1374:
hard to prove. Items like " chosen by the U.S. government as its official tableware " certainly make the company notable, which is why the article is good to add. I've tagged it, and many of your other articles with the cleanup tag and someone will come around and clean them to better present soon. If you'd like some help with articles you write, you can always add the wikify or cleanup tags yourself ... they are {{subst:wikify}} and {{subst:cleanup}} . Simply add them to the top of your article to flag them as in need of review for copyediting or wikification. Best --
1341:, the full text of the template is called for and inserted each time the page is loaded. Subtle but important difference -- in the case of welcome messages, new users may get more benefit by being able to see, modify, and copy the markup language involved in the message; in the case of vandalism warnings, substing them reduces server load and makes sure that future changes to the template don't change the content of the warnings. Ultimately, it's not the biggest deal, either way, but occassionally people go through and subst a few templates. Hope that makes sense. :)
982:
as a significant expert in their area by independent sources. *The person is regarded as an important figure by those in the same field. *The person has published a large quantity of academic work (of at least reasonable quality). *The person has published a significant or well-known academic work. *The person is known for originating an important new concept, theory or idea. *The person is known for being the advisor of an especially notable student. *The person has received a notable award or honor, or has been often nominated for them.
252:. Here you will notice that if you start with the Troy-US lock on the eastern side of the canal (which takes the Hudson River at 1.4 feet and raises it 14' to 15.3 feet, the start of the Erie Canal, and add all of the lift elevations the math works out perfectly (thus I do not see a difference between any other locks). If you can confirm that the table data is wrong, though, please identify the source and modify it. Otherwise, I think the table you created is ready for publication.
493:
article (because many have little content for now) you could do that; still create individual articles in your user space, then replace the merged article with the new separate articles when they are ready. (The merge decision, being made on the basis of very little content, wouldn't really apply at that point--although you would want to leave a note on each article's discussion page explaining what you did and why, to forestall additional deletion attempts.
31:
348:. I guess now we can work on merging the photographic and textual information into the Erie Canal article or a subarticle on the locks. I can take over if you've gotten bored with this or something. btw, I'm happy to help newcomers if you ever have a question or need help with something. Just leave a msg at my talk page. In the meantime, cheers and happy editing! --
857:
1306:
This is a project I recently started, when I saw that there is quite a number of works by Van Gogh in Wiki-Commons, yet not link to any page in
Knowledge. The idea is to get the Van Gogh biography on the main page straight and strong - or to have a separate page on the artist's career, with a summary
492:
Don't let the deletionists bully you into speedy deleting your own articles. In a perfect world, you might have written the articles on user subpages and then put them in main space when there was more meat to them, and this might still be a solution. If the final decision is to merge them into one
456:
Chairboy: Thanks for pointing out the article. My intention was to standardize the way the canal pages look as the ones that existed were very mismatched with different tables, etc. Once I revised the standard table template, I added it to each new lock page so that it would be consistently used.
1055:
intended to be a User Page, the method you used would work, but unfortunately leaves a
Redirect. I also might be a little concerned with how to determine the intent of the author - maybe a quick question on their Talk page to determine what they were trying to do? Edits to someone else's User Page
985:
I presume you would establish notability based on the first and/or second criteria, however neither is necessarily established in the article. Regardless, I suppose this discussion is academic for as you point out, no offical guideline is yet established to benchmark these articles against. Best.
981:
If an academic/professor meets any one of the following conditions, they are definitely notable. If an academic/professor meets none of these conditions, they may still be notable, and the merits of an article on the academic/professor will depend largely on verifiability. *The person is regarded
387:
KChase, thanks for your help. AFA the pictures go, I can help with that but time is limited. I think the pics are nice, but there is no real encylopedic value to most of what's written. I really don't know what to do with them. It'd be good to work on other projects with you. Thx for your help.
1389:
Hi CPAScott. I hope this gets to you. I'm sorry I did something I shouldn't have done. I'm completely new to
Knowledge. Any help is appreciated. I'm still working on SmartWare and linking it to relevant places within Knowledge. As you can see, SmartWare is mentioned, so providing an explanation and
1373:
Hey Bloger, thanks for the note. I noticed you corrected the word our (although the grammatically correct word is "their" not "there". I think Non-NPOV still remains in the article, however. For example -- the first sentence describes the company as a "A world leader". That kind of statement is
1147:
Apologies. I'm still getting used to the fact that someone else will actually look at my Talk page. You're, obviously, one of my mentors (inasmuch as you've edited some pages and responded to queries) in the steep learning curve that is
Knowledge (although I'm familiar with programming in basic raw
1069:
Thanks, Satori Son, except one thing -- using {{db-bio}} tag is what I'm trying to get away from for articles that do nothing more than talk about the user. I come across this for new users (I've yet to see it for a user who already has an established user page). I'd use the vanity tags, but that
1000:
If we are to use those criteria, the article clearly passes by criteria 4, "the person has published a significant or well-known academic work." I refer to an important work of his in the second sentence, which is directly supported by a NYTimes article referenced by in-line citation. In any case,
175:
A worthwhile suggestion if we expand the table under the locks section to include much of what is in the table on each lock page. I, however, didn't start to create the pages. The first 10 or so were already created. I simply cleaned up the tables (made them consistent) and added pages for the
1113:
Shouldn't there be a way for you to make your archive uneditable? I was coming here to ask you something else entirely but, having found your Talk page empty but for the link to the archive, I clicked on it and found all the edit links still available ... I guess you could be always reverting if
1154:
I came to your Talk page ORIGINALLY to ask you about the Muddy Brook/Maberly merge and whether you also meant
Elliston. I ran out of time to ask that question here because of becoming intrigued by the question of protecting an archive and by the time that I came back to the puter, you'd already
1124:
Only admins have the power to protect or semi-protect a page. Even though such a talk archive is meant to be a permanent record, it is simply a sub-page for the user's talk page and thus can be edited by anyone at anytime. The best thing to do it to put a big formatted box message at the top
228:
KChase02: Good work on the table! I've revised it slightly to include both downstream and upstream elevations. AFAIK, the level of the canal changes only once other than by lock, between locks 33 and 34, not 34 and 35. Most of the information about the elevation and lift is coming from two
645:
I reverted because you carried out a copy and paste move, which, under the GDFL is not permitted, as it splits the article page histories. If you want to change the title of the article, please use the "move" feature of the
Mediawiki software instead. Once you've done that, I can restore your
1336:
does offer some explanation, but as you requested, I won't just mention it and drop the issue. First, the difference between substitution and transclusion -- when a template is substituted, its contents are (more or less) copy-pasted onto the page in question, where when a template is
339:
The AfD was closed before I could post a comment, but here's the gist. To insert signature's automatically, type four tildes, like this ~~~~ or just click the signature button in the row of buttons hugging the top of the edit box (third from the right). Jazz up your signature
1070:
doesn't necessarily guarantee that the offending article will be deleted or deleted in a timely manner. I do concede that the db-bio tag will work, but I also am aware there is probably a better option. It is this option I'm trying to master. Additional comments welcome.
665:
OK, so now I understand (which I didn't before -- thank you for explaining it). I will need to research the "move" feature of the
Mediawiki software (which I am also not aware). Once I figure it out, I will request that you revert my changes to the new file. Regards
298:
I reinserted the name of the next lock in the last column. Though it's determinable from the table itself, it takes a minute, and the info doesn't take up much room. I replaced n/a for mileages with "data unavailable" which is more informative, imo. I added a sources
762:. The real problem is somebody noticed that the old west lawman linked to the astronaut, and simply delinked the lawman and created a bunch of redirects and links to go to the astronaut. With a reasonably common name shared by many people, that's crass.
1040:
Hi. Can you help me? While patrolling new pages, I came across what looked like a user page created in the mainspace. I moved the article. (See above). Did I do this correctly? If not, what is the best protocol to clean such articles? Thanks.
757:
Okay, it's sort of fixed. But "Charles
Bassett" still goes to the astronaut. I really need a way to fix things so his page is renamed Charles Bassett (astronaut) or something, so that this doesn't happen. Then in the disambig page I can link it to
1168:
No apologies. This is exactly where you should post a question. No one will answer a question posted on your talk page, 'cause we won't know it's there! I was kidding with Satori Son for answering your question on my talk page. Anywho ...
935:). This is because speedy deletion is generally for "patent nonsense" or "pure vandalism." However, if an article doesn't fit these criteria, and you still don't think an article is notable, then you can put the article up for deletion using
158:
I noticed you were creating pages for Erie Canal locks. Would it be possible to integrate the content on those pages into the Erie Canal page itself? It's a bit of a pain to have to click through all the pages to find out the relevant info.
1189:
Yeah, I was always the nerd on the front row with his hand up. Sorry for butting in, but I can never resist giving a completely unsolicited opinion. Anyways, here's the template I was referring to: {{talkarchive}}. Best of luck.
1098:
I'd read a little bit in the welcome pages before and read about the four tildes but I hadn't clued in to what they were actually for. I guess it's not too bad for someone who editted their first Wiki page less than 48h ago ... :)
1056:
can be a touchy subject, so best to err on the side of caution. In the past, I have had the most success by simply tagging the page with the {{db-bio}} template. Hope my humble opinion is helpful, and keep up the great work! --
305:
As to the older subpages, I don't think we'll get a consensus at AfD to delete them outright. I'd suggest waiting to see if consensus emerges to merge them or keep them. I'll put a comment there to let them know what we're doing.
921:. This is unfounded, as he is the subject of a New York Times article published this very day (this is in the article). Please look more closely next time you label articles for speedy. Would you mind taking the tag off?
233:). Note that, for example, the sign for 34/35 at Lockport shows the downstream elevation as 514.9 but the sign for lock 33 shows the upstream elevation as 512.9. As such, I believe the elevation change to occur there.
1291:
is building up a number of articles on Van Gogh and had just started this one. I guess it's his way of working. You might like to explain to him what happened if you've got time, or make a mental note for the future.
1577:
indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
468:
Anyway, please wait to delete the Erie Canal pages until we can transfer all the data from the boxes into the master list on the Erie Canal page. I'll delete the pages for all locks without information once that is
194:
Hey, I'm happy work with you on transferring the canal lock pages. My concern is what to do about the one's that have paragraphs of text in addition to the tables (I assume those are the older ones. Any ideas?
1569:. Knowledge gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Knowledge, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an
1028:
Since this article was deleted without my knowledge I wanted to put it back up. I have no content right now because the article was deleted. I am hoping someone who added content before helps out again.
621:
to
Knowledge articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior.
438:
Crikey, I see you've also made a bunch of similar articles for Erie Canal locks. Can you expand them all into articles asap? If not, I suggest amalgamating them into a list in a single article. -
209:
OK, I did a rough draft of the table on a subpage in your userspace. Let me know what you think at the subpage and I'll paste the code right into the article once we're happy with the final copy.
952:, it notes that there is not enough consensus for there to be a policy. Thus, in order to delete pages that assert importance, the page has to be assessed on a case-by-case basis at
1227:
1310:
So would you please remove the tag, and let me continue to work. I had 2 (two!) minutes indeed, while I was preparing the stub-tag and the cat's, to find the page merged.
336:
I think we've done a good job, and I moved the table into the Erie Canal page. I think that will spur enough to officially "merge" the other pages and eliminate them.
1125:
indicating what the page is and asking others to please not edit it. Providing a prominent link back to the active talk page would probably help, too. Good luck. --
1550:
Jeff -- good catch. Funny thing is, like you, I work on links to disambig. pages so I should of caught this myself. Anyway, thanks for fixing the links. Best --
176:
other locks so additional information can be added. I'm working on all of the canal pages in the NY State Canal System ... will revisit this issue later. Thanks.
457:
I suppose the proper procedure is to wait until the page is created as an article and then, if it doesn't match the other pages, adjust it then. Is that correct?
282:
Lastly, as for the individual lock pages, I suggest deleting them all. The ones that existed before have interesting picutres, but add little informational value.
1114:
people edit the archive but wouldn't that get annoying? It's a possibility that I'll be wanting to know in several months so it never hurts to ask in advance.
1407:
1138:
LOL, Yes -- see? You asked a question on MY talk page and SOMEONE ELSE edited the page to answer your question! (Just kiddin' with ya, Satori Son). --
1358:
My expertise is not in wikipedia but rather in the subject I wrote about, so the wikipedia laws can be a little massed up in a lengthy article I make.
1001:
thank you for removing the speedy note. For future reference, only add speedy tags to clear-cut cases. For cases in which you have any doubts, use
1156:
128:
932:
112:
267:
As for the mileage that is unknown, I think we should just list it as "n/a" for now. If someone knows it, they can modify the table later.
1601:
931:
Biographies may only be speedy deleted (not counting nonsense, vandalism, etc.) if they don't assert importance (this is the wording of
88:
to
Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
881:
345:
1442:) is only for a person or a group of people, not a website; also, in this case, there was an assertion of notability. Please use {{
416:
Please don't create empty pages. The canal lock pages are being deleted because they contain nothing but an infobox. Please see
1574:
972:
1443:
894:
522:
Could you please explain why nothing was moved to the destination article when you turned "Hong Kong, China" into a redirect?
1600:. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at
1590:
1570:
606:
599:
1478:
I am a new user. I think I see you put a note for pass with flying colors. I created an request entry for it. Best regards.
131:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
1467:
97:
85:
66:
508:
per your question on the Erie Canal discussion, you can sign/date/time comments with 2 dashes and 4 tildes: --~~~~.--
302:
I'm not sure how to notate Locks 34 and 35. They seem to be at the same location. Do you know what's going on there?
1585:
867:
856:
845:
841:
38:
759:
117:
1536:, it is a disambiguation page, and ideally should not have any links to it. Instead pick a better link, as in
210:
1566:
816:
1361:
As per the word “our” you are right what happened was that I quoted there website. I have corrected it.
675:
Sorry, you seem to have misunderstood. There is a tab at the top of every page saying "move". Use that. —
623:
92:
1391:
560:
546:
531:
124:
812:
1479:
1248:
Sorry, couldn't tell ya. Know nothing of the subject matter ... just tryin' to fix broken links. --
949:
589:
618:
341:
132:
588:
they define as being authorized when an article's sole author removes all of an article's text. --
1424:
1415:
1010:
957:
940:
922:
632:
578:
446:
428:
353:
311:
218:
200:
185:
164:
107:
47:
17:
1034:
844:. I am happy to announce that you are now authorized for use, so if you haven't already, simply
139:
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --
1497:
701:
683:
654:
1510:
Done. I moved the first paragraph around a bit to get the subject in the first sentence per
1464:
1342:
1329:
1307:
on the main page and links to the individual pages on single paintings and groups of works.
1235:
811:
I speedied the thing. Is that a bad idea? I can't imagine an entry for every German pronoun.
557:
543:
528:
494:
948:
By the way, in response to your question, there is no official policy for "notability". At
480:
Thanks for the heads up. Relatively new here, but trying to add value to the encyclopedia!
1453:
1435:
1431:
1333:
1281:
1231:
1191:
1126:
1084:
1057:
918:
971:
I've removed the tag per your request. As far as academic biographies go, the following
249:
1148:
HTML so it's not throwing me off too much). I'll ask any further questions I have on my
1597:
1325:
1002:
509:
1551:
1541:
1537:
1515:
1511:
1449:
1439:
1411:
1375:
1338:
1293:
1267:
1249:
1213:
1179:
1170:
1160:
1139:
1115:
1100:
1071:
1042:
1006:
987:
953:
936:
826:
793:
776:
773:
768:
763:
745:
735:
732:
727:
722:
667:
585:
439:
421:
417:
389:
349:
307:
230:
214:
196:
181:
160:
144:
102:
1554:
1544:
1518:
1504:
1482:
1418:
1400:
1394:
1378:
1367:
1345:
1314:
1296:
1270:
1261:
1258:
1252:
1242:
1239:
1216:
1194:
1182:
1173:
1163:
1142:
1129:
1118:
1103:
1087:
1074:
1060:
1045:
1013:
990:
960:
943:
925:
907:
829:
819:
796:
779:
748:
738:
696:
678:
670:
649:
635:
592:
563:
549:
534:
512:
497:
450:
432:
392:
357:
315:
222:
204:
189:
168:
148:
1406:
I speedy kept it after author added some useful content. Hope you don't mind. See
1501:
1461:
1457:
1364:
1311:
1288:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1532:
Please, when making a link with the word "American", don't link to the article
1324:
Hey, there. I did spend some time substing templates, the other day, mainly {{
893:
If you have any queries, please feel free to contact me or post a message on
898:
1533:
1526:
140:
1390:
an article about the history seemed logical to me. Kind regards. Han.
1083:
It looks like you've since figured out the proper procedure. Thanks.
1500:. If you agree, I'd remove the insufficient context banner. Thanks.
1257:
My mistake: didn't look closely enough, thought you had added it. —
527:
Did you recognise the two articles serve very different purposes? —
420:
article 1 regarding empty articles or those without any context. -
180:
I'll see what I can do to that table. Cheers and happy editing! --
792:
I can help with that. Where is the page for Bassett the lawman?
721:
Hold your horses-- I'm in the middle of this, and not good at it.
1581:
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
1238:
gets a life peerage it must be as "Lyttelton of Somewhere". —
229:
sources -- the information signs on the locks themselves (see
25:
1287:
Full marks for speed, but I thought I should point out that
744:
LOL. That's OK, me either. I keep learning as I go! Best,
878:
Please join the VandalProof user category by adding either:
248:
Beyond these sign photos, my other source is a .pdf file at
491:
My opinion is to keep a separate article on each lock: -->
1234:
is an existing hereditary peerage created in 1794; so if
610:
554:
540:
525:
523:
1228:
List of Viscounts in the Peerage of the United Kingdom
250:
http://www.eriecanal.org/images/misc/canal_profile.jpg
1155:
answered that question on the Discussion page at the
917:Hey, I noticed you put a speedy on my new article,
840:Hi, CPAScott/Archive 1, thank you for applying for
574:Thanks for the heads up. I have now tagged it with
231:http://www.galenfrysinger.com/erie_canal_locks.htm
646:improvements for you if you so wish. Cheers, —
8:
1561:License tagging for Image:Gideon Granger.jpg
1408:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Indrabhishek
1452:}} in these cases in future, rather than {{
1434:}} tag on this page; I have removed it. {{
1302:Van Gogh paintings and groups of paintings
1212:People shouldn't edit archives anyway. :)
123:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
1355:Hi there, thank you for taking the time.
846:download VandalProof from our main page
1514:. Revise as you feel appropriate. --
617:that attempts to recognize and repair
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1109:Is there a way to protect an archive?
848:and install it, and you're all set!
7:
1159:page. I'm WATCHing and learning. :)
851:
1602:Knowledge:Media copyright questions
631:about the bot and this warning. //
135:, ask me on my talk page, or place
1230:: As is shown by the linked page,
886:(which will add this user box) or
882:User:Vishwin60/Userbox/VandalProof
344:. Ah, also, merger information is
24:
855:
29:
1596:This is an automated notice by
1540:by writing out ]. Regards, --
84:Hello, CPAScott/Archive 1, and
1604:. 21:07, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
1591:Knowledge:Image copyright tags
607:Sonnenberg Mansion and Gardens
600:Sonnenberg Mansion and Gardens
556:- for your information. :-) —
1:
93:The five pillars of Knowledge
973:proposed Knowledge guideline
113:How to write a great article
1555:12:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
1545:04:13, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
1519:18:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
1505:16:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
1483:14:56, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
1419:07:29, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
1395:23:42, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
1379:19:58, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
1368:19:51, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
1351:Thank you & explanation
1346:15:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
1315:22:02, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1297:21:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1271:21:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1262:04:38, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
1253:03:31, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
1243:03:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
1217:22:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
1195:23:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
1183:17:25, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
1174:16:51, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
1164:01:08, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
1143:16:48, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
1130:16:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
1119:15:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
1104:04:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
1618:
1586:Knowledge:Image use policy
1496:I completed the entry for
1088:15:12, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
1075:17:23, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
1061:17:20, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
1046:04:42, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
1014:20:23, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
991:19:05, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
961:16:58, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
944:16:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
926:16:44, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
908:08:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
830:20:32, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
820:20:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
797:19:26, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
780:19:23, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
749:19:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
739:19:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
629:frequently asked questions
897:. Welcome to our team! -
671:11:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
636:10:45, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
593:22:45, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
564:21:05, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
550:20:31, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
542:- Thank you very much. —
535:17:08, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
504:Automatic time/date stamp
1567:Image:Gideon Granger.jpg
866:This user is armed with
513:14:15, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
498:16:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
451:01:42, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
433:01:35, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
393:16:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
358:21:04, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
316:23:44, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
223:22:41, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
211:User:CPAScott/Erie locks
205:20:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
190:01:31, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
169:00:36, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
149:02:43, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
1460:14:26, 29 August 2006 (
895:VandalProof's talk page
836:Welcome to VandalProof!
1575:image description page
1094:Thanks for the Welcome
817:User_talk:Mikereichold
1565:Thanks for uploading
1334:template substitution
613:) was reverted by an
42:of past discussions.
1328:}} through 4, and {{
1320:Re: Subst: templates
605:Your recent edit to
890:to your user page.
864:Warning to Vandals:
690:11:25, 25 July '06
661:11:12, 25 July '06
133:Knowledge:Questions
708:13:41, 25 July '06
98:How to edit a page
18:User talk:CPAScott
1498:Time-bin encoding
1489:Time-bin encoding
1051:If a new page is
875:
874:
813:User:Mikereichold
443:
425:
72:
71:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1609:
1332:}}. The page on
1236:Viscount Chandos
904:
865:
859:
852:
771:
766:
730:
725:
704:
699:
693:Done. Cheers, —
686:
681:
657:
652:
583:
577:
518:Hong Kong, China
441:
423:
154:Erie canal locks
138:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1617:
1616:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1573:applied to the
1563:
1530:
1491:
1476:
1430:You placed a {{
1428:
1404:
1387:
1353:
1322:
1304:
1285:
1282:The Wheat Field
1232:Baron Lyttelton
1224:
1111:
1096:
1038:
1026:
983:
919:David L. Wagner
915:
913:David L. Wagner
900:
876:
863:
838:
809:
769:
764:
760:Charles Bassett
728:
723:
719:
702:
697:
684:
679:
655:
650:
643:
603:
590:Fuhghettaboutit
581:
575:
572:
520:
506:
414:
156:
136:
118:Manual of Style
77:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1615:
1613:
1594:
1593:
1588:
1562:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1529:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1490:
1487:
1475:
1472:
1448:
1427:
1422:
1403:
1398:
1392:Han van Heerde
1386:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1352:
1349:
1321:
1318:
1303:
1300:
1284:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1223:
1222:Lord Lyttelton
1220:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1153:
1152:Talk page. :)
1133:
1132:
1110:
1107:
1095:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1064:
1063:
1037:
1031:
1025:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
980:
979:
978:
977:
976:
966:
965:
964:
963:
914:
911:
873:
872:
860:
850:
837:
834:
833:
832:
808:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
785:
784:
783:
782:
752:
751:
718:
715:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
709:
642:
641:Re: Sonnenberg
639:
602:
596:
571:
568:
567:
566:
552:
519:
516:
505:
502:
501:
500:
487:
485:
484:
483:
482:
474:
473:
472:
471:
462:
461:
460:
459:
413:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
303:
300:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
269:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
240:
239:
238:
237:
236:
235:
207:
192:
155:
152:
129:sign your name
121:
120:
115:
110:
105:
100:
95:
76:
73:
70:
69:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1614:
1605:
1603:
1599:
1592:
1589:
1587:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1579:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1560:
1556:
1553:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1543:
1539:
1538:United States
1535:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1503:
1499:
1494:
1488:
1486:
1484:
1481:
1473:
1471:
1469:
1466:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1446:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1426:
1423:
1421:
1420:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1402:
1399:
1397:
1396:
1393:
1384:
1380:
1377:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1366:
1362:
1359:
1356:
1350:
1348:
1347:
1344:
1340:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1319:
1317:
1316:
1313:
1308:
1301:
1299:
1298:
1295:
1290:
1283:
1280:
1272:
1269:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1260:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1251:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1221:
1219:
1218:
1215:
1196:
1193:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1181:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1172:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1162:
1158:
1151:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1141:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1131:
1128:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1117:
1108:
1106:
1105:
1102:
1093:
1089:
1086:
1082:
1081:
1076:
1073:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1062:
1059:
1054:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1044:
1036:
1032:
1030:
1023:
1015:
1012:
1008:
1004:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
992:
989:
974:
970:
969:
968:
967:
962:
959:
955:
951:
950:WP:Notability
947:
946:
945:
942:
938:
934:
930:
929:
928:
927:
924:
920:
912:
910:
909:
906:
903:
896:
891:
889:
885:
883:
871:
869:
861:
858:
854:
853:
849:
847:
843:
835:
831:
828:
824:
823:
822:
821:
818:
814:
806:
798:
795:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
781:
778:
775:
772:
767:
761:
756:
755:
754:
753:
750:
747:
743:
742:
741:
740:
737:
734:
731:
726:
716:
707:
706:
705:
700:
692:
691:
689:
688:
687:
682:
674:
673:
672:
669:
664:
663:
662:
660:
659:
658:
653:
640:
638:
637:
634:
633:AntiVandalBot
630:
626:
625:
620:
616:
615:automated bot
612:
608:
601:
598:Your edit to
597:
595:
594:
591:
587:
580:
569:
565:
562:
559:
555:
553:
551:
548:
545:
541:
539:
538:
537:
536:
533:
530:
526:
524:
517:
515:
514:
511:
503:
499:
496:
490:
489:
488:
481:
478:
477:
476:
475:
470:
466:
465:
464:
463:
458:
454:
453:
452:
448:
444:
437:
436:
435:
434:
430:
426:
419:
411:
395:
394:
391:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
338:
337:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
317:
313:
309:
304:
301:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
283:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
268:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
253:
251:
246:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
234:
232:
226:
225:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
206:
202:
198:
193:
191:
187:
183:
179:
178:
177:
173:
172:
171:
170:
166:
162:
153:
151:
150:
146:
142:
134:
130:
126:
119:
116:
114:
111:
109:
106:
104:
101:
99:
96:
94:
91:
90:
89:
87:
82:
81:
74:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1595:
1580:
1564:
1531:
1495:
1492:
1485:StephenChao
1477:
1429:
1405:
1401:Indrabhishek
1388:
1363:
1360:
1357:
1354:
1323:
1309:
1305:
1286:
1225:
1211:
1178:Understood.
1149:
1112:
1097:
1052:
1039:
1027:
984:
916:
901:
892:
887:
879:
877:
862:
839:
810:
720:
695:
694:
677:
676:
648:
647:
644:
628:
622:
614:
604:
573:
521:
507:
486:
479:
467:
455:
415:
386:
281:
266:
247:
227:
174:
157:
122:
83:
79:
78:
60:
43:
37:
1480:Stephenchao
1425:Funfail.com
1343:Luna Santin
1339:transcluded
1033:Answers to
868:VandalProof
842:VandalProof
495:Thatcher131
412:Canal locks
36:This is an
1192:Satori Son
1127:Satori Son
1085:theProject
1058:Satori Son
1035:Sonny diaz
624:Click here
570:Lperez2029
137:{{helpme}}
125:Wikipedian
103:Help pages
1598:OrphanBot
1571:image tag
1525:links to
1474:Hi Scott.
1440:WP:CSD#A7
1385:SmartWare
825:I concur
619:vandalism
584:which at
579:db-author
510:Isotope23
469:complete.
127:! Please
67:Archive 2
61:Archive 1
1552:CPAScott
1542:Jeff3000
1534:American
1527:American
1516:CPAScott
1412:utcursch
1376:CPAScott
1294:Tyrenius
1268:Tyrenius
1250:CPAScott
1214:Tyrenius
1180:Iainsona
1171:CPAScott
1161:Iainsona
1140:CPAScott
1116:Iainsona
1101:Iainsona
1072:CPAScott
1043:CPAScott
988:CPAScott
827:CPAScott
794:CPAScott
746:CPAScott
717:Disambig
668:CPAScott
390:CPAScott
350:Kchase02
308:Kchase02
299:section.
215:Kchase02
197:Kchase02
182:Kchase02
161:Kchase02
108:Tutorial
80:Welcome!
1330:welcome
1259:Tamfang
1240:Tamfang
1157:Maberly
1053:clearly
1024:JunJiDo
1003:wp:prod
975:exists:
442:HAIRBOY
424:HAIRBOY
86:welcome
75:Welcome
39:archive
1512:WP:MOS
1502:UnHoly
1458:ais523
1456:}}. --
1454:db-bio
1436:db-bio
1432:db-bio
1365:Bloger
1289:R.P.D.
1011:JianLi
1007:wp:afd
958:JianLi
954:WP:AFD
941:JianLi
937:WP:AFD
933:CSD A7
923:JianLi
586:WP:CSD
561:ntnood
547:ntnood
532:ntnood
418:WP:CSD
1444:subst
1326:test1
1266:lol.
777:arris
736:arris
558:Insta
544:Insta
529:Insta
16:<
1493:Hi,
1450:prod
1438:}} (
1416:talk
807:Mich
698:Fire
680:Fire
651:Fire
627:for
611:diff
346:here
342:here
213:. --
145:talk
1312:RPD
1226:re
1150:OWN
1005:or
703:Fox
685:Fox
656:Fox
141:Nlu
1470:)
1414:|
1410:.
1190:--
1169:--
1009:.
956:.
939:.
899:Gl
884:}}
880:{{
815:|
582:}}
576:{{
449:)
431:)
356:)
314:)
306:--
221:)
203:)
195:--
188:)
167:)
159:--
147:)
1468:C
1465:T
1462:U
1447::
905:n
902:e
888:]
870:.
774:H
770:B
765:S
733:H
729:B
724:S
609:(
447:☎
445:(
440:C
429:☎
427:(
422:C
354:T
352:(
312:T
310:(
219:T
217:(
201:T
199:(
186:T
184:(
165:T
163:(
143:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.