31:
114:, but in the future, please don't revert editor deletions of warnings (or anything else) done by the user on his/her own user talk page. This has been a point of major confusion, I admit, and there is even a policy or guideline that says deleting "is frowned upon", but there is not any policy that actually says it's
452:"xenophobia", Korea was and is a very xenophobic society that regarded Japan as an inferior culture, and furthermore hated Japan for its various crimes throughout history, including the imjin wars and the Japanese occupation from 1910- 1945. it is imperative that the word xenophobic be inserted into the article.
451:
as you well know, Japan has been responsible for a great many crimes and atrocities, commonly accepted to the world. Now, if you edit the article to make it look like Japan is a hated race just from quite innocence, or make them look even worse, it would be FUBAR. to further your inquiry of the word
122:
So I thank you for posting this and other warnings on user pages - they are valuable in escalating matters until a user either reforms or is blocked - but please don't revert; it's not policy, and some editors feel - with some justification - that it's a form (minor, albeit) of harassment. Thanks.
118:
to do so, or authorizes an editor to revert warnings. Rather, the presumption is that (a) a user who deletes a warning has read it; and (b) when deciding what level of warning to give a user, or whether to block (for admins), it's going to be necessary to review the page history (which is why edit
516:
Wooty. You are a poster child for what sysops and bureaucrats should not be. Until you reach sixty and posses PhDs in at least sociology and psychology versus merely leaning on someone elseās your wishes will have insufficient merit to command anyoneās respect in accordance with most of the things
546:
481:
402:
437:
Hey Wooty, thanks for the heads up about NPWatcher, I'll definitely request approval for it. Would you mind sending me your MSN? I'd like to talk to you about this level design thing. Thanks!Ā :) --
138:
Yeah, I thought there was a rule that said a revert was OK, but I decided to search around after doing it and found only an inactive proposal or two. That's why I didn't revert again. Apologies. --
345:
186:
462:
Hmm, I see your point. However, there is a lot of synonyms for the same word - it could possibly be cut down to avoid wordiness...
357:
94:
86:
81:
69:
64:
59:
561:
496:
417:
323:
296:
227:
166:
38:
129:
373:
ok i give up you win just remove me from the nomanation for deletetion, please the attacks are gon damnit--
342:
ok i give up you win just remove me from the nomanation for deletetion, please the attacks are gon damnit
319:
518:
111:
438:
327:
125:
47:
17:
575:
Anyone who thinks that Wooty is not worthy of anyone's respect is not worthy of anyone's respect.
383:
No, sorry. If everything is fixed, everyone'll vote keep - however, discussion doesn't ever hurt.
521:
353:
314:
554:
489:
410:
291:
222:
161:
238:
Yay! I Lawl'd too. In a good way. Laughing with you, not at you. Uh. I'll go edit now.
576:
313:
Thanks for catching that for me. That would be a copy/paste/not fixing error by me. -
239:
190:
579:
570:
505:
456:
441:
426:
377:
361:
332:
302:
261:
242:
233:
193:
172:
132:
537:
472:
393:
374:
349:
276:
258:
207:
146:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
530:
465:
386:
283:
269:
214:
200:
153:
139:
453:
179:
25:
185:
Do you take recommendations for your "Lulz of the day?"
255:why did you delete that continued discussion page.
251:RACIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS
268:Knowledge (XXG) is not a discussion forum. --
8:
110:I agree fully with your NPA-1 posting at
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
375:Lolicon(Down With Child Porn)Saikano
189:(especially last couple entries).
24:
512:Not worthy of anyone's respect..
29:
1:
580:06:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
571:06:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
522:04:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
506:07:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
457:07:57, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
442:20:03, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
427:01:03, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
378:13:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
362:13:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
333:18:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
303:03:00, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
262:02:03, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
119:summaries are so important).
103:Rv of deletions on user pages
243:04:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
234:03:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
194:03:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
173:02:17, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
133:01:48, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
598:
511:
348:comment was added by
112:User talk:PeteJayhawk
42:of past discussions.
199:Request approved. --
18:User talk:Carbon-16
517:you have deleted.
568:
503:
424:
365:
331:
301:
232:
171:
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
589:
569:
566:
559:
553:
551:
544:
535:
504:
501:
494:
488:
486:
479:
470:
425:
422:
415:
409:
407:
400:
391:
343:
317:
290:
281:
221:
212:
160:
151:
128:
78:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
597:
596:
592:
591:
590:
588:
587:
586:
562:
555:
547:
538:
531:
528:
514:
497:
490:
482:
473:
466:
463:
449:
439:lightspeedchick
435:
418:
411:
403:
394:
387:
384:
371:
344:āThe preceding
340:
311:
277:
265:
253:
208:
183:
147:
124:
105:
74:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
595:
593:
585:
584:
583:
582:
519:71.100.174.200
513:
510:
509:
508:
448:
445:
434:
431:
430:
429:
370:
367:
339:
336:
310:
307:
306:
305:
257:
252:
249:
248:
247:
246:
245:
182:
177:
176:
175:
126:John Broughton
104:
101:
98:
97:
92:
89:
84:
79:
72:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
594:
581:
578:
574:
573:
572:
567:
565:
560:
558:
552:
550:
545:
543:
542:
536:
534:
526:
525:
524:
523:
520:
507:
502:
500:
495:
493:
487:
485:
480:
478:
477:
471:
469:
461:
460:
459:
458:
455:
446:
444:
443:
440:
432:
428:
423:
421:
416:
414:
408:
406:
401:
399:
398:
392:
390:
382:
381:
380:
379:
376:
368:
366:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
337:
335:
334:
329:
325:
321:
316:
308:
304:
300:
299:
295:
294:
289:
288:
287:
282:
280:
275:
274:
273:
267:
266:
263:
260:
256:
250:
244:
241:
237:
236:
235:
231:
230:
226:
225:
220:
219:
218:
213:
211:
206:
205:
204:
198:
197:
196:
195:
192:
188:
181:
178:
174:
170:
169:
165:
164:
159:
158:
157:
152:
150:
145:
144:
143:
137:
136:
135:
134:
131:
127:
120:
117:
113:
108:
102:
96:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
77:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
563:
556:
548:
540:
539:
532:
515:
498:
491:
483:
475:
474:
467:
450:
436:
419:
412:
404:
396:
395:
388:
372:
341:
315:Royalguard11
312:
297:
292:
285:
284:
278:
271:
270:
254:
228:
223:
216:
215:
209:
202:
201:
184:
167:
162:
155:
154:
148:
141:
140:
121:
115:
109:
106:
75:
43:
37:
36:This is an
369:OK YOU WIN
338:OK YOU WIN
328:Review Me!
187:Roffle Mao
447:re: reply
433:Hiya back
95:ArchiveĀ 8
87:ArchiveĀ 6
82:ArchiveĀ 5
76:ArchiveĀ 4
70:ArchiveĀ 3
65:ArchiveĀ 2
60:ArchiveĀ 1
577:V-Man737
564:contribs
499:contribs
420:contribs
358:contribs
346:unsigned
298:contribs
264:viola76
240:V-Man737
229:contribs
191:V-Man737
168:contribs
107:Wooty -
527:Sweet.
350:Saikano
309:RE:Uh..
259:Viola76
39:archive
557:Woot?
492:Woot?
413:Woot?
293:Woot?
224:Woot?
163:Woot?
116:wrong
16:<
454:Odst
354:talk
324:Desk
320:Talk
180:Lulz
130:(āā)
123:--
549:ty
533:Wo
484:ty
468:Wo
405:ty
389:Wo
360:)
356:ā¢
286:ty
272:Wo
217:ty
203:Wo
156:ty
142:Wo
91:ā
541:o
529:-
476:o
464:-
397:o
385:-
364:.
352:(
330:)
326:Ā·
322:Ā·
318:(
279:o
210:o
149:o
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.