276:. If you don't object, I will do this in a few days' time (the content will be adjusted). The article on Optical can always be recreated if you can find sufficient sources about musician alone (and not as part of the duo). However, if you object, you can remove the deletion tag, and try to add sources about the musician independent of the duo (simple listing sites will not be enough). If sources are insufficient to establish notability for the musician, then the article will be proposed for deletion in an AfD discussion. This AfD will be determined by the community to see if the article should be kept or deleted.
350:
61:
117:
321:. I would therefore recommend adding at least another source (as already indicated, Discogs and other listing sites do not qualify for notability purposes, and AllMusic only counts when it has a professional review), otherwise there is always the risk that someone else may nominate it for deletion.
298:
I have edited the article to, among other things, add a reference to an article that is specifically about
Optical as a separate artist that mentions his other collaborations, solo work, and remixes, and that additionally enforces the claim about the notability of the "To Shape The Future" release.
446:- The editor that added proposal didn't demonstrate enough technical background in subject matter of software development or information technology to be able to knowledgeably assert either notability or lack of.
411:
69:
249:
I'd suggest that you move the article to Ed Rush and
Optical and rewrite it as being about the duo, otherwise it is likely to be deleted.
441:
I have added multiple additional resources from notable online publications. I further object proposed deletion on the following grounds:
86:
469:
in good faith which is evident by lacking the minimum legwork required to find the myriad relevant resources on subject matter online.
415:
139:
104:
135:
77:
403:
361:
339:
183:
407:
73:
197:, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
223:
92:
273:
272:
article are not sufficient to justify an article on the individual, but can justify an article on the duo
419:
454:
318:
173:
80:
tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
65:
53:
466:
431:
269:
194:
187:
82:
386:
300:
193:
Hello, Bmarkovic.79. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started,
38:
427:
123:
108:
17:
450:
373:
28:
134:. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can
169:
158:
64:
Hello, and welcome to
Knowledge (XXG). I noticed that you made a change to an article,
372:
While all constructive contributions to
Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be
326:
281:
254:
240:
230:
390:
131:
76:
and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
423:
313:
It is a good source and I'm happy with it for now, but note the requirement for
24:
435:
330:
308:
285:
258:
244:
177:
97:
46:
32:
396:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
322:
293:
277:
250:
236:
138:
without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
60:
458:
357:
343:
130:
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
455:
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&q=nuxt
116:
157:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
23:
Blanking an article isn't welcome here. The page should be deleted.
126:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
222:
you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on
348:
115:
146:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
226:. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
414:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
201:
159:
149:
379:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
72:. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to
167:Thank you for helping improve Knowledge (XXG)!
8:
385:notice, but please explain why in your
206:remove the text that looks like this:
7:
459:https://www.google.com/search?q=nuxt
317:nontrivial independent coverage per
374:deleted for any of several reasons
364:because of the following concern:
14:
449:- The article subject passes the
59:
37:I'm still editing the article --
209:{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
1:
368:No indication of notability.
98:21:06, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
418:allows discussion to reach
399:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
382:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
268:I think the sources in the
68:, but you didn't provide a
484:
465:The editor didn't observe
410:exist. In particular, the
178:07:14, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
47:10:05, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
33:10:04, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
404:proposed deletion process
331:12:46, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
309:06:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
286:13:48, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
259:10:11, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
245:10:09, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
78:referencing for beginners
436:16:52, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
304:
229:You can leave a note on
160:leaving us some feedback
136:create articles yourself
42:
391:the article's talk page
233:if you have questions.
224:the article's talk page
467:Knowledge (XXG):NEXIST
370:
353:
220:be sure to explain why
120:
416:articles for deletion
366:
362:proposed for deletion
352:
274:Ed Rush & Optical
140:Articles for Creation
119:
105:Articles for creation
451:Knowledge (XXG):SET
103:Your submission at
66:Sunglasses at Night
54:Sunglasses at Night
408:deletion processes
354:
270:Optical (musician)
195:Optical (musician)
188:Optical (musician)
121:
74:include a citation
340:Proposed deletion
184:Proposed deletion
111:has been accepted
85:
475:
401:
400:
384:
383:
351:
297:
211:
210:
162:
152:
124:Optical (artist)
109:Optical (artist)
95:
89:
81:
63:
52:Recent edits to
18:Judiciary Police
483:
482:
478:
477:
476:
474:
473:
472:
412:speedy deletion
398:
397:
381:
380:
349:
347:
291:
266:
208:
207:
191:
180:
148:
142:if you prefer.
132:Knowledge (XXG)
113:
93:
87:
70:reliable source
57:
21:
12:
11:
5:
481:
479:
471:
470:
463:
461:
447:
444:
442:
422:for deletion.
402:will stop the
346:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
265:
262:
216:
215:
212:
204:
190:
181:
165:
164:
155:
128:
114:
112:
101:
56:
50:
20:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
480:
468:
464:
462:
460:
456:
452:
448:
445:
443:
440:
439:
438:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
394:
392:
388:
377:
375:
369:
365:
363:
359:
345:
341:
338:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
311:
310:
306:
302:
295:
290:
289:
288:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
264:Proposed move
263:
261:
260:
256:
252:
247:
246:
242:
238:
234:
232:
227:
225:
221:
214:save the page
213:
205:
203:
202:edit the page
200:
199:
198:
196:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
168:
161:
156:
153:
151:
145:
144:
143:
141:
137:
133:
127:
125:
118:
110:
106:
102:
100:
99:
96:
90:
84:
79:
75:
71:
67:
62:
55:
51:
49:
48:
44:
40:
35:
34:
30:
26:
19:
16:
406:, but other
395:
387:edit summary
378:
371:
367:
356:The article
355:
314:
301:Bmarkovic.79
267:
248:
235:
231:my talk page
228:
219:
217:
192:
166:
147:
129:
122:
58:
39:Bmarkovic.79
36:
22:
319:WP:MUSICBIO
94:talk to me!
420:consensus
360:has been
170:Legacypac
150:help desk
315:multiple
88:contribs
453:: see:
358:Nuxt.js
344:Nuxt.js
432:Spjall
389:or on
218:Also,
424:Frayæ
83:FoCuS
25:Xx236
428:Talk
327:talk
305:talk
282:talk
255:talk
241:talk
174:talk
43:talk
29:talk
457:or
342:of
323:Hzh
294:Hzh
278:Hzh
251:Hzh
237:Hzh
186:of
434:)
393:.
376:.
329:)
307:)
299:--
284:)
257:)
243:)
176:)
107::
91:;
45:)
31:)
430:/
426:(
325:(
303:(
296::
292:@
280:(
253:(
239:(
172:(
163:.
154:.
41:(
27:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
