586:) 15:42, 10 December 2009 (UTC) You say that people pronounce the "s" in "Nestor" as /z/?? I totally disagree. Try it yourself, make alveolar contact while producing the /s/ (and make it voiced at that) and you'll see it's a completely unnatural thing to do for a rioplatense accent. Before consonants, /s/ is realized as almost invariantly. I guess before pauses, in careful speech, /s/ could be realized as , so perhaps /"karlos/ could be instead of as it is now. But then again, the name is pronounced right before the last name, which begins with a consonant sound. As for the "r" in "Kirchner", I myself do not pronounce it, and neither do the native Argentineans in these recordings:
476:
363:"there are tons of reliable sources available" - often one argument is not inherently superior to the other. This is where additional input is helpful. If two arguments look equally strong at first glance, but one is supported by 8 users and the other by only 2, chances are the side with 8 supporters has a stronger case (assuming good faith, lack of sock puppetry, and such). So this is where the need for more input arises (point 3).
603:
underlying form of "Nestor" is /nestoɾ/ but rioplatense
Spanish has two allophones (or variants) of /s/: - a voiceless alveolar fricative (your tongue is in contact with the area just behind the upper front teeth - and - no tongue contact, constriction of air flow takes place farther back in the glottal area. In short, you do pronounce *something* but not in Nestor, which is why you perceive the *letter* "s" as being there.
958:
885:
802:
578:). Do you disagree with the pronunciation I give? It's meant to represent the most common Argentinean pronunciation of the name (what I hear most often from journalists, tv anchors and politicians), but of course (as with all pronunciations) there are bound to be variants. What pronunciation do you think wikipedia should give?
696:. This template refers to the talk page, but you did not add any suggestions on the talk pages as to how those articles need to be improved. The last comment on the first one was that the article was "Considerably better". Please note your objections on the talk pages, otherwise I propose to remove the tags. -
731:
Another admin has declined your proposed speedy deletion of this article. I objected to the deletion myself, but as I've been involved in editing the article I did not remove the speedy tag as I don't want to be seen to be abusing my admin powers. I've no objection to the article being nominated at
335:
Bias because all of your opinions aren't supported by any policy or guideline (like I said). Also, Knowledge (XXG) wouldn't run well with your opinions (per everything that I said) and no one agrees with you (Like I said). You obviously don't understand AFD (coming from someone who has participated
362:
50% "keep" can close as delete, and visa versa. That said, sometimes AfDs will come down to two competing views. If each side is represented by only 1 !vote it is hard to determine what the community as whole believes. Sometimes one argument is obviously stronger - compare "I don't like it" to
370:
If we didn't allow people to repeat points/say "per X" we would get into a situation where the first delete opinion perfectly stated that side and the first keep opinion perfectly stated that side, and no one else could comment because both sides had perfect arguments already. A reviewing admin
316:
Comment from admin on my talk page "Also, Joe is correct about the underlying issue here - an essay is just advice, not a rule and saying "per XYZ" most certainly is allowed and sometimes is helpful." If they didn't say anything, there would never be a concensus (which I already said). Forming a
366:
Ideally, additional !voters will have new points to add. I personally would almost never add my voice to an AfD if I had nothing new to add, and would never say "per X" regardless. However, sometimes the first one or two people have better much covered all the bases. In that case, additional
602:
Ok, I'll modify the pronunciation to reflect a more careful variant with an alveolar fricative for . However, for the /s/ in "Nestor" I insist that a pronunciation with would sound foreign in
Argentina. In phonology we make a clear distinction between written letters and spoken sounds. The
897:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before
Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
250:
Look at the top of the page and read the template that says "This essay contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors on Knowledge (XXG):Deletion policy. Essays may represent widespread norms or minority viewpoints. Consider these views with discretion."
970:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before
Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
751:
DO NOT DELETE:This person is a famous actor in
Argentina. He's done many tv shows and deserves a wiki page. I have put legit information and resources ! I don't understand why he would be nominated for a speedy deletion.--Scoobynaiter123 19:44, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
360:
All three of these things are true - the difficult part is sorting them out in a coherent way. The first factor - AfD is not a vote - is most certainly true. An admins task is to gauge consensus based on strength of argument, not vote counting. An AfD with :
336:
in hundreds of AFDs, got barnstars for my AFD work, got many good comments about my AFD work, and knows the notability guidelines by heart). Do you have any idea of how many AFDs would close as no consensus if they went by your opinions? A shit load.
356:
Let me see if I can clear this matter through a little explanation... Basically, we have a couple competing factors here: 1) AfD is not a vote; 2) "Per nom" !votes aren't particularly useful; 3) We need multiple !votes to judge consensus.
371:
could only legitimately close such an AfD as non consensus, even if it reality 90% of the community agreed with one side or the other. Thus "per X" votes certainly can be useful at times, even though they are weak arguments in general. --
998:
925:
732:
AfD, as that gives others (such as the
Article Rescue Squadron) the chance to make improvements. If it gets deleted via AfD then so be it. If you do nominate it at AfD, would you please drop me a line saying so?
843:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
297:
What do you want them to say when they think that seven reliable sources with significant coverage shows notability (which it does)? It's not like they will search for more sources when they think that
982:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
909:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
713:. I've just trimmed the article of uncited or non-notable primary source stuff, and added a paragraph about opposition. However, I think the section you tagged should stay roughly as it is. -
205:
I don't know the answer to your question. I'm not very knowledgeable about the technical side of the project, mainly focusing on editing articles and fighting vandalism. Try asking at
390:
Can you point me to where it is failing and i will try work out why, i suspect ti to do with the tempalte i have used to trancluded the data to lsit of hosue peisode--
768:
806:
367:
people saying "yeah I agree with that argument" can be helpful to the closing admin, as it shows which argument has been more persuasive.
1012:
939:
868:
454:
428:
403:
1042:
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting
415:
foudn the fault rtile needs to be added to ever episode liek this |RTitle= even tohugh it blank it causing a fault due to the template--
669:
123:
710:
127:
59:
1008:
935:
864:
620:
991:
918:
54:
177:
764:
214:
321:
need to comment. So your comments are bias (your strong opinions are only shared by a very small miniority or just you).
855:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
64:
1003:
930:
860:
689:
717:
700:
616:
37:
1043:
1036:
1025:
317:
consensus isn't pointless. If no one commented, that AFD and many others would be closed as no concensus. So they
590:. Perhaps we could settle on . Finally, does not stand for German "ch", but for "sch" (English "sh" in "show").
44:
33:
760:
448:
422:
397:
210:
979:
906:
71:
553:
756:
75:
663:
612:
119:
856:
485:
206:
87:
79:
714:
697:
49:
631:
99:
966:
893:
832:
823:
131:
595:
583:
571:
442:
416:
391:
376:
341:
326:
307:
288:
274:
256:
240:
975:
902:
852:
836:
574:) 22:24, 9 December 2009 (UTC) Thanks for commenting on my IPA pronunciation for Néstor Kirchner (
228:
549:
187:
40:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
540:
template that you added to the above page. Although the article was started quite poorly, the
86:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
812:
786:
737:
657:
114:
987:
914:
848:
840:
135:
1057:
191:
160:
990:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
983:
917:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
910:
851:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
844:
646:
638:
545:
475:
441:
All fixed now, i will add rtitle to the other season ready for conversion to the template--
95:
544:
did not qualify as patent nonsense. If you object to this, perhaps you could take it to
1053:
591:
579:
567:
534:
372:
337:
322:
303:
284:
270:
252:
236:
299:
511:
17:
782:
733:
1039:, but you haven't made any edits to the English Knowledge (XXG) in over 6 months.
957:
884:
781:...instead of whining and wailing, you could ask me for help. Or don't you think?—
587:
155:
693:
302:
is already met. Every keep is per me (you didn't complain about all of them).
524:
90:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place
1035:
You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at
994:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
921:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
839:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
645:. For articles that just have links and/or a rephrasing of the title,
181:
151:
575:
83:
709:
Thanks for your reply on my talk page. Please comment further at
1061:
1016:
943:
872:
817:
790:
741:
720:
703:
678:
624:
599:
557:
518:
460:
434:
409:
380:
345:
330:
311:
292:
278:
260:
244:
218:
195:
163:
140:
103:
997:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
924:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
474:
269:
posted. Longer or shorter, it is still the same comment.
978:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
905:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
541:
504:
at any time by removing the {{helpdeskreply}} template.
501:
831:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
530:Hi! Just to let you know that I have removed the
154:. Perhaps I'll have more luck with that sysop. --
470:
283:How is it not? What different meaning is there?
711:Talk:Emmanuel Schools Foundation#Article Issues
113:Your AfD was malformed and has been reverted.--
588:http://es.forvo.com/word/n%C3%A9stor_kirchner/
542:revision at the time of the speedy nomination
8:
146:RE: Justicialist Party & semi-protection
805:You are invited to join the discussion at
70:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
807:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Wikipediholism test
484:Hello Camr. Replies have been posted to
688:Hi, I note that you added a POV tag to
576:http://en.wikipedia.org/Nestor_Kirchner
490:If the problem is solved, please place
265:All of the other keeps were about what
231:is an essay like I already said. It is
1052:Message delivered to you with love by
611:I've responded to your comment on the
494:at the top of the section. Thank you!
150:Hi, I'm dealing with that issue again
94:before the question. Again, welcome!
7:
967:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
894:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
980:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
907:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
810:
45:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
951:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
878:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
176:There is a answer waiting for you
36:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
25:
857:review the candidates' statements
956:
883:
800:
1001:and submit your choices on the
928:and submit your choices on the
863:. For the Election committee,
833:Arbitration Committee election
824:ArbCom elections are now open!
684:POV tags added with no details
486:your question at the Help desk
1:
1044:Knowledge (XXG):Local Embassy
1037:Knowledge (XXG):Local Embassy
1026:Knowledge (XXG):Local Embassy
1017:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
873:16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
600:17:13, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
1056::) | Is this wrong? Contact
944:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
558:20:01, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
519:17:56, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
461:21:49, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
435:21:39, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
410:21:36, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
381:04:19, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
346:01:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
331:00:39, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
312:23:25, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
293:22:30, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
279:22:28, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
261:22:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
245:22:17, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
60:How to write a great article
1024:You have been removed from
964:Hello, Camr. Voting in the
891:Hello, Camr. Voting in the
859:and submit your choices on
690:Emmanuel Schools Foundation
613:Front for Victory talk page
219:09:01, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
104:20:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
1077:
1062:18:00, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
1009:MediaWiki message delivery
936:MediaWiki message delivery
865:MediaWiki message delivery
704:20:34, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
679:00:09, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
791:14:18, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
742:12:33, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
721:20:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
625:17:41, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
473:
207:Knowledge (XXG):Help desk
196:20:19, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
164:15:29, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
88:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
818:04:28, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
141:05:20, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
479:
976:Arbitration Committee
903:Arbitration Committee
837:Arbitration Committee
478:
18:User talk:Camilorojas
492:{{Resolved|1=~~~~}}
841:arbitration process
761:Scoobynaiterpaul123
211:Academic Challenger
992:arbitration policy
919:arbitration policy
853:arbitration policy
641:really does means
502:remove this notice
480:
158:
55:How to edit a page
38:your contributions
1028:due to inactivity
773:
759:comment added by
676:
509:
508:
493:
457:
451:
431:
425:
406:
400:
156:
139:
78:your messages on
32:Hello, Camr, and
16:(Redirected from
1068:
960:
887:
816:
804:
803:
772:
753:
677:
672:
666:
660:
654:
652:
649:works nicely. ~
539:
533:
516:
505:
491:
471:
455:
449:
445:
429:
423:
419:
404:
398:
394:
117:
93:
80:discussion pages
21:
1076:
1075:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1058:my bot operator
1030:
1021:
1020:
961:
953:
948:
947:
888:
880:
861:the voting page
827:
801:
798:
779:
754:
749:
729:
686:
670:
664:
658:
653:
650:
635:
632:Frisa aerospace
609:
565:
537:
531:
528:
512:
499:
469:
443:
417:
392:
388:
386:Rtitle on house
354:
226:
203:
171:
148:
111:
91:
65:Manual of Style
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1074:
1072:
1029:
1022:
999:the candidates
962:
955:
954:
952:
949:
926:the candidates
889:
882:
881:
879:
876:
830:
826:
821:
797:
794:
778:
775:
748:
745:
728:
725:
724:
723:
685:
682:
634:
628:
608:
605:
564:
561:
527:
522:
507:
506:
496:
495:
481:
468:
465:
464:
463:
444:Andrewcrawford
438:
437:
418:Andrewcrawford
393:Andrewcrawford
387:
384:
353:
350:
349:
348:
333:
314:
295:
281:
263:
225:
222:
202:
199:
186:Best regards,
170:
167:
147:
144:
110:
107:
68:
67:
62:
57:
52:
47:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1073:
1064:
1063:
1060:. | Sent at
1059:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1045:
1040:
1038:
1034:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1005:
1000:
995:
993:
989:
985:
981:
977:
972:
969:
968:
959:
950:
946:
945:
941:
937:
933:
932:
927:
922:
920:
916:
912:
908:
904:
899:
896:
895:
886:
877:
875:
874:
870:
866:
862:
858:
854:
850:
846:
842:
838:
834:
825:
822:
820:
819:
814:
809:. Thanks. —
808:
796:Quixotic plea
795:
793:
792:
788:
784:
776:
774:
770:
766:
762:
758:
746:
744:
743:
739:
735:
726:
722:
719:
716:
712:
708:
707:
706:
705:
702:
699:
695:
691:
683:
681:
680:
675:
673:
667:
661:
648:
644:
640:
633:
629:
627:
626:
622:
618:
614:
607:Socialist tag
606:
604:
601:
597:
593:
592:Martin Hausen
589:
585:
581:
580:Martin Hausen
577:
573:
569:
568:Martin Hausen
562:
560:
559:
555:
551:
550:Fribbulus Xax
547:
543:
536:
526:
523:
521:
520:
517:
515:
503:
498:
497:
489:
487:
482:
477:
472:
466:
462:
458:
452:
446:
440:
439:
436:
432:
426:
420:
414:
413:
412:
411:
407:
401:
395:
385:
383:
382:
378:
374:
368:
364:
358:
351:
347:
343:
339:
334:
332:
328:
324:
320:
315:
313:
309:
305:
301:
296:
294:
290:
286:
282:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
262:
258:
254:
249:
248:
247:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
223:
221:
220:
216:
212:
208:
200:
198:
197:
193:
189:
184:
183:
179:
174:
168:
166:
165:
162:
159:
153:
145:
143:
142:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
116:
108:
106:
105:
101:
97:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
66:
63:
61:
58:
56:
53:
51:
48:
46:
43:
42:
41:
39:
35:
30:
29:
19:
1049:
1048:
1041:
1032:
1031:
1002:
996:
973:
965:
963:
929:
923:
900:
892:
890:
828:
813:Technical 13
799:
780:
755:— Preceding
750:
747:Ricardo Fort
730:
687:
655:
642:
636:
610:
566:
529:
513:
510:
483:
389:
369:
365:
359:
355:
318:
266:
232:
227:
204:
185:
175:
172:
149:
115:TonyTheTiger
112:
69:
31:
27:
26:
1004:voting page
931:voting page
727:Jumbohostel
630:CSD nom of
548:. Cheers,
352:Explanation
82:using four
1050:Thank you!
988:topic bans
915:topic bans
849:topic bans
694:Luis Palau
637:Just FYI,
132:WP:CHICAGO
96:Kingturtle
92:{{helpme}}
72:Wikipedian
1054:Yapperbot
984:site bans
911:site bans
845:site bans
715:Fayenatic
698:Fayenatic
647:WP:CSD#A3
639:WP:CSD#G1
525:Wernffrwd
467:Heads up!
373:ThaddeusB
338:Joe Chill
323:Joe Chill
304:Joe Chill
285:Joe Chill
271:Joe Chill
253:Joe Chill
237:Joe Chill
229:WP:PERNOM
74:! Please
1033:Hi Camr!
769:contribs
757:unsigned
643:nonsense
514:Excirial
500:You can
235:a rule.
201:response
173:Hello,
50:Tutorial
28:Welcome!
783:DCGeist
734:Mjroots
692:and to
456:contrib
430:contrib
405:contrib
182:Commons
136:WP:LOTM
34:welcome
835:. The
718:(talk)
701:(talk)
224:PERNOM
188:Abigor
169:Answer
157:Miacek
84:tildes
777:Or...
651:Amory
617:TIAYN
535:db-g1
1013:talk
974:The
940:talk
901:The
869:talk
811:{{U|
787:talk
765:talk
738:talk
621:talk
615:. --
596:talk
584:talk
572:talk
554:talk
450:talk
424:talk
399:talk
377:talk
342:talk
327:talk
308:talk
300:WP:N
289:talk
275:talk
257:talk
241:talk
215:talk
192:talk
178:here
152:here
100:talk
76:sign
829:Hi,
815:}}
563:IPA
546:AfD
361:-->
233:not
180:on
161:(t)
128:bio
109:AfD
1046:.
1015:)
1007:.
986:,
942:)
934:.
913:,
871:)
847:,
789:)
771:)
767:•
740:)
668:•
662:•
623:)
598:)
556:)
538:}}
532:{{
459:)
453:-
433:)
427:-
408:)
402:-
379:)
344:)
329:)
319:do
310:)
291:)
277:)
259:)
243:)
217:)
209:.
194:)
138:)
102:)
1011:(
938:(
867:(
785:(
763:(
736:(
674:)
671:c
665:t
659:u
656:(
619:(
594:(
582:(
570:(
552:(
488:.
447:(
421:(
396:(
375:(
340:(
325:(
306:(
287:(
273:(
267:I
255:(
239:(
213:(
190:(
134:/
130:/
126:/
124:c
122:/
120:t
118:(
98:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.