User talk:Bduke/archive2 - Knowledge (XXG)

272:

psychologist but have long enjoyed epistemology. Unlike your field of expertise, both philosopy and psychology have yet to find a common ground and remain divided into different schools of thought. Most of the time its not a problem. But sometimes people get irrational in their passions for or against a point of view. There are proponents of Objectivism that behave in a cult-like fashion and there are individuals who feel compelled to attack anything associated with Ayn Rand. All that I did was include her work on epistemology in the epistemology category. After a few 'reverts' I might have given up, but I kept thinking that it is so wrong for people to do that. Honest disagreements are different. They are healthy for the culture and for Knowledge (XXG) because each side makes their points, everyone can read both sides and be that much more informed. The alternative is to let those whose edits are born of a dislike for an idea or a person carry out what is really a kind of censorship. Sorry about this lengthy diatribe. But there ought to be a way to stop that kind of thing. Otherwise all of the areas susceptible to any controversy will be vulnerable and Knowledge (XXG) will fall short of what it could have been. You obviously care about Knowledge (XXG), I'd love to hear your thoughts on this.

282:

or I delete it, depending on the debate. All recent ones have been kept, although when we started the process back in January we did debate most of the then present entries and deleted some. The problem is that it is very easy for these articles to just become a selection of different people's POV views on what books are important. Philosophy is sort of a hobby with me, but really only philosophy of science, although my wife has a MA in philosophy and a BA in Philosophy/English. We discuss philosophy quite a bit, although her interests have moved elsewhere. On Rand I have no real opinion. I tend to think she is not mainstream enough, but I could be wrong. I'm not going to get into your debate. I think you should allow it to be deleted, argue your case carefully on the talk page, go to the

297:

actions. The problem is that some people believe a degree of deception is acceptable if it is in pursuit of their values. I predict that under current policies and practices a vocal and slightly deceptive minority will effectively censor views in all areas of controvery. Those people who attempted to represent opposing views, honestly, will lose and leave the community. Over time Knowledge (XXG) will become know as a valuable resource, but only in non-controversial areas - in those areas it will be seen as biased and less than honest.

1965:", and I somewhat accept this as being true. The Scouts aren't just what they used to be and the number of kids particpating these days is a lot lower than was the norm during the first half of the century. Why? Does anybody apart from the Scouting organisations themselves care, and has anybody bothered to write about it that we can use as another source? We may need to do our searching offline for some external sources on this topic to bring the article to a fine balance representing all views. -- 2248:, Tuesday, 30 January 1996: front page stories in both national newspapers. The Somares at no time disputed the reports, nor did they threaten libel. The stories were not followed up and no editorial commentary or letters to the editor were published; however, this was due to private threats made against the owners and management of the papers by members of the Somare family rather than any threat of legal action to vindicate the integrity of Sir Michael. 31: 1386:

qualitative judgements you don't like and think are unjustified. Don't delete unless it's just plain WRONG, as we need the material and can't get people to write it (yeah that includes you). Replace POV opinions you don't like with you consider a more balanced set of view. It's impossible of course to avoid some POV in any article, as we all know. See other comments I left on the TALK page there, before I came here.

2187:

be so many articles written and not maintaind these days - they just drop and run it seems. BUT I would be concerned that such a merge happens if the parent article remains as poorly. For the main scouting article here in wa - it reflects what I pickup about the organisation in general - however I keep my counsel here on wikipedia- anyway have a good christmas - please dont reply on my talk

791: 487: 1497:) and each time I've been unhappy with the result. However this is the first time when I have felt that the person really doesnt warrant a mention, but its hard to swallow that a scholar who isnt notable would sink so low as to re-create a deleted biographical entry ~ "only in america" ? Probably not. Anyway, much appreciated. p.s. is there a melb meet on the horizon? 1443:, I will try to fix this tomorrow. I happen to one of those who think that the way people think about MO and VB theory to make compounds, i.e. qualitative theory, should be by using theories, however simple, that are in accordance with conclusions from calculations. Feel free to improve my grammer etc., when I do enter the fray here. -- 344:

Philosophy discussion page to start a dialog on better methods for handling controversy (I have some ideas). But no response. My choices and everyone elses that experiences something like this: play that stupid edit-war or withdraw and leave the articles to those who are happy to use edit-wars to support their POV.

1981:

Scout Heritage centres are being moved to be all together at the Jamboree and these are a good source of information. Back to the article, there are now some non-Scout links and the collaborative international projects are supported by links to Scout links in the other countries involved. The Jamboree BTW is at

2211:

Having been involved in the time my children were either in cubs or scouts I find it hard to see where the centre holds - things seem so transient in parts of the organisation - I suppose bit like an unstable compound (have no fear I failed high school chemistry) - but somehow things keep going. The

2186:

Hi, long time no speak (aka vcxlor) just snooping and saw this - does this proposal mean you disencourage individual troop articles? The parent article looks like all current wa articles minimalist and poorly done. I would think that if youre going to merge that nonone wil even know - there seem to

1707:

I've looked at this to see what your guys are talking about. What's odd is that WAGGGS is both on the same level as Guiding (both as a sub of Scouting, as is WOSM) and also a sub of Guiding. If we make WAGGGS only a sub of Guiding, some GG/GS may say why isn't WAGGGS at the same level as WOSM? I have

1692:

without realising that it was parent to the WAGGGS category, and really to encourage the Guiding folk that we are taking them seriously. In fact I think I saw one article with both categories listed and just followed but I can not recollect which one. I'm happy to discuss it on the Project talk page,

1578:

Dear Bduke, I just accepted your offer to mediate in our dispute. Since I do not know how you will proceed, I would like to ask the opportunity to present my view on this matter in a small statement (rather than you having to extract my view from the cluttered talk page). Naturally, I welcome similar

1479:

What an odd case. It does seem that Cooper is the mathematician amd probably the leader of the project. As such Boone seems not notable. The Google Scholar publications have massive gaps. If he deserves an article then I do!! (not really). It does not seem that he meets the criteria for notability of

1271:

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work.

514:

I started this project quite possibly too hastly. However, I also feel that I will continue to be involved in many levels with this technology for many years. On a different note, I am interested in educating myself more in computational chemistry. So if you would like to talk off wiki, my email is

194:

I thought you might be interested to know that, historically, the British spelling is actually 'organization' (and is preferred by the OED, if I remember correctly). In any case, both are acceptable in the UK. I won't change it back on the Oxford article, as it's really not worth getting into an edit

2050:

Hi HC, if you mean go and put something on various pages that we have voted overwhelmingly for the new regime (guidelines), I was going to do that, but I thought I would wait to see if anyone else voted. We would then have had a larger vote that the Maths and Physics projects, which says something -

1813:

Ok, I'll unblock that account. I have no issue with you editing the article- you seem to be a responsible editor who I am sure will be able to judge when you have a COI. I think it may be good however to point them to a few other biographies to explain what exactly is the normal level of detail that

1567:

talk page will be taken as an 'accept'. This offer will last until 2400 UTC Dec 2, 2006. Keep in mind that we live all over the world and users need time to respond---specifically, Bduke lives in Australia. DO NOT make any moves until at least 24 hours have passed since his last posting on an issue.

448:

Sir Alan - provost of my old college, Queen's, Oxford - is a Knight Bachelor, not a Knight Commander of the Order of the Bath. As such, he is correctly styled simply "Sir Alan (Peter) Budd" with no post-nominal letters. Although senior civil servants are commonly given KCBs, Sir Alan's position as

426:

Hope that they will bestir themselves just a bit -- at least to express their discontent, unhappiness about their youthful introduction to entroy via such an unscientific term as 'disorder'. This strangely simple request (that a number of chemists, and not just I, SAY 'disorder' did not help them --

337:

All that I was trying to do was have a link from the epistemology section to her book on epistemology. Her book is not controversial (apart from her name on it) - you'll find some language and some approaches to Universals almost identical to Bertrand Russell's. She has contributed refinements and

314:

If Rand is not main stream then I do not think her book should be listed in the list of publications in philosophy. These articles in the Science pearls project are intended for books that are really non-controversal and have an importance throughout the field. However, there should be NPOV articles

281:

Steve, thank you for your considered views. I watch the lists of publications in X because I appear to have become the organiser of the chemistry one. There we subject each new entry such as yours to a 10 day debate on the talk page. I organise that at the moment. After 10 days I leave the new entry

1980:

with Scout articles on UK, PNG and many other places, as well as Australia. Second, I doubt that the Australian Scout editors will be active for now as I'm sure that they are all going to the Jamboree in January - the first in the world to celebrate 100 years of Scouting. Also all the various State

591:

I understand your concerns but think they can be addressed in the way the introduction is written and then perhaps by a paragraph about the RAOU days. Are there any Australians birders who might have an opinion? Would it help if we copy this to the talk page the merge tags point ot and continue the

460:

My old College also (57 - 63). It seems you are correct. I did find a non-WP reference that called him KCB but a reference to the Oxford Gazzette does not, so I am convinced. If you had explained this in an edit summary, all would have been well. Also I noticed that you had not taken him out of the

310:

I know there are difficulties but I not accept that the mainstream of wikipedia is suppressing the "truth". The reality is that there are a lot of single issue POV pushers with an agenda to include complete nonsense into Knowledge (XXG). I am not including you in their number. Where people disagree

2300:

The majority of the books i have featuring physical chemistry tell me also that chemical physics seem to be some forms of misprints, or so -- there was a story on how someone published the name incorrectly due to the fact they thought it was mostly based in chemistry, so therefore it was chemistry

1976:

Troops. I lot of other organisations, including political parties, have the same problem. Just a couple of points further at this stage. First, I have no connection with Scouts Australia. I have not been a Scout Leader since 1970 and that was in UK. I have a soft spot for them however, and work on

393:

I desperately wish that you, with your skill, experience and background, plus 5 or 6 from the Chemistry ?Group? or some interested chemists would curb the control of these 2 or 3 information 'entropy' guys! Is there no editorial supervision? (Guess that's a dumb question...!) No authority who can

286:

talk page and argue your case there, asking for people to go and comment on the debate on the list of pubs talk page. Then you may have to accept that there is no consensus to include it or you may be successfull. But you will have followed the Knowledge (XXG) way. You win some and you lose some.

271:

Your point about our behavior being out of line was well taken (the edit war). I take no joy in conflict of that sort. I'm very new to Knowledge (XXG) and one of the things that does give me joy is see what an extraordinary structure is emerging from the cooperation of complete strangers. I'm a

1975:

I do not disagree. I added something today about the decline in numbers from the Scouts Australia's own annual reports. Note the number of Groups has declined as well as number of members. This goes along with a view that people no longer have the time to volunteer for such tasks as running Scout

331:

But there is no mainstream for philosophy in the same sense as Chemistry or math where being outside of the mainstream would have serious impact. There are too many issues in philosophy that are still in contention - including the most basic of principles. For example, "Is there a reality apart

1872:

Oh, and also when you have a minute if you could talk to user mathchem. He seems to be rather put out that the article discusses Schaefer's religious position much more than his chemical research. I've asked the user to help out improving the chemical matter but other than his earlier attempt to

1854:

Three things- first I've sent you an email- feel free to respond or not. Second, I would point out that even a not very active user who is well trusted can benefit from the admin tools. The rollback tool especially is useful for dealing with the occasional vandalism edit. Third, I agree that the

325:

The mainstream of Knowledge (XXG) isn't suppressing the truth. A small number of editors are stating that Rand isn't mainstream and therfore shouldn't be included. Rand is mainstream in the sense that she is philosopher whose views are in contention in many different areas of philosophy and is

300:

Ayn Rand is not main stream in the sense of being accepted by most of philosophy's academic crowd. She had a very sharp tongue, disagreed with main stream academics' approach and was very vocal in her disagreements. If academic philosophy sets the standards for inclusion, then her work will be

296:

Brian, I will follow your advice. But, sadly, I predict that remedy will be inadequate for the underlying problem. Some people place their personal likes and dislikes above the guiding purpose of Knowledge (XXG). By itself that's not a problem if they are open, honest and transparent in their

1840:

I am trying to get her to put their concerns on the talk page or at least tell me and I'll do it, but they appear now to have decided to let it go. I may get more from them in the morning here. As for Admin, I am really not impressed by the RfA process and appear to have very little need of it.

1385:

Here I'm lecturing you on how wikipedia works, and looking at your user page, you're fully aware of how the place works. SOFIXIT on the main chem bond page. Just leave out the math for this general article, is all I personally ask as a fellow editor for this page. Ruthlessly fix and replace any

684:

You have done a good job, but I have doubts that all are viable. The 13th has a good history and may be viable. The 14th is no different from 100s of Troops and I doubt it is viable. There are very few individual Troop/Group articles from the whole world. Rathfarnham has, as far as I can see, a

343:

I followed your advise but there is no consensus forming or even comments (apart from yours). I provided the fellow who kept deleting the link with a lengthy set of cites but he just blew them off. I've put out appeals on the List of Publications discussion page and in the Knowledge (XXG)

205:

You could be right. I only have access right now to two Australian dictionaries. One has 'organisation' and one has 'organization'. However, as an Oxford man, I think the consensus there is to use 'organisation' and that was in the article. I thought it should not be chnaged without debate.

753:

Hi, Charles. I have not actually gone yet, but the planning is largely keeping me off WP so I thought I would put the wikibreak tags up. I have cleaned up you comments. Please add ~~~~ at the end to sign your comments. I never did get around to doing anything about your additions to

1752: 1792:

Can you determine which part is copyvio and remove it? (I doubt that was the concern given the edit summaries and other issues). Incidentally, the new account was a sockpuppet as confirmed by checkuser. I'm therefore blocking it and asking him to return to the main account.

548:

There was a merge tag on this and the vote was 2:1, to do the merge. Ardenn closed it and removed the merge tag claiming "no consensus" and Chris wants to still merge it. That's what the debate is about. My guess is Ardenn was in this group or at least supports their cause.

394:

evaluate...? Thermodynamic entropy is FAR more a topic of intense concern to beginning chemistry students -- whether or not they go on in chem -- than it is to physics majors. Why aren't chemists participating in restraining those who so insistently focus on 'disorder'.?!!

1532:

has offered to be the Scouting WikiProject mediator and accept this as his first case on these conditions: 1. All parties must agree to his mediating. 2. All parties must not move any articles until the mediation is completed. 3. If consensus is not reached they must let

1952:

article would benefit from external sources to bring the article from a showpiece for the Scouts, to a well balanced article presenting all views. Articles on the various Scouting organisations in Australia are likely to have made local newspapers in times gone by.

1708:

a suggestion that I think will meet both your concerns and also follow wiki policy on categories: Put WAGGGS, WOSM, and the non-aligned cat all under "Scouting related associations" and put WAGGGS under Guiding also. Thoughts? I've put this on both your talk pages.

685:

rather odd scope. It is between a Group and a County, but I do understand that parts of it are in different counties. I'd prefer to see this deleted and articles for the whole of the two Counties written, but I'm happy to be guided by Irish Scouting Wikipedians. --

109:

Yes I agree with you although I do not intend to write detailed articles for every county/area. However I feel if a basic page with the structure of the areas is there then local people involved can edit it themselves. Lists are better than nothing. (Added by

2257:

I'm afraid that your disquiet is somewhat nervous-nelly-ish. Truth is always an absolute defence in a libel suit, and in any event the bar is considerably higher in the USA than in English common law jurisdictions: in US law one must prove actual malice.

1814:

a biography should have as well as point out the general unacceptability of whitewashing. (Also, if you can get either Schaeffer and or this assistant of his to understand the importance of discussing things on the talk pages that would be very good).

2221:

Yes, the ACT one is pretty good. I have no connection with Scouts Australia by the way, so I'm not sure where it is all going. I was on a Group committee when my kids were in a Group in the NT and my daughter is now a leader in cubs herein Melbourne.

1418:

Part of the issue may lie in the distinction between describing bonding for those that make compounds and use them vs. describing bonding from the perspective of computational methods that rely on a VB or MO approach, where I am completely out of my

1028:

Thanks for the comments about the article - yeah, we camp near Hathersage every May to climb Stanage Edge and some of the local millstone quarries. About the peer review - I have already run the review script and posted the results on the article's

476:

I see you have/someone has found the year of his knighthood. I had asked my friend who is still at Queen's to find out - he pointed out that he has in fact met you. His name is Chris Ballinger. Just thought I'd mention it - hope you don't mind.

366:(2) that 'disorder' is indeed dead in modern US general chemistry texts (and in most physical chemistry texts back to at least 2002, now that Oxonian Atkins has come over to my side) PLEASE just glance at the December 2005 list of changed texts in 1635:. The latter groups together just the articles on WAGGGS member organisations and the former covers everything. I think it is good for now at least for the Guides to find everything Guiding in one place. Should I remove the parent relationship? -- 2201:

Have a good Christmas. I did not add the merge tags. I just started the discussion. It is indeed widely established that individual troops, groups etc are not notable. The Scouting Project accepts this and AfD over many months have supported it.

461:

KCB category so I was suspicious of the removal. I have removed the cat and the reference. Sorry, I made a mistake and mentioned Baronet in my edit summary. Do you know when he was made a Knight Bachelor? Could you add that to the article? --

1413:

I am - or was - the one pushing the MO thing, but you seem to know more, so indeed please make the required corrections to get the dispute tag off. Readers need to find an undisputed article on bonding! Or a relatively undisputed one.

1962:

absolutely no one writes about scouts outside of the organisation these days - between the 1930's and 1950's there were always plenty of stories in the australian media - anybody would be really struggling to find anything for current

2296:

article is; an overview of the key principles included in the actual thing itself as well as the foundation of it. I've not got too many books on physical chemistry -- on the article itself, i've only got about 4 of those mentioned.

1494: 2118:. The latter listed three uses, while the former listed many more but including those three, so I made the former a redirect to the latter. My point is that valence bond theory is not the same as valence (chemistry). -- 581:

One problems seems to be a lack of historical importance of the RAOU in its day if it gets absorbed, headings and other things should not let the current identity swamp the earlier stages of the organisation IMHO :)

301:

marginalized. And that would be a shame because all serious thoughts and serious thinkers need to be represented inorder to build a stronger knowledge base in the future. Thank you for time and the suggestions.

1802:

It is not there right now. It was the mass of career stuff, awards etc that was reverted. I have just heard from him by e-mail and was replying when I noticed this. I hope my advice to him will sort it all out.

1334:

Do you have ideas for next month's portal features? I'm having trouble coming up with good articles, etc to feature. Happy Thanksgiving! Do you do that in Oz? I know they have it in Canada, but in Oct not Nov.

1911:

to Knowledge (XXG) articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior.

2301:

with physics in it; chemical physics. Not too sure about it though.. chemical physics could be a pseudonym for thermodynamics of activation or something similar; who knows? The books, i guess! :-)

423:

I left a long message there for chemists about the sad state of affairs on Entropy -- no word of chemistry at the outset and little thereafter, but plenty of 'disorder' and information "entropy"!

1841:

Unbanning Fritz's admin was one of very few and because I worked with him, I should at least consult another admin. I'll think about it over Christmas and let you know. Thanks for offering. --

531:

I would welcome any input/comments/criticisms you could make on this article, especially as it was mostly writeen from memory without being checked against secondary sources! Best wishes,

2276:

It might originate in Fiji (I do not know), but it is still called a laplap in PNG. Perhaps you would care to source your edits on this topic also. Is it notable that Somare wears one? --

986:, trying to clear the points on a peer review I made last week and get the article past its "start" status. I was just wondering if you could pass over and see what you think, cheers, 843: 254: 721: 695: 1489:

Thanks for confirming that. I have seen a few cases of AfD's for academics result in the biography being deleted, or the person requesting their WP account being deleted (such as

380:(4) to write the first page(s) of Entropy in a beginner or layperson accessible language rather than tossing elegantly concise thermo summaries at the innocent reader immediately. 869:. It passed with an amazing final tally of 160/4/1. It was fantastic having the support of so many awesome Aussie editors. I hope you have a safe and enjoyable holiday. Cheers, 2335:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "

427:

or maybe confused them) may well be news to the info guys running the Entropy article. They are absolutely fixed and adamant about saying how essential it is not to discredit '

838: 332:

from consciousness or not?" Some of the philosophy academics have emotional reactions to her, others see her as another major philosopher even if they don't agree with her.

758:. They are valuable additions. My concern was that this article is fairly general and your comments are rather specific. I would prefer your discussion on PPP to be in the 1102: 449:

one of the "seven wise men" was semi-official and for this reason he got an ordinary knighthood (also, the number of KCBs are limited, so they restrict recipients).

1345:

Portal. I'm trying to think. Thanksgiving. No, its a North American thing. I'm working on our Victoria State election tomorrow so that is the big deal right now. --

866: 133:

Hi Bduke. Type in BPSA in the search box and see what happens. :) (Although I should have been more clear in the edit summary. Sorry for the confusion.) Cheers.--

2343:). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge (XXG), or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at 1422:

Another part of the issue that divides some of us may lie in the distinction between VB and hybridization, which the current article implies are the same thing.

1033:

page. I've checked off most of it - just need someone else to check if the last three comments are satisfied and help upgrade the class of the article. Cheers,

315:

on Rand and there should be proper NPOV references to her work in many articles on philosophy. I have no idea whether there are. As I said it is not my area. --

941: 2267:"...a Fijian skirt, known in Papua New Guinea as a laplap." Nogat tru ia. Turangu, dispela kainkain samting i no laplap; em i sulu bilong ol man bilong Fiji. 2344: 1656:

since these associations are clearly a part of the Guide movement (if we consent there is something like this...). Concerning "parental categories" pls see

221:

Hello Brian. I think you are definitely capable and ready to become an admin. I would be happy to write a nomination for you. Are you interested? Regards,

2037: 797: 780: 2017:), starting from 7pm. We don't currently have a separate location for discussion beforehand, but there'll be plenty of time to talk wiki over dinner. -- 1014:

Hello again - are you less busy now? I've seen the mediator thing you're undertaking, so if you're not I can always ask someone else to give me a hand.

1758:

Just thought I'd drop you a note to tell you you've both supported and opposed this user for the arbcom on the same page (probably) by mistake. Cheers

1688:

On reflection I think you were right. WAGGGS should be under Guiding category, as it indeed is and has been for some time. I put several articles into

572:

The latter as is suggested with the merge tags. RAOU should be a redirect, in part because it is linked from German and Spanish WP articles on RAOU. --

238:

I am going to be travelling overseas for the second half of the next 3 months, so I going to postpone thinking about this until I return in October. --

1462: 1233: 2352: 1948:

Hi Bduke. A lot of articles (and not just Australian content) exists at Knowledge (XXG) containing only a primary source, or no sources at all. The

1082: 755: 2328: 2311: 1767: 1742: 1189: 373:(3) that information 'entropy' is clearly distinguished from thermodynamic entropy (I think I have almost won that old old argument. (My essence: 2292:

Yeah, i was reading around it and it's pretty bad as is.. as i see it, the Physical Chemistry article should be a similar kind of article as the

1729:, so I'm giving you this message to remind you that Melbounre meetup number four is currently in planning. If you haven't already, please go to 1668: 2336: 621:

Glad to see all that work has been done on the Australia articles, that you're keeping an eye on it, and updated the Todo page. YIS, Randy

713:. The design is not well supported, and right before I was going to archive the debate for lack of support, someone else moved it to the 283: 92: 2348: 1162: 701:

Would you be so kind as to go to the discussion about the Islamic Wikiproject Award? This has been a proposal that has lingered for

431:, (After all the confusion it has caused in the past 100 years among hundreds of thousands of chemists and millions of students!!) 1977: 2347:. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to 1985:

from 2 - 13 Jan. If you see any press reports please let me know. It might encourage the press to ask the questions you raise. --

1097: 645:

where I also raised a more general question which I would be pleased to have a discussion on. Is the book good? I have only read

738:

Hi. Thanks for the note. I am the guy who wrote the article on pi-electron theory, When you get back you can drop me a line at

1137: 1122: 420:

I discovered the Chemistry group and also saw your 9 July message re phys chem and the entropy article. You're ahead of me :-)

1466: 714: 710: 1312:

discussions. I too have been trying to think of improvements to the article, and have added my ideas for the introduction to

1142: 2332: 2212:

thing is that the wa entry looks poor - is there an exemplary state article worth holding up as an example to improve to?

1371:

Many thanks for the welcome! I see you have put a lot of time into Chemistry on wikipedia - thank you very much for that!

902: 1649: 1632: 1614: 962: 500: 2000: 1873:

revert to the copyvio version he seems to be unwilling. Maybe since your in the same field you can talk to him? I dunno.

1730: 1726: 1718: 1507: 1167: 2340: 1548:

can accept it or reject it. Either way, the decision is final and all parties are bound by Scout's honor to follow it.

1763: 1738: 805: 2158: 1207: 1127: 638: 38: 759: 642: 2154: 2136: 2107: 1291: 1251: 1197: 1132: 410: 2157:, but in case you didn't get that here's my crude table thus far (I'm only up to about the 1920s presently): 88: 1935: 1313: 1087: 672: 1914: 1759: 1734: 1238: 115: 1908: 389:

of course. Some 25 pages of earlier back and forth are at the end of Archive 2 of that Talk/Entropy site.

326:

recognized as such (take a look at my addition to the discussion page - List of Philosophy Publications).

1563:) talk page so they will not miss the offer. Failure to respond with a 'accept' or 'not accept' on the 874: 650: 525: 228: 746: 111: 1689: 1664: 1653: 1628: 1610: 69:

thanks for the heads up, I didn't realise that. Sorry for any inconvenience if I caused it. (Added by

1490: 1321: 1280: 1261: 1157: 1030: 966: 909: 889: 676: 535: 2094: 2073: 2022: 1896: 1889: 1593: 1580: 1560: 1372: 923: 453: 360:

For two weeks now, I have arduously worked to make the introduction (at least) of the WK 'Entropy'

223: 397:

I know that you are terribly busy, but is there any more central concept to chem than entropy??!!

2286: 2213: 2192: 1923: 1753:

Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/Vote/Can't sleep, clown will eat me

1243: 664: 605: 583: 564: 134: 70: 1999:

Greetings, person who is listed as being interested in future meetups in Melbourne. The fourth

892:

page that you previously showed interest in now that Kehrli has been banned from the article.--

817: 809: 646: 496: 435: 407: 1771: 2162: 2140: 2098: 2090: 2061: 2041: 1982: 1949: 1942: 1480:

academics. I think a merge seems the best solution. You get into interesting areas of WP. --

1112: 1048: 870: 702: 345: 302: 273: 1657: 812:

on how I might be able to use them to help the project. All the best, and thanks again! —

706: 2014: 1317: 1295: 1147: 1061: 996:

I'll look at it next week. I'm running a conference this weekend! Not much time for WP. --

983: 976: 532: 47: 17: 2351:, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the 400:

THANKS for any aid!! I'm exhausted after 60 or more hours just on this...:-) My email is

1631:

should exist to collect together all guiding articles, but it should not be a parent to

808:. I'll be tentative with the new buttons for a while, and certainly welcome any and all 2302: 2293: 2040:? Not sure what the other WikiChemists think, but I'm sure they won't mind at all... -- 2018: 1440: 1427: 1284: 1215: 1179: 1077: 1034: 1015: 1006: 987: 927: 96: 1855:

current RfA process is not in good shape but I'm confident you would pass if you ran.

1669:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Scouting#Scout/Guide or Boy Scout/Girl Scout equality

1617:. Do we really need this double categorization? To me this seems quite unnecessary. -- 2321: 1966: 1957: 1436: 1400: 1397: 1392: 1387: 1256: 1107: 2013:

in Fed Square (in the Alfred Deaking building, Flinders Street end near the Atrium:

821: 2268: 2259: 2249: 1874: 1856: 1828: 1815: 1794: 1465:

regarding an old AfD, and cast your eye over the Google Scholar search results for

1458: 1309: 1220: 1184: 893: 813: 776: 516: 492: 176: 158: 148: 486: 311:

we have difficulty reaching the correct consensus or indeed know what is correct.

1725:

Hello, you've indicated that you're interested in future Meetups in Melbourne on

91:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

2356: 2079:

Hi Sadi, please see what I am about to put on the talk page for this article. --

2005: 1709: 1672: 1618: 1569: 1556: 1545: 1534: 1498: 1470: 1355: 1336: 1225: 1117: 1092: 945: 790: 739: 668: 631: 622: 550: 401: 196: 157:

Stole your House Rules message box - thanks - didnt know how to do that myself.

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1827:

Also, you should consider running for adminship. I'd be happy to nominate you.

374: 2359: 2305: 2280: 2277: 2271: 2262: 2252: 2226: 2223: 2216: 2206: 2203: 2195: 2175: 2172: 2165: 2143: 2122: 2119: 2101: 2083: 2080: 2064: 2055: 2052: 2044: 2026: 1989: 1986: 1970: 1926: 1877: 1859: 1845: 1842: 1831: 1818: 1807: 1804: 1797: 1781: 1778: 1746: 1712: 1697: 1694: 1675: 1639: 1636: 1621: 1596: 1583: 1572: 1552: 1541: 1537:

as the project coordinator decide whether to implement my final conclusions.

1529: 1514: 1511: 1501: 1484: 1481: 1473: 1447: 1444: 1430: 1403: 1375: 1358: 1349: 1346: 1339: 1324: 1298: 1051: 1037: 1018: 1009: 1000: 997: 990: 969: 948: 930: 912: 896: 878: 854: 851: 770: 767: 728: 725: 689: 686: 679: 653: 625: 608: 596: 593: 586: 576: 573: 567: 553: 538: 519: 504: 465: 462: 438: 348: 319: 316: 305: 291: 288: 276: 261: 258: 242: 239: 231: 210: 207: 199: 179: 170: 167: 161: 151: 137: 122: 119: 99: 77: 74: 1663:

I think we should discuss the existence of Guiding (and related matters like

1354:

OK, if you come up with something, just drop it in the "Candidates" fields.

1152: 1064:

predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

722:

Knowledge (XXG):Barnstar_and_award_proposals/New_Proposals#Another_image

267:

regarding your comments on the Philosopy Publications Discussion page...

2115: 2111: 2097:

article, as he was the one that introduced the concept of "valence". --

1272:

Your contributions make Knowledge (XXG) better -- thanks for helping.

1202: 940:

Since you commented freely before, I thought you may want to check out

367: 363:(1) reflect that thermo entropy has something to do with chemistry (!), 2110:

for you. I was delayed by sorting out a confusion of the disamb pages

2010: 1671:. The category and its use is surely part of this larger problem. -- 1290:

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on

1592:

Thanks, and have a good night! (Its morning here in Europe :) ). --

1469:

to double check that this biography article isnt notable. Cheers,

926:

my talk page, as per your request at the top of this page. Thanks.

922:

Hello. Just letting you know that I've replied to your question on

763: 709:, but don't think the image is in line with most of the images at 766:

article. I think that is where they belong. What do you think? --

1047:

Hi Brian - there's a message for you on Wikiversity. Cheers, --

888:

Hi, just wanted to stop by and invite you to contribute to the

1544:

will make a final recommendation if there is no consensus and

1463:

Talk:Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search#Boone and Cooper AfD

643:

Talk:University of Oxford#Oxford in literature and other media

386: 25: 147:

That is a fantastic idea, replacing the symbols with images.

1733:

to suggest possible dates, times and locations. Thanks --

796:

Hello, Bduke, and thank you for the support on my recent

2089:

Yes, just give me a minute or two, I am about to put in

2036:

So...Bduke, can we nominate you to be our ambassador to

961:

Just letting you know that I replied to your comment on

1900: 1294:. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- 434:

Hope I am not diverting people from your goals! Frank

93:

the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page

762:(PPP) article and your comments on ZINDO to be in the 452:

With your agreement, can we delete the KCB ? Added by

2171:

Yep, I saw it, but have been busy. I'll add to it. --

1457:

Hi Brian, could you take a look at (living chemist)

1279:

on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on

963:

Template talk:Infobox Journal#Problem with ISSN part

1381:

Thanks for the comments on chem bonding. Go for it.

1627:I have had nothing to do with these. I think that 1506:I'll give you a "definite maybe" on that one. See 592:discussion there? It might draw more people in. -- 2331:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the 908:Hi Brian, would you weigh in on this discussion? 338:advances within a framework started by Aristotle. 1057:Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot 942:Knowledge (XXG):Requests_for_mediation/Boy_Scout 675:in a way that (I hope) all of us can live with. 166:No worries. I see you are also in Melbourne. -- 2038:Knowledge (XXG):Scientific citation guidelines 1693:but I am not sure what we have to discuss. -- 865:Hey Brian, thank you for supporting my recent 741:or here. I am kind-of new to this... Charles. 404: 354: 8: 2345:Talk:Vanuatu branch of The Scout Association 1579:statements by the other parties. Regards, -- 649:in the series and that was a long time ago. 375:http://www.entropysite.com/calpoly_talk.html 355:HELP! The 'Entropy' article and I need you! 1031:Talk:Explorer_Scouts#Peer_Review discussion 60:Archive from June 1st - December 31st, 2006 2060:Ah - let's wait for the something then. -- 1103:Associação dos Escuteiros de Timor Lorosae 1234:List of open problems in computer science 804:, and I have now been entrusted with the 720:The current discussion is going on here: 84:TfD nomination of Template:Physics Series 1751: 1083:Journal of the American Chemical Society 954:comment on Template talk:Infobox Journal 756:Semi-empirical quantum chemistry methods 2329:Vanuatu branch of The Scout Association 2312:Vanuatu branch of The Scout Association 1190:The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 705:. I think the image is acceptable as a 1907:that attempts to recognize and repair 903:Image talk:--MongoliaScoutsuniform.jpg 284:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Philosophy 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1316:– hope that's of some assistance! .. 7: 2153:I left a message about the email on 1978:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Scouting 1650:Category:WAGGGS member organizations 1633:Category:WAGGGS member organizations 1615:Category:WAGGGS member organizations 1308:Thanks for coming in on the current 387:http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Entropy 368:http://www.entropysite.com/#whatsnew 1922:about the bot and this warning. // 1777:Thanks. It was indeed an error. -- 711:Knowledge (XXG):Wikiproject awards 24: 2341:Knowledge (XXG)'s deletion policy 1551:I am posting this on everyone's ( 1163:Luxembourg Boy Scouts Association 1066: 839:Islamic Wikiproject Award Archive 2106:I have written somethign on the 2051:not sure what, but something. -- 1731:Knowledge (XXG):Meetup/Melbourne 1508:Knowledge (XXG):Meetup/Melbourne 1098:The Chemical History of a Candle 789: 563:Birds to RAOU or RAOU to Birds? 485: 255:Knowledge (XXG) awards committee 249:Knowledge (XXG) awards committee 29: 1138:Journal of Physical Chemistry B 1123:Journal of Physical Chemistry A 724:. Your input is appreciated. -- 2135:Let's move this discussion to 1658:WP:CAT#Some general guidelines 1143:Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 897:00:04, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 879:04:56, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 855:15:16, 18 September 2006 (UTC) 510:WikiProject Spectroscopy, etc. 1: 2360:19:50, 31 December 2006 (UTC) 2306:22:05, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 2281:01:42, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 2272:01:36, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 2263:19:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC) 2253:05:13, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 2246:Papua New Guinea Post-Courier 2227:02:14, 25 December 2006 (UTC) 2217:02:01, 25 December 2006 (UTC) 2207:01:34, 25 December 2006 (UTC) 2196:00:03, 25 December 2006 (UTC) 2176:21:05, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2166:19:17, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 2144:00:49, 21 December 2006 (UTC) 2123:00:25, 21 December 2006 (UTC) 2102:00:15, 21 December 2006 (UTC) 2084:00:02, 21 December 2006 (UTC) 2065:00:10, 20 December 2006 (UTC) 2056:21:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC) 2045:18:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC) 2027:14:58, 16 December 2006 (UTC) 1990:08:42, 15 December 2006 (UTC) 1971:08:05, 15 December 2006 (UTC) 1927:19:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC) 1515:21:47, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 1502:12:33, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 1485:10:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 1474:09:38, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 1461:and the recent discussion on 1448:07:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC) 1431:06:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC) 1404:05:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC) 1376:20:05, 23 November 2006 (UTC) 1359:12:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC) 1350:09:03, 24 November 2006 (UTC) 1340:12:09, 23 November 2006 (UTC) 1325:12:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC) 1299:21:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1128:Friends Committee on Scouting 1052:20:43, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1010:08:45, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 1005:That's fine - no real hurry. 1001:22:53, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 991:11:39, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 844:Renewed call for a Braintrust 641:and posted an explanation on 114:in response to my comment on 1878:07:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 1860:07:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 1846:07:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC) 1832:00:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC) 1819:00:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC) 1808:22:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC) 1798:22:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC) 1782:11:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC) 1772:11:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC) 1747:02:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC) 1713:12:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC) 1698:07:57, 2 December 2006 (UTC) 1676:07:47, 2 December 2006 (UTC) 1640:01:57, 2 December 2006 (UTC) 1622:23:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1597:09:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1584:09:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1573:01:52, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1168:Journal of Organic Chemistry 1038:11:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 1019:10:55, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 970:13:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC) 949:13:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 931:07:22, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 913:22:28, 16 October 2006 (UTC) 663:I've rewritten the articles 253:Check out my comments here, 2337:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 1292:the SuggestBot request page 965:with a suggestion. Cheers, 822:03:00, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 771:23:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 729:03:15, 18 August 2006 (UTC) 385:My latest struggles are at 2375: 2327:" template to the article 1920:frequently asked questions 1613:is a parental category to 1426:Thanks and best wishes, -- 1287:, SuggestBot's caretaker. 1208:Statistical thermodynamics 1069: 834:Would you please comment? 690:07:45, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 680:06:19, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 654:00:05, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 143:Chinese periodic table AfD 1173: 760:Pariser-Parr-Pople method 696:Islamic Wikiproject Award 626:16:52, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 609:09:26, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 597:08:44, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 587:07:03, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 577:04:57, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 568:03:28, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 554:16:47, 21 July 2006 (UTC) 539:14:59, 21 July 2006 (UTC) 520:03:48, 21 July 2006 (UTC) 515:thomas.robison@gmail. -- 505:21:24, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 466:23:11, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 439:21:38, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 411:21:35, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 200:23:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 190:Organization/Organisation 180:05:37, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 171:03:30, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 162:03:26, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 152:03:20, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 138:09:41, 10 June 2006 (UTC) 2353:speedy deletion criteria 2155:Talk:Valence bond theory 2137:Talk:Valence bond theory 2108:Talk:Valence bond theory 2093:'s theories, in the the 1960:notes on my talk page, " 1252:Diethyl azodicarboxylate 1198:Organometallic chemistry 1133:Chemical Society of Peru 918:Replied to your question 405:http://en.wikipedia.org/ 349:21:45, 8 July 2006 (UTC) 320:23:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC) 306:17:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC) 292:11:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC) 277:08:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC) 262:17:25, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 243:09:16, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 232:06:07, 5 July 2006 (UTC) 211:00:20, 1 July 2006 (UTC) 123:22:32, 6 June 2006 (UTC) 100:17:36, 6 June 2006 (UTC) 78:22:32, 6 June 2006 (UTC) 1314:Introduction to entropy 1088:Fiji Scouts Association 673:Scouting in Rathfarnham 89:Template:Physics Series 1605:Double categorization? 1594:Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 1581:Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 1561:Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 1525:Project mediator offer 1281:SuggestBot's talk page 1239:Ty the Tasmanian Tiger 800:. The final tally was 116:User talk:EnglishScout 2349:Articles for Deletion 1903:) was reverted by an 1609:As far as I can see, 982:I've been working on 975:Fresh set of eyes on 42:of past discussions. 1895:Your recent edit to 1491:Eduardo Reck Miranda 1262:Industrial sociology 1158:Chemical composition 890:Mass-to-charge ratio 884:Mass-to-charge ratio 2095:valence (chemistry) 2074:Valence bond theory 1897:Molecular modelling 1890:Molecular modelling 924:User talk:Mike Peel 775: 544:Scouting in Ontario 175:Yep, La Trobe uni. 129:Baden-Powell Scouts 2287:Physical Chemistry 1760:Michael Billington 1735:Michael Billington 1244:Everett Silvertips 745:Above was by anon 715:Wikiproject awards 617:Scouting Australia 526:Chemical bond/Temp 71:User:Codingmasters 2333:proposed deletion 1269: 1268: 827: 826: 747:User:24.6.185.169 647:Five Red Herrings 112:User:EnglishScout 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2366: 2326: 2320: 2317:I've added the " 2091:Edward Frankland 2003:will be held on 1995:Melbourne meetup 1983:Elmore, Victoria 1950:Scouts Australia 1943:Scouts Australia 1940: 1934: 1719:Melbourne meetup 1690:Category:Guiding 1665:Category:Guiding 1654:Category:Guiding 1648:I wouldn't move 1629:Category:Guiding 1611:Category:Guiding 1395: 1390: 1113:Chemical species 1067: 793: 786: 785: 489: 33: 32: 26: 2374: 2373: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2324: 2318: 2315: 2290: 2239: 2184: 2077: 2034: 1997: 1946: 1938: 1932: 1893: 1790: 1756: 1723: 1607: 1540:(3) means that 1527: 1499:John Vandenberg 1471:John Vandenberg 1467:author:sr-boone 1455: 1411: 1393: 1388: 1383: 1369: 1332: 1330:Portal Scouting 1306: 1283:. Thanks from 1148:Marshall Fixman 1059: 1045: 984:Explorer Scouts 980: 977:Explorer Scouts 967:Colin MacLaurin 956: 938: 920: 906: 886: 863: 832: 784: 736: 699: 677:Jorgenpfhartogs 661: 635: 619: 561: 546: 529: 512: 483: 474: 446: 418: 357: 269: 251: 219: 192: 145: 131: 118:. June 7, 2006. 107: 86: 67: 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 18:User talk:Bduke 12: 11: 5: 2372: 2370: 2314: 2309: 2294:Thermodynamics 2289: 2284: 2238: 2237:Possible libel 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2183: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2076: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2033: 2030: 1996: 1993: 1945: 1936:primarysources 1930: 1892: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1849: 1848: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1822: 1821: 1789: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1755: 1750: 1722: 1716: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1661: 1643: 1642: 1606: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1587: 1586: 1526: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1454: 1451: 1424: 1423: 1420: 1410: 1409:I plead guilty 1407: 1382: 1379: 1368: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1331: 1328: 1305: 1302: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1259: 1254: 1249: 1246: 1241: 1236: 1231: 1228: 1223: 1218: 1216:Phytochemistry 1213: 1210: 1205: 1200: 1195: 1192: 1187: 1182: 1180:Walter Heitler 1177: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1165: 1160: 1155: 1150: 1145: 1140: 1135: 1130: 1125: 1120: 1115: 1110: 1105: 1100: 1095: 1090: 1085: 1080: 1078:Petrochemistry 1075: 1073: 1058: 1055: 1044: 1041: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 979: 973: 955: 952: 937: 934: 919: 916: 905: 900: 885: 882: 862: 859: 858: 857: 847: 846: 841: 831: 828: 825: 824: 794: 783: 774: 751: 750: 735: 732: 703:donkey's yonks 698: 693: 660: 657: 634: 629: 618: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 560: 557: 545: 542: 528: 523: 511: 508: 482: 479: 473: 470: 469: 468: 445: 442: 417: 414: 403:. My CV is at 391: 390: 383: 382: 381: 378: 371: 364: 356: 353: 352: 351: 340: 339: 334: 333: 328: 327: 268: 265: 250: 247: 246: 245: 218: 215: 214: 213: 195:war about :-) 191: 188: 187: 186: 185: 184: 183: 182: 144: 141: 130: 127: 106: 103: 85: 82: 73:June 1, 2006, 66: 63: 61: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2371: 2362: 2361: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2323: 2313: 2310: 2308: 2307: 2304: 2298: 2295: 2288: 2285: 2283: 2282: 2279: 2274: 2273: 2270: 2265: 2264: 2261: 2255: 2254: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2236: 2228: 2225: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2215: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2205: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2194: 2190: 2189:till I'm back 2182:WA Sea scouts 2181: 2177: 2174: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2145: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2124: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2082: 2075: 2072: 2066: 2063: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2054: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2043: 2039: 2031: 2029: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2007: 2002: 1994: 1992: 1991: 1988: 1984: 1979: 1973: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1959: 1954: 1951: 1944: 1937: 1931: 1929: 1928: 1925: 1924:AntiVandalBot 1921: 1917: 1916: 1910: 1906: 1905:automated bot 1902: 1898: 1891: 1888:Your edit to 1887: 1879: 1876: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1861: 1858: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1847: 1844: 1839: 1838: 1833: 1830: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1820: 1817: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1806: 1800: 1799: 1796: 1787: 1783: 1780: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1754: 1749: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1720: 1717: 1715: 1714: 1711: 1699: 1696: 1691: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1677: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1641: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1604: 1598: 1595: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1585: 1582: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1571: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1549: 1547: 1543: 1538: 1536: 1531: 1524: 1516: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1483: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1452: 1450: 1449: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1433: 1432: 1429: 1421: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1408: 1406: 1405: 1402: 1399: 1396: 1391: 1380: 1378: 1377: 1374: 1366: 1360: 1357: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1348: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1338: 1329: 1327: 1326: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1303: 1301: 1300: 1297: 1293: 1288: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1273: 1263: 1260: 1258: 1257:Haber process 1255: 1253: 1250: 1247: 1245: 1242: 1240: 1237: 1235: 1232: 1229: 1227: 1224: 1222: 1219: 1217: 1214: 1211: 1209: 1206: 1204: 1201: 1199: 1196: 1193: 1191: 1188: 1186: 1183: 1181: 1178: 1175: 1174: 1169: 1166: 1164: 1161: 1159: 1156: 1154: 1151: 1149: 1146: 1144: 1141: 1139: 1136: 1134: 1131: 1129: 1126: 1124: 1121: 1119: 1116: 1114: 1111: 1109: 1108:Templeborough 1106: 1104: 1101: 1099: 1096: 1094: 1091: 1089: 1086: 1084: 1081: 1079: 1076: 1074: 1071: 1070: 1068: 1065: 1063: 1056: 1054: 1053: 1050: 1042: 1040: 1039: 1036: 1032: 1020: 1017: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1008: 1004: 1003: 1002: 999: 995: 994: 993: 992: 989: 985: 978: 974: 972: 971: 968: 964: 959: 953: 951: 950: 947: 943: 935: 933: 932: 929: 925: 917: 915: 914: 911: 904: 901: 899: 898: 895: 891: 883: 881: 880: 876: 872: 868: 860: 856: 853: 849: 848: 845: 842: 840: 837: 836: 835: 829: 823: 819: 815: 811: 807: 803: 799: 795: 792: 788: 787: 782: 778: 773: 772: 769: 765: 761: 757: 748: 744: 743: 742: 740: 733: 731: 730: 727: 723: 718: 716: 712: 708: 704: 697: 694: 692: 691: 688: 682: 681: 678: 674: 670: 666: 658: 656: 655: 652: 648: 644: 640: 637:I replied on 633: 630: 628: 627: 624: 616: 610: 607: 604:Please do so 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 595: 589: 588: 585: 579: 578: 575: 570: 569: 566: 558: 556: 555: 552: 543: 541: 540: 537: 534: 527: 524: 522: 521: 518: 509: 507: 506: 502: 498: 494: 490: 488: 480: 478: 472:Sir Alan Budd 471: 467: 464: 459: 458: 457: 455: 454:User:Dcrossle 450: 444:Sir Alan Budd 443: 441: 440: 437: 432: 430: 424: 421: 415: 413: 412: 409: 406: 402: 398: 395: 388: 384: 379: 376: 372: 369: 365: 362: 361: 359: 358: 350: 347: 342: 341: 336: 335: 330: 329: 324: 323: 322: 321: 318: 312: 308: 307: 304: 298: 294: 293: 290: 285: 279: 278: 275: 266: 264: 263: 260: 256: 248: 244: 241: 237: 236: 235: 233: 230: 226: 225: 216: 212: 209: 204: 203: 202: 201: 198: 189: 181: 178: 174: 173: 172: 169: 165: 164: 163: 160: 156: 155: 154: 153: 150: 142: 140: 139: 136: 135:Bookandcoffee 128: 126: 124: 121: 117: 113: 104: 102: 101: 98: 95:. Thank you. 94: 90: 83: 81: 79: 76: 72: 64: 59: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2316: 2299: 2291: 2275: 2266: 2256: 2245: 2242:The National 2241: 2240: 2188: 2185: 2152: 2078: 2035: 2004: 1998: 1974: 1961: 1955: 1947: 1919: 1913: 1904: 1894: 1801: 1791: 1757: 1724: 1706: 1608: 1565:Translations 1564: 1550: 1539: 1528: 1510:. Cheers, -- 1459:Steven Boone 1456: 1453:Steven Boone 1434: 1425: 1412: 1384: 1370: 1333: 1310:Talk:Entropy 1307: 1289: 1276: 1275:If you have 1274: 1270: 1221:Polyethylene 1185:Neuroscience 1060: 1046: 1027: 981: 960: 957: 939: 921: 907: 887: 864: 861:Thanks Brian 833: 801: 752: 737: 719: 700: 683: 662: 639:my talk page 636: 620: 590: 580: 571: 562: 547: 530: 513: 491: 484: 475: 451: 447: 436:FrankLambert 433: 428: 425: 422: 419: 408:FrankLambert 399: 396: 392: 313: 309: 299: 295: 280: 270: 257:. Thanks! -- 252: 222: 220: 193: 146: 132: 108: 87: 68: 55: 43: 37: 2163:Sadi Carnot 2141:Sadi Carnot 2099:Sadi Carnot 2062:HappyCamper 2042:HappyCamper 2011:Lower House 2006:18 December 1721:in planning 1546:User:Rlevse 1535:User:Rlevse 1226:Bailrigg FM 1212:Add Sources 1118:Chi-tang ho 1093:Be Prepared 1049:HappyCamper 871:Sarah Ewart 669:14th Dublin 665:13th Dublin 659:14th Dublin 651:Stefán Ingi 632:Gaudy Night 346:SteveWolfer 303:SteveWolfer 274:SteveWolfer 36:This is an 2032:Ambassador 1915:Click here 1318:dave souza 1296:SuggestBot 1062:SuggestBot 958:Hi Bduke, 533:Physchim62 481:RfA thanks 1909:vandalism 1788:Schaeffer 1727:this list 1441:Smokefoot 1428:Smokefoot 1367:Chemistry 1285:ForteTuba 1035:Horus Kol 1016:Horus Kol 1007:Horus Kol 988:Horus Kol 928:Mike Peel 429:disorder' 229:rant-line 217:RfA offer 97:Srleffler 2244:and the 2214:SatuSuro 2193:SatuSuro 1967:Longhair 1958:SatuSuro 1768:contribs 1743:contribs 1437:Sbharris 1435:To both 1373:Monaco10 1277:feedback 1153:Ontogeny 810:feedback 606:SatuSuro 584:SatuSuro 565:SatuSuro 501:contribs 224:Blnguyen 2303:James S 2269:Masalai 2260:Masalai 2250:Masalai 2191:thanks 2116:Valency 2112:Valence 1941:tag on 1875:JoshuaZ 1857:JoshuaZ 1829:JoshuaZ 1816:JoshuaZ 1795:JoshuaZ 1652:out of 1304:Entropy 1203:Geodesy 1176:Cleanup 1043:Message 894:Nick Y. 814:Deville 777:Deville 517:Tjr9898 493:Samsara 177:Viridae 159:Viridae 149:Viridae 39:archive 2357:Oo7565 2339:" and 2019:bainer 2001:meetup 1710:Rlevse 1673:jergen 1619:jergen 1570:Rlevse 1557:Jergen 1419:depth. 1356:Rlevse 1337:Rlevse 1248:Expand 1230:Wikify 946:Rlevse 802:72/1/0 717:page. 707:WP:PUA 623:Rlevse 551:Rlevse 536:(talk) 416:"P.S." 197:Nomist 105:Scouts 65:thanks 2278:Bduke 2224:Bduke 2204:Bduke 2173:Bduke 2159:table 2120:Bduke 2081:Bduke 2053:Bduke 2009:, at 1987:Bduke 1963:media 1843:Bduke 1805:Bduke 1779:Bduke 1695:Bduke 1667:) on 1637:Bduke 1553:Evrik 1542:Bduke 1530:Bduke 1512:Bduke 1482:Bduke 1445:Bduke 1401:arris 1347:Bduke 1194:Merge 1072:Stubs 998:Bduke 936:Check 910:Chris 852:evrik 768:Bduke 764:ZINDO 726:evrik 687:Bduke 594:Bduke 574:Bduke 463:Bduke 317:Bduke 289:Bduke 259:evrik 240:Bduke 208:Bduke 168:Bduke 120:Bduke 75:Bduke 16:< 2322:prod 2161:. -- 2139:. -- 2114:and 2023:talk 1918:for 1901:diff 1764:talk 1739:talk 1439:and 1322:talk 875:Talk 818:Talk 671:and 559:RAOU 497:talk 2015:map 1956:As 1660:#3. 1495:Afd 867:RfA 830:FYI 806:mop 798:RfA 781:RfA 779:'s 2355:. 2325:}} 2319:{{ 2222:-- 2202:-- 2025:) 1969:\ 1939:}} 1933:{{ 1803:-- 1770:) 1766:• 1745:) 1741:• 1559:, 1555:, 1320:, 944:. 877:) 850:-- 820:) 734:Hi 667:, 503:) 499:• 456:. 287:-- 234:. 227:| 206:-- 125:) 80:) 2021:( 1899:( 1762:( 1737:( 1493:/ 1398:H 1394:B 1389:S 873:( 816:( 749:. 495:( 377:) 370:, 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index