Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Barkeep49

Source 📝

1321:"What happened in 1948" was vague was shown to be false as it was clearly defined in the source as "massacres and expulsions at gunpoint" "which led to over 80 per cent of the Palestinian population being violently forced to flee". What BK49 seems not to want to say is that it is easier for AE admins to treat AE as though it were WP:AN3 where simple revert-counting is normally addressed. I too was sorry to see that the complaint was not treated seriously, as the evidence presented was very clear and in the context of a larger complaint it will likely be successfully muddied. While someone could reinitiate the same case with exactly the same evidence, mentioning both user x and user y, it would have been much simpler to give a 1RR warning without falsely claiming that you were unilaterally edit-warring when there were 1052:
conversations across multiple pages that some people have significant real-world fears about restrictions on gender care. IMO those fears aren't entirely misplaced, but from the Knowledge (XXG) POV, real-world anxiety does not make for a dispassionate Wikipedian. Regardless of whether the fear is about COVID vaccines, Trump's re-election prospects, climate change, gender equality, the mess in Gaza, immigration, or any other subject, real-world anxiety consistently produces POV pushers. We have traditionally tried to address this by accepting and moderating the POV pushing. I hope that we will be able to continue doing that for GENSEX topics, but perhaps society has shifted enough over the years that it's no longer a viable model.
734:) I won't have a chance to write anything substantial till this evening. I've responded the most recent issue (the “trans kids” one) on the talk page it occurred, to try to address how that's been misrepresented. But as you note there are a lot of diffs offered, and I'm quite sure by this evening there will be other posts by other editors with 50 more diffs. I wish it was clearer which are the areas of concern you guys would like me to address, and which you've already dismissed as misinterpreted. You can email me if you think that might be kinder. -- 526: 21: 1450: 1128:
well. And so with your report there was an attempt to keep the discussion focused - which in this case was on the edit warring presented by the filer. The ask for a separate report is showing it's being taken seriously. Rather than nothing happening because it is buried as a small part of a large discussion of which it is not the focus, its own report means that conduct would be the focus.
941:
it will take me at least 24 hours to even be able to read the rest of the diffs. I'd like to have more time to view and comment on any real issues, which the most recent was not. And the mobile diffs will make it much harder to work from my (very slow) hotspot at the airport; I did not realize, for example, that
1186:
Could I file a report saying simply "In a previous AE report, I made a statement alleging misconduct by user(s) x. I was told to submit a separate report to address these concerns. Here is my statement and note that there were statements by other editors in the IOHANNVSVERVS report which are relevant
1047:
I assume that confusion (around who used the term first) is because Colin objected when a different editor used the same language, and I assume that was because it's difficult on long pages to keep track of which comment belongs to which sig, or because he had other things he needed to say about that
1282:
Sorry for missing that question earlier. I wish there was a good tutorial for learning about AE. The rules and procedures are written in the box labeled "Important information". But how to write effective AE reports is something that doesn't exist as far as I know. However, most of the advice on how
1051:
I do think sometimes that we need the equivalent of amusement park signs on some subjects. Instead of saying "You have to be at least this tall for this ride", we need one that says "If you have this much real-world anxiety about this subject, don't edit this page". It's obvious when you watch the
945:
was the first to use the term "trans kids" because of the mess of trying to view the whole page from a mobile diff with limited time. Is it possible to reinforce that the OP needs to better focus their diffs on any that are truly problematic, hopefully with non-mobile version, so that context can be
940:
BK and SFR, I don't want to clutter the AE page with my typical travelogue, but I saw the AE last night after I finished packing, am headed this morning to the airport, will be flying all day, then traveling from the airport to my destination for a family wedding, getting in late. That is, at best,
192:
22 December Went back here per Radilacs response to my first batch. WP:SPLC notes that they are reliable but their labeling shouldn't automatically be included in the LEAD. I'm curious in what circumstances Void would find it appropriate to include a gender related hate designation in the lead given
1207:
The most successful reports have specific diffs with easy to understand explanation of why those diffs present a problem - that was something the report that just closed did well. So "read a whole bunch of other stuff to find what was relevant" won't be successful. Nor would "read the statements by
1127:
Arbitration Enforcement is designed to be a board with structured discussion about editor behavior in certain (Arbcom approved) places. A problem with many Palestine-Israel reports there is that it attempts to turn it into a wide ranging discussion about many editors' behavior. AE does not do that
1149:
I don't intend to be argumentative and I'm just registering my disappointment. I have a lot of respect for the individual admins who respond at AE, but AE itself has something wrong with it. There seem to be inconsistencies with how things are done there, and I'd like to ask if there is somewhere
651:
I appreciate that background. I'm certainly familiar with the harassment of Chan. My quick googling doesn't reveal quite that same kind of harassment but does reveal a focus on the BLP violations that caused me to revdel the move logs. Can you document (perhaps best done in an email) more of that
157:
Thank you. Am I allowed to add a reply to my statement? LunaHasArrived has pointed out I've made a mistake I want to apologise for, and also I'd like to respond to the "LGBA Founders" thing because it's been kind of my white whale and I've not covered myself in glory there over the years but I've
124:? In my statement I replied to points made and incorrect claims which have been removed or edited or changed. I've already edited my statement once to account for the changing request, I don't have time to stay on top of it though. Apologies for asking here if this isn't the done thing either! 1171:
the right answer for efficiency. If someone were to file a report today that was straight forward in the way the report just closed was, there's a great chance that the total time to close both would be less than the time it takes to close the sprawled report about IntrepidContributor.
1212:
but that is just a single diff when the 3 of you are arguing a pattern and the rest are assertions without clear evidence to back them up. Someone needs to compile what the pattern of diffs are. An example of that happening for something somewhat like this is
1340:
The ask for a separate report is showing it's being taken seriously. Rather than nothing happening because it is buried as a small part of a large discussion of which it is not the focus, its own report means that conduct would be the
1076:, I don't understand what happened with the concerns of myself, Levivich and SashiRolls that filer was engaged in disruptive editing and POV pushing? It would appear these concerns were ignored and have not been addressed. Thank you, 810:
for considering my case as fairly as you can. I can only conclude that all four of you must have been terrible people in a previous life, and brought back to spend your evenings moderating the bickering of folk on the internet. --
1248:
They're not ignored, as much as there have been millions of words written on talk pages and thousands upon thousands of edits. Without a clear demonstration of what exactly the problem is its very difficult to suss out.
632:
The "singer-songwriter" draft page you just moved is the target of a long harassment campaign similar to Chris Chan. The page is pure trolling and serves no purpose except to continue that harassment.
304: 425: 296: 32: 328: 280: 1284: 1386:, looks like your edit was caught up in a revdel of material added to the Kautilya3 thread by Ms Sarah Welch. Your contributions came between the addition of the material and its removal. 1008:
Yeah, it has to load all your scripts before it knows to open the right version of the page. It's better than nothing though. Also, you reminded me to do a bit of cleanup on my common.js.
288: 996:
Thanks. That seems to work, though I can see the browser fetch the mobile page and then the desktop one after. SFN, your common.js is, em, extremely trusting of a lot of random users! --
320: 312: 1217:
which, not for nothing, was too late in a thread that had already spiraled. And yes a person can file two or three concerns in a row about similar concerns for different editors.
747:
I'm glad FFF was able to reformat the diffs for you (I was going to put them here). Also because this is at a conduct noticeboard I will be keeping my substantive comments there.
982:
will take care of that. I have that installed to keep the site from forcing me back to the horrible mobile interface randomly, but it also shifts diffs to regular desktop diffs.
1167:
I can understand why as a non-frequent participant you're not seeing it this way, but it is my sincere belief that Vanamonde's suggestion was correct: filing a seperate report
350: 336: 450: 1113:
I really don't understand how AE works. One doesn't get the impression that concerns of POV pushing are being taken seriously here. I will not be filing a separate report.
1317:
Very clear evidence was presented that user x was misrepresenting the source you provided and which he and user y repeatedly reverted. His claim that the variant on the
463: 195:
I'm happy to respond but I'm at my limit now do you still want me to? I've already added links to relevant context to two edits you mentioned I hope that's ok.
1073: 117: 1336:
What BK49 seems not to want to say is that it is easier for AE admins to treat AE as though it were WP:AN3 where simple revert-counting is normally addressed
946:
more easily viewed and discussed? I wasted what little time I had last night commenting on a mobile diff with no context that was better handled by WAID.
842:
Did we? You and I agreed, SFR was ambivalent to negative and Valereee didn't really comment on it. I'm obviously not opposed but I'm not sure it was there.
354: 176:
replies under 300 words you're fine. If this gets much larger and you need more words ask again. I hope to jump substantively to what's happening soon.
979: 541: 766:
again). There are two diffs with a "diffonly=1" flag on them, which prevents examination of the context. Could those be removed too please. --
362: 227:
thanks for your email. As chance would have it I was in possession of that information already, but I appreciate your making sure of that.
1263:
They've not been ignored? Three users reported concerns about a user's conduct but these concerns have not been responded to or addressed.
1318: 1266:"Without a clear demonstration of what exactly the problem is"? The allegations were very clear in identifying what the problem is. 345: 652:
harassment campaign? Alternatively I agree it's unlikely they'll ever be able to move from being a draft page so perhaps try MFD?
550: 1254: 1013: 987: 883: 504: 471: 389: 358: 101: 1190:
And should two or three separate reports be filed or can my concerns about the three editors be dealt with in the one report?
96: 91: 86: 81: 76: 71: 66: 61: 56: 1378: 401: 419: 407: 1048:
comment. Mixing up who said what happens all over the wiki. I really don't think anyone was trying to be unfair here.
966:
It would be really great if someone could just edit those urls to be standard diffs. Surely that's not contentious? --
395: 1214: 1250: 1009: 983: 879: 861: 799: 763: 731: 500: 482: 467: 413: 26: 666:
Yes, I removed some false information that is part of the trolling. This is very similar to Chris Chan, including
605:, with a DYK hook from 2010 and another from 2014, about his 40th birthday, appeared on his 140th birthday. - See 1468: 1364:
I was going through my contributions, and the edits I did to an AN/I hat was revdel'd. Did I do something wrong?
709: 637: 598: 580: 576: 572: 554: 246: 200: 163: 129: 1099:
indicated filing a separate report - especially given the source manipulation concerns - would be appropriate.
39: 1153:
Thank you for your time Barkeep, and know that I take seriously the warning I recieved for edit warring/1RR.
1271: 1239: 1198: 1158: 1118: 1081: 1057: 1032: 956: 618: 588: 562: 537: 466:. Maybe the standard changed, and maybe it only applies actions taken to enforce Arbcom placed sanctions. 241:
Thank you for the time you put in to assessing my case. I'll take all the constructive comments on board.
915: 869: 829: 533: 1146:(in the sense of being "overly concerned with procedure at the expense of efficiency or common sense"). 485:
I can confirm that it was intentionally changed in DS to CT from clear and substantial to clear. Best,
1209: 878:
I'm pretty ambivalent. I don't think it does much, but I didn't want to hold up a possible consensus.
1493: 705: 648: 633: 242: 224: 196: 159: 140: 125: 120:. I'm not familiar with how this plays out really - is it usually the done thing for the reporter to 525: 1458:
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can
1426: 1401: 1391: 1383: 1365: 1267: 1235: 1194: 1154: 1114: 1092: 1077: 438: 45: 1325:
people involved, counting user x (who made claims on the talk page) and user y (who did not).--
1231:
It's unfortunate that serious allegations are ignored unless certain hoops are jumped through.
1053: 1023: 947: 942: 614: 584: 558: 1234:
I'll ask again if there is somewhere I can read about the rules/procedures/etc regarding AE?
1143: 1096: 911: 893: 865: 839: 825: 807: 41: 1489: 1326: 1001: 971: 824:
Thanks for closing, I did think we had a consensus for a general reminder re: AGF though.
816: 771: 739: 1412: 1387: 1343: 1288: 1218: 1173: 1129: 1100: 897: 843: 784: 748: 691: 653: 610: 486: 451:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Change to the Functionary team
378: 337:
Local man halfway through rude reply no longer able to recall why he hates other editor
281:
WikiCup enters final round, MCDC wraps up activities, 17-year-old hoax article unmasked
228: 210: 177: 144: 803: 499:
Gotcha, thanks. I'm just glad that I didn't hallucinate asking about that somewhere.
434: 297:
Simulated Knowledge (XXG) seen as less credible than ChatGPT and Alexa in experiment
1478: 602: 667: 1208:
me, Levivich, and SashiRolls" because the one that comes closest is SashiRolls
997: 967: 812: 780: 767: 735: 704:
I put it up for a MfD, although I still think it should be speedy deleted.
43: 687: 672: 1497: 1431: 1420: 1406: 1395: 1370: 1351: 1329: 1296: 1275: 1258: 1243: 1226: 1202: 1181: 1162: 1142:
Serious allegations were made and they were ignored. That seems rather
1137: 1122: 1108: 1085: 1061: 1036: 1017: 1003: 991: 973: 960: 919: 905: 887: 873: 851: 833: 818: 792: 773: 756: 741: 713: 699: 681: 661: 641: 622: 592: 566: 508: 494: 475: 442: 366: 250: 236: 218: 204: 185: 167: 152: 133: 783:
you could delete that and make a new link you use in your response.
305:
Meet the 12 candidates running in the WMF Board of Trustees election
690:
if you think the page is better off deleted don't let me stop you.
377:
Following a request to the Committee, the CheckUser permissions of
116:
Hi, thanks for permission to go over 500 words in responding to
462:
This came up in an earlier discussion, and I finally found it.
209:
You can definitely have some additional words to reply to me.
46: 464:
Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Archive 19#Quick question
1455:
Hello, Barkeep49. Please check your email; you've got mail!
1448: 583:, the latter piece of art also pictured on the Main page. -- 896:
if you want to amend a statement to my close please do so.
143:
no they shouldn't be doing that. I've requested they stop.
289:
AI is not playing games anymore. Is Knowledge (XXG) ready?
1460: 857: 121: 613:'s 200th birthday was celebrated (a few days late). -- 1338:
is because I don't think it's true. Instead I think
532: 1150:where all the rules etc governing AE are written. 8: 910:Thank you, I will make a minimal amendment. 321:What it's like to be Wikimedian of the Year 571:Three stories related to today in memory, 524: 520: 15: 1339: 1335: 191: 1022:Thx to both, that helps, I'm off ... 980:User:Þjarkur/NeverUseMobileVersion.js 7: 1459: 1400:Oh. So I didn't do anything wrong? 668:a wiki his "fans" have put together 609:for a stunning sunrise, on the day 275: 14: 19: 860:as assent, but we can just ask 433:For the Arbitration Committee, 122:continually amend the complaint 1498:01:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 1432:15:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1421:15:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1407:14:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1396:14:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1371:12:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1352:15:37, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1330:21:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1297:23:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1276:20:22, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 1259:22:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1244:21:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1227:21:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1203:21:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1182:20:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1163:20:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1138:19:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1123:19:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1109:19:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1086:19:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1072:Regarding your closure of the 1062:20:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1037:16:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1018:14:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1004:14:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 992:14:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 978:On the topic of mobile diffs, 974:13:59, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 961:13:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 920:00:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 906:00:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 888:23:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 874:22:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 852:21:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 834:21:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 819:21:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 793:19:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 774:17:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 757:16:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 742:10:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 714:23:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 700:17:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 682:17:13, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 670:that documents his delusions. 662:17:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 642:17:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 623:11:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC) 593:20:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 567:14:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 458:Clear vs clear and substantial 373:Change to the Functionary team 251:13:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC) 193:their reluctance on these two. 1: 1444:an invitation to join a study 509:17:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC) 495:17:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC) 476:16:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC) 443:11:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC) 367:13:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC) 237:16:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC) 219:21:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC) 205:21:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC) 186:01:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC) 168:20:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 153:19:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 134:18:17, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 1464:at any time by removing the 313:A month after Wikimania 2024 601:! On display, portrayed by 599:Schoenberg's 150th birthday 1513: 1334:The reason I haven't said 359:MediaWiki message delivery 346:Read this Signpost in full 523: 1287:would also apply to AE. 1068:Question about AE report 1453: 1283:to write an effective 553:is 300 years today! = 172:Yes. If you keep your 1452: 1251:ScottishFinnishRadish 1010:ScottishFinnishRadish 984:ScottishFinnishRadish 880:ScottishFinnishRadish 800:ScottishFinnishRadish 764:ScottishFinnishRadish 732:ScottishFinnishRadish 501:ScottishFinnishRadish 483:ScottishFinnishRadish 468:ScottishFinnishRadish 430:have been restored. 798:Thank you Barkeep, 329:After the gold rush 303:News from the WMF: 1488:Have a great day! 1461:remove this notice 1454: 1319:wh-cleft structure 1074:AE report about me 272:: 4 September 2024 1379:talk page stalker 547: 546: 448:Discuss this at: 295:Recent research: 190:RE: this comment 109: 108: 1504: 1485: 1483: 1477: 1473: 1467: 1463: 1451: 1429: 1428:Babysharkboss2!! 1425:oh, ok! Thanks! 1404: 1403:Babysharkboss2!! 1382: 1368: 1367:Babysharkboss2!! 1360:Just making sure 1324: 1285:ArbCom statement 1215:this by Levivich 1187:to this report." 1029: 953: 680: 528: 521: 429: 327:Traffic report: 279:News and notes: 47: 23: 22: 16: 1512: 1511: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1486: 1481: 1475: 1471: 1469:You've got mail 1465: 1457: 1449: 1446: 1427: 1402: 1376: 1366: 1362: 1322: 1070: 1027: 951: 938: 728: 706:Helpful Raccoon 671: 649:Helpful Raccoon 634:Helpful Raccoon 630: 519: 517:September music 460: 381: 375: 370: 369: 341: 274: 243:Void if removed 225:Void if removed 197:Void if removed 160:Void if removed 141:Void if removed 126:Void if removed 114: 48: 42: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1510: 1508: 1456: 1447: 1445: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1384:Babysharkboss2 1361: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1264: 1232: 1191: 1188: 1151: 1147: 1069: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1049: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 976: 937: 934: 933: 932: 931: 930: 929: 928: 927: 926: 925: 924: 923: 922: 856:I guess I see 796: 795: 760: 759: 727: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 629: 626: 549:Per calendar, 545: 544: 530: 529: 518: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 459: 456: 455: 454: 374: 371: 342: 340: 339: 332: 331: 324: 323: 316: 315: 308: 307: 300: 299: 292: 291: 287:In the media: 284: 283: 276: 273: 267: 266: 265: 264: 263: 262: 261: 260: 259: 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 253: 113: 110: 107: 106: 105: 104: 99: 94: 89: 84: 79: 74: 69: 64: 59: 51: 50: 49: 44: 40: 38: 37: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1509: 1500: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1480: 1470: 1462: 1443: 1433: 1430: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1405: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1380: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1369: 1359: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1342: 1337: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1328: 1320: 1316: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1268:IOHANNVSVERVS 1265: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1236:IOHANNVSVERVS 1233: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1211: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1195:IOHANNVSVERVS 1192: 1189: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1170: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1155:IOHANNVSVERVS 1152: 1148: 1145: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1115:IOHANNVSVERVS 1112: 1111: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1093:IOHANNVSVERVS 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1078:IOHANNVSVERVS 1075: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1050: 1046: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1002: 999: 995: 994: 993: 989: 985: 981: 977: 975: 972: 969: 965: 964: 963: 962: 958: 954: 950: 944: 935: 921: 917: 913: 909: 908: 907: 903: 899: 895: 891: 890: 889: 885: 881: 877: 876: 875: 871: 867: 863: 859: 855: 854: 853: 849: 845: 841: 837: 836: 835: 831: 827: 823: 822: 821: 820: 817: 814: 809: 805: 801: 794: 790: 786: 782: 778: 777: 776: 775: 772: 769: 765: 758: 754: 750: 746: 745: 744: 743: 740: 737: 733: 725: 715: 711: 707: 703: 702: 701: 697: 693: 689: 685: 684: 683: 679: 677: 676: 669: 665: 664: 663: 659: 655: 650: 646: 645: 644: 643: 639: 635: 627: 625: 624: 620: 616: 612: 608: 604: 600: 595: 594: 590: 586: 582: 578: 574: 569: 568: 564: 560: 556: 552: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 522: 516: 510: 506: 502: 498: 497: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 479: 478: 477: 473: 469: 465: 457: 453: 452: 447: 446: 445: 444: 440: 436: 431: 427: 424: 421: 418: 415: 412: 409: 406: 403: 400: 397: 394: 391: 388: 385: 380: 372: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 348: 347: 338: 334: 333: 330: 326: 325: 322: 319:Serendipity: 318: 317: 314: 310: 309: 306: 302: 301: 298: 294: 293: 290: 286: 285: 282: 278: 277: 271: 268: 252: 248: 244: 240: 239: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 221: 220: 216: 212: 208: 207: 206: 202: 198: 194: 189: 188: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 170: 169: 165: 161: 156: 155: 154: 150: 146: 142: 138: 137: 136: 135: 131: 127: 123: 119: 111: 103: 100: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 68: 65: 63: 60: 58: 55: 54: 53: 52: 35: 34: 29: 28: 18: 17: 1487: 1416: 1363: 1347: 1292: 1222: 1177: 1168: 1144:bureaucratic 1133: 1104: 1071: 1054:WhatamIdoing 1024: 948: 943:WhatamIdoing 939: 901: 847: 797: 788: 761: 752: 729: 695: 674: 673: 657: 631: 615:Gerda Arendt 606: 603:Egon Schiele 596: 585:Gerda Arendt 573:11 September 570: 559:Gerda Arendt 548: 490: 461: 449: 432: 422: 416: 410: 404: 398: 392: 386: 383: 376: 344: 270:The Signpost 269: 232: 214: 181: 173: 148: 118:my AE report 115: 31: 25: 1193:Thank you, 1097:Vanamonde93 912:Vanamonde93 894:Vanamonde93 866:Vanamonde93 840:Vanamonde93 826:Vanamonde93 808:Vanamonde93 628:Attack page 402:protections 355:Unsubscribe 351:Single-page 311:Wikimania: 1490:Phoebezz22 1327:SashiRolls 936:AE, travel 414:page moves 158:moved on. 112:AE Request 1484:template. 1413:Barkeep49 1411:Correct. 1388:Folly Mox 1344:Barkeep49 1289:Barkeep49 1219:Barkeep49 1174:Barkeep49 1130:Barkeep49 1101:Barkeep49 898:Barkeep49 844:Barkeep49 785:Barkeep49 749:Barkeep49 692:Barkeep49 654:Barkeep49 597:Today is 487:Barkeep49 408:deletions 379:Barkeep49 229:Barkeep49 211:Barkeep49 178:Barkeep49 145:Barkeep49 804:Valereee 611:Bruckner 555:my story 435:Primefac 390:contribs 335:Humour: 27:Archives 1028:Georgia 952:Georgia 581:20 June 577:20 July 1341:focus. 762:(ping 730:(ping 607:places 551:BWV 78 542:places 420:rights 396:blocks 1323:three 1025:Sandy 998:Colin 968:Colin 949:Sandy 813:Colin 781:Colin 768:Colin 736:Colin 538:music 534:story 174:total 33:Index 1494:talk 1417:talk 1392:talk 1348:talk 1293:talk 1272:talk 1255:talk 1240:talk 1223:talk 1210:here 1199:talk 1178:talk 1159:talk 1134:talk 1119:talk 1105:talk 1095:as @ 1082:talk 1058:talk 1033:Talk 1014:talk 988:talk 957:Talk 916:talk 902:talk 884:talk 870:talk 858:this 848:talk 830:talk 806:and 789:talk 753:talk 710:talk 696:talk 658:talk 638:talk 619:talk 589:talk 579:and 563:talk 505:talk 491:talk 472:talk 439:talk 384:talk 363:talk 247:talk 233:talk 215:talk 201:talk 182:talk 164:talk 149:talk 130:talk 1479:ygm 1474:or 1169:was 1035:) 959:) 862:him 688:Liz 557:-- 426:RfA 1496:) 1482:}} 1476:{{ 1472:}} 1466:{{ 1419:) 1394:) 1350:) 1295:) 1274:) 1257:) 1242:) 1225:) 1201:) 1180:) 1161:) 1136:) 1121:) 1107:) 1084:) 1060:) 1016:) 990:) 918:) 904:) 886:) 872:) 864:. 850:) 832:) 802:, 791:) 755:) 726:AE 712:) 698:) 678:iz 660:) 640:) 621:) 591:) 575:, 565:) 540:· 536:· 507:) 493:) 474:) 441:) 365:) 357:* 353:* 349:* 343:* 249:) 235:) 217:) 203:) 184:) 166:) 151:) 132:) 102:10 36:) 1492:( 1415:( 1390:( 1381:) 1377:( 1346:( 1291:( 1270:( 1253:( 1238:( 1221:( 1197:( 1176:( 1157:( 1132:( 1117:( 1103:( 1091:@ 1080:( 1056:( 1031:( 1012:( 1000:° 986:( 970:° 955:( 914:( 900:( 892:@ 882:( 868:( 846:( 838:@ 828:( 815:° 787:( 779:@ 770:° 751:( 738:° 708:( 694:( 686:@ 675:L 656:( 647:@ 636:( 617:( 587:( 561:( 503:( 489:( 481:@ 470:( 437:( 428:) 423:· 417:· 411:· 405:· 399:· 393:· 387:· 382:( 361:( 245:( 231:( 223:@ 213:( 199:( 180:( 162:( 147:( 139:@ 128:( 97:9 92:8 87:7 82:6 77:5 72:4 67:3 62:2 57:1 30:(

Index

Archives
Index
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
my AE report
continually amend the complaint
Void if removed
talk
18:17, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Void if removed
Barkeep49
talk
19:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Void if removed
talk
20:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Barkeep49
talk
01:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Void if removed
talk
21:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.