Knowledge

User talk:Caleb Stanford/Archive 2

Source 📝

977:(keeping FP and OOP at top), but I'd like to get some input from others first, particularly those outside of theory/PL. I totally agree that the quality of an article should not drive its assessment. I think there are certainly other articles that could bump down, but it's hard to say which without making it a political decision about which fields of CS are most important... for example, before I edited the list, it was very heavily theory, databases, PL, and cryptography focused, and there were no articles in many areas of systems and AI. 2061: 2424: 1672: 2245: 1922: 2193: 1613: 1376: 2303: 1562: 497: 2400:. I saw that you have an interest in computer security and was hoping you might be willing to review my comments and make any appropriate changes. Since I have a conflict of interest, I shouldn’t be editing any of these controversies/criticisms myself, but I can answer questions, do legwork, or provide any assistance. Thanks 2477:. I've been following up for months and got plenty of support from impartial editors (I think), but the page still has 30+ sections on individual products. I was wondering if you would be willing to take a look and see if you agree RE slimming it down? Let me know if there is any way I can be more helpful. Best regards. 638: 754:
Likewise, thank you for your work! Two things that stand out to me right now are the History section, which feels like it needs expansion and is not comprehensive, and the Performance section, which is important but a stub, and needs at least 2-3 paragraphs. In general, I think GA nomination would be
854:
I disagree with this relative assessment: semantics is more important than what is normally meant by type systems (i.e. an effective assignment of types to values or expressions), and the application of type theory to computer science is generally done within semantics. If you look at the history of
944:
Before bumping down core ideas in programming like FP and OO I'd take a look at the amount of internet, AI, security, and trendy technologies listed there. Evaluation strategy isn't top importance, but neither IMO is Augmented reality. The exact count of articles in the category might be inflated
901:
down to high. One problem with the Semantics article is that it's less directly applicable to your average computer scientist or practitioner than type systems and programming paradigms. In other words, semantics as a topic of study is really specific to programming language theorists (even though
936:
As someone more interested in history and theory than modern trends, a definite yes in my opinion to your first question. But I don't know that I am the person you want to ask: to give bearings, I'd rate Fortran and Algol higher than C++, Java, Javascript and Python, but that shows how I am less
945:
because of closely related concepts getting individual articles: we have Computer science, Computational science, Computer engineering, Information science, and Theoretical computer science, all of which are demarcations of the study of computing with nebulous boundaries and lots of overlap. —
789:
I should add that I don't know if those count as blockers, though -- I don't have prior experience with the GA nomination process and what standards are expected before a first nomination. I have previously only tried peer review which seems to suffer from poor availability of reviewers.
1111:
In January 1968 Chris Squire put together a new band called Mabel Greer's Toyshop. Says Peter, "I think he was going to call the band Yes instead of Mabel Greer's Toyshop. And I said he couldn't do that because it was my idea. I had thought of the name Yes a couple of years
940:
The semantics article is not in a great state, but I don't think that should drive assessments: the point is not to showcase our best material, but to identify topics we are failing to do justice to. Few of the Vital 100 articles are decent, let alone have passed GA or FA
667:
Hey, just letting you know that I reverted your revert of my replacing the short description here with None. In general, that's the accepted form for any article where the title is sufficiently descriptive that the short description doesn't help disambiguate it. See
892:
I've been pruning it down, and not sure which PL-related articles to include on the list. If there is a consensus, I might be happy with including all three of semantics, type systems, and type theory and bumping a couple of the other articles like
1071:
Hello there! Thanks for the prompt revert on the Yes article, but Squire wasn't an original member of Mabel Greer. The group's own article indicates that first line-up was Bayley, Hagger, and Rutledge. Squire and Banks joined the group later on.
1087:
Thanks. Did you check the reference? It says Squire formed it in January 1968. So not sure how to resolve this inconsistency. I could look a bit more into the source if I obtain a real copy, I was working on excerpts provided by Google Books...
1515:
I also prefer 3 the most, followed by 1, then 2. But I think I value consistency across articles over this particular choice. Is there a reason 1 is used on all the other articles? I don't suppose there's some published standard for this?
2473:. The current IdeaPad page has about 30+ sections and sub-sections about individual products. A lot of the information is out-dated, incomplete, etc. I was hoping to replace it with a single product table, similar to what is currently 1287:
I did like mentioning something about this and was sorry to see it go. If I have a chance I'll loop back to this and see if some textbooks reference it. I only quickly scanned, but didn't find a discussion on reordering fields at
660: 2150: 1151:
I have subsequently made significant improvements and now I kindly ask that after reviewing this discussion that you might render your opinion. I posted a request on the AfC help page on 28 June, but I have had no reply.
2330:" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. ( 1263:" Rust ordering for improved performance is definitely a "thing" and dramatically improves performance over C/C++ in many cases because of this feature of the language. This example would probably be considered 1894:
Well, thanks, but this is not content I created, but content moved from another page where it didn't fit. I will simply move the content to another page instead. Unreferenced is not the same as not verifiable
2035:
Thanks for the positive sentiment! I don't think I have time to tackle these other articles at the moment, but I hope someone does -- this seems like a space where a lot more names deserve their own article.
1199:
Yes, I added 5 more references. Numbers 2 & 6 were the only references when I first submitted it. I have tried to find an AfC reviewer with newspaper experience but the only one that I could find is
2019:
that you might have the sources to help bring back into article space? (That's only about half of the designers pages I know of that have been deleted/redirected, if you really want a project to tackle.)
2142: 937:
interested in what is "directly applicable to your average computer scientist or practitioner" than the people who generally do these assessments. I'd certainly rate Tony Hoare higher than Hoare logic.
1981: 1204:, and he has not been online since April. I don't see that Idoghor has any more experience with newspaper articles than you. What is the process if I resubmit it? Will Idoghor be the reviewer? 527: 2118: 2146: 1036:
I did not know Buie, but have done a major copy edit for improvements on his article. I renominated it GAN. My job there was an an electronics technician. Made really good money.--
2438: 1167:
Hi BuffaloBob, it looks reasonable to me but I'm afraid I have no expertise in the area. Maybe ask someone who has written/reviewed other newspaper Wiki pages? Best regards,
1984:
after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
2138: 2122: 884: 2396:, a password management tool. I have disclosed my affiliation with LastPass and requested impartial editors review what I see as major neutrality and citation issues 1742:
I'm not seeing how this would help. If they are appearing as the band then it can be listed at Yes discography for Other appearances. Same with the spinoff groups.
225: 2205: 1620:, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See 416: 804:
I've nominated it for review. I've read the policies in more detail and it looks to me that this is not simply a pass/fail but more like academic peer reviews.
641:
on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers,
629:
when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.
393: 294: 1965: 392: 293: 1746:
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with
1517: 1343: 317: 53: 1687:
within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.
1051:
Thanks for your message. That's very cool! :) I think the article is in better shape after your thorough edit pass. Best of luck with further edits.
1929: 2327: 1494:
Personally I like the third best, followed by the second. The rectangles in the first are very annoying, but this style seems to be most common (
2216: 49: 2158: 650: 2443: 1679:
for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a
1666: 1607: 1183:
P. S. Did you add the current references after the submission was declined? I see it now has 7, not sure how many there were before.
1866:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Knowledge's 519: 2266:
In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
510:
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
1387:
and I realized there's some disagreement over the best way to format standard functions. Which of these is most pleasing to you?
1006: 669: 2154: 1784: 1565:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
1306:
The playground link shows nothing because it does not include a gist parameter. What you saw when you clicked on that link was
646: 559: 538: 484: 1448:
that maps files or devices into memory. When no longer in use, memory-mapped pointers should be unmapped with munmap(2). Some
235: 902:
it's arguably the foundation of all of computer science). I think the article also just needs to be expanded and improved.
1282:
In the playground link, what does this show? I think you want to print the raw memory at THREE_AM to see what it contains.
523: 1009:. Per guidelines I have to notify you in your talk page, although I think you might have already seen it. Happy editing! 1763: 974: 880: 841: 555: 534: 503: 488: 141: 2319: 2295: 1344:
https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=release&edition=2018&gist=7f109748e08e73b5df140265852fe8ae
894: 720: 252: 170: 35: 1870:
and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
2451: 2260: 2238: 2197: 2185: 1985: 1971: 1831: 1823: 1684: 2432:
has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the
2200:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months 2433: 2355: 2173: 2098: 2041: 1904: 1812: 1525: 1333: 1297: 1260: 1239: 1188: 1172: 1124: 1093: 1077: 1056: 982: 927: 907: 825: 795: 760: 709: 581: 230: 84: 17: 2429: 2415: 1476:
that maps files or devices into memory. When no longer in use, memory-mapped pointers should be unmapped with
1412:
that maps files or devices into memory. When no longer in use, memory-mapped pointers should be unmapped with
2168:
It would be helpful if you could provide the specific article! I searched and searched and couldn't find it.
1731: 1721: 2405: 2315: 1968:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 1651: 1592: 1537: 1041: 1002: 554:
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
2270:, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can 898: 2447: 2436:
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
1934: 1140: 1946:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 1032: 2482: 2227: 2016: 1859: 1314: 1209: 1157: 1012: 807: 772: 733: 672:
for a brief conversation about this in the short description wikiproject. The genera guideline is at
613: 43: 34:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
2351: 2307: 2267: 2169: 2130: 2094: 2037: 2012: 1900: 1896: 1808: 1778: 1521: 1329: 1293: 1232: 1218: 1184: 1168: 1144: 1120: 1089: 1073: 1052: 978: 970: 923: 919: 903: 821: 791: 756: 705: 577: 463: 364: 80: 2274:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 726:
Thank you for the work on the article. Do you think there are any blockers for nominating it as a
2401: 2376: 1755: 1037: 683: 642: 634: 522:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 405: 306: 189: 183: 1143:, that I drafted and submitted for review in Articles for creation was declined by Afc reviewer 2271: 2365: 2080: 2060: 1997: 1703: 1640: 1581: 883:
one of the top 100-150 most important articles in computer science on Knowledge, as listed at
431: 332: 275: 206: 69: 2256: 2209: 2075:
Hello, I wish you the very best during the holidays. And I hope you have a very happy 2023!
1502: 952: 862: 701: 673: 623: 152: 121: 103: 2486: 2455: 2409: 2380: 2359: 2288: 2231: 2177: 2162: 2102: 2084: 2045: 2029: 2001: 1908: 1881: 1816: 1790: 1707: 1644: 1585: 1529: 1506: 1355: 1337: 1322: 1301: 1276: 1248: 1213: 1192: 1176: 1161: 1148: 1128: 1097: 1081: 1060: 1045: 1020: 986: 956: 931: 911: 866: 829: 815: 799: 780: 764: 741: 713: 687: 654: 585: 467: 368: 279: 241: 210: 156: 88: 73: 2478: 2223: 1804: 1676: 1621: 1556: 1224: 1205: 1201: 1153: 749: 217: 166:
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
1617: 1342:
ya. I mucked it up. Now I know about shared links. This is what I should have shared, "
46:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 2343: 1798: 1770: 1727: 1289: 599: 459: 360: 2397: 2372: 2252: 2201: 2134: 2114: 2025: 1889: 1871: 1867: 1735: 1351: 1272: 695: 677: 591: 453: 447: 354: 348: 113: 60:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
1149:
https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Idoghor_Melody/Archive_2#RE_Draft:Decatur_Tribune
120:
I'm thinking that bluelinks could be made in each of the award winner's articles to
2126: 2076: 1993: 1845: 1839: 1835: 1699: 1694: 1690: 1636: 1631: 1627: 1577: 1572: 1568: 1552: 1264: 879:
Thanks for your input. If I can ask for your further opinion: in your judgment, is
727: 271: 267: 202: 198: 65: 61: 1147:
on 6 June 2022. Idoghor suggested that I get a second opinion. See discussion at
436: 337: 1030:
I worked for TRW from 1965 to 1970. That's why I have pictures of the buildings.
851:
high (less important than type system and type theory IMO, both currently high'.
567: 1921: 1855: 1851: 1498: 1473: 1445: 1409: 946: 874: 856: 176: 148: 109: 1834:, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from 2342:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
1975: 1958: 1941: 1662: 1655: 1603: 1596: 1548: 1541: 228:
for this article! I wanted to let you know the split-merge has now been done.
2251:
Hello, Caleb Stanford. It has been over six months since you last edited the
2196:
Hello, Caleb Stanford. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
1456: 1430: 1392: 1261:
https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=release&edition=2018
533:
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
1229:
Only 2 sources were there when I declined, now it's 7, better than before.
1547:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
1310:
latest submission to playground, which has something to do with THREE_AM?
755:
great. Those are the two things I would personally try to get done first.
661:
National Register of Historic Places listings in Center City, Philadelphia
602:; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest. 2474: 2393: 2386: 2279: 2021: 1347: 1268: 39: 2192: 969:
Thanks, your perspective makes sense. I'd be on board with swapping out
606:
AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
537:
without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
2470: 260: 2466: 1482: 1449: 1418: 769:
Thanks for pointing these out. I will work on them when I have time.
256: 1803:
Thank you for the feedback -- I'll raise an issue for discussion at
496: 412:, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. 313:, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. 1683:
under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
566:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
1466: 1438: 1402: 2141:
for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found
2109:
Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
1267:
but if we can find a source that mentions it that would be good.
506:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 1470: 1442: 1406: 1384: 442: 343: 251:
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
2322:, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: 2137:
and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review
2277:
Thanks for your submission to Knowledge, and happy editing.
704:
so I learned something new! This policy makes perfect sense.
2243: 495: 2133:
and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent
544:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
410:
How to add an image to a BLP at the individual's request?
1850:
Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
2347: 2335: 2331: 2119:
Knowledge:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315
1495: 848: 633:
Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at
568: 547: 421: 322: 255:, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 38:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 450:. You can opt out of future notifications by placing 351:. You can opt out of future notifications by placing 1964:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
598:
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our
133: 129: 2113:You are receiving this message because you were a 1380:Hope your assistant professorship is going well. 458:on top of the current page (your user talk page). 359:on top of the current page (your user talk page). 2139:Knowledge:Good article reassessment/February 2023 128:To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with 700:Thank you for the message -- I was not aware of 162:Disambiguation link notification for November 15 2371:A new article you might have improvements for? 2149:. You can opt in or out of further messages at 1740: 1734:as having some issues to fix, as a part of our 1109: 619:has been created - this template is similar to 420: 321: 118: 95:I have sent you a note about a page you started 30:Disambiguation link notification for November 8 2215:If the page has already been deleted, you can 2125:closed with consensus to delist this group of 855:the discipline, I think this becomes clear. — 526:over time. You may like to take a look at the 247:Disambiguation link notification for January 3 2015:into an article. Do you see anything else at 1754:. For broader editing help, please visit the 112:, while examining this page as a part of our 8: 2222:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge. 2204:, so if you wish to retain the page, please 1966:Template:Did you know nominations/Yes (band) 1007:Talk:Rust (programming language)#Name origin 1518:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Computer science 850:with the comment 'bump importance top-: --> 419:. If you have follow-up questions, please 320:. If you have follow-up questions, please 132:. Please remember to sign your reply with 1938:was updated with a fact from the article 440:, and this notification was delivered by 341:, and this notification was delivered by 311:Placing external links before references? 2117:on at least one article that is part of 1858:on Knowledge). I've moved your draft to 1624:for issues which need to be addressed. 530:to see how you can improve the article. 224:Hi, and thanks for participating in the 2145:. Questions or comments can be made at 1713:Ways to improve List of Yes appearances 1616:. The article is close to meeting the 918:Another candidate for bumping down is 409: 310: 2461:Help making edits to the IdeaPad page 1452:implementations use mmap internally. 432:help page about the archival process. 333:help page about the archival process. 7: 2212:that it be moved to your userspace. 1373: 1328:Ah of course, that explains it. LOL 2219:so you can continue working on it. 1750:. Remember to sign your reply with 2121:or you signed up for messages. An 1368:Formatting function names sensibly 24: 1830:An article you recently created, 575:Thanks again, and happy editing! 514:The article has been assessed as 144:tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) 2422: 2301: 2191: 2059: 1948:... that given a choice between 1920: 1766:tool, on behalf of the reviewer. 1670: 1611: 1560: 1374: 404:! The thread you created at the 391: 305:! The thread you created at the 292: 2418:has been nominated for deletion 1980:, and the hook may be added to 1119:May be an error in the source? 2318:performed by you, on the page 1530:08:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC) 1520:would be a good place to ask. 1507:04:11, 28 September 2022 (UTC) 116:, had the following comments: 1: 2239:Draft:List of Yes appearances 2198:Draft:List of Yes appearances 2186:Draft:List of Yes appearances 2103:06:02, 26 December 2022 (UTC) 2093:Thank you! Happy holidays :) 2085:01:59, 26 December 2022 (UTC) 2046:02:15, 30 November 2022 (UTC) 2030:01:22, 30 November 2022 (UTC) 2002:00:03, 26 November 2022 (UTC) 847:You reduced from top to high 714:18:49, 22 February 2022 (UTC) 688:16:59, 22 February 2022 (UTC) 655:15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC) 586:19:12, 13 February 2022 (UTC) 558:without posting a request to 384:Your thread has been archived 285:Your thread has been archived 242:18:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC) 211:05:55, 15 November 2021 (UTC) 2178:16:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC) 2163:09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC) 1909:20:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC) 1882:11:57, 20 October 2022 (UTC) 1868:general notability guideline 1817:20:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC) 1791:20:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC) 1708:21:41, 14 October 2022 (UTC) 1645:12:20, 10 October 2022 (UTC) 975:Semantics (computer science) 881:Semantics (computer science) 842:Semantics (computer science) 504:Pairwise Compatibility Graph 489:Pairwise Compatibility Graph 468:19:04, 8 February 2022 (UTC) 417:read the archived discussion 318:read the archived discussion 157:14:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC) 124:to improve its reachability! 89:06:36, 8 November 2021 (UTC) 74:05:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC) 2487:15:09, 24 August 2023 (UTC) 2320:Rust (programming language) 2296:Rust (programming language) 1586:00:01, 7 October 2022 (UTC) 895:Object-oriented programming 721:Rust (programming language) 518:, which is recorded on its 369:19:03, 5 January 2022 (UTC) 280:05:59, 3 January 2022 (UTC) 253:Rust (programming language) 171:Constant-recursive sequence 140:(Message delivered via the 36:Constant-recursive sequence 2502: 2456:00:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC) 2289:21:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC) 2232:21:02, 22 March 2023 (UTC) 2155:MediaWiki message delivery 1033:They were new at the time. 997:Third opinion notification 647:MediaWiki message delivery 389: 290: 2444:categories for discussion 2410:19:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC) 2135:Good article reassessment 2065: 2058: 1555:-status according to the 1356:03:39, 13 July 2022 (UTC) 1338:14:35, 12 July 2022 (UTC) 1323:07:04, 12 July 2022 (UTC) 1302:20:01, 11 July 2022 (UTC) 1277:19:47, 11 July 2022 (UTC) 1129:20:38, 29 June 2022 (UTC) 1098:20:25, 29 June 2022 (UTC) 1082:18:45, 29 June 2022 (UTC) 1061:22:16, 26 June 2022 (UTC) 1046:21:37, 26 June 2022 (UTC) 1021:23:06, 22 June 2022 (UTC) 987:23:16, 21 June 2022 (UTC) 957:19:30, 21 June 2022 (UTC) 932:18:09, 21 June 2022 (UTC) 912:18:06, 21 June 2022 (UTC) 867:07:37, 21 June 2022 (UTC) 830:15:06, 25 June 2022 (UTC) 820:OK, sounds good. Thanks. 816:14:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC) 800:04:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC) 781:06:02, 13 June 2022 (UTC) 765:04:23, 13 June 2022 (UTC) 742:04:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC) 434:The archival was done by 335:The archival was done by 188:added a link pointing to 175:added a link pointing to 2430:Category:Gödel Lecturers 2416:Category:Gödel Lecturers 2381:17:26, 13 May 2023 (UTC) 2360:16:56, 13 May 2023 (UTC) 2348:report it to my operator 1717:Hello, Caleb Stanford, 1610:has been placed on hold 1497:for example). Thoughts? 1249:11:03, 6 July 2022 (UTC) 1214:01:56, 6 July 2022 (UTC) 1193:23:56, 5 July 2022 (UTC) 1177:23:55, 5 July 2022 (UTC) 1162:23:15, 5 July 2022 (UTC) 569:leaving us some feedback 556:create articles yourself 535:create articles yourself 220:-- Thanks for your input 18:User talk:Caleb Stanford 2261:List of Yes appearances 2217:request it be undeleted 1832:List of Yes appearances 1824:List of Yes appearances 1722:List of Yes appearances 1720:Thank you for creating 102:Thank you for creating 2469:, the manufacturer of 2312:automatically detected 2272:request its undeletion 2248: 1986:Did you know talk page 1744: 1492: 1114: 1104:Here's the full quote: 899:Functional programming 500: 437:Lowercase sigmabot III 338:Lowercase sigmabot III 126: 99:Hello, Caleb Stanford 2392:Hi Caleb. I work for 2253:Articles for Creation 2247: 2147:the project talk page 2115:Good article reviewer 2011:Good work on turning 1736:page curation process 1689:Message delivered by 1626:Message delivered by 1618:good article criteria 1567:Message delivered by 1389: 1141:Draft:Decatur Tribune 1001:I have requested for 560:Articles for creation 539:Articles for creation 499: 485:Articles for creation 114:page curation process 2475:on the ThinkPad page 2439:the category's entry 2237:Your draft article, 2017:User:BOZ/Draft pages 1486:implementations use 1422:implementations use 637:. Stop on by, maybe 268:Opt-out instructions 199:Opt-out instructions 62:opt-out instructions 2259:page you started, " 2013:Donald X. Vaccarino 1982:the statistics page 1862:(with a prefix of " 1840:independent sources 1826:moved to draftspace 1665:you nominated as a 1606:you nominated as a 1290:the page you linked 1234:Comr Melody Idoghor 1145:User:Idoghor Melody 1139:Caleb, an article, 971:Evaluation strategy 920:Evaluation strategy 483:Your submission at 422:create a new thread 323:create a new thread 2328:missing periodical 2249: 2184:Concern regarding 1915:DYK for Yes (band) 1856:central importance 1775: 1762:Delivered via the 1551:you nominated for 1135:AfC second opinion 501: 448:automated accounts 406:Knowledge:Teahouse 349:automated accounts 307:Knowledge:Teahouse 226:content discussion 190:Epsilon transition 184:Weighted automaton 52:‱ Join us at the 2446:page. Thank you. 2366:Stochastic parrot 2090: 2089: 1979: 1956:, the answer was 1849: 1771: 1767: 1697: 1634: 1575: 1255:Rust Optimization 955: 865: 663:short description 491:has been accepted 480: 479: 474: 470: 456:|deny=Muninnbot}} 381: 380: 375: 371: 357:|deny=Muninnbot}} 145: 57: 44:usually incorrect 42:. Such links are 2493: 2448:RevelationDirect 2426: 2425: 2305: 2304: 2287: 2246: 2195: 2063: 2056: 2055: 1969: 1930:26 November 2022 1924: 1893: 1878: 1875: 1865: 1843: 1802: 1787: 1781: 1774: 1761: 1753: 1749: 1748:{{Re|AngusWOOF}} 1688: 1674: 1673: 1625: 1615: 1614: 1566: 1564: 1563: 1489: 1485: 1479: 1463: 1425: 1421: 1415: 1399: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1325: 1321: 1319: 1246: 1235: 1228: 1019: 1017: 951: 878: 861: 814: 812: 779: 777: 753: 740: 738: 699: 680: 628: 622: 618: 612: 600:AFC participants 571: 563: 550: 473: 457: 445: 439: 429: 424: 395: 388: 387: 374: 358: 346: 340: 330: 325: 296: 289: 288: 238: 233: 139: 135: 131: 47: 2501: 2500: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2465:Hi. I work for 2463: 2427: 2423: 2420: 2390: 2369: 2302: 2299: 2278: 2244: 2242: 2189: 2111: 2054: 2009: 1991: 1990: 1925: 1917: 1887: 1876: 1873: 1863: 1828: 1805:Talk:Yes (band) 1796: 1785: 1779: 1772: 1751: 1747: 1738:and note that: 1715: 1693:, on behalf of 1677:Talk:Yes (band) 1671: 1659: 1630:, on behalf of 1622:Talk:Yes (band) 1612: 1600: 1571:, on behalf of 1561: 1545: 1487: 1481: 1477: 1461: 1423: 1417: 1413: 1397: 1383:Was working on 1375: 1370: 1315: 1312: 1311: 1257: 1240: 1233: 1222: 1202:User:Newslinger 1137: 1069: 1028: 1013: 1010: 999: 948:Charles Stewart 872: 858:Charles Stewart 845: 808: 805: 773: 770: 747: 734: 731: 724: 693: 678: 665: 626: 620: 616: 610: 596: 588: 553: 546: 542: 493: 476: 475: 451: 441: 435: 386: 377: 376: 352: 342: 336: 287: 249: 236: 231: 222: 218:History of Dell 164: 97: 79:Thanks Bot! :) 54:DPL WikiProject 32: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2499: 2497: 2462: 2459: 2434:categorization 2421: 2419: 2413: 2389: 2384: 2368: 2363: 2352:Qwerfjkl (bot) 2344:false positive 2340: 2339: 2308:Qwerfjkl (bot) 2298: 2292: 2255:submission or 2241: 2235: 2202:may be deleted 2188: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2170:Caleb Stanford 2110: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2095:Caleb Stanford 2088: 2087: 2072: 2071: 2069:Happy Holidays 2066: 2064: 2053: 2052:Happy Holidays 2050: 2049: 2048: 2038:Caleb Stanford 2008: 2005: 1926: 1919: 1918: 1916: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1901:Caleb Stanford 1827: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1809:Caleb Stanford 1714: 1711: 1658: 1654:nomination of 1648: 1599: 1595:nomination of 1589: 1544: 1540:nomination of 1534: 1533: 1532: 1522:Caleb Stanford 1513: 1512:Hi, thanks! :) 1369: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1330:Caleb Stanford 1294:Caleb Stanford 1284: 1283: 1256: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1219:Caleb Stanford 1216: 1196: 1195: 1185:Caleb Stanford 1180: 1179: 1169:Caleb Stanford 1136: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1121:Caleb Stanford 1116: 1115: 1106: 1105: 1101: 1100: 1090:Caleb Stanford 1074:LowSelfEstidle 1068: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1053:Caleb Stanford 1027: 1024: 998: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 979:Caleb Stanford 962: 961: 960: 959: 942: 938: 924:Caleb Stanford 915: 914: 904:Caleb Stanford 889: 888: 844: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 822:Caleb Stanford 792:Caleb Stanford 786: 785: 784: 783: 757:Caleb Stanford 723: 718: 717: 716: 706:Caleb Stanford 664: 658: 639:review a draft 631: 630: 607: 595: 589: 578:Caleb Stanford 541:if you prefer. 532: 528:grading scheme 511: 508: 494: 492: 481: 478: 477: 472: 428: 415:You can still 402:Caleb Stanford 398: 396: 385: 382: 379: 378: 373: 329: 316:You can still 303:Caleb Stanford 299: 297: 286: 283: 248: 245: 221: 214: 195: 194: 193: 192: 181: 180: 179: 163: 160: 96: 93: 92: 91: 81:Caleb Stanford 31: 28: 26: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2498: 2489: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2460: 2458: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2445: 2441: 2440: 2435: 2431: 2417: 2414: 2412: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2402:AmyMarchiando 2399: 2395: 2388: 2385: 2383: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2367: 2364: 2362: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2321: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2297: 2294:CS1 error on 2293: 2291: 2290: 2286: 2284: 2283: 2275: 2273: 2269: 2264: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2240: 2236: 2234: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2220: 2218: 2213: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2194: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2127:Good articles 2124: 2123:AN discussion 2120: 2116: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2091: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2073: 2070: 2067: 2062: 2057: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2018: 2014: 2006: 2004: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1989: 1987: 1983: 1977: 1973: 1967: 1963: 1961: 1960: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1937: 1936: 1931: 1923: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1891: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1880: 1879: 1869: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1852:verifiability 1847: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1825: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1800: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1788: 1782: 1776: 1768: 1765: 1764:Page Curation 1759: 1757: 1743: 1739: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1723: 1718: 1712: 1710: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1696: 1692: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1668: 1664: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1647: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1633: 1629: 1623: 1619: 1609: 1605: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1588: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1574: 1570: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1514: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1491: 1484: 1475: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1458: 1453: 1451: 1447: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1427: 1420: 1411: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1394: 1388: 1386: 1381: 1367: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1326: 1324: 1320: 1318: 1309: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1286: 1285: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1254: 1250: 1247: 1245: 1244: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1226: 1220: 1217: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1198: 1197: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1181: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1117: 1113: 1108: 1107: 1103: 1102: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1038:Doug Coldwell 1035: 1034: 1025: 1023: 1022: 1018: 1016: 1008: 1004: 1003:third opinion 996: 988: 984: 980: 976: 972: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 958: 954: 950: 949: 943: 939: 935: 934: 933: 929: 925: 921: 917: 916: 913: 909: 905: 900: 896: 891: 890: 886: 882: 876: 871: 870: 869: 868: 864: 860: 859: 852: 849: 843: 839: 831: 827: 823: 819: 818: 817: 813: 811: 803: 802: 801: 797: 793: 788: 787: 782: 778: 776: 768: 767: 766: 762: 758: 751: 746: 745: 744: 743: 739: 737: 729: 722: 719: 715: 711: 707: 703: 697: 692: 691: 690: 689: 685: 681: 675: 671: 662: 659: 657: 656: 652: 648: 644: 640: 636: 625: 615: 609:The template 608: 605: 604: 603: 601: 593: 590: 587: 583: 579: 576: 573: 570: 564: 561: 557: 551: 549: 540: 536: 531: 529: 525: 521: 517: 512: 507: 505: 498: 490: 486: 482: 471: 469: 465: 461: 455: 449: 444: 438: 433: 430:See also the 426: 423: 418: 413: 411: 407: 403: 397: 394: 390: 383: 372: 370: 366: 362: 356: 350: 345: 339: 334: 331:See also the 327: 324: 319: 314: 312: 308: 304: 298: 295: 291: 284: 282: 281: 277: 273: 269: 264: 262: 258: 254: 246: 244: 243: 240: 239: 234: 227: 219: 215: 213: 212: 208: 204: 200: 191: 187: 186: 185: 182: 178: 174: 173: 172: 169: 168: 167: 161: 159: 158: 154: 150: 146: 143: 142:Page Curation 137: 130:{{Re|Lovkal}} 125: 123: 122:Gödel Lecture 117: 115: 111: 107: 105: 104:Gödel Lecture 100: 94: 90: 86: 82: 78: 77: 76: 75: 71: 67: 63: 58: 55: 51: 45: 41: 37: 29: 27: 19: 2464: 2437: 2428: 2391: 2370: 2341: 2336:Ask for help 2311: 2300: 2281: 2280: 2276: 2265: 2250: 2221: 2214: 2190: 2112: 2068: 2010: 1992: 1957: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1940: 1939: 1935:Did you know 1933: 1927: 1897:WP:THENFIXIT 1872: 1829: 1769: 1760: 1745: 1741: 1730:have tagged 1726: 1719: 1716: 1680: 1667:good article 1661:The article 1660: 1608:good article 1602:The article 1601: 1546: 1493: 1490:internally. 1460: 1454: 1434: 1428: 1426:internally. 1396: 1390: 1382: 1371: 1316: 1307: 1258: 1242: 1241: 1231: 1230: 1138: 1110: 1070: 1031: 1029: 1014: 1000: 947: 857: 853: 846: 809: 774: 735: 725: 666: 632: 597: 574: 565: 545: 543: 515: 513: 509: 502: 427: 414: 401: 399: 328: 315: 302: 300: 265: 250: 229: 223: 196: 165: 147: 138: 127: 119: 108: 101: 98: 59: 33: 25: 2306:Hello, I'm 1773:AngusWđŸ¶đŸ¶F 1685:nominate it 1669:has passed 1474:system call 1469:-compliant 1446:system call 1441:-compliant 1410:system call 1405:-compliant 1112:beforehand. 614:db-afc-move 594:Helper News 516:Start-Class 237:Correlation 177:Closed form 110:User:Lovkal 2479:StuartGill 2350:. Thanks, 2346:, you can 2224:FireflyBot 1976:Yes (band) 1972:here's how 1942:Yes (band) 1860:draftspace 1663:Yes (band) 1656:Yes (band) 1604:Yes (band) 1597:Yes (band) 1549:Yes (band) 1542:Yes (band) 1372:Hi Caleb! 1225:BuffaloBob 1206:BuffaloBob 1154:BuffaloBob 750:0xDeadbeef 64:. Thanks, 48:(Read the 2316:this edit 2310:. I have 2268:mainspace 2208:again or 2151:this page 2131:copyright 2007:Nice work 1799:AngusWOOF 1681:bold link 1478:munmap(2) 1457:computing 1431:computing 1414:munmap(2) 1393:computing 885:this page 702:WP:SDNONE 674:WP:SDNONE 548:help desk 520:talk page 460:Muninnbot 443:Muninnbot 361:Muninnbot 344:Muninnbot 2394:LastPass 2387:LastPass 2373:Skyerise 1994:— Maile 1890:Onel5969 1836:reliable 1756:Teahouse 1732:the page 1557:criteria 1317:Deadbeef 1015:Deadbeef 840:Ranking 810:Deadbeef 775:Deadbeef 736:Deadbeef 696:Rusalkii 679:Rusalkii 643:Primefac 232:Spurious 40:Constant 2471:IdeaPad 2442:on the 2210:request 2206:edit it 2077:Bruxton 1700:Duonaut 1695:Duonaut 1691:Legobot 1637:Duonaut 1632:Duonaut 1628:Legobot 1578:Duonaut 1573:Duonaut 1569:Legobot 1480:. Some 1462:mmap(2) 1435:mmap(2) 1416:. Some 1398:mmap(2) 941:review. 624:db-move 524:develop 446:, both 347:, both 272:DPL bot 261:Haskell 203:DPL bot 66:DPL bot 2467:Lenovo 1864:Draft: 1854:is of 1675:; see 1499:Ovinus 1483:malloc 1450:malloc 1419:malloc 1243:(talk) 953:(talk) 875:Chalst 863:(talk) 645:, via 635:WT:AFC 592:WP:AFC 257:Erlang 149:lovkal 2314:that 2257:Draft 1954:World 1786:sniff 1650:Your 1591:Your 1536:Your 1467:POSIX 1465:is a 1439:POSIX 1437:is a 1403:POSIX 1401:is a 1265:WP:OR 1259:See " 728:WP:GA 270:.) -- 201:.) -- 16:< 2483:talk 2452:talk 2406:talk 2398:here 2377:talk 2356:talk 2263:". 2228:talk 2174:talk 2159:talk 2143:here 2129:for 2099:talk 2081:talk 2042:talk 2026:talk 1998:talk 1952:and 1950:Life 1905:talk 1877:5969 1874:Onel 1813:talk 1780:bark 1752:~~~~ 1704:talk 1641:talk 1582:talk 1526:talk 1503:talk 1488:mmap 1471:Unix 1443:Unix 1424:mmap 1407:Unix 1385:mmap 1352:talk 1334:talk 1308:your 1298:talk 1273:talk 1221:and 1210:talk 1189:talk 1173:talk 1158:talk 1125:talk 1094:talk 1078:talk 1057:talk 1042:talk 983:talk 973:for 928:talk 908:talk 897:and 826:talk 796:talk 761:talk 710:talk 684:talk 670:here 651:talk 582:talk 464:talk 454:bots 365:talk 355:bots 276:talk 259:and 216:Re: 207:talk 153:talk 134:~~~~ 85:talk 70:talk 2332:Fix 2326:A " 2153:. 2022:BOZ 1959:Yes 1928:On 1899:). 1724:. 1698:-- 1635:-- 1576:-- 1455:In 1429:In 1391:In 1348:War 1269:War 1067:Yes 1026:TRW 1005:at 400:Hi 301:Hi 263:. 50:FAQ 2485:) 2454:) 2408:) 2379:) 2358:) 2334:| 2285:iz 2230:) 2176:) 2161:) 2101:) 2083:) 2044:) 2028:) 2000:) 1988:. 1974:, 1932:, 1907:) 1842:. 1838:, 1815:) 1807:. 1789:) 1783:‱ 1758:. 1706:) 1652:GA 1643:) 1593:GA 1584:) 1559:. 1553:GA 1538:GA 1528:) 1505:) 1459:, 1433:, 1395:, 1354:) 1346:" 1336:) 1313:0x 1300:) 1292:. 1275:) 1212:) 1191:) 1175:) 1160:) 1127:) 1096:) 1080:) 1059:) 1044:) 1011:0x 985:) 930:) 922:. 910:) 828:) 806:0x 798:) 771:0x 763:) 732:0x 730:? 712:) 686:) 676:. 653:) 627:}} 621:{{ 617:}} 611:{{ 584:) 572:. 487:: 466:) 452:{{ 425:. 408:, 367:) 353:{{ 326:. 309:, 278:) 209:) 155:) 136:. 106:. 87:) 72:) 56:.) 2481:( 2450:( 2404:( 2375:( 2354:( 2338:) 2282:L 2226:( 2172:( 2157:( 2097:( 2079:( 2040:( 2024:( 1996:( 1978:) 1970:( 1962:? 1903:( 1895:( 1892:: 1888:@ 1848:) 1846:? 1844:( 1811:( 1801:: 1797:@ 1777:( 1728:I 1702:( 1639:( 1580:( 1524:( 1501:( 1350:( 1332:( 1296:( 1271:( 1227:: 1223:@ 1208:( 1187:( 1171:( 1156:( 1123:( 1092:( 1076:( 1055:( 1040:( 981:( 926:( 906:( 887:? 877:: 873:@ 824:( 794:( 759:( 752:: 748:@ 708:( 698:: 694:@ 682:( 649:( 580:( 562:. 552:. 462:( 363:( 274:( 266:( 205:( 197:( 151:( 83:( 68:(

Index

User talk:Caleb Stanford
Constant-recursive sequence
Constant
usually incorrect
FAQ
DPL WikiProject
opt-out instructions
DPL bot
talk
05:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Caleb Stanford
talk
06:36, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Gödel Lecture
User:Lovkal
page curation process
Gödel Lecture
Page Curation
lovkal
talk
14:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Constant-recursive sequence
Closed form
Weighted automaton
Epsilon transition
Opt-out instructions
DPL bot
talk
05:55, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
History of Dell

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑