next&oldid=432648615

3735:

Good work, but lets retain the presidents rule thing to mark it out from the rest.

3513: 3484: 3446: 3278: 3248: 3243: 2808: 2794: 2702: 2591: 2463: 2448: 2211: 1634: 1469: 867: 724: 704: 468: 1396: 467:

I was brainstorming ideas and accidently deleted the page that wont happen agian--

385: 3795: 3764: 3705: 3666:

There is a small problem. The table you made doesn't look good (atleast to me),

3640: 3615: 3547: 3525: 3283: 3178: 3043: 2956: 2942: 1571: 1535: 1500: 1309: 1276: 694: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4108:

Note that I have also removed huggle access; same terms and conditions apply.

3676:

to make it more legible. Also, I'm sorry for reverting your good faith edits.

3258: 2235: 1625:

Hello. I have reverted your addition of a purely commercial external link to

1368:

to your userpage. Trust me, mentors do help!. (Even I have an amazing mentor,

1243: 825: 714: 314: 3441:

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on

3017: 2586:

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on

862:

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on

3308: 3288: 2478: 2438: 2323: 2309: 2308:

IP is right. Edits are not vandalism and the list should be uncapitalised.

418:

Can we use Knowledge (XXG) as a source? An IP is reverting edits I made on

3835:

it's . In English language pronounciation of Żagań sounds like „ja-ganj”.

3798:

on hindi Knowledge (XXG)? Only 2-4 sentences enough. I would be thankful.

3125:

Hi there! You are receiving this message because you are a participant of

3119: 162: 3328: 2531: 2458: 423: 4130:@Ironholds, thank you for qouting the relevant policy and apologies for 3230:

predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

2375:

predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

651:

predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

4135:

had removed his warnings not once, not twice, but thrice. I could have

2473: 3813:

Could you please provide the pronounciation of the name of your city?

3672: 168:

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's

3508:

Hello Avenue X at Cicero, Please take a look at these biographies

2613:

Orphaned non-free image File:The Looney Tunes Show - Title Card.png

2122:

Orphaned non-free image File:The Looney Tunes Show - Title Card.png

2065:

http://sinkofswirlingstars.blogspot.com/2011/06/anet-mook-2011.html

1726:, and now you insist on making things worse. Give it up already. 1163:

Orphaned non-free image File:The Looney Tunes Show - Characters.png

513:

Sorry, the one and only time I misread an edit summary! Apologies!

2034:#I do not understand which article you are talking about. Please 3520:, make sure that you make the necessary changes as you made in 2674:

the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click

2183:

the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click

3253: 3114: 2428: 1391: 619:

Category talk:Politicians arrested and charges with corruption

380: 157: 25: 4049:

you are allowed to delete messages on your own talk page per

2688:

If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off

2197:

If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off

3218:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3196: 2947: 2873: 2799: 2725: 2618: 2127: 1934: 1231:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1213: 1168: 1120:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1098: 3000: