195:
literary, institutional -- that Kass and I cultivated simply by virtue of moving from institution to institution, time zone to time zone, and plying our trade as writers and teachers, editors and publishers. Accordingly, your stipulations put the entire onus on you folks to know what that vast network comprises, and it won't be found simply in the pages of mainstream publications, b/c an important aspect of literary community consists of alliances among different coteries. I don't know how you intend to track citations down w/o my input, which of course includes the personal websites that I've assembled for Kass and me. There is a vast amount of verifiable information at those sites which, all told, I would contend speaks to notability. And believe me when I say, I do not have a big head about this. But after this many years on
Knowledge, I'd hate to see my entry and/or Kass's be expunged b/c you, understandably, don't have a good grasp of what I'm relating in this paragraph. You have uncontested Wiki pages for instance for Charles Bernstein, Michael Joyce, Marjorie Perloff, Andrei Codrescu, Steve Tomasula, and Johanna Drucker, all of whom have blurbed either Kass's books or mine or both. Naturally some of these people we count as dear friends. That's the way it works.
187:
it's difficult for me to chase down links for you, esp when they're already available at Kass's and my personal websites. For instance, you indicate now for Kass's years at ISU. But the About page at her website indicates exactly how long she taught there -- indeed I taught with her (I hope it's not a conflict of interest merely to say as much?) -- and there is a link there to the In
Memoriam page at ISU's Dept of English, where a photo of her with her title appears along with numerous others.
66:
25:
186:
Thanks for your response, albeit it has evidently resulted in questions raised now at Kass
Fleisher's Wiki page. While I understand entirely your conflict of interest guidelines, and I realize (as was explained to me when I first contacted the Wikimedia Response Team) that you folks are understaffed,
305:
Oh great, thanks Russ!! I’ll proceed as you suggest. I’ve occasionally corrected more obvious mistakes on random Wiki pages that I’ve simply stumbled across. The past couple of years have been rough though, for the obvious reasons. I’ll keep in mind what you say about pages adjacent to my expertise.
282:
The speedy deletion notice on the talk page is from 2011, and I'm fairly sure that it refers to an older picture. I'm not seeing any concerns about the current pic. Talk pages are a good place to put reviews and other links, and also other requests. I'll have them watch listed, and I suppose some
230:, but that is hard for someone who is closely involved. I fixed the citation needed tag, but adjusted the sentence to only give start date (which was easier to source). Some of the tags at the top should probably remain on the pages for the time being, but that does not necessarily mean forever.
190:
And btw: when Kass died, she was to be found nowhere at the dept website. They don't keep evidence of past faculty at ISU except in those cases where faculty are still somehow affiliated with the university. So I wrote to the dept chair spring of last year explaining that they needed an In
Memoriam
247:
Well I can over time try to round up more links -- to reviews of Kass's books, for instance. I'm just a little beleaguered of late b/c I'm trying to recover from major surgery. I must sound like a sad case! -- I'm doing much better at any rate. If I did round up more links, I'd want to be sure to
198:
Apologies for going on, but I feel I owe it to you to explain myself when I see what I regard as unreasonable expectations at work. Again, I appreciate all your efforts, or I wouldn't have again given a donation to
Knowledge for the third time this year. Rest assured I'm not presuming to "buy" an
194:
Neither do you. So I know you guys are doing your best. But when you include under conflict of interest "family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients or competitors," you might not realize that you thereby all but exhaust the decades' worth of alliances -- professional, personal,
191:
page, and not just for Kass. And they were good enough to put one up, with some assistance from yours truly. The point is that the dept page itself owes something to a conflict of interest. This is b/c ISU is not
Princeton, for instance, and does not have Princeton's resources.
291:. If you are interested and when you get more time, then you might consider doing some work on some pages that are adjacent to your expertise, but that are far enough away that you don't have a COI. It will give you some understanding, and I think you might rather enjoy it!
255:"Photo taken of the late Kass Fleisher by me, her partner and the executor of her estate, at a Christmas party held at her parents' home in West Chester, PA, in 2004. This photo also appears on the Celebration of Life program reproduced at her website."
222:, I am sorry for your loss. Your input is invited at the talk pages, but the COI guidelines discourage editing directly, except for a few very specific circumstances. Have you found the article talk pages? I can see that you've worked in
258:
There's no copyright violation possible here, as I have sole possession of all of her photographs, memorabilia, papers, book mss, etc, and am in fact in the process of archiving everything for eventual storage at her faculty
251:
Btw, I went to the Talk page for Kass's site and I see her photo/image file is marked for speedy deletion due to copyright violation. That can't be b/c, as I indicate at the
Wikimedia Commons site for the
164:'s terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See
45:
to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
262:
Anyway, I really appreciate your help. Let me know if, over time, I should send any additional links for Kass's or my Wiki sites to the respective talk pp.
40:
165:
149:
129:
88:
83:
36:
171:
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. –
74:
119:
296:
235:
81:(COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
199:
entry. But I believe it's important for you to recognize the issues you're creating for yourselves, as above.
32:
98:
articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
50:
288:
161:
78:
70:
292:
231:
176:
73:
your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
112:
46:
248:
submit them to the right place at Wiki. I assume that would be the Talk pages for each site?
105:
284:
227:
139:
223:
172:
306:
I just need some breathing space at this point. In any case thanks again! Best, Joe
307:
287:, but it's better to try the talk page first. For edit requests, you can also use
269:
219:
206:
65:
24:
315:
300:
277:
239:
214:
180:
54:
244:
Thanks so muçh, Russ, and for your condolences. Means much to me.
128:
your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see
23:
283:
other editors might also. Reviews _might_ fall under
138:
to your organization's website in other articles (see
130:
Knowledge:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI
20:File:Joe Amato 2010.jpg listed for discussion
8:
118:template)—don't forget to give details of
140:Knowledge:Spam § External link spamming
91:for more information. We ask that you:
166:Knowledge:Paid-contribution disclosure
108:of affected articles (you can use the
31:A file that you uploaded or altered,
7:
14:
64:
60:Managing a conflict of interest
316:23:33, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
301:22:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
278:22:13, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
240:21:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
215:18:34, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
181:16:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
84:conflict of interest guideline
37:Knowledge:Files for discussion
1:
77:on Knowledge, you may have a
122:supporting your suggestions;
148:to comply with Knowledge's
340:
96:avoid editing or creating
311:
273:
210:
89:FAQ for article subjects
226:, and tried to build a
55:16:58, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
33:File:Joe Amato 2010.jpg
75:you have written about
28:
289:template:edit request
156:In addition, you are
35:, has been listed at
27:
162:Wikimedia Foundation
79:conflict of interest
69:Hello, Capisce. We
29:
39:. Please see the
331:
150:content policies
120:reliable sources
117:
111:
68:
339:
338:
334:
333:
332:
330:
329:
328:
115:
109:
102:propose changes
62:
22:
12:
11:
5:
337:
335:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
293:Russ Woodroofe
266:
263:
260:
256:
253:
249:
245:
232:Russ Woodroofe
203:
200:
196:
192:
188:
154:
153:
143:
133:
123:
99:
61:
58:
21:
18:
16:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
336:
317:
313:
309:
304:
303:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
281:
280:
279:
275:
271:
267:
264:
261:
257:
254:
250:
246:
243:
242:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
218:
217:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
184:
183:
182:
178:
174:
169:
167:
163:
159:
151:
147:
144:
141:
137:
136:avoid linking
134:
131:
127:
124:
121:
114:
107:
103:
100:
97:
94:
93:
92:
90:
86:
85:
80:
76:
72:
67:
59:
57:
56:
52:
48:
44:
43:
38:
34:
26:
19:
17:
228:neutral page
170:
157:
155:
146:do your best
145:
135:
125:
101:
95:
82:
63:
47:Calliopejen1
41:
30:
15:
224:good faith
205:Joe Amato
202:Sincerely,
106:talk pages
42:discussion
259:archive.
173:notwally
158:required
126:disclose
113:edit COI
308:Capisce
285:WP:COIU
270:Capisce
220:Capisce
207:Capisce
160:by the
104:on the
71:welcome
252:photo:
265:Best,
312:talk
297:talk
274:talk
268:Joe
236:talk
211:talk
177:talk
87:and
51:talk
314:)
299:)
276:)
238:)
213:)
179:)
168:.
142:);
132:);
116:}}
110:{{
53:)
310:(
295:(
272:(
234:(
209:(
175:(
152:.
49:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
