28:
and happened to come across your comment. I'm going to leave the closure of that one to someone with a bit more experience in it, and really I have no opinion about the deletion at all. However, I thought it might be worthwhile to mention to you that not a lot of
Wikipedians think that everything
32:
Also, when looking at an AfD debate, there are only a few cases when the user's identity should influence how their point is viewed, such as if the user has a conflict of interest, is a sockpuppet or a single-purpose account, whether they are an authority on the subject at hand, or the like.
29:
ought to be included, nor do many think that everything ought to be deleted, obviously. So, if someone states they are an inclusionist, it doesn't necessarily mean they think all articles whose subjects verily (or even purportedly) exist ought to be kept.
43:
and I'll get back to you. Thanks, and have a great time contributing! Discussion is a very core principle to
Knowledge (XXG) and is what holds it together; I'm glad you have an interest in participating.
25:
36:
One last thing: if you have a question or comment for a user, or want to thank them profusely, it's usually best to use their talkpage. This keeps the other discussion on topic.
33:
Otherwise, there is a danger of argumentum ad hominem (a logical fallacy, arguing about the person making the point instead of the point).
49:
40:
45:
18:
53:
39:
If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message
8:
7:
14:
26:AfD debate on East Coast Avengers
1:
54:03:14, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
69:
46:--Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran
24:Hail. I was reading the
19:East Coast Avengers
60:
68:
67:
63:
62:
61:
59:
58:
57:
22:
12:
11:
5:
66:
64:
41:on my talkpage
21:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
65:
56:
55:
51:
47:
42:
37:
34:
30:
27:
20:
16:
38:
35:
31:
23:
17:AfD for
50:talk
52:)
48:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.