213:
rating is more about the relative importance of a given article to that specific project. Those individual importance ratings can be and often are extremely varied among projects. Their primary function is, effectively, to just serve as an indication to the members of that specific project which articles are in effect considered more "central" to the topic. Russell, as the founder of the group from which the JWs derived, is in a sense as important to those groups as
739:
696:
388:
621:
339:
286:
432:
I know why. You are stalking down articles which do not fall inline with your
Jehovah’s Witnesses Charles Russell point of view. You have been doing it for some time. You are not going to delete this or manipulate this page. I am contacted the alumni and university for assistance with this article in
250:
JWs did not exist in
Russell's time, so he didn't found that specific group, though he co-founded (and later, led) the Bible Student movement that formed its foundation. I've seen nothing ironclad about who specifically financed the Watch Tower Society, though I have seen credible suggestion that it
212:
You should know that there are two different types of assessment - quality and importance. Quality refers to the relative objective quality of an article (length, number of sources and source citations, variety of sources, etc.), and those ratings are fairly standard across wikipedia. The importance
168:
Russell was a participant of the memorial at the
Conleys. In nothing you reference does it directly say or even imply this was nothing more than a Conley event attended by Russell. It Really amazes me how everythign ends up glorifying Russell - no matter how rediculous or far fetched. This seems to
476:
Given that the one-line article says absolutely nothing at all about JWs, Russell, or much of anything else, it's difficult to imagine how you think deleting it might be because of some imagined "point of view". In any case, I only raised the discussion for its deletion and ultimately won't be the
449:
Incorrect. I was of course aware of the article when you created it because you first discussed it at the Conley article. A request for expansion was placed at the article almost immediately, and the article has not since improved. You were advised by another editor at the creation of the article
217:
is to
Christianity or Mohammed is to Islam. He did, after all, do a good deal to define the theological stances of the various groups, and provide a good deal of the start-up money. To the JWs themselves, or any group with an attached denomination, the single leaders of the groups tend to all get
144:
Memorial was held at the Conley's residence. (Specifically, Russell wrote, "We met on the night of March 24th, as usual, at the house of
Brother and Sister Conley (it being the most commodious);") Your belief that the passover events at the Conley's are not related to CTR is simply
221:
And the single rating of a given project only relates to that project's topic itself. Various
Catholic saints get remarkably different importance ratings for Theology, Saints, the denomination or denominations which include them in their liturgical calendars, and the like.
642:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
360:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
307:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
556:
The decision of the AfD was 'keep'. This is an opportunity to provide additional information and sources about Peters. If the article remains in its current form for an extended time, it may eventually again be submitted for deletion in the
710:
188:
says the adherents of that journal's audience met at the Conley's home for their
Memorial celebration. That audience was the Allegheny Bible students. If you have sources that provide additional or contrary information, please present
760:
402:
236:
Russell was not the founder of the Jehova
Witnesses as you state above nor did he finance the group in the beginning as you state. There is no reference that I am aware of that proves otherwise.
766:
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —
713:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
405:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
608:
After repeated attempts thankfully Jeffro failed to delete the Peters article. The quiet and goodly man was not forgotten and conveniently buried by JW editors.
218:
higher than "Low", because if if they didn't really do much, that lack of action probably had at least a somewhat significant effect on the group they head.
752:. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Knowledge policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the
37:
184:
I'm not sure what you're on about with regard to 'glorifying
Russell'. The current wording says nothing about Russell being a 'leader'. The 1880
70:
136:
Regarding your claim that "The Conley house memorials or passovers are not CTR events as you are claiming", Russell wrote in the April 1880
639:
357:
304:
503:
I realized a limitation about someone today. I will be giggling about how he compensates for this limitation/fault for days. :)
749:
684:
376:
96:
745:
730:
702:
688:
394:
380:
323:
75:
55:
50:
17:
108:
65:
753:
706:
398:
80:
709:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at
401:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at
104:
45:
31:
671:
227:
124:
112:
92:
23:
770:
720:
629:
347:
294:
169:
be what
Russell passed on to the flock. Maybe you can figure out what Conley passed on to the flock.
625:
343:
290:
111:
can also be very useful, and if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on
595:
571:
532:
491:
467:
422:
265:
203:
159:
85:
60:
648:
366:
313:
667:
223:
119:
767:
717:
581:
Over a month later, and the 'article' is still the same two sentences that it was then.--
100:
26:. Feel free to contribute in any way you can. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
663:
582:
558:
519:
478:
454:
409:
252:
190:
146:
763:
until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
644:
362:
309:
636:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
543:
504:
436:
354:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
301:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
237:
170:
738:
711:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/George Nathaniel Henry Peters (2nd nomination)
695:
638:
387:
356:
620:
338:
285:
303:
716:
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —
773:
723:
675:
652:
599:
575:
551:
536:
512:
495:
471:
444:
426:
408:
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.
370:
317:
269:
245:
231:
207:
178:
163:
126:
99:. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the
633:
351:
298:
214:
761:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/George Nathaniel Henry Peters
403:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/George Nathaniel Henry Peters
748:, which you created or to which you contributed, should be
628:
and Knowledge pages that have open discussion, you should
346:
and Knowledge pages that have open discussion, you should
293:
and Knowledge pages that have open discussion, you should
624:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
542:
What are you talking about on my talk page now Jeffro?
342:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
289:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
518:
A mildly amusing breach of policy, but hardly clever.--
451:
22:
to Knowledge! I hope you like this place and want to
42:
That way, others will know who left which comments.
744:A discussion has begun about whether the article
61:Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
95:! Though we all make silly mistakes, here is
8:
450:that it would be a candidate for deletion.
91:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
251:was funded by both Russell and Conley.--
39:Always sign your posts on talk pages!
34:and tell others a bit about yourself.
7:
433:hopes it will be protected from you.
30:If you haven't already, drop by the
705:, an article that you created, for
397:, an article that you created, for
14:
759:The article will be discussed at
737:
694:
637:
619:
386:
355:
337:
302:
284:
774:04:09, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
1:
746:George Nathaniel Henry Peters
731:George Nathaniel Henry Peters
703:George Nathaniel Henry Peters
689:George Nathaniel Henry Peters
395:George Nathaniel Henry Peters
381:George Nathaniel Henry Peters
324:George Nathanial Henry Peters
46:The Five Pillars of Knowledge
71:How to write a great article
789:
724:22:11, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
127:23:19, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
676:16:07, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
653:02:22, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
600:14:31, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
576:11:43, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
552:02:44, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
537:02:07, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
513:23:54, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
496:02:40, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
472:02:34, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
445:02:31, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
427:01:32, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
179:00:17, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
103:or add a question to the
547:
508:
440:
371:14:34, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
329:Exact quote was copied.
318:17:21, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
270:08:35, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
246:21:32, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
241:
232:16:37, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
208:08:36, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
174:
164:06:56, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
685:Articles for deletion
377:Articles for deletion
97:what Knowledge is not
658:Notice of discussion
664:WP:WQA#User:Bradsp
477:one who decides.--
138:Zion's Watch Tower
86:Knowledge Glossary
76:Naming conventions
56:How to edit a page
51:Simplified Ruleset
701:I have nominated
615:Your recent edits
393:I have nominated
333:Your recent edits
280:Your recent edits
113:my user talk page
780:
741:
698:
641:
623:
592:
587:
568:
563:
529:
524:
488:
483:
464:
459:
419:
414:
390:
359:
341:
306:
288:
262:
257:
200:
195:
156:
151:
122:
109:Community Portal
66:Picture tutorial
20:
788:
787:
783:
782:
781:
779:
778:
777:
754:deletion policy
742:
735:
699:
692:
660:
632:by typing four
630:sign your posts
617:
588:
583:
564:
559:
525:
520:
484:
479:
460:
455:
415:
410:
391:
384:
350:by typing four
348:sign your posts
335:
327:
297:by typing four
295:sign your posts
282:
258:
253:
196:
191:
152:
147:
134:
120:
81:Manual of Style
18:
12:
11:
5:
786:
784:
736:
734:
729:Nomination of
727:
693:
691:
687:nomination of
682:
680:
659:
656:
616:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
603:
602:
540:
539:
501:
500:
499:
498:
474:
434:
385:
383:
379:nomination of
374:
334:
331:
326:
321:
281:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
234:
219:
133:
130:
89:
88:
83:
78:
73:
68:
63:
58:
53:
48:
43:
35:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
785:
776:
775:
772:
769:
764:
762:
757:
755:
751:
747:
740:
732:
728:
726:
725:
722:
719:
714:
712:
708:
704:
697:
690:
686:
683:
681:
678:
677:
673:
669:
666:. Thank you.
665:
657:
655:
654:
650:
646:
640:
635:
631:
627:
622:
614:
607:
606:
605:
604:
601:
597:
593:
591:
586:
580:
579:
578:
577:
573:
569:
567:
562:
554:
553:
549:
545:
538:
534:
530:
528:
523:
517:
516:
515:
514:
510:
506:
497:
493:
489:
487:
482:
475:
473:
469:
465:
463:
458:
452:
448:
447:
446:
442:
438:
435:
431:
430:
429:
428:
424:
420:
418:
413:
406:
404:
400:
396:
389:
382:
378:
375:
373:
372:
368:
364:
358:
353:
349:
345:
340:
332:
330:
325:
322:
320:
319:
315:
311:
305:
300:
296:
292:
287:
279:
271:
267:
263:
261:
256:
249:
248:
247:
243:
239:
235:
233:
229:
225:
220:
216:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
199:
194:
187:
183:
182:
181:
180:
176:
172:
166:
165:
161:
157:
155:
150:
143:
139:
131:
129:
128:
125:
123:
116:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
87:
84:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
67:
64:
62:
59:
57:
54:
52:
49:
47:
44:
41:
40:
36:
33:
29:
28:
27:
25:
21:
765:
758:
743:
733:for deletion
715:
700:
679:
661:
618:
589:
584:
565:
560:
555:
541:
526:
521:
502:
485:
480:
461:
456:
416:
411:
407:
392:
336:
328:
283:
259:
254:
197:
192:
185:
167:
153:
148:
145:incorrect.--
141:
137:
135:
118:Good luck! -
117:
105:village pump
90:
38:
32:New user log
24:stick around
16:Hi, Bradsp,
15:
668:John Carter
662:Please see
224:John Carter
186:Watch Tower
121:Chairman S.
768:Parent5446
718:Parent5446
626:talk pages
344:talk pages
291:talk pages
101:help pages
93:Wikipedian
557:future.--
707:deletion
399:deletion
750:deleted
645:SineBot
363:SineBot
310:SineBot
189:them.--
19:Welcome
634:tildes
585:Jeffro
561:Jeffro
544:BradSp
522:Jeffro
505:BradSp
481:Jeffro
457:Jeffro
437:BradSp
412:Jeffro
352:tildes
299:tildes
255:Jeffro
238:BACnet
193:Jeffro
171:BradSp
149:Jeffro
132:Conley
107:. The
215:Jesus
142:their
140:that
672:talk
649:talk
596:talk
572:talk
548:talk
533:talk
509:talk
492:talk
468:talk
441:talk
423:talk
367:talk
314:talk
266:talk
242:talk
228:talk
204:talk
175:talk
160:talk
756:.
674:)
651:)
643:--
598:)
590:77
574:)
566:77
550:)
535:)
527:77
511:)
494:)
486:77
470:)
462:77
453:--
443:)
425:)
417:77
369:)
361:--
316:)
308:--
268:)
260:77
244:)
230:)
206:)
198:77
177:)
162:)
154:77
115:.
771:☯
721:☯
670:(
647:(
594:(
570:(
546:(
531:(
507:(
490:(
466:(
439:(
421:(
365:(
312:(
264:(
240:(
226:(
202:(
173:(
158:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.