User talk:BashBrannigan

1544:

people. Perhaps it started out as an attempt to taste completely authentic (much more likely) and the proper ingredients were not available, then over time the makers lost their own taste memory of Chinese food, or even the Chinese makers of the food developed Americanized tastes. Innovation in new dishes takes place all over the world, as does the copying of inventions, saying that some chinese origin people living in the US created General Tso's Chicken and American people like the way it tastes is not at all saying that American Chinese food is designed to appeal to American taste except in a tautological sense. As another example, taste a home cooked or specialty hamburger cooked nicely to a McDonald's hamburger. You're going to claim that the McDonald's hamburger was designed for American tastes? The McDonald's hamburger is more roughly equivalent to dumbed down taste of American Chinese food, but it's lazy original research to claim that it was designed to appeal to Amercian tastes. Not picking a fight, but you get my point? I don't think the encylopedia should just repeat common wisdom that has no basis.

1504:-- my comment on the Steve Jobs page is not a joke. 'Steve Jobs' is a business celebrity figure-- he is also now dead. I have never meet Steve Jobs and to be honest his name sounds a little 'made-up'-- I am lead to consider the possibility that his death may be the conclusion of an experiment on the part of Apple's Board of Directors. Business celebrities are not enshrined in the same way in which famous historical figures are-- just as we are unlikely to honor every 19th century double-A ball-player with his own 400k page, there is no real reason to preserve 'business celebrity' pages, unless we are interested in creating accounts for every executive-manager at Home Depot and Subway as well. There must be a 'moratorium' on such page-- there is no formal policy and a formal policy must be developed. Why does it seem like I am joking? 307:

to the ideas of somatotopic and topographic maps which describe the neural circuitry of the brain. While the authors of the book did describe this idea, they never followed up on it with any peer-reviewed publications, hence the phrase: "were not able to prove this idea with research". Therefore, they only deserve the credit for first imagining this idea as philosophers. Many neurologists since have figured out that a similar concept does exist in terms of motor and sensory memory. It is important to have that excerpt as a part of the Consciousness article; it contains information on the philosophical beginnings of an actual scientific fact.

340:. Allow me to explain, I had earlier done redirect fixes on various ice hockey articles but was then told to stop. At some point we will return to the (ice hockey) dab in defenceman and my edits caused them to have more work done than normal, so by reverting it, it saved less hassle. Hope this clears everything up, I've already been told off about it twice and to be honest I wish I hadn't have started it. I appriciate your help all the same and understand where you come from with your revert, it was my original intention to edit all redirects but I believe it's a good idea not to fix redirects unless there are broken. 988: 407: 162: 3090: 2070: 815: 563: 2402: 3000: 2912: 2837: 2764: 2648: 1340: 439: 743:), have a consciousness-changing effect" was uncited, even when it didn't have caffeine in the list. All I did was add another psychoactive drug to the list that was provided as to avoid confusion, as psychoactive drugs by definition change consciousness (caffeine, cannabis, cocaine, nicotine, ect.). This is not original research, I was only adding to what was there. 2258: 1883: 638:

times and so I'm grateful that there are experts out there, like yourself, in addition to the written information, that can help novices like myself. I don't want to feel like I'm imposing on you. I was asked to do this (by a media director) and I will do this. I hope that you can be patient with me!:) thankyou,--

1840:

However, my comment on the Steve Jobs page was to "shut down" editors from getting into an exchange of personal opinions. Editors opinions on whether Jobs is an inventor are irrelevant. My opinion on the Genovese article was that it broke Knowledge policy (by being racist). Editors opinions are valid

306:

I understand that I may not be of the same "stature" as some of the other editors, but that is simply because I am new. As for the words being "amateurish", I do not quite understand the claim. There seems to be nothing amateurish about the holographic representation of consciousness and its relation

3102:

Hiya, Bash! Just wanted to leave my appreciation for your entry about Joe Weber, who is my third great uncle. I've done some research into Weber over the past few years and I thought you did a nice job. I say this not just as a relative, but as a journalist and professor who appreciates good history

1561:

Knowledge can only use content from published sources. Ultimate truth is secondary and even irrelevant when not supported by reliable sources. You admit yourself "said in many books and articles" which is justification for it being in Knowledge. If you can find your viewpoint expressed in published

501:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page

254:

I saw you asked about this website's reliability. Seoul Sisters is very good for learning background information about any of the South Korean golfers or Korean American golfers. It will tell when they turn pro, any junior achievements they have, and what they done since turning pro. Birth dates are

2080:

case still awaiting comments and replies. If this dispute has not been resolved to the satisfaction of the filing editor and all involved parties and no further comment is made at the opened filing, it may be failed and suggested that the next logical course of action be request for comment. Please

1624:

I'm sorry, but you don't understand that you're simply expressing opinion and right or wrong it's irrelevant. The entire article is weak on sources, not just that statement, but if necessary I could add a multitude of sources supporting the current content. I can assure you, unless you provide some

1156:

Thanks so much Bash. I will follow your advice and add to Australian films of 1983; however when I write a separate and extended entry page for the film (in a couple of weeks) can I send it to you for a check first? Also, I am a film and video valuer for archives and libraries here in Australia

1026:

Hi, Bash. Just wanted you to know that I was shocked as you to see that someone had changed verbatim quotes. I had caught something in the lead that had removed Ditko as co-creator, and fixed that. I had no idea someone had done it throughout the article. Good catch -- you have a better eye than I!

1862:

I normally consider psychotherapy to be bs, but sounds like you got a good one (therapist). No interest in the Genovese case ATM, but whether or not Jobs invented anything is a flat fact, not an opinion. An example of an opinon, for contrast, would be whether or not he died because he was an idiot

1595:

Let's make it simpler, all food that sells in America is catering to American tastes. Restauranteurs drop items that don't sell, and keep those that do. All food in America caters to American tastes by definition. I don't doubt you agree with it, it's a tautology. If it's supported by sources, add

1543:

Where is a shred of evidence that American Chinese food was designed to appeal to American tastes, other than that it is sold to Americans? I am aware that it's common to say it, and it said in many books and articles, but people saying it and believing it does not make it true, even distinguished

1264:

This is also wrong because majority Dravidians are in south India and not in the north. There is no proof that before so called Aryans there was Dravidians because Dravidian is not race but related to language and it doesnt go beyond c.500 BCE. But Aryan migration is said to have happenned around

1256:

This statement is wrong because the theory is about Aryan migration and Hindu castes that exists today whether Brahmins or Kshatriyas are all of mixed race and not the alledged original migrant race. This is also not the basis for caste division because castes in india is very complicated division

384:

There isn't an approved style in WikiProject Chess. I've seen both. I was also confused by "5.0-0" (interpreting the "5.0" to be some kind of "release number" or some such thing. I think I looked at it five times at least, puzzled, until finally seeing it represent a chess move!). I'd like to

1576:

if "the world is flat" appeared in many books, would you just put it in wikipedia? Because many books do say that "a wife is the property of her husband." I'm not advocating changing the rules of wikipedia, or breaking them, I'm not advocating putting a novel theory into wikipedia. I'm arguing to

368:

I wanted to apologize for the mis-correction I introduced. When I read "Fischer's lifetime score in tournament and match games with 5.0-0 was six wins, three draws, and no losses (83.3%)." I took the 5.0-0 to be a score (albeit oddly presented) rather than a move (O-O). Of course, I should have

2184:

that covers a very broad topic in very limited space should try to stick to sources that are very well known -- books that are known to every expert on the topic. A book that was published this week and is only available in a Kindle version doesn't come anywhere close to meeting that criterion.

637:

Don't be angry please. i am new at this and I do apologize as I don't mean to be "A PAIN!" as you so eloquently stated. Please give me a little leaway here. You're an expert at this and I know that it's second nature to you. However, I'm new. I've read a lot on this site. It's confusing at

302:

Hello, thank you for editing the post on consciousness. I am new to Knowledge and am still getting used to it. I did not think that my changes were completely irrelevant and should be removed. As for the suggestions you had, I hope the following explanation clarifies my position regarding these

1748:

When things become frustrating it is the determined and correct who prevail. I find the dispute not only frustrating but in very poor taste. So I am maintaining a quiet, determined, and professional presence. I will not get drawn in to discussions on it and am simply insisting in citations.

2776:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1274:

Do you think that anyone can include absurd info into any article and simply tag it as unreferenced. Simply tagging wrong information doesnt make it right. So before you revert see what you are doing. If you dont know let others do it. Please change it. Sorry for long comment. Thanks.

2849:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1577:

take a novel theory out of wikipedia, it is not necessary for wikipedia to repeat an old wives tale no matter how widespread it is. If you don't want to take it out, the assertion could be weakened with "many sources suggest that American Chinese food was made to American tastes"

2377:

Thanks for creating the WP article on John, who was my Ph.D. thesis advisor. I was unaware that he'd died recently, and now that he's gone, I'll see what I can do to add significantly to his article. He certainly met all reasonable standards for notability in his field. --

1653:

Problem was that the automation was giving an incorrect rating. If you clicked the link, the link it took you to her profile which said 2705, but the automation was drawing 2698. However now that I look at it I see that there's a conflict between FIDEs Top 100 Players

1046:

Steve is currently in the final stages of terminal cancer. He is no longer taking cancer treatment, and is medicating with pain-killers while enjoying his final chapter. The section I added simply reported that Steve's is in the death-zone as he has made us aware.

203:

Even though youtube is not a reliable source, I was wondering if it be ok to mention that there exists a video out there that suggests so and so... and that the video can be found on youtube and NOW Magazine, without saying that it is official surveillance footage.

2123:

I removed it because I was unable to verify the notability of the author of the book. Just having written does not establish your importance. anyone can write a book. I googled the author and could find nothing to indicate his being significant or his credentials.

1157:(and lecturer in documentary film at UTS). I notice there's few entries in Knowledge about independent filmmaking practice/history in Australia, or feminist filmmaking history. Can I create pages on these topics? I have published in this area in Australia. Jeni 1686:, but I'm unsure whether you have made a substantive statement within it about your own opinion. Forgive me if I have simply missed it. I am not seeking to influence what you say, just seeking to ensure that you say it explicitly as part of the RFC itself. 766:

guidelines. Either remove the whole paragraph or do nothing at all, because that entire paragraph is un-sourced, and to date you have not been able to find good reason why thc should be on the list while caffeine shouldn't, when the thc claim is unsourced.

2660:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

2741:

that said, with no citation, that there was no "Maple Leaf Regiment" in World War I. Until today, though, the page claimed (falsely) that there was such a regiment. I removed that, and started a talk-page discussion. Would you like to weigh in?

453:, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 1207:

Hi, regarding the edit by Oliver9909 you reverted, I agree that it does not belong, but please note that I had already started a discussion of the issue on the article's talk page -- it might be useful for you to comment there. Regards,

78:

and make the change to condense the section. If anyone objects to it then it can be discussed at article talk. Be sure to put an explanation of your condensation in your edit summary to clarify that the length of the section was placing

503: 1132:

and made it one of our best chess biographies. I know it's been a struggle. For some reason that article is a magnet for drive-by editors who don't have enough experience with chess to make good judgments. Another example is

2209:

Only you're a pusscake, so you cry waa waa racism is disgusting - well you know what, if racism is so horrible why don't you support the idea of different races having different nations, as is natural? End the hate, separate.

1717:

That wasn't what I meant. Please don't think I'm being critical of you. I understand your comment completely. I think, simply, that an explicit comment as a direct answer to the RFC from you is a useful thing to have as well.

73:

Hi, in answer to your two questions: 1) yes in preview footnotes will number themselves from without the rest of the article to pull them together. When you save they will appear in the correct sequence. 2) Yes, feel free to

1591:

Let's make it simple, I agree with what is currently in the article and it is supported by sources. Your assertion that American Cinese Food wasn't designed to cater to American tastes is wrong. 22:03, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

2205:

Don't be so mad, mang. Racist is a Communist buzzword coined by Marxist Jew Leon Trotsky to silence, arrest and torture his political opponents. These days it's used in the same way, to silence opposition to the left.

1103:'s message to me on his talk page explaining what I was taking issue with, so to keep it short (it's well after 3am here in Chicago), and provided you're interetsd in reading it, I'll just direct you to his talk page 2603:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 3043: 2955: 2877: 2804: 2688: 1260:

2)"The other Hindu castes spread around various parts of India (North or South), like the Vaishyas, Shudras and the Dalits are ethnic Dravidians though in the North, they may now speak Indo-Aryan languages".

1252:

1)"There are however some high caste hindus such as the Brahmins and Kshatriya in North India who are originally from central Asia and have settled in the North. This has been the basis of Caste division."

697:, that is a drug that alters the central nervous system, much like nicotine does. . That list includes the mentioned psychoactive drugs without citation btw. Please do not remove helpful edits. Thank you. 258:

SS is definitely a cheerleader for these golfers, but for gleaning data to include in wikipedia entries, it's a good source. I'd say a 9 on the 10 point scale. I've used it to build wikipedia entries on

1893:

regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is

1249:

You have reverted recent edits to "Aryan Migration theory" saying that it is tagged, but you should know that simply tagging wrong info doesnt means it is right. For example look at what you reverted:

3027:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2939:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2861:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2788:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2672:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1636:

Hi Bash, I noticed you took the FideID= i.d. no. off from Judit's article, I thought this was the direction ProjChess wanted to go (automated rating updates), can u help me understand? Thx!

310:

I look forward to your next review/suggestions regarding this post. I hope we can figure out a solution where this information is added, but also written in a concise, less amateur way.

3013: 2925: 2034: 793:

for GA. Considering that you were the one who made the article what it was, I give all credit to you for it when it passes; all I've done here was get it through the process.

2718:

Some misogynist fascist has added Polgar's record against Kasparov to her article. Please remove that factual information ASAP, otherwise civilization as we know it may end.

1895: 2456: 462: 1362:

very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the

1789:

Please keep your accusations of racism to yourself, and get a consensus before you remove long-standing material from an article when the removal is disputed. Thanks.

1924: 2081:

take a moment to add a note about this at the discussion so that a volunteer may close the case as "Failed". If the dispute is still ongoing, please add your input.

1979:

It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.

592:, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at 1863:

and failed to take appropriate action early in his illness. That's an opinion. Whether or not he invented anything is an objective fact, like his being dead.

842:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

2038: 1940:

discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.

838:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 2479:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1420: 1625:

very compelling sourced material, it wont be removed. I can't continue this debate, because it's not relevant to Knowledge.. 22:24, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

2528: 1598:

Restauranteurs who make authentic Chinese food are catering to American tastes if it sells well, please go add that to every single wikipedia article.

2077: 1890: 1001: 420: 175: 2162:

By the way, would you please state what are your criteria for notability? Google search? Did you check in the book and see the references there?

125:

of looking at what you've done and intended to post comments about it afterward. I'll get back to you on the article talk page in a few minutes!

428: 2524: 1416: 3066: 2977: 2891: 2818: 2702: 2628: 1864: 1825: 744: 698: 2518: 2466: 2567: 2217: 1605: 1578: 1545: 1393: 1186: 1176:

The quote fragment "Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government" is also verified Here:

941: 2514: 1276: 1063: 2476: 1806:

I started the RFC, so it's you who is editing without consensus. I have a right to ask if its racism and will not keep it to myself

1379: 385:

see WikiProject Chess adopt like in the Yugoslav publications (i.e., the space). If we were both confused, it can't be a fluke.

3062: 2973: 2887: 2814: 2698: 2624: 1271:

Why does one use Hindutva here. This is a political term and not acceptable to all because it is used in wrong sense in India.

972: 493: 283: 2521:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1973: 1415:

BLPPROD tags can be restored if no sources can be found, and because we don't have a confirmed death date I will do so now.

1374: 1363: 1347: 934: 522: 369:

noted that 6+3 didn't add up to 5! A space after the "5." would have helped, but apparently, that isn't the approved style.

3103:

and good writing. If you're interested in some more information (and citations) about him, I'm happy to pass them along.

487: 446: 432: 3036: 2948: 2870: 2797: 2681: 2020: 1137:

which every so often will get bogged down with complaints that "castle" isn't give the proper respect in that article.

40: 2615:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3048: 2960: 2882: 2809: 2693: 2620: 1683: 830:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 608: 466: 826: 711:

Wrong. First of all, before you try to revert my edits keep in mind that the whole statement ."Wake-up drugs such as

2480: 2462: 2408: 2383: 1767:

I just wanted to thank you for commenting there. That we disagree is unimportant. That you commented is important.

1325: 968: 843: 2563: 612: 578: 1868: 1829: 1783: 1641: 1469: 748: 702: 390: 2505:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1609: 1582: 1549: 1378:

may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a

2281:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

2221: 2086: 1794: 1190: 1162: 1112: 949: 798: 585: 145: 130: 1293:

No idea what this first-time editor is talking about. I never reverted, only tagged unreferenced material.

2401: 1280: 1235: 1059: 593: 507: 3108: 3024: 2936: 2858: 2785: 2669: 2413: 2379: 1937: 1385:

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is

1321: 1077:

The above is complete BS. Editor had added POV material with sources which didn't support the material.

1012: 994: 987: 1055: 964: 944:

about the "maximum moves" position. I agree it is out of place and should be removed from the article.

577:

on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a

1838:

I'm detestable and immature? OMG, my therapist has been saying the same thing! I hope it's not true!!

1456:

in order to make it plural rather than singular and there shouldn't have been an apostrophe at all in

1008: 2361: 2213: 1703:

I felt the editor was misrepresenting fact of the RFC and needed to clarify. It wasn't done lightly.

1601: 1359: 1182: 1104: 1051: 772: 724: 623: 458: 315: 311: 271: 240: 967:) to AIV, earning him/her a weeklong block for disruptive editing. Just thought you should know. ~~ 618:

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

3104: 2738: 2723: 2616: 2337:

Heggade) and so on, at various levels of administration and apart from administrative duties the ''

2055: 2013: 1962: 1637: 1465: 679: 589: 574: 413: 406: 386: 356: 279: 56: 2308:

and others propose a derivation from the Sanskrit - ''go'' (cow) and ''govala'' (cowherd) (Govala-

1734:

OK, I will do that. I'm afraid I've found this dispute rather frustrating. Thanks for clarifying.

1436:

BashBrannigan, I couldn't help noticing two bizarre grammatical errors in your recent addition to

1268:

3)"Hindutva (Hindu nationalist) organizations, especially, mostly remain opposed to the concept."

2574: 2235: 2190: 2166: 2149: 2125: 2107: 2082: 1990: 1842: 1807: 1790: 1772: 1754: 1735: 1723: 1704: 1691: 1661: 1563: 1522: 1483: 1401: 1294: 1213: 1158: 1108: 1078: 1032: 945: 924: 794: 516: 186: 168: 161: 141: 126: 2037:, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located 472:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

3007: 2919: 2845: 2772: 2747: 2656: 2638: 2592: 2583: 2544: 2325:

vested power in the ''Ooru Gauda'',''Nadu Gauda'', ''Pergade'' (archaic for ''Hegde''.Pergade-

1509: 1460:. I hope you haven't included apostrophes to mark plurals elsewhere in the encyclopaedia. See 1437: 1231: 1134: 901: 888: 790: 782: 694: 643: 374: 333: 232: 217: 36: 1513: 683: 3055: 3020: 2967: 2932: 2854: 2781: 2665: 2612: 2596: 2492: 2429: 2420: 2371: 2170: 2153: 2111: 1695: 1318: 835: 814: 345: 107: 88: 75: 3035:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2947:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2869:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2796:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2680:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2611:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1116: 2357: 2353: 2262: 1950:

It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about

1142: 1100: 884: 768: 619: 548: 477: 236: 80: 2009:. Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion. 1129: 1122: 540: 533: 134: 3089: 2103:

Would you please explain why my contribution is removed, so I can correct the problems?

1889:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

1824:

you're trying to shut down discussion. You're coming across as detestable and immature.

3032: 2944: 2866: 2793: 2719: 2677: 2608: 2600: 2051: 1998: 1994: 839: 675: 600: 275: 111: 44: 32: 2459:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 2050:

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! --

1464:. One would expect the highest standard of spelling and grammar in an encyclopaedia. ( 3028: 2940: 2862: 2789: 2673: 2604: 2571: 2535:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

2186: 2181: 2006: 1768: 1750: 1719: 1687: 1397: 1368: 1209: 1201: 1028: 920: 856: 604: 511: 491:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 465:. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the 454: 450: 260: 182: 2069: 862:

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

2743: 2540: 2536: 2442: 1966: 1505: 897: 831: 662: 639: 370: 213: 25: 2999: 2911: 2836: 2763: 2647: 2470: 562: 2489: 2450: 2434: 916: 449:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

341: 103: 84: 2352:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

607:, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see 438: 2506: 1821: 1311: 1138: 712: 544: 337: 31:

Thank you for experimenting with Knowledge. Your test worked, and it has been

18: 1655: 588:

to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only

140:

I've posted at the talk page about the article. You've done some great work.

3112: 3070: 2981: 2895: 2822: 2751: 2727: 2706: 2632: 2577: 2548: 2495: 2387: 2365: 2270: 2243: 2225: 2194: 2174: 2157: 2133: 2115: 2090: 2059: 1872: 1850: 1833: 1815: 1798: 1776: 1758: 1743: 1727: 1712: 1669: 1645: 1613: 1586: 1571: 1553: 1530: 1491: 1473: 1426: 1405: 1329: 1302: 1284: 1239: 1217: 1194: 1166: 1146: 1086: 1067: 1036: 1016: 976: 953: 928: 905: 802: 776: 752: 706: 647: 627: 552: 527: 394: 378: 349: 319: 287: 244: 221: 190: 149: 92: 63: 915:

Hi, Bash. Just letting you know I'm also keeping an idea on the vandal at

2446: 720: 693:

Actually I didn't add any original research. Caffeine is classified as a

264: 3039:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2951:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2873:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2800:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2684:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2096:

Edited Consciousness - Consciousness Types by Hiiqit made 2013, March 25

2076:

This is a friendly reminder to involved parties that there is a current

1521:

Don't waste time and computer space with this crap. Stick to the blogs.

1444:

Personal editor's opinion's do not decide what is included in Knowledge.

43:

if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

3017:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2929:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2438: 2234:

This is drivel. You will be blocked if you post racist comments again.

1972:

It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been

1658: 1372:

to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Knowledge. The page on

732: 716: 1882: 2737:

I noticed that, way back in 2011, you rightly objected to an edit to

2425:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was 2274: 1562:

sources, it may be used, otherwise it's personal opinion and cannot.

728: 2599:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

599:

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious

3052:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2964:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2510: 763: 740: 667:

enter the term you are interested in the search box (try "Arya")

21: 3042:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

2954:

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

2876:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

2803:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

2687:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

1392:

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the

869:

the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click

3011:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

2396: 2012:

Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{

736: 1177: 883:

If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off

653:

Looking up Sanskrit words in Monier-Williams' 1899 dictionary

2068: 1881: 1338: 1004:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

986: 813: 561: 497:

explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for

459:

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

437: 423:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

405: 178:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

160: 1461: 611:). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found 1976:(not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN. 1482:

Knowledge ain't got none rules abut grammer on talk pages.

1335:

File copyright problem with File:Hal Block WhatsMyLine.png

1152:

re thanks for advice re documentary film For Love or Money

859:, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. 231:

Hey, Just to let you know, I agree with your position at

121:

How funny that you dropped that note when you did. I was

2923:

is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All

940:

Hi - I've just added a belated reply to your comment on

233:

User_talk:GoodDay#Who_was_the_Leaf_captain_for_2008-2009

102:

Nice work improving this article. It needed it. Thanks!

3023: