279:
239:
204:
164:
115:
18:
259:
I think the article is okay as a
Knowledge (XXG) biography. The outing of Paulk by Besen is well documented, and the article cites those documents. Paulk's problems that came as a result are not problems Knowledge (XXG) can fix certainly not by deleting an article talking about Besen. The damage has
187:
working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions
104:
The article in question covered several people at once along with several topics. I don't think there are articles that violate Wiki's rules as much as that one. It should only take a reader pointing it out to an editor (who hides behind a fake name or not... seriously, how proud are you of Wiki,
246:
A valid reason was given for removal of the article several times but other editors kept bringing the article back claiming there is no such rule that I stated. I think I've proven my point on two fronts: a) This article is a violation and b) wikipedia needs professional editors. Thank you.
76:
Knowledge (XXG) has issues. Reference: See recent news stories of
Pedophiles modifying Wiki pages to make them more "accepting" to pedophilism. Also, Xmodem reference credits Byrds with adding Xmodem-CRC when this was actually done by myself back in the same time period.
142:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you.
256:
You did not prove your reason, whatever it was. You did not specify what part of the rule you were talking about. Was it that you thought Besen wrote the article about himself? You did not prove that.
287:
33:
policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should
179:. While Knowledge (XXG) welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying
89:. It is a good idea to read some of the current deletion discussions to get a feel for how the process works before you start nominating.
138:
132:
85:
Hi. Just responding from the comments at
Helpdesk. If you think an article should not be on Knowledge (XXG), read the instructions at
30:
26:
133:
282:
Welcome to
Knowledge (XXG). Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you
139:
168:
22:
242:
Binksternet-- The article was removed due to violation of
Knowledge (XXG) rules. See the following page for the rules:
52:
articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
59:
184:
123:
295:
94:
119:
265:
228:
193:
105:
huh?) to get it cleaned up. It would seem that is not the case. I remain miffed but not surprised.
220:
248:
291:
212:
148:
90:
69:
261:
224:
189:
21:
Welcome to
Knowledge (XXG). If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
283:
86:
216:
207:
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on
Knowledge (XXG), as you did to
180:
68:
to the
Knowledge (XXG) article or website of your organization in other articles (see
243:
144:
172:
130:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
208:
176:
17:
299:
269:
232:
197:
152:
98:
290:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -
188:
of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you.
62:
about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
215:. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
127:
122:
and
Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion, you should
175:. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article,
286:
while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the
223:
if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
118:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
211:, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
244:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Your_first_article
8:
183:. If you post your comments there, other
29:. In keeping with Knowledge (XXG)'s
7:
25:on Knowledge (XXG), you may have a
14:
277:
237:
202:
162:
137:
131:
113:
16:
1:
300:06:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
270:04:57, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
233:03:07, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
198:03:06, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
153:03:00, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
99:02:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
315:
219:. Please make use of the
167:Hello, and thank you for
39:exercise great caution
23:you have written about
31:neutral point of view
70:Knowledge (XXG):Spam
60:deletion discussions
27:conflict of interest
260:already been done.
169:your contributions
284:assume good faith
109:Your recent edits
306:
281:
280:
241:
240:
206:
205:
166:
165:
141:
135:
117:
116:
20:
314:
313:
309:
308:
307:
305:
304:
303:
278:
238:
203:
173:Knowledge (XXG)
163:
160:
126:by typing four
124:sign your posts
114:
111:
83:
12:
11:
5:
312:
310:
275:
274:
273:
272:
257:
159:
156:
110:
107:
103:
82:
79:
74:
73:
63:
53:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
311:
302:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
271:
267:
263:
258:
255:
254:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:User:bwilcutt
245:
235:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
200:
199:
195:
191:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
157:
155:
154:
150:
146:
140:
134:
129:
125:
121:
108:
106:
101:
100:
96:
92:
88:
80:
78:
71:
67:
64:
61:
57:
56:participating
54:
51:
47:
44:
43:
42:
40:
36:
32:
28:
24:
19:
292:Purplewowies
288:welcome page
276:
236:
213:edit summary
201:
161:
158:January 2012
112:
102:
91:Tigerboy1966
84:
75:
65:
55:
49:
45:
38:
34:
15:
262:Binksternet
225:Binksternet
209:Wayne Besen
190:Binksternet
177:Wayne Besen
120:talk pages
181:talk page
217:reverted
81:Deletion
50:creating
221:sandbox
185:editors
145:SineBot
66:linking
46:editing
128:tildes
87:WP:AFD
41:when:
35:avoid
296:talk
266:talk
229:talk
194:talk
149:talk
95:talk
171:to
136:or
58:in
48:or
37:or
298:)
268:)
231:)
196:)
151:)
143:--
97:)
72:).
294:(
264:(
227:(
192:(
147:(
93:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
