1021:
that this individualās nationality is cut-and-dried, and not open to your incorrect interpretations. That is why I endorse the formula that I put in place: British nationality, followed by Home Nation birthplace. That is a sensible compromise between those that want to reflect political and legal realities, and those that want to categorise people by āculturalā or āethnicā boundaries (even though KT Tunstall isnāt culturally or ethnically
Scottish). I am amazed that a Knowledge admin is incapable of compromising to reach such a reasonable conclusion that has been accepted in comparable cases.
485:, the practice is not how you represent it at all. It is that the reason for categorising the person as such must be clear at some point in the article, but not necessarily immediately. The immediacy of the comment is dependent upon the importance and validity. Clearly, it is more important that John Stuart Mill was British than that he was born in England, and it is indisputably more valid. If if mentions (as it does) in the sidebox that he was born in "Pentonville, London, England", the nationality doesn't need to be changed.
94:
Unfortunately, he is all too often dismissed by the ignorant as "an apartheid leader", and therefore his large roles in crafting air power doctrine (and causing the RAF to be formed in the process), and helping to create both the League of
Nations and the United Nations are either minimised or completely ignored. This is both unfortunate and unfair for a man who should be recognised as probably South Africa's greatest ever statesman, in terms of how he managed to reshape the international political structure. ā
1726:
terminology of an article, I read the usage, and change or leave unchanged as appropriate. I have changed terms to 'United
Kingdom', 'Great Britain', 'British Isles', 'Kingdom of Great Britain', 'Kingdom of England', 'Kingdom of Scotland', 'The Protectorate', 'United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland', 'Kingdom of Ireland', 'Ireland', 'Republic of Ireland', 'Irish Free State', and others, and each one is precisely correct for the circumstances. However, as I made clear earlier, 'Britain' is
285:
Eire) from 1937 until the
Republic of Ireland's formation in 1949, the legal distinction was vital, as Eamon de Valera said repeatedly. The actual change to a republic forced the IFS (or Eire) to withdraw from the Commonwealth. The IFS was the only country to be forced to withdraw from the Commonwealth on the grounds that it didn't recognise the Sovereign as Head of State (the rule was changed in 1950 to allow India).
804:
countered, and that this is an encyclopaedia). Sir
Menzies made that claim only because he was appealing to the entire British electorate. Party leaders are exceptions, as they must prove themselves to be worthy trustees of the entire nation in a way that no-one else in society is. That is why the two acting leaders (Campbell and Brown), both 'Scottish', are attempting to prove with their 'British' credentials.
1702:, except as required under the GFDL. However, if you do feel some sort of paternalist urge to defend the quality of the articles that you once wrote, you ought to be happy that others are willing to improve upon your work, no matter how small that improvement is. If you reject those improvements, and do so simply because you think that you words are inherently superior, that is called vandalism.
1800:
wouldn't take too much work just to get it to FA status: add pictures, reference article thus far, create related stubs, add categories, complete succession boxes for minor positions, write post-1914 overview, detail awards, and summarise with legacy. Give me a couple of days to finish my contributions on
Luxembourg, and I'll see what little things I can do.
648:
as it is on most subjects) is more important than either a dictionary or academic definition. Since all forms of protection from libel are based upon defamatory effects, for purposes of establishing suitability, popular definitions should always be adopted over academic ones in topics that are so poorly defined.
1799:
It's not a matter of time; it's merely that I got tired of writing such a long article, seemingly with no end in sight and no-one (bar your excellent self) taking notice or making contributions. I don't think that I'd be interested in picking up with such detail. Having said that, I suppose that it
1739:
Please stop throwing around terms like "vandalism". You use the word much too freely, particularly given your own record. The point I was making was that you should treat other users with some civility and respect; they may well have made a useful contribution to this site which goes beyond pointless
1599:
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways, from comparing articles that need work to other articles you've edited, to choosing articles randomly (ensuring that all articles with cleanup tags get a chance to be cleaned up). It tries to recommend only articles that other
Wikipedians have marked as
1172:
You still haven't explained why the EU should be treated as though it is a country. Until you persuade me that the EU deserves to have parity with the UK or USA, I'm going to continue to laugh at your false analogies. And, just so you don't end up wasting your time, you'll never persuade me to that
1008:
I assume that you hold a
British passport (perhaps Iām being naĆÆve, and perhaps you hold magical English or Oxford passports instead). In my British passport, it clearly states that my nationality is āBritish citizenā. It doesnāt mention āEnglandā anywhere. Thus, the true encyclopaedic nationality
937:
It's a very common view, shared by many (though given the perplexing use of "collective" perhaps I've misunderstood your accusation. And the idea that it's silly to mention
England and Scotland is so far off the scale of normal political or cultural opinion that I find it hard to decide whether it's
871:
Many (although not most) people that know enough about KT Tunstall to make a positive contribution will have seen the ceremony. If an individual doesn't know enough of the specifics of the case, he or she shouldn't make contributions that destroy those positive contributions made by individuals that
568:
Well, look at it this way. Up to my grandparents generation, their passports described their nationality as
British, something they never described themselves as. Ireland did not in any form exist as an fully independant political entity up between 1649 and 1922, but that does not mean that the Irish
516:
But, whilst you consider me to be unreasonable, let me explain why very few reasonable people would consider JSM to have been English. First, see the two reasons that I give. Second, see the fact that his works rely heavily on the work of the philosophers of the Scottish Enlightenment, whether Hume
284:
I'm not as bothered about IFS/RoI as I am about GB/UK. However, in the case of the Irish Free State's membership of the Commonwealth, it is absolutely vital that it is technically correct in this respect. Although, as you correctly note, the IFS was a republic in all but name (the actual name being
120:
Not having any links with South Africa, nor any particular knowledge of the subject beyond the few books that I have read on it, I can only pretend to be an expert. As such, if the article remains written solely by me, there is potential for inaccuracy. If you, or another South African, would be so
1135:
Many people identify with the EU flag just as others identify with the UK or US flag. Crossing it out is just respectless. It is not in any way better to cross out a flag that represents a union of countries than just that of one country. The EU officially represents its member countries e.g. at the
1088:
Please show some respect for those who feel represented by the flag. Many Europeans identify even more with the EU than with their country. The EU has done a lot to ensure prosperity and civil liberties on a continent that had very development in its countries before. Your legitimate concerns can be
647:
that one practises, but its meaning is beside the point. Legally, besides whether or not a statement is true, the only factor that matters under US law is that of interpretation by the audience. As the audience of Knowledge is the general population, the general understanding (or misunderstanding,
587:
I appreciate that point, and my position is not that the descriptive nationality must necessarily be the same as the legal nationality. I would think it ridiculous for anyone to describe Charles Parnell as British simply because he lived only at a time when Ireland was a part of the United Kingdom,
228:
I only make changes in instances where I am technically correct (the best kind of correct). Take the two instances that you cite. Lewis-Francis runs for the UK under the wrong name at the Olympics, and would certainly do the same had there not been a balls-up with the nomenclature. The NUR was an
68:
Thanks for the thumbs up. It is quite unnerving that nobody else is interested in the article! Obviously, the date of completion depends on any future hiatus. Currently, it has 21 sections, and covers about half of Smuts' life. If I keep up the pace of writing a section a day, it'll be completed
1745:
The problem is that your changing "Britain" to "the United Kingdom" is not in any way an "improvement". It alters the meaning of a sentence, which I thought you would realise. It is ironic that someone so obsessively pedantic on the use of these terms should themselves substitute one for another as
1667:
I'm not sure that I understand your objection. The article referred to the island, which is Great Britain. According to the classical (that is, Greek) definition, 'Britain' means the British Isles. According to the modern (that is, incorrect) definition, it means the United Kingdom. Thus, it is
1238:
The UK and USA have something that the EU doesn't: sovereignty. Since the EU is not sovereign (you yourself make that clear; any country can withdraw at any time), it does not derive any respect from the patriotism of its citizens. Political unions come in all shapes and sizes, but, at the end of
1020:
Fortunately, your blind and ignorant zealotry are not mirrored by those individuals that do understand the political, historical, and legal situations. I do not advocate removing all reference to Scotland, as you have advocated removing all reference to the United Kingdom. I seek to make it clear
823:
be your concern. You wrote: "Compartmentalising against practice for other countries, against the facts of an individual's case, and against the wishes of the individual seems a tad ridiculous." I've no idea what the first part means, but the last part at least depends wholly upon a bit of trivia
682:
On the matter of the actual discussion (which is moot, because we agreed and 'won'), it is notable, for example, that there were individuals on that list that were included on the basis of their actions and/or convictions, when, if the list is defensible on any level, those criteria are ineligible.
621:
Just a tiny point, but you said on this AfD (in which I supported your call to delete) "Moreover, use of the term 'paedophile' is understood by the public to imply that the paedophile actually practises it, just as is homosexual." I am not sure you actually meant that. Do you really think that when
1291:
Again, you base your argument on a false analogy; whether the EU budget requires unanimity or not is irrelevant. Trade policy does not, because trade policy is not a national competence. In fact, it's not even a shared competence. It's an EU-only competence; the EU calls the shots, and the only
1234:
Your point on WTO representation is redundant. Whether or not the EU is a voluntary organisation, the EU's delegation at trade talks represents the EU. The deputations cannot represent the members, because the members have no control of their trade policy (whether by choice or not), and there is
1002:
of its own and whose legislature is delegated powers by a higher institution, is not a country. The common, but nonetheless pathetic medievalist, misconception that Scotland is a country is a political view that makes you oppose a fact that is as clear as day. You may regret history, the several
803:
What others infer from my comments is none of my concern; I wrote that there were reasons for the style to take that form, not that one should necessarily be acquainted with them (although that would be nice, given that my change was founded on those arguments, that the original proposal was never
668:
I know that the truth cannot be libellous (in the US), hence my reference to the importance of the truth above. However, as I pointed out in the AfD discussion, attempting to ascertain the 'truth' of a certain individual's sexual orientation, when that orientation is necessarily a thought, not an
591:
The point that I was making was not connected to imposing a nationality on an historical figure that would not have worn it comfortably. John Stuart Mill would certainly not have resented being called 'British'. If his treatment of the citizens of the United Kingdom on your side of the water was
41:
Hey, Bastin8, I've been very impressed by your work on South African history, Smuts in particular. I am doing some research on the conflict between Smuts and Gandhi. I'm particularly interested in learning what became of the Indian registration requirement from the Black Act (eff. 1 July 1907).
959:
Anyone who doesn't think that "condemned to petty medievalist separatism for all eternity" is both absurd and purple needs style lessons, at the very least. And anyone who thinks that talking of Scotland as a country is either mediƦval or separatist is politically and historically naive at best.
807:
The idea that only naturalised citizens are allowed to be known by their own nationality is disturbing, especially given that to be 'Scottish' means far more than just to be born in the area represented in the Scottish Parliament (as any Highlander resentful of Anglicisation of the Lowlands would
1200:
Countries chose to let the EU represent them at the WTO. The EU cannot force countries to do anything, they were free to choose the rules, and they are free to leave or not to join certain EU actions like the common currency. The EU is just a political entity as the UK or the US are. If you have
1015:
describing me by the name of an ancient country, three hundred years dead, would reflect neither my own life, nor my heritage. Given that, of KT Tunstallās four grandparents, two were from Ireland and two were from China, itās only sensible to apply the same principle to the article in question.
888:
No other artist at the Brit Awards made such a reference; the Kaiser Chiefs, Coldplay, James Blunt, Arctic Monkeys, Lemar, and Paul Weller all managed to accept their respective awards without gushing about their Britishness. Perhaps that's because some of them consider themselves to be English
1785:
No, really? I must say that I've appreciated the excellent work you've done on the article(s) thus far. Of course I totally understand if 'real-world' commitments mean that you can't put the work in, but please do reconsider. I'm hoping to weigh in with a few contributions, more referencing,
464:
I am one of the 50m inhabitants of 'said entity', and it's just common sense that England doesn't exist as anything more than a romantic illusion in the mind of Little Englanders. It is defensible, although incorrect, to claim that one can be Scottish (after all, Scots are afforded a different
1751:
And yes, Britain is correct. It is a real place, and a real term. It does not mean "absolutely nothing", so please don't tell me to stop using it. If you so desperately feel we should always say "Great Britain" and not "Britain", you can always raise this on the manual of style talk page. But
410:
In the absence of such a debate at AfD, please respect the existing Knowledge policies. In the case of John Stuart Mill, I actually sympathise with your UK/British edit, for the reasons you cite, but although not English by family, surely no reasonable commentator would deny that JSM was most
1725:
Oh, and don't quote my policy out of context. The reason that I don't use a bot to change terminology is because it is impossible for a bot to work out what the term is supposed to be. I, as an educated human being that knows (and cares about) the differences, can. Every time I change the
1687:
Yes, they are pedantic, and could you please stop doing it? England, Britain and United Kingdom do not all mean the same thing. When editors write an article they use specific terms for specific reasons, and they don't expect to be "corrected" by you. And please don't throw around terms like
1014:
Of course, were you trying to categorise me, out of your rank ignorance, you would put me down as āEnglishā, with absolute disregard for the facts of the case (of my four grandparents, one from each of New Zealand, Lebanon, Ireland, and Scotland, but none from England). Clearly, therefore,
946:
To accuse me of ignorance of either politics or history is risible, as is your comment on 'absurd purple prose'. Why am I not surprised that I find a member of the philosophy faculty of the University of Oxford to lash out so needlessly and childishly? Since we both value our pseudonymous
785:
Your comment seemed to imply that everyone must know what she said at an awards ceremony, which is odd (and that no Scot would talk about being proud to be British, which is also odd in the week that Ming Campbell made the same claim). Still, my own approach is always to use the nation for
517:
or Smith (although his work on Epistemology was closer to English thought). Third, witness that, as an MP, he pleaded for mercy to be shown to Ireland, for he deemed it equally as British, hence worthy of aid, as his own constituency, the most 'English' place on Earth: City and Westminster.
93:
Wow, excellent work on the Smuts article! I last checked on it a few months ago, when it was fairly short and non-notable, and the change is astounding. Like you, I also have great respect for Smuts, and I feel he is easily one of the most under-rated historical figures of the 20th century.
378:
when English, Welsh, Scottish, NI nationality is known (it is not known for some people). Apart from anything else, it means that the intro and the cats do not match, and it is Wiki policy to make the connection to all cats explicit in the article. If you dislike this system of cats
1115:
represent a country or a people on a flag doesn't make it a special case of crap. Creating a sacred cow out of the EU, and committing the sin of treating it as a country in its own right, is intolerable. Not only that, but it does no credit to the cause that you're pushing.
1066:
I would like to ask you not to cross an official flag on your user page. Imagine someone did that to yours. This is even considered a crime in many countries. I just regard that as bad manners. I am sure you are able to express your reasonable opinion in a respectful way.
80:
OK if you think it will take a month then take the time and do it. I agree it is a shame that little interest is being taken; he is a fascinating character (I did know a fair bit about him before - obviously not as much as you). When it is finished, we will nominate it.
526:. I fundamentally disagree with the description of it as a country (which you already know), but that disagreement has already been rejected on illogical grounds. Regardless, describing someone as 'English' simply because he was born in the area that used to form the
234:
There is valid debates on the virtues of UK versus GB for the period 1707-1801 and whether there should be different links for 1801-1927. However, assuming that a link to the successor state is the most useful for Wikipedians, all the edits I make are correct.
1752:"Britain" is perfectly correct, and you can check any reference. It may shock you, but the word is in everyday usage and is accepted by everyone in the world except you. If you really want to argue that it should never be used, you can start by going on to the
1707:
You are precisely correct to note that the terms don't mean the same thing, which leaves me scratching my head as to why you use them to mean the same thing. 'Britain' does not mean 'the United Kingdom'. In fact, it means absolutely nothing, being merely
1034:
Hi, you have replaced Britain with United kingdom at several places in articles to do with Indian Independence movement. India was ruled by the British East India company for 100 years and after that, directly by the Queen/King of England under the title
938:
extreme left, extreme right, or just extremely odd. Incidentally, the U.K. isn't a country, but a political unit made up of different countries. You might hold some political view that makes you regret or oppose that, but that doesn't affect the facts.
1688:"vandalism" against other users. I wrote much of the article on British cinema, and I don't appreciate being accused of vandalism by someone whose sole contribution is pointlessly changing "Britain" to "United Kingdom" to make themselves feel better.
369:
That is not in dispute. But it is standard Knowledge practice to use English, Scottish, Welsh, Northern Ireland (note: not Northern Irish - long story) on biographical articles. English, Scottish, Welsh, NI biog articles are all subcategories of
830:
That you need to distort what I said in order to make a point is something of a giveaway. That you drift off on a cloud of absurd purple prose (involving ignorance of both politics and history) helps to explain the PoV that your edit pushes.
1246:
The members gave their delegation at the WTO the power to negotiate contracts binding for them. Many decisions need unanimous decisions in the EU, e.g. the budget. The constitution, which needs unaninmous agreement, was an attempt to change
320:
I note that you seem to be on a personal crusade to purge every Englishman, Englishwoman, Scot, Welshman, Welshwoman and Northern Ireland person from the face of Knowledge. This campaign seems to be based around your novel proposition that
576:
You raise an interesting point, though for my own money I think you're sticking too much to the letter of the law, not its spirit, so to speck. Very much looking forward to seeing how this discussion develops. SlƔn, agus Bennacht Dea.
121:
kind as to read through the articles, make sure that my spelling of proper nouns is correct, my description of South African geography and contextual history is accurate, and everything else looks reasonable, I would be most grateful.
69:
in a month, although it's more likely to be six to eight weeks. The 'in-depth' section is already 6,000 words, and is almost in the top 200 articles by file size, with only three pictures; it's going to be one heck of a long article.
1106:
Some people identify with all sorts of crap. If I feel like crossing out a hammer and sickle, the Celtic FC crest, or the latest 50 Cent album cover, I'll do that. I draw a line at a country's flag, though, because that
1671:'Roman Britain' (besides the clearly unencyclopaedic use of the term 'Britain') would also be inappropriate, since the article refers to a time before the Roman conquest of Gaul, never mind the conquest of Great Britain.
199:
cover the whole of the UK, or just the British network? (I don't know, I'm just asking the question.) Usual Knowledge convention is to be flexible about the use of the two terms, unless it's obviously important - whether
1003:
centuries of a degree of unity, the several Acts of Union, and the several wars that we have fought as one, and you clearly have your own political agenda, but, as you put it so eloquently, that doesnāt affect the facts.
1761:
Oddly enough, you don't appear to have noticed that your favourite term "the United Kingdom" is itself "shorthand", which makes your arguments against other terms on the grounds of "accuracy" seem all the more absurd.
786:
nationality unless I know of a good reason not to, and to reserve "British" for naturalised citizens. Still, I don't intend to fight over it (I changed it in a more general copy-edit, not as a specific revert). --
53:
Please tell me (via my Talk Page) when you think this article is finished. I have watched it grow in the last few months and it is now a model biographical Knowledge page, which I think is worthy of being a
982:āIncidentally, the U.K. isn't a country, but a political unit made up of different countries. You might hold some political view that makes you regret or oppose that, but that doesn't affect the facts.ā
229:
amalgam of the unions of England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland, which were previously separate unions. Whether it still covers all of the British Isles (unlikely) or even NI (probably), I don't know.
1644:
No problem. At first, I didn't see anything wrong, either; I only noticed when I started pasting 'England' in place of 'Australia'. Consider that imitation to be a most sincere form of flattery.
257:
1302:
The only way how the EU representatives got the competency to decide about trade issues was by an unanimous decision of the members. You disrespect the people who feel represented by the EU flag.
808:
attest). KT Tunstall is the daughter of a Chinese woman and an Irish man, who was born in Scotland by sheer bad luck, and is, thusly, condemned to petty medievalist separatism for all eternity.
268:
128:
Sure, I'll go over it when I can, and see what I can do to make improvements. I won't be able to do much immediately though, as I'm in the middle of writing exams, but certainly after that. ā
615:
399:. If you did, I am sure that you would not be alone in your dislike of them, but I suspect that they have more supporters than detractors (who will ever know if no-one initiates the debate).
260:. I guess you are technically correct, since that is what it was called at the time, but how much of a distinction is there to be drawn between the Republic now and the Free State then?
1201:
states that form a union or countries that form a union, what difference does it make when it comes to the respect one should show for those who feel represented by the union's symbol?
588:
especially as Parnell himself would have disagree vehemently with the description. My own ancestors lived in County Cork for centuries, yet they wouldn't have anyone call them 'Irish'.
158:
and am looking for input as to whether or not it would make a good external link. I noticed that you recently edited the page and so I hoped you would be able to comment. Would you?
925:
be made to these artists' own country (the UK), as is the case for every other country's citizens. Hence the compromise proposed by the anonymous user, and the one reached regarding
1435:
264:
991:
is an independent sovereign state of the highest order, as is made clear by the article on Knowledge and by every single political scientist, every historian, and every geographer
655:
I take your point, but I also believe that under United States law (I could find the Supreme Court case if you want, but frankly I can't be bothered at the moment), the truth can
1746:
if they have the same meaning, when they obviously don't. It is also clumsy writing to constantly use three words instead of one, when the meaning is already clear and accurate.
26:
This page is an archive of my talk page up to the 3rd May 2006. If you wish to trawl something up from these discussions, please copy the relevant part and post it in the
1077:
The EU isn't a country, so crossing out its flag is just as heinous a 'crime' as crossing out the Jolly Roger. The only difference is that I prefer pirates to Eurocrats.
1039:. United Kingdom would, as you know, include Scotland and N. Ireland and these would not be considered as ruling India. Kindly revert the several changes you have made. --
763:
Thanks for reminding me, and for the new image. Had I a memory span of more than five minutes, I would have changed all that before (as I suggested in my above comment).
824:
about aa ceremony that most people didn't watch. If you don't want the implications of what you say to be picked up, perhaps you should tone down your language.
58:. I will happily nominate it, or support your self-nomination of it, when you think it is ready. Once again, stellar work to create such a thorough article.
1053:
ceased to exist in 1707, and was replaced by the United Kingdom. Thus, there was no Queen/King of England after that date. 'United Kingdom' is correct.
1295:
With respect to your second statement, I never referred to the respect that people deserve. I made reference to the respect that the EU deserves: none.
659:
be libellous or defamatory. Therefore, the truth (that "homosexual" is necessarily an orientation as opposed to necessarily a practice) cannot be libel.
494:, Cornwall, that's made quite clear, too. Actually, since the article on Ms Thomas refers to her as an "English actress", I'll edit it to make it clear.
1786:
pictures etc over the next few days so you won't be totally alone! So much has been done so far that it would be a shame for it to come to an end now.
548:" ... deemed it (Ireland) equally as British, hence worthy of aid, as his own constituency, the most 'English' place on Earth: City and Westminster."
1781:
I decided to try to boost the article on Jan Smuts to featured article status. That failed, because it bothered me that nobody took any interest.
511:
and get it over with? I think we all know the answer. Thus, why deny our country, his country, the United Kingdom, one of her greatest sons?
872:
do, and use ignorance as an excuse. Although I am not a KT Tunstall fan (by any measure whatsoever), I can make that positive contribution.
465:
status under the devolved regime). However, being 'English' simply means that one is British, but not Scottish, Welsh, or Northern Irish.
1634:
Heya, thanks for fixing the dates in the template. I am puzzled as to how I didnt notice that when I made the template a few days ago :P
750:
1470:
1460:
441:, then you may find that that opinion is not universally shared. I look forward very much to the day when someone attempts it though!--
1584:
1535:
1450:
977:
I could sum up your absolute ignorance, and, therefore, your inability to understand the very simple point with one comment of yours:
1517:
827:
Do you not think that appearing at the Brit Awards (note the title) might lead people making public speeches to say such things too?
396:
1628:
1579:
384:
1353:
I'll take a look, but I'm not promising anything. You seem to have Gibraltar pretty well covered. I know when my job is done.
1250:
So you think the respect people deserve depends on whether they have given up to withdraw from the unions they formed? Come on.
1699:
1495:
1430:
45:
I couldn't find direct contact info for you. If you could contact me directly at jharpercatoorg, I'd certainly appreciate it.
530:
is equally as absurd as calling someone a 'Midwesterner', an 'Illinoian', or a 'Chicagoan', simply because it's more precise.
353:
John Stuart Mill was British, not English. Not only was he born after England ceased to exist, but his father was Scottish.
573:
did not exist. By the same token there is no way most Kurds today would call themselves Turkish, Syrian, Iranian or Iraqi.
1009:
would be British, not English. Whatever you think of the importance of 299-year obsolete political borders, you are wrong.
1161:
The EU never represents its members. As a customs union, the European Commission sends representatives of its own single
909:
The only reference that I have made to what you have written is that of 'reserving "British" for naturalised citizens'.
296:
Fine: thanks for the reply, and for correcting the other articles. If you have not already, it may be worth you reading
196:
605:
I just wanted to compliment you on the work you've done on this article as it is fantastic, in my opinion. Keep it up!
336:
Anyway, in order to avoid on duplicating the argument around many Talk pages, I reproduce the reply to your comment at
921:
that I would be betting on a losing horse there. However, it's also best if others recognise the fact that reference
55:
855:
My implication and others' inferences are different things. I do concern myself with the former, but not the latter.
499:
Why deny England it? Because, mercifully, England's dead, and died well before JSM was born. Why not just call him
553:
This goes to the heart of the matter. JSM deemed Ireland and the Irish British. We, on the other hand, never have.
113:
Thank you very much. In my mind, there is no doubt, whatsoever, that Smuts is one of the most under-rated figures
471:
1571:
1336:
155:
1615:
1530:
1440:
388:
737:
fan instead. I'll also check the other boxes to ensure that the same problem doesn't apply to other images.
380:
371:
297:
168:
That looks like a superb external link. It is well-balanced, well-argued, and well-sourced. No arguments.
1801:
1731:
1716:
for nothing. Hence, when the use of the term appears to describe the subject country in an article about
1672:
1645:
1377:
1354:
1296:
1240:
1174:
1117:
1078:
1054:
1022:
948:
926:
809:
771:
764:
738:
684:
649:
593:
531:
286:
236:
169:
159:
122:
70:
712:
542:
Interesting line of thought you have here, Bastin8. I'll raise a few point of my own, if you don't mind:
195:. While this is useful work, are you sure that it's the right change in every case? For example, did the
1740:
and ill-informed meddling. But I can see from the tone of your reply, that this has again passed you by.
1720:, it is being used incorrectly. That is why 'United Kingdom' is preferred, and why I changed it thusly.
746:
392:
337:
31:
1604:
1420:
965:
836:
791:
475:
422:
I realise that some biog articles still say British, but they are the exception rather than the norm.
215:
Anyway, it's not a biggie, I just wanted to note the issue. Hope you continue to enjoy contributing!
1548:
1712:
for three different terms (Great Britain, the United Kingdom, and the British Isles), whilst being
1684:"many of my edits are pedantic (mostly changing 'Great Britain', 'Britain', or 'England' to 'UK')"
1465:
1344:
606:
559:" ... describing someone as 'English' simply because he was born in the area that used to form the
249:
1335:
If Jan Smuts ever gets finished, you get bored of doing it or you just want a change, a new page,
622:
someone says they are a homosexual, or gay, or like men, or whatever, that they are necessarily a
1589:
1415:
1050:
720:
716:
560:
527:
219:
201:
992:
374:. Just as you should not use a supercat if a subcat exists (or worse, both), you should not use
917:(collective) agenda. I think it silly to make any reference to 'England' or 'Scotland', but I
1753:
1455:
1303:
1251:
1202:
1137:
1090:
1068:
411:
certainly an Englishman, both by birth and culture. Why deny England one of her greatest sons?
1566:
1475:
1036:
754:
253:
27:
17:
522:
There is no need to add it there, any more than there is need to delete the article on the
1763:
1689:
1619:
1553:
1485:
1405:
1389:
1040:
961:
832:
787:
723:
forbids the use of fair use images in user pages, so I have no choice but to take it out.
578:
304:
275:
263:
If are still keen to make the change, there are another two lists that are quite similar (
1777:
Hello there. I was just idly clicking through articles and came across your user page.
901:
saying something are irrelevant, as is speculation concerning her motives in saying it.
1608:
1490:
1367:
1340:
691:
660:
634:
455:
442:
209:
192:
181:
135:
101:
82:
59:
1543:
734:
630:
216:
205:
188:
177:
1239:
the day, some are merely political unions, and some are more than that: countries.
669:
action, is an Orwellian minefield that I don't believe that Knowledge should enter.
508:
504:
354:
154:
I recently listed an external article I found on the Talk page of the article on
1793:
1766:
1692:
1638:
1635:
1622:
1410:
1370:
1347:
1306:
1254:
1205:
1140:
1093:
1071:
1043:
971:
842:
797:
757:
727:
724:
694:
663:
637:
609:
581:
458:
445:
357:
307:
278:
222:
162:
141:
107:
85:
62:
1600:
needing work. Your contributions make Knowledge better -- thanks for helping.
1790:
1507:
1425:
999:
329:. Mmmm... that remarkable insight will be news to the good editors at article
301:
272:
1525:
1480:
1445:
690:
OK I think we have on some level agreed. And as you say, we "won" as it is.
500:
130:
96:
187:
Hi there - I notice you've been going through a lot of pages and changing
1603:
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on
1561:
995:
623:
1392:
predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
437:
argument, but I suspect that if you tried adding an edit to that effect
1292:
way that members can reject EU trade deals is by firing the Commission.
988:
523:
491:
438:
330:
1756:
page and insisting they change the title to "Battle of Great Britain".
1658:
1512:
1614:
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on
592:
anything to go by, he would have rejected any tag but 'British'.
454:
Please discuss this issue before proceeding with your campaign.--
633:" is a statement of sexual orientation, not of sexual practice.
326:
300:
too to check that it deals with the technicalities properly. --
1698:
I frankly don't care that you wrote much of the article. It's
733:
Thanks for the heads-up. I can always proclaim myself to be a
947:
existences, I shall be forced to keep that answer to myself.
490:
As long as it mentions that Kristin Scott Thomas was born in
258:
List of members of the Commonwealth of Nations by date joined
711:
Sorry to edit your userpage, but I had to remove the image
269:
List of members of the Commonwealth of Nations by continent
481:
begin, "Kristin Scott Thomas is a Cornish actress..."?
1618:. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. --
1436:
List of Ambassadors and High Commissioners to Tanzania
1169:, and forces its members to abide by its trade policy.
1111:
have special meaning. However, putting a symbol that
265:
List of members of the Commonwealth of Nations by name
1700:
Knowledge's policy to reject 'ownership' of articles
333:, and to the 50 million inhabitants of said entity.
42:
Was registration repealed by the Indian Relief Act?
749:? It's in one of your userboxes. We've created
1385:Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
1235:never unanimity amongst the group of 25, anyway.
889:(Kaiser Chiefs and Paul Weller definitely do).
8:
1629:Template:Australia at the Commonwealth Games
1339:, might be of interest to you to help edit.
745:On the same topic, would you mind replacing
248:On a similar point, I saw that you changed
1668:plainly unsuitable to refer to the island.
753:as an equivalent, if you'd like. Thanks.
1661:. Possibly setting it to ]]Roman Britain
770:The problem is now, officially, fixed.
435:"... after England ceased to exist... "
150:Battle of Poitiers (1356) external link
616:AfD: List of alleged pedophiles (sic)
7:
1331:Something you might be interested in
1089:expressed without offending others.
395:) then please bulk nominate them at
244:Republic of Ireland/Irish Free State
1471:Danish colonization of the Americas
1461:David Murray, 2nd Earl of Mansfield
715:as it is used in Knowledge under a
271:) which should also be changed. --
117:, never mind just the 20th Century.
1585:History of the Republic of Ireland
1536:Demographics of the United Kingdom
1451:New Zealand Mounted Rifles Brigade
897:Speculation about the reasons for
24:
1657:Not so sure about that change to
1518:Constitutional status of Cornwall
1394:
397:Knowledge:Categories for Deletion
385:Category: Northern Ireland people
1580:British Afro-Caribbean community
1376:Thanks for your quick response.
880:Nonsense from beginning to end.
1496:Pittsburgh Theological Seminary
1431:Joshua Frederick Cockey Talbott
987:This is clearly incorrect. A
767:15:51, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
172:22:24, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
163:14:35, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
125:13:22, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
86:13:40, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
73:12:50, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
63:12:09, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
1:
1057:18:44, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
1044:16:56, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
1025:18:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
972:17:11, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
951:17:00, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
843:14:56, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
812:12:40, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
798:10:05, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
774:01:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
758:23:57, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
687:13:20, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
652:23:38, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
538:Further Thoughts on the Above
142:21:30, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
108:12:54, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
1718:Cinema of the United Kingdom
741:23:29, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
728:23:26, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
695:14:47, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
664:11:04, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
638:23:23, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
610:19:38, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
596:23:51, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
582:23:21, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
472:Category:Natives of Cornwall
459:15:09, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
446:14:44, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
358:13:48, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
212:is kind of splitting hairs.
197:National Union of Railwaymen
1730:correct, so stop using it.
1616:the SuggestBot request page
1299:20:24, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
1243:14:48, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
1165:to the WTO. It represents
308:20:42, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
289:11:08, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
1819:
1804:23:51, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
1794:21:42, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
1734:13:25, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
1693:11:52, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
1648:13:33, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
1639:15:37, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
1623:14:08, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
1611:, SuggestBot's caretaker.
1397:
1380:15:31, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
1371:15:25, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
1357:09:11, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
1348:08:10, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
1307:16:30, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
1255:20:19, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
1206:00:35, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
1030:Britain and United Kingdom
279:23:18, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
204:is the best sprinter from
1675:15:07, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
1572:National Congress (Sudan)
1501:
1337:British-Spanish relations
1177:14:25, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
1141:01:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
1120:01:21, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
1094:01:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
1081:21:31, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
1072:20:39, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
819:What your comments imply
323:"England ceased to exist"
156:Battle of Poitiers (1356)
1531:Liberalism in Luxembourg
1441:Willoughby, Warwickshire
751:this public domain image
389:Category:Scottish people
239:10:30, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
223:10:12, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
1767:18:51, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
1653:Britain: Great in AD50?
719:rationale. Knowledge's
563:is equally ... absurd."
381:Category:English people
372:Category:British people
298:Commonwealth of Nations
1605:SuggestBot's talk page
984:
707:Fair use image removal
980:
393:Category:Welsh people
338:Talk:John Stuart Mill
1421:Henry George Chauvel
913:is POV, and exposes
863:You miss the point.
713:Image:Arsenal FC.png
643:Indeed, it does not
546:1 - JSM (see above)
476:Kristin Scott Thomas
470:So, as there is the
1466:HMS Turbulent (S87)
1362:Sockpuppet template
747:Image:Kingcrown.jpg
250:Republic of Ireland
1590:Politics of Europe
1416:British Third Army
1051:Kingdom of England
629:? Of course not. "
561:Kingdom of England
528:Kingdom of England
202:Mark Lewis-Francis
1754:Battle of Britain
1597:
1596:
1456:Jeannette Charles
474:, the article on
345:== Nationality ==
37:Indian Relief Act
28:current talk page
1810:
1663:
1662:
1476:Thomas Engelmann
1395:
1366:Duly removed. --
1037:Emperor of India
968:
839:
794:
254:Irish Free State
138:
133:
104:
99:
56:Featured Article
18:User talk:Bastin
1818:
1817:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1775:
1682:
1655:
1632:
1607:. Thanks from
1554:Flag of Ireland
1486:Hisaichi Tanaka
1406:Annus mirabilis
1387:
1364:
1333:
1064:
1062:Crossing a flag
1032:
998:, which has no
966:
927:Franz Ferdinand
837:
792:
783:
721:fair use policy
709:
619:
603:
540:
318:
246:
185:
160:204.126.127.253
152:
136:
131:
102:
97:
51:
39:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1816:
1814:
1806:
1805:
1774:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1758:
1757:
1748:
1747:
1742:
1741:
1736:
1735:
1722:
1721:
1704:
1703:
1681:
1680:United Kingdom
1678:
1677:
1676:
1669:
1654:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1631:
1626:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1587:
1582:
1577:
1574:
1569:
1564:
1559:
1556:
1551:
1549:Finan McDonald
1546:
1541:
1538:
1533:
1528:
1523:
1520:
1515:
1510:
1505:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1493:
1491:Boromaratcha V
1488:
1483:
1478:
1473:
1468:
1463:
1458:
1453:
1448:
1443:
1438:
1433:
1428:
1423:
1418:
1413:
1408:
1403:
1401:
1386:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1363:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1332:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1293:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1248:
1236:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1170:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1083:
1082:
1063:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1031:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1017:
1016:
1011:
1010:
1005:
1004:
985:
978:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
895:
894:
893:
892:
891:
890:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
848:
847:
846:
845:
828:
825:
814:
813:
805:
782:
779:
778:
777:
776:
775:
743:
742:
708:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
618:
613:
607:XYaAsehShalomX
602:
599:
598:
597:
589:
566:
565:
551:
550:
539:
536:
535:
534:
519:
518:
513:
512:
509:Catuvellaunian
496:
495:
487:
486:
467:
466:
452:
451:
450:
449:
427:
426:
425:
424:
416:
415:
414:
413:
404:
403:
402:
401:
362:
361:
348:
347:
317:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
291:
290:
245:
242:
241:
240:
231:
230:
210:United Kingdom
193:United Kingdom
184:
182:United Kingdom
175:
174:
173:
151:
148:
147:
146:
145:
144:
118:
91:
90:
89:
88:
75:
74:
50:
47:
38:
35:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1815:
1803:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1792:
1787:
1783:
1782:
1778:
1772:
1768:
1765:
1760:
1759:
1755:
1750:
1749:
1744:
1743:
1738:
1737:
1733:
1729:
1724:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1714:encyclopaedic
1711:
1706:
1705:
1701:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1691:
1685:
1679:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1660:
1652:
1647:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1637:
1630:
1627:
1625:
1624:
1621:
1617:
1612:
1610:
1606:
1601:
1591:
1588:
1586:
1583:
1581:
1578:
1575:
1573:
1570:
1568:
1565:
1563:
1560:
1557:
1555:
1552:
1550:
1547:
1545:
1544:Interleukin 6
1542:
1539:
1537:
1534:
1532:
1529:
1527:
1524:
1521:
1519:
1516:
1514:
1511:
1509:
1506:
1503:
1502:
1497:
1494:
1492:
1489:
1487:
1484:
1482:
1479:
1477:
1474:
1472:
1469:
1467:
1464:
1462:
1459:
1457:
1454:
1452:
1449:
1447:
1444:
1442:
1439:
1437:
1434:
1432:
1429:
1427:
1424:
1422:
1419:
1417:
1414:
1412:
1409:
1407:
1404:
1402:
1399:
1398:
1396:
1393:
1391:
1384:
1379:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1369:
1361:
1356:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1330:
1308:
1305:
1301:
1300:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1256:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1244:
1242:
1237:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1207:
1204:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1176:
1171:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1142:
1139:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1119:
1114:
1110:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1095:
1092:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1070:
1061:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1042:
1038:
1029:
1024:
1019:
1018:
1013:
1012:
1007:
1006:
1001:
997:
993:
990:
986:
983:
979:
976:
975:
974:
973:
969:
963:
950:
945:
944:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
928:
924:
920:
916:
912:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
900:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
844:
840:
834:
829:
826:
822:
818:
817:
816:
815:
811:
806:
802:
801:
800:
799:
795:
789:
780:
773:
769:
768:
766:
762:
761:
760:
759:
756:
752:
748:
740:
736:
732:
731:
730:
729:
726:
722:
718:
714:
706:
696:
693:
689:
688:
686:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
667:
666:
665:
662:
658:
654:
653:
651:
646:
642:
641:
640:
639:
636:
632:
628:
626:
617:
614:
612:
611:
608:
600:
595:
590:
586:
585:
584:
583:
580:
574:
572:
564:
562:
556:
555:
554:
549:
545:
544:
543:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
520:
515:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
497:
493:
489:
488:
484:
480:
477:
473:
469:
468:
463:
462:
461:
460:
457:
448:
447:
444:
440:
434:
431:
430:
429:
428:
423:
420:
419:
418:
417:
412:
408:
407:
406:
405:
400:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
375:
373:
366:
365:
364:
363:
360:
359:
356:
350:
349:
346:
343:
342:
341:
339:
334:
332:
328:
324:
316:Please Desist
315:
309:
306:
303:
299:
295:
294:
293:
292:
288:
283:
282:
281:
280:
277:
274:
270:
266:
261:
259:
255:
251:
243:
238:
233:
232:
227:
226:
225:
224:
221:
218:
213:
211:
207:
206:Great Britain
203:
198:
194:
190:
189:Great Britain
183:
179:
178:Great Britain
176:
171:
167:
166:
165:
164:
161:
157:
149:
143:
140:
139:
134:
127:
126:
124:
119:
116:
112:
111:
110:
109:
106:
105:
100:
87:
84:
79:
78:
77:
76:
72:
67:
66:
65:
64:
61:
57:
48:
46:
43:
36:
34:
33:
29:
19:
1788:
1784:
1780:
1779:
1776:
1727:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1686:
1683:
1656:
1633:
1613:
1602:
1598:
1388:
1365:
1334:
1304:ROGNNTUDJUU!
1252:ROGNNTUDJUU!
1203:ROGNNTUDJUU!
1166:
1163:trade policy
1162:
1138:ROGNNTUDJUU!
1112:
1108:
1091:ROGNNTUDJUU!
1069:ROGNNTUDJUU!
1065:
1033:
981:
958:
936:
922:
918:
914:
910:
898:
896:
879:
862:
820:
784:
744:
710:
656:
644:
624:
620:
604:
575:
570:
567:
558:
552:
547:
541:
501:Middle-Saxon
482:
478:
453:
436:
433:I like your
432:
421:
409:
377:
368:
352:
344:
335:
322:
319:
262:
247:
214:
186:
153:
129:
114:
95:
92:
52:
44:
40:
25:
1540:Add Sources
1411:No. 714 NAS
781:KT Tunstall
755:Chick Bowen
115:of all time
1620:SuggestBot
1508:Padma Shri
1426:Micronesia
1390:SuggestBot
1041:Gurubrahma
1000:government
967:ĪĪµĪ» ĪĻĪ·ĻĪ·Ļ
962:Mel Etitis
838:ĪĪµĪ» ĪĻĪ·ĻĪ·Ļ
833:Mel Etitis
793:ĪĪµĪ» ĪĻĪ·ĻĪ·Ļ
788:Mel Etitis
631:Homosexual
627:homosexual
625:practising
579:Fergananim
1789:Regards,
1710:shorthand
1609:ForteTuba
1526:Even Flow
1481:Harmattan
1446:Chris Hoy
1368:Mais oui!
1341:Batmanand
994:. Thus,
692:Batmanand
661:Batmanand
635:Batmanand
601:Jan Smuts
456:Mais oui!
443:Mais oui!
83:Batmanand
60:Batmanand
49:Jan Smuts
1562:Mr. Plod
1173:effect.
996:Scotland
735:Linfield
717:fair use
483:Actually
217:sjorford
1567:Junsado
1504:Cleanup
1113:doesn't
989:country
919:concede
524:Midwest
492:Redruth
376:British
355:Bastin8
331:England
208:or the
1802:Bastin
1732:Bastin
1673:Bastin
1659:Exeter
1646:Bastin
1636:Remy B
1576:Expand
1558:Wikify
1513:Arawak
1378:Bastin
1355:Bastin
1297:Bastin
1241:Bastin
1175:Bastin
1167:itself
1118:Bastin
1079:Bastin
1055:Bastin
1023:Bastin
949:Bastin
821:should
810:Bastin
772:Bastin
765:Bastin
739:Bastin
725:Qwghlm
685:Bastin
650:Bastin
594:Bastin
571:nation
532:Bastin
305:(Talk)
287:Bastin
276:(Talk)
237:Bastin
170:Bastin
123:Bastin
71:Bastin
32:Bastin
1791:Xdamr
1773:Smuts
1728:never
1522:Merge
1400:Stubs
1247:this.
1136:WTO.
657:never
507:, or
505:Roman
302:ALoan
273:ALoan
16:<
1345:Talk
1109:does
1049:The
923:must
915:your
911:That
645:mean
557:2 -
479:must
439:here
351:You:
327:1707
267:and
899:not
367:Me:
325:in
256:on
252:to
220:āā¢ā
191:to
132:Imp
98:Imp
1764:JW
1690:JW
1343:|
970:)
960:--
841:)
831:--
796:)
503:,
391:,
387:,
383:,
340::
30:.
964:(
929:.
835:(
790:(
379:(
180:/
137:i
103:i
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.