299:
never changed unsourced notability and never change the birthplace categories for the
Category:People from XXXX to raised in another city by changing a different Category:People from XXXX without an explanation. Anyway, thank you for telling you via message. I know I'm not an administrator. So if User:Marc87 has continue editing unsourced notability, I will leave you a message again ASAP. GRemenber got to User contributions type User:Marc87 and see Marc87's contrbutions and review the former edits that was made by adding unsourced info and changing birthplace categories by raised in another city and warn User:Marc87 never do it again. Thanks and cheers.
225:. On his talk page informing Pigsonthewing about the Noticeboard thread, just "An RfC has been initiated to settle the matter" would have sufficed. The extra part served no beneficial purpose and can only be viewed as being inflammatory. I agree a dispute can be frustrating and it's sometimes a tightrope walk to explain your frustrations in a way that's level-headed but it's beneficial to all if we stick to calm, non-emotional debate. It would be doubly unfortunate if sanctions end up being made due to non-content issues.
612:. I could get plenty of other references, but it's common knowledge that Adler was addicted to both cocaine and heroin. In fact, taking a speedball (a mix of cocaine and heroin) is what caused his stroke. Even if the references you're basing your edit on say heroin, he was addicted to cocaine as well. Just because the reference says heroin, doesn't make it true. That's simply the words of the author. The truth, again, is that he was addicted to cocaine and heroin. So it is because of those problems that he was fired.
22:
465:(at the individual pages) is for some reason not good enough for someone. Why did this information require verification? Information which needs sourcing is information "challenged or likely to be challenged" – this hardly applies to the single releases from an album. Do you disagree with what he added, do you have alternative information? Or did you just remove it
685:
saying that progressive rock should be the only genre because the song's album only lists that, but you cannot use another
Knowledge page as a source. And besides that, the only reason all the Klaatu albums are simply classified "Progressive rock" is because they are generally a prog band, even though albums like Sir Army Suit come nothing close.
290:
a source and an explanation since
Thursay or Friday. If a hockey player was born in the primary birthplace it should add the Category:People from XXXX not changing a different category by raised in another city. I am double categorize on almost all of the categories for now. Since, you remove unsource notability on the article
460:
Well as I said, nothing in the infobox is sourced, so why haven't you removed it, along with everything else in the article that's unsourced, as per your reasoning for removing the singles? None of the track listing is sourced, yet you left it there. Any perusal of
Discogs or something will prove the
289:
Hi ChakaKong. I just wanted to talk to you something, A user has continue changing birthplace category locations to a hockey player raised in another city. So, User:Marc87 has continue changing birthplace categories to raised in another city for a different
Category:People from XXXX locations without
298:
and type the username that's User:Marc87 and then talke a look on almost all of the hockey players articles that is made by editing. After you review on all of the articles on the names of hockey players made unsource notability. Go talk to User:Marc87 at at the user's talk page and warn User:Marc87
656:
to
Symptom of the Universe by Black Sabbath. You said "The source cited states "That (this song) has been described as the first progressive metal song"; this is simply not enough for a genre addition." Iommi then goes on to agree with that claim. This isn't just an Allmusic reviewer saying it, it
440:
I think your templating of IGotProof might be a touch harsh – his additions were factually correct, and infobox material doesn't necessarily need sourcing if it's not remotely contentious, which this isn't. You even said his edits were in good faith in your edit summary. Nothing else in the infobox
162:
is a weaker route than I was going to take but I'm agreeable to that. PS I think it's better to reply at the same place as the message to which you're replying, so it doesn't fragment the conversation and cause out-of-context replies. I will check back for replies to my own messages so I won't miss
220:
You didn't jump the gun. If anything, it was going to be me. This will be my first real dispute resolution too (in almost 10 years of being an editor!) so I'm viewing it as an opportunity to learn about the process. One last thing, I would again caution about wording and tone. Editors will look at
49:
I've been reading Wiki for many years and will sometimes make minor edits on matters of grammar. I see you listed me as a potential socket puppet four years ago and I would like to get that removed. I usually just read the site and hardly ever make edits, but I noticed today the listing when I did
704:
Hi there, I see you reverted the edit of a well-warned user who removed part of the hatnote for Rogers Centre. I must say (reluctantly) that I agree with the edit they made. I recently made a similar edit to the Rogers Centre hatnote. Many hatnotes are way too long, and I'm not sure how anyone
684:
Hi. On the Klaatu song Silly Boys, you changed the infobox genre
Psychedelic rock into Progressive rock. I reverted your edit, and you, on reverting mine, said that I needed a source, even while you were not sourcing your addition of Progressive rock. Now I know you're going to defend yourself by
247:
I am satisfied that that reference found at
Noticeboard thread helps given a specific magazine and article title for the dispute blockquote and can be used to provided a reasonable accurate reference. I am not satisfied over Pigsonthewing's behavior during this long process. And I intend to file
506:
There was no point in discussing it on the talk page because I was sure you weren't interested in the content of the edit, which you confirmed. Nothing ineffectual or irrelevant about it, since you confirmed exactly what I suspected. That was the whole point of my coming here, mate. No dispute
88:
I really don't think the article meets the notability requirements. It's going to boil down to the scope of the reporting of the case. Is/was there significant media coverage? You'll need to provide an indication of importance, meaning you'll need to indicate why the
Disappearance of Kimberly
137:. I feel that it's the best way to proceed. I am contacting each involved party as required. Are you willing to participate? I have contacted Pigsonthewing about this possibility asking him if he would want to proceed. He just deleted the comment so I assume he is wants to go there.
177:
Sorry if I jumped the gun, perhaps I should have let you handle it as I'm not overly familiar with the RfC process. At any rate, I'm confident in my argument in regards to the Zoom dispute, so hopefully this will settle it once and for all.
252:. That requires two editors willing to "at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed". The dispute is now over behavior and not the content. Are you willing to be the second person?
902:
to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from
Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers.
492:, or whether you just had an issue with that editor. I knew the answer anyway. Not everything a troublesome editor does necessarily needs reverting. This discussion is, I feel, more constructive than that particular revert.
812:, about how the songs in a track listing should be numbered. The result could have repercussions for every article of albums originally released in vinyl. If you are interested, please join in the discussion there.
847:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
671:
May I also add, you told me that progressive metal emerged in the 80's, so cannot apply to a 1975 release. Why does this rule suddenly change when you're using it with another genre that also emerged in the 80s
487:
I thought you probably wouldn't. I just wanted to get down to whether you reverted because you had an issue with the content of his edit, i.e. you were actually challenging the information like an editor did at
899:
778:
337:
You're welcome, but I can't talk to User:Marc87 myself, but the user is Chinese and User:Marc87 speaks Chinese did not understand English when I talk to him and he won't understand. But I am still
380:
I'm sorry but I have never seen anyone remove sourced information because of that format before. Could you please help by explaining which format you want on article talk page. Thanks.
755:
580:
Hello there mate. Didn't want to start an edit war, so I'd like to discuss. Adler was addicted to cocaine as well as heroin. Do you agree with this? This is also well-documented.
106:
Thanks for your feedback, I have updated the article with some national media links and the fact that this case started the major crimes unit in HRM PD. Lets hope it's enough...
898:, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as
895:
544:
887:
894:
for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like
73:
and I would to have your feedback on this article, I feel it is part of our Canadian history of missing person in Nova Scotia. I would like to keep it on Knowledge.
540:
732:
I disagree with you. Viewers could quite easily confuse "Rogers Centre" with "Rogers Arena" IMO, and I saw nothing wrong with preventing that from happening.
249:
89:
McAndrew is important or significant enough to warrant the existence of the article. Just source it as best you can and hope for the best. Best of luck.
159:
908:
872:
322:
if he's in violation of anything. But thanks for letting me know about your concerns, I'll take a look at his edits when I get a chance.
415:
536:
904:
868:
891:
584:
Can you provide a reliable source for the cocaine claim? All sources I've read agree that he was fired for heroin addiction.
489:
126:
35:
294:. User:Marc87 did continue editing by unsourced info and did not follow guidelines. Here what you are going to do go to
70:
859:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
864:
809:
706:
532:
55:
355:
Any user can issue warnings to an editor who is violating a guideline. You don't have to be an admin. Cheers.
754:
As an active member of the WikiProject Ice Hockey, you should be aware that there has been a discussion at
722:
609:
512:
497:
478:
450:
385:
134:
817:
617:
257:
230:
195:
I informed pigsonthewing of the RfC and he promptly reverted it as "bollocks". Precisely as I expected.
168:
142:
51:
860:
404:
718:
555:
508:
493:
474:
446:
381:
111:
78:
790:
785:? The article is about a jazz album by Ornette Coleman, and the criteria for FA articles is at
836:
827:
782:
763:
710:
442:
130:
856:
840:
813:
653:
613:
346:
304:
253:
226:
164:
138:
21:
855:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
657:
is the man himself, the creator of the song. If this isn't reliable, i don't know what is.
794:
690:
662:
222:
852:
844:
786:
733:
627:
585:
559:
419:
400:
357:
324:
319:
268:
197:
180:
90:
554:
Sorry but that's not an area I'm knowledgable in. You can most likely find assistance
848:
107:
74:
604:
It's in Adler's book, I'm sure it's also in Slash and Duff's books. It's referenced
759:
399:
I think that we should start a discussion on this. I don't know how to do that.
342:
315:
300:
686:
658:
626:
Your opinion is not the truth. The truth is what the sources can confirm.
912:
876:
821:
798:
767:
743:
726:
694:
666:
637:
621:
595:
569:
548:
516:
501:
482:
454:
429:
414:
Yes, it's something that should be addressed. I initiated a discussion
408:
389:
365:
350:
332:
308:
276:
261:
234:
205:
188:
172:
146:
115:
100:
82:
59:
605:
843:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
473:
and it had no source? Why not just add a "citation needed" tag?
535:
is the one I reviewed, but somehow it won't disappear from the
15:
810:
Template talk:Track listing#RfC regarding track listings
756:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/League assessment
673:
155:
705:
could confuse "Rogers Centre" with "Rogers Arena" (or
717:
seems a good one. What are your thoughts? Thanks.
789:. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers!
888:Knowledge:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge
835:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
531:Hi Chaka. It's about a recently finished review.
125:This is just a notice that I intend to start an
314:OK, but you are also free to discuss this with
285:Changing birthplace categories without a source
8:
758:concerning how NHOCKEY will be interpreted.
221:the way we've handled (or mishandled) being
808:There is currently a Rfc and discussion at
341:an administrator. So thanks for the reply.
250:Knowledge:Requests for comment/User conduct
652:Hi, recently you reverted my addition of
750:WikiProject Ice Hockey/League assessment
266:Yes, just keep me up to date. Thanks.
160:Knowledge:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
7:
395:Rock and Roll Hall of Fame inductees
121:RfC for Technical Ecstasy blockquote
71:Disappearance_of_Kimberly_McAndrew
69:I am writing an article about the
65:Disappearance_of_Kimberly_McAndrew
14:
861:review the candidates' statements
418:. Feel free to comment. Cheers!
20:
882:New 10,000 Challenge for Canada
445:is sourced, after all. Cheers,
892:Knowledge:The 10,000 Challenge
867:. For the Election committee,
837:Arbitration Committee election
828:ArbCom elections are now open!
744:17:49, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
727:16:40, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
700:Reverted edit on Rogers Centre
695:17:47, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
490:Motherlode (James Brown album)
463:pictures of the actual singles
1:
913:01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
900:The North America Destubathon
877:16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
777:Hi! Would you care to review
667:20:44, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
638:03:00, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
622:02:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
596:01:53, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
570:22:29, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
549:21:54, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
517:20:30, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
502:19:05, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
483:18:42, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
455:22:10, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
822:17:18, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
890:is up and running based on
863:and submit your choices on
768:14:22, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
430:03:12, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
409:02:35, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
390:02:12, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
116:02:07, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
101:01:15, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
83:00:56, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
928:
905:MediaWiki message delivery
869:MediaWiki message delivery
707:Rogers Vacuum Tube Company
507:either, in that respect.
366:23:41, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
351:23:39, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
333:23:29, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
309:23:18, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
799:02:26, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
277:20:41, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
262:19:18, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
235:17:34, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
206:17:23, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
189:17:14, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
173:17:10, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
147:16:53, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
648:Symptom Of The Universe
60:22:27, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
896:The Africa Destubathon
841:Arbitration Committee
773:Soliciting comment...
156:reply on my talk page
45:SockPuppet Accusation
804:Track list numbering
471:he had just added it
845:arbitration process
576:Use Your Illusion I
537:list of nominations
461:single releases if
154:RE: "already done"
857:arbitration policy
318:yourself. You can
296:User contributions
783:Of Human Feelings
539:. Any solution?--
443:Let There Be Rock
320:warn him yourself
131:Technical Ecstasy
42:
41:
919:
781:for the article
779:my FA nomination
654:progressive rock
527:Closing a review
24:
16:
927:
926:
922:
921:
920:
918:
917:
916:
884:
865:the voting page
831:
806:
775:
752:
702:
682:
650:
578:
529:
438:
397:
378:
376:Citation format
287:
248:another RfC at
123:
67:
52:Quietgoesthedon
47:
29:
12:
11:
5:
925:
923:
883:
880:
834:
830:
825:
805:
802:
774:
771:
751:
748:
747:
746:
701:
698:
681:
678:
649:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
599:
598:
577:
574:
573:
572:
528:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
437:
434:
433:
432:
396:
393:
377:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
286:
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
237:
211:
210:
209:
208:
193:
192:
191:
122:
119:
104:
103:
66:
63:
46:
43:
40:
39:
31:
30:
25:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
924:
915:
914:
910:
906:
901:
897:
893:
889:
881:
879:
878:
874:
870:
866:
862:
858:
854:
850:
846:
842:
838:
829:
826:
824:
823:
819:
815:
811:
803:
801:
800:
796:
792:
788:
784:
780:
772:
770:
769:
765:
761:
757:
749:
745:
742:
740:
739:
738:
731:
730:
729:
728:
724:
720:
719:Richard Apple
716:
713:principle of
712:
708:
699:
697:
696:
692:
688:
679:
677:
675:
669:
668:
664:
660:
655:
647:
639:
636:
634:
633:
632:
625:
624:
623:
619:
615:
611:
607:
603:
602:
601:
600:
597:
594:
592:
591:
590:
583:
582:
581:
575:
571:
568:
566:
565:
564:
558:. Good luck.
557:
553:
552:
551:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
526:
518:
514:
510:
509:Bretonbanquet
505:
504:
503:
499:
495:
494:Bretonbanquet
491:
486:
485:
484:
480:
476:
475:Bretonbanquet
472:
468:
464:
459:
458:
457:
456:
452:
448:
447:Bretonbanquet
444:
435:
431:
428:
426:
425:
424:
417:
413:
412:
411:
410:
406:
402:
394:
392:
391:
387:
383:
382:In ictu oculi
375:
367:
364:
362:
361:
360:
354:
353:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
335:
334:
331:
329:
328:
327:
321:
317:
313:
312:
311:
310:
306:
302:
297:
293:
284:
278:
275:
273:
272:
271:
265:
264:
263:
259:
255:
251:
246:
245:
236:
232:
228:
224:
219:
218:
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
212:
207:
204:
202:
201:
200:
194:
190:
187:
185:
184:
183:
176:
175:
174:
170:
166:
161:
157:
153:
152:
151:
150:
149:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
128:
120:
118:
117:
113:
109:
102:
99:
97:
96:
95:
87:
86:
85:
84:
80:
76:
72:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
44:
38:
37:
33:
32:
28:
23:
18:
17:
885:
832:
807:
776:
753:
741:
736:
734:
715:less is more
714:
703:
683:
670:
651:
635:
630:
628:
593:
588:
586:
579:
567:
562:
560:
530:
470:
466:
462:
439:
427:
422:
420:
398:
379:
363:
358:
356:
338:
330:
325:
323:
295:
292:Jason Spezza
291:
288:
274:
269:
267:
203:
198:
196:
186:
181:
179:
124:
105:
98:
93:
91:
68:
48:
34:
26:
814:Lewismaster
614:Akdrummer75
541:Вик Ретлхед
316:User:Marc87
254:Jason Quinn
227:Jason Quinn
165:Jason Quinn
139:Jason Quinn
133:blockquote
853:topic bans
849:site bans
436:IGotProof
401:Hoops gza
359:ChakaKong
326:ChakaKong
270:ChakaKong
199:ChakaKong
182:ChakaKong
129:over the
709:). The
469:because
223:WP:CIVIL
108:jbignell
75:jbignell
27:Archives
787:WP:FACR
760:Dolovis
711:hatnote
135:dispute
50:today.
839:. The
680:Klaatu
467:simply
343:Steam5
301:Steam5
158:. The
791:Dan56
735:Chaka
687:Y45ed
659:Y45ed
629:Chaka
587:Chaka
561:Chaka
421:Chaka
92:Chaka
909:talk
886:Hi,
873:talk
818:talk
795:talk
764:talk
737:Kong
723:talk
691:talk
674:here
663:talk
631:Kong
618:talk
610:here
608:and
606:here
589:Kong
563:Kong
556:here
545:talk
533:This
513:talk
498:talk
479:talk
451:talk
423:Kong
416:here
405:talk
386:talk
347:talk
305:talk
258:talk
231:talk
169:talk
163:it.
143:talk
112:talk
94:Kong
79:talk
56:talk
833:Hi,
441:at
339:not
127:RfC
911:)
903:--
875:)
851:,
820:)
797:)
766:)
725:)
693:)
676:?
665:)
620:)
547:)
515:)
500:)
481:)
453:)
407:)
388:)
349:)
307:)
260:)
233:)
171:)
145:)
114:)
81:)
58:)
907:(
871:(
816:(
793:(
762:(
721:(
689:(
661:(
616:(
543:(
511:(
496:(
477:(
449:(
403:(
384:(
345:(
303:(
256:(
229:(
167:(
141:(
110:(
77:(
54:(
36:1
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
