User talk:Camptown - Knowledge (XXG)

4336: 2083: 2954: 2819: 1791: 22: 5421: 5260: 3100: 5020: 4699: 4239: 3594: 3192: 3065: 2726: 2521: 2464: 2402: 2345: 2200: 2132: 1995: 1900: 1735: 1540: 1076: 984: 924: 867: 811: 719: 649: 595: 520: 384: 319: 223: 152: 88: 5214: 5181: 4448: 4800: 4573: 4295: 5074: 4898: 5039:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 3902:, you are now only allowed to make two reversions to an article within a 24 hour period before having to stop. I'm hoping to have you and the other editor in question stop pushing back in forth; instead, please use this time to develop consensus on issues you disagree on. Thanks, and please reply on my talk page so I can be sure you've received this. 5365: 5142: 3376:

advocated the Kosovo national site, then bordering country would be Kosovo. If you are on the Serbian national site, then the neighboring country would be Albania. Listing both countries is geographically impossible. And about the controversy itself: Let's just wait for some time. Anything else is a waste of energy.

4133:

Images with correct fair-use rationales and licenses are to be left alone, not to be replaced with images of poorer quality and incorrect fair-use rationales. Please keep that in mind next time. Only upload images which will contribute to the encyclopedia better, not just so you can have your name in

3728:

yeah, I see you prefer communicating by template messages. I don't know what to say, you insist in blatant violation of NPOV, and call me "POV-pushing". Are you a politician or something? I am not interested in this sort of exchange. Just know that edit-warring will not yield the revision you desire,

3475:

very well be interesting and noteworthy enough from the perspective of the recent development. To me, the American warning of retaliation should the Serbs not take adecvate action to protect the U.S. embassy seems noteworthy enough, and it doesn't seem fair just to delete it right away, especially as

4214:

doing that menial work! :) But, the archives that you created are pretty small (under 75k) and this means that within a year, there will be an insane number of archives. I suggest making the archives bigger instead of breaking them up into chunks, meaning generally 100+ discussions per archive page.

5090:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original

4914:

1355:

Thanks for looking into this matter. Since you were the person who originally uploaded this file from it.wikipedia, I think you are the best person to contact HumanBehavior at flickr about releasing this work under a free license. I am a newcomer to Knowledge (XXG) and wouldn't know how to go about

1137:

for deletion for not being notable, because he couldn't find English-language sources on it. Of course, all the votes on it are keep, so it may not be open much longer. I am alerting you as you are one of the major contributors to the article, so you can leave any additional comments or claims of

4175:

I removed this for three reasons: NPOV, Notability, and hersay. Its propaganda, and from China Daily. I would be extremely supprised if *any* other news agency would carry it, without citing the controversial nature. I will not revert, if you revert the deletion. Better to put it in the article on

3435:

My full explanation of my edits: The first thing about Putin saying something is interesting and all, but it is hardly a noteworthy news event as is the US’s reaction to its embassy being attack. Both statements simply reiterate established opinions voiced many times before. As for Peru, it’s no

1445:

sometimes puts it), why don't you ask the Nobel Foundation in Stockholm to stop sponsoring the prize, which is the case as the foundation indeed issues the diploma, organizes the Nobel lectures, awards the medal, and hands over the prize cheque (from the Swedish Central Bank - a bank btw which has

4353:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient

1334:

Regarding image Michelangelo Antonioni..This image was originally uploaded from it.wikpedia. That person uploaded the image from flickr. On both flickr and it.wikpedia, the license attached to the image clearly states that it is non-commercial.... however, now that the image is on wikipedia, the

3162:

Have you participated in the discussion to be able with all asureances state that no compromise had not been reached. Why have you changed something that you are not even interested to discuss. What I can presume is that you are not doing this for the goodness of your heart but for other still

3375:

Sorry, I am a bit puzzled. Is this still a reply to my statement? If so, let me clarify: I did not want to take any stance in this quarrel about the status of Kosovo. I just tried to explain that from any point of view Serbia cannot border Kosovo and Albania together. More explicitly: If you

1686:

The thing is that the issue is under continious review (and broad majority has repeatedly found the short form correct), but for some reason, these two editors (possibly the same person) are again forcefully and with bad faith trying to change the established short form of the Nobel Prize in

3318:

Your edit on the Serbia site lacks consistency. You added Kosovo as a neighbor, but did not remove Albania. I do not want to indulge in the ongoing lengthly discussion about the status of Kosovo. However, independent from this question, looking at the map it is clear that Serbia cannot have

1858:

Sorry, forgot to copy that over. Principle behind it though was that we really shouldn't start off by saying it is changing, more explain what it all does before go into a treaty what may not even come into force. Hence it being at the bottom of that section and also in future. -

1042:

Hi, thanks for the nom, I hope it makes it onto the front page. Incidentally, I've always understood it to be 'British Somaliland', or 'the British Somaliland protectorate'. Did you have a particular reason for using '...the British Somaliland'? Or am I ok to change it?

3692:. You are clearly violating Knowledge (XXG) core policy, and making it worse by pushing your violations by edit-warring. Knowledge (XXG) is not built for behaviour like this, and our only solution for people who insist regardless of warnings and admonitions is 4309:

because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Knowledge (XXG) (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its

1345:

Licenses with NC (non-commercial use only) are not OK here. As the image is not OK, consider asking the author to release the work under a free license such as CC-BY (Creative Commons Attribution license) or CC-BY-SA (Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike).

1441:. So far, a broad majority obviously finds the short form correct enough, but if you initiate another vote, you might get a different result. Furthermore, if you find the term "Nobel Prize in Economics" so offending and incorrect (or a "lye" and a hoax as 3605:

prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the

3498:

You need to watch some of your edit summaries and rv's yourself too, friend. I've blocked the other editor that you reported for 24 hours. Try and discuss with him from now on please. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.

3163:

unexplained reasons. I think that it is most probably the time (which has grown to a boiling point) and that Duje and others like him had drawn ranks and find ample associates for the project of destruction of the compromise that had been reached.

4725:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

4215:

I've setup automatic archiving on the talk page, however, and so a bot will archive the page once a day automatically so that every archive page is at most 250k. I'm just giving you a heads up so you don't have to do that anymore. Cheers!

1708:

As I've said to Liftarn, the correct procedure therefore is to protect the page until consensus is reached through discussion. A protracted, long-past 3RR revert war will just get everyone blocked, which is hardly an optimal solution.

4207: 4200: 3295:

kun üstünlüğü ile evrensel insan hakları, demokrasi ve çoğulcu değerlerin geliştirilmesi gerektiğine inanmaktadır. Türkiye, Kosova ile komşuları arasında karşılıklı güven ve işbirliği ortamının yaratılmasının zaruret teşkil

4057:

We have finally got a working NPOV intro done on the Kosovo article, if you have further suggestions please make them regarding the intro. I'd like to discuss the info boxes now and would appreciate your comments. Thanks.

4764:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

4667: 4729:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

3492: 575:

Hello, thank you for information. I added some inline citations, hope it will be enough for such small article. Also, maybe you would like to think some new hook for DYK as proposed to some looks too simple. Cheers,

1388:

There is no such consensus about using the name "Nobel Prize in Economics" in all articles that include some statement about the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel. All comments in

4014:

Hey, I think you may have got the wrong idea about the Main Page talk page. It's not somewhere for general announcements, it is like any other talk page- to discuss improvements to the corresponding non-talk page.

1335:

attached license permits commercial use....is this a mistake. The reason for my concern.I would like to use this image in a book I'm writing, and I need to know if commercial use of this image is allowed Thanks, --

1446:

never been called "Bank of Sweden"). Of course the prize might be called the "Sveriges Riksbank's Prize in Economic Sciences", but again, the community does not, for a number of reasons, share that opinion. What

4978:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 3352:

the breakaway province of Kosovo, this way you are making a presumption about the final decision on the status of Kosovo. And, by the words of one Eric Cartman: "This is not over. Oh no, not by a long shot."

1450:

is doing is plain vandalism, as he/she on a continuous basis and rather violently pushes for the long form in violation to the consensual votes. As regards the use of long or short name, I understand that

3476:

the item as been further edited by other wp users whose competens I wouldn't question. However, I'll give you the last word and will not further revert your revisions regarding the items in question. --

4592:

unnecessary disamb page, since it only covers two articles that already link to each other, plus it should really be at Svenska Akademien (disambiguation) since that is the name of the band mentioned.

1845:

I didn't, it is still in the main body and I also copied it under future. Source is also still there but I put it into a template and also kept the older source as that had background information. -

3436:

big deal that another country recognized Kosovo’s independence. Sixteen other counties have already done so and just because it’s the first one from South America does not make it extraordinary. –

1516:

illegal way. For years now, especially nowadays that the new Constitution is being drafted, experts and politicians are discussing whether or not it should be legalized. The main reason why article

3265: