User talk:Benea/archive6 - Knowledge (XXG)

2713:

abundant, and allowed the Admiralty to save oak for the larger warships where the greater expenditure involved in building them, and the greater punishment they were designed to withstand as the stood in the line of battle, meant that oak was vastly preferred. This was not such a concern for the smaller sloops and frigates. Fir and pine ships were also quicker to build (compare Boreas's three months from laying down to launching compared to her oak-built sisters that sometimes took the better part of a year). The downside of course was that fir and pine ships were less durable, often required greater time under refit and repair, and tended to have a lifespan of half that of an oak-built equivalent. The trade off was to have ships in service faster, and often for less money, an important consideration in wartime. In writing about the Coventry class, I think I'd stress the speed of building rather than the cost, the fir and oak built ships of the class ended up carrying fairly similar price tags. The Admiralty had sought tenders from civilian contractors, but ended up rejecting a bid of £9 per ton (equivalent to the cost of an oak built ship), suggesting that price was still in their mind, but that they also wanted to get ships into service to supplement the navy during the Seven Years War.

2636:

preserve info rather than throw it away, especially if the reason for throwing it away is some sense of neatness. I also disagree with your wholesale reverting of my edits to the Nelson page. Most were legitimate improvements in style, doing away with passive voice constructions and unnecessary words. Your point about the action at Mortella Point is valid, but there is something to be said for making substantive links to other stories. If there is a way to create a footnote to the sentence one could legitimately put the paragraph you deleted there.

950:

rate frigate, you could link both 'fifth rate' and 'frigate', but if the following Acasta was also a fifth rate frigate, the terms would stay unlinked. The way the pages are set out to include only specific types of information, there should usually only be a need to link the ship class name and type, or similar, after the specific ship link. However if more information is deemed appropriate, then they can be linked as well, as with how one of the Acasta entries links to the Scharnhorst and Gneisenau.

2068:

case dab either by ship type (which is usually the rig) in brackets (Vancouver (brig), Vancouver (ship), Vancouver (yacht)) if its a private civilian vessel/merchant etc, or if it's a navy vessel either use the standard prefix adopted by that nation (HMS Vancouver, USS Vancouver) or if that nation does not use a naval prefix, use the formula set out in the guidelines and title 'nationality:type:name' (Russian brig Vancouver, French battleship Vancouver, etc). Follow?

3229: 31: 2656:) so it's not really acceptable to use them to hold detailed or specific information about specific ships. Stub articles are better as they can be filled out later. Look at how substantial the article is now for instance. I have not done any 'whole-sale reverts' to your Nelson edits, most is still as you've written it. I have however fixed broken formatting, reverted changes of legitimate British English variations ( 3039: 2949: 2794: 2289: 2128: 1945: 1889: 1843: 1787: 1741: 1695: 1649: 1603: 1557: 1417: 1333: 1113: 1006: 850: 794: 738: 566: 509: 452: 95: 2575:

here to dab from the launch year-dabbed title to the pennant number dabbed-one. In all cases though the dabbing element should be concealed in the article, making the definitiveness a moot point as far as these sorts of articles go. You could also link the U boats in the article as well, and I notice several other British ships are not linked. Is there any reason for this?

1059: 697: 659: 920:, what are the conventions on links per line? For a DAB page, I'd usually have one link per line with the understanding that the necessary level of detail is found in the main articles (MOS:DAB states that the reason is to simplify choices for the reader on what page to go to); the example at the ship index pages also has one link per line, but is not specific. 630:) I did a lot of searching before I found that stub. Not until I read that Knowledge (XXG) only allowed fair-use claims in the article namespace did I realize this wasn't about Fair-Use, but instead making sure use was in line with wikipedia's own guidelines for use of commercial images (intentionally narrower than rights granted under Fair Use). 372:

small, could have a little detail on Nelson's column. Bradman is big because of its references, the main stat people look at is readable prose size which for Bradman is 9,000 words. Nelson is a relatively major ('high') biographical figure so can justify a high length. I've just read it all through and it does remain focussed.

2660:), and other changes that you made, which while I'm sure were in good faith, were against policy. As to the Mortella Tower portion, a footnote is a possibility. The Nelson article is very long, an issue brought up at recent reviews, so since the attack is only very tangentially related to Nelson, its relevance is questionable. 2846:

FYI. I have created a stub for this vessel. She had a great history, particularly when she assisted Dido in the great frigate encounter with Minerve and Artemis(?), but as my interest is really only through her connection to the origins of the Martello towers, I probably won't be getting to fleshing

2574:

page. The others I left as they were. I'd suggest when writing articles to check if the article already exists and if so at what title, because that way you can avoid linking through redirects unnecessarily, and otherwise to use the redlink shown on the class page, though redirects will help you out

2553:

PS I’ve got to say I can’t see the point of using the pennant number anyway, unless we are dealing with a huge class of ships built in the same year (like the Flowers or the DE’s); otherwise the year of launch is more definitive, which the guideline at Naming convention (ship) indicates. But that’s

2067:

Yep, per navies. For private vessels continue as you have been, i.e first look at its name (e.g. Vancouver). Motor vessels and steamships can be dabbed adequately with the type prefix (SS Vancouver, RMS Vancouver, MV Vancouver, MS Vancouver, etc). Sailing ships don't tend to have prefixes so in this

2635:

Thanks for fixing various links. That said, I don't see what is gained by creating a stub page, which I have now done, when a short paragraph on a disambiguation page is enough to cover the topic. Had I not created the page, your edit could have caused the info to be lost. I generally prefer to

2536:

I noticed you’d changed the redlinks for the destroyers here from year of launch to pennant number; Just what is the guideline on this? I thought I’d seen a conversation that said ships prior to WWII would use year of launch, and post WWII used pennant number. And the redlinks I got from the

1238:

No problem, good to see you about again! Done most of them, the River class destroyers Doon and Stour are the only ones listed for those names, aside for some requisitioned wartime trawlers, so you can probably handle them with a redirect, at least for now ;) Feel free to ask for more anytime, and

404:

The significance of his school friends was brought up in the review. While Sugden does make a glancing mention of Hansen and another of Nelson's school day friends, he doesn't really feature in Nelson's life. There are hundreds of minor personalities who feature in Nelson's story who played a more

371:

I hadn't looked for anything specific yet. I'm guessing the main things would normally be impact on naval tactics though understand his weren't used much after his death. Impact it had on strategic naval situation is mentioned elsewhere. Basically a few lines to summarise legacy section seems too

2712:

It's a little of both interestingly enough. Oak was the preferred building material for warships, as it was tougher and more durable. It was however more expensive, and stocks in Britain were scarce and carefully controlled. Alternative materials, such as fir and pine were generally cheaper, more

1996:

There is a body of evidence in the main article which clearly shows that Churchill organized and ordered the bombing. Harris's good name has been tarnished for long enough. It is time that the truth is told in Knowledge (XXG). I know that you are a person who loves England and will defend it. But

949:

That's fine. The guidelines are probably due for a revamping and further discussion at some point anyway. As to the number of links per line, there's no limit as long as the general guidelines for links are followed, i.e. only relevant ones, and don't repeat them. So if one HMS Acasta was a fifth

172:

Yes, a C-1-S-AY1 type to be exact. The designation was applied to 13 ships built for the USMC as variants of the C-1 type by CSC of Wilmington, and transferred to Britain as infantry landing ships. These ships were the ex-Capes Argos, St Vincent, Berkeley, Marshall, Washington, Compass, Cormorin,

633:

Do you have suggestions of where I should create alternate layout suggestions for an article? I'd like to be able to link to multiple layout consideration on an article's talk page, but don't think the talk page is particularly appropriate location to duplicate multiple layouts of main article

338:

Hi Benea, the Nelson article has about 11,000 words of readable prose, this might need to be cut. also legacy section is short: i know someone said to move it off into another section during the peer review but the reduction seems to have gone too far, i'm sure it needs a longer summary,

2924:'s 'going to London with his captain's barge on a cart' mentality. The trouble is while reading up on one officer, I stumble across another equally eccentric or deserving of an article. Britain just seemed to churn them out during this period it seems! Thanks again for your compliment! 405:

significant role in his life, and there is also the issue of just how close Hansen and Nelson were, or was Hansen trying to capitalise on an old acquaintance with England's premier naval hero. I agree it's interesting, but I think it borders on the trivial in an already long biography.

2569:

There has been no definitive decision made on this. I'm afraid your comment isn't totally accurate though. One of the two links I changed was to a ship page that existed dabbed by the pennant number (Defender), and the other, Walker, I altered the red link to match up with that on the

324:, used the cite template, and I assumed that was a preferred style. I had meant to go back through and change them all to use the template, but since you've changed them all to not use it, and since there is no one preferred over the other, then I have no issue with it. 2768:

Yes, both captured on virtually the same day of the year, by the same ship! Quite a coincidence. It fooled Michael Phillips into confusing the two on his usually excellent website, though interestingly enough he has the basic details right on the entry for the Valeur.

2397:

The details for Inverlyon are on page 176. As to dates, using 'in service/out of service' would seem to be the best way to word it. As to armament Colledge only lists the 6 pdr. This doesn't necessarily rule out a three pounder at some point, but could be significant.

2696:

Interesting re fir vs oak. Was the expedient inspired by cost or availability of oak? In either case, we/I should slip in a phrase that reflects that info. Would help non-specialist readers such as I understand a little more about the era of the

1486:, feel free to add to it. One thing that's come across my radar is that he was apparently MP for Dunwich between 1678 and February 1679, a fact I'm currently unable to confirm through the sources I have to hand. Perhaps you can clarify this? ttfn, 964:

Ah, thanks. When you do re-vamp the guidelines, a note about "no limit to links per line" might be good because of the overlap with MOS:DAB that specifies one link per line (I think anyway, but I'm a huge fan of overly-explicit guidelines).

3114:

I spotted that, and had fixed it before you posted here, we must have passed like ships in the night! It was the 1797 battle, linked directly in the text, but I must have missed it in the infobox. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.

2651:

I've rewritten the article, so it's not a stub. I had nearly completed it as a new article prior to your drafting the stub, so there was no intention of losing the information. Also disambiguation pages are covered by stringent guidelines

2264:

Please put in the basic framework, i.e. start each page with the appropriate title and put in the links, and I shall endeavour to add the individual vessel's data and relevent history, or at least join in your efforts to do so.

2904:

I just wanted to drop a line to say that the article, which you linked to in the DYK suggestions page, was one of the best I've read in a long while. It doesn't hurt that Philimore seems to have been quite the rogue. Good job!

1533:, which normally mentions every officer elected to a Parliamenmtary seat, doesn't give this. I shall look in the multi-volume History of Parliament next time I'm in the National Library of Aberystwyth, but it may be some time. 181:, Lance, Mace, Rapier and Spearhead when transferred to the MOWT. Broadsword and Javelin were sunk, the survivors were later commissioned into the RN, in many cases reusing names previously allocated to the First World War era 319:

I added them both ways, previously the very few cites the article had were mostly unformatted as I recall. I changed from one style to another halfway through because another article I was working up to FA at the time,

1462:

connection. Could you kindly put in the outline of an article on Adm. Sir Thomas Allin, which I can then expand? I'm sure you have basic details for him. Don't forget to include in the references the two volumes of

2245:. And I haven't even put anything in the list from before 1815! And then there's the Torpedo Boats ... Heigh-ho, at least it means I can pick the ones that interest me for the first thirty years or so. Yours, 1376:

Fabulous job expanding and cleaning this up! I just cobbled together something quickly from what I could find on the web, but now it looks great - you obviously have good references on-hand and know your stuff.

626:. Although your reasoning seems plain "removing wp:fairuse images, that can't be used on userpages/subpages like these" it would've been nice if you included a link to where this guideline was defined in ( 912:, I've made the year/hull(/pennant?) numbers visible, changed the word "scrapping" to "scrap", adjusted a couple links (i.e. ] instead of ] ] and some other minor ones) and added a google books link to the 2242: 419:

I understand, fair enough. btw notes, refs don't count towards readable prose size though given how long some of the articles out there are hopefully length won't be an issue here.

268:: basically use your judgement. If it isn't blatant vandalism then don't use rollback, other than that, not much to it. :) If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask. Regards. 635: 2052:

was not an HMS ,but on royal commission/ not officially navy, or was it? I gatyher you must mean only military vssels, toherwise there's hosts of articles in need of renaming....

2012:

Wallie, at this rate you are heading for a block, can I urge you to address the issues, cite this 'good body of evidence' and stop pressing accusations of bias and claims of POV.

1392:

Thanks very much, and thanks for giving me the impetus to finally tackle him (he's been on my list a while!) I'll try and work in more details and sources over the next few days.

304:

i've left a note on talk page. When adding refs suggest you use style already in article, well done on adding them all btw, I'll try and help you getting it to FA if I can,

2492: 627: 638:

but thought you might have a suggestion of where I might be able to actually create a layout including FU images that wasn't ready to be published as a full article.

2223:

I know...fills me with dread how many more ships there out there to write when a fairly innocuous name turns out to have such a history! I think the record is still

3153:

Hi, I've just expanded this article a bit, and tagged it as needing references improving. I notice you created it, could you give it a look over and add some refs?

2847:

it out further any time soon. For that matter, Dido deserves a page too. I know you have a lot on your plate but I thought that I would at least mention this.

1501:

Many thanks, Ben! I shall see if I can add to the article, although it seems very comprehensive. Perhaps I can add to his service history; His appointment to the

2088:

I seem to be having some trouble with my personal emai accounts at the moment, I've now temporarily changed the address to my work one, so could you try again?

2589:

You're right, sorry; my mistake. I was getting a little confused by the end of this; a lot of the V&W's were year of launch and I sort of went with that.

2495:. It will run some time on April 1, 2009. Thank you for such an interesting hook! The 5 day old articles limit is waved for that day, so it is eligible. 3062:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2972:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2817:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2312:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2151:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1968:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1912:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1866:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1810:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1764:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1718:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1672:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1626:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1580:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1440:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1356:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1136:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1029:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 873:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 817:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 761:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 589:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 532:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 475:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 118:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 909: 249:

rights? Do you want them so you can revert those pesky vandals that little bit quicker? If you do, just leave a note on my talkpage. Best regards.

3263: 1759: 1621: 1575: 3098:

wikilinks in it, but I need help with one. Since you created the article, I figured you might know enough to help. The link in question is

1805: 2307: 1435: 1063: 904:

Apologies for mis-understanding the ship set index, and thanks for pointing me to the right guidelines. I've made a couple minor

2611:

No problem, I thought it was something like that. I've added a few myself to other U-boats, RN ships and convoys. Happy editing!

2530: 1963: 1907: 812: 663: 2491:

I am pulling the article from the current set of queues because the hook is so excellent that I want to save it for our annual

756: 619: 1467:

edited by R.C. (Roger Charles) Anderson and published by the Navy Records Society in 1939 (vol.1) and 1940 (vol.2). Thanks.

2344: 1861: 1483: 1070:

has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

708:

has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

670:

has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

3045: 2955: 2800: 2295: 2134: 1951: 1895: 1849: 1793: 1747: 1701: 1655: 1609: 1563: 1423: 1339: 1119: 1012: 856: 800: 744: 572: 515: 458: 101: 470: 3236: 3063: 2973: 2818: 2313: 2152: 1969: 1913: 1867: 1811: 1765: 1719: 1673: 1627: 1581: 1441: 1357: 1137: 1030: 874: 818: 762: 590: 533: 476: 119: 38: 1260:

Your new article on the above states that the second ship was broken up in two different years? Is this an error?

3099: 2108: 2093: 973: 928: 2514:

Absolutely fine by me! I was rather hoping it would be saved to be honest, I thought it made neat little hook.

2348: 3011:

was in March 1904, because I gave the composition of the Mediterranean Fleet in March 1904 in the article on

2571: 2354:. Do you have a page number or numbers in Colledge that I can cite? Also, is the mention of a 6-pounder the 2039: 1351: 218: 57: 3038: 2948: 2920:

Thanks! It was good fun writing him, I'd been meaning to get around to him for some time, following up on

2890: 2793: 2288: 2270: 2127: 1944: 1888: 1842: 1786: 1740: 1694: 1648: 1602: 1556: 1538: 1521:

19 July 1665 - staying with the latter until 7 December 1666. On 18 October 1667 he was appointed to the

1472: 1416: 1382: 1332: 1112: 1005: 849: 793: 737: 565: 508: 451: 94: 623: 173:

Gregory, Lobos, Pine, St Roque, Turner and Giradeau. They became the Empires Anvil, Arquebus, Battleaxe,

3050: 2960: 2878: 2832: 2805: 2300: 2139: 2028: 1956: 1900: 1854: 1798: 1752: 1706: 1660: 1614: 1568: 1428: 1344: 1170:

because it only has 12 inline citations so any you can add to get it up to B would be very cool, cheers

1124: 1017: 861: 805: 749: 577: 520: 463: 106: 265: 246: 210: 206: 2043: 2867: 2852: 2758: 2736: 2702: 2679: 2641: 2502: 2104: 2089: 1926: 1370: 1284:, but accidentally left that date in after reworking it for the Tests. Thanks for pointing that out! 1175: 868: 424: 395: 381: 353:

I'd rather it not be. Length is not an issue as long as it remains focussed, we're still 15kb behind

344: 309: 202: 174: 113: 2986: 2753:

Great catch. That explains the inconsistencies in the description of the vessel - 20 vs. 28 guns.

2473: 2417: 2382: 2363: 2326: 1982: 1160: 1094: 1081: 1024: 719: 681: 198: 186: 144: 2657: 2653: 978: 933: 214: 3198: 3183: 3077: 3012: 2910: 2451: 2250: 2214: 2199: 2191: 2166: 2057: 1228: 1150: 1043: 887: 831: 775: 604: 584: 547: 490: 321: 222: 194: 76: 225:. Rapier was to have been given the name Sir Visto, but this was not subsequently carried out. 3158: 2967: 2886: 2394:

Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration at line 2083: attempt to index a boolean value.

2266: 2187: 1667: 1534: 1468: 1378: 1072: 1067: 710: 705: 672: 667: 190: 178: 162: 129: 1223:? It seems rather a long list, but then I have been rather quiet for a while! All the best, 3020: 2828: 2602: 2559: 2544: 2443: 2103:

Ah, it automatically disables it when you change email address. Should be re-enabled now.

2002: 913: 643: 527: 3207:

Always on the alert! Far fewer ships with that name than I would have anticipated as well.

3095: 981: 936: 373: 3245: 3212: 3144: 3131: 3120: 3104: 3088: 3057: 2929: 2863: 2848: 2774: 2754: 2732: 2718: 2698: 2675: 2665: 2637: 2616: 2580: 2519: 2497: 2403: 2232: 2073: 2046:, just trying to pick an example (that was an HBC ship, I may have dabbed it wrong). The 2017: 1922: 1824: 1491: 1397: 1308: 1289: 1266: 1244: 1171: 955: 420: 410: 391: 377: 376:

is 14,000 words and someone's noted it as long but people haven't said it's too long yet.

362: 340: 329: 305: 287: 273: 254: 230: 47: 17: 390:

Hi Benea, wondered why you deleted school material? thought it seemed quite interesting,

2731:

Interesting. Thanks for the info. Now to get that into a phrase, or at most a sentence.

2982: 2469: 2413: 2378: 2359: 2322: 2146: 1978: 1090: 1077: 715: 677: 354: 182: 2358:

weapon mentioned, or does Colledge also list the 3-pounder? Many thanks in advance. —

3257: 3194: 3179: 3073: 2906: 2462: 2447: 2246: 2210: 2195: 2162: 2053: 1713: 1224: 1146: 1131: 1039: 970: 925: 883: 827: 771: 701: 600: 543: 486: 72: 1076:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

714:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

676:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

3154: 2921: 2885:! I thought we already had an article on this vessel, although I can't be certain. 2812: 1529:, from 25 March to 28 August 1678. I cannot confirm whether he was an MP yet - the 618:

Hi, you deleted a gallery of a couple characters from futurama, which I created at

158: 150: 3244:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3175: 3016: 2598: 2555: 2540: 2224: 2183: 2048: 1998: 1281: 1201: 1193: 639: 68: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3216: 3208: 3202: 3187: 3162: 3135: 3124: 3116: 3108: 3081: 3024: 3004: 2990: 2933: 2925: 2914: 2894: 2871: 2856: 2836: 2778: 2770: 2762: 2740: 2722: 2714: 2706: 2683: 2669: 2661: 2645: 2620: 2612: 2606: 2584: 2576: 2563: 2548: 2523: 2515: 2508: 2484: 2477: 2455: 2439: 2421: 2407: 2399: 2386: 2367: 2330: 2274: 2254: 2236: 2228: 2218: 2203: 2170: 2112: 2097: 2077: 2069: 2061: 2021: 2013: 2006: 1986: 1930: 1828: 1820: 1542: 1495: 1487: 1476: 1401: 1393: 1386: 1315: 1303: 1293: 1285: 1273: 1261: 1248: 1240: 1232: 1179: 1154: 1098: 1085: 1058: 1047: 988: 959: 951: 943: 891: 835: 779: 723: 696: 685: 658: 647: 608: 551: 494: 428: 414: 406: 399: 385: 366: 358: 348: 333: 325: 313: 291: 283: 277: 269: 258: 250: 234: 226: 166: 80: 3094:

Hi, and thanks for your great work on this article. I'm currently working on

2597:

there, I just haven't got round to checking them yet. It's nothing sinister.

1213: 2241:

I've been getting the same dread when I look at the number of red links in

1525:, with which he remained until 30 April 1669. His last ship was the later 1218: 1209: 1205: 1197: 966: 921: 3174:

Could I please impose once more for a ship index page (if required) on

917: 357:. What specifically would you want to include from the legacy article? 916:

in Colledge. Understanding that the set index pages aren't bound by

3102:- there seem to be two Britain-related potential targets. Thanks. - 622:

as a demonstration of an alternate layout for the first section of

3193:

You certainly don't hang about, do you? Thanks very much indeed.

245:

Hi there Benea, just noticed on Nelson's page that you don't have

2373:

Oh, also, should the dates you have be in/out of service, or was

3223: 2461:

Since we're already imposing on you, Benea, how about one for

2209:

Thanks - who would have thought there would be quite so many?

1280:

Yes, my mistake, I copied and pasted the basic structure from

25: 2034:

How can that be right? Or do you mean only in reference to

1191:

Would you mind having a quick look in Colledge for HM Ships

910:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Ships/Guidelines#Index pages

2243:

List of gunboat and gunvessel classes of the Royal Navy

905: 1053:

DYK nomination of John Maitland (Royal Navy officer)

628:

Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content criteria exemptions

636:

Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content_criteria_exemptions

67:Dear Benea, could you create a Ship Index page for 653:DYK nomination of Sir Edward Hamilton, 1st Baronet 2377:truly commissioned? I'm guessing the former. — 264:Done, make sure you have read all the rules on 374:Knowledge (XXG):Fac#History_of_the_Han_Dynasty 2877:Hopefully, Ben, this has been a reference to 2674:Fair enough. Great job on the new Juno page. 2182:Could you please do me a Ship Index page for 1997:this shouldn't mean you suppress the truth. 1732:DYK for Richard Dacres (British Army officer) 8: 1302:No problem, keep up the great work! Regards 1778:DYK for Richard Dacres (Royal Navy officer) 1531:List of Commissioned Sea Officers 1660-1815 614:Deleting picture links in my User namespace 3033: 2943: 2788: 2283: 2280:DYK for Thomas Dundas (Royal Navy officer) 2122: 1939: 1883: 1837: 1781: 1735: 1689: 1643: 1597: 1551: 1465:The Journals of Sir Thomas Allin 1660-1678 1411: 1408:DYK for John Maitland (Royal Navy officer) 1327: 1107: 1000: 844: 788: 732: 560: 503: 446: 89: 3054:was updated with a fact from the article 2964:was updated with a fact from the article 2809:was updated with a fact from the article 2304:was updated with a fact from the article 2143:was updated with a fact from the article 1960:was updated with a fact from the article 1904:was updated with a fact from the article 1858:was updated with a fact from the article 1802:was updated with a fact from the article 1756:was updated with a fact from the article 1710:was updated with a fact from the article 1664:was updated with a fact from the article 1618:was updated with a fact from the article 1572:was updated with a fact from the article 1505:was on 15 April 1664, not 1663. From the 1432:was updated with a fact from the article 1348:was updated with a fact from the article 1128:was updated with a fact from the article 1021:was updated with a fact from the article 865:was updated with a fact from the article 809:was updated with a fact from the article 753:was updated with a fact from the article 581:was updated with a fact from the article 524:was updated with a fact from the article 467:was updated with a fact from the article 110:was updated with a fact from the article 1936:DYK for Sir Charles Knowles, 1st Baronet 1880:DYK for Sir Charles Knowles, 2nd Baronet 1876:Gatoclass 03:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 1594:DYK for James Richard Dacres (1788–1853) 1548:DYK for James Richard Dacres (1749–1810) 1089:Benea, it is your volume number again. 785:DYK for Sir Edward Hamilton, 1st Baronet 177:, Crossbow, Cutlass, Gauntlet, Halberd, 2827:Hi, thanks for the contribution, Benea 2438:Another Ship Index request - this time 2194:, that can't be right! Yours, as ever, 2038:(and not private vessels)?? Otherwise 1774:Gatoclass 05:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 1728:Gatoclass 05:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 1682:Gatoclass 05:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 1636:Gatoclass 05:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 1590:Gatoclass 05:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 1450:Gatoclass 21:41, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 1366:Gatoclass 15:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 729:DYK for Hugh Pigot (Royal Navy captain) 3242:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2593:As for the ship and U boat links that 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2493:April Fool's Day Did You Know section 1834:DYK for Sir Thomas Allin, 1st Baronet 1760:Richard Dacres (British Army officer) 7: 2392: 443:DYK for Grangemouth Dockyard Company 143:. She was built at the same yard as 2442:, which is currently a redirect to 2343:Hey, Benea, I saw your note on the 1806:Richard Dacres (Royal Navy officer) 2412:Great. Thanks for the info. :) — 2308:Thomas Dundas (Royal Navy officer) 1436:John Maitland (Royal Navy officer) 1064:John Maitland (Royal Navy officer) 24: 3015:, which I am trying to improve.-- 3227: 3037: 2947: 2792: 2531:Donald Macintyre (naval officer) 2287: 2126: 1964:Sir Charles Knowles, 1st Baronet 1943: 1908:Sir Charles Knowles, 2nd Baronet 1887: 1841: 1785: 1739: 1693: 1647: 1622:James Richard Dacres (1788–1853) 1601: 1576:James Richard Dacres (1749–1810) 1555: 1458:Ben, thanks for clearing up the 1415: 1331: 1111: 1057: 1004: 848: 813:Sir Edward Hamilton, 1st Baronet 792: 736: 695: 664:Sir Edward Hamilton, 1st Baronet 657: 564: 507: 450: 93: 29: 1324:DYK for Charles Powell Hamilton 757:Hugh Pigot (Royal Navy captain) 691:DYK nomination of Richard Bligh 620:User:Petree/Futurama Characters 1509:he was transfered back to the 634:content. I may take it up on 1: 3264:User pages with script errors 3007:. I needed to know what the 2539:Can you clarify this for me? 2204:22:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 2186:? It currently redirects to 2171:07:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 2113:16:37, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 2098:14:07, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 2078:00:33, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 2062:00:22, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 2022:16:50, 21 February 2009 (UTC) 2007:16:45, 21 February 2009 (UTC) 1987:05:01, 21 February 2009 (UTC) 1931:01:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC) 1862:Sir Thomas Allin, 1st Baronet 1829:03:52, 17 February 2009 (UTC) 1513:on 26 June 1664, then to the 1484:Sir Thomas Allin, 1st Baronet 1482:I've worked up an article at 1239:keep up the good work! ttfn, 1068:Did You Know nominations page 706:Did You Know nominations page 668:Did You Know nominations page 282:Thanks awfully! Best wishes, 1543:07:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 1496:20:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 1477:09:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 1402:00:41, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 1387:18:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 1316:21:34, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 1294:18:35, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 1274:18:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 1249:17:45, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 1233:23:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 1180:12:13, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 1155:02:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 1099:01:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 1086:01:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 1048:13:41, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 989:15:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 960:15:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 944:13:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 892:13:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 841:DYK for HMS Albemarle (1779) 836:06:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 780:06:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC) 724:23:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC) 686:17:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 648:17:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 609:05:44, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 552:05:44, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 495:05:41, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 471:Grangemouth Dockyard Company 429:14:19, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 415:12:25, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 400:12:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 386:17:44, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 367:15:46, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 349:15:36, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 334:13:07, 12 January 2009 (UTC) 314:12:39, 12 January 2009 (UTC) 292:18:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 278:17:57, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 259:17:48, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 86:DYK for Alexander John Scott 997:DYK for George Miller Bligh 235:09:07, 9 January 2009 (UTC) 167:09:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC) 81:19:34, 3 January 2009 (UTC) 3280: 3217:15:13, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3203:15:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3188:14:22, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3163:07:18, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 3136:06:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 3125:21:04, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 3109:18:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 3082:15:34, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 3025:21:17, 22 March 2009 (UTC) 3003:Thanks for your help with 2991:11:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2934:23:28, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 2915:20:03, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 2895:12:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2872:00:09, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2857:00:22, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 2837:21:14, 19 March 2009 (UTC) 2779:15:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 2763:15:38, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 2741:20:56, 15 March 2009 (UTC) 2723:19:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC) 2707:17:56, 15 March 2009 (UTC) 2684:03:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC) 2670:03:51, 14 March 2009 (UTC) 2646:03:42, 14 March 2009 (UTC) 2621:23:31, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 2607:18:23, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 2585:17:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 2564:14:40, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 2549:14:37, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 2524:01:10, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 2509:00:12, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 2478:16:11, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 2275:12:36, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 1517:16 June 1665, then to the 1166:it's staggeringly only at 1062:Hello! Your submission of 700:Hello! Your submission of 662:Hello! Your submission of 557:DYK for SS Empire Clansman 3100:Battle of Cape St Vincent 3087:Disambiguation needed on 2940:DYK for HMS Castor (1785) 2456:11:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC) 2422:15:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 2408:14:38, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 2387:11:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 2368:11:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 2331:10:54, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 2255:22:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 2237:19:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 2219:12:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC) 1640:DYK for Barrington Dacres 976:Knowledge (XXG)'s rules: 931:Knowledge (XXG)'s rules: 500:DYK for SS Empire Arthur 3064:Did you know? talk page 3030:DYK for John Phillimore 2974:Did you know? talk page 2819:Did you know? talk page 2572:V and W class destroyer 2314:Did you know? talk page 2153:Did you know? talk page 1970:Did you know? talk page 1914:Did you know? talk page 1868:Did you know? talk page 1812:Did you know? talk page 1766:Did you know? talk page 1720:Did you know? talk page 1674:Did you know? talk page 1628:Did you know? talk page 1582:Did you know? talk page 1442:Did you know? talk page 1358:Did you know? talk page 1352:Charles Powell Hamilton 1138:Did you know? talk page 1073:your nomination's entry 1031:Did you know? talk page 875:Did you know? talk page 819:Did you know? talk page 763:Did you know? talk page 711:your nomination's entry 673:your nomination's entry 591:Did you know? talk page 534:Did you know? talk page 477:Did you know? talk page 120:Did you know? talk page 2842:HMS Lowescroffe (1761) 2190:, and since I'm doing 2119:DYK for William Prowse 2040:British brig Vancouver 71:? Thanks in advance, 3240:of past discussions. 2879:HMS Lowestoffe (1761) 2862:Outstanding. Thanks. 2029:Russian frigate Oryol 1992:Churchill and Dresden 1686:DYK for Sydney Dacres 1104:DYK for Richard Bligh 157:also a Type C1 ship? 58:User:Billy/Archivenav 42:of past discussions. 2785:DYK for Henry Paulet 1371:Andrew Snape Douglas 1185:Ship Indices request 869:HMS Albemarle (1779) 114:Alexander John Scott 1161:Battle of Trafalgar 1025:George Miller Bligh 624:Futurama Characters 3168:Ship Index request 3013:HMS Leander (1882) 2432:Ship Index request 2396: 2192:HMS Fortune (1913) 2176:Ship Index request 1311:Let’s have a chat. 1269:Let’s have a chat. 585:SS Empire Clansman 322:HMS Ark Royal (91) 63:Ship Index request 3252: 3251: 3246:current talk page 3070: 3069: 2980: 2979: 2968:HMS Castor (1785) 2825: 2824: 2692:HMS Boreas (1757) 2446:. Thanks again, 2391:The details are: 2320: 2319: 2188:HMS Fortune (H70) 2159: 2158: 2135:February 26, 2009 1976: 1975: 1952:February 21, 2009 1920: 1919: 1896:February 17, 2009 1874: 1873: 1850:February 13, 2009 1818: 1817: 1772: 1771: 1726: 1725: 1680: 1679: 1668:Barrington Dacres 1634: 1633: 1588: 1587: 1448: 1447: 1364: 1363: 1144: 1143: 1037: 1036: 977: 932: 881: 880: 825: 824: 769: 768: 597: 596: 540: 539: 483: 482: 130:HMS Cicero (F170) 126: 125: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3271: 3231: 3230: 3224: 3134: 3107: 3041: 3034: 2951: 2944: 2796: 2789: 2505: 2500: 2444:HMS Jackal (F22) 2395: 2291: 2284: 2227:with 32 though! 2130: 2123: 2044:Vancouver (brig) 1947: 1940: 1891: 1884: 1845: 1838: 1794:February 9, 2009 1789: 1782: 1748:February 9, 2009 1743: 1736: 1702:February 9, 2009 1697: 1690: 1656:February 9, 2009 1651: 1644: 1610:February 9, 2009 1605: 1598: 1564:February 9, 2009 1559: 1552: 1454:Sir Thomas Allin 1424:January 28, 2009 1419: 1412: 1340:January 28, 2009 1335: 1328: 1312: 1306: 1270: 1264: 1120:January 21, 2009 1115: 1108: 1061: 1013:January 20, 2009 1008: 1001: 985: 969: 940: 924: 914:appropriate page 857:January 19, 2009 852: 845: 801:January 19, 2009 796: 789: 745:January 19, 2009 740: 733: 699: 661: 573:January 16, 2009 568: 561: 528:SS Empire Arthur 516:January 16, 2009 511: 504: 459:January 16, 2009 454: 447: 97: 90: 33: 32: 26: 3279: 3278: 3274: 3273: 3272: 3270: 3269: 3268: 3254: 3253: 3228: 3170: 3151: 3130: 3129:Cool, thanks! - 3103: 3092: 3089:John Phillimore 3058:John Phillimore 3032: 3001: 2942: 2902: 2844: 2787: 2751: 2694: 2633: 2631:HMS Juno (1790) 2534: 2503: 2498: 2489: 2434: 2393: 2349:HM Armed Smack 2341: 2336:HM Armed Smack 2282: 2178: 2121: 2105:David Underdown 2090:David Underdown 2086: 2032: 1994: 1938: 1882: 1836: 1780: 1734: 1688: 1642: 1596: 1550: 1460:Royal Sovereign 1456: 1410: 1374: 1326: 1313: 1310: 1304: 1271: 1268: 1262: 1257: 1187: 1164: 1106: 1055: 999: 986: 983: 941: 938: 899: 843: 787: 731: 693: 655: 616: 559: 502: 445: 302: 243: 219:HMS Galtee More 185:. Anvil became 183:24 class sloops 155:Cape St Vincent 141:Cape St Vincent 139:was launced as 133: 102:5 January, 2009 88: 65: 30: 22: 21: 20: 18:User talk:Benea 12: 11: 5: 3277: 3275: 3267: 3266: 3256: 3255: 3250: 3249: 3232: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3173: 3169: 3166: 3150: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3096:disambiguating 3091: 3085: 3068: 3067: 3046:March 25, 2009 3042: 3031: 3028: 3000: 2997: 2995: 2978: 2977: 2956:March 21, 2009 2952: 2941: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2901: 2900:John Philimore 2898: 2875: 2874: 2843: 2840: 2823: 2822: 2801:March 19, 2009 2797: 2786: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2750: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2726: 2725: 2693: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2632: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2591: 2590: 2538: 2533: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2488: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2437: 2433: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2340: 2334: 2318: 2317: 2292: 2281: 2278: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2181: 2177: 2174: 2157: 2156: 2147:William Prowse 2131: 2120: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2085: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2031: 2026: 2025: 2024: 1993: 1990: 1974: 1973: 1948: 1937: 1934: 1918: 1917: 1892: 1881: 1878: 1872: 1871: 1846: 1835: 1832: 1816: 1815: 1790: 1779: 1776: 1770: 1769: 1744: 1733: 1730: 1724: 1723: 1698: 1687: 1684: 1678: 1677: 1652: 1641: 1638: 1632: 1631: 1606: 1595: 1592: 1586: 1585: 1560: 1549: 1546: 1499: 1498: 1455: 1452: 1446: 1445: 1420: 1409: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1373: 1368: 1362: 1361: 1336: 1325: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1309: 1297: 1296: 1277: 1276: 1267: 1256: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1190: 1186: 1183: 1163: 1158: 1142: 1141: 1116: 1105: 1102: 1088: 1054: 1051: 1035: 1034: 1009: 998: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 982: 937: 898: 895: 879: 878: 853: 842: 839: 823: 822: 797: 786: 783: 767: 766: 741: 730: 727: 692: 689: 654: 651: 615: 612: 595: 594: 569: 558: 555: 538: 537: 512: 501: 498: 481: 480: 455: 444: 441: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 417: 388: 355:Donald Bradman 301: 298: 297: 296: 295: 294: 242: 239: 238: 237: 221:and Spearhead 149:, which was a 132: 127: 124: 123: 98: 87: 84: 64: 61: 56: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3276: 3265: 3262: 3261: 3259: 3247: 3243: 3239: 3238: 3233: 3226: 3225: 3218: 3214: 3210: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3185: 3181: 3177: 3167: 3165: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3149: 3148: 3143: 3137: 3133: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3122: 3118: 3113: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3106: 3101: 3097: 3090: 3086: 3084: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3065: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3053: 3052: 3051:Did you know? 3047: 3043: 3040: 3036: 3035: 3029: 3027: 3026: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3006: 2998: 2996: 2993: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2975: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2963: 2962: 2961:Did you know? 2957: 2953: 2950: 2946: 2945: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2912: 2908: 2899: 2897: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2873: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2841: 2839: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2820: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2808: 2807: 2806:Did you know? 2802: 2798: 2795: 2791: 2790: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2748: 2742: 2738: 2734: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2724: 2720: 2716: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2691: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2655: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2630: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2582: 2578: 2573: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2551: 2550: 2546: 2542: 2532: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2507: 2506: 2501: 2494: 2486: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2466: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2445: 2441: 2431: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2352: 2346: 2339: 2335: 2333: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2315: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2303: 2302: 2301:Did you know? 2297: 2296:March 7, 2009 2293: 2290: 2286: 2285: 2279: 2277: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2175: 2173: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2154: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2142: 2141: 2140:Did you know? 2136: 2132: 2129: 2125: 2124: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2050: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2030: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1991: 1989: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1971: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1959: 1958: 1957:Did you know? 1953: 1949: 1946: 1942: 1941: 1935: 1933: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1915: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1903: 1902: 1901:Did you know? 1897: 1893: 1890: 1886: 1885: 1879: 1877: 1869: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1857: 1856: 1855:Did you know? 1851: 1847: 1844: 1840: 1839: 1833: 1831: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1813: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1801: 1800: 1799:Did you know? 1795: 1791: 1788: 1784: 1783: 1777: 1775: 1767: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1755: 1754: 1753:Did you know? 1749: 1745: 1742: 1738: 1737: 1731: 1729: 1721: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714:Sydney Dacres 1709: 1708: 1707:Did you know? 1703: 1699: 1696: 1692: 1691: 1685: 1683: 1675: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1663: 1662: 1661:Did you know? 1657: 1653: 1650: 1646: 1645: 1639: 1637: 1629: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1617: 1616: 1615:Did you know? 1611: 1607: 1604: 1600: 1599: 1593: 1591: 1583: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1571: 1570: 1569:Did you know? 1565: 1561: 1558: 1554: 1553: 1547: 1545: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1461: 1453: 1451: 1443: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1431: 1430: 1429:Did you know? 1425: 1421: 1418: 1414: 1413: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1372: 1369: 1367: 1359: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1347: 1346: 1345:Did you know? 1341: 1337: 1334: 1330: 1329: 1323: 1317: 1314: 1307: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1278: 1275: 1272: 1265: 1259: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1221: 1216: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1184: 1182: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1162: 1159: 1157: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1139: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132:Richard Bligh 1127: 1126: 1125:Did you know? 1121: 1117: 1114: 1110: 1109: 1103: 1101: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1074: 1069: 1065: 1060: 1052: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1032: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1020: 1019: 1018:Did you know? 1014: 1010: 1007: 1003: 1002: 996: 990: 987: 979: 975: 972: 968: 963: 962: 961: 957: 953: 948: 947: 946: 945: 942: 934: 930: 927: 923: 919: 915: 911: 907: 902: 896: 894: 893: 889: 885: 876: 872: 871: 870: 864: 863: 862:Did you know? 858: 854: 851: 847: 846: 840: 838: 837: 833: 829: 820: 816: 815: 814: 808: 807: 806:Did you know? 802: 798: 795: 791: 790: 784: 782: 781: 777: 773: 764: 760: 759: 758: 752: 751: 750:Did you know? 746: 742: 739: 735: 734: 728: 726: 725: 721: 717: 713: 712: 707: 703: 702:Richard Bligh 698: 690: 688: 687: 683: 679: 675: 674: 669: 665: 660: 652: 650: 649: 645: 641: 637: 631: 629: 625: 621: 613: 611: 610: 606: 602: 592: 588: 587: 586: 580: 579: 578:Did you know? 574: 570: 567: 563: 562: 556: 554: 553: 549: 545: 535: 531: 530: 529: 523: 522: 521:Did you know? 517: 513: 510: 506: 505: 499: 497: 496: 492: 488: 478: 474: 473: 472: 466: 465: 464:Did you know? 460: 456: 453: 449: 448: 442: 430: 426: 422: 418: 416: 412: 408: 403: 402: 401: 397: 393: 389: 387: 383: 379: 375: 370: 369: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 351: 350: 346: 342: 337: 336: 335: 331: 327: 323: 318: 317: 316: 315: 311: 307: 299: 293: 289: 285: 281: 280: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 262: 261: 260: 256: 252: 248: 240: 236: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 203:HMS Sansovino 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 171: 170: 169: 168: 164: 160: 156: 152: 148: 147: 142: 138: 131: 128: 121: 117: 116: 115: 109: 108: 107:Did you know? 103: 99: 96: 92: 91: 85: 83: 82: 78: 74: 70: 62: 60: 59: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3241: 3235: 3171: 3152: 3147:Atheltemplar 3146: 3093: 3071: 3056: 3055: 3049: 3008: 3002: 2994: 2981: 2966: 2965: 2959: 2922:Henry Paulet 2903: 2887:Rif Winfield 2882: 2881:rather than 2876: 2845: 2826: 2813:Henry Paulet 2811: 2810: 2804: 2752: 2695: 2634: 2594: 2552: 2535: 2496: 2490: 2464: 2435: 2374: 2355: 2350: 2342: 2337: 2321: 2306: 2305: 2299: 2267:Rif Winfield 2263: 2179: 2160: 2145: 2144: 2138: 2087: 2047: 2035: 2033: 1995: 1977: 1962: 1961: 1955: 1921: 1906: 1905: 1899: 1875: 1860: 1859: 1853: 1819: 1804: 1803: 1797: 1773: 1758: 1757: 1751: 1727: 1712: 1711: 1705: 1681: 1666: 1665: 1659: 1635: 1620: 1619: 1613: 1589: 1574: 1573: 1567: 1535:Rif Winfield 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1500: 1469:Rif Winfield 1464: 1459: 1457: 1449: 1434: 1433: 1427: 1379:Brianyoumans 1375: 1365: 1350: 1349: 1343: 1219: 1192: 1188: 1167: 1165: 1145: 1130: 1129: 1123: 1071: 1056: 1038: 1023: 1022: 1016: 903: 900: 882: 867: 866: 860: 826: 811: 810: 804: 770: 755: 754: 748: 709: 694: 671: 656: 632: 617: 598: 583: 582: 576: 541: 526: 525: 519: 484: 469: 468: 462: 303: 244: 215:HMS Sir Hugo 199:HMS Sainfoin 193:, Battleaxe 187:HMS Rocksand 154: 151:Type C1 ship 145: 140: 136: 134: 112: 111: 105: 66: 55: 43: 37: 3234:This is an 3178:? Thanks - 3176:HMS Blossom 2883:Lowescroffe 2829:Victuallers 2537:Class page. 2225:HMS Swallow 2184:HMS Fortune 2049:Golden Hind 1527:Royal James 1519:Royal James 1282:HMS Waveney 897:Acasta page 266:WP:ROLLBACK 223:HMS Ormonde 205:, Gauntlet 197:, Crossbow 195:HMS Donovan 189:, Arquebus 69:HMS Goshawk 36:This is an 3172:Dear Benea 3132:Lilac Soul 3105:Lilac Soul 3005:HMS Imogen 2999:HMS Imogen 2864:Acad Ronin 2849:Acad Ronin 2755:Acad Ronin 2733:Acad Ronin 2699:Acad Ronin 2676:Acad Ronin 2638:Acad Ronin 2554:an aside. 2485:SS Letitia 2440:HMS Jackal 2436:Dear Benea 2180:Dear Benea 1923:Shubinator 1189:Dear Benea 211:HMS Silvio 209:, Halberd 207:HMS Sefton 201:, Cutlass 191:HMS Cicero 175:Broadsword 146:Cape Argos 2983:Gatoclass 2658:WP:ENGVAR 2654:WP:MOSDAB 2470:Bellhalla 2468:, too? — 2465:Iphigenia 2414:Bellhalla 2379:Bellhalla 2375:Inverlyon 2360:Bellhalla 2351:Inverlyon 2345:talk page 2338:Inverlyon 2323:Gatoclass 1979:Gatoclass 1515:Old James 1507:St Andrew 1503:St Andrew 1091:Jappalang 1078:Jappalang 716:Jappalang 678:Jappalang 241:Rollback? 3258:Category 3074:Dravecky 2907:Skinny87 2163:Dravecky 2054:Skookum1 1523:Monmouth 1511:Plymouth 1255:HMS Test 1147:Dravecky 1040:Dravecky 884:Dravecky 828:Dravecky 772:Dravecky 601:Dravecky 544:Dravecky 487:Dravecky 247:rollback 213:, Lance 3237:archive 3155:Mjroots 3009:Imogene 1202:Waveney 1194:Derwent 1066:at the 984:complex 939:complex 918:MOS:DAB 906:changes 704:at the 666:at the 217:, Mace 179:Javelin 159:Mjroots 39:archive 3017:Toddy1 2749:Valeur 2599:Xyl 54 2595:aren't 2556:Xyl 54 2541:Xyl 54 2036:navies 1999:Wallie 1305:Paste 1263:Paste 908:- per 640:Petree 300:Nelson 153:. Was 137:Cicero 3209:Benea 3117:Benea 2926:Benea 2771:Benea 2715:Benea 2697:sail. 2662:Benea 2613:Benea 2577:Benea 2516:Benea 2504:broil 2499:Royal 2400:Benea 2229:Benea 2084:Email 2070:Benea 2014:Benea 1821:Benea 1488:Benea 1394:Benea 1286:Benea 1241:Benea 1214:Stour 1172:Tom B 1168:start 952:Benea 421:Tom B 407:Benea 392:Tom B 378:Tom B 359:Benea 341:Tom B 326:Benea 306:Tom B 284:Benea 270:Woody 251:Woody 227:Benea 16:< 3213:talk 3199:talk 3195:Shem 3184:talk 3180:Shem 3159:talk 3121:talk 3078:talk 3021:talk 2987:talk 2930:talk 2911:talk 2891:talk 2868:talk 2853:talk 2833:talk 2775:talk 2759:talk 2737:talk 2719:talk 2703:talk 2680:talk 2666:talk 2642:talk 2617:talk 2603:talk 2581:talk 2560:talk 2545:talk 2520:talk 2474:talk 2463:HMS 2452:talk 2448:Shem 2418:talk 2404:talk 2383:talk 2364:talk 2356:only 2327:talk 2271:talk 2251:talk 2247:Shem 2233:talk 2215:talk 2211:Shem 2200:talk 2196:Shem 2167:talk 2109:talk 2094:talk 2074:talk 2058:talk 2018:talk 2003:talk 1983:talk 1927:talk 1825:talk 1539:talk 1492:talk 1473:talk 1398:talk 1383:talk 1290:talk 1245:talk 1229:talk 1225:Shem 1220:Test 1217:and 1210:Kale 1206:Doon 1198:Eden 1176:talk 1151:talk 1095:talk 1082:talk 1044:talk 956:talk 901:Hi, 888:talk 832:talk 776:talk 720:talk 682:talk 644:talk 605:talk 548:talk 491:talk 425:talk 411:talk 396:talk 382:talk 363:talk 345:talk 330:talk 310:talk 288:talk 274:talk 255:talk 231:talk 163:talk 135:HMS 77:talk 73:Shem 3145:MV 3044:On 2954:On 2799:On 2487:DYK 2347:of 2294:On 2133:On 1950:On 1894:On 1848:On 1792:On 1746:On 1700:On 1654:On 1608:On 1562:On 1422:On 1338:On 1118:On 1011:On 974:(c) 971:(t) 967:WLU 929:(c) 926:(t) 922:WLU 855:On 799:On 743:On 571:On 514:On 457:On 100:On 3260:: 3215:) 3201:) 3186:) 3161:) 3123:) 3080:) 3072:-- 3066:. 3048:, 3023:) 2989:) 2976:. 2958:, 2932:) 2913:) 2893:) 2870:) 2855:) 2835:) 2821:. 2803:, 2777:) 2761:) 2739:) 2721:) 2705:) 2682:) 2668:) 2644:) 2619:) 2605:) 2583:) 2562:) 2547:) 2522:) 2476:) 2454:) 2420:) 2406:) 2385:) 2366:) 2329:) 2316:. 2298:, 2273:) 2253:) 2235:) 2217:) 2202:) 2169:) 2161:-- 2155:. 2137:, 2111:) 2096:) 2076:) 2060:) 2020:) 2005:) 1985:) 1972:. 1954:, 1929:) 1916:. 1898:, 1870:. 1852:, 1827:) 1814:. 1796:, 1768:. 1750:, 1722:. 1704:, 1676:. 1658:, 1630:. 1612:, 1584:. 1566:, 1541:) 1494:) 1475:) 1444:. 1426:, 1400:) 1385:) 1360:. 1342:, 1292:) 1247:) 1231:) 1212:, 1208:, 1204:, 1200:, 1196:, 1178:) 1153:) 1140:. 1122:, 1097:) 1084:) 1046:) 1033:. 1015:, 958:) 890:) 877:. 859:, 834:) 821:. 803:, 778:) 765:. 747:, 722:) 684:) 646:) 607:) 599:-- 593:. 575:, 550:) 542:-- 536:. 518:, 493:) 485:-- 479:. 461:, 427:) 413:) 398:) 384:) 365:) 347:) 332:) 312:) 290:) 276:) 257:) 233:) 165:) 122:. 104:, 79:) 3248:. 3211:( 3197:( 3182:( 3157:( 3119:( 3076:( 3019:( 2985:( 2928:( 2909:( 2889:( 2866:( 2851:( 2831:( 2773:( 2757:( 2735:( 2717:( 2701:( 2678:( 2664:( 2652:( 2640:( 2615:( 2601:( 2579:( 2558:( 2543:( 2518:( 2472:( 2450:( 2416:( 2402:( 2381:( 2362:( 2325:( 2269:( 2249:( 2231:( 2213:( 2198:( 2165:( 2107:( 2092:( 2072:( 2056:( 2042:( 2016:( 2001:( 1981:( 1925:( 1823:( 1537:( 1490:( 1471:( 1396:( 1381:( 1288:( 1243:( 1227:( 1174:( 1149:( 1093:( 1080:( 1042:( 980:/ 954:( 935:/ 886:( 830:( 774:( 718:( 680:( 642:( 603:( 546:( 489:( 423:( 409:( 394:( 380:( 361:( 343:( 328:( 308:( 286:( 272:( 253:( 229:( 161:( 75:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.