172:
607:
578:. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --
78:
570:. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like
319:
yourself. The questions I asked about the case are ones I was wondering if people could answer through reliable sources. I was also asking what documents were available to the public to reference, because it is helpful to attach primary sources to the secondary sources which report on them. It allows secondary sources to be better read.
574:. For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current
307:
are not debate over a sexual detail, but rather, Emily's attributing a statement to Brock (him making a claim about the sexual detail) in her victim impact statement. Brock's own statement to the judge doesn't mention this. That Emily brought it up herself is what makes it seem acceptable to mention.
380:
Do you happen to know any other articles which mention an incline? Like someone other than Brock talking about it? Or maybe say how steep it was? I'm beginning to wonder if this detail even made it into the crime scene statements since it does seem like a subtle one that may not have been taken into
318:
are not proposing original research, but rather, the location of sources, which is not "original" research. Knowledge (XXG) editors finding sources is certainly describable as research but not 'original' since it is merely locating other people's research. Original research is making a source out of
331:
If a secondary source says "blood alcohol was xx% how is it original research to ask "does anyone know if it's been reported when the test was taken?" Organizing a collective search for the most accurate secondary sources and seeing if the underlying primaries are citeable or not does not seem like
264:
Thanks for turning up the FBI cite. I think there are still some ambiguities here, so I'm not sure I agree with your conclusions just yet but you brought up a good point. Please review my recent changes and my discussion of them and discuss on the talk page for the article if you have something to
376:
is the first instance I can recall reading about an incline in this case, previously I had instinctively just pictured the entire scene as a flat one. Whether or not and if so, to what degree, it was inclined, seems like an important detail to explore, since it could have affected the speed of
335:
What speculation about Emily Doe's consciousness are you talking about? I just want to report all the facts. For example that she opened her eyes when pinched, and the paramedic ranking her 11/15 on the
Glascow Coma Scale. This is reported by a secondary source here:
535:
Tomorrow's edit-a-thon at
Vanderbilt Library in Special Collections runs from 11AM to 4PM. The theme is "Nashville Architecture" and we're building on this year's list of the Nashville Nine (Most Endangered buildings). Lunch and how-to edit provided.
619:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before
Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
347:
I have read her entire statement multiple times, possibly more than you have. I am not victimizing her, and I am not mounting a defense, I am simply trying to keep the article neutral. Right now the BLP violations are against Brock not against
351:
I'd like if you could make a clearer argument as to how I'm violating BLP concerns because I don't really see it. Leaving out facts on the other hand, or taking a side in the case (even if it is the side of the jury) is not NPOV.
403:
In this case when I did include names, I considered them people to be directly involved in the article's topic. They were witnesses who offered testimony or police professionals who worked that case, that's clearly direct
279:
Regarding the vague warning you left on my talk page, I would like if you could elaborate via special:diff which edit you are talking about and what issue you have with it. Have I written anything offensive about Brock?
54:
PS: Sorry, I know this is tedious. I realize I may have bludgeoned the issue in the DRN. I will be doing my level-best to keep my comments to a minimum, and maybe that will lead to better progress this time around.
647:
343:
The external impetus is obvious: Brock is still claiming innocence and his lawyer has stated an intent to appeal the case, so it's not example a matter we can conveniently bury, we should strive to remain neutral
324:
We already include information about blood alcohol. The issue is obviously relevant, but even if we debated that, secondary sources report on the blood alcohol content, establishing that the issue is a notable
631:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
225:
202:
559:
396:
BLP policies remain increasingly in mind, particularly that it is required to abide by US law and neutrality/verifiability/NOR. I would like to use the talk page to discuss further about
575:
567:
407:
I didn't include any intentionally concealed names (the names which were not included in the complaint I didn't try to find) and the complaint has been widely disseminated.
116:
427:
Thank you for your expert contribution. I fear there are some who want to erase the history of this man's racist views. Please check back and keep up the good work.
328:
I am simply proposing we do what we can to find all the information reported in sources to give as much information as is acceptable about the blood alcohol content.
308:
I don't see how BLP protection for her applies here, she brings up this alleged orgasm-claim in her impact statement and this statement is referenced in our sources.
585:
135:
if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
340:
so I'll be adding it. This was the sort of thing I'm discussing: non-original research, ie the location of sources, not the manufacturing of sources.
571:
454:
I think you should just go ahead and edit the article. This one editor clearly has a personal bias which has no standing in
Knowledge (XXG).
661:
132:
540:
35:
on the Campus Sexual assault Talk page. The dispute was never really resolved, in part because of a lack of participation. I've posted
470:
443:
337:
563:
657:
640:
186:
511:
I'm trying to reach you to schedule a time to chat/interview for the VU EdTech
Podcast - LeadingLines; please let me know.
85:
652:
579:
190:
136:
122:
36:
32:
628:
544:
458:
431:
373:
315:
311:
304:
300:
247:
233:
215:
466:
439:
90:
102:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was
615:
597:
397:
377:
Brock's cadence. Stumbling down a ramp would be easier to mistake for running than crawling up one.
201:, for supporting projects such as anti-war and climate change, - user of many languages, you are an
270:
624:
332:
OR to me. OR is like "let's go break into the evidence locker and test it ourselves" or something.
518:
338:
http://www.stanforddaily.com/2016/03/21/brock-turner-trial-continues-in-second-week-of-testimony/
171:
494:
487:
243:
229:
211:
178:
148:
636:
462:
435:
60:
44:
17:
639:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
632:
412:
386:
357:
285:
198:
194:
106:
97:
266:
119:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page
514:
488:
Talk:James Watson#"Geographic ancestry" - is that like being descended from an atlas?
372:
Learning more one can always be lured into the wrong idea that one knows everything,
665:
591:
548:
522:
498:
474:
447:
416:
390:
361:
289:
274:
251:
237:
219:
152:
64:
48:
490:
257:
144:
606:
126:
77:
56:
40:
39:
that deals with the issue, and, if you have time comments would be appreciated!
408:
382:
353:
281:
177:
Thank you quality contributions for more than ten years to articles about
31:
Hey, I'm just dropping you a note because you previously participated in
643:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
113:
s 1484 books are the first publications known to be typeset by a woman?
182:
560:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Latin
America/The 10,000 Challenge
646:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
576:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Africa/The Africa
Destubathon
627:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
568:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge
115:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
562:has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland
117:Template:Did you know nominations/Anna Rügerin
400:and any other issues people want to bring up.
8:
295:Thank you for linking the diffs, addressing:
572:Knowledge (XXG):The 1000 Challenge (Nordic)
486:Your input would be greatly appreciated at
94:was updated with a fact from the article
554:Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite
185:and other groups facing bias, such as
7:
616:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
564:Knowledge (XXG):The 10,000 Challenge
629:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
224:A year ago, you were recipient no.
504:Interview for LeadingLines podcast
24:
605:
197:, for personal projects such as
170:
76:
228:of Precious, a prize of QAI! --
499:00:42, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
187:African Americans in Tennessee
1:
666:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
613:Hello, Carwil. Voting in the
592:00:29, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
549:22:34, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
523:14:41, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
65:18:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
49:18:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
27:RfC on Campus Sexual Assault
650:and submit your choices on
683:
658:MediaWiki message delivery
648:the candidates' statements
475:19:57, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
191:Sudanese refugees in Egypt
448:10:13, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
417:04:04, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
391:20:46, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
265:share about these edits.
131:, and it may be added to
362:03:04, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
290:01:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
275:03:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
252:09:31, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
238:07:42, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
220:06:36, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
153:00:02, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
260:Talk page contributions
581:Ser Amantio di Nicolao
374:special:diff/729611069
316:special:diff/728219251
312:special:diff/726759804
305:special:diff/725818752
301:special:diff/725763371
137:Did you know talk page
625:Arbitration Committee
598:ArbCom Elections 2016
71:DYK for Anna Rügerin
242:Three years now! --
133:the statistics page
641:arbitration policy
600:: Voting now open!
587:Lo dicono a Signa.
482:James Watson redux
203:awesome Wikipedian
165:groups facing bias
478:
461:comment added by
451:
434:comment added by
179:indigenous people
130:
674:
609:
582:
477:
455:
450:
428:
174:
120:
112:
80:
18:User talk:Carwil
682:
681:
677:
676:
675:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
653:the voting page
610:
602:
590:
580:
556:
530:
506:
484:
456:
429:
425:
370:
262:
208:
207:
199:Coca in Bolivia
175:
160:
142:
141:
110:
81:
73:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
680:
678:
611:
604:
603:
601:
595:
584:
555:
552:
529:
526:
505:
502:
483:
480:
424:
421:
420:
419:
405:
401:
369:
366:
365:
364:
349:
345:
341:
333:
329:
326:
321:
320:
309:
297:
296:
261:
255:
169:
167:
162:
161:
159:
156:
82:
75:
74:
72:
69:
68:
67:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
679:
668:
667:
663:
659:
655:
654:
649:
644:
642:
638:
634:
630:
626:
621:
618:
617:
608:
599:
596:
594:
593:
589:
588:
583:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
553:
551:
550:
546:
542:
541:129.59.122.20
537:
533:
527:
525:
524:
520:
516:
512:
509:
503:
501:
500:
496:
492:
489:
481:
479:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
452:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
399:
395:
394:
393:
392:
388:
384:
378:
375:
367:
363:
359:
355:
350:
346:
342:
339:
334:
330:
327:
323:
322:
317:
313:
310:
306:
302:
299:
298:
294:
293:
292:
291:
287:
283:
277:
276:
272:
268:
259:
256:
254:
253:
249:
245:
240:
239:
235:
231:
227:
222:
221:
217:
213:
206:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
173:
168:
166:
157:
155:
154:
150:
146:
140:
138:
134:
128:
124:
118:
114:
109:
108:
101:
100:
99:
93:
92:
87:
79:
70:
66:
62:
58:
53:
52:
51:
50:
46:
42:
38:
34:
26:
19:
651:
645:
622:
614:
612:
586:
557:
538:
534:
531:
528:October 2016
513:
510:
507:
485:
457:— Preceding
453:
430:— Preceding
426:
423:James Watson
404:involvement.
379:
371:
278:
263:
258:Brock Turner
244:Gerda Arendt
241:
230:Gerda Arendt
223:
212:Gerda Arendt
209:
195:Anna Rügerin
176:
164:
163:
143:
127:Anna Rügerin
107:Anna Rügerin
105:
103:
98:Anna Rügerin
96:
95:
91:Did you know
89:
83:
30:
532:Hi Carwil,
508:Hi Carwil,
463:Landerman56
436:Landerman56
86:27 May 2016
637:topic bans
539:Mary Anne
398:WP:BLPNAME
368:great find
123:here's how
633:site bans
267:Yakushima
104:... that
37:a new RfC
558:Hi. The
515:Jeeyen18
471:contribs
459:unsigned
444:contribs
432:unsigned
381:acount.
158:Precious
145:— Maile
33:this RfC
491:Joe Roe
57:Nblund
41:Nblund
409:Ranze
383:Ranze
354:Ranze
344:here.
282:Ranze
183:women
16:<
662:talk
623:The
566:and
545:talk
519:talk
495:talk
467:talk
440:talk
413:talk
387:talk
358:talk
348:her.
325:one.
314:and
303:and
286:talk
271:talk
248:talk
234:talk
226:1395
216:talk
193:and
149:talk
61:talk
45:talk
84:On
664:)
656:.
635:,
547:)
521:)
497:)
473:)
469:•
446:)
442:•
415:)
389:)
360:)
288:)
273:)
250:)
236:)
218:)
210:--
205:!
189:,
181:,
151:)
139:.
125:,
88:,
63:)
47:)
660:(
543:(
517:(
493:(
465:(
438:(
411:(
385:(
356:(
284:(
269:(
246:(
232:(
214:(
147:(
129:)
121:(
111:'
59:(
43:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
