534:-- does get banned. Something is rotten in the state of Denmark, especially when no one cares about the accuser probably creating own sockpuppet account called IconicBigBen and created 24 January (and getting endless warnings about his wrongdoings). But, curiously enough, he never got a ban so he can keep on doing what he has been so successful at doing: bashing the person who spent weeks actually writing a contribution wider and deeper than most editors do in their first attempt after a year of research to collect all the necessary data. By the way, everything you read in the article about the role of your motherland in Bosnia is more than true -- I happen to have considerably more "sensitive information" on that particular topic than the article would indicate. You may dislike it and feel hurt about it, but that makes you as nationalist as either me or the Serbian accuser. Simply, that is the world we live in, and encyclopedias describe the world I would think. Pretending that there is no nationalism means taking sides (of globalism). I on the other hand do not take any sides. I could not care less what you or your Queen or the Serbs (or the Pope for that matter -- no one has noticed that the article accuses the Church of many things around Bosnia also) thought about my article, as long as it is fair and balanced. But to attack one (potentially) valuable contribution like my article, which is what this Serbian guy has done 10 minutes after it was up (he probably followed me writing it from the start, as he had a lengthy attack ready-made), is something I could not find justification in any regulation on the Knowledge (XXG). On the contrary, the nomination criteria for the Featured Article in fact do make an "almost 100%" (to cite a more famous editor) match with my article's characteristics. I could not believe my eyes when I saw it nominated -- that is when I realized that I had done a hell of a good job. I am very proud of it indeed. Now you can delete it if you like, and ban me indefinitely. The value remains, and people can read and they can think, as they have been reading and thinking, not only the article but the talk about it even more so. Cheers (coyly yours)
530:, becoming voluntary-only in most jurisdictions. I repeat: without knowing anything about the skill of your lie-detector "expert", I can say that your "CheckUser" is worthless. In response to your outcry for "cooperation": I can only say that spending weeks on writing what I thought would be a good article has been a pretty mighty contribution, by all reasonable measures. Of course, some value editing more, especially when they do not get a ban for engaging in edit wars while everyone else they report for engaging in edit wars with
183:
157:
However, unlike you, I am not abusing that right. "An independent contributor to open sources"? What else would I be? A CIA agent who is conspiring against you? "Self-proclaimed lord of all Bosnia pages"? If that's how you call someone who tries to keep Bosnia-related articles factually correct, so be it. Now I would appreciate if you stayed away from my talk page, when using either of your accounts. Further
430:
257:
626:
413:, checkuser Jpgordon has verified that Regionlegion is your sock. There is no need for you to be coy about the connection. Knowledge (XXG) does not exactly *need* new nationalist edit-warriors to fight over Balkan articles, so I am wondering whether your block should be extended to indefinite. So far we have seen no spirit of cooperation from you.
515:
That is not addressing my request at all, in fact it sounds like dodging it in all relevant parts. My request was about evenhandedness. If that can not be guaranteed on
Knowledge (XXG) then I was wasting quite a bit of my time; coy towards someone who dodges your request must be deserved too. Back to
156:
Snooping around and being nosy? Your subpage was in 4 categories (which is why I found it; the invented phrase "Bosnian Royal Family" attracted my attention) and it had to be removed in accordance with
Knowledge (XXG) policies. I have the right to edit any Knowledge (XXG) article, just like you have.
342:
It takes at least two to fight. I am not aware that the other party
Surtsicna has been blocked for the same reason (edit wars). If not, I think my account should be unblocked right away. We are in a fun business encompassing fair play, are we not? As for the claim of "Regionlegion" connection, feel
51:
Personally, in
Bohemia is Sigismund called "Red Fox" for his treachery, and is one of most disliked Bohemian kings. But, on other side, for Hungarians he is one of "best" kings. so, is better to avoid personal/national views in articles, without proper references, as this can end in edit war and
70:: User subpages that are draft versions of articles should be kept out of content categories. If you copy an article from mainspace to userspace and it already contains categories, remove them or comment them out. Restore the categories when you move the draft back into article space. --
546:
I actually took the time to read this. I see absolutely nothing here that would make anyone wish to unblock you. Unfoundedly questioning the competence of a longstanding editor is definitely not the way to go about this.
36:
Common knowledge - you are in
English wikipedia and average American/Briton probably don't know anything about King Sigismund, and of course, he know nothing about medieval battle in Bosnia. Take care about
33:"Articles and posts on Knowledge (XXG), or on websites that mirror its content, should not be used as sources, as this would amount to Knowledge (XXG) citing itself, a self-reference."
603:
You invited this SDB agent on my talk page "coincidentally" when you were responding! Hilarious! MI6/SDB coalition is way too funny lately. Trying to provoke me? Dream on.
661:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following
700:
580:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
388:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
117:
You are right about self-censorship. We create encyclopaedia and many wikipedians (as you and me) are from many countries, so is necessary to be neutral.--
705:
to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
470:
297:
588:
Since
Bosnipedian's unblock request offers us so little hope for any future improvement in his attitude, I've extended his block to indefinite.
669:
565:
373:
114:, because you added categories to personal subpage and this is not allowed. Simply, Knowledge (XXG) is not a blog or webspace provider.
633:
465:
292:
650:
207:
696:
223:
692:
524:. On the admin talk page, the person you refer to as CheckUser expert, uses term "almost 100%". That reminds a lot of the
443:
270:
190:
158:
40:
References are not for me, but for every reader, so, my attempt for correct references is for help, nothing personally.
437:
264:
442:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
269:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
484:
311:
637:
137:
Hello, Bosnipedian/Regionlegion! Rest assured that I have no interest in your subpages. Just be aware that
96:
I can add
Sarajevo. And now I can add cross references from Sarajevo to Mars and from Mars to Sarajevo...
359:
138:
30:
593:
553:
522:
CheckUser (...) can require considerable skill and experience to investigate cases even with the tool
418:
246:
203:
111:
104:
67:
710:
166:
146:
100:
22:
677:
636:. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Knowledge (XXG) takes
238:
99:
Bracketing or "Wikilinks" are for better understanding of article, so you can simply write in
44:
604:
574:
448:
395:
382:
355:
275:
517:
234:
211:
655:
589:
548:
414:
242:
182:
122:
75:
57:
219:
215:
199:
706:
162:
142:
673:
527:
110:
About your subpage - this is allowed only in case, if these are against rules, as
139:
using subpages for permanent content that is meant to be part of the encyclopedia
88:
About self-referencing - because anyone can change every article. For example in
625:
118:
71:
53:
343:
free to establish it in the manner in which claims are normally established.
621:
File copyright problem with File:CoatoOfArms_BoricevicBerislavic_noframe.jpg
714:
681:
612:
597:
555:
422:
403:
363:
250:
170:
150:
126:
79:
61:
89:
237:. Edit warring, personal attacks and abuse of multiple accounts (per
640:
very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the
235:
WP:AN3#User:Bosnipedian reported by User:Surtsicna (Result: 1 week)
107:, and in Dobor Massacre you can add more materials, references etc.
21:
Dear
Bosnopedian,I must say some notes about your edits in article
93:
668:
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the
648:
of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a
624:
428:
255:
181:
562:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
370:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
214:. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek
687:
File:Boricevic dynasts Bosnia sm.jpg listed for deletion
582:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
390:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
662:
498:
494:
488:
479:
475:
461:
457:
453:
410:
325:
321:
315:
306:
302:
288:
284:
280:
691:
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,
218:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
436:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
263:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
222:. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may
634:File:CoatoOfArms_BoricevicBerislavic_noframe.jpg
92:I can change, that is on Mars, and in article
8:
206:. During a dispute, you should first try to
672:. Thanks again for your cooperation.
7:
693:File:Boricevic dynasts Bosnia sm.jpg
161:will be deleted from my talk page.
233:The full report of this case is at
697:Knowledge (XXG):Files for deletion
14:
84:Reply to message in my talkpage:
526:lie detectors". We all know how
202:caused by your engagement in an
670:media copyright questions page
1:
226:by adding the text {{unblock|
208:discuss controversial changes
194:from editing for a period of
103:, that was established after
715:08:15, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
682:05:40, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
613:18:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
598:17:45, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
556:17:13, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
423:15:13, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
404:14:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
364:15:14, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
251:04:53, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
171:16:32, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
151:15:30, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
127:17:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
80:15:46, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
62:15:38, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
440:, who declined the request.
267:, who declined the request.
730:
566:guide to appealing blocks
374:guide to appealing blocks
141:is not allowed. Regards,
632:Thank you for uploading
608:
516:the issue: according to
399:
656:image description page
629:
433:
260:
186:
133:"Bosnian Royal Family"
695:, has been listed at
628:
485:change block settings
432:
354:Per comment below. —
312:change block settings
259:
185:
198:to prevent further
101:Order of the Dragon
23:Order of the Dragon
17:Order of the Dragon
630:
434:
261:
216:dispute resolution
187:
699:. Please see the
239:User:Regionlegion
224:contest the block
721:
579:
573:
504:
502:
491:
473:
471:deleted contribs
431:
387:
381:
331:
329:
318:
300:
298:deleted contribs
258:
228:your reason here
159:personal attacks
729:
728:
724:
723:
722:
720:
719:
718:
689:
623:
585:
577:
571:
570:, then use the
559:
537:
492:
482:
468:
451:
444:blocking policy
429:
393:
385:
379:
378:, then use the
367:
345:
319:
309:
295:
278:
271:blocking policy
256:
231:
220:page protection
179:
135:
19:
12:
11:
5:
727:
725:
688:
685:
622:
619:
617:
601:
600:
560:
544:
540:Decline reason
513:
509:Request reason
506:
427:
426:
425:
368:
352:
348:Decline reason
340:
336:Request reason
333:
254:
188:You have been
180:
178:
175:
174:
173:
134:
131:
130:
129:
115:
108:
105:Dobor Massacre
97:
49:
48:
41:
38:
34:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
726:
717:
716:
712:
708:
704:
703:
698:
694:
686:
684:
683:
679:
675:
671:
666:
664:
659:
657:
653:
652:
651:copyright tag
647:
643:
639:
635:
627:
620:
618:
615:
614:
610:
606:
599:
595:
591:
587:
586:
584:
583:
576:
569:
567:
558:
557:
554:
552:
551:
543:
541:
536:
535:
531:
529:
523:
519:
512:
510:
505:
500:
496:
490:
486:
481:
477:
472:
467:
463:
462:global blocks
459:
458:active blocks
455:
450:
445:
441:
439:
438:administrator
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
407:
406:
405:
401:
397:
392:
391:
384:
377:
375:
366:
365:
361:
357:
351:
349:
344:
339:
337:
332:
327:
323:
317:
313:
308:
304:
299:
294:
290:
289:global blocks
286:
285:active blocks
282:
277:
272:
268:
266:
265:administrator
253:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
192:
184:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
155:
154:
153:
152:
148:
144:
140:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
113:
109:
106:
102:
98:
95:
91:
87:
86:
85:
82:
81:
77:
73:
69:
64:
63:
59:
55:
46:
42:
39:
35:
32:
29:According to
28:
27:
26:
24:
16:
701:
690:
667:
660:
649:
645:
641:
631:
616:
602:
581:
563:
561:
549:
545:
539:
538:
533:
525:
521:
514:
508:
507:
480:creation log
447:
435:
409:As reported
394:
389:
371:
369:
353:
347:
346:
341:
335:
334:
307:creation log
274:
262:
232:
227:
195:
189:
177:January 2010
136:
83:
65:
50:
20:
605:Bosnipedian
449:Bosnipedian
396:Bosnipedian
356:Daniel Case
276:Bosnipedian
31:WP:CIRCULAR
702:discussion
590:EdJohnston
550:Smashville
528:that ended
476:filter log
415:EdJohnston
303:filter log
243:EdJohnston
230:}} below.
200:disruption
112:WP:BADCATS
68:WP:BADCATS
707:DrKiernan
663:this link
638:copyright
564:read the
495:checkuser
454:block log
372:read the
322:checkuser
281:block log
212:consensus
210:and seek
163:Surtsicna
143:Surtsicna
52:blocks.--
674:Rockfang
644:and the
466:contribs
293:contribs
204:edit war
90:Sarajevo
654:to the
642:license
575:unblock
489:unblock
383:unblock
316:unblock
191:blocked
45:WP:NPOV
646:source
518:WP:CHK
196:1 week
568:first
376:first
119:Yopie
72:Yopie
66:P.S.
54:Yopie
43:Read
711:talk
678:talk
609:talk
594:talk
532:them
419:talk
411:here
400:talk
360:talk
247:talk
167:talk
147:talk
123:talk
94:Mars
76:talk
58:talk
499:log
446:).
326:log
273:).
241:).
37:it.
713:)
680:)
665:.
658:.
611:)
596:)
578:}}
572:{{
542::
520::
511::
493:•
487:•
483:•
478:•
474:•
469:•
464:•
460:•
456:•
421:)
402:)
386:}}
380:{{
362:)
350::
338::
320:•
314:•
310:•
305:•
301:•
296:•
291:•
287:•
283:•
249:)
169:)
149:)
125:)
78:)
60:)
25::
709:(
676:(
607:(
592:(
503:)
501:)
497:(
452:(
417:(
398:(
358:(
330:)
328:)
324:(
279:(
245:(
165:(
145:(
121:(
74:(
56:(
47:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
